Wednesday, April 2, 2025

Car registration in California: $700. Car registration in Florida: $47

California is run by vandalizing communists.  Who can afford to be a communist?   

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

REDEFINE POLIO: POLIO CASES DROP. THE MIRACLES OF MODERN MEDICINE!!!

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

JAW-DROPPING TESTIMONY FROM JOE BIDEN & HILLARY CLINTON: BOTH CONDEMNED THE PREP ACT IN 2005 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! ALTHOUGH LATER PUSHED AMERICANS TO GET THE SHOT. TRUMP EMBRACED THE PREP ACT AND USHERED IN OPERATION WARP SPEED!!!

WOW! Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton called out the PREP Act as *unconstitutional* in 2005! This Act provides the liability shield for the C19 bioweapon jabs that are maiming/slaughtering Americans en masse. (Recall RFK Jr. can pull the shield right now, unilaterally!) This clip is taken from the recent Summit for Truth and Wellness hosted by Shannon Joy (@ShannonJoyRadio). The speaker is retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (
@sasha_latypova
), who is quoting Biden and Clinton DIRECTLY from 2005. 

Biden on the PREP Act:
I rise to express my surprise and deep-seated opposition to the so called Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, PREP Act, which is included in the Defense Department Appropriations Bill... THIS PROVISION WOULD GIVE THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE ALMOST TOTAL IMMUNITY FROM LIABILITY TO THE MAKERS OF ALMOST ANY DRUG AND TO THOSE WHO ADMINISTER IT. While the measure's proponents portray it as a simple tool to make sure we have sufficient vaccine available in case of avian flu pandemic, the actual language of the provision is far broader than that, and it, therefore, poses a danger to all Americans." (Emphasis added.)
The actual provision permits immunity for the makers to virtually any drug or medical treatment. All the Secretary of Health and Human Services needs to do is declare that it is a countermeasure used to fight an epidemic...ONE SOLITARY PERSON GETS TO DECIDE WHAT IS A COUNTERMEASURE AND WHAT IS AN EPIDEMIC." (Emphasis added.) 
"What is more, this is no typical grant of immunity. No. The breadth of the provision is staggering. A drugmaker can be grossly negligent in making or distributing a drug and still escape liability... IT CAN EVEN MAKE THE DRUG WITH WANTON RECKLESSNESS AND ESCAPE SCOT-FREE AFTER HARMING THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE... In fact, under this provision, the only way a victim could still recover compensation from a drug maker for a dangerous drug or vaccine would be to prove willful misconduct and then only by clear and convincing evidence." (Emphasis added.) "What this means is that for a victim to be able to be compensated by the company that harmed him, he must prove that they committed a crime. Is this the sort of justice systems that Americans desire?"

Hillary Clinton on the PREP Act: 

I would like to take this opportunity to object to insertion of a provision in the Department of Defense Appropriations bill that would provide sweeping immunity protection to pharmaceutical manufacturers... This provision would grant immunity to all claims of loss, including death and disability for broad range of products, including drugs that the secretary designates as as countermeasures.
THE IMMUNITY IS NOT SUBJECT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW... It preempts any state law that provide different liability protections or that may provide stronger consumer safety protection for pharmaceutical products." (Emphasis added.) ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So let me first quote, I'm gonna give you quotes from several unusual sources, unexpected sources. The first source I'm going to quote from is senator at the time, Joseph Biden, saying the following. 'I rise to express my surprise and deep-seated opposition to the so called Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, PREP Act, which is included in the Defense Department Appropriations Bill.' This is 2005. 'This provision would give the secretary of health and human services authority to provide almost total immunity from liability to the makers of almost any drug and to those who administer it. While the measure's proponents portray it as a simple tool to make sure we have sufficient vaccine available in case of avian flu pandemic, the actual language of the provision is far broader than that, and it therefore poses a danger to all Americans.' He sounds very sharp at that time. Very smart. I agree with everything that he said. "'The actual provision permits immunity for the makers to virtually any drug or medical treatment. All the secretary of health and human services needs to do declare that it is a countermeasure used to fight an epidemic.' Just a declaration. 'One solitary person gets to decide what is a countermeasure and what is an epidemic.' Meaning, the health and human services secretary, currently, RFK Jr, gets to decide what is a pandemic and what is a vaccine and what is a countermeasure. One person does not have to take into account anything—no data, no science, no justifications, just his opinion. That's how it's written. "'What is more, this is no typical grant of immunity. No. The breadth of the provision is staggering. A drugmaker can be grossly negligent in making or distributing a drug and still escape liability. Correct. They have done so so far. It can even make the drug with wanton recklessness and escape scot free after harming thousands of people. They've done that. Exactly that. In fact, under this provision, the only way a victim could still recover compensation from a drug maker for a dangerous drug or vaccine would be to prove willful misconduct and then only by clear and convincing evidence.' So the willful misconduct is a narrow definition, clear convincing evidence, very high bar. "'What this means is that for a victim to be able to be compensated by the company that harmed him, he must prove that they committed a crime. Is this the sort of justice systems that Americans desire?' No, Joseph Biden. We don't desire that. You are correct. And now let me quote from another very unusual source, senator Hillary Clinton. 'I would like to take this opportunity to object to insertion of a provision in the Department of Defense Appropriations bill that would provide sweeping immunity protection to pharmaceutical manufacturers.' So she objects to the same thing. 'This provision would grant immunity to all claims of loss, including death and disability for broad range of products, including drugs that secretary designates as as countermeasures. The immunity is not subject to judicial review, so court cannot intervene here. It preempts any state law that provide different liability protections or that may provide stronger consumer safety protection for pharmaceutical products.' So this bill preempts all state laws for consumer protections and preempts judicial review. 

"So, both of these individuals objected. They called it very, very strong language, they called it unconstitutional, and they're correct. It's unconstitutional, and then voted yes." 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: should be clear as day today that the WHO is a business and they are not sad when new diseases emerge.

GPV's DAILY LIFE VS. EVOLUTION

[GPV stands for "World Health Organization Global Program for Vaccines and Immunizations (GPV)."]

Looks like we're going to be in business for sometime.

Almost every day we hear about a new microbe inflicting a new syndrome on an unprepared population prion disease, viral hemorrhagic fevers like Ebola, Marburg, hantivirus Lassa dengue, or tick-borne diseases; or a new kind of flu; not to speak of AIDS and the potential or actual resurgence of tuberculosis, measles, and many other infections that threaten us.

To people outside the international vaccine community, that's bad news.  As geneticist and Noble Laureate, Joshua Lederberg puts it in a nutshell,

The odds are stacked against us we cannot compete with microorganisms whose populations are measured in exponents of 10 to the 12th power a million million 10 14 10 18 over periods of days and who are living in a sea of mutagenic influences.

To people like me and my GPV colleagues, it's good news.  

All right, we have a daunting task and maybe we won't win in the end.  Maybe as vaccine researcher and developer, Stanley Plotkin, said, "Prevention by vaccine is the El Dorado of research in infectious disease."  

. . . the reason why we shouldn't succeed.  Just three years ago, there were only about 150 candidate vaccines in development; today, only 4 years after GPV was created, there are about 240.

Yes, indeed, the news for us in the vaccine business is good.

And, yes, we are human beings and have got to eat, and the continual emergence of new diseases means our jobs aren't likely to disappear in the near future.  And as a human beings, we do share concerns about how life on our planet will evolve, and we do realize that scientists and health policy makers that are decisions could have a profound impact on future generations . . . . 


 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,
The Encampments: A Documentary.

This is a joke, right?  Trump wants to revoke $9 billion in funding from Harvard over alleged "antisemitism" and criticism of Israel?  Why would Trump want to incinerate the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution?  What happened to the America First platform inherent in the Make America Great Again?  Clearly, Trump is not out to Make America Great Again but to preserve Israel at all costs against any criticism of genocide while they commit genocide. 
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)