ROMAN BYSTRIANYK: Stanley Plotkin, the Godfather of vaccines, testified in 2018. Isn’t it shocking how those who researched and made these vaccines thought nothing of experimenting on anyone they thought they could?

Stanley Plotkin, the Godfather of vaccines, testified in 2018. Isn’t it shocking how those who researched and made these vaccines thought nothing of experimenting on anyone they thought they could? How many other drugs were and are still tested on those that these experimenters… pic.twitter.com/RVMX8eg7Cm

— Roman Bystrianyk (@RBystrianyk) August 3, 2024

Stanley Plotkin, the Godfather of vaccines, testified in 2018. Isn’t it shocking how those who researched and made these vaccines thought nothing of experimenting on anyone they thought they could? How many other drugs were and are still tested on those that these experimenters decide they can do so on? Is this attitude any different than those from Nazi Germany that decide that they could experiment on those that were lesser than them? Transcript of videotaped deposition of Stanley A. Plotkin, M.D. New Hope, Pennsylvania. January 11, 2018. Video starting at 7:50:51. Q: Have you ever used the mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine? A: I don't recollect ever doing studies on mentally handicapped individuals. At the time in the 1960s, it was not an uncommon practice. Q: So you're saying -- I'm not clear on your answer. I'm sorry. Have you ever used mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine? A: What I'm saying is I don't recall specifically having done that, but that in the 1960s, it was not unusual to do that. And I wouldn't deny that I may have done so. Q: Is one of the things you wrote: The question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society or to perform initial studies in children and adults who are human in form but not in social potential? A: Yes. Q: It may be objected that this question implies a Nazi philosophy, but I do not think that it is difficult to distinguish nonfunctioning persons from members of ethnic, racial, economic, or other groups. A: Mm-hmm. Q: Have you ever used babies of mothers in prison to study an experimental vaccine? A: Yes. Q: Have you ever used individuals under colonial rule to study an experimental vaccine? A: Yes. Q: Did you do so in the Belgian Congo? A: Yes. Q: Did that experiment involve almost a million people? 

A: Well -- well, all right, yes. 

Here is part of Plotkin's 9-hour testimony, discussing the contents of the vaccines and what they're sourced from.  At the 11-minute mark, Plotkin answers questions about vaccine experimentation on the mentally handicapped and orphans.  Nice, a la Antony Fauci.

STANLEY PLOTKIN, FATHER OF VACCINE RESEARCH: Tells you what vaccines are made from

This man is Stanley Plotkin, the Godfather of vaccines. He is also a consultant to Moderna, one of the main manufacturers of the Covid vaccine. He is under oath admitting to the use of fetal tissue from aborted babies. He also says he'll gladly go to hell for what he's done.… pic.twitter.com/ImHHb4w2uP

— (Honest/Ethical/Safe Dr) David Cartland (@CartlandDavid) July 31, 2024

The Pantheon of Vaccine Ghouls: Dr. Stanley Plotkin, Kathryn Edwards, Paul Offit, et al.

 

One of the features of evil is laziness and sloppy or blending of meaning so that meaning serves the interest purely of the speaker. Paul Offit was a former student of Plotkin's.  

Paul A. Offit, MD, is the Director of the Vaccine Education Center and an attending physician in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

I don't like his exhales of disgust to thwart the prosecutor's line of questioning. 

Plotkin obviously isn't the only lab ghoul devising lethal vaccines.  His former student, Paul Offit, the head of vaccines at Philadelphia's Children's Hospital defends their use on healthy kids.  That's healthy kids.  Healthy, yes, healthy kids.  Then there is Kathryn M. Edwards who was deposed back in 2020 and in 2022 for her testimony on the connection between vaccines and autism.  

https://t.co/5t0yIWrlqI

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) June 29, 2023

SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: should be clear as day today that the WHO is a business and they are not sad when new diseases emerge.

This gem is from 1998. It should be clear as day today that the WHO is a business and they are not sad when new diseases emerge. pic.twitter.com/idOqRpEH2w

— Suzanne Humphries (@DrSuzanneH7) March 10, 2025

GPV's DAILY LIFE VS. EVOLUTION

[GPV stands for "World Health Organization Global Program for Vaccines and Immunizations (GPV)."]

Looks like we're going to be in business for sometime.

Almost every day we hear about a new microbe inflicting a new syndrome on an unprepared population prion disease, viral hemorrhagic fevers like Ebola, Marburg, hantivirus Lassa dengue, or tick-borne diseases; or a new kind of flu; not to speak of AIDS and the potential or actual resurgence of tuberculosis, measles, and many other infections that threaten us.

To people outside the international vaccine community, that's bad news.  As geneticist and Noble Laureate, Joshua Lederberg puts it in a nutshell,

The odds are stacked against us we cannot compete with microorganisms whose populations are measured in exponents of 10 to the 12th power a million million 10 14 10 18 over periods of days and who are living in a sea of mutagenic influences.

To people like me and my GPV colleagues, it's good news.  

All right, we have a daunting task and maybe we won't win in the end.  Maybe as vaccine researcher and developer, Stanley Plotkin, said, "Prevention by vaccine is the El Dorado of research in infectious disease."  

. . . the reason why we shouldn't succeed.  Just three years ago, there were only about 150 candidate vaccines in development; today, only 4 years after GPV was created, there are about 240.

Yes, indeed, the news for us in the vaccine business is good.

And, yes, we are human beings and have got to eat, and the continual emergence of new diseases means our jobs aren't likely to disappear in the near future.  And as a human beings, we do share concerns about how life on our planet will evolve, and we do realize that scientists and health policy makers that are decisions could have a profound impact on future generations . . . .