Friday, February 7, 2025
California Woman Confronts Chemtrail Pilots from Weather Modification International
California Woman Confronts Chemtrail Pilots from Weather Modification International - https://t.co/V6qPqDvZ1i
— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) February 7, 2025
✈️ “That’s their responsibility - that’s not our responsibility”
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) February 5, 2025
Holy crap - Woman locates & hunts down Chemtrail pilot & confronts him ‼️ pic.twitter.com/56vciF3XZA
from NeedtoKnowNews,
A woman who writes under the name ‘Kat’ in the MellowKat Newsletter recorded her encounter at the Modesto Jet Center with pilots from Weather Modification International. She says they are spraying chemtrails in her area, in or near Sonora in Central California, and are causing unhealthy conditions. She asked to speak with Jody Fischer who was unavailable and spoke with an unidentified pilot who did not deny that he was using his plane to spray substances in the sky. She has been collecting rainwater and has had it analyzed for chemicals.
In her article, there is a bill from Weather Modification International for $81,707.00 for the month of November 2022 for “Aircraft Seeding Operations”, materials and mobilization. The bill was sent to the Turlock Irrigation District. Kat said that the Tuolumne County Supervisors are clueless about chemtrails.
If you want to follow this topic, MellowCat's newsletter is an excellent place to start. Her name is Catherine Gardiner. She uses the app FlightRadar24 to track the pilots spraying chemtrails in her area.
Her conversation above is with a captain.
Her full conversation with a Modesto pilot is halfway down on this page.
The pilot she's talking to is Jody Fischer. Fischer is an aviation professional with over 17 years of pilot experience in special missions including cloud seeding and atmospheric research aircraft operations.
Justifiably called rape gangs in the UK and Dominic is involved in a project that has contributed to spreading the word about it but also helping people recognize just how horrific it was and it's precisely those details that I just I would refer you to Dominick's project for the full details.
What's the time frame when all this occurred and what are the circumstances?
03:29. Here's what I learned since doing this project it has been going on Tom since the 1950s. The first wave of immigrants came to the UK after the 2nd world war, . . . mostly peculiar to Pakistani Muslims. And there was a large influx of these people in the 1950s and it involves the grooming and raping of young white girls, and in some cases these girls whereas young as 11, and it was common for them to be aged 12 and 13. The age of consent in the UK is 16 and I think it is in the states as well. For so many reasons, the authorities turned a blind eye to it in the fifties, and it was just here and there; it wasn't eveslightlyRotherin the 50s, it was just here and there. Because they turned a blind eye to it, it was able to grow and grow. And by the 90s and the noughties and the tweenies, it reached industrial scale. These men would groom young girls and they would do some of the most graphic and horrible things to them. It's only the result of this project that I have learned just how awful some of the stuff is and it's so awful you cannot repeat it on air it's that bad.
05:50. The project that I was involved in was organized by an Irish filmmaker, named Phelim McAleer. I should say what he does is he creates podcasts of film but only uses the actual words as they were and so in this case I had to read out a judge's sentencing and these were the actual words of the judge and it's a 45 minute film and I'm just sitting there playing the judge reading out this sentencing. But in reading out the sentencing, you discover some of the most graphic and horrific stories you will ever hear in your life. And I sat there playing this judge and reading it out and going, "this is not possible that one human being could do this to another." But here's the terrifying thing is the authorities turned a blind eye to it and we know that in the 90s and the noughties, when I say the authorities, I mean the police, the politicians, the media, social workers, you know, the authorities. The reason they turned a blind eye to it is, broadly speaking, they were all terrified of being called racist. And this whole thing went against the pro-multicultural narrative that pervaded at the time, rather than saying, "Look at this industrial scale rate of young working class white girls," rather than admit to it and confront it and put the perpetrators in prison, the authorities chose to ignore the girls they throw our own children under the bus. And one of the crimes committed are, on a scale of 1 to 10, somewhere near 15. But the next level of crime is the failure of the authorities to address it, deal with it, and protect their own people. And it's terrible but I worked out that, we did a broad calculation, I haven't got the figures just before the court so I'm going to get it slightly wrong, but in one town Rotherham, they worked out that in a 12-year period there were 1,600 victims. Now we know that this took place in more than 50 towns across the country. And even though it goes back to the 1950s, because it was ignored and grew to an industrial scale, it only reached industrial scale in the late 90s, noughties, and tweenies, say 1995 and 2020. It's still going on now. In that 12-year period there were 1600 victims in that one town if you say okay that's a 12 year period over a 24-year period it was 3,000 victims in one town. But then you realize this is happening in as many as 50 to 100 towns across the UK. Do the math. Multiply 50 or 100 x 3,000, and you're looking at numbers in the hundreds of thousands
PETER ST ONGE: 99.2% of new jobs last month went to foreign-born workers
since July 2018, the US labor force has added 4.6 million foreign-born workers, while the number of native-born workers has declined by nearly 700K
the only job growth in the US in the past 6 years has been for foreigners, is clearly the result of Biden's policies --ZeroHedge
99.2% of new jobs last month went to foreign-born workers 🤯https://t.co/a90g7RIaaw
— Peter St Onge, Ph.D. (@profstonge) February 7, 2025
The article is titled, "Lost In Today's Job Revision Chaos: Over 1 Million Foreign-Born Workers Found A Job... And No Native Borns."
Earlier today, the BLS confirmed what we previewed last night (see "Tomorrow's Jobs Report Will Finally Capture The Surge In Illegal Aliens, Lead To Another Big Negative Payrolls Revision"), and admitted what we had been saying for much of the past 3 years -that most of the job gains in the past few years, and especially 2024, were a mirage, and following the dramatic August 2024 preliminary data revision which vaporized 818K jobs (which had never existed in the first place)
. . .
And the reason why it won't be a problem is simple: while it won't get much discussion today, the biggest reason behind today's solid increase in the number of employed workers is the same one we have been pounding the table on since 2023. It's all foreign workers, and - as we explained recently - it is mostly all illegal aliens.
That's right, the BLS reported that in January, over a million, or 1,045,000 to be precise, foreign-born workers found a job (and as Standard Chartered explained lst June, this is largely illegal or "undocumented" aliens) compared to only 8,000 native-born workers!
This means that while we just hit another month of record foreign-born (largely illegal alien) workers, at 31.774 million, the number of native-born workers remains unchanged over the past six years, still below levels last hit in 2019, just before the covid crisis.
This also means that since July 2018, the US labor force has added 4.6 million foreign-born workers, while the number of native-born workers has declined by nearly 700K.
And while this (not really) shocking increase in foreign workers, which really is just the latest in a long series of monthly reports confirming that the only job growth in the US in the past 6 years has been for foreigners, is clearly the result of Biden's policies, we would recommend that president Trump do something to urgently if not immediately address this critical topic... a topic which one year ago we correctly predicted would win Trump the 2024 election - and which if left as is, will promptly lead to the transformation of the current euphoria in Trump's presidency, with disappointment.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)