Oh, man, can we just move on? Yeah, as soon as we take out the trash from 3 and a half years ago.
August 11, 2020
— Kevin Bass PhD MS (@kevinnbass) December 31, 2023
21-year-old Australian mom of three is choked and arrested for not wearing a mask.
She had an exemption from a doctor.
She was charged with assaulting a police officer.
Mask mandates are being reimplemented.
Masks have minimal effect at preventing COVID-19. pic.twitter.com/0JVGI3ne7F
They were withholding her from us until we were willing to let her die. --Christina Croft
Hard to watch? Imagine being present and going against the masses. https://t.co/rYDrRzoOBF
— Kelly DNP🐭Functional/Integrative Med (@kacdnp91) December 12, 2023
00:04. Christina Croft.
00:07. And this is about your mama? Okay, first question did your mom take any COVID-19 shots?
00:12. No, she was not vaccinated.
00:15: do you know why she didn't take one?
00:16. Probably because of me. I kept encouraging her not to take it, because I felt like it was not going to be good for her; I thought it would be dangerous for her. She had asthma and allergies, and I kept encouraging her not to take it. My dad took it, but my mom didn't.
00:35. What was going on that made her go to the hospital?
00:38. So she had gotten covid and handling it at home we got her a prescription for Ivermectin unfortunately the pharmacy refused to fill the prescription for her we went to several different pharmacies and no one would fill it.
00:53. Did they say why they wouldn't fill it?
00:55. They just said they wouldn't. They wouldn't even let us talk to the pharmacist they just said you know we're not filling it and so she we had an oximeter at home and she eventually hurt oxygen went down below 90 and that scared them so they went into the hospital in August of 2021 and she was completely corn from us we weren't allowed to be with her at all.
01:20. Did she have a phone where she could text you or . . . ?
01:21. She did actually. She was texting my dad quite a bit. He was allowed to sit outside the room if he had full PPE on, but they kept the door locked and they would just text each other.
01:34. Is that because he was vaccinated by any chance?
01:36. They had that rule for everybody in the hospital. They had literal security guards at the entrance to the hospital and would not let people into the hospital. And then once if you were cleared, you could go up to her room and sit outside the glass wall, but you weren't allowed to go inside her room.
01:54. So did they give your mom and remdesivir?
01:56. They did. We did not know at first. They told her it was called the "Trump protocol" or "Trump cocktail," or something, I guess what they gave Donald Trump is what they said they were giving her. She said it's something with an "R." She didn't really know what it was. And we had to do some research before we found out it was Remdesivir. And we begged the doctors to . . . can you just give her her Ivermectin, she's already got a prescription for it? They refused. We showed them studies that it was working, and they said, "Well, that's just anecdotal." They wouldn't even listen to us. We asked them to give her high-dose vitamin C, IV, but they said that the hospital doesn't do that, which we found out was a lie; they do offer high-dose vitamin C IVs. So she had the full course of Remdesivir.
02:51. When was last time she stopped communicating?
02:55. So on September 6th, she texted my dad at 7:30 in the morning and said, you know, "Good morning. I love you. I'm not getting better," and then she texted him and said, "There are no fluids, no IVs hooked up." And my dad texted her back and said "What, you don't have any IVs hooked up?" And she said no. And then she just wrote the word RICHARD. And my mom is a very sweet woman. If she said, "Richard," that was like pay attention, something is wrong. And he said what's going on and she said please find out what's wrong and that was the last time anybody heard from her so they vented her without telling anyone and that was the last time she spoke with my dad.
03:36. So when did you hear that she had passed were you there?
03:38. We were there. When they took her to the ICU, they told us basically verbatim what they told everybody, "As soon as you're ready to let her go, we'll unhook her and you can just . . . everybody can gather in her room." They wouldn't let us go near her while she was on the ventilator, but they were willing to let everybody in the room if we decided to let her die. And so after she died, I can't remember what day it was . . . it was the 16th. She she died on September 16th.
04:12. How long was she taking off the ventilator before she died?
04:14. 10 days. So she was on the ventilator for 10 days, and I think that's their protocol; that was pretty much what everybody would get, 10 days. And then they would bring in the palliative care doctor to try to make you feel better about letting your family member go, and we have a lot of siblings and we all met together, and she was really, really bad at that point. So we all decided that it was just best to . . . she wasn't responding to pain, she had no gag reflex, and so once they decided to turn the vent off everybody . . . it was all like, all of a sudden, COVID didn't matter anymore. There was no protocol. There was nothing. We were allowed to be in the room. Nobody was worried about germs; no one had masks; nobody had gloves, nothing. We were all hugging her, so we knew at that point that it wasn't . . . they weren't really scared of everybody getting it. They were withholding her from us until we were willing to let her die. And so she passed away about an hour after we took her off the ventilator. We just sat and sang hymns with her . . . until she died. She was married to my dad for almost 43 years she was a pastor's wife and we have seven kids lots and lots of grandkids and great grandkids and she was just a beautiful person that I feel was unjustly killed they refuse to have us have any say and how she was treated I even have text messages where she would text my dad before she went into the ICU and say like 4:00 in the afternoon I finally got my lunch you know they weren't feeding her regularly she had had an accident and they left her soiled for hours until they came in and changed her but no one was there to advocate for her because we weren't allowed to be in the room we weren't allowed to be in there to you know say hey she needs to be changed or she needs to get her food or whatever I tried to have the hospital investigated but I no one no one will listen no one will help so.
06:28. Did you get her medical records?
06:29. I did.
06:30. Have you been through them?
06:32. I've tried. I'm not very medically intelligent. I don't know what the word is. A lot of it is hard to read, but I got to the day that she actually died, and they said that they came in and they said her skin looked dusty and that they decided to put her on a ventilator. I guess maybe it was turning colors. But she was texting my dad, so she was still aware. She knew something was wrong. She knew something was about to happen. And even before they vented her, the nurse would say things like "Well, you let us know if you want to go on a ventilator if something goes south." They just kept asking her, prodding her. They kept telling her, "You need to calm down. You need to let us give you morphine or put you to sleep, so you can calm down." [That sounds like they were building a case against the min, recording it somewhere as a justification for the kill shot.] My mom was not a very excitable woman. She wasn't panicking, but obviously, anybody in the hospital would be scared. But it was like they knew what they wanted to do. [Yeah. They had a COVID death schedule and they knew the payout once that took place.] They knew what the protocol was and they were moving her as quick as they could, moving her to get to the end so that they could bring in the next patient.
SUMMARY
Kim is not jabbed and knows the harms of the masks and the shots, regardless of the type of shot. She has warned her co-workers, including Dean Blevins (CEO), Lauren Alexander (Human Resources Director), and Jennifer Dreher (APRN, CNO.) well in advance. Kim also submitted her religious exemption to them with peer-reviewed, referenced, proof of harm. Her religious exemption was denied.
Kim was sent home on Monday, October 30th, 2023, and then returned to work on Thursday, November 2nd, 2023. This was the date of the meeting and the recording.
Kim learned of the recent FDA safety signal (regarding the taking of both the COVID shot and the Flu shot), which dropped on the 29th of October, then she warned them on the 30th, the next day. Kim has always warned her co-workers about the harm of masks and shots, and how informed consent is not being given to the patients or the employees.
As a House Shift Supervisor, she was told to enforce Select Medical’s reimplemented mask policy for those who have not taken a flu shot. Their policy is that if you take the flu shot, you don’t need to wear a mask. If you don’t take the flu shot, you have to wear a mask and force others to do so.
Kim refused, based on religious beliefs and medical facts.
They sent Kim home to silence her. Then, she went back on the 2nd of November and they used her religious beliefs about the mask to further silence her, then they terminated her on Friday, November 3rd of 2023.
In this meeting on November 2nd, 2023, Kim was in a room with Dean Blevins (the CEO), Lauren Alexander (Human Resources Director), and Jennifer Dreher, APRN, CNO (the lady on the phone in the recording).
Kim recorded this meeting.
Above is her recording.
Kim is a friend of mine, a mother, and a patriot of the highest order. She has witnessed atrocities at former hospitals where she’s worked and former nursing homes as well, specifically from 2020 up to the current day.
If you can assist Kim in her legal battle, with any legal referrals or legal advice, please reach out to me at: americaneducationfm@protonmail.com.
TRANSCRIPT
1:38. So we just wanted to follow up from our last conversation and make sure you're doing okay, and then kind of go from there. [Insincere: trying to disarm his audience]
1:46. We wanted to touch base with you before you got here. We left you a voicemail . . . [Getting to business; tries to establish authority in conversation]
1:50. Yeah, I don't know what happened with that [questioning & indicting his intentions]
1:51. That's okay [Bevins trying to buy back some creds with her; he's failing and flailing]
1:59. How are you feeling.
2:00. I'm still very concerned and I don't know how to make that and I don't know how to make that concern go away because those are significant safety signals I don't know how I'm supposed to feel I feel the way that I feel.
2:18. So I guess from my standpoint my question to you is do you think that you're able to lead the floor as a house supervisor? Like knowing what you know, knowing where our patients are at, knowing where our staff is at [with] enforcing the mask with the people that don't have the flu shot, do you feel that you're able to leave the floor?
2:45. That's what I've been doing I mean and I'm not going to enforce a mask when I don't know what their religious standpoint is or what their medical standpoint is that's none of my business that's a HIPAA thing.
2:58. But that's a job requirement as a leader.
3:00. You are too enforce the mask when you know that people don't have the vaccine.
3:06. But I don't know because it's medical information that I'm not privy to
3:12. We provide a list of the house supervisor . . .
3:13. So you're violating people's Medical information
3:17. We don't know what they're
3:18. If you're giving me a list, you're providing me with your personal medical information. You're violating HIPAA.
3:23. We're following our select policy
3:24. And your select policy is violating your own corporate policy I mean I don't know what you guys want me to do but you're asking me to break the law and I'm not okay with that.
3:35. I just told you what we want . . .
3:35. So you're asking me to break the law
3:37. We're not breaking the law.
3:38. You are breaking the law . . .
3:39. We're following our policies from slot[?]
3:40. And HIPAA is very clear, and you're breaking HIPPA.
3:48. No because every leader gets [a list of] who is vaccinated who isn't vaccinated every hospital.
3:50. But that is not . . . that is their medical history. Providing somebody with a medical procedure is medical history.
3:58. Kim, we're not going to continue to do this, like this is everywhere, every hospital, every leadership team you get how many people are vaccinated, what vaccination they have, what they're getting, and we have to enforce on the floor our policy. Our policy is that you wear a mask if you do not have the flu vaccine.
4:16. Okay well I've already given you guys my religious beliefs and my religious exemption and that's where I stand. I don't know what anybody else is medical status is.
4:26. I wasn't submitting that to you because I was looking for acceptance. You, you have no right to accept or deny my religious beliefs. You have no right.
The right to travel is fundamental, but the government has mandated a kill-switch in new vehicles sold after 2026. The kill-switch will monitor driver performance and disable cars based on the information gathered. We will vote on my amendment to defund this mandate tonight. pic.twitter.com/Uf0Z2yVNP1
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) November 8, 2023
Massie said that most Democrats didn't even know the law, didn't even know that the law calls for a "kill switch." Massie's amendment to HR 4820 asked that the taxpayer not fund the "kill switch." Massie was looking for the American taxpayer. Democrats said, F you.
During debate last night on my amendment to defund the 2026 kill-switch mandate for cars, some Democrats claimed the technology wouldn’t monitor or disable cars. Here’s the actual law I had to read to them:
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) November 8, 2023
My amendment failed. Link to the roll call vote: https://t.co/YWufj9C2C3 pic.twitter.com/JDN1TltaDo
Good question. Who do you think is going to control the "kill switch"? The same folks who ran the lockdowns on your family.
Who exactly is going to operate these kills switches?
— Toby Rogers, Ph.D., M.P.P. (@uTobian) November 8, 2023
The same people who mandated lockdowns, masks, social distancing, and useless toxic vaccines? https://t.co/qjubID1I5W
Wowsers, The many lies of Bill Gates on one 2 minute clip.....👀 pic.twitter.com/6ycaKIX9Mi
— 𝙍𝙄𝙎𝙀𝙈𝙀𝙇𝘽𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙉𝙀 (@Risemelbourne) November 7, 2023
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) happens to babies, from 1 month to 1 year in age, but most frequently between 2 and 4 months of age.
Recently I interviewed a former police detective who handled over 250 SIDS cases for a major US city. She revealed her full name and I was able to independently verify her employment at the police department.
In the interview, she revealed that 50% of the SIDS cases happened within 48 hours after a vaccine was given and about 70% of the cases happened within one week of a vaccine.
This can only mean one thing: that the childhood vaccines are the leading cause of SIDS deaths.
There is no other explanation.
Even her pediatrician acknowledged this, but they aren’t allowed to talk about it. She said that the American Academy of Pediatrics trains the pediatricians in how to gaslight parents who seek to blame the vaccine.
This is the first time these statistics have ever been revealed publicly.
All the information is independently verifiable in the police records for any health authority who has any doubts.
Also, I am working with the police department to make these statistics public directly from the police department itself (I cannot compel the production of these records because the FOIA laws in the state exempt these records).
This paper, Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature, states this:
Of all reported SIDS cases post-vaccination, 75 % occurred within 7 days (p < 0.00001).
This almost exactly matches what Jennifer said in my interview (70% within one week). Neither of us was aware of this article at the time we made the video.
This is impossible if the vaccines aren’t causing SIDS. There is simply no other viable explanation for the association. But of course, you won’t get your paper published if you say that. You have to say that the association is interesting.
In Canada, if you are a police officer and suspect that vaccines cause SIDS, they will prosecute you. It seems that is illegal in Ottawa to question the safety of the vaccines:
"Hearing to continue for Ottawa police officer accused of looking for vaccine links to child death cases," Joanne Laucius, August 18, 2023.
Helen Grus is a Forensic Police Detective in Canada who was looking into the sudden infant deaths that appeared to be connected to mothers being vaccinated.
For the last 2 years she was stoned walled by her own police force. Her court case resumes Oct 2023 and will drag into 2024.
She is being persecuted for seeking the truth. I hope that Detective Helen Grus will be exonerated and continue to investigate the “baffling mystery” of dead babies.
She was suspended without pay for not taking the COVID vaccine and she doesn’t think masks are effective either.
In short, they are trying to get rid of critical thinkers that are trying to get to the truth in the Ottawa police department.
See also these articles which cast Grus as the problem, rather than the vaccines:
1. Detective tried to uncover vaccine status of dead children’s parents, sources say.
Here’s a story casting Grus in a favorable light, pointing out that she didn’t violate any policy of the department and that the police department illegally provided documents to CBC Ottawa reporter Shaamini Yogaretnam which is a criminal offense, yet nobody in the police department is being charged with a crime. Former Toronto police detective Donald Best is baffled that Grus was charged at all, given the investigative discretion bestowed to all police officers. He pointed out that “a fourth-class constable on his or her first day on the job has all the authority to initiate any investigation they want to from parking tickets to homicide.”
1. Detective who investigated safety of Covid shot continues to fight to clear her name.
That article points out that the investigating official, Chris Renwick, is denying discovery requests and refusing to investigate the source of the leak even though it is a criminal offense.
Here are more excellent articles and videos:
1. Ottawa Detective was singled out by police leadership for her opposition to Covid mandates.
2. Political meddling suspected in Ottawa police investigation of Constable Helen Grus
3. Articles on Helen Grus from The Epoch Times.
In short, this isn’t justice. They are stacking the deck against Grus, rather than following the law. CBC is ghosting requests for comment from True North.
Bipartisan Presidential Executive Orders in 2003, 2005, and 2014 authorized the Secretary of Health and Human Services to detain Americans on suspicion of having colds and flus.
Third installment of the Callender Interview series.
OBSERVATION:
The governments of nation-states around the world can’t stop the mass murder and mass maiming of the world’s people through forced detentions (in homes, nursing homes, schools, hospitals, and quarantine facilities); forced masking and social distancing; forced withholding of preventative and early treatments for Covid-19; forced administration of ventilation, Remdesivir, midazolam and other lethal poisons; and forced administration of mRNA and DNA bioweapon injections, until those governments and their central banks (the Federal Reserve in the United States) are prepared to forego access to the international financial system controlled by the individuals who control the Bank for International Settlements.
One step would be the signing of a Presidential Executive Order revoking Executive Order 13295 of April 4, 2003; Executive Order 13375 of April 1, 2005, and Executive Order 13674 of July 31, 2014, and reinstating Executive Order 12452 of Dec. 22, 1983.
2005 - World Health Organization creates International Health Regulations, IHR
In 2005, through the World Health Organization, the individuals who control the Bank of International Settlements created the International Health Regulations (IHR).
The second edition of the IHR is described, by WHO, as follows:
"In response to the exponential increase in international travel and trade and emergence and reemergence of international disease threats and other health risks, 196 countries across the globe have agreed to implement the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR). This binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007.”
The stated purpose and scope of the IHR are "to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade."
The IHR "are not limited to specific diseases, but are applicable to health risks, irrespective of their origin or source."
The IHR further, "requires States to strengthen core surveillance and response capacities at the primary, intermediate and national level, as well as at designated international ports, airports and ground crossings. They further introduce a series of health documents, including ship sanitation certificates and an international certificate of vaccination or prophylaxis for travelers."
The 2005 International Health Regulations required each signatory nation to adopt implementing legislation, which the United States government did, through [among many other acts] revisions to 42 Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 70 and 71.
Those federal laws regulate interstate and foreign quarantine activities during "public health emergencies of international concern."
2017 - Major rulemaking by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
The most recent, major revisions of 42 CFR Parts 70 and 71 occurred through a "final rulemaking" by the Department of Health and Human Services, published in the Federal Register on Jan. 19, 2017, and effective Feb. 17, 2017. (See 6890 Federal Register. Vol. 82, No. 12)
The Federal Register entry reported that some commenters, during the public comment period, requested clarification concerning whether the World Health Organization’s (WHO) declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) could continue to serve as the basis for a ‘‘public health emergency’’ if the President or HHS Secretary disagreed with the declaration of a PHEIC on legal, epidemiologic, or policy grounds.
Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control respondents described such a scenario as “unlikely” and noted that “CDC remains a component of HHS, subject to the authority and supervision of the HHS Secretary and President of the United States.”
Another comment addressed the same concern from a slightly different perspective: the commenter “objected to referencing the WHO’s declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in the definition of ‘‘public health emergency’’ because this ostensibly relinquishes U.S. sovereignty.”
Again, HHS/CDC respondents said they “disagreed” with the characterization, stating that US government officials would "give consideration to the WHO’s declaration of a PHEIC" but would “continue to make its own independent decisions regarding when a quarantinable communicable disease may be likely to cause a public health emergency if transmitted to other individuals.”
A few paragraphs later, the HHS/CDC respondents again said that “it would be unlikely for the United States to formally object to the WHO’s declaration of a PHEIC, but that CDC remains a component of HHS, subject to the authority and supervision of the HHS Secretary and President of the United States.”
It’s very careful sophistry. HHS states that the US government is unlikely to even try to resist a WHO declaration, not addressing what would happen in the unlikely event of such an attempt. Presumably because it would be financially impossible for the US government to make the attempt because the Federal Reserve would immediately lose access to the Bank of International Settlements.
Other commenters expressed concern that "any disease considered to be a public health emergency may qualify it as quarantinable" and noted that some PHEICs ‘‘most certainly do not qualify as public health emergencies’’ under the proposed definition.
HHS/CDC respondents “clarified” that “only those communicable diseases listed by Executive Order of the President may qualify as quarantinable communicable diseases. For example, Zika virus infection, which although the current epidemic was declared a PHEIC by WHO, is not a quarantinable communicable disease.”
After dispatching with the comments, the HHS/CDC respondents concluded: “The definition of Public health emergency is finalized as proposed.”
US Presidents’ Executive Orders since 1990
As it happens, there have been three Executive Orders issued by US Presidents related to the quarantine power of the Secretary of Health and Human Services laws since 1990.
They were promulgated under section 361(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264(b)), and they assigned the President's executive authority to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for implementation.
Executive Order 13295
On April 4, 2003, President George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13295, listing:
“(a) Cholera; Diphtheria; infectious Tuberculosis; Plague; Smallpox; Yellow Fever; and Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (Lassa, Marburg, Ebola, Crimean-Congo, South American, and others not yet isolated or named) and
(b) Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), which is a disease associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, is transmitted from person to person predominantly by the aerosolized or droplet route, and, if spread in the population, would have severe public health consequences.”See Federal Register/Vol. 68, No. 68, p. 17255
The 2003 Executive Order revoked Executive Order 12452 of Dec. 22, 1983, which specified quarantinable diseases as including "Cholera or suspected Cholera, Diphtheria, infectious Tuberculosis, Plague, suspected Smallpox, Yellow Fever, and suspected Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (Lassa, Marburg, Ebola, Congo-Crimean, and others not yet isolated or named).”
In other words, in 2003, President Bush added the common cold to the list of communicable diseases empowering the executive branch, through the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to summarily detain American citizens and prevent them from traveling across state or federal borders.
Executive Order 13375 of April 1, 2005
On April 1, 2005, President Bush signed Executive Order 13375, extending the quarantine power of the Health and Human Services Secretary to include:
“(c) Influenza caused by novel or reemergent influenza viruses that are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic.’’(See Federal Register, Vol. 70, No. 64, p. 17299)
In 2005, the executive branch of the federal government granted itself the power to detain American citizens for the flu.
Executive Order 13674 of July 31, 2014
On July 31, 2014, President Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13674, revising Section b of President Bush's 2003 order. The new text expanded on the definition of SARS [the common cold]:
“(b) Severe acute respiratory syndromes, which are diseases that are associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, are capable of being transmitted from person to person, and that either are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic, or, upon infection, are highly likely to cause mortality or serious morbidity if not properly controlled. This subsection does not apply to influenza.’’See Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 151, p. 45671
Parsed, in 2014, the federal government expanded its power to detain American citizens for common colds, not only if the diseases are "transmitted" but if they are "capable of being transmitted . . . and are causing, or have the potential to cause a pandemic."
That's what made it legally possible for President Trump and President Biden, working through the Centers for Disease Control, to
1. place all Americans — including healthy Americans with no symptoms — under house/business/school arrest;
2. order that healthy Americans wear medical devices (cloth masks) without individual clinical diagnoses, without evidence of efficacy for infection control, and without a personal physician's prescription; and submit to forcible injection of mRNA and DNA toxins.
Combined effect of International Health Regulations and implementing national regulations and executive orders
Explaining the combined effect in the podcast interview, Attorney Todd Callender stated:
“It allows for, in every instance, a suspension of your human rights, your sovereign rights, your Constitutional rights, charter rights."
