This also explains why the DOD needed to decimate their own forces via mRNA poisoning, dismissal of those who refuse the poisoning, and the depraved satanic agenda of DEI. They are weeding out the servicemen with conscience that are not likely to commit atrocities on command, and replacing them with mercenaries from other countries who will have no such scruples.
Here is the good news. Over 200 service members in an open letter are calling for the court-martial of military leaders. Aside from death, there could be no greater condemnation of a military leader. Sasha Latypova writes,
Over 200 service members demand Biden's military leadership be court-martialed and FIRED for forced 'experimentation' on troops with COVID-19 vaccine mandate leaving 'significant' physical and mental scars.
The mandate enacted in August 2021 led to the forced firing of over 8,000 service members who refused the shot on religious or medical grounds.
The service members say their 'suffering continues to be felt financially, emotionally, and physically'.
Biden's military leadership is accused of 'continuing to ignore' their pleas to correct the 'injuries and laws that were broken'.
They are threatening to bring Biden's top leaders out of retirement so they can be court-martialed and held to account.
The letter is damning. I hope this gets traction. Here Latypova highlights key indictments.
While implementing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate, military leaders broke the law, trampled constitutional rights, denied informed consent, permitted unwilling medical experimentation, and suppressed the free exercise of religion. Service members and families were significantly harmed by these actions. Their suffering continues to be felt financially, emotionally, and physically. Some service members became part of our ever-growing veteran homeless population, some developed debilitating vaccine injuries, and some even lost their lives. In an apparent attempt to avoid accountability, military leaders are continuing to ignore our communications regarding these injuries and the laws that were broken.
For GEN Milley, ADM Grady, GEN McConville, ADM Gilday, ADM Lescher, Gen Brown, Gen Berger, Gen Smith, VADM Kilby, VADM Nowell, VADM Fuller, LTG Martin, Lt Gen Davis, MG Edmonson, GEN Williams, ADM Fagan, VADM Buck, Lt Gen Clark, MG Francis, LTG Dingle, Lt Gen Miller, RADM Gillingham, and numerous others;
These individuals enabled lawlessness and the unwilling experimentation on service members. The moral and physical injuries they helped inflict are significant. They betrayed the trust of service members and the American people. Their actions caused irreparable harm to the Armed Forces and the institutions for which we have fought and bled.
These leaders refused to resign or take any other action to hold themselves accountable, nor have they attempted to repair the harm their policies and actions have caused. Since there has yet to be any accountability, the undersigned give our word to do everything morally permissible and legally possible to hold our own leadership accountable. We intend to rebuild trust by demonstrating that leaders cannot cast aside constitutional rights or the law for political expediency.
Here is the letter in its entirety.
There is no let-up.
Last week I posted this video, and thankfully, Latypova found it and has commented on it.
I also believe both federal government and some states such as CA (Newsom) are importing a mercenary army(ies) through the open southern border. There are some reports that they are being imported from far off places such as China - my guess is that recent Xi visit to CA might have had something to do with this. If it is true that China did not use mRNA injections, then maybe they were planning to use their excess male population as mercenary soldiers for sale.
Did you read that last sentence?
If it is true that China did not use mRNA injections, then maybe they were planning to use their excess male population as mercenary soldiers for sale.
Ominous. Adding that
There may be currently 1.5 M to 5M mercenary soldiers already inside the US based on estimates from commentators on the open border situation. For example, Michael Yon has been reporting on this issue:
This also explains why the DOD needed to decimate their own forces via mRNA poisoning, dismissal of those who refuse the poisoning, and the depraved satanic agenda of DEI. They are weeding out the servicemen with conscience that are not likely to commit atrocities on command, and replacing them with mercenaries from other countries who will have no such scruples.
This is from Michael Yon,. Be sure to check out the short video.
PANAMA: the #CCP Economy Collapsing…#Chinese and other children pushed through deadly Darien Gap to come and destroy America. Venezuelan gangsters in the invasion column next to them. The very professional Panamanian Senafront rescues people daily. Senafront is now deep in the jungle with courageous Oscar Blue, Ben Bergquam, and a Mexican journalist named Manuel. The rains are coming down hard now. Senafront is well-trained, highly professional, and strong. I hear one of their helicopters right now. (UH-1
Ben messaged via satcom text: “The scene is truly apocalyptic. Bajo Chiquito is completely overrun (thousands!), possibly as many as Lajas Blancas and more arriving every second! And the amount of feces and trash is staggering. My guess is we passed about 8000 people today between boats, the camp and the jungle. It’s getting dark and they’re still coming. - Ben Bergquam”
Another person mentioned just now 59 busses took about 3080 “migrante” from Darien yesterday.
For everything from anemia to headaches to allergies to having healthy bones and just feeling great all the time, copper is an incredibly important nutrient and this is how to know if you're getting enough.
How to manage your copper status to make sure you're getting enough, not too much, and fix any problems and make sure that whatever your solutions are that they're working. So copper, when you do not have enough you can get anemia that looks just like iron deficiency anemia but isn't, or that looks just like B12 and folate deficiency anemia, but isn't. In fact, you can get malabsorption of iron from copper deficiency that actually causes iron deficiency, and the problem might not be that you don't have enough iron in your diet, it might be that you're not getting enough copper in your diet to absorb the iron, so you could have anemia from that as well as the many other problems of iron deficiency itself. You can have low white blood cells, especially in neutrophils; you can have high cholesterol; you could get osteoporosis because copper is needed to support your bones. You could get histamine intolerance or a greater burden of allergies than you would otherwise have. You could have poor pigmentation of your skin and hair and neurotransmitter imbalances, like low adrenaline or high serotonin that might leave you feeling like you're not your best. So what do you do about this?
1:44. Well, the first thing is look at your diet and see whether the dietary pattern that you have is supporting getting enough copper. The absolute best sources of copper are liver, oysters, shiitake mushrooms, pure chocolate not the stuff watered down with sugar and milk, and spirulina. A tier below that of very good sources of copper are most shellfish besides oysters, remember oysters are the best, whole grains, legumes, and potatoes. Diets that are low in these foods are likely to contribute to a copper deficiency, but soil variation is very large, and all these foods, if they are grown in low copper soil, could be much less likely to give you enough copper. And if you're consuming--if you're not consuming enough of those foods and you are consuming foods from copper-deficient soils, then that makes you very predisposed to copper deficiency. Zinc supplementation, especially over 45 mg a day and with a zinc-to-copper ratio greater than 15 to 1, can be a cause of copper deficiency. Methylation can be a cause of copper deficiency, and I'll link in the description of this episode to my methylation resources.
SOURCES THAT CAUSE COPPER DEFICIENCY
3:08. Other sources of copper deficiency that are not dietary in nature include the use of antacids, proton pump inhibitors, gastric bypass surgery, and any digestive problems that are focused on the upper part of the GI tract like the stomach and the upper part of the small intestine. And although there's limited evidence for this, it seems to be the case that high doses of Vitamin C can impair copper absorption.
COPPER TOXICITY?
On the other hand, there is copper toxicity in general from diet. I do not believe copper toxicity is a concern. If you are supplementing with copper over 10 mg, that could pose a potential risk of copper toxicity. I think it's best to keep copper supplements under 10 mg, preferably under 3 mg a day and it's always best to get your copper from food, and when you do you're benefiting by the fact that the copper is mixed with other minerals, especially zinc, which protects against copper toxicity. It's extremely unlikely to get copper toxicity from food. There are high copper levels in certain water systems, but when they get to the point where they can cause copper toxicity usually drinking that water is going to make you nauseated and it's usually leaving blue colors all over the place. If it's really bad, you can see the blue even coming out in your clothing; so usually you have a warning sign, and certainly using a water filter will generally protect you against too much copper coming from your water supply.
COPPER TESTS
4:51. The most important test of copper status is serum copper this can be supplemented with serum ceruloplasmin; they tend to go together. And so you're usually not getting additional information by combining them. And serum copper tends to be more sensitive to deficiency, so you always want to at least get serum copper but it can be helpful to corroborate it with serum ceruloplasmin. But always get serum copper give that the priority in general low serum copper and low serum ceruloplasmin indicated copper deficiency most of the time. From what I've seen, I think you want to tend to be in the middle of the range because I have seen indications of copper deficiency when people are in the lower 20 or 30% of the range. It's important to note a a couple limitations of these tests first estrogen increases serum ceruloplasmin and tends to increase serum copper as well and that means that there's going to be some fluctuation of copper levels with the menstrual cycle and copper levels are generally twice hi during pregnancy as they are for women who are not pregnant and using hormone replacement therapy estrogen and HRT can raise copper levels by 30 to 90%, and unfortunately there really isn't any clear research to develop a separate reference range for women experiencing high estrogen under these conditions, so what we can say is that if your copper levels are running a little high and you can explain it with estrogen you can probably dismiss it because it's normal. It's probably all the more true in women than in men that you want to be at least towards the middle of the range for copper because if you're at the low and of the range and that might be close to deficiency that's all the more true if you would expect your estrogen levels to be bringing the copper up higher.
GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO COPPER DEFICIENCY
There are two genetic disorders of copper metabolism Menkes Disease and Wilson's Disease
From Global Research. This story revolves around Patrice Lumumba, 1925-January 17, 1961, but it is really a story about U.S. foreign policy in dealing with independent states erupting all over Africa. Later that year, the UN Second Secretary General, Dag Hammarskjold, was killed in a plane crash. It was sabotage. It was an assassination.
The conflict is an old one: Colonial Rule vs. Self-Government. There is/was the British Empire. The Congo was ruled under Belgian colonial rule.
I have learned much about William A.M. Burden II from Peggy and I. I was best acquainted with his 20-year tenure… as Chairman of the Board of the Institute for Defense Analyses [IDA] and his contribution to the quality of the output of this “think tank’s serving the Secretary of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff…His government service reached its apogee during his two years, 1959-61, as Ambassador to Belgium…He has been most responsive over these years also to the needs of Columbia University which he has served as a trustee…” – General and former IDAPresident Maxwell Taylorin foreword to Columbia University Life Trustee William A.M. Burden’s 1982 book, Peggy and I: A Life Too Busy For A Dull Moment
“Before I accepted my ambassadorship in Belgium I had been given in 1957…appointment as ‘a public trustee’ of the Institute for Defense Analyses [IDA]. It became one of the top priorities of my life. I was elected chairman in May 1959. One of the unfortunate side-effects of the student protest movement against the Vietnam War was that IDA itself became a target for anti-war protests, and its member universities were subjected to faculty and student pressure to cancel their ties…” –Columbia University Life Trustee William A.M. Burden in his 1982 book, Peggy and I.
“Only prudent, therefore to plan on the basis that Lumumba Government threatens our vital interests in Congo and Africa generally. A principal objective of our political and diplomatic action must therefore be to destroy Lumumba government as now constituted…” – Columbia University Life Trustee and U.S. Ambassador to Belgium William A.M. Burden in a July 19, 1960 cable to the U.S. State Department.
“The Belgians were sort of toying with the idea of seeing to it that Lumumba was assassinated. I went beyond my instructions and said, well, I didn’t think it would be a bad idea either, but I naturally never reported this to Washington—but Lumumba was assassinated. I think it was all to the good…” –Columbia University Life Trustee William A. M. Burden in a 1968 Oral History Interview with Columbia University School of Journalism’s Advanced International Reporting Program Director, John Luter.
. . .
When Columbia and Barnard students first occupied Hamilton Hall on Columbia University’s campus on Apr. 23, 1968, one of their six demands was “that the university sever all ties with the Institute for Defense Analyses [IDA] and that [then-Columbia] President Kirk and Trustee Burden resign their positions on the Executive Committee of that institution immediately.”
Coincidentally, besides representing Columbia University—with the (now-deceased) Grayson Kirk—on the Executive Committee of the Pentagon’s IDA weapons research think-tank in 1968, Columbia Life Trustee William A.M. Burden was also the U.S. Ambassador to Belgium who recommended fifty-seven years ago, in July 1960, that “a principal objective” of the Republican administration in Washington, D.C. of former Columbia University President Eisenhower “must therefore be to destroy” the democratically-elected “Lumumba government as now constituted” in Belgium’s former Congo [Zaire] colony. As David Talbot recalled in his 2015 book, The Devil’s Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America’s Secret Government:
“Dulles, Doug Dillon (then serving as a State Department undersecretary), and William Burden, the U.S. ambassador to Belgium, led the charge within the Eisenhower administration to first demonize and then dispose of [Patrice] Lumumba. All three men had financial interests in the Congo. The Dillon family’s investment bank handled the Congo’s bond issues. Dulles’s old law firm represented the American Metal Climax (later AMAX), a mining giant with holdings in the Congo…Ambassador Burden was a company director…Ambassador Burden was a Vanderbilt heir…
“Burden, who had acquired his ambassadorship by contributing heavily to the 1956 Eisenhower campaign, spent his days in Brussels attending diplomatic receptions…It was the ambassador who first raised alarms about the rising Patrice Lumumba…Burden began sending agitated cables to Dulles in Washington well before Lumumba’s election…By the…summer [of 1960], Burden was cabling Washington ‘to destroy Lumumba government’ as a threat to ‘our vital interest in Congo.’…”
“…At an NSC [National Security Council] meeting in August 1960, Eisenhower gave [CIA Director Allen] Dulles direct approval to ‘eliminate’ Lumumba. Robert Johnson, the minutes taker at the NSC meeting…said there was nothing ambiguous about Eisenhower’s lethal order. ‘I was surprised that I would ever hear a president say anything like this in my presence or the presence of a group of people’…
“…Lumumba ‘would remain a grave danger,’ Dulles told an NSC meeting on Sept. 21, 1960, ‘as long as he was not yet disposed of.’…”
A Life Trustee of Columbia University since 1956, Burden (who died in 1984) was among the “people in the Eisenhower administration” who “hunted for ways to reduce Lumumba’s influence” and, along with CIA Director Allen Dulles “and the CIA’s man in Leopoldville [Kinshasa],” Larry Devlin, “devised actions,” according to Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Professor of History Emmanuel Gerard and University of Pennsylvania Professor of History Bruce Kuklick’s 2015 book, Death in the Congo: Murdering Patrice Lumumba.
Following his March 1960 trip to the Congo with CIA Station Chief Devlin, “Burden told the Department of State that America could not permit the Congo to go left after independence,” according to Death in the Congo. And after the Congo [Zaire] was granted its formal independence on June 30, 1960, the Columbia Life Trustee–who also “maintained during his ambassadorship, a directorship in American Metal Climax, whose Rhodesian copper interests were to make it the leading corporate defender of a conservative order…in Katanga (where Belgian troops began supporting an illegally-established secessionist regime on July 11, 1960), according to Roger Housen’s 2002 paper “Why Did The US Want To Kill Prime Minister Lumumba Of The Congo?”–began pushing for the removal of the democratically-elected anti-imperialist Lumumba as Congolese Prime Minister in July 1960. As Madeline Kalb observed in her 1982 book, The Congo Cables: The Cold War in Africa:
“The U.S. Embassy in Brussels, replying to the U.S. State Department’s query on July 19…took a very strong line regarding Lumumba, recommending openly for the first time that the United States try to remove him from office. The U.S. ambassador,William Burden, said he believed the situation called for ‘urgent measures on various levels.’…Burden concluded by noting that while the U.S. Embassy in Leopoldville [Kinshasa] had the primary responsibility for dealing with the internal political situation in the Congo, the CIA in Brussels would be ‘reporting separately some specific suggestions.’”
The Death in the Congo book also noted:
“…Burden barraged Washington with memos asking greater sympathy for the [Belgian] imperialists…He understood, he told [then-U.S.] Secretary [of State Christian] Herter, why the United States would look at issues from the point of view of the Congo. Nevertheless, America should instead pressure the UN to support Belgium. At the end of July Burden briefed Dulles when returned to Washington for discussions. From Europe, Burden would continue as a mouthpiece for the more rabid anticommunism guiding Dulles’s report to the NSC [National Security Council]…”
Excellent discussion on the evil of the greater good idea.
What about this argument that we have to lose our freedoms for the common good? Individual and societal evils cannot justify the greater good. They are fundamentally opposed ideas but individuals and people, even churches, can be diluted and scared and traumatized into believing that the harm they do is for the greater or the common good.
Now I have to say that the churches that are demanding vaccine passports cannot be following the same Jesus I follow; they've got to be following some other Jesus because Jesus went out into the crowds touched the lepers and healed them.
By repeating the harms, for example, loss of our freedoms and liberties, the common good delusion is normalized, and the people become desensitized to harm and Evil.
For example, in 1930s Germany, the Nazi party member, Hans B. was writing to his sister in France,
In our nation, the priority is not on the individual and what benefits him, but on the common good, the Volk and Germany.
This is what it led to. Two posters from Nazi Germany " for the common good." Which can easily be interpreted that if there is something about you that is uncommon, or possess a trait that is uncommonly not German, then you belong in another social category.
The one on the left has this healthy, or vaccinated you might say, German guy, holding, as if it is a burden, the disabled on his shoulders. It reads, "A genetically ill [meaning unvaccinated, since the "vaccines" are genetic shots] individual costs approximately 50,000 Reichasmaks by age of 60." Of course, this was eugenics propaganda. On the right,
The Toronto Star employed Ernest Hemmingway when he went to Paris as the Toronto Star correspondent. But now it has become a corrupt woke organization that carries headlines like
"Unvaccinated Patients Do Not Deserve ICU Beds."
and
"I Have No Sympathy for the Willfully Unvaccinated. Let Them Die."
As a physician, I've got to ask, what about the willfully obese? What about the willful smoker? Do patients with alcohol cirrhosis deserve ICU beds? Obviously, they do. As physicians, of course, we tell
This might be hard for people because we're taught that doing things for others, helping out, is a social good. And it is . . . if that good is asked for. We can't do things to others without their consent. In the case with religious folks, some people are called to help no matter what, regardless of what the recipient wants or asks for. In fact, Catholic social teaching tells us to help others. So what the DoD and vaccine manufacturers did was exploit our religious convictions in a campaign that resulted in our injury and loss of freedom. Therefore, these are malicious institutions and should shunned and their slogans must be critically rejected while you keep a guarded eye on them.
My message to everybody is don't comply. If you're asked to wear a mask to get food, to use a bathroom, to get on a flight, don't comply. Don't just resist, but make a scene. Make a big, bad scene. We get the government that we put up with. Put a dent in the pocketbook of any store or airline or restaurant. Don't comply. Do without. Go without. Just as companies have policies, so do you, don't you? When they claim, "Oh, Sir, we have a policy," reply, "Oh, good. So do I." Use the "I." Make it stand up. It'll help you stand for yourself. Use "I." I refuse. I find your policy appalling. I find your policy criminal. And then write a letter describing the incident to the manager if the person who denied you your God-given rights, protected by law, were taken from you. Don't let people take things from you anymore. Please. Those whom you love need you to fight. We're not all in this together. It's only your loved ones that matter. if you get injured, is the "we" going to come to your rescue? No. Is the governor of your state? No. Is the sick-looking public health officer going to come and help you? Ha! Don't make me laugh. No. Throw off that promise that complying is you doing something good for society. Society is not going to reward you. To the collective, no good deed goes unpunished. Don't do it, or don't do anything for the greater good. There is no greater good than your life, and your health, than the role you play to your loved ones. Be a strong friend and resist. Be an example. Be that ally. Be a sister on behalf of your older sister or brother. Be a mother that your sons can respect. Defend your rights. Because the government will not do that. Look at what's happened in Maui. Look at what's happened in Palestine, Ohio. Look at what is happening with the price of everything. You've got to stop obeying the tyrannical government.
This is something. Brian Shilhavy has written a summary, of sorts, of Karen's report.
Also, I was critical of Dr. Robert Malone, because Dr. Glenn Beck confessed that mRNA injections are the gateway into transhumanism. So, what is transhumanism? Malone explained it by making biological changes to the human body and also integrating it with the digital realm. So the biological changes are non-human DNA, and you can read Dr. Malone's patent from 1996 which is "Expression from Exogenous DNA in Mammal Cells," 1996. So in that patent, he was experimenting with a
Ernest Luque is a bodyguard, but she shared with viewers that Luqe is from the Obama administration and is known from the Clinton administration. I mean just wow. Stunning. She posted a worrisome message on her Substack on August 6, 2023.
1982, in Chicago, 7 people died from Tylenol poisoning and a 12-year-old girl. And the mother went down to the police and said you need to seize the Tylenol. And the Deputy Chief said, "I can't do that," and she said, "Yes, you can."
In Florida, Surgeon General Ladapo identified 16,000 Floridians that died from cardiac complications within 6 months. 3,500 within 1 month after getting the nanoparticle technology injections or what they're calling "the vaccines." Why hasn't the Sheriff halted these shots? Why are they going along with this plan? We know that the World Health Organization [owned by the CCP apparently],
So, can a person in the military simply refuse to follow an order if they don't like it?
The answer is yes — if they consider the order itself to be illegal or unconstitutional.
It's generally called a "duty to disobey," and is empowered by the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
The UCMJ is more concerned about the need to obey orders, but specifies the conditions when military personnel may feel justified in not following them:
If the order is "contrary to the constitution" or "the laws of the United States."
If the order is "patently illegal, ... such as one that directs the commission of a crime."
If the military seizes the weapons, meaning the bioweapons of the vaccines, we won't have to be afraid of the next attack. They can aerosolize the vaccines or put something on your skin, like a patch, and call it "Data Vaccine." Reading patents and military documents, when they use weapons of biowarfare, they call it immunization. So if they want to use these lipid nanoparticles to create CNS disability or "to express diseases," they just say "We immunize them." Now, if they use it on their enemies, they'll say "We used it to kill them and take them out.
The gist of it is this: Fifth-generation warfare is an all-out war that is being waged against all of us by our governments and the international organizations to which they belong. It is being waged against each and every one of us right now, and it is a battle for full-spectrum dominance over every single aspect of your life: your movements and interactions, your transactions, even your innermost thoughts and feelings and desires. Governments the world over are working with corporations to leverage technology to control you down to the genomic level, and they will not stop until each and every person who resists them is subdued or eliminated.
The most incredible part of all of this is that so few know that the war is even taking place, let alone that they are a combatant in it.
James Giordano, "The best war field is a friendly field. What does that mean? It means you get your enemy to agree to what is being done to you. So you have a friendly battlefield. And there's no conflict. So if we know that mRNA technologies are harmful, Dr. Malone said as much, but he also said there's nothing that you can do to get them removed immediately because they're killing people, well, now, they have a friendly battlefield because we aren't fighting back. How great is that? Many of our leaders are saying ridiculous things, things, like "This is exclusively a DoD contract and Pfizer just slapped their logo on it." That is not what the DoD contract says. Read 3 Trillion Dollar Substack on "How to Destroy Pfizer in Court," March 5, 2023. The contract says Pfizer is operating completely independent of the U.S. Military and worked directly with the FDA. They say they own the shot, they own the intellectual property, they own the inventory. So we can do something to go after Pfizer, and we can do something to seize these shots, whether it's Pfizer or Mdoerna, out of our communities. But again, when you talk about a friendly battlefield, how would that happen? Well, you would have people working for the enemy infiltrate those who want to push back and say "We want to seize these shots, we want to sue Pfizer, we want to see Albert Bourla in jail." So what do you do? You have people who work for the enemy come into the movement and act like they're our friends, act like they're on our side. I said on Stew Peters, I think, September, October, one of the first times that I was on there, 2021, I am sorry that people don't understand sociopathy. I'm sorry people don't understand that there's evil in the world. But if someone has sociopathy and they have ill intentions for you, they want to harm you, they don't tell you that they plan on harming you. They tell you whatever it is you need to hear so that you trust them. So when people come forward and say that we shouldn't inject children, and now because I put so much pressure on people they're calling it the bioweapon. But our leaders . . . I was the one who had to keep blowing the whistle and not stop to give Americans and global citizens the words to articulate the crime that was done against them and that there was something that they can do. Now, the problem is that none of our leaders are doing anything that can immediately stop this attack. I am, and that's why I am being hunted down today, or the last couple of weeks. I have not been in contact with any friends, or any family, for their own safety. This is the first time that I've turned my cell phone on in 2 weeks. So it's for my safety, and for your safety. But I want you guys to know that I am being hunted down. And I would ask that Dr. Robert Malone, you're friends with people in the CIA, for the love of humanity, call off your friends at the CIA. This is who is hunting me down, and they're doing this to intimidate people. I was set up to be poisoned by that Florida rental. I forgive my friends who set me up there. I know that you were threatened. And people are saying, "Well, Karen, why are you still doing this? And this may be the last time you guys ever see me." I knew what I signed up for. I chose to sacrifice instead of suffer. So when you sacrifice, you give everything, including your life, right, for the greater good? I chose to do that instead of suffer. People going along with the plan out of intimidation, or for whatever reason, they're suffering, right, because when you suffer you're not willing to give up whatever you're afraid to lose. You're afraid to lose stuff, so you suffer through the slings and arrows, and for me, I gave everything up to God. I shouldn't be here today. I am protected because of God. I know the CIA, the FBI, the Clintons, and Obama apparently are like, "What the hell is she doing still being alive?" And I just praise God. I've been reading Psalms every day read by King David, and I've been praying over and over it. And again, if you're wondering where I am, I am in Barcelo Maya, Mexico
because I was not safe in the United States because of all of those cameras throughout Southern California and Collier County in Florida. It's ridiculous. You're tracked everywhere. So I came somewhere I thought I was safe, but I am not safe anywhere. People know where I am. Again, my room gets sprayed, my water gets contaminated, and my food does as well. I don't know. Miki Willis, if you're listening . . . ? Steve Kirsch . . . ? Mike Adams, please talk to Dr. Malone to call off the CIA. He's friends with them. Call off the CIA from hunting her down for the love of humanity, and I'd like to know who told the CIA to me? I'll never find out, but I would like to know who said "She's a threat to our objectives, make her go away." I did do an interview with Bobby Kennedy on November 3, 2022.
No one was told they were being injected with nanoparticle technologies. They thought it was a biological agent. And the FDA classifies these technologies as electromagnetic devices. No one was told they were being injected with electromagnetic devices.
After her appearance on the Stew Peters Show, Mikki Willis tells her to stop criticizing the FDA approval of happened . . . and stop criticizing Dr. Robert Malone. What, is he above criticism? I'm not criticizing him. I was criticizing his interpretation, which was a false, reckless interpretation of contracts and the law. Willis told her that if she doesn't stop criticizing Malone that she won't be part of this team anymore. And then Mike Adams, so nice, such a sweet guy, called me and told me that I need to stop criticizing Dr. Malone because Dr. Malone may sue her. To that, she says that she hasn't said anything that she merely repeats what he said, things he said on Joe Rogan.
PREP Act was a law launched in 2002, and amended in 2005 that allows the HHS Secretary to issue a declaration to expand this liability shield for using unapproved medical interventions, devices, pharmaceuticals, all sorts of things, diagnostics, therapeutics, anything, using the Emergency Use Authorization essential to bypassing the normal regulatory frameworks and consumer safeguards, which are quite extensive today for very good reasons because we want to make sure that the medications are being used as safe. So this is a shield essentially that the government uses and now, specifically, the DoD is using extensively to shield themselves and anyone that they hire for the task from any liability from using these poorly tested, untested, experimental, and completely black box, devices, and technologies.
8:50 Dr. Meryl Nass. The Defense Department has been accustomed to doing whatever it wants and has a history of using untested products on soldiers. In the Gulf War, they got a memorandum of understanding with the FDA that allowed them to use products that were unapproved and unevaluated by the FDA and at other times in the past also. The DoD is kind of a law unto itself. So for them, this was nothing new. It was just happening on a larger scale. It wasn't just 2 million soldiers, but it was also 134 million Americans. But then this method was shipped out to the rest of the world, so 8 billion people.
9:42 Polly Tommey. Why have we called this program, "Willful Misconduct"? What is the purpose behind that?
9:48 Latypova. I think it's because of the George Watts case v. Lloyd J. Austin, III, in other words, the DoD. His estate is suing the Dept. of Defense for his death. The only basis that we have to break this liability shield, a very extensive one, is based on willful misconduct. So the case complaint was that the willful misconduct was essentially a bait-and-switch scheme that the Department of Defense and Health and Human Services, HHS, ran on the American public.
11. PREP provides blanket immunity for covered persons such as the DOD with a sole exception for willful misconduct the enumerated sovereign immunity for the United States and an agency such as the DOD (42 U.S.C. 247d-6d(f)) is unconstitutional since for closing all redress violates due process enshrined in the 5th Amendment and it's central promise and assurance that all levels of American government must abide by the law and provide fair procedures particularly in instances such as this where Mr Wash was "deprived of life." The enumerated sovereign immunity for the United States and an agency such as the DOD has is also an unconstitutional taking in violation of the Fifth Amendment. A "legal cause of action is property within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment."
So, now we have a death of a civilian from disregard for safety and using this PREP Act liability shield, and his attorneys are stating that "Well because this was willful misconduct because knowingly the Department of Defense administered, distributed the experimental product while telling everyone it was FDA approved. And that was the lie that they perpetrated on this young man who died as a result of it.
11:00 Dr. Meryl Nass. The way that the PREP Act is written, there are almost no requirements for safety or efficacy. What it requires is that the FDA, and the FDA issues it, simply believe, with or without evidence, that the benefits are going to be greater than the risks. But it does say that the FDA needs to disclose the known significant risks. And the FDA did not do that. So the FDA was hiding many of the known risks. But the other thing that happened was a bait-and-switch. So in August of 2021, the Federal government announced all these mandates but only at the time that FDA approved a license for the Pfizer vaccine. So on August 23, the FDA issued a license for the Pfizer vaccine for adults, but none of that product was made available in the United States. So every body continued to get the Emergency Use product with a huge liability shield and the only potential way to litigate against them was to prove willful misconduct which was they knew they were doing something wrong but they hid it. So what we're saying is, yes, they knew that the product being administered to George Watt and to everybody else in the country was not licensed, but the FDA, the DoD, and the rest of the Federal government pretended that it was.
12:32 Tommey. And this is Children's Healt Care case, correct? Yep.
And the reason you're on here is because your lawyer can't talk about it.
12:50 Latypova. I think it's a great case because, finally, in my opinion, a correct defendent is named, in other words, which is the DoD and Lloyd J. Austin, III, the U.S. Secretary of Defense, who were the head of the operation, while the pharmaceutical companies are complicit and knowingly administered poisons because they are experts and they understand exactly what they are doing and know what consumer safeguards have been subverted. But they are operating under the Department of Defense who was heading Operation Warp Speed, OWS, now it's been renamed to Acceleration of Countermeasures, another name but essentially the same thing.
[Huh. The federal government is notorious for renaming projects and programs. Remember when the Iraq invasion was initially named Operation Iraqi Liberation with the acronym of O.I.L.? They're always trying to show how clever they are when in reality they're stupid monsters.]
This was at the time that these shots were rolled out and relevant to George Watts' case this was headed by the Department of Defense, Chief Operation Officer was General Gustave F. Perna, reporting directly to President Trump. Structurally, the same reporting system reporting to Biden. The Dept. of Defense leadership represents about 2/3 of Operation Warp Speed, most of them without any health care experience. So this was all orchestrated from there, using several legal framework of several laws, so the PREP Act is one of them. But there are others, such as Public Health Emergency Declaration to begin with, and the Emergency Use Authorization
Written by Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani during preparation for the Second Vatican Council that began in 1963.
Why is knowledge of traditional Catholic doctrine on the proper relationship between Church and State important for men and women working to dismantle the globalist police state revealed through Covid-19?
The people who planned and launched the Covid-19 cull-and-control war on humanity, allied with Satan in opposition to Almighty God, could not have done it if the Roman Catholic Church had not been eviscerated beforehand, to remove the Church as a worldwide force for societal and spiritual protection of human beings.
Covert inversions of Church authority, teachings, traditions, laws and liturgy were necessary preconditions for the covert inversions of civil authority and civil law that followed, just as the inversion of civil authority and civil law were necessary preconditions for the establishment of fraud, theft, torture, slavery and murder as global State policy and practice.
Corollary:
The globalists’ project — to continue using fraud, torture and murder to consolidate earthly power, ruin human lives, and damn human souls — will advance and spread for as long as the Roman Catholic Church remains in a corrupt state of moral incoherence about the proper relationship between Church and State.
Put another way, the Roman Catholic Church is the only human institution on the face of the earth that has ever had, and still has, the capacity to stand in pastoral defense of the temporal lives and immortal souls of human beings, against the depredations of Satan and the idolatrous technocratic State.
Specifically, “public health” laws are, in truth, anti-laws that falsely claim to legalize fraud, theft, torture, slavery and murder by using false rubrics about the common good, charity, justice, civil authority, and the relationship between man and society.
"The instinct of justice in the human heart is so deep that, even in great deeds of injustice, the villains wear the mantle of justice." - Life of Christ, Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen (1954)
At the same time, it’s become far more discernible — as revealed by Covid-19 and strong participation in the global fraud, torture and mass murder campaign by Catholic institutional leaders — that reforms to Church doctrine, teachings, and liturgy adopted since the 1960s are, in truth, covert mechanisms that have almost completely eliminated the earthly, pastoral power of the Church to cooperate with divine grace, uphold divine law, and protect the flock of the Good Shepherd from being deceived, tortured, killed and eternally damned.
More succinctly: Conversion of civil law to civil anti-law was made possible by intentional, planned changes to Church doctrine and function, and civil laws have failed to protect victims from State criminals, because the Church has failed to properly guide the State in the exercise of legislative, executive, judicial and law enforcement functions.
In an appendix, Archbishop Lefebvre published a translation of a theological schema written by Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani during two years of preparation for the Second Vatican Council, which began in October 1963.
The Ottaviani schema proposed a framework for the council to transmit many centuries of Catholic teaching about the proper relationship between Church and State in both Catholic and non-Catholic countries, from antiquity and the Middle Ages into the modern world.
The Ottaviani schema was set aside during council deliberations in favor of alternatives that untethered State civil authority from Catholic doctrine but obscured the untethering through deceptively-worded theological documents.
Just as public health laws have untethered State civil authority from its proper function (protection of the temporal well-being of citizens and support for their moral and spiritual development) to instead exercise false liberties (theft, enslavement, corruption and murder), and obscured the untethering from public view through deceptively-worded legal instruments.
Archbishop Lefebvre was a vigorous participant in Vatican Council deliberations, fighting at Cardinal Ottaviani’s side for the preservation of sound Catholic tradition against indifferentist, liberal, modernist, Communist, and other errors. He witnessed the infiltration and corruption of the process and incisively anticipated (and then documented) the rotten fruits that would be borne of the disfigured branches in the decades that followed the close of the council in December 1965.
To the extent that a “re-set” of human civilization is underway, the Ottaviani schema is a useful moral and historical benchmark buried by 60 years of intentional sand-kicking by Bank for International Settlements (BIS) owners, Freemasons, and their colleagues in many other transnational secret organizations.
As Archbishop Lefebvre wrote in his introductory note:
“[The Ottoviani schema] represents the state of Catholic doctrine on the eve of Vatican II and expresses substantially the doctrine that the Council would have had to propose if it had not been turned away from its purpose by the coup d'Etat of those who made of it the "States general of the people of God," a second 1789.”
On the Relations Between the Church and the State and On Religious Tolerance. (PDF)
Most Eminent and Reverend Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani, Chairman
N.B. The doctrinal schema presented by Cardinal Ottaviani comprised in its original Latin version was 7 pages of text and 16 pages of references, going from Pius VI (1790) to John XXIII (1959). It was set aside from the first session of the Council, to the benefit of the schema drawn up by the Secretariat for Christian Unity under Cardinal Bea. This latter schema, which was intended to be pastoral, extended to 14 pages, without any reference to the Magisterium1that preceded it.
The Ottaviani schema does not enjoy a magisterial authority, but it represents the state of Catholic doctrine on the eve of Vatican II and expresses substantially the doctrine that the Council would have had to propose if it had not been turned away from its purpose by the coup d'Etat of those who made of it the "States general of the people of God," a second 1789!2
Let us add finally that the Council would have been able to bring to this statement all useful points of precision or improvements.
1. Principle: Distinction between the Church and civil society, and subordination of the goal of the city to the goal of the Church.
Man, destined by God for a supernatural end, needs both the Church and civil society to attain his full perfection. Civil society, to which man belongs because of his social character, must watch over earthly goods and act in such a way that, on this earth, the citizens can lead a "calm and peaceful life."
The Church, into which man must incorporate himself because of his supernatural vocation, has been founded by God in order that, always expanding more and more, it may lead its faithful by its doctrine, its sacraments, its prayer, and its laws, to their eternal end.
Each of these two societies is rich with the necessary resources to accomplish its own mission as it should. Each is also perfect, that is to say, supreme in its class and thus, independent of the other, holding the legislative, judicial, and executive powers. This distinction of the two cities, as a constant tradition teaches it, rests on the words of the Lord: "Render therefore to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's."
Nevertheless, as these two societies exercise their power over the same persons and often with regard to one same object, they cannot ignore each other. They must even proceed in perfect harmony, in order to flourish themselves, no less than their common members.
The Holy Council, with the intention of teaching which relations must exist between these two powers, according to the nature of each of them, declares in the very first place the firm obligation of holding that both the Church and civil society have been instituted for the usefulness of man; that temporal happiness, entrusted to the care of the civil authority, nevertheless is worth nothing for man if he is going to lose his soul.
Therefore the end of civil society must never be sought by excluding or by endangering the ultimate end, namely, eternal salvation.
2. The power of the Church and its limits; the duties of the Church toward the civil authority.
As the power of the Church thus extends to everything that leads men to eternal salvation; as that which concerns only temporal happiness is placed, as such, under the civil authority; it follows from this that the Church is not concerned with temporal realities, except to the extent they are ordered to the supernatural end. As for the acts ordered to the end of the Church as well as to that of the city, like marriage, the education of children, and other similar things, the rights of the civil authority must be exercised in such a way that, in the judgment of the Church, the higher goods of the supernatural order do not undergo any injury.
In the other temporal activities which, divine law remaining unharmed, can be considered or accomplished legitimately and diverse manners, the Church does not interfere with them in any way. Guardian of its own rights, perfectly respectful of the rights of others, the Church does not reckon that there belongs to it the choice of a form of government, or that of the institutions proper to the civil domain of the Christian nations: of the diverse forms of government, it does not disapprove of any, on the condition that religion and morals are safe. Likewise, indeed, as the Church does not renounce its own liberty, in the same way it does not prevent the civil authority from freely making use of its laws and its rights.
What great benefits the Church procures for civil society while accomplishing its mission, the heads of nations should recognize. Indeed, the Church itself cooperates in the citizens becoming good by their virtue and their Christian piety. If they are such as Christian doctrine prescribes, in the testimony of St. Augustine, beyond any doubt, great will be the public welfare. The Church also imposes onto the citizens the obligation of complying with legitimate orders "not only through fear of chastisement, but from a motive of conscience."
As for those to whom the government of the country has been entrusted, it warns them of the obligation to exercise their function, not through the desire for power, but for the good of the citizens, as having to render an account to God, of their power received from God. Finally, the Church inculcates the observance as well of the natural laws as of the supernatural ones, thanks to which all civil order, and order among citizens and among the nations, can be realized in peace and in justice.
3. Religious duties of the civil authority.
The civil authority cannot be indifferent with regard to religion. Instituted by God in order to help men acquire a truly human perfection, it must not only supply its subjects with the possibility of procuring temporal goods for themselves, either material or intellectual, but besides favor the abundance of spiritual goods, permitting people to lead a human life in a religious manner.
Now, among these goods, nothing is more important than to know and to recognize God, and then to fulfill one's duties towards God: here indeed is the foundation of all private and, still more, public virtue.
These duties towards God oblige, towards the divine Majesty, not only each one of the citizens but also the civil authority, which, in its public acts, incarnates civil society. God is indeed the author of civil society and the source of all the goods which flow down through it to its members. Civil society must therefore honor and serve God. As for the manner of serving God, this can be no other, in the present economy, than that which He Himself has determined, as obligatory, in the true Church of Christ; and this not only in the person of the citizens, but equally in that of the Authorities who represent civil society.
That the civil authority has the power to recognize the true Church of Christ is clear from the manifest signs of its divine institution and mission, signs given to the Church by its divine Founder. The civil authority also, and not only each of the citizens, has the duty of accepting the Revelation proposed by the Church itself. Likewise, in its legislation, it must conform itself to the precepts of the natural law and take a strict account of the positive laws, both divine and ecclesiastical, intended to lead men to supernatural happiness.
Just as no man can serve God in the manner established by Christ if he does not know clearly that God has spoken through Jesus Christ, likewise civil society itself cannot do this, if the citizens do not have at first a sure knowledge of the fact of Revelation, just like the civil authority, to the extent that it represents the people.
It is thus, in a very particular way, that the civil authority must protect the full liberty of the Church and not prevent it in any way from integrally carrying out its mission, either in the exercise of its sacred Magisterium, or in the arrangement and performance of its worship, or in the administration of the sacraments and the pastoral care of the faithful. The freedom of the Church must be recognized by the civil authority in everything that concerns its mission, especially in the choice and the formation of its aspirants to the priesthood; in the election of its bishops; in the free and mutual communication between the Roman Pontiff and the bishops and the faithful; in the foundation and the government of institutes of the religious life; in the publication and propagation of writings; in the possession and administration of temporal goods; as also, in a general way, in all those activities which the Church, without disregarding civil rights, judges appropriate for leading men towards their ultimate end, not making an exception of secular education, social works and so many other miscellaneous resources.
Finally, it devolves seriously upon the civil authority to exclude from legislation, government, and public activity everything which it would judge to be capable of impeding the Church from attaining its eternal end; indeed further, it must apply itself to facilitating the life which is founded on principles that are Christian and consistent at their highest point with this sublime end for which God has created men.
4. General principle of application of the doctrine set forth.
That the ecclesiastical authority and the civil power maintain different relations according to the manner in which the civil authority, personally representing the people, understands Christ and the Church founded by Him -- this is what the Church has always recognized.
5. Application in a Catholic City.
The whole doctrine, put forth above by the Holy Council, cannot be applied except in a city where the citizens not only are baptized but profess the Catholic Faith. In this case, it is the citizens themselves who freely choose that civil life be formed according to Catholic principles and that thus, as St. Gregory the Great says, "The road to Heaven be more widely opened."
Nevertheless, even in these fortunate conditions, the civil authority is not permitted in any way to compel consciences to accept the Faith revealed by God. Indeed, the Faith is essentially free and cannot be the object of any constraint, as the Church teaches by saying, "That no one be compelled to embrace the Catholic Faith unwillingly."
Still, this does not prevent the civil authority from having to procure the intellectual, social and moral conditions required in order that the faithful, even those less versed in knowledge, be able to persevere more easily in the Faith received. Thus then, in the same way that the civil authority judges that it has the right to protect public morality, likewise, in order to protect the citizens against the seductions of error, in order to keep the city in the unity of Faith, which is the supreme good and the source of manifold, even temporal, benefits, the civil authority can, by itself, regulate and moderate the public manifestations of other cults and defend its citizens against the spreading of false doctrines, which, in the judgment of the Church, put their eternal salvation at risk.
6. Religious tolerance in a Catholic city.
In this safeguarding of the true Faith, one must proceed according to the requirements of Christian charity and of prudence, in order that the dissidents be not alienated from the Church through terror, but rather drawn to it; and that neither the city nor the Church undergo any damage. Therefore, both the common good of the Church and the common good of the State always have to be considered, by virtue of which a just tolerance, even sanctioned by laws, can, according to the circumstances, be imposed onto the civil authority.
This, on the one hand, would be in order to avoid greater evils, such as scandal or civil war, a hindrance to conversion to the true Faith, and other evils of this kind; on the other hand, in order to obtain a greater good, like civil cooperation and the peaceful coexistence of citizens of different religions, a greater freedom for the Church, and a more effective accomplishment of its supernatural mission, and other similar goods.
In this question, there must be taken into consideration not only the good of national order, but the welfare of the universal Church (and of international civil welfare). By this tolerance, the Catholic authority imitates the example of divine Providence, which permits evils from which it draws greater goods. This tolerance is to be observed chiefly in countries where, for centuries, there have existed non-Catholic communities.
7. Application in a Non-Catholic City.
In the cities where a great part of the citizens do not profess the Catholic Faith or do not even know the fact of Revelation, the non-Catholic civil authority must, in matters of religion, conform at least to the precepts of the natural law. Under these conditions, this non-Catholic authority should concede civil liberty to all the forms of worship that are not opposed to natural religion. This liberty is not opposed in such a case to Catholic principles, it being given that it suits the good of the Church as well as that of the State.
In the cities where the Authorities do not profess the Catholic religion, the Catholic citizens have above all the duty to bring it about, through their virtues and civic actions. By means of these, united with their fellow citizens, they promote the common good of the State, that there be granted to the Church the full freedom to accomplish its divine mission. From the free action of the Church, indeed, the non-Catholic city also suffers no harm and even derives numerous and remarkable benefits. In this way, then, the Catholic citizens must do their best so that the Church and the civil authority, although still separated juridically, lend each other a mutual benevolent aid.
In order not to harm either the Church or the State through unconcern or imprudent zeal, the Catholic citizens, in the defense of the rights of God and of the Church, must submit to the judgment of the ecclesiastical authority: to it belongs judgment on the good of the Church, according to the diverse circumstances, and the directing of Catholic citizens in the civil actions intended to defend the altar.
8. Conclusion
The Holy Council recognizes that the principles of the mutual relations between the ecclesiastical authority and the civil authority must not be applied otherwise than according to the rule of conduct given forth above. Nevertheless, it cannot permit these same principles to be obscured by some false laicism, even under pretext of the common good.
These principles, indeed, rest on the absolute and firm rights of God; on the unchangeable constitution and mission of the Church; also on the social nature of man, which, remaining always the same throughout the centuries, determines the essential purpose of civil society itself, notwithstanding the diversity of political systems and the other vicissitudes of history.
[KW note] Magisterium. "The perennial, authentic, and infallible teaching office committed to the Apostles by Christ and now possessed and exercised by their legitimate successors, the college of bishops in union with the pope." Source.
[KW note] 1789 is a reference to the French Revolution and the Declaration of the Rights of Man, which furthered the separation between Church and State to the detriment of both.