Showing posts with label Keir Starmer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Keir Starmer. Show all posts

Sunday, October 19, 2025

TIME & PLACE: That's why I think in the UK if everyone is subjected to a digital ID, it'll be worse than China, because they're running out of options. We already have one of the highest tax rates in the world, 40 to 45%, and there's only so much more they can raise from that.


Let's talk about digital ID I mainly lived in England but I also spent time in China where digital ID is everywhere and it's obvious to me that the English people the British people are being told a lie about what really digital ID is about right now they're telling you it's to stop illegal migration to stop illegals from working and to be able to provide easier access to services but these are all manufactured issues and they're being used as excuses to convince you that digital ID is the solution.
For too many years, it's been too easy for people to come here, slip into the shadow economy, and remain here illegally.  We do need to know who is in our country.  This government will make a new, free-of-charge, digital ID mandatory for the right to work.  --Keir Starmer
But it doesn't make any sense.  We already have passports, national Insurance numbers, and rights work checks when you look for a job, when you apply for a job.  Illegal migrants can still find work because their employers are not asking for ID they know it's illegal.  So by introducing further measures, it only applies to ordinary people.  And I think the prime minister and the people involved in this project they know that people are not buying it because now they are shifting their tone, they're making it sound like it's for you so you can have easier access to public services.
Not least because it means that you can access your own money, make payments so much more easily than is available with others.  So I think now we need to go out and make the case of the huge benefits that will this will bring.  There needs to be a national debate about it, but I think that the more people see the benefits that come with this, the more as has happened in other countries, people say that will make my life easier and therefore I want to get on with it.  --Keir Starmer
In China, they don't try to sugarcoat it everyone knows it's about surveillance and control but it works for China because it's authoritarian by design. Everyone has agreed to have freedom within boundaries.  They know what they can say, what they can't say, and what they can't do and what happens when they cross the line.  Because the law has consequences, and people stay within it.  It's strict but it's predictable.
Out of a possible 950 points, a score in the 700s is considered good.  Around the 500 mark is not.  For now, the number is sort of bank credit rating.  Keeping track of everyone's spending habits.  'I think being ranked is a good thing.  A society has to have rules.'  In theory, everything can be taken into account in the social score, even the most innocuous errands like supermarket shopping. When  Shiawin Wong makes an electronic payment, her purchases tell the state a lot about her. Buying cigarettes would count against her.  On the other hand, nappies show she's an attentive mother.  Beer could indicate alcoholism; she'd be better off buying water.
But that's not going to work for the UK.  The mindset, the people are very different. This is the birthplace of Magna Carta.  We don't want big government. They're trying to sell you the idea of modernization and efficiency, but that's not the end goal.  I think they're trying to create a centralized digital footprint for everybody, linking your money, your movement, and all your records.  This way they can find new ways to tax you more because that's what the UK government is run on, taxes, taxes from you.  That's why I think in the UK if everyone is subjected to a digital ID, it'll be worse than China, because they're running out of options.  We already have one of the highest tax rates in the world, 40 to 45%, and there's only so much more they can raise from that. Eventually once digital ID kicks in, it'll make it easier for them to be able to tax your assets, a wealth tax, and if more countries sign up to this just leaving the UK wouldn't be enough because there will be cooperation.  There will be cross border taxes with digital ID, making it easier.  In China, digital ID connects everything from your travel cards to your banks to what food you order from delivery apps.  If you break the law, break the rules, they can restrict access to your services and freeze your accounts because everything is made digitally. 99% of China doesn't use cash anymore.  Everything is digital on your phone, mobile payments, and it's all linked to a digital ID.  Once digital ID comes in and everything is digitalized and centralized, they'll know how much you have and how much they can take from you.  This is very worrying for the UK because this is supposed to be a democracy.  But over the past year, 12,000 people have been arrested for offensive comments and that's before digital ID comes into place.  Once it's introduced, every comment, every post will be linked back to your digital ID.  So my thoughts are it's not going to work for the UK, and it's not in the best interests of its people. 

Monday, June 24, 2024

The gist from Luongo

Ultimately, Davos cannot deviate from their Gantt chart of their takeover of the West lest they get torn apart like a narc at a biker rally (H/T Dennis Miller). This is why Mark Rutte is being moved from being PM of The Netherlands to NATO Gen. Sec. and why Jens Stoltenberg is moving to the Norwegian Central Bank.

The wildcard here is quickly becoming Nigel Farage in the UK, who could embarrass them again like he did in 2016 with Brexit. Regardless of the outcome of the elections, Farage, Geert Wilders, Marine Le Pen in France and others will all be blamed for a European sov. debt crisis that was baked into the financial cake (and Gantt chart) ages ago.

The big news item for me this week all center on Europe.  U. S. domestic politics at this point are pretty much obvious.  They're trying to do everything imaginable to stop Donald Trump from becoming president and they are failing miserably. I could have just as easily put Nigel Farage up here and talked about next week's election in France and the U.K.  I was all over Twitter yesterday because Nigel Farage came out on national television and basically came out and said, "We provoked Putin into a war, and that's just the reality of it, and if you don't like it, well, you know it's the truth.  

And Farage knows what he's doing.  He's time-tested that idea for a long, long time.  I said I wouldn't talk about Farage, but here I am going on about him already.  Farage's Reform Party is making sincere strides in the polls.  I don't know if he's going to have the kind of coattails that will allow him to really upset the apple cart in the U.K., meaning the planned coronation of Keir Starmer with a massive Labor majority which he'll use to destroy what's left of the U.K. and make it subservient to Davos in Europe.  Well, that's the most likely scenario, but if Reform comes in with 150 or 200 seats, that's going to be an earthshattering result even though it will leave Starmer in a huge majority position, Nigel Farage leading the opposition Party in the U.K. government, aside from the fact that it would be hilariously entertaining, would be tremendous.  Now, at the same time, this is a lead into what's happening in NATO.  I was asked directly by people to discuss Mark Ruta