Tuesday, September 2, 2025

KEVIN MCKERNAN: [Pfizer] knew this was going to happen, and they quickly went out and acquired cancer companies. They put $43 billion dollars into the acquisition of Seagen and they put $2.26 billion dollars to acquire Trillium Therapeutics

This is not conspiracy theory. This has been published in the BMJ by Retsef Levy, and they go through this process, one, where they ran these vaccines in trial and how they changed that when they decided to go and inject the rest of the world.  This is traditionally a mortal sin in vaccine manufacturing or in any sort of biological manufacturing.  The process is the product.  You change the process, you have to go through trials again, and the EMA even asked them to do that although they failed to.  They asked for another trial of 250 people once they changed the process, and that data was never delivered.  So this bait and switch is very important for you to understand why the trial data is of absolute zero consequence to what we're actually saying in the field. Those numbers are a caricature of what they're actually doing with these injections.  

They know something.  Pfizer very early on they had the data on this from the trial.  They knew this was going to happen and they quickly went out and acquired cancer companies. They put $43 billion dollars into the acquisition of Seagen and they put $2.26 billion dollars to acquire Trillium Therapeutics.  Trillium was focused on blood cancers that have a CD147 marker on them, okay?  That is one of the markers that is known to be involved in COVID, so they have a very interesting window on those malignancies and they're buying up the cancer companies that are probably going to play the biggest role in benefiting from the mess that they've created.  

1:33. So in summary, the Pfizer vaccines on the market are not the same formulation as what was tested in the clinical trials.  This is a big bait and switch and it's a fraud.  So you can't believe anything they're saying about the vaccine efficiency, which we have seen even those numbers decay over time.  This is probably why. They're not really what they trialed.  They gave you something different.  There is significant DNA contamination that's found, like 10 out of 11 studies have found this, and the ones that haven't found it have some financial conflicts.  So I think the consensus is out: 10 out of 10 of the real studies are finding this.  Several are through peer review, which have not been easy to get through peer review. The peer review journals do not like these papers.  They get beat around in peer review for months to years, but they're making their way out now. There is also significant DNA contamination now found in 5 peer reviewed studies that were not looking at this.  They were looking at people's blood and tissue and it was accidentally in there.  Other people had to go sleuth it out.  We've got cancer on the rise, and there are several papers that report cancer post- vaccination, like right at the site of injections you'll see neoplasms, all right?  So there's something going on here.  This can't be ignored, saying it's a coincidence anymore.  Now this is, these are liability free and they're often mandated, okay?  So this maybe the largest carcinogenic hit ever to the human population.  And we have these on childhood schedules.  We are giving these to pregnant women.  This has gone absolutely off the rails.  

No comments:

Post a Comment