Monday, June 12, 2023

COVID injections are not subject to any normal pharmaceutical regulatory rules. This is what prevents the gov't, or the FDA, from starting any investigations of them despite signals of harm

This was interesting. When the FDA made comments on TV, newspapers, online, etc, they talked about the vaccines as though they had authoritative approval but they did not by the very definition set by HHS.  So when they talked about the vaccines, they lied, because they don't have that authority.  

"So when [the] FDA... says 'Oh, you know, we reviewed COVID-19 vaccines rigorously and they're safe and effective, they're lying in many, many ways here and the first way that they're lying is that they're actually talking about them [the injections] as if they have regulatory authority over this matter. They don't," Latypova says.

Because the supposed "clinical trials" for the injections were not in the Scope of Work (SoW) described in the contracts signed between the DOD and pharma companies like Pfizer,****** they have been irrelevant to the injections actually going into people's bodies. The "vaccine development and approval could be named for a movie or a theater production or a show," Latypova says. She adds, "There is no vaccine development and approval because these products are not pharmaceuticals, they're not vaccines, they're countermeasures under EUA under public health emergency, they're not subject to any regulation. Especially not pharmaceutical regulation." Latypova notes that "Legally, there are no clinical trial subjects or investigators and therefore there has never been informed consent for these things. And what FDA is really doing is they're impersonating the regulators and lying to the public." She adds, "not... all 15,000 employees of the FDA are aware of this, but I know that a few at the top... have been briefed and they know what they're doing. So they're impersonating regulators and they're lying to their own employees..."


No comments:

Post a Comment