Friday, November 1, 2024

BREAKING: 4-STAR GENERAL STANLEY MCCHRYSTAL ENDORSED "the coup of the coup, Kommie-la."

In other words, the ISAF commander, who, in executing “population-centric COIN,” the doctrine that valued (Afghan) population protection over (U.S.) force protection, is probably responsible for more Dismounted Complex Blast Injuries (dismembered US soldiers) than any other commander in history has endorsed the coup of the coup, Kommie-la.

ISAF is the International Security Assistance Force.  

"I would love to be able to live on a homestead and go and milk my cow, take the eggs out of the chicken coop and have one baby in my belly and on my hip and another toddler behind me"

OWEN BENJAMIN: Free will cannot be taken, it has to be given.

My prediction. Trump wins and they attempt to nullify it with the 14th Amendment [Section 3]. It disqualifies former officials if they took part in an insurrection.
It will hurt more if it’s after he wins. Especially if it’s a landslide.
It will appear that the people's choice is being rejected by an invisible cabal of baby-eating reptiles. This will be intended to create hopelessness and break apart families.
This will be fought about for years and will offer Americans an excuse to be unproductive miserable and resentful. This is an offer, it’s always an offer. If you accept it and people don’t want to hang around you anymore and you get fired it’s not the “deep state.”
I warned everyone not to take part in January 6th. I called that Biden may win and they would make it look like it was obviously stolen to create an animalistic blowback.
If you realize that the fact is this presentation is for social engineering you will see how it works better. Free will cannot be taken it has to be given.
People who crave power and who don’t possess the qualities that make people want to give them authority have to trick people into acting like miserable pigs so they can get it by default.
It’s why despair, sin, vulgarity, wrath, and greed are pushed. If you become animalistic you lose your authority.
Hope that helps. Not trying to sound like a “know it all” because I’m not, but I’m a “know a lot.”

NAOMI BROCKWELL: Surveillance has dangerous psychological consequences -- yet we're creating a world without privacy. We aren't passive enjoyers of tech, we have say in its direction. Let's write a better future.

People become defensive instead of open-minded.  Admitting to a change in our beliefs might seem like a weakness in the face of ever-present digital history.  And knowing that our actions are constantly monitored and recorded can make us refrain from exploring new ideas, or questioning the status quo because we fear the potential repercussions or judgment based on our digital trail with every digital action being scrutinized, there's a subtle push toward conformity.  It becomes safer to follow the herd than to stand out or challenge prevailing norms and this leads to a society that values uniformity of individual thought.  This new-found digital shadow haunts us.  Instead of spontaneous expressions or genuine searches for knowledge, we might lean toward actions that look better in our digital profile.  There is this subtle internalization that our digital self is in some way more important than our real self.  In a world like this, open authenticity becomes scarce, replaced by curated personalities for digital consumption.  These are profound shifts in the collective psyche of society that we need to be aware of . . . .  --Naomi Brockwell

Privacy is a vaunted goal to get after.  But surveillance is so far developed that it is hard to imagine privacy winning.  

In our communities, police forces in squad cars have receded in favor of crowd-sourced surveillance.

"Crowd-Sourced Suspicion Apps Are Out of Control," Matthew Guariglia, Electronic Frontier Foundation, October 21, 2021.

"Community Surveillance Apps,"

"Networked Self-Defense and Monetized Vigilantism: Private Surveillance Systems," Elizabeth E. Joh, SSRN, July 26, 2021.  

"The Rise of Fear-Based Social Media Like Nextdoor, Citizen, and Now Amazon's Neighbors," Rani Molla, May 7, 2019.

"Breaking the Limits in Urban Video Monitoring: Massive Crowd Source Surveillance Over Vehicles," Vitaly PetrovSergey AndreevMario GerlaYevgeni Koucheryavy, IEEE Wireless Communications, September 23, 2018.

Crowdsourced Surveillanced and Networked Data, Nick Lally, Security Dialogue, SAGE, February 2017.

"The Real Monster of Street Level Surveillance," Rory Mir, Electronic Frontier Foundation, October 25, 2024.

PETER ST ONGE: Trump Wants to Abolish the Income Tax But Will Congress Cooperate?

profstonge.com

"Trump Wants to Abolish the Income Tax."

It's official.  Donald Trump wants to abolish the income tax.  In a much anticipated interview with Joe Rogan, Trump said the country should return to the late 19th century when we had no income tax at all and funded the federal government with tariffs.  Now for months, Trump has been making it clear he really does not like the income tax.  He's promised to exempt tax on tips, Social Security, overtime pay, first responders, and even 18 million veterans.  I kept hoping he would come out and just break up with the income tax once and for all, and indeed he did.  So what if we end the income tax, laying off all 93,643 IRS agents?  So you can keep every dollar you earn while Washington will have to run on bake sales.  While the income tax currently costs American people $2.4 trillion dollars a year, Trump proposes to replace it with tariffs of 20% on everybody but China, who gets an extra special 60% tariff.  All together that might bring in about $900 billion dollars a year this would grow America's economy like rocket fuel I run through some numbers on the free sub stack but maybe near term we were talking a 20% increase in the economy so about a $15,000 raise for the typical American family note that's on top of the een thousand of income tax you would no longer have to pay knock off $3,000 for the tariffs and you get about $30,000 in additional income for the typical American family close to $3,000 per month.  Keeps getting better because going by low tax countries today or America before the income tax we might expect a doubling of annual economic growth.  So 5% growth would be the new normal.  Your kids would be three times richer than you as it used to work in America.   America would be by far the richest country in the world, also as it was before the income tax.  Of course, ditching the income tax would also mean the mother of federal budget holds after all replacing 2.4 trillion dollars with $900 billion dollars is a big hole even if you add say an extra $500 billion in payroll and excise tax from economic growth you still got about a trillion dollars to cover now we could just let it run a deficit letting the economy outgrow it I mean that's what they do with everything else that does not grow the economy but you could also cut a trillion dollars in federal spending out of the six and a half to seven trillion that we currently spend.  How would one do such a thing?  Well, the other day, Elon Musk estimated he could cut two trillion dollars in waste and fraudulent payments Ron Paul responded suggesting the military industrial complex and the Pharma industrial complex indeed going by countries like Britain perhaps $800 out of $900 billion dollars we spend on military is not for protecting Americans.  So border, Coast Guard, nukes, it's for invading other countries.  As for Pharma, really the medical industrial complex, if we simply copy countries like Singapore, we might save around about $2 trillion dollars or more and Americans would not go bankrupt getting knee surgery.  And then there is illegals, $150 billion a year minimum, plus the $1 trillion or more we spend on welfare, much of it to the able-bodied.  Sharpen some pencils, and you get $1 trillion easy, probably $2 trillion if you try.  So your country is rich, the IRS is gone, and you get a nice lean government.  

So what's next?  The Uniparty will fight this like a rabid dog.  But if a president can sell it to American voters, $30,000 is a chunk of change, Congress will go along out of sheer self-preservation; plus, the bake sales would be lit.