Thursday, April 25, 2024



In my opinion, Sasha is too kind to Dr. Drew.  The fact that she doesn't appear until the 29-minute mark is odd.  She is the marquee guest.  

DREW, 29:10.  You we're starting a frame saying that doctors don't know anything.

LATYPOVA, 29:20. What I mean by anything we were talking about vaccine science and law and my point was that most of these crimes I treat them as intentional crimes so most of it has to do with understanding the law and understanding the pharmaceutical regulations which unfortunately practicing Physicians do not they are treating patients and they believe what the authorities tell them the health department The Regulators and what Pharma reps tell them.  

After looking into this, and I started with the VAERS data by the way, and I totally agree with Tom that the regulators are lying about the various data.  And they do have those thousand different other databases that are much more accurate, and so they know precisely how many deaths and injuries there are due to the vaccine, and even in court filings they don't deny it.  They just lie to the public when they have to respond to the courts.  They say, "Yes, we know.  It's all legal," and that's correct, because the evidence of the intentional crime are the changes in the US law that have been done going back to even the late 80s, starting in the late 80s, and then more recently the partnership between the HHS and the Department of Defense.  Also, evidence of premeditation of this crime goes back to 2016 and 2017.  I published on my substack a leaked audio of the AstraZeneca CEO and VP responsible for monoclonal antibodies Mark Aster discussing in in late 2020s where they describe the part that the Department of Defense approach them in 2017 to start working on the program where the Department of Defense will identify viruses that will cause pandemics and then the farmer companies will respond with drugs and vaccines made in 60 days . . . 

DREW, 31:40. If we have a bioterrorism event I want the defense to have a relationship with Pharma where they could do that no?

LATYPOVA, 31:54. It's not possible to develop anything within 60 days that's fiction and that's exactly how experienced drug developer Mark Kessler responded initially to this he said I thought it was science fiction and that's the correct reaction.  Because it is science fiction it's a narrative it's a fake story that these guys at the Department of Defense manufactured because they want to develop biological weapons but they can't because by a weapons convention prohibits them from doing that so this is the story that they sold to everyone including Congress and pharmaceutical companies and pharmaceutical companies were quickly were convinced to throw away their skepticism because there was money involved for no particular deliverables and since 2017 they have assembled a Consortium the Department of Defense assembled a Consortium of over 300 companies including Pharma companies academic institutions and all kinds of other organizations where they were keeping this base of people who agreed to do this from which they selected ultimately 6 or 10 companies that participated in operation warp speed got billions of dollars, and the deliverable were emergency use countermeasures, prototypes, and demonstrations purchased through other transaction Authority which is a very secretive mechanism to buy prototypes without disclosing anything to the Congress to the people where the money is going of course these contracts were no bid awarded to friends and cronies of Dr. Robert Kadlec, Former Assistant HHS Secretary.  See what Katherine Watt said about Kadlec on January 9, 2023
In my view, Alex AzarRobert Kadlec and Marion Gruber should be the first American war criminals prosecuted for the American implementation of the Covid-19 mass terror and mass murder campaign. There will be hundreds of defendants eventually; I posted a starter list in August 2022 and update it as I find more criminals in the records. 

And by law, emergency use countermeasures under Public Health Emergency are not pharmaceutical products are not treated as Pharmaceuticals.  They do not have any consumer protections as you would expect from them it's a legal and possibility to conduct a clinical trial using emergency use countermeasures because you legally cannot provide informed consent and IRB does not apply so that's why I'm saying you know when Physicians are told that this is a vaccine it's safe and effective and you read all the law that applies and doesn't apply to emergency countermeasures it becomes very clear that this is a premeditated very carefully plan long-term executed strategy to deceive everyone into taking these poisons.  And also to address what Tom friends just said I am very sorry that his wife is sick with cancer it's a tragedy I just had a guest in my house who is 18 your old daughter was injected with Pfizer and she has cancer I sat across numerous people who lost their children to these injections some died immediately some deaths were gruesome and these people have to go and testify to lawmakers and anybody who would listen and recount the story over and over and over again and this is a massive massive crime and it needs to stop now the FDA was fully aware that these things would cause cancer because they've written numerous guidance documents that's how they regulate industry so even in 2015 and I've read those guidance documents in 2015 2013 even more recently than that they wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to the manufacturers who wanted to develop mRNA products

 

CONGRESS IS COMMITTING TREASON BY FUNDING THE INVASION OF THE U.S.

Then just weeks later the Bush Administration asked the Federal Claims court to seal the documents of those cases. Do you know who used to sit on Eli Lilly's board of directors? Former President George Bush Sr.

Did you know in the final hours of negotiations for the Homeland Security Act of 2002, a mysterious Rider was introduced to the bill that would have exonerated Eli Lilly from any liability for its product Thimerosal?

It just so happened that they were being sued by families of autistic children at the time who claimed it was the cause of their plight. Then just weeks later the Bush Administration asked the Federal Claims court to seal the documents of those cases. Do you know who used to sit on Eli Lilly's board of directors? Former President George Bush Sr. In this video author of the book "Evidence of Harm", David Kirby explains how he came to the belief that Thimerosal is indeed a contributing factor in the autism epidemic. It was taken out of the childhood schedule but is still very much in use in the Flu shots to this day, so if you inject your children with flu shots, be aware of the potential risks.

5:04. How did you become interested in this, are you in the medical profession?  

5:07. No, I'm a journalist, but I do have some public health background.  I worked in AIDS research.  I worked for the city of New York on public health issues.  I've consulted for the National Cancer Institute but I approach this as a journalist, actually as somebody interested in politics, and in November 2002 when they passed the  Homeland Security Bill there was a rider that was slipped in at the last minute, a secret rider, to dismiss all the lawsuits against Eli Lilly which invented Thimerosal, the mercury-containing vaccines, ah, mercury-containing preservative put in these vaccines, and I thought that was very suspicious I thought people who have nothing to hide don't act in that manner a week later the Bush Administration sent lawyers into the Federal vaccine Court filed a motion that would seal all the records including access to that database permanently and forever and anybody who had received any information would be forced to relinquish those documents and they would be destroyed it was so Draconian and coming on the heels of the Homeland Security bill, the journalist in me said, I think there's a story here.  And then it expanded from there I found the families who who are pushing this Theory and believe in it and their stories are incredibly compelling that's why this is going to be turned into a movie sort of Allah Aaron Brockovich a feature film Hollywood movie it's been

The Feminine Mind is nature’s universal Animal Mind

The Feminine Mind is nature’s universal Animal Mind: The hyper consumptive and amoral force of nature that works for purposes of survival (and therefore reproductive advantage) but handicaps advanced civilization. The brutal Animal Mind steals, lies, cheats, rapes, and tortures without mercy: The mind of the underclass. Whether it’s a dog stealing food off your table or male elks fighting for the right to rape a female, the Animal Mind from the point of view of Justice (which is not found in the Wilderness) is an Evil force. Until the recent era women were thought to be emissaries of evil and the left has reeducated you on that. So many fools on the right think like they see a “balance” of masculine to feminine that is good, but the good comes from masculine control of the feminine, not from allowing evil to vote and run free in civilization. Look at @curtdoolittle's comparison chart and tell me that feminine qualities are not basically animal behaviors, evil behaviors, or underclass behaviors. The hypercapitalizing Masculine Mind evolved out of the general Animal/Feminine Mind because it produced reproductive advantage for HIS offspring. 

To save America, UFC fighter Renato Moicano begs people to read Ludwign von Mises "Six Lessons," a series of lectures delivered in 1958 to Argentina to turn from dictatorship

Find Mises' 6 Lessons here

Lesson 1: Capitalism.

Lesson 2: Socialism.

Lesson 3: Interventionism. 

Lesson 4: Inflation.

Lesson 5: Foreign Investment.

Lesson 6: Politics and Ideas.

Economic Policy (Large Print Edition): Thoughts for Today and Tomorrow, Ludwig von Mises, 

Amazon reads

These chapters were originally delivered as lectures in Argentina in 1958, at the University of Buenos Aires, and later written up in prose. Mises had urged Argentina to turn from dictatorship and socialism toward full liberty, so there is a special urgency behind the cool logic employed here. The book's continued popularity is due to its clarity of exposition on the ways in which economic policy affects everyone.

It is a very good text for undergraduates studying economic policy, and for anyone who wants to gain a fundamental understanding of the interaction between market forces and government intervention.