MEDIA LITERACY CLASSES IN SCHOOLS: Not about Literacy. About CENSORSHIP

They are training a generation of censorship professionals tied to the teat of government-backed censorship operations. 

The “Media Literacy” scam is accelerating way too fast & it has to be stopped NOW.

Here’s why: pic.twitter.com/GCr7Q54adF

— Mike Benz (@MikeBenzCyber) November 21, 2023

00:58   What is Media Literacy?

When you hear the words media literacy, you fixate on the word literacy, and you think they're talking about underserved, underprivileged, inner-city schools with kids who can't read because we have an epidemic of illiteracy and low literacy rates among a lot of our youth.  So you hear that word literacy and you think that's what they're talking about.  That is not what it is at all.  Media Literacy says if you don't read the right media sources, official media sources, official state-backed media, government sources, or regime-compliant media, then you are illiterate.  You are media illiterate, and you need to get your mind right to read the right media sources.  So media literacy is just regime media installation.  And it is about the institutional embedding of censorship organs within K-12 schools, within higher ed.  And then at the capacity building side by tons and tons of government money propping this up.  

2:04. Now, a couple of levels of this.  Media literacy is literally about training you to be stupid, to be dumb.  The underlying presupposition of the field, the illegitimate field of media literacy, is that if you do critical thinking you will become a heretic, you will become a wrong thinker, a dissident, a heterodox person.  If you think critically, if you go down the rabbit hole, if you do your own independent research, you will not trust the regime, you will not trust the system, you will not trust government narratives; you will not trust legacy, mainstream media.  And so they teach methods . . . the curriculum for media literacy programs are about how not to do your own research.  I'm not joking.  You can look all this up for example the SIFT Method [it's an evaluation strategy] is one of the core things that have been developed. It just says that when you have a research topic and you want to look something up for school and you want to look something up on your own private time, don't go down the rabbit hole, don't think independently, sift through the top 10 results of a Google search, Wikipedia, and Wikipedia-approved sources.  Mind you, Wikipedia currently lists Elon Musk as a far-right conspiracy theorist and bans the ability to even have the most conservative or Centrist outlooks allowed to even be cited.  So it pre-bans the ability to even access news institutions that might challenge government narratives.  This is Clockwork Orange on steroids, and it's being mandated by governments.  This is the part that I was not expecting to happen so fast.  The state of California just last week passed a mandatory media literacy law requiring every public K-12 school in the entire state to have mandatory media literacy classes.  Now every single actor in the censorship industry is doing touchdown dances, spinning the basketball a la Wilt Chamberlain or Harlem Globetrotters style, just stuffing on the rest of the world that's had its eyes closed because this is millions and millions of dollars that automatically flow into the censorship's pockets because it is mandatory government required capacity building to do this.  There are going to be 10,000 people at least just in the schools in the California system we're going to need to be these teachers in all these classes K through 12 you're going to need to train an army of educators on how not to trust alternative news or Elon musk's vision at X or social media influencers who disagree about health or electoral politics or on environmental issues or on abortion immigration or energy or any of that.  Again it's not just the curriculum that's only a tiny part of it it's the Civil Society capacity building they're funding this is mandatory government money to a censorship mercenary Army in charge of your kids that just passed in California it already passed in Illinois it's already in Rhode Island it's now in New York this industry could not support itself and while there is Success right now at the federal level with things that have been done around these major class action lawsuits, Missouri V Biden, America First lawsuit, Congressional investigations and subpoenas.  They are going down into the state governments one by one capacity-building the industry to destroy the alternative news industry.  And this has got to be challenged before it gets its roots down because they are going to make the argument that if we don't stop it now they are going to make the argument that "you're going to have hundreds of thousands of public employees who are going to be put out of a job if you kill immediate literacy later," which is to say that they're going to make the same argument that coal miners in West Virginia would make, "Well, if you shut down the mine, you're going to put all these people out of a job."  They are training a generation of censorship professionals tied to the teat of government-backed censorship operations.  Their careers are going to be attached to this.  "They won't be able to provide for their families if you take away their censorship jobs." That's literally going to be the world that we're going to be in, if this thing isn't killed now.  

Every time you hear the word media literacy, drop this link to them

Biden DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas: "I fully support, and have for many years, amnesty for illegal immigrants"

It doesn't hurt to listen to the following exchange from a particular context.  Hear what the Russian conservative, Vladimir Putin has to say about the west's inability to replace its own population and how free immigration on the American taxpayer's dime is no substitute.  It means we are surrendering the values that made this country great over the last 250 years.  

.@RepChipRoy Full Questioning Of DHS Secretary Mayorkas @chiproytx Exposes Mayorkas For Lying About "Operational Control" Of The Border

"Your agency is releasing people on purpose in order to flood the zone & make sure that more people can come to the United States." pic.twitter.com/kdLIxChYKD

— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) April 28, 2022

Biden DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas: "I fully support, and have for many years, amnesty for illegal immigrants" pic.twitter.com/PeFJBnui3G

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) April 28, 2022

Virginia Bill To Allow Illegal Immigrants To Become Police Officers & Arrest American Citizens

Virginia Bill To Allow Illegal Immigrants To Become Police Officers & Arrest American Citizens

This bill allows “illegal aliens granted DACA to become police officers”

The Black Vote knows it won’t stop there:

“I want to know who was responsible for this piece of trash… pic.twitter.com/kTJRr7nkgD

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) March 26, 2024

Virginia Bill To Allow Illegal Immigrants To Become Police Officers & Arrest American Citizens

This bill allows “illegal aliens granted DACA to become police officers” The Black Vote knows it won’t stop there: “I want to know who was responsible for this piece of trash legislation that was gonna tell the migrants at the border, get ready to arrest Americans in the country legally.” “It passed the house. It passed the senate. It made it on to the governor's desk. What the **** is going on here? You couldn't tell us. You couldn't get the word out. So I guess we was going to just have a legal just show up in police uniform, and Americans was just supposed to take it. We are supposed to comply?” More about the bill from FEDERATION FOR AMERICAN IMMIGRATION REFORM: “While Senator McPike and Chief Newsham appear sympathetic to DACA recipients, they seem perfectly comfortable creating a situation in which illegal aliens can enforce U.S. law—and in doing so, can arrest and take into custody U.S. citizens and legal permanent residents. Furthermore, neither has fully explained how DACA beneficiaries can serve as police officers when federal law generally bars illegal aliens from possessing firearms. Representative John Macco (R-Ledgeview) wrote in support of his bill saying, “Simply, it is common-sense legislation that would allow local law enforcement agencies to hire diverse and qualified candidates. Ironically, the legislators pushing these bills talk about how these illegal aliens are “qualified” to become law enforcement officers. But, as mentioned above, illegal aliens are generally barred from possessing firearms. Moreover, to carry out their duties, officers must take an oath of office, which requires them to enforce the law and protect the constitutional rights of all in their community. DACA recipients cannot, in good faith, take this oath because they continuously reside in the United States in violation of the law. And, even if the illegal aliens who benefited from DACA were otherwise law-abiding, their illegal status could impede their efforts to enforce the law. State legislators pushing proposals to allow illegal aliens to become police officers are not only undermining the rule of law but also threatening public safety. The public must be confident that the officers sworn to protect them and uphold the law are upstanding citizens in the community. FAIR is working with state legislators to make sure these bills do not advance and to protect the integrity of law enforcement agencies across the country as we deal with the worst border crisis in history”

IMMIGRATION CRISIS: Major Cause is that they're fleeing from low civilian gun ownership to a high civilian gun ownership state

from Ostrowski:

Immigrants come from low-gun-ownership countries to the US, a high-gun-ownership country.  

They come here to escape mindless gang violence and random political violence.  They come here to become citizens.  They come here, my right-wing people would say, because of all the free stuff.  I think that's very incomplete.  Yeah, we have a relatively generous welfare state, and once you get in the borders, . . . it's understood that the current regime isn't going to kick anybody out.  You get here physically and you're in, you have a kid, your kid has birthright citizenship--that's one of the 4 reasons why people come here.  To become citizens themselves, to get welfare, birthright citizenship for the kids, and . . . ?

The reason we have the leading economy on earth is due to private gun ownership.  It's a check on government power.  There's a general correlation between a well-armed civilian population and relatively high rates of freedom.  Until the last few years, there's been some decline.  The U.S. is at the top in terms of freedom.  The other country is Switzerland.  People want to invest in a stable polity.  the U.S. is a stable polity because of civilian gun ownership.  In his The 2nd Amendment Works, he points out that countries have coup d etats when civilians don't have any guns.  You take a couple of hundred people in some of these 3rd world countries and you take over a couple of key positions in the capital and you control the country.  This happened in Burma, Myanmar.  The War on Drugs creates refugees.  Gang violence in Nicaragua.  That violence is drug violence.  End the Global War on Drugs tomorrow and that will create more political stability in these countries and people will want to stay in their own country if they want to.  And have a Global Right to bear arms.  People fleeing hellhole countries for the United States, they're fleeing from low gun ownership countries.  When you have a low gun ownership country, you have political instability.  Coup d'états correlate with low civilian gun ownership.  We don't shoot politicians because they raise taxes 14%.  The mere possession of the right to bear arms is a peaceful deterrent to tyranny.  In other words, we don't have to go out and shoot anybody, the government just knows, like our government knows.  That's why they spy on gun people and infiltrate organizations.  They know even though some of the naive people do not.  If the U.S. government started a civil war against this population, we would win in about a month.  We would kick their fucking ass.  Now, we don't have to do it.  It's latent.  It's peaceful.  That's why I have the double D olive branch in my book.  

My observations:

I really liked Ostrowski's point, an obvious one, but as Gary North used to say, "Facts don't speak for themselves," so I was glad to hear it stated, "The reason we have the leading economy on earth is due to private gun ownership.  It's a check on government power."  You do realize that every time you heard Obama and his progressive ilk say, "Who needs an AR for deer hunting?" he's literally baying for your surrender or death.  He's downgrading your survival and self-defense to hunting for venison.  Don't believe me?  Compare his remarks and his principles with Lenin.  Gun control is the root of terror.  Civilian gun ownership is the root of peace.  See Ostrowski's "Intellectual Roots of Terror."

 

Opting Out Of The Obamacare Tax: What Happens If You Don't Pay?

Kelly Phillips, Erb

Last month, the Obama administration announced that between three and six million households – about 2 to 4 % of taxpayers – would be faced with a penalty (or is it a tax?) at tax time for failing to secure “minimum essential coverage” to comply with the Affordable Care Act (ACA), sometimes referred to as Obamacare.

Under Obamacare, you’re considered covered if you have insurance through the government, including Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, retiree coverage, TRICARE, or VA health coverage; private insurance that you purchased on your own including COBRA coverage and coverage obtained through the Health Insurance Marketplace; or provided by your employer (even if you didn’t pay anything for the coverage). You’ll report coverage on your tax return (find out how here). Most taxpayers – about 130 million or so – will report coverage.

Of those that don’t have coverage (estimates range from 20 million to 37.5 million), most will avoid being subject to the penalty based on a waiver or exemption. Exemptions exist based on income or filing status, immigration status and religious affiliation – as well as the much-talked about incarceration exemption. A number of hardship exemptions are also available. (For more on exemptions and waivers, click here.)

Those taxpayers who can’t demonstrate essential minimum coverage and aren’t otherwise exempt are subject to a penalty – the shared individual responsibility payment – equal to 1% of income above the “filing threshold” or $95 per adult and $47.50 per child (up to $285 for a family), whichever is higher. That amount is figured and reported on the taxpayer’s 2014 tax return, payable by April 15, 2015.

For the 2015 tax year, the amount of the penalty increases to 2% of income or $325 per adult; in 2016, it jumps up again to 2.5% of income or $695 per person.

In terms of dollars, the CBO had initially estimated that by 2016, nearly six million taxpayers would be subject to an average penalty of $1,200. The overwhelmingly majority (80%) of those estimated to be at risk to the penalty were those in the middle class with incomes between $55,850 and $115,250.

Since that time, the numbers have been adjusted downward, based largely on the perceived success of policies purchased through the Marketplace and the increased number of taxpayers exempt under the rules. Those estimates – between three and six million households – are still just guesses. But the dollars associated with those numbers are the real mystery. You see, buried in the language of the 2010 law creating the Affordable Health Care Act (you remember, the “big f*cking deal”) is a bit of an out: There are practically no real consequences for not paying the penalty.

I mentioned this to Maggie McGrath, personal finance reporter for Forbes, while shooting video about the Health Care Act earlier this month. “Shouldn’t that be the real story?” she asked.

She’s right, of course. It should but oddly enough, nobody is really talking about it.

Why so quiet? Here’s my guess: nobody has a clue what’s really going to happen. You see, when the Act became news in 2010, rumors were flying about what would happen if you didn’t pay the penalty. It was politically tricky. The consequences needed to be enough to make you want to conform with the Act but not so onerous that Congress would be loathe to vote for it.

The final language in the Act declared that the penalty “shall be paid upon notice and demand” which sounds really intimidating. The language went on to note that the penalty would be “collected in the same manner as an assessable penalty under subchapter B of chapter 68″ which also sounds pretty serious – especially since subchapter B references some pretty nasty penalties for otherwise not complying with other sections of the Tax Code.

So what would the penalty for noncompliance be? Jail time? Nope. The language in the Act specifically rules out jail time, saying at Section 500A(g)(2)(A):

In the case of any failure by a taxpayer to timely pay any penalty imposed by this section, such taxpayer shall not be subject to any criminal prosecution or penalty with respect to such failure.

So, no jail time.

But that means that the IRS will chase you and lien your property if you don’t pay, right?

Nope. That’s not allowed under the Act.

At 500A(g)(2)(B)(i), the Treasury cannot “file notice of lien with respect to any property of a taxpayer by reason of any failure to pay the penalty imposed by this section.”

So, no liens.

Then, clearly there will be levies or seizures on your wages and account, right?

Nope. Not that either. Under 500A(g)(2)(B)(ii), the Treasury cannot “levy on any such property with respect to such failure.”

To recap then, by law, you have to pay the penalty. But if you don’t, you won’t go to jail, you won’t be liened and you won’t be levied for collection.

Is there anything that could happen to you if you choose not to pay? With no jail, no liens and no levies, it doesn’t leave the IRS a lot of room to work when it comes to collections. Congress actually managed to create, as I wrote in 2012 and in in 2013, an incredibly complex and burdensome law without any teeth.

Well, maybe some teeth. Baby teeth. The IRS might seize any part or all of your refund in order to satisfy your obligation. Might. IRS hasn’t come right out and said that it absolutely will offset your refund if you owe a penalty for failure to pay. However, in the Final Regulations issued on this matter, IRS noted that “[n]othing in this section prohibits the Secretary from offsetting any liability for the shared responsibility payment against any overpayment due the taxpayer, in accordance with section 6402(a) and its corresponding regulations.” That’s sufficiently passive aggressive, right? You’re on notice that the IRS doesn’t think that it’s barred from taking your refund. They’re not saying they will (for certain) but they’re not saying they won’t either.

So is there anything you can expect for sure? You can definitely expect a lot of letter writing and virtual shaking of the government’s fist at you. Maybe even some blustering, for good measure.

But real consequences? Other than that potential refund seizure and a guilty conscience, there’s nothing to keep taxpayers from opting out of paying. Will they? We’ll have to wait and see.

Want more taxgirl goodness? Pick your poison: follow me on twitter, hang out onFacebook and Google, play on Pinterest or check out my YouTube channel. For cases and tax related docs, visit Scribd.

U.S. IMMIGRATION POLICY: Whatever city you want and you don't have the money, the Department of Homeland Security will pay for your plane ticket

Please tell us how the people from Nepal are getting here to the United States and who is enticing them to come.

It took me 3 days down there to really understand what's happening at the border I didn't really understand the full impact of how crazy it is many of them have been terribly abused there's a tree called the rape tree where the cartels extract the final payment from women before they come across and what happens to children when they come across and the disappearances the people are are extorted they're exploited they're robbed they are beating their raped so that's part of the issue the other part is that they come across and they're not released on their own recognizance they are brought through the border patrol and the border patrol processes them they fingerprint them so if they have a criminal record they're diverted to a holding facility if you don't have a criminal record you are asked what city do you want to go to? And many of them don't have any money.  Whatever city you want and you don't have the money, the Department of Homeland Security will pay for your plane ticket.  Read that again.  The Department of Homeland Security is paying for illegal immigrants to stay at any city of their choosing paid for by U.S. taxpayer.  You're brought to the airport on buses and you board the plane to whatever destination you want in the country they're Landing in New York and Minneapolis creating big burdens on the social services systems in those cities.  The way it's happening and there's the worst part of the border patrol is utterly tomorrow lives then you know they

Wow!  "We're not defending the border anymore.  We're just processing people coming in."  9 of them have committed suicide in the last couple of years because they're utterly demoralized.  The cartels are now running everything at the border, so the cartels have tick tots that you can look up and YouTube videos to show what you need to do to get into the United States to the cartels you fly from countries all over the world of all the families that we saw coming across about 300 only two were from Latin America.  I thought all these people were going to be from El Salvador, Nicaragua, or Panama, or Costa Rica and Mexico, but no.  They're all from countries countries like Azerbaijan Kazakhstan Uzbekistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan . . . a lot of them from China, Nepal, and Tibet, and then every country in West Africa.  The reason is that cartels are advertising across the globe.  You get on an airplane to Mexico City, and you get your visa in Mexico City.  And the cartel will help you do it, so a domestic Visa in Mexico.  And then you fly to Mexicali.  They have a parking lot that's filled with these big white buses.  Each bus carries 55 people and 

10 points of a populist strategy for libertarian change, by Hans-Hermann Hoppe (2017)

10 puntos de una estrategia libertaria | Hans-Hermann Hoppe pic.twitter.com/M14nnaxtAC

— Menos Estado (@m_estado) December 23, 2023

1.  STOP MASS IMMIGRATION. 

2.  STOP ATTACKING AND KILLING PEOPLE IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES. 

3.  DEFUND THE RULING ELITES' INTELLECTUAL BODYGUARDS.  Expose and widely publicize the lavish salaries, perks, pensions, side deals, bribes, and hush monies received by the ruling elites, by the higher-ups in governments and governmental bureaucracies of the Supreme Courts, Central Banks, secret services, and spy agencies by politicians, parliamentarians, party leaders, political advisors, and consultants by crony capitalism, public educrats, university presidents, provosts, and academic stars.  Drive home the point that all of their shining glory and luxury is funded by money extorted from taxpayers and consequently urge that any and all taxes be slashed--income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, inheritance taxes, and on and on.

4.  END THE FED AND ALL CENTRAL BANKS. The second source of funding for the ruling elites besides the money extorted from the public in the form of taxes comes from the central banks. 

5.  ABOLISH ALL AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND NON-DISCRIMINATION LAWS AND REGULATIONS.  All such edicts are blatant violations of the principle of "Equality before the law" that at least in the West is intuitively sensed and recognized as a fundamental principle of justice.  As private property owners, people must be free to associate or disassociate with others to include or to exclude, to integrate, or to segregate, to join or to separate, to unify and incorporate or to disunite, exit, and secede.   

6.  CRUSH THE ANTI-FASCIST MOB.  The transvaluation of all values throughout the West, the invention of evermore victimhood, the spread of affirmative action programs, and the relentless promotion of political correctness have led to the rise of an anti-fascist mob.  Tacitly supported and indirectly funded by the ruling elites, this self-described mob of Social Justice Warriors has taken upon itself the task of escalating the fight against white privilege through deliberate acts of terror directed against anyone and anything deemed racist, right-wing, fascist, reactionary, incorrigible, or unreconstructed.

7.  CRUSH THE STREET CRIMINALS AND GANGS.  In dispensing with the principle of equality before the law, and awarding all sorts of group privileges, except to the one group that I mentioned, the ruling elites have also dispensed with the principle of equal punishment for equal crime.  Some state-favored groups are handed more lenient punishment for the same crime than others.  And some especially favored groups are simply let run wild and go practically unpunished at all.  Thus actually and effectively promoting crime.  As well, no-go areas have been permitted to develop where any effort at law enforcement has essentially ceased to exist and where violent thugs and street gangs have taken over.  Given this, public furor must be provoked and it be unmistakenly demanded that the police crackdown quick and hard on any robber, mugger, rapist, and murderer and ruthlessly all no-go areas of violent gang rule.  

8.  GET RID OF ALL WELFARE PARASITES AND BUMS.  To cement their own position, the ruling class has put the underclass on the dole and thus made it the most reliable source of public support, allegedly to help people rise and move up from the underclass to become self-supporting actors, the real and actually intended effect of the state's social policy is the exact opposite.  It has rendered a person's underclass status more permanent and made the underclass permanently grow.  

9.  GET THE STATE OUT OF EDUCATION.  Most, if not all, social pathologies plaguing the contemporary West have their common root in the institute of public education.  When the first steps were taken, well more than 200 years ago in Prussia to supplement and ultimately replace a formerly completely private system of education with a universal system of compulsory public education, the time spent in state-run schools did, in most cases, not exceed 4 years.  Today, throughout the entire Western world, the time spent in institutions of public education is at a minimum of 10 years, and in many cases, 20, or even 30 years.  That is a large, or even the largest, part of time during the most formative period in a person's life is spent in state-funded and state-supervised institutions, whose primary purpose from the very beginning was not to raise an enlightened public but to train good soldiers, and later on, good public servants.  

10.  DON'T PUT YOUR TRUST IN POLITICS AND POLITICAL PARTIES.  Just as Academia and the academic world cannot be expected to play any significant role in a libertarian strategy for social change, so with politics and political parties.  After all, it is the ultimate goal of libertarianism to put an end to all politics, and to subject all personal relations and conflicts to private law and civil law procedures.  All pervasively politicized conditions and involvement in politics Party politics cannot be entirely avoided however any such involvement one must be keenly aware of and guard against the corrupting influence of power in The Lure of money and perks that come with it and to minimize the risk and Temptation that comes from this it is advisable to concentrate one's effort on the level of regional and local rather than National politics and they are to promote a radical agenda of decentralization of nullification and peaceful separation segregation secession most importantly however we must take heed of Ludwig von Mises's life motto, "Do not give in to evil but proceed ever more boldly against it," that is we must speak out whenever and whatever, whether formal or informal gathering against anyone affronting us with the, by now all too familiar, politically correct drivel and left egalitarianism involved in this and unmistakably say, "No, hell no.  You must be kidding!" and in the meantime given the almost mind-control exercise by the ruling elite academia and the mainstream media, it already requires a good portion of courage to do that but if we are not brave enough to do so now and thus set an example for others to follow _________? will become increasingly worse and more dangerous in the future and we, in Western Civilization and the Western ideas of freedom and liberty, will be wiped out and vanish.

The Myth of National Defense: Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production https://t.co/OSYB7TWbLj via @amazon

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) December 31, 2023

TUCKER ON WHY DC HATES TRUMP

00:35  His arrest has been inevitable since February 16, 2016.  That's the day that Donald Trump made a blood enemy of the largest, most-powerful organization in human history, which would be the Federal government.  Despite what you may remember, it wasn't anything that Trump had said about immigration or trading with China or rapists from Mexico.  Those were the stories that dominated the headlines that year.  "Trump's a racist!" they screamed, "Stop him!"  But inside Washington that was just noise.  None of it really rated.  Identity politics doesn't really matter to permanent Washington.  What matters then and now is foreign policy--the invasions and occupations and proxy wars, the decisions that determine which global populations will thrive and which will die, the policies that come with trillion-dollar price tags, the ones that over time have made the counties around DC the richest in the world. 01:29 

Powerless. COVID was just the beginning. If they can take down Trump, they can take us all down. Meanwhile our governor @GregAbbott_TX is passing legislation to protect textured hair. https://t.co/zDOAc7OI6o

— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) June 13, 2023

Do the homeless camps in California take your eye off the immigration problem and its million-dollars costs to U.S. taxpayer?

Thanks to Martin Armstrong @ Armstrong Economics.

COMMENT: Getting a lot of stuff about migrants (pictures attached). Afghanis and Uzbeks are seen and the Uzbeks speak English after a fashion. By the way, why is the Panamanian Red Cross putting out their message in English?? Afghani speaks no English and is making this trip with a young daughter?? (Says he is from Kabul). Note also the last bullet point on the Red Cross literature about migratory routes!!

 

 

More to the point is that a LOT are sick when they come into the US. Of the people filming this material, five out of six got sick when they went to Panama and the Darien Gap point.  The Uzbek (speaking some English) said he flew from Central Asia to Turkey to Mexico City to Tijuana (and then back to Panama??). He is 18 years old. Who paid for all of this?? He also said that his father lives in NY City. So he can’t use normal immigration family reunification methods but goes through Hell like he has??

Tuberculosis is a biggie here and yet these people stream North and are admitted into the US and then bussed/flown to every podunk town you can think of. Forget new pandemics made in a lab – just look at what is being brought into the US by people supposedly illegal!

-Gerry  

MARTIN ARMSTRONG'S REPLY: A lot of emails are coming in that the US is staging people to enter the country. The Biden Administration has opened the borders in hopes of securing a second term. Title 42 prevents illegals from entering the country under the premise of COVID. That was before the Ukraine war when the fixation was COVID and the spread of germs. COVID never went away, nor did other ailments, but they need the beehive mind to focus on Ukraine and defeating “Russian aggression.”

Tuberculosis (TB), as you mentioned, is also airborne and highly contagious. Those who do not receive treatment will die and it is currently one of the top 10 causes of death in the world. The World Health Organization even admits that refugees are prone to diseases. “They undertake long, exhausting journeys with inadequate access to food and water, sanitation and other basic services, which increases their risk of communicable diseases, particularly measles, and food- and waterborne diseases,” the WHO states. The WHO blames the lack of health care on xenophobia, but those who enter legally are in fact tested. US taxpayers pay millions per year to treat migrants, but states such as Florida are now requiring hospital patients to show proof of citizenship.

As for the Red Cross and Red Crescent, they fund the illegal voyages of migrants. They are partners with the UN Refugee Agency, which boasts of resettling 57,500 refugees worldwide in 2021. “Whether on the ground or at sea, our teams deliver help to anyone in need—regardless of race, religion, sexual orientation, or citizenship status,” the American Red Cross states on its website.

The American Red Cross also directly assists people at the US-Mexico border:  Meaning these organizations have made the US-Mexico border a safe haven where care and supplies are almost guaranteed. They are incentivizing people to come into America illegally. And what is the penalty? It is unlikely that they will be deported or even detected upon arrival. The situation is far worse than Biden turning a blind eye to the border crisis. There is a deliberate global effort to keep America’s borders open which threatens public health, elections, and national security.

Basic Aid at the U.S.–Mexico Border and in U.S. Cities 

The American Red Cross may provide support as needed to people being bussed by other organizations from the U.S.-Mexico border to U.S. cities. This includes supporting these lead organizations with services for people in their care by providing relief supplies or training. And, depending on local needs, our assistance might also include providing food, water, comfort, health services and mental health support. We aim to prevent and mitigate additional humanitarian consequences that migration can bring — including the potential for separation and loss of contact with family, disappearances, detention and medical issues.

The American Red Cross may also provide relief supplies — such as cots, blankets, hygiene items, first aid kits and towels — for use by local nonprofits caring for people. In some cases, the Red Cross has provided phones to local organizations, which people can use to reconnect with family members back home to let them know they’re safe.

Meaning these organizations have made the US-Mexico border a safe haven where care and supplies are almost guaranteed. They are incentivizing people to come into America illegally. And what is the penalty? It is unlikely that they will be deported or even detected upon arrival. The situation is far worse than Biden turning a blind eye to the border crisis. There is a deliberate global effort to keep America’s borders open which threatens public health, elections, and national security.

The world's biggest contiguous Prime Farmland overlays our Mississippi River system. The USA can deliver more food cheaply to markets than any other.

There's a reason our globalist foes push sneaky schemes to divide and undermine the US (national divorce, North American Union, multipolarism, mass immigration, etc.).

Our unique natural advantages make us unbeatable—but only if we stick together.  https://t.co/aKXHL0xJi3

— Richard Poe 🇺🇸 (@RealRichardPoe) October 1, 2023

"The carrot that Schwab is handing out [to the different governors, prime ministers, and leaders] is the end to democracy. So they no longer have to be accountable to anybody . . . "

Thanks to Martin Armstrong.

4:00  COVID crisis really began with the Repo Crisis which began in 2019.  US banks were suddenly not willing to lend to anybody in Europe, so the Federal Reserve had to step in.  And just recently, I spoke to the top 3 major U.S. banks in New York, and they will not accept any European bond whatsoever for collateral.  It's interesting to see the capital flows, and there are people who do know what's going to happen in advance and they begin to move their money; that's what our computer picks up.

5:12  He was put into prison under civil contempt, which you're not entitled to a trial.  The statute says 18 months; they kept me for 7 years.  I was finally released only after my case got to the Supreme Court.  The Supreme Court ordered them to explain why I was in prison, and then they finally had to release me and said the case was moot.  That's basically the way it goes.  HSBC paid a criminal restitution of $606 million dollars.

8:30  The crisis really began when the ECB put the interest rates into negative territory; they did that in 2014.  He warned them.  Do not do this.  You're not going to get out of it.  They basically didn't listen.  I think I'm at least partly responsible for why the Federal Reserve did not go that far.  Once they went negative, nobody was going to buy their bonds.  They were forced by law to buy the pension funds, and now all of the pension funds in Europe are insoluble.  Now they have a major financial crisis.  

9:30  Governments want to default on their debt.  They can't do that because all the pension funds will be wiped out.  Depending on the country, anywhere between 70% and 100% has to be invested in government bonds.  So if you have governments default, you're going to have pension funds wiped out, then you're going to have millions of people storming their palaces with pitchforks.  You'll no longer have mortgages, student loans, car loans, etc.  

10:35  The problem that he has is that he is a die-hard Marxist for years.  The idea of Marxism worked with the Russian Revolution only because serfdom continues in Russia and it wasn't abolished until 1861, whereas serfdom ended in the 15th century in Europe.  When that ended, the people didn't own anything.  All the property, all the wealth was in the hands of the aristocrats absolutely.  They had nothing.  So Marx's idea that let's have a revolution, go get their stuff, at least made sense, in the sense that these people didn't own anything at all to begin with.  But trying to do that today is quite different: people own their own houses, their cars, they have a career, we're not starting from absolute zero, which is what made Marxism work to some degree, you know, to at least get it off the ground.  But Schwab still talks of equality and things of this nature, but that's really kind of nuts because that very idea is what brought communism down.  

12:12  How is he being so successful in convincing so many people that this is such a great idea?  Why does he have this power?  

12:21  He is a very strategic, very cunning type person.  [Aren't there other leaders with these qualities who are pro-freedom, pro-capitalism?]  He's not a frontman as some of these people think that he's just a frontman for Soros or DAVOS.  No, he has been the brainchild behind a lot of this and they have been attracted to him.  [Recall that Schwab was an acolyte of Kissinger.]  He knows how to manipulate things.  He's created this program Young Leaders for Tomorrow.  He's taking people and basically indoctrinating them to his philosophies and then puts them in various offices.  The head of the EU was on his board.  The head of the IMF was on his board.  The head of the ECB is on his board.  Tedros from the WHO, he put him in there.  The head of the United Nations was associated with the World Economic Forum.  He knows exactly what he's doing.  He's buying his way through government.  So it's more or less indoctrinating them, and the politicians really did get scared when Trump was elected.  In Washington, DC, they thought it was a fluke.  No, they voted against you.  You don't understand that.  He beat 17 career politicians.  It's not that he was the greatest white knight coming to save the world or something.  It was that the voters didn't like them [i.e., the politicians] and they didn't want to hear that.  So they would rather say it was a fluke.  And the AFT, that did a piece in 2016 when Trump was elected, and suddenly that's when democracy became populism.  Populism was bad; they just switched the words.  The main reason they were so against Trump was because they were afraid that would happen to them, that the career politicians would be simply voted out.  If you look at Schwab's 8 Points, besides his "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy about it," he says that the U.S. will no longer be a superpower; that will be shared by the United Nations.  He has a whole bunch of things in there, in the 8 Points, that are very critical.  And one of them is that democracy will no longer exist.  They view that the people voted for Trump and are just too stupid and that we know better.    

15:30  They view that the people voted for Trump and that they [Klaus Schwab and the DAVOS crowd] know better.  If you look at the structure of Europe, the European Union, he had a hand in that.  Yes, you still have a right to vote for an MP, but an MP has no right to make a law or veto a law.  The laws are written by the European Commission which never stands for an election.  The head of the EU is appointed.  She never stands for election.  So it's completely a facade that democracy even exists.  It does not exist in Europe at all.  The people have no right to say we don't like the way this is going, we're going to overthrow the government, we're going to vote them out.  You can't vote them out.  

16:20  Well, it seems that democracy has disappeared globally.  We've been screaming from the rooftop that we don't want mandatory vaccines, we don't want . . . everything that's going on.  We've got a dictator in Victoria now that can declare there's a pandemic even if there isn't one present.  We've seen a destruction of democracy around the world.  I wonder, Martin,  

16:40  Are you aware of any of Australia's leaders, or Scott Morrison, or DAVOS clique, as Reiner Fuellmich called it?  The carrot that Schwab is handing out [to the different governors, prime ministers, and leaders] is the end to democracy.  So they think they no longer have to be accountable to anybody, so they think they're going to be able to pull this off.  The whole COVID nonsense is about control.  I can tell you absolutely that Schwab told people that the virus was coming.  I heard rumors of that as early as September 2019.  I believe not only was it deliberately created in a lab but that it was deliberately planted in China in an effort to blackmail China into joining the Great Reset.  They had to get rid of Trump to do it, and they had to get both Putin and China under their wings as well.  Marxism would have worked had they had Europe and the United States at the same time.  But it's just nonsense.  I was actually called in by China to help them become capitalists.  I flew over there and it was interesting to watch.  The Chinese were substantially different than the Russians.  The Russians basically went from communism to an oligarchy.  In China, I was impressed that they were not interfering; they were letting everything go and they were tracking it.  They were tracking 249 varieties of tea in China.  I had no clue there were that many.  They wanted me to answer why this one tea was selling for $1 here but $5 someplace else.  I asked, "Where does it come from?"  And they said here.  And I said, "Well, first you have transportation costs.  Secondly, it must be a good tea, since some people are willing to pay more than something else."  They didn't understand these things.  (I wonder what year he is talking about.)

17:00  Obedience to Authority, Stanley Milgram, 1974. Came out of the Nazis during WWII, with the "just following orders" ethic.  He discovered that if the government tells them to do something, they'll do it.  This is why you see people driving around in their car by themselves with a mask.   

Civil unrest will accelerate the crash?  Yes.  Google the papers from Amazon on how to prevent a union from forming, based on a study that created a diversity index.  The more diverse a company is, the less likely they are to form a union. From that concept, can you extrapolate what it must be like trying to form a sovereign nation with the breadth and variety of immigration into the United States?  

Who Are the Enemies Bankrolling the Vaccine Program that Could Decimate the US Population?

This excellent video that should clarify for you who the enemy is that we're dealing with today and who is pushing the vaccines on a predominantly Christian nation.  Miss this at your peril.  Find the time to watch it, let it sear on your mind so that you shall have a framework from which to know the past and understand the current enemy.  The Bolsheviks hated the Christians.  Many of today's orthodox and secular Jews have inherited contempt for Christians, for the American goy.  This is only Part I.  Make the effort and schedule some time to watch it and the in the series.  Remember that all of the Federal Reserve Chairmen since the 1980s have been Jewish: Paul Volker, Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke, and Janet Yellen.  Do you think George Soros, a Jew, has made plans to oversee the mass slaughter of Americans as he finances open immigration into this country?  

EUROPA: The Last Battle, Part 2, WWI, 2017.  There are a total of 10 parts in the series.   

This next video does an excellent job of illustrating how the Bolsheviks' heirs, the indirect action committee of the Frankfurt School with Adorno, et al, worked to portray all of white culture as pathological while portraying Jewish families as the most acceptable forms of group identity.  

29:44  Towards the end of 1922, the Communist International, the Comintern, began to consider how they would take over Europe in the most effective way.  At Lenin’s initial, a meeting was organized at the Marx/Engels Institute in Moscow.  The aim of the meeting was to start the Marxist Cultural Revolution.  Among those present at the meeting was Georg Lukacs, a Jewish Hungarian aristocrat and the son of a banker.  In the summer of 1924, Lukacs moved to Germany.  Here he held the first meeting of a group of communist-oriented intellectuals.  This gathering was to be the foundation of the Frankfurt School.  The institute had been officially founded and funded by Felix Jose Weil, called the Institute for Social Research.  Later it would be known as the Frankfurt School.  These new Marxists, under the direction of Max Horkheimer, believed that Europeans were too attached to tradition, race, nation, family, and faith to be able to accept communism.  Antonio Gramsci, while in prison, described that Marxism and communism could only fourish only after a long march through the cultural institutions [of the west].  Only then after they had corrupted all western values and made life impossible for us, could they impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.  This was also what the Fabian Socialists [the British socialist organization] did to weaken the countries that slowly implemented international communism.  The mantra would now be "Change and destroy western culture before communism would be accepted."  Georg Lukacs believed that for a new communist culture to emerge, the existing European culture had to be destroyed.  There is no other way to get control of a society with strong moral values than to weaken those values."  He said 

31:41  

I saw the revolutionary destruction of society as the one and only solution to the cultural contradictions of the epoch . . . .  Such a worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries.  –Georg Lukacs 

31:55 

We must organize the intellectuals and use them TO MAKE WESTERN CIVILIZATION STINK.  Only then, after they have CORRUPTED ALL ITS VALUES AND MADE LIFE IMPOSSIBLE, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.    --Willi Munzenberg 

In his 1915 book, The Spirit of 1914: Militarism, Myth, and Mobilization, Nahum Goldman, top-level international Zionist and President of the World Jewish Congress, describes the Zionist's method for destruction of western civilization, which is required for transition into a new world order.  

The historical mission of our world revolution is to rearrange a new culture of humanity to replace the previous social system. This conversion and reorganization of global society requires two essential steps: firstly, the destruction of the old established order; secondly, design and imposition of the new order.  The first stage requires elimination of all frontier borders, nationhood and culture, public policy, ethical barriers and social definitions, only then can the destroyed old system elements be replaced by the imposed system elements of our new world order.  

The first tasm of our world revolution is destruction.  All social strata and social formations created by traditional society must be annhilated, individual men and women must be uprooted from their ancestral environment, torn out of their native environments, no tradition of any type shall be permitted to remain as sacred, traditional social norms must only be viewed as a disease to be eradicated, the ruling dictum of the new order is; nothing is good so everything must be criticized and abolished, everything that was must be gone. 

Wanting to learn more about the role that Jews played in the 20th century and about Zionism to understand their conflict, I searched Lew Rockwell for some archived articles.

 

"THE ATTORNEY'S JOB IS TO MANAGE RISK FOR THE ENTIRE COMPANY"

A "State of Emergency" is mutual aid between the counties and municipalities of the state.  Period.  All of this stay at home, business closures, stay 6-feet apart . . . zero validity.   --Peggy Hall

Just because they want to be a demonic cult, they can’t make you take an aspirin or a line of cocaine as a condition for coming into the store . . .                                                     --John Jay Singleton

A MUST-LISTEN.
Peggy Hall of the Healthy American interviews her friend, John Jay Singleton of PrivacyFight Co.  

Find John's Facebook page here.  

Find Peggy's interview on her Facebook page.

Peggy also posted documents needed to file Notices of Discrimination.

12:58
You have a right to rely upon the law. 

You want to pick a fight and win it. It’s a fight.  It’s a challenge.  Go to the chief counsel.

Set up a claim:

Court as last resort.

It’s illegal to stop you from walking, from your path.  It’s illegal to touch you.

Walking into a business that is open to the public, if you’re restrained in any way, it’s illegal.  It’s illegal to touch you.  It’s a crime.  Known as unlawful restraint or false imprisonment to prevent you from going somewhere.  In fact, the person doing it can get arrested.  Your liberty has been restrained against your will.  Someone wearing a mask and restraining your freedom is even worse.  Calling the police and making a scene is not the solution.  The best thing is to document it. 

If someone says you have to wear a mask, you can keep on walking and ignore them.  But are they legally obligated to serve you, to accept your purchases?  If they stand in front of you, they’re restraining you.  Go in the store, you do your shopping.  If Sprouts decides to deny you services, you’ll be informed of that.  The store manager will approach you in the store and inform you.  

“Are you denying me services because of the disability I have?”  
"No, we’re not doing that.  It’s just that you won’t comply with the law."  “Well, I just wanted to get confirmation that I am being denied services because of a disability.”  So I got his name.  Get that admitted.  Get that recorded: witness, video on your phone, paper, whatever. 

Because you have a cause of action because of an incident report, and you include that with a one-half page letter to the CEO or to the chief counsel.  The attorney’s job is to manage risk for the entire company.  That’s who figures out the insurance rates, and who makes deals with insurance, and who tells the store what its policy should be regarding spills.  You document it, you’re halfway there.  So, you get the admission and you get the person who is responsible for that facility for the premises at that time.  “Are you responsible for the entire facility at this time?”  He said yeah, cautiously, because that means something to these people.  Okay, so you’re requiring a medical intervention of my daughters, so if I act upon your medical intervention and I have them wear a mask like you’re saying and they go and play, and you’ve not conducted any medical examination so you don’t know their medical background, nor are you competent, are you the on-site physician?  Is there a physician on-site?  Let me ask you this, “Are you willing to accept the responsibility and liability if one of my daughters collapses in an unconscious state? Do you have insurance for this?  He said, “Look, you guys don’t have to do all of that stuff.  He was going to let us come in for free.  You bring the store manager over . . . very politely.  You get that person to identify, to admit that he is responsible, that she is responsible for that entire property.  And then you get them to say, okay, are you denying me services now?  What’s the reason: I’m unable to wear a mask or unwilling because of how it conflicts with my religious convictions?  And if they deny you service, you’re done, then leave.  You don’t have to push it to where the police come. 

If the police are called, that’s a case for more damages.  Doh!!!!  Because it’s exacerbating the situation unnecessarily.  They didn’t need to do that. 

They can make their own policies but they still have to be within the confines of the law.  Just because they want to be a demonic cult, they can’t make you take an aspirin or a line of cocaine as a condition for coming into the store, right?  You can make whatever policy you want, but you can’t just break the law.

Bring the Notice of Discrimination with you whenever you’re going out.  I just want to be clear that you’re requiring a medical intervention.  Are you the licensed physician on staff? Can I speak to the person who is in charge of the facility?  You confirm, “So you’re in charge of the entire facility at this time?” and they will either say yes or no.  if they deny you services, you create that incident report.  If they charge you with trespassing, I believe you should leave.  Start the paper trail at that point.  Don’t escalate. 

The moment I have a civil cause of action, I also have a criminal cause of action.  An employee wearing a mask and gets in your way, that’s a crime.  How so?  Realize what your rights are, what their obligations are, and what the law is.  If you feel intimidated, that’s a trespass on you.  That’s an assault. 

When you walk into a public store, a public accommodation, that’s not a private club.  It is not trespass when you’re in a public building and the manager tells you to leave.  When you go into a store, you have an irrevocable license to be there.  Why?  Because it’s open to the public.  The license/privilege was extended by all the corporate board members, owners, managers, investors, etc.  that’s the privilege.  I do not have the privilege to go into a private property, private accommodations, and help myself to things in that house.  I do not have a privilege to do that. 

So for someone to come along and impose illegal requirements or act in an unlawful way, has trespassed against you.  You are not trespassing.  Now because you have an irrevocable license does not mean you can do anything you want.  If you disrupt the business, or you hassle people, make a scene, it’s not trespass unless there is a violation. For example, if the cops are called and the cop stops you and says that you’ve trespassed and he wants you to leave.  Your response would be “Has there been a violation?”  the police officer will know what that is.  You don’t want to win an argument with a cop or persuade anybody . . . I don’t care.  I am trying to document what’s going on here.  I talked to officer jones on this date at this time, apparently, the manager called the police on me while I was shopping. At the time, the store was open to the public.  I asked the officer if he had evidence of any violation?  Am I accused of violating the public peace, breaching the peace, harassing anyone, what type of violation is it, Officer?  You’re not trying to be flippant with him or anything.  You literally want to know. 

Restaurants and stores have no duty to protect the public.  Yet you’re acting in that capacity; in fact, you don’t even have the capacity to protect the public.  An epidemic or a pandemic does not repeal laws.  The DOH has a problem.  They’re supposed to police the unlicensed practice of medicine, yet they’re pushing the unlicensed practice of medicine. 

59:30
You have an insurance liability for the person who is doing it on that entire property.  Then you have a liability for your county, your state, and your city.  They have a liability for pushing this.  They’re part of it.   

59:52
When you get to Civil Liabilities, you have religious convictions.  You can't be denied services because of a religious conviction.  You can't be denied services because of a disability if you're in a wheelchair, whatever.  If they're actionable, it means you can sue under that specific statute, like California Civil Code 51, which reads

3) California Civil Code section 51(b) establishes: "All persons within the jurisdiction of this state are free and equal, and no matter what their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orientation, citizenship, primary language, or immigration status are entitled to the full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all buseinss establishments of every kind whatsoever.   

The statute in Florida is Statute 760.  You can sue under that.  The way you sue though is that you don't just sue somebody, you have to document it and then you have to try to work it out.  Give them a chance to fix it.  But you also need to send a letter to the Administrative Agency that is supposed to oversee this type of violation.  Normally, it's like the Human Rights Commission.  In the Sprouts example, we can bring in the state agency that is supposed to deal with this.  

101:15   
John cites a page that is addressed to:

Department of Management Services

Florida Commission on Human Relations

4075 Esplanade Way, Suite 110

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-7020

(850) 488-7082  

If you state your case properly, you're probably going to get what you want without going to court.  They don't want to go to court; they don't want to go to court any more than you do because it's really expensive.  For them, it's really expensive.  If you go to court by yourself, you might pay $500 in filing fees over the period of a year, whereas for those guys, it's like $50,000.  As much as I don't like to sue, sometimes I win just because of the cost of litigation.  I'd really like to win on the merits.  

Here is John’s general statement:

I was recently shopping at Sprouts Farmers Market when I was confronted by the store manager [his name] who refused services because I would not dress like this employees or the other patrons and wear a mask or place a device over my head.  I did not file a police report because I really like shopping at the store and don’t want to get anyone in trouble, but I do have rights and I will defend them.

The following terms appear on Page 16 of Sprouts’ Code of Conduct & Ethics:

NON-DISCRIMINATION AND HARRASSMENT

Our team members are the cornerstone of our success.  Sprouts is committed to providing a work environment in which every team member has the opportunity to grow, develop, and contribute fully to our collective success.  Accordingly, sprouts’ written policy states that the business will not tolerate any unlawful discrimination and harassment based on race, religion, color, creed, national origin, ancestry, ethnicity, age, sex, pregnancy, childbirth, breast feeding and medical conditions related to pregnancy, familial status, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, lack of conformity to gender stereotypes, disability, marital status, citizenship, status as victims of domestic violence or sexual assault or stalking, military and veteran’s status, whistleblowers, or any other basis protected by applicable law. 

103:17
This part of your policy says that you have to respect these issues [and point].  So why not bring a case against them, not for violating your civil rights, but to get an injunction against them for something that they already admit to.  Why not bring a case where there really shouldn't be a dispute.  

103:45  Get the company's own policies and copy the pertinent sections.  I'm just suing so that you all have to comply with your own policy.  What are they going to say that they have another policy, a secret policy?  If they have a secret policy, that's not a store policy.  It has to be public.  Just like the FISA courts.  Those are not courts, even though they call them courts because they're secret.  There's not a thing such as a secret court.  What's John doing?  Is he saying that the FISA courts are by definition null and void?  So if you sue them for an injunction for violating their own policy, that incorporates all the laws they're supposed to follow and makes it a one-single issue which allows you to win on summary judgment.  A summary judgment says, 

Hey, Judge, you know what?  They've already admitted they have this certain policy and that they've already admitted that they've violated it, so I just want a summary judgment because there's no controversy here. 

An injunction enjoins them from breaking their own policy.  They're violating their own policy.  The court would order them to comply with their own policy.  And don't ask for money, I mean you can.  I would recommend not.  I don't think you should.  I think that you should just get what's called, "equitable relief," which is an injunction.  I think you can do it within 90 days.  We'll see.  I'm about to file this one.  I'm actually going to file one against Sprouts.  

I took the central argument after you identify the parties involved, the date, and everything.  This is what I told them, okay . . .

Mr. __________________ is not a licensed physician and on the date of ________________, demanded that I act upon his medical advice to undertake a medical intervention without any review of my medical records and without any medical examination, as a condition of patronizing his grocery store.

Subject, [last name], was not a licensed or insured physician.

Subject had not reviewed any of my medical records.

Subject had not conducted any medical examination.

Subject denied me any informed consent.

Subject demanded the medical intervention as a condition of patronizing his grocery store.

Subject failed to identify any legal authority for the demanded medical intervention. Subject failed to identify any medical necessity for the demanded medical intervention.

The medical intervention demanded by subject violates OSHA safety regulations under 29 CFR 1910.134. 

It's illegal all the way around.  Now, the thing I want to get into next is you've got the Human Rights Commission in your state, send your letter there.  Articulate the thing.  Use my letter.  Use my language.  That is what you do when you send the company the pre-suit mediation notice, the letter that says "Yeah, I was at your store, you did this thing that was wrong, I thought, and I am sending this letter to see if you can work this thing out.  And send it to the Chief Counsel and to the store manager.  And then send your report to the Dept of Health and send the letter to the Human Rights Commission in your state, your state agency.  Don't let the Chief Counsel or the store manager that you're complaining to the state, like the Dept of Health.  Don't let them know that because I think it's in your interest that you want them to make a decision quickly.  And if they see that you've filed a complaint to the state agency, the attorney might just say, "I'm gonna wait and see what happens there."  Because a lot of them are afraid to make a decision.  I want them to make a decision as quick as possible and in the background, I'm going to file these complaints where I can. 

The other health issue, which has been demonstrated, you'll see on the internet where people have measuring oxygen levels.  

He's referring to this video. There are others, but this is the one that broke this information first.  

There's a letter back from 2007 from OSHA, an enforcement officer, I think, he was talking about the actual science behind a particular regulation, which I mention here.  This [OSHA safety regulations under 29 CFR 1910.134] is an OSHA reg that covers the process by which an employer or an organization would make someone wear a mask on site.  There are certain precautions that have to be taken.  A physician has to be involved.  And a person being told to wear a mask HAS TO GIVE HIS CONSENT.  Even then you still can't make someone wear a mask.  

They have told us they're going to use test cases to see who is compliant . . . and see who is going to push back.  All of that has to be in writing.  And the beauty of that is that even with all of these regulations, and California is a leader in regulations, well, like you made the bed.  You've given us all of this . . .

Yeah, they have . . . .

And your idea of filing the violation with the Health Department is brilliant because they are the ones giving out the guidelines, and I believe that some of these Health offices are going to start backpedaling or . . . .  We've seen the Director of Health in Orange Country resing.  I think it was Ohio, Connecticut, Oregon, and Colorado, they've been falling like dominoes.  In your state, how many state and county health officers have resigned, have just been appointed?  Some of them are small, bit players, when they realize that they're placeholders, "I actually don't want to go to prison."    

John says, "That's right.  That's coming."  We'll see.  Serious.  These guys are going down.  I've just reported every member of my city council here for disaster fraud.      

You don't have to go to court or have an attorney.  You're going to use these tools and documentation against vaccinations, against contact tracing, against testing, you can use at your workplace, . . . what about the courts that require you to wear a mask?  Know property rights, privacy rights, irrevocable rights, places of public accommodation, 

The Chief Judge is the person who is responsible for the courthouse, and you want to in advance send a letter to the Chief Judge and let him know that he's accepting liability and responsibility and I have a whole list of things that he's going to be liable for and you just put him on notice.  You don't need his consent at all.  You just tell him.  1:12:48. 

1:12:50  OSHA spent decades establishing the science behind keeping workers safe mostly, and that has to do with wearing equipment that restricts air-flow or oxygen. Immediately when you put a mask on, it violates OSHA regulations, the moment you put it on.  And the longer you keep it on, you increase the chances of getting bacterial infections, like pleurisy, Legionnaires' Disease, and staphylococcus.  You're going to see a lot of people with welts and infections on their faces, you're going to see that more and more.  Imagine that you file a complaint with the DOH, for them purportedly requiring people to violate health and safety laws, and they're in charge of Health & Safety.  Who's above the Department of Health?  More than likely it's going to be your state Attorney General's Office.  And that's the person that prosecutes people for crimes.  That's the person who would prosecute somebody for dumping toxic waste or polluting the water, you know things like that.  So your next step up is the AG's office.  We're not going to get into that but this is I think is coming.  But right now we need to document what is going on.  Just look for your state's DOH.  Look for "unlicensed practice of medicine," download the form, fill it out, fill it out, fill it out.  Mail it in.  Just flood 'em with it.  

1:16:20

Complaint for Injunction Relief.  https://www.thehealthyamerican.org/notice-of-discrimination

John highlights a Florida statute

456.065, which makes it a crime to engage in the unlicensed practice of health care profession (without a valid license) and imposes civil and criminal penalties upon anyone giving medical advice or examinations without a license and the proper insurance and training.   

Okay, because jury trials are almost non-existent today, the best that you can hope for is an injunction—an authoritative warning or order from a court/judge.  You communicate.  And you allow the court to give you the remedy that you’re asking for, and this is the way that you do it.  Look at the courts as just another public facility. Don’t be afraid of it, it’s for you.  You’re not imposing on anyone, so we can use the court.  The rules are online.  John’s done 90% of the work here.  All that I have to do is fill in the blanks, put in your story—statements of fact—that’s if you have to do it.  Write it up.  Mail it to the Chief Counsel, and ask him, “Do you really want to do this?” and give them a few weeks to respond. 

I want to get to the Nursing Home case, and I think a lot of people want to/ought to hear that.

He saw his mechanic recently, he was doing the mask thing, and he couldn’t go into the building.  Hey, what’s going on?  Why you guys doing this?  Well, we have to do this or else our insurance company will cancel us.  The insurance company is doing this.  Okay, so if you’re insurance company says you have to pay more money or do another thing, they must have identified some new risk, okay.  Cause that’s what they’re about, right?  So I wrote up a letter for him.  Why don’t you send this letter to your insurance company and ask them, “What risk has changed, where have the actuarials been amended?”  The actuarials are what the insurance company bases the risk on.  Somebody collects statistics for years and years and years, and they go, “Oh, look, there’s a trend here.  Let’s gauge it this way, let’s price it this way, and then we’ll accept risk under these terms . . . right.  Well, ask them, “What’s changed?”  What new benefits am I getting?  What new services am I eligible for now that we’re doing these changes, right? 

Peggy: And they would have had to sign a new contract, wouldn’t they? 

John: Absolutely!  Well, possibly.  It’s a policy.  So they have to tell you what’s changed in your policy.  So can I see what’s in the updated policy?

John highlights a Florida statute 456.065, 

which makes it a crime to engage in the unlicensed practice of health care profession (without a valid license) and imposes civil and criminal penalties upon anyone giving medical advice or examinations without a license and the proper insurance and training.

We're showing how they're violating their policies and actually violating the law, and we're asking the court, "Hey, you know, this is grounds for . . . you know, they're reckless.  They already have a policy; we just want them to comply with their own policy.  And since they already have a written policy, there shouldn't be a dispute.  And therefore, bam, I should get my injunction, at least a temporary injunction.  And there are some technical issues, too, like a bond requirement.  

NURSING HOMES

Go and look up your state statutes regarding child protective services.  The dept of Children and Families.  Two Statutes: Public Health & Social Welfare that has to do with Resident Bill of Rights because they violate almost every single one.  There's no reason why we should lose this stuff.  

The right to civil and religious liberties.  The right to private and uncensored communication. 

Your federal statutes are under the Health and Human Services.  Under the United States code.  California Civil Code.  Google "Remedy for Nursing Home Abuse." 1:22:30.  For nursing homes, document everything and go to your state agency.  File a complaint or form with the Dept of Children & Families.  So what do you do?  

You find out which violations are being done.  List them all.  

Get the names of the manager.  

Get a copy of their policy.  Find the agency and file a report.  

"There's a pandemic and we have to break the law."  

"Oh, there's a pandemic and we have to rob your house."  

"Oh, there's a pandemic and we have to kill your dog."  No.  You don't get to do those things even if there is a pandemic.  You still have to follow the law.  Even during the civil war, they still had laws.  

1:25:00  Okay, where is the pandemic?  All I want to do is get past the Motion to Dismiss, and once I do that he's going to call me up and ask "What's it going to take to make this go away?"  Be polite to my wife and don't intimidate her when she walks into your store.  She's not wearing a mask.  That's it!  Attorneys want billable hours.  They have no connection to anything really.  

If you have to go to court, there are pleading requirements.  In a case where you have to sue, in order to establish liability for 

This comes from John Jay Singleton.  "How to Use an Injunction In or Out of Court Regarding Mask Wearing."  And here you'll find a Pleading Template with Line Numbering.

1:31:00  Naria is going to hold a filing party at her house.  And file Health Dept. violations against these stores who are acting as unlicensed doctors.  They're taking your temperature.  They're recommending you wear a mask. Excellent. 

Wow, it just keeps getting better.  Peggy explains that there's no state of emergency.  No pandemic.  No Scamdemic.  No asteroid.  No earthquake.  None of that can suspend the law.  They will tell you it can but it is completely unlawful.  The "State of Emergency" has nothing to do with you.  The "State of Emergency" is directed toward the agencies.  The "State of Emergency" says that the police and fire departments in Orange Country, CA can go up to San Francisco.  And that the people who work in hospitals in Bakersfield can go over to Riverside.  A "State of Emergency is mutual aid between the counties and municipalities of the state.  Period.  All of this stay-at-home, business closures, stay 6-feet apart.  Zero validity.  They sent up a trial balloon to see who would comply.  It's astonishing to all of us listening to see how many people complied willingly, eagerly, giddily, excitedly.  It does not give permission to the states to cancel the economy.  No store may enforce a policy that violates the law.  No "State of Emergency" suspends the law.  Period.  No executive order has anything to do with you.  If you work for the DMV and the governor says we're going to shorten your hours, yes that does affect you.  

John @ 1:34:00: Between 2004-2007, there was a law firm Walpoff and Abrahamson they were adding binding arbitration clauses to credit card agreements, which allowed the banks to bypass the court system and get a judgment against people and just take their money.  They didn't have access to the court then.  They were so greedy that that's illegal.  You can't promote that. CitiBank hunted John down.  They served his mom and his neighbor.  They couldn't find him.  Just to intimidate him.  So he hired the best criminal defense attorney.  Sue gov't officials for disaster fraud.  When you hit the IG's [Inspector General's] office and, that is going to bring down this COVID house of cards.  When the DOH [Dept. of Health] has been found to violate the law, that's a huge state financial problem.  There's money behind this.  There's unlimited money, and it's our money.  They're not going to succeed.  The WHO has formed the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, GPMB.  They're pushing money to all the countries to do this.  They're anticipating revolt.  COVID19 is a business franchise.