She never believed this was an airborne virus. She thought it was a contact poison or toxin. Virus does not mean animalcule that flies out of your mouth and infects someone else sick. Virus means toxin. You didn't "catch" a cold. You're toxic, and you're getting rid of the toxins.
Venom doesn't fit. Not say that vemom doesn't play a role in the vaxx'd or those developing illnesses or the dying. Nicorette gum is a good idea, but the venom is not the major cause of the disease. Not what she's seeing clinically. If venom were the problem, then children would have died and adults would have lived.
Despite all the literature that showed how dangerous the mRNA technology was, how bad it was on all the animal studies it's just too expensive. Claim is that the one mRNA technology that they'd actually gotten to market was for an ophthalmology issue. In 2018, the cost was almost $1 million for a treatment. How did they suddenly within 2 years supply billions of doses at less than $30 per dose? That doesn't make sense to Merritt.
Then she points to this video, Cancer: A Parasitical Infection. Video of German researchers telling us that cancer is a parasitical issue.
Nitazoxanide is a new thiazolide antiparasitic agent that shows excellent in vitro activity against a wide variety of protozoa and helminths. It is given by the oral route with good bioavailability and is well tolerated, with primarily mild gastrointestinal side effects. At present, there are no documented drug-drug interactions. Nitazoxanide has been licensed for the treatment of Giardia intestinalis–induced diarrhea in patients ⩾1 year of age and Cryptosporidum-induced diarrhea in children aged 1–11 years. At present, it is pending licensure for treatment of infection due to Cryptosporidium species in adults and for use in treating immunocompromised hosts. It represents an important addition to the antiparasitic arsenal.