Rosa Koire on UN Agenda 2021

Find the link to the show and its resources @ the Corbett Report.

The gist of Agenda 21: 

1976, Habitat I and Habitat II determined that land, privately owned land, is actually a threat to the equity, social equity of people on the planet, 

In this flashback video, James Corbett talks to Rosa Koire, author of "Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21" about the ideology and people behind Agenda 21.  https://t.co/3T1il0aK2y

— Activist Post (@ActivistPost) December 16, 2023

Additional gist of Agenda 21, 

says that the rights of the individual need to be balanced with the rights of the community, and if you're an American, or in many free countries, the individual's rights are guaranteed, individual rights are guaranteed to us by [the] constitution.  

but if you balance the rights of the individual with the rights of the community, those community rights are not delineated, they can change at any time depending on who the ruler or the government is, and they always have greater weight than the weight of the individual. 

This is a dated interview, 2012, but if you want to know in detail the power, intent, and scope of UN Agendas 2021 and 2030 and beyond, Rosa Koire is the one to listen to. 

The remarks about individual rights conflicting with community rights and how communitarianism was formed by the UN from that struggle were interesting.  See the 11:20 mark.  

4:14. Well I am a professional appraiser, a commercial appraiser.  I was a district branch chief for the California Department of Transportation for about 30 years and an expert witness testifying in land use and land value.  And about 10 or so years ago, I found it was pretty difficult to determine what property was worth because people were being restricted and what they could do with their property Special appraiser I was a district branch chief for the California Department of Transportation for about 30 years and an expert witness testifying in land use and land value and about 10 or so years ago I found that it was pretty difficult to determine what property was worth because people were being restricted and what they could do with their property.  And around that same time, I was elected to an oversight committee on a Redevelopment project, a huge project and I researched it and found that it was fraudulent.  So, we sued to stop that.  And while doing research to find out what was behind that Redevelopment project, I found United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development. 

5:03.  Let's talk about your book and how that came together in the type of research that you've done over the preceding years into this agenda.

5:11. The book is I wrote the book because I am traveling all over the United States and I just simply wasn't able to go everywhere and I have the information and was able to put it together in a way that's very clear and understandable and it's a quick short read and in that way I was able to reach a lot more people because United Nations Agenda 21 sustainable development is a global plan but implemented locally so this is really important because it doesn't come called "Agenda 21," so you have to know what it looks like in your town to be able to recognize it.

5:53. Every time we have someone on to talk about Agenda 21 has their own way of summing up what that is and how it's unfolding so what's your take on what is United Nations Agenda 21?  

6:04. Agenda 21 is the Action Plan.  It's the blueprint to inventory and control all land, all water, all plants, all minerals, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all information, all energy, all education, and all human beings in the world.  That's it it's totally comprehensive.

6:28. It's so comprehensive it goes into many different aspects of everyone's everyday life that it's staggering to think that so few people have even heard of this Agenda 21 let alone know what it is and how can it function so that it maintains that level of secrecy while being completely out in the open? 

6:48. Yeah it's brilliant.  It's a stealth plan, and it's operating in plain sight.  And that is because it's called by so many different names.  You'll see it in your town as a regional plan generally, such as "One Bay Area," "Vision 2025" or "Our Future 2050," or something like that because what it is the plan was signed on to it was a United Nations agreement signed on to in 1992 by our President George H.W. Bush along with 178 international leaders.  And you're going to hear that it's an old, dusty plan, that it's not binding, that it has no impact on you.  That's a lie.  The truth is that it was brought back to the United States through the President's Council on Sustainable Development back in 1993 and all federal agencies changed their policies to conform with United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development.

7:50. That's right.  Let's go back to some of the beginnings of this, because as you indicate it was for scientists in agreement in 1992 at the Rio Earth Summit, but it has its roots in policies that go back at least . . . let's talk a little bit about the history of these ideas of Sustainable Development and how they came together.

8:09. Yeah, it's great.  It's the kind of thing that you ask yourself, how could I be against sustainability?  Just sounds so great.  I mean who wants to be unsustainable?  And, of course, the term "Sustainable Development" is a term that comes right out of the United Nations, 1987, the Brundtland Commission from the World Commission on Environment and Development, and they wrote a book called Our Common Future, and in that the book the term "sustainable development" was first coined and formally given a definition,  and that is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations, 2030.  Sounds great, right?  But this has its roots and prior meetings of the United Nations in 1972 and then again in 1976, Habitat I and Habitat II, determined that land privately owned land is actually a threat to the equity, social equity of people on the planet, and this is a very vital part of the United Nations Agenda 21 because it actually is an attack on private property ownership.  Also, you have to remember that we, ourselves, are our own most important private property, and this plan actually enables domestic surveillance, the National Defense Authorization Act, drones, and control of all of our activities on the planet.

9:45. I think there must be a variety of reasons why this is being pushed by the people that it is, but I guess if there is a guiding ideology behind this, I've heard it cited before that communitarianism might be that ideology provides the framework for this that provides the framework for this agenda.  So what is communitarianism, and how does that play into this agenda?

10:04. Communitarianism says that it's an ideology, it's a political and social philosophy, that says that the rights of the individual need to be balanced with the rights of the community, and if you're an American, or in many free countries, the individual's rights are guaranteed, individual rights are guaranteed to us by [the] constitution cannot be taken away by any government .  We are born with them, right, but if you balance the rights of the individual with the rights of the community, those community rights are not delineated, they can change at any time depending on who the ruler or the government is, and they always have greater weight than the weight of the individual.  That means that you're always going to see that the individual rights are a threat to the community in which case we're talking about the global community.

11:06. That's right it does kind of flip the idea of Rights on its head the rights that are enshrined in the Bill of Rights or even in the ones they pay lip service to in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are all guarantees of individual rights and liberties but some now we're expected to take on board the idea that there are communal rights that somehow supersede those of the individual so where does this idea come from and who are the types of people who are pushing this?

11:34. Well this is an ideology you can go back to the Fabian socialists.  In the 1800s if you want to if you're interested in doing that you know sort of a theoretical search on the development of this plan but I think it goes back further I mean obviously it goes back to any ideology that institutes a dictatorship or oligarchy.  But in our case you know because we are a free nation used to have the trappings of socially acceptable philosophy and that's where communitarianism comes in what we're talking about here are the three E's: Environment, Economy and Equity, social Equity you know like when you see those three circles, the image of United Nations Agenda 21, or Sustainability.

Several visual representations of sustainability and its three dimensions: the left image shows sustainability as three intersecting circles. In the top right it is a nested approach. In the bottom right it is three pillars.^[1] The schematic with the nested ellipses emphasizes a hierarchy of the dimensions, putting  environment as the foundation for the other two.

Logos are always more symbolism than than substance.  They serve as ID badges so you can track lineage from one period of an organization to another. 

12:20. It looks like a Venn diagram where __________? of economy, ecology and social equity come together, that's sustainable development.  But Equity is a vital part of this because this is the illusion where you're going to have a balanced world where everybody is going to have . . . no one is going to gave too much, you know, the super wealthy 1% is going to go away and the poor will all have plenty of food and water and everything else they need.  But the concept, the overarching concept, that's the green mask as I call it one of the reasons why I call my book, Behind the Green Mask because, in fact, what this does is that it enables total takeover of our resources, both natural and [man-made], by those who want to totally control the earth.

13:17.  Well let's talk about some of those people who want to totally control the Earth and people who have been instrumental in this agenda of course people like Maurice strong or instrumental in the 1992 Rio Earth Summit who are some of the figures who have been spearheading this Agenda 21?  

13:36. Obviously, we are going to have the ultra wealthy, through hereditary ownership of property own a huge amount of the world, the ruling royalty classes, particularly the English own a huge amount of world;  the Catholic Church owns a tremendous amount of the world, the Vatican

Anybody that's got a couple of acres of land and his own water supply and can grow his own food, that kind of thing, or have some sheep and some chickens, these people are a threat to the collectivist society

it's implemented on the ground . . . through . . . joining together between corporations, non-governmental organizations, and governments in order to cut out your individual voter and instead to take that to a level where we literally cannot penetrate. Rosa Moire

Tried to get the gist of it in one post..  https://t.co/RVzir8RcO0 pic.twitter.com/Sxjt1iCF2H

— André (@pidgeonchest) November 26, 2023

G. EDWARD GRIFFIN

Agenda 21 is a code name for a master plan originated at the United Nations in 1992 to change the political and economic system of the world to one of total collectivism. In order to do that, people must not be allowed to have Independence, they must be dependent on the state for everything; otherwise, they won't be easily controlled by the state. That means they can't have private property mostly; they cannot have land of their own; they have to live in preferably high-rise apartments that are provided to them by the state as a benefit so to speak, "Oh, good, we got a free apartment," but these people at the top want all humans to be dependent on the largess of the state. That means that they don't want anybody living out in the boonies. Anybody that's got a couple of acres of land and his own water supply and can grow his own food, that kind of thing, or have some sheep and some chickens, these people are a threat to the collectivist society because they aren't going to go to the politicians and say, "Please feed me. Please clothe me. Please give me shelter." They tend to be independent. That's the secret behind Agenda 21 they want people out of the country. They want corporations out there growing all the food and that kind of thing, but they don't want anybody living out there because that way they cannot be controlled. In order to control mankind, we have to get them all into the big cities; we have to roll them up and stack them up, get them dependent on the state for their food, their shelter, their electrical power, their water, everything. That's the dirty secret behind Agenda 21.

ROSA MOIRE

United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development. It is the inventory and control plan, inventory and control of all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all food, all energy, all information, and all human beings in the world. And this was a plan that was agreed to by 179 nations back in 1992. It's a United Nations plan. It's called the Agenda for the 21st Century.

And so many of us around the world think that sustainable development just sounds so great. Isn't it about recycling and creative reuse and creating energy and food resources for everyone? And the answer is no. It really is not it's about moving populations into city centers, concentrated city centers and clearing them out of the rural areas. It's constructed of non-governmental organizations, corporations and government in order to dictate and regulate what it is that happens around the world. Regionalization is the stepping stones to globalization, and globalization is the standardization of all systems. All systems have to be brought into harmony in order to control them all, and the goal of Agenda 21 is one-world government and total control from a central unit the principles are public-private partnerships which is fascism. And this is how it's implemented on the ground is through this joining together between corporations, non-governmental organizations, and governments in order to cut out your individual voter and instead to take that to a level where we literally cannot penetrate. This is a corporatocracy. It's a totalitarian state being developed right now all over the world, while we are moving towards the end game. We are not there, and this is the opportunity that all of us have to stand up, to speak out. We are free and we need to continue to be free, and I do believe that we will win but we have to become aware that there is a fight.

DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH

The role of the who appears to be adverse in both of these the role of the who appears to be operating within a biopharmaceutical compound Plex a syndicate a complicated Syndicate that has formed over time it includes the w h o United Nations the United Nations the world economic forum The Gates Foundation Rockefeller Foundation the welcome Trust GAVI, CEPI, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation, the GATES Foundation and the WEF formed largely. The Department of State in the United States the National Institutes of Health, the CDC, the FDA the MHRA in the UK, the TGA in Australia, SAHPRA in South Africa, the EMA gere in Europe. This grouping of non-governmental organizations with governmental Public Health agencies is operating as a unit. They are carefully coordinated, and the impact has been adverse.

ARCHBISHOP VIGANO

The WEF is threatening the heads of government of the 20 most industrialized nations in the world to carry out the Great Reset. It is a global coup d'etat, against which it is essential tht people rise up. Those who govern nations have all become either enslaved or blackmailed by this international mafia.

ROSA KOIRE, 2013: UN Agenda 21 is a transition from a representative government to government or governance by an unelected boards and commissions

00:50.  Someone said to me just a couple of days ago that they said, "You know it seems to me that people in the United States are kind of obsessed with the concept of freedom," and what I thought to myself was, "But aren't we all?"  I mean isn't this the nature of the human being to be free? And even though, of course, it's like Dylan said, Bob Dylan, "Are birds free from the chains of the Skyway?"  No, of course, not.  We are subject to the Natural laws, but the laws of man should not be used to subjugate human beings.  We are free.  So what I'm going to be talking about is United Nation's Agenda 21 Sustainable Development, and I'm sure unlike people in the United States you may have heard about this Global agreement.  But in the United States, anyone who talks about it is considered to be and labeled a conspiracy theorist, an extremist, kind of a nut, and the Press will malign you.  In fact, up until very recently the Press denied, the United States press and the World Press, denied that Agenda 21 exists.  But it does.  It exists, and it is the blueprint.  It is the action plan to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all means of production, all construction, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world, inventory and control.  The action plan.  It's the real deal.  It's a transition from a representative government to government or governance governance by an unelected boards and commissions

"INFERTILITY: A Diabolical Agenda Documentary - Depopulation Agenda 21"

"INFERTILITY: A Diabolical Agenda Documentary - Depopulation Agenda 21" Short Clip https://t.co/bJhpofwRir

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) January 10, 2024

W.H.O. with Gates's influence, support by participation, administered a million vaccines to Kenyan women that were designed to sterilize them without their knowledge and against their will, pretending it was a tetanus program.  Included in the tetanus vaccines without anybody knowing Human Gonadotropin hormones which interact with tetanus toxoids essentially as a chemical castration drug for women.  And he gave that, the W.H.O. gave that to at least a million women in Kenya, and they had similar programs in Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines.

00:50. My journey [Antoninah Mutinda] with the miscarriages was very difficult.  The first one I carried, that pregnancy lasted for about 3 weeks.  I got pregnant again and I must have carried that pregnancy for about 4 weeks. I got pregnant a third time, and I carried that pregnancy for 10 weeks I knew there was a problem 

01:19.  [Dr. Wahome Ngare] When a woman is pregnant, her baby produces HCG through the placenta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin.  

01:23. Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, HCG.  What is that?  

01:29. It's the first signal that tells a woman she's pregnant.  It tells the ovaries to produce a second hormone called progesterone that then maintains the pregnancy.

01:40. I was tested and my anti-hCG levels were way up.

01:48. What does this mean when a woman has antibodies and an immune reaction to HCG produced in her own body.

01:57. If you create antibodies against HCG, the minute the new baby forming in the woman's womb starts producing HCG it is destroyed like it was bacteria or viruses.  So that the signal is completely lost fore and therefore the ovaries do not produce progesterone if you have high enough levels of anti-hcg antibodies then the woman would actually just become sterile.

02:29. But how does a woman develop antibodies to HCG effectively in autoimmune disease where the body is attacking itself this was the question that was asked and answered by vaccine developers seeking to create an anti-fertility vaccine on behalf of the World Health Organization, "Development of Immunological Methods of Fertility Regulation," J. Spieler, 1987, starting in the early 1970s.  This research and development program was undertaken in response to perceived overpopulation.

"Structured Vaccines for Control of Fertility and Communicable Diseases," G. P. Talwar, 1984.

02:57.  From 1972 to 1992 they spent 20 years funding the research for the development of that vaccine.

03:04.  These facts are indisputable.  W.H.O. through its Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation, has been supporting research on a synthetic vaccine against the HCG molecule to immunize a woman against getting pregnant or

"A Vaccine That Prevents Pregnancy in Women," G. P. Talwar, Proceedings of the Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1994. 

Abort a successful pregnancy scientists discovered that physically combining the beta subunit of HCG with the tetanus toxoid using the routine tetanus vaccine was the most effective approach.  Not only did the woman develop antibodies against tetanus, she also produced antibodies against HCG, including that produced by her own body.

03:49.  The W.H.O. has been spending tens of millions of dollars developing these sterilization drugs to surreptitiously give women. These are studies developing drugs; they are saying, "Here is how this works and we tested it on people and it works."  And then when it came time to use those products, the W.H.O. spent all those years developing they gave it to a million women surreptitiously without their knowledge so the papers don't say here's what we're going to do we're going to sneak up on them and ambush them.  The papers say here's how you develop this vaccine and you hide it in a tetanus vaccine.  Then when it actually came time for them to do the program, they did not tell the women and they were caught by the Catholic Medical Association of Kenya who noticed at first that usually when you give a tetanus vaccine, you only give one dose, and it's good for 10 years.  they were told to give 5 doses over 6 months which made the doctors of the Catholic Medical Association say something was wrong here and it was only given to women of childbearing years, women from 14 to 34 years old, which was weird because men also get tetanus.  Third, there was no tetanus outbreak at that time, and that's when the doctors of the Catholic Medical Association got a hold of the vials and tested them at half a dozen different labs and they all came back, most of them not all of them, but most of them came back and said yeah it contains this drug . . . 

Here is the full video.

ROSA KOIRE: this is "regionalization and world government: You use trade agreements to destroy boundaries and you actually cannot make local law that breaks those treaties.

"This breaks national boundaries, it breaks state boundaries, it breaks county boundaries. It's also a project of the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation," the late author says. She adds that this is "regionalization and world government: You use trade agreements to destroy boundaries and you actually cannot make local law that breaks those treaties." --Rosa Koire,

"I'm gonna show you the new map of the United States of America...[these are] mega-regions...*mega* *regions*...these are...city-states...[and]...the federal government...is in [the] process of creating [them]."

The late Rosa Koire, author of BEHIND THE GREEN MASK: UN Agenda… pic.twitter.com/YXcJWkYTu4

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) June 30, 2024

Full video. 

 

"I found out about this because I saw that people were not being able to use their land, and I looked behind that, and I found Agenda 21," Koire says. She adds, "The federal government of the United States is doing this—is in [the] process of creating 'mega-regions,' which are, essentially, crossing national boundaries." Koire highlights one specific region, "Cascadia," which will be made up of a portion of Washington state, Oregon state, Idaho, and even Vancouver. Koire notes that the "Southern California and Texas triangle areas" will include parts of Mexico.

"This breaks national boundaries, it breaks state boundaries, it breaks county boundaries. It's also a project of the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation," the late author says. She adds that this is "regionalization and world government: You use trade agreements to destroy boundaries and you actually cannot make local law that breaks those treaties." 

Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21, Rosa Koire, 2011.

Interesting, or telling, that Amazon does not allow its affiliate customers to post a direct link to social media for this product, er, ahem, book. 

VIA TREATIES, TRUMP IS BREAKING NATIONAL, COUNTY, AND STATE BOUNDARIES. BTW, YOU CANNOT MAKE LOCAL LAW THAT BREAKS THOSE TREATIES

"I'm gonna show you the [New World Order] map of the United States of America...[these are] mega-regions...*mega* *regions*...”

“Cascadia” will be made up of Washington state, Oregon, Idaho, and VANCOUVER.

Sounding familiar????? pic.twitter.com/Ly2ECOIlb7

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) January 7, 2025

What in the actual F? https://t.co/a0eiAV6hOd

— Shannon Joy (@ShannonJoyRadio) January 7, 2025

Her name is Rosa Koire.  Read her Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21, Rosa Koire, 2011.

I'm going to show you the new map of the United States of America.  you may not be able to see this very well.  We have 50 states in the United States, but these are mega regions.  Mega regions.  Mega regions.  Mega, meaning large.  Mega regions.  These are the city-states.  These are large cities that are being made larger.  And remember, I told you that the gray area is the wildlands.  That's going to be the area that no one will have access to.  And you know I haven't told you anything about myself.  I was a legal witness, an expert witness in land use and land valuation for my government, for the State Department of Transportation, expert witness, testified in court, and I found out about this because I saw that people were not being able to use their land and I looked behind that and I found Agenda 21.  This is true, okay?  The federal government of the United States is doing this.  It's in process of creating mega-regions that are essentially crossing national boundaries.  This is Cascadia.  It used to be a portion of Washington State, Oregon State, Idaho, and Vancouver area, British Columbia in Canada.  The Southern California and Texas triangle areas include part of Mexico.  This breaks national boundaries.  It breaks State boundaries.  It breaks County boundaries.  It's also a project of the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation.  Regionalization and world government.  You use trade agreements to destroy boundaries, and you actually cannot make local law that breaks those treaties.  

IDAHO: The state wants to take property-owners' water

The US Government Is Attempting To Seize All Water Rights For All Bodies Of Water On American’s Property in Idaho

If Residents Do Not Register For Each Body Of Water Individually By Their Timeline The State Takes Control & Owns Them Forever 🚨

“Spring on their property, if you… pic.twitter.com/YpdoALlvlg

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) December 25, 2023

This is the state government being driven by globalism to take property owners property it is essentially Agenda 21 protocol the globalists hate private property owners and hate private property it's like that question what is OUR oil doing underneath YOUR land.  Property comes with a bundle of rights, rights to the natural resources above and below your land at a certain, defined reach.  But this is not a squabble over the reach of your property; this is a land grab starting with H2O.  Don't register your bodies of water, and they'll fall into the hands of the state.  Again, Agenda 21.  

Podcast Discussion with Bruce de Torres on TNT Radio, by @sasha_latypova https://t.co/2It7Joi3VN

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) November 30, 2023

The video includes a transcript. 

0:18

This is WorldStage, exposing the tyrannies and exploring our power with deep dives into history, current events, dangerous trends, and the nature of reality.

0:30

Before I introduce my guest, I want to talk for just a moment about

0:34

A post at conservativewoman.co.uk from November 15th titled Pilot warns of airline industry disaster due to COVID vaccines.

0:47

Captain Shane Murdoch says the air industry is quote poised on the precipice of disaster close quote.

0:55

A pilot for more than 40 years and a qualified air accident investigator

1:00

He has found official data that backs up his claim of impending global catastrophe.

1:04

He adds, quote, when correlated, the data indicate there is an enormous problem that is having and will have a significant impact on aviation safety worldwide.

1:16

There is enough evidence to be sending out red flags.

1:20

It's a great piece at conservativewoman.co.uk.

1:26

From November 15th, Pilot warns.

1:29

of Airline Industry Disaster Due to COVID Vaccines.

1:34

With me this hour is Sasha Latypova whose on her substack writes, I could not become a professional artist, so I became a pharma and medical device R&D executive.

1:50

Her substack is titled Due Diligence and Art, "Uncovering Fraud in Pharmaceutical R & D and Manufacturer."

2:00

And by popular demand, I will include my art pieces that have nothing to do with pharma.

2:05

SashaLatypova.substack.com.

2:43

The Big Plan and Intention from the Outset.

2:47

Is that a good summary?

2:50

Yes, correctly.  The problem is that, well, it was interesting that in your previous segment, Angelina Jolie was quoted using the word kill box because it is a military term, and my colleague Katherine Watt and I, in our investigation, called the system of law and regulations that was put in place before the so-called COVID pandemic a kill box, and it's a global kill box.

3:23

So it's the same concept of deploying the military onto the global population to cause harm, destruction, killing, maiming, and it's indiscriminate.

3:35

There is no racial preference here or any sort of preference.

3:38

It's basically designed to destroy the world as we know it, destroy our constitutional governance, and nation-states, reduce the economic prosperity of the people, kill as many people as possible, and enslave the rest.

3:59

And so we're living through this, through this scenario unfolding and the hot kinetic war and that that has been also raging in Ukraine and now in the Middle East.  That's also part of the same plan.

4:22

I've heard folks whom I respect for their research and analysis say that the Chinese created, I think particularly the Pfizer shot, maybe others, and they're not aware that there's the same injury and death in China.

4:41

Are you aware of any distinction that China's kind of been protected from the harm of these shots?

4:48

No, I personally do not believe that China created these vaccines and China created this virus.  And China is attacking us.  That's not true.  The US government created these shots.

5:02

And US government created whatever they sprayed around and deployed as an initial to generate initial symptoms of COVID, which wasn't dangerous.  It was just to scare people and to initiate this whole global panic.  But it's not a Chinese plan.  It's the US government's plan.

5:19

The US government is working for their paymasters, which are not American people.

5:24

And this is a kind of a global private mafia cartel.  But this is the US government, US military, DARPA, DITRA, and Fort Detrick.  the NIH, the CDC scientists, all of them, and obviously a lot of US dollars involved in the creation of both the chemicals that were used to generate initial COVID symptoms and then these lethal shots that are being deployed.

5:52

And China is a minor partner, they're an investor, co-investor or you know members of Communist Party leadership or co-investors in these vaccines.  And so they're financially benefiting from it.  They're not shielded, the Chinese population is not shielded from any of this kind of poisoning and dissemination.  They use their own poisons.  They do have a partnership with Moderna now to manufacture the same shots in China, the mRNA shots in China for the Chinese population.  So, you know, China is not shielded from it at all.  But they're a participant in it, not the leader.

6:30

Thank you.

6:34

Those folks, I'm going to strongly recommend that they look at your work very, very closely because they're smart and they're certain.

6:43

And it's a nuance, frankly, compared to the knife at our throat and what's happening.

6:51

And I'm really intrigued how you described

6:56

how the how something was given us maybe you said sprayed that's my experience my personal experience is I went out one night in late 2021

7:08

with a friend, we had a bite at an empty and small place.

7:12

I interacted with nobody.

7:14

I went to the restroom at the end of the meal.

7:17

I woke up the next morning sick as a dog.

7:19

And for the next 10 days, I got sicker, more achy, painy, more dizzy than anything at any time in my life.

7:29

And it took another 10 days to start to subside.

7:37

and I'm intrigued by, tell me what you can about how they gave a sickness before the vaccines, please.

7:47

Yeah.  Well, so, you know, I can't definitively determine what it is and it's long gone, right?  And also, it's not one thing.  They're likely using multiple modalities and vectors.  But what I can definitively tell you, it's not a virus and it's not a bioengineered virus.  And there's no ability to make living things in the labs, no matter what those fear-mongers tell you.  They don't have this ability.  They definitely don't have an ability to create something both highly deadly or toxic and spreadable at the same time.

8:23

So highly transmissible at the same time.

8:25

So you can do either one or the other.

8:27

You can create, and you can certainly create poisons.

8:30

That's, I mean, that's ancient art.

8:32

It goes back thousands of years.

8:34

So you can poison people.

8:35

You can poison individuals.

8:37

You can poison small groups of people in the same location.

8:41

And, you know, there are multiple vectors that can be used.

8:46

Water, food.

8:47

Today, we have certainly a lot of ability to create different chemicals, chemicals, toxic chemicals, also combinations of chemicals and biologics, such as, for example, DNA plasmids, which are starting point of all biologics manufacturing.

9:06

And so these kinds of things and also there's a long-standing

9:11

you know, experience and tradition, both in the Soviet Union and the in the United States, in the biological and chemical weapons development of aerosolization of things and also using subway systems as both test platforms and deployment platforms and also spraying stuff from the airplanes.

9:33

There were now, you know, infamous famous experiments that were conducted in San Francisco, for example, spraying

9:40

Due Diligence by Sasha Latypova

9:52

Um, so those methods exist.

9:55

Uh, they're now, they now have more capabilities to design both biological substances and chemical substances and deploy them in these ways.

10:03

And so you can, and so what you have described as your, your symptoms, those are symptoms of poisoning, you know, because poisoning as opposed to having, you know, a common cold is, uh, is basically very rapid onset.

10:17

extremely rapid onset.

10:18

And then you have this, this, you know, you're getting sicker and sicker and sicker.

10:22

And then it's just kind of washes out of your system over time.

10:25

And so you recover.

10:27

And that's what majority of people experienced, including me.

10:29

And in my case, the onset was hours, you know, so, and, and simultaneously me and my husband, that doesn't happen with common cold, you know, common cold takes time to, to, to develop those systems, symptoms.

10:44

But, you know, we went to a shop, we came out, two hours later, we have high fever, we're sick, and symptoms are neurological also, that very characteristic loss of taste and smell, very, very bizarre, it's not congestion, it's not common cold, it's a neurological poisoning, because we've inhaled something, you know, something that we were poisoned by aerosol.

11:07

So that's what I want people to notice in their environment.

11:13

Don't listen to what the TV tells you because they also simultaneously with these symptoms, they're blaring propaganda at you.

11:20

Oh, you know, people in China dropping on, you know, dead on bus stops.

11:24

And, you know, so everyone has this idea and they had this scary novel virus.

11:29

Well, they're spraying chemicals on you and creating the symptoms.

11:32

And then, but they were not lethal.

11:35

So you recovered, I recovered.

11:36

Yeah, it's, it's nasty, but it's not dangerous, really.

11:41

But it was designed to create panic to drive people into the hospitals where the kill box was deployed.

11:47

That's the first part of the kill box was to use panic fear PCR testing, which is which is false positive.

11:56

not diagnostic.

11:57

So they target people by PCR into the COVID ward and the COVID ward is operated by the federal government and by the military where they literally, you know, murder people by putting them on ventilators, sedating them, dehydrating them, removing food, not giving access to relatives, kidnapping them, and then giving them remdesivir, which shuts down kidneys.

12:22

and that creates, you know, fluid in lungs.

12:25

And then they're saying, oh, it's respiratory death.

12:28

And then they're calling it COVID and giving hospital bonuses, huge bonuses, 20% kick for using remdesivir.

12:36

And then giving bonuses to the coroner to lie on the death certificate that there was a COVID death, even if it was like a bullet to the head.

12:44

So that's how they created it, the COVID panic and pandemic.

12:51

And are you based in the United States?

12:53

Are you talking primarily about the United States?

12:56

Yes, I am.

12:58

I am a US citizen.

12:59

I live in Nevada.

13:00

And I am talking about the United States because that's majority of my research.

13:06

I did look into European situation as well.

13:10

This was

13:11

the same sort of COVID death protocol was practiced in the United Kingdom.

13:15

And I know this for sure.

13:17

In the United States, it is still practiced.

13:19

So as of late September, I have experienced this COVID death protocol with one of my relatives, we barely saved her from it.

13:27

And I, you know, I published on it, I went on media and interviewed in one of upstate New York hospitals, that protocol is still being practiced.

13:39

I believe on your sub stack, and I know other places as well, but on your sub stack, Sasha, you have presented more than enough evidence and documentation to convince a lay person and also professionals along these lines, right?

14:01

And that's the goal of what you're producing and publishing, right?

14:05

Yep, exactly.

14:06

I want the professionals to understand how exactly they were fooled because this whole setup was designed not to just fool general public who doesn't know any better.

14:16

It was designed to fool the professionals like myself who worked in pharmaceutical research and development for 25 years.

14:23

like doctors and nurses and, you know, so people of a professional class so that they close their eyes and fulfill the orders of CDC and don't ask any questions.

14:34

But, you know, I was out of the industry by the time this whole thing started and it really shocked me what they were pulling off and so I started looking into it myself and uncovering what really is going on.

14:48

And lest anyone think I'm saying

14:52

Read and Believe Just What Sasha Latypova Writes.

14:56

I know that Catherine Watt, Catherine with a K, at bailiwicknews.substack similarly has a body of evidence, facts, and figures that would have the same persuasion

15:11

And if you would agree with that, tell me.

15:13

And if there's a third, just for fun, before we go down other avenues, who besides you and Catherine would you refer people to so that they could get persuaded about the truth of the picture you've painted?

15:27

Yes, so I definitely recommend people to read Katherine's analysis because it helped me when I found her work over a year ago.

15:35

It helped me to finally understand what actually was going on.

15:39

So here's what else Sasha and here's what

15:43

We're going on right now, I'm reintroducing you, Sasha Latypova, and here is important information from TNT Radio.

15:53

You should hear what Ross Cameron is talking about.

15:55

I see there's a new trend taking place sweeping the internet of what they're calling sort of technology naked walks, where you go for a walk without your iPhone.

16:09

Due Diligence by Sasha Latypova

16:31

Ross Cameron on today's News Talk Radio, TNT.

16:32

I said, could she die?

16:33

And the doctor said she could.

16:35

It was so scary.

16:59

When I started clawing at my neck and trying to breathe and I thought, you know, what are we going to do if I die here?

17:11

How's everyone going to go on?

17:15

When someone's gravely sick or injured in the bush, they rely on the Royal Flying Doctor Service.

17:21

But now the Flying Doctor needs your help to fund vital medical equipment and supplies.

17:27

Please search Flying Doctor online to give a regular gift of just $10.

17:32

You can help equip the Flying Doctor's teams to respond to any emergency anywhere.

17:37

Search Flying Doctor online.

17:40

Become a part of the Royal Flying Doctor Service and help save lives in the bush.

17:48

The Net Zero Con will leave millions of citizens dependent on state handouts.

17:52

It isn't a theory.

17:54

It's an agenda.

17:55

There is no climate emergency.

17:57

On air 24-7.

17:59

This is today's news talk radio, TNT.

18:03

And I am Bruce Tataris.

18:04

This show is world staging with me is Sasha Latypova, intrepid researcher and publisher of the truths about COVID and the shots.

18:15

that the world needs to know so we can stop the noose from tightening even more around our necks.

18:23

Sasha, I had asked you about any other researcher or source for folks besides yourself and Catherine Watt, and you were in the middle of the point.

18:34

I got distracted.

18:35

What were you saying?

18:36

Did I interrupt you?

18:37

What would you tell me next?

18:39

Yeah, so definitely check out Catherine Watt's Bailiwick News sub stack, but also I want to point out other people that I personally respect very much and look at their work.

18:54

So Dr. Mike Eden is one of my friends now.

18:58

He's from United Kingdom and he used to be a

19:03

a very senior executive, executive vice president, I think at Pfizer, was running a respiratory therapeutic area research and development.

19:15

And he was very early on speaking against these COVID shots, the mRNA injections.

19:25

And

19:26

His predictions that he made in December 2020, he and his colleague Dr. Wuderk from Germany submitted a complaint, an urgent request to the European Medicines Agency to stop the approval of these injections.

19:41

they outlined all the risks and all the danger that they knew just by examining the design of the product.

19:49

So the product wasn't on the market.

19:51

They didn't have any access to the clinical trial data.

19:53

They were just external researchers looking at the design of the proposed product and outlining all the risks and danger that they were seeing.

20:03

And now, three years later, it's all true.

20:07

All of the things that they pointed out came to be true.

20:11

And so that's as accurate prediction as it gets and as accurate demonstration that this was purposefully designed to be dangerous.

20:21

There are other people that I highly respect, Norman Fenton, also from the United Kingdom.

20:26

He has very good statistics and analysis of excess deaths.

20:34

There are websites... Who was that second fellow, please?

20:38

Norman Fenton.

20:40

Thank you.

20:41

He also publishes on Substack with two other colleagues.

20:46

And another website is very interesting.

20:49

I early on collaborated with Craig Perry Cooper.

20:52

He's also a friend.

20:54

He set up a separate website where we were publishing information about adverse events and deaths recorded in VAERS system per manufacturing batch number.

21:05

And so that website is called How Bad is Your Batch?

21:10

howbad.info.

21:11

And it's very rich.

21:13

It's not very, you know, pretty.

21:14

It looks like Craigslist as far as the design.

21:17

But it's very, there's lots and lots of information and data from, again, from the very beginning of rollout of these injections.

21:26

And my work is there as well.

21:29

And we were the first ones who said, who pointed to the fact that the batches

21:34

had very different toxicity profiles, and which indicated again, at the minimum at the time, I saw that it was a breakdown of the manufacturing process and non compliance with good manufacturing practices.

21:46

And I was, you know, pointing this out and making presentations and speaking everywhere about it.

21:52

But now we know, we know definitively, this was also by design.

21:55

This was intentional and it was also confirmed by several colleagues, most recently from Denmark.

22:02

They actually even published a paper in Peer Review Journal confirming the same findings in Danish data from the government.

22:08

I just want to repeat those back if I could for people.

22:13

Michael Yeadon, Y-E-A-D-O-N, I believe, right?

22:17

Yes.

22:18

And does he have a substack?

22:20

He is on Telegram.

22:22

He doesn't publish on Stubstack, although he does comment on my publications.

22:29

But he has a Telegram channel with his colleague Robin Manotti.

22:34

And that one is very interesting.

22:36

They publish a lot of information about also geopolitics and climate hoax and all sorts of interesting issues.

22:43

Yep, anyone studying COVID knows Michael Yeadon and normanfenton.substack and howbadisyourbatch.com for folks to get informed, persuaded, and motivated to do something.

23:02

What are you

23:05

What are you focused on now in terms of continuing to study and bringing forth?

23:10

What's most urgent on your plate this week and next?

23:14

And, or what is the, if there is a single most effective tactic, strategy, or message you want to give to the world that could help us, what would you tell me?

23:33

Well, so the most important aspect right now is to help people recognize that the way the separation is run, especially in the United States, but also worldwide, is all of these crimes that they're committing,

23:52

And these are definitely crimes of murder, battery, psychological torture, theft.

24:02

All of these crimes are being committed legally.

24:07

So that's what people need to understand.

24:10

The most significant evidence of pre-planning and intent of this entire operation

24:16

is the fact that the laws in the US were put in place over decades preceding this to enable this operation to be conducted and everything that they are doing so far I haven't noticed

24:32

any significant violations of law that they've made, and this is by design.

24:37

They've developed these illegal laws, which Catherine Watt writes about, and when I found her publication, that kind of clicked in place for me, that starting from about 1980s, they have introduced this legal cage and the legal kill box,

24:56

and they build it step by step over decades.

25:00

It includes, first of all, it includes the idea of the public health emergency as a national emergency.

25:08

It didn't exist until the 80s.

25:09

It's not anticipated in our constitution.

25:12

It's not part of the constitution.

25:13

It's something the executive administrative state, deep state put in.

25:18

as the excuse to suspend the constitutional rule of law, which they have done effectively.

25:25

So that announcement of public health emergency based on no criteria whatsoever.

25:30

There's no hard data that needs to happen.

25:33

No demonstration of actual deaths or economic impact needs to exist for them to announce public health emergency as they did based on 40 cases in China and a few cruise ships.

25:45

Okay, so that that was their excuse to announce public health emergency, which suspends the, the, which actually consolidates all the power in the executive branch, and neuters legislative and judicial branch of the government.

25:59

And then from there, the public health emergency cannot stop until whoever announced it, which was HHS at this point, says so.

26:09

So we are still in a public health emergency based on HHS PrEP Act declarations, which people don't realize.

26:16

They think COVID is over, we don't have emergency anymore.

26:18

Not true.

26:19

It's been extended 11 times.

26:22

and it is now extended until December 31st, 2024.

26:25

So we're still in a public health emergency, except now they rewrote it to say, oh, COVID virus or any potential virus, any potential virus.

26:38

And that's why we have a public health emergency.

26:41

And then the second piece of this big legal kill box structure is the idea of these EUA countermeasures.

26:50

So what people think that being rolled out as vaccines and PCR tests and remdesivir and other therapeutics, they're not pharmaceutical or medical device products legally.

27:05

They do not have to comply with FDA regulations for, let's say, mislabeling, product adulteration, even putting poison into the product, known poison,

27:19

Even putting known transfectants into the product such as DNA plasmids which were found up to 30% contamination.

27:27

in Pfizer vials and Moderna vials.

27:30

All of that, and that all have been acknowledged by the regulators everywhere in here and in Europe and in Canada.

27:38

And regulators point blank telling us, yes, we know they're there, we're not removing the product.

27:43

You know why?

27:44

Because the EUA countermeasures under public health emergency do not have to comply with any law.

27:50

Sasha Latypova Podcast featuring Sasha Latypova Podcast featuring Sasha Latypova Podcast featuring Sasha Latypova Podcast featuring

28:08

and that doesn't have to comply with the IND or investigational research rules.

28:16

So all of that exists in the law.

28:18

So we have the laws that say that the government is allowed to do all of this and nobody can stop them.

28:26

So my point to the people today is somebody either a court or a legislative body needs to recognize

28:36

and take judicial notice of these laws and announce them wholesale illegal and dismantle them.

28:45

And that's the kind of the main focus of my work and Catherine's work right now.

28:49

And we're collaborating with several groups of legislators, legislators who have noticed and would like to do something about it.

28:59

And I think we need to have this momentum going and we need to have more legislators become aware more

29:06

courts become aware of this.

29:09

To make a court aware, somebody who is trying to sue Pfizer, for example, has to introduce this into their case, has to somehow build their case based on the idea that these laws are there.

29:23

Because what happens today, and I notice in majority of the cases who are trying to sue Pfizer, the plaintiffs go in and they say, oh, we were given experimental medicine and forced to take it and now we're injured.

29:35

Well, in U.S.

29:36

law, this is not an experimental medicine.

29:40

By law, it's not experimental.

29:41

It cannot be.

29:43

It's an emergency use countermeasure in the public health emergency.

29:46

And then the judges are throwing these cases out of court saying, no, it's not experimental.

29:51

You know what?

29:51

The judge is correct.

29:54

And then again, because the judges are following illegal laws and the cases are trying to

30:03

you know, sue Pfizer based on the wrong legal theory, what happens is, we're just solidifying injustice, we're just creating a whole bunch of case law that confirms that these illegal laws are actually valid.

30:19

So again, my point, somebody please notice these laws, these illegal laws, either in court or in legislators somewhere, and start dismantling them.

30:31

That is the rub, that is the bullseye, it sounds to me, that certainly every lawyer needs to be made aware of.

30:40

I would like to think that if every, maybe criminal lawyer, not every civil lawyer, but maybe every lawyer, if they comprehended what you just told me, and you're calling them illegal laws, are they illegal?

30:56

They're not, they're laws.

30:57

They're unconscionable.

31:00

They're unconscionable.

31:01

So the net effect of this construct is that we have mass murder.

31:11

Okay, so that makes them illegal laws.

31:14

and we can and I'm not a legal scholar so we can have a you know lots of debates around this but if some construct enables net result as as murder and and injury and harm yeah yeah yeah with knowledge of forethought should not exist to any sane person absolutely and I'd like to think more folks are saying than not if we could break the trance Americans are

31:41

Due Diligence

31:57

I have mercy for the folks who are hearing these kind of things for the first time.

32:04

I've been a reader of books all my life, so this hasn't surprised me when COVID emerged at this late stage in my life.

32:14

But for folks, I have a lot of mercy, but not enough to stop me from doing all I can to spread the word, because it couldn't be more urgent.

32:24

It couldn't be more diabolical.

32:28

It's intense, it's fantastic.

32:32

I remember years ago, brief little story, when I was researching things behind the scenes or how the world really works, you know, I was at a group of people and someone was giving a presentation on

32:49

how the Federal Reserve really serves private interests, it really does nothing for us, and that's putting it nicely.

32:55

And I asked a question to clarify, he said, yeah.

32:59

And I asked another one, he said, yeah, that's it, Bruce.

33:01

I said, you mean there's really a dragon to slay?

33:04

There's really a dragon to slay?

33:06

You know, we're in a really bad James Bond movie.

33:12

All of us, we really are.

33:14

We really, really are.

33:16

Yes, it is true.

33:19

The biggest challenge that we have today is compelling people to see the evil.

33:30

They don't want to.

33:31

They think that if they deny that it exists and they close their eyes,

33:35

and they pretend like, oh, everything's over and we just can go back to vacations and, you know, watching sports on TV.

33:44

That's, you know, I want to, you know, there's this urban legend, which nobody can verify anymore, of course.

33:54

The legend says that when Christopher Columbus arrived at the New World with his big ships and this amazing new technology,

34:02

the natives on the shore, most of them didn't see the ships, because in their frame of reference, nothing like this could exist.

34:10

They never had any anything in their life that would verify the existence of this.

34:15

And so they didn't, they literally didn't see them.

34:17

So there's this gigantic, you know, few ships landing, and they don't see them.

34:22

And, you know, and we know how things ended for them.

34:24

Right.

34:25

So that's my that's my message to everyone who is trying to hide their head in the sand.

34:32

Don't.

34:33

Because there's no way out of this by hiding, avoiding and pretending it doesn't exist.

34:38

You have to face it head on.

34:40

And then you have hope for overcoming it and slaying the dragon and surviving.

34:46

You remind me, like I've got a couple impulses in my head right now.

34:50

Wow, it's really hard if someone has a doctor in their family because they're going to believe the doctor in the family.

34:57

But I should rather think, let me talk to that doctor.

35:01

Well, let's get the eyeballs of more doctors on your sub stack and Catherine's and these other sources.

35:08

They have to be challenged.

35:11

Maybe more than most, I don't know.

35:14

Yes, exactly.

35:15

Because what this situation, what this crime is about, it's not about science.

35:20

Notice that all these debates about science that have been going on for three years.

35:24

And that's exactly what they want you to focus in this sort of debate that it's very hard to win.

35:31

and it's a distraction really.

35:34

What Catherine and I write about is not science, it's law and pharmaceutical regulations and how they're being completely subverted.

35:44

So doctors are not trained in law and they're not trained in pharmaceutical regulation either.

35:51

They only listen to pharmaceutical sales reps but they never look at actual, you know, how the regulation happens.

35:59

And we know, you and I know, that the journals have been co-opted.

36:03

The medical journals are co-opted to Brainwash, the tribes of doctors.

36:07

Sasha, let me reintroduce you.

36:09

Sasha Latypova, whose sub-stack is filled with the documentation of the things we've been discussing.

36:19

We shall return.

36:20

Here is important information from TNT Radio.

36:24

Give me a minute with TNT Radio's Steve Malzberg.

36:28

With Joe Biden behind in just about every presidential poll, the strategy of the left seems to be to go after Donald Trump even harder than they've been doing for the past eight years, if that's even possible.

36:38

And on the media side, Joe Scarborough, whose brother-in-law works in the Biden administration, seems to be leading the charge.

36:46

He Will Do, He Will Get Away With, He Will Imprison, He Will Execute whoever he's allowed to imprison, execute, drive from the country.

37:02

Just look at his past.

37:04

And as unhinged as that was, it's nothing compared to what New York Democrat Congressman Dan Golden said the other day.

37:11

It is just

37:12

a conversation for Due Diligence

37:27

Now after receiving some well-deserved criticism, Goldman apologized, said he didn't mean to use that word, eliminated, etc, etc.

37:34

This is all the left has left, so watch for more of the same.

37:40

Thanks for giving me a minute.

37:41

I'm Steve Allsberg.

37:42

Catch my show Monday to Friday, 9 p.m.

37:45

Eastern Time, right here on TNT Radio Vision.

37:49

My dad was a farmer.

37:52

The guy was bigger than life.

37:54

He wasn't someone that liked to show his emotion or like to show what he was struggling, but we all struggle.

38:01

I want to show emotion to my kids.

38:04

It's something that brings me so much joy, and I want them to see me working through things.

38:10

Allow your kids to know that it's okay to struggle, that even dad doesn't know the answer sometimes, but we're going to figure it out together.

38:18

Bruce DeTorres on today's News Talk, TNT Radio.

38:23

Sasha Latypova is educating me about her deep, incredible, horrifying, frightening, but important research into the legal kill box that has been erected over decades to facilitate the COVID agenda.

38:41

We were last talking, Sasha, about the importance of reaching out to doctors.

38:46

Did I interrupt a thought you were having about that?

38:50

Please tell me.

38:50

Yeah, I was just saying that, right, so the doctors are not trained in law and they don't understand pharmaceutical regulations either.

39:01

So this is the focus of my research and Catherine Watt's research is to uncover how the crime is being committed completely legally on paper,

39:12

and why it's been designed this way and why it's been designed to fool professionals such as doctors.

39:20

And would you, all right, so would you agree then, maybe you did, that if the top three or four types of Americans we could approach, who if they understood the truth, their influence would best leverage improvement?

39:38

Is it doctors?

39:39

And if so, who else?

39:41

Well, the doctors, yes.

39:45

You know, especially, you know, understanding how dangerous those COVID protocols and how they exactly designed to produce mass deaths and injuries, and how dangerous the shots are.

39:57

But I think people that we need to really reach are the parts of our legislative and judicial system that are still

40:09

left with people who still have conscience and people who still believe in the rule of law.

40:16

And I know I'm speaking about a small minority now, but I know they exist.

40:22

And so those are the people that we really do need to reach so that they can understand this and see the legal cage.

40:31

And once they see it, it's actually very easy to dismantle it.

40:36

You know, and there are so many times

40:39

In my years of muckraking, you know, corruption behind, you know, the military and the CIA and the assassinations and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

40:47

It gets mentioned.

40:49

There's only 435 members of Congress.

40:52

There's only a finite number in each of our state legislatures.

40:57

Instead of all the sports and other time-wasting things we do, if we had a lifelong habit of just a letter-writing campaign of harassment to these people, I say ejocularly, but I mean it, if more of us did even just that and then everything else, because what percentage of all the members of Congress

41:22

will

41:43

some that are intelligent and believing in higher principles and the rule of law.

41:50

What have been successful for me and my colleagues so far is actually going to local counties and for example in Idaho we have an amazing organizer

42:04

42:24

and same activity has gone on, I know, in parallel by different group of people, but we have been in touch in Florida and they also have been very successful in several counties and in the GOP, local county GOP group also signing on to these resolutions.

42:45

And while these resolutions are not lawmaking, it's just symbolic,

42:49

but they accumulate and then eventually that has to go into the state legislator.

42:56

And, you know, other legislators from other states are interested in also examining this, understanding, investigating.

43:05

We have been in touch with several.

43:07

There are several dialogues ongoing.

43:10

There is also effort to stop these injections, same injections being rolled out into animal vaccines, which is just horrific.

43:19

You know, they're now hastily trying to introduce mRNA shots.

43:24

for cattle, for example, which will basically do the same things that it's doing in people.

43:30

It will cause cancer, it will cause dysbiosis, it will destroy animals' microbiome.

43:37

I actually reviewed one of the vaccines that was approved by USDA.

43:41

It's manufactured by Merck and it's been approved for pigs.

43:44

And that vaccine actually kills about 30% of the herd within 21 days after vaccinations.

43:51

But USDA approved it.

43:56

Did they rescind it after those deaths?

43:59

Oh, no, no, no.

44:00

This is in the label.

44:01

It's part of the approval.

44:03

So the label on the USDA website on the last page has safety summary.

44:07

In the safety summary, we see that, you know, these piglets that were injected, 3% die right away.

44:14

And then another 27% have extremely severe adverse events.

44:19

They're inconsistent with life.

44:20

I'm pretty sure they got slaughtered after that.

44:23

They weren't sent to a piggy hospital.

44:25

So my question is, how is this approved on the label that this vaccine, you know, kills about 30% of your herd within 21 days?

44:37

And I'm sure on day 22, things didn't get much better.

44:40

It's just that the study was stopped.

44:43

So that's what we have to find.

44:48

And what might be known about the harm to people who eat such cattle or pork?

44:54

Exactly.

44:56

They can be harmed because these shots are just as contaminated with plasma DNA.

45:02

They're encapsulated lipid nanoparticle.

45:04

People are saying, oh, well, you know, it will disintegrate and be removed from cooking.

45:09

Not so much.

45:10

These are stable chemicals.

45:12

We don't know.

45:13

You need to do a study.

45:14

You can't just hand wave it away.

45:15

And yet that's what they're doing.

45:17

They're saying, oh, no, don't worry about it.

45:18

That's not going to happen.

45:20

And that's safety assessment.

45:23

You know?

45:25

Okay, while I recover from that, I'll just state a thought I pinned in my head.

45:32

Yeah, you described how so many representatives are groomed because they are corruptible, they'll go along with these heinous plans because

45:43

of their lust for money and power, which is why, obviously, I think we should write not just our personal representative in a district or anywhere, but all the representatives of our state and all the delegation from our state to try to find those who have a conscience and the ability to care and maybe do the right thing.

46:09

Not just our personal representatives, though, obviously them.

46:13

Sasha, talk to me if you can about the next thing that occurs to you or where you might steer me to.

46:25

Bruce, create your own effort in your county.

46:27

That's the answer to the question I was trying to develop, but are there resources or folks you would talk about or recommend along those lines for empowerment?

46:37

Right, so about the meetings with county officials, I actually also published on my sub stack the template letter and the actual letter that was signed by the Idaho counties.

46:49

Also the process step by step how to approach your county to set up a meeting like this, which Laura provided for me, which is very simple, but it's described and it has template language and the emails that you can send to them.

47:02

Due Diligence.

47:12

Yeah, so my colleagues and I, including Dr. Jensen Lindsay, Peter McCullough, Ryan Cole, who is from Idaho, and Kevin McKernan, and Renata Moon, she's a pediatrician.

47:28

So we, so Laura would organize a meeting with county, we show up on Zoom and do five minute testimony each.

47:35

And that was extremely effective.

47:37

So we can do that.

47:39

Zoom meetings.

47:39

Yeah.

47:40

Nowadays.

47:41

Yeah.

47:42

And drawing circles around that effort, it occurs to me to search, this is my homework to myself, to search for any and all legal or judicial or legislative watchdog groups in each of our own states and educate them, inform them, get them up to speed, get them on a Zoom, ask to meet them in their office, so that if they're in the business of trying to twist the arms of legislators, yeah, why not?

48:11

exactly exactly and now on zoom we can be very effective we can assemble a great group of experts both us and internationally and we can when we can do that yeah and walk them through a powerpoint and just you know give them something to think about and chew on and yes

48:35

How much time?

48:37

Well, I don't want to get personal.

48:38

I would, but you know, what of more driving substance about your effort and the information that's out there?

48:48

It's so easy to ask you, what's the most horrifying thing you've learned lately?

48:52

There, I said it.

48:55

Just fishing around for all I can get at you, Sasha, because you're a precious resource to me in this effort.

49:02

Well, I don't know about horrifying.

49:04

I mean, all of this was horrifying.

49:06

Yeah.

49:07

But the thing is, what people need to realize, the proper way to deal with any situation, no matter how difficult is to try to assess the reality as accurately as possible, as truthfully as possible.

49:26

And because if you're

49:29

mental model of what's going on is very close to objective reality, you're much more likely to develop a productive way forward, and also not get, you know, depressed and demoralized in the process.

49:45

And it kind of sounds counterproductive, because they say, what if my reality is super, super horrible, wouldn't that depress me?

49:54

No, but trust me, if you assess it accurately,

49:57

You are much more likely to look at it from a productive standpoint and come up with solutions, which will prevent you from being demoralized.

50:06

So that's my message to everyone.

50:09

No matter how horrifying what I'm saying, believe me, I am as horrified as you are.

50:14

It's just that I had more time to adjust to this and to figure out what I can do about it.

50:21

So, and I encourage everyone to try to learn as much as possible about the truth and try to figure out what you can do yourself or with friends to change the situation, to improve it, to get us closer to restoring our constitutional governance and the rule of law.

50:43

You answered a question I jotted on the break about strengthening people to look at the truth.

50:51

And you've equipped me and everybody with that encouragement.

50:59

I have a huge awareness of the challenge for too many Americans to have

51:13

dare I say, any self-confidence, any sense that they've got the power, the right and the authority to lead their lives, be the leader of their life, to affect things of importance.

51:32

We've been dumbed down for so many generations

51:37

you can anticipate, you know, the next half hour sermon I would give along those lines.

51:41

And with a heart filled with compassion, I'll add the suggestion to folks who might feel overwhelmed by these horrors, the importance of talking to yourself like a great mother and a great father.

52:00

And the model that works for me is a great mother

52:05

loves comforts soothes and restores and makes you feel safe there there everything's all right you're not alone i'll always be with you we'll get through this together

52:16

all that.

52:17

Okay, you know, calm down, Bruce.

52:21

And then a great father is the very, very encouraging, playful figure in my mental model.

52:28

Come on, we got a lot of work to do.

52:29

I don't know how to do it either.

52:31

We're going to make a big mess experimenting, figuring out how to build what we want or solve the problem we have.

52:36

And we're not going to finish it today.

52:38

And we'll go home and we'll tell stories all about it.

52:41

Due Diligence.

52:57

that's the crisis to me because there's just not enough I don't see enough humans with the ability to do that the folks who can do that work in corporations and work in the media and become doctors and lawyers and they're very very spry on air and things like this and they're very glib and they're very clever blah blah blah blah blah that's not enough we need all the folks who are suffering in despair who've never loved life enough to give a damn about it let alone do anything about it

53:24

to rally and it is with this love and compassion and encouragement I think.

53:30

Yeah, but that was also by design.

53:34

I mean, there are some really great authors on Substack, I was reading just this morning, describing also the history of mass demoralization, of removing the Christian principles from everywhere, from education, from day-to-day practice, even from the church.

53:58

uh for example and removing idea of adult agency that you can determine your own life that you can make this so now you know everything is about authority and and even I think even this whole campaign against bullying in schools is part of it

54:18

Well, you know, I'm not for bullying, but the whole idea that, you know, kids cannot resolve anything by themselves and always have to appeal to authority.

54:29

That's what it's being taught, right?

54:32

So you have to strike a balance between you don't want violence, you don't want

54:35

Due Diligence by Sasha Latypova Podcast featuring Sasha Latypova

54:54

Due Diligence

55:14

It's a full-spectrum effort, sashalatypova.substack.com.

55:19

Thank you so much, my friend, for coming back on such short notice.

55:23

I hope you had a great Thanksgiving.

55:25

I hope you have a great rest of your weekend.

55:28

And I hope we stay in touch.

55:29

And if I could ever help you with anything, ask me, let me know.

55:33

Sasha Latypova here on the awesome, incredible TNT Radio Vision.