Showing posts with label James Corbett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Corbett. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 18, 2024

Excellent interview of Graeme MacQueen by James Corbett covering Graeme’s book on the October 2001 anthrax attacks

Wow.  Ryan provides Graeme MacQueen's book, The 2001 Anthrax Deception: The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy, here at The International Center for 9/11 Justice

23:00. We often think of September 2001 as a crucial time.  I t was.  That's when the 9/11 attacks happened.  But October 2001 in a way is just as important.  That's when the bombing in Afghanistan begins.  That's when very overt preparation begins for attacking Iraq.  That's when the PATRIOT Act is passed.  That's when the NSA as we know now begins mass spying on US citizens. That's when the anthrax attacks happen.  So as you said earlier, it's not just a matter of September, these events were drawn out over the fall.  That's the leading hypothesis up until the PATRIOT Act that was signed into law on the 26th of October. And George Bush when he gives his little speech justifying the PATRIOT Act on that day, he refers to 9/11 and he refers to the anthrax attack and his speech assumes that they were done by the same group or at least related group with extremists.  But rapidly after the Patriot Act is passed the narrative begins to crumble and one of the reasons it begins to crumble is because of hard science on those who look at the spores it seems clear that some of the people who examined the anthrax spores had not been fully brought into this fraud.  They're saying, you know, I'm sorry but this looks like an American product.  This looks like it comes from our own domestic programs, not just American but from US military and intelligence, and that really quite rapidly becomes accepted for very specific reasons.  By the end of the year, by the end of December 2001, all the frauds meant to frame Al-Qaeda and Iraq have crumbled.  There is a group that continues to kind of revive those theories from time to time over the next year but the main consensus, and that includes the FBI, it includes Homeland Security, it includes the White House, is that somehow this has come from within our own biological weapons program, and at that point the FBI goes into damage control mode and tries to create these narratives of a lone nut somehow and eccentric, dangerous, possibly mentally unbalanced individual in our system had done these attacks.  And if that's true, of course, it tells us really nothing. 

27:35  Apparently there was a 2005 civil case filed by the family of Robert Stevens, 62, died on October 5, 2001, the first victim of the anthrax attacks, and that case actually provoked the Department of Justice to issue a summary for a motion of judgment, wanting to dismiss the case.  

[A summary judgment is when a civil court rules in favor of one party over the other without a full trial.  When a party files for a summary judgment, they are then referred to as the "Moving Party."  Two requirements: first, the parties to the lawsuit have to agree to the material facts, the facts that are important to the legal decision.  Second, the law must say these undisputed facts entitle the "Moving Party" to a judgment.  The evidence must be admissible.  The judge can only look at what is allowed by the evidence code.  Your testimony and that of a key witness are down on paper.  The witness has to sign the evidence on paper in front of a notary, called an affidavit.  Both you and your opponent can bring affidavits.  Written arguments are called Memorandum.] 

 

Tuesday, September 10, 2024

John Miller of ABC News says that "America was not the target of the "Dancing Israelis

The photos and videos [of the five Israelis] celebrating the attack were destroyed by the US Gov't and the five Israelis were deported back to Israel.  --KimDotCom
Greg Reese did a decent report on the 9/11 "Dancing Israelis" 

James Corbett does a remarkable and thorough job.  Be your own investigator. 

Men with documented connections 

Ah, yes, John Miller of ABC News says that "America was not the target of the "Dancing Israelis," no.  Their target?  Muslims.  You should know better, American citizen.  And thanks to the stellar reporting of John Miller, we can all be deceived rest easy about who was the real target on the day of the 9/11 Twin Tower attack.  

The John Miller moment occurs at the 8:00 mark.  

KimDotCom asks, 
Israel knew about 9/11 in advance?  Before the planes hit the Twin Towers, Israeli spies were positioned to "document the event." 

And here's the kicker, 

The photos and videos celebrating the attack were destroyed by the US Gov't and the five Israelis were deported back to Israel.  

Israel knew about 9/11 in advance? Before the planes hit the Twin Towers Israeli spies were positioned to “document the event”. The photos and videos celebrating the attack were destroyed by the US Govt and the five Israelis were deported back to Israel. pic.twitter.com/RnTN6JJPjV

Monday, August 26, 2024

GREAT BRITAIN: King Charles grants his royal consent to a new Law which allows UK food to contain gene edited foods & remain unlabelled

Clothes don't make the man, honor does.  So the phrase, "the emperor has no clothes" has so little meaning except from an illiterate lefty.  King Charles has no power and no standing.

Friday, June 21, 2024

JENNY MCCARTHY: Do we need the hepatitis B shot in the second day of life?

Tuesday, June 11, 2024

Remember Donald Rumsfeld's press conference on 9/10/2001, where he announces the missing $2.3 trillion? As of today, there are $21 trillion, $20 trillion between 1998 and 2015 missing from DoD

As of today, there are $21 trillion, $20 trillion between 1998 and 2015 missing from DoD, and $1 trillion from HUD.  Coming into 9/11, we had been working with a reporter in Washington who was writing story after story about the missing money, and we had a huge spread out in "Insight Magazine," the cover story going to all the Congressional and Senate offices talking about what was then $3.3 trillion missing and demanding accountability, including who were the private corporations and banks running all those payment systems.  That Monday, the day before 9/11, Donald Rumsfeld gave a press conference at the DoD and he announced that the DoD was missing $2.3 trillion.  The next day, 9/11 happened.  James Corbett has a wonderful video called "9/11 Trillions: Follow the Money," where he describes how many of the offices that were blown up at the Pentagon and the World Trade Center related to securities and other financial operations very much connected to the money was disappearing.  In fact, we were told that the office at the Pentagon that was blown up, or one of the offices, was the location for the Offices of Naval Intelligences Research Group investigating the missing money.  And so the rest is history.  The PATRIOT Act had passed and then the DoD got huge appropriations and nobody really cared about the missing money.  What we've seen since 9/11 is the amount of money related to undocumentable adjustments, the black budgets and secret books have exploded.  One thing to understand is that it's not just money spent by government.  An increasing percentage of that money is spent by private corporations and banks that are publicly traded on the stock market and are running highly secret and classified governmental operations.  And so, you've got a direct connection or spigot between secret money and people making money in the stock market, and, of course, capital gains in the market in the real estate market, Polly, is the biggest source of capital gains.  

This was interesting: a missing money chronology.


Check out James Corbett's Show Notes for Episode 308, "9/11 Trillions: Follow the Money," dated September 11, 2015.

Saturday, February 17, 2024

TIMOTHY MCVEIGH: the execution went ahead on June 11th, 2001. In a highly unusual and secret agreement, no autopsy was performed. One witness said he was still breathing. The prison officials admitted his hearse was a decoy.

On the morning of April 19th, 1995, a decorated Gulf War combat vet blew up the Federal Building in Oklahoma City using a truck bomb that he didn't build and a Ryder truck that he didn't rent with the help of a passenger who didn't exist.  Having just gotten away with the largest act of terrorism on U.S. soil to date, the Fort Bragg trained, Special Forces sheep drip dropout blended in with the crowd by making his getaway in a car without a license plate and was immediately pulled over. The ATF was the supposed a target of the attack, but luckily all of their agents were out of the office that morning.  Later that day, the President boldly declared "We will find the people who did this.  When we do, justice will be swift, certain, and severe," except for 

"John Doe #2, who according to the FBI, never existed.  In McVeigh's unprecedented three and a half week trial, the prosecution didn't show the CCTV footage of him, and John Doe #2 parking Ryder truck.  Didn't explain why 24 separate witnesses mass hallucinated the existence of John Doe #2, didn't explain why the government was testing truck bombs and the Army was storing Ryder trucks at Camp Gruber right before the bombing, and didn't talk to the FBI informants who blew the whistle on the plot.  But they did collaborate with the CIA and they did convict McVeigh as the lone wolf bomber and Terry Nichols as his bomb constructing accomplice.  Still, a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists, including 300 bombing victims, insist on talking about facts and evidence and refuse to simply believe what they're told a million times by people who tailored suits with well quaffed hair.  They quote the US Army Brigadier General and the FBI crime lab whistleblower and the inventor of the neutron bomb who point out the physical impossibility that the Ryder truck bomb did the damage to the Murrah Building, but that doesn't matter because if there were other bombs in the building that day we would have heard about them:  

"The second explosive was found and defused."  

"I think he said another bomb . . . ."

"The Justice Department is reporting a second explosive device has been found."

"They then found a third device which was also larger than the first."

"And I see another bomb truck going so apparently apparently they're going to try and get out that third bomb."

The FBI claims to have lost the footage showing McVeigh and John Doe #2 parking the truck in front of the Murrah building that morning, but that's understandable because the Bureau has a lot of important evidence to store.

2:15. Terry Nichols insists that the FBI was involved in the plot but thankfully a judge has saved us the trouble of listening to him by preventing lawyers from deposing him.

2:22. Bomb squad truck parked across the street 2 hours before the blast, but that just shows the authorities were prepared for anything.  

2:27. Of the documents obtained by 20/20 show that someone called the Executive Secretariat's Office at the Justice Department in Washington and said "The Murrah Building had been bombed," but this was 24 minutes before the blast." But that shows the public was unusually vigilant that morning.  

2:45. Also, apparently before the bombing, Governor Frank Keating's brother, Martin Keating, had been working on a novel [S.A.S.S.Y.: Based on a True Story that Hasn't Happened.  Yet., Martin Keating, 1996] about a terrorist bombing in Oklahoma City.  Stranger still, one of the characters in the novel was named Thomas McVeigh." 

But that's probably just a coincidence.

In politics, nothing happens by accident.  If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.  -- Franklin D Roosevelt 

McVeigh wrote a letter to his sister where he admitted to being a secret Special Forces Operative and he complained to his friends about the pain in the ass from an Army-implanted microchip.  But that's crazy because if he didn't actually leave the Army in 1991, there would be proof of that.  VIDEO shows McVeigh inside a tank at Camp Grafton in North Dakota in August 1993, two years after his supposed exit from the Army in 1991. 

3:15. McVeigh was not executed on May 16th, 2001 as scheduled because "the FBI had failed to turn over thousands of pages of evidence to McVeigh's defense attorneys."  But the execution went ahead on June 11th, 2001.  In a highly unusual and secret agreement, no autopsy was performed.  One witness said he was still breathing.  The prison officials admitted his hearse was a decoy.  Then the case was officially closed.  

If you question any part of the story you are a paranoid wingnut, birther, truther, 10ther, prepper, or conspiracy loon who'd bring up any of these points ever again.

Learn more on Timothy McVeigh from the Corbett Report

Sunday, December 17, 2023

Rosa Koire on UN Agenda 2021

Find the link to the show and its resources @ the Corbett Report.

The gist of Agenda 21: 

1976, Habitat I and Habitat II determined that land, privately owned land, is actually a threat to the equity, social equity of people on the planet, 

Additional gist of Agenda 21, 

says that the rights of the individual need to be balanced with the rights of the community, and if you're an American, or in many free countries, the individual's rights are guaranteed, individual rights are guaranteed to us by [the] constitution.  

but if you balance the rights of the individual with the rights of the community, those community rights are not delineated, they can change at any time depending on who the ruler or the government is, and they always have greater weight than the weight of the individual. 

This is a dated interview, 2012, but if you want to know in detail the power, intent, and scope of UN Agendas 2021 and 2030 and beyond, Rosa Koire is the one to listen to. 

The remarks about individual rights conflicting with community rights and how communitarianism was formed by the UN from that struggle were interesting.  See the 11:20 mark.  

4:14. Well I am a professional appraiser, a commercial appraiser.  I was a district branch chief for the California Department of Transportation for about 30 years and an expert witness testifying in land use and land value.  And about 10 or so years ago, I found it was pretty difficult to determine what property was worth because people were being restricted and what they could do with their property Special appraiser I was a district branch chief for the California Department of Transportation for about 30 years and an expert witness testifying in land use and land value and about 10 or so years ago I found that it was pretty difficult to determine what property was worth because people were being restricted and what they could do with their property.  And around that same time, I was elected to an oversight committee on a Redevelopment project, a huge project and I researched it and found that it was fraudulent.  So, we sued to stop that.  And while doing research to find out what was behind that Redevelopment project, I found United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development. 

5:03.  Let's talk about your book and how that came together in the type of research that you've done over the preceding years into this agenda.

5:11. The book is I wrote the book because I am traveling all over the United States and I just simply wasn't able to go everywhere and I have the information and was able to put it together in a way that's very clear and understandable and it's a quick short read and in that way I was able to reach a lot more people because United Nations Agenda 21 sustainable development is a global plan but implemented locally so this is really important because it doesn't come called "Agenda 21," so you have to know what it looks like in your town to be able to recognize it.

5:53. Every time we have someone on to talk about Agenda 21 has their own way of summing up what that is and how it's unfolding so what's your take on what is United Nations Agenda 21?  

6:04. Agenda 21 is the Action Plan.  It's the blueprint to inventory and control all land, all water, all plants, all minerals, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all information, all energy, all education, and all human beings in the world.  That's it it's totally comprehensive.

6:28. It's so comprehensive it goes into many different aspects of everyone's everyday life that it's staggering to think that so few people have even heard of this Agenda 21 let alone know what it is and how can it function so that it maintains that level of secrecy while being completely out in the open? 

6:48. Yeah it's brilliant.  It's a stealth plan, and it's operating in plain sight.  And that is because it's called by so many different names.  You'll see it in your town as a regional plan generally, such as "One Bay Area," "Vision 2025" or "Our Future 2050," or something like that because what it is the plan was signed on to it was a United Nations agreement signed on to in 1992 by our President George H.W. Bush along with 178 international leaders.  And you're going to hear that it's an old, dusty plan, that it's not binding, that it has no impact on you.  That's a lie.  The truth is that it was brought back to the United States through the President's Council on Sustainable Development back in 1993 and all federal agencies changed their policies to conform with United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development.

7:50. That's right.  Let's go back to some of the beginnings of this, because as you indicate it was for scientists in agreement in 1992 at the Rio Earth Summit, but it has its roots in policies that go back at least . . . let's talk a little bit about the history of these ideas of Sustainable Development and how they came together.

8:09. Yeah, it's great.  It's the kind of thing that you ask yourself, how could I be against sustainability?  Just sounds so great.  I mean who wants to be unsustainable?  And, of course, the term "Sustainable Development" is a term that comes right out of the United Nations, 1987, the Brundtland Commission from the World Commission on Environment and Development, and they wrote a book called Our Common Future, and in that the book the term "sustainable development" was first coined and formally given a definition,  and that is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations, 2030.  Sounds great, right?  But this has its roots and prior meetings of the United Nations in 1972 and then again in 1976, Habitat I and Habitat II, determined that land privately owned land is actually a threat to the equity, social equity of people on the planet, and this is a very vital part of the United Nations Agenda 21 because it actually is an attack on private property ownership.  Also, you have to remember that we, ourselves, are our own most important private property, and this plan actually enables domestic surveillance, the National Defense Authorization Act, drones, and control of all of our activities on the planet.

9:45. I think there must be a variety of reasons why this is being pushed by the people that it is, but I guess if there is a guiding ideology behind this, I've heard it cited before that communitarianism might be that ideology provides the framework for this that provides the framework for this agenda.  So what is communitarianism, and how does that play into this agenda?

10:04. Communitarianism says that it's an ideology, it's a political and social philosophy, that says that the rights of the individual need to be balanced with the rights of the community, and if you're an American, or in many free countries, the individual's rights are guaranteed, individual rights are guaranteed to us by [the] constitution cannot be taken away by any government .  We are born with them, right, but if you balance the rights of the individual with the rights of the community, those community rights are not delineated, they can change at any time depending on who the ruler or the government is, and they always have greater weight than the weight of the individual.  That means that you're always going to see that the individual rights are a threat to the community in which case we're talking about the global community.

11:06. That's right it does kind of flip the idea of Rights on its head the rights that are enshrined in the Bill of Rights or even in the ones they pay lip service to in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are all guarantees of individual rights and liberties but some now we're expected to take on board the idea that there are communal rights that somehow supersede those of the individual so where does this idea come from and who are the types of people who are pushing this?

11:34. Well this is an ideology you can go back to the Fabian socialists.  In the 1800s if you want to if you're interested in doing that you know sort of a theoretical search on the development of this plan but I think it goes back further I mean obviously it goes back to any ideology that institutes a dictatorship or oligarchy.  But in our case you know because we are a free nation used to have the trappings of socially acceptable philosophy and that's where communitarianism comes in what we're talking about here are the three E's: Environment, Economy and Equity, social Equity you know like when you see those three circles, the image of United Nations Agenda 21, or Sustainability.


Several visual representations of sustainability and its three dimensions: the left image shows sustainability as three intersecting circles. In the top right it is a nested approach. In the bottom right it is three pillars.[1] The schematic with the nested ellipses emphasizes a hierarchy of the dimensions, putting  environment as the foundation for the other two.

Logos are always more symbolism than than substance.  They serve as ID badges so you can track lineage from one period of an organization to another. 

12:20. It looks like a Venn diagram where __________? of economy, ecology and social equity come together, that's sustainable development.  But Equity is a vital part of this because this is the illusion where you're going to have a balanced world where everybody is going to have . . . no one is going to gave too much, you know, the super wealthy 1% is going to go away and the poor will all have plenty of food and water and everything else they need.  But the concept, the overarching concept, that's the green mask as I call it one of the reasons why I call my book, Behind the Green Mask because, in fact, what this does is that it enables total takeover of our resources, both natural and [man-made], by those who want to totally control the earth.

13:17.  Well let's talk about some of those people who want to totally control the Earth and people who have been instrumental in this agenda of course people like Maurice strong or instrumental in the 1992 Rio Earth Summit who are some of the figures who have been spearheading this Agenda 21?  

13:36. Obviously, we are going to have the ultra wealthy, through hereditary ownership of property own a huge amount of the world, the ruling royalty classes, particularly the English own a huge amount of world;  the Catholic Church owns a tremendous amount of the world, the Vatican

Tuesday, October 10, 2023

G K Chesterton, Arthur Conan Doyle, and James Masefield wrote for the New World Order of 1918

Thank you to Inversionism.

The WWI Conspiracy,  2018, is an excellent documentary by James Corbett.  Above is the documentary in its entirety, but James does break up the 2-hour & 20-minute documentary into 3 parts for easier viewing. 

121:32. At the outbreak of war, they set up the War Propaganda Bureau at Wellington House.  The bureau's initial purpose was to persuade America to enter the war, but that meant they'd soon expand it to shape and mold public opinion in favor of the war effort end of the government itself.  On September 2nd, 1914, the head of the war propaganda Bureau invited 25 of Britain's most influential authors to a top-secret meeting.  Among those present at the meeting were G. K. Chesterton, Ford Maddox Ford, Thomas Hardy, Rudyard Kipling, Arthur Conan Doyle, Arnold Bennett, and HG Wells.  Not revealed until decades after the war ended, many of those present agreed to write propaganda material promoting the government's position on the war which the government would get commercial printing houses, including Oxford University Press to publish as seemingly independent works.  Under this secret agreement, Arthur Conan Doyle wrote To Arms!, 1914.  John Masefield wrote Gallipoli, 1916, and The Old Front Line, 1917.  Mary Humphrey Ward wrote The War on All Fronts:  England's Effort: Six Letters to an American Friend, 1916, and Towards the Goal, 1917.  Rudyard Kipling wrote The New Army in Training, 1915.  GK Chesterton wrote The Barbarism of Berlin, 1914.  In total the bureau published over 1,160 pamphlets over the course of the

Hillaire Belloc later rationalized his work in service of the government,

It is sometimes necessary to lie damnably in the interests of the nation. 

War correspondent William Beach Thomas was not so successful in the battle against his own conscience, 

I was thoroughly and deeply ashamed of what I had written for the good reason that it was untrue . . . [T]he vulgarity of enormous headlines and the enormity of one's own name did not lessen the shame.

But the Bureau's efforts were not confined to the literary world. Film, visual art, recruitment posters; no medium for swaying the hearts and minds of the public was overlooked. By 1918, the government's efforts to shape perception of the war—now officially centralized under a "Minister of Information," Lord Beaverbrook—was the most finely tuned purveyor of propaganda the world had yet seen. Even foreign propaganda, like the infamous Uncle Sam that went beyond a recruitment poster to become a staple of American government iconography, was based on a British propaganda poster featuring Lord Kitchener.

Control of the economy. Control of populations. Control of territory. Control of information. World War One was a boon for all of those who wanted to consolidate control of the many in the hands of the few. This was the vision that united all those participants in the conspiracies that led to the war itself. Beyond Cecil Rhodes and his secret society, there was a broader vision of global control for the would-be rulers of society who were seeking what tyrants had lusted after since the dawn of civilization: control of the world.

World War One was merely the first salvo in this clique's attempt to create not a reordering of this society or that economy, but a New World Order.

Saturday, September 17, 2022

9/11 and False Flags: The Secret History of Al Qaeda


Thanks to James Corbett @ The Corbett Report.  

Remember the chronology of terror: 

1983, Bombing of U.S. Marine Barracks in Beirut.  See here and here.  

1993, World Trade Center, NYC.

1995, Oklahoma City Bombing. 



2000, Bombing of the USS Cole.  The media called it a terrorist bombing, but isn't the Cole a battleship?  Wikipedia explains that the USS Cole
is an Arleigh Burke-class Aegis-equipped guided missile destroyer home-ported in Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia. 
As a destroyer then, wouldn't that make the attack an act of war?  Why would the media continue to gas Americans that we are not at war, a war that we were secretly creating?

2001, Twin Towers in NYC along with Tower 7.  

I'm sure I am missing a few.