AMERICA: Has only 4.5% of the world's population, but 25% of all the world's COVID-19 deaths. How did that happen?

Thanks to Walter Riley @ Lew Rockwell.

Remdesivir

In May 2020, when Fauci and the NIH put out their mandates for treating hospitalized patients, I knew that based on the drug they assigned hospitals to use in their protocols to treat COVID patients, Remdesivir, would turn out to be Fauci's genocide. 

3:50  It was going to be how Antony Fauci was going to kill hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of Americans in hospitals treated around the country and I have not gotten off of this ever since.  

The truth is that in the memo when Fauci stated was that there was one drug and one drug only that "was found to be effective and a viral trial against Ebola virus a years earlier.  And this experimental, anti-viral drug, called Remdesivir, that at that time had never been FDA approved, he said it was proven safe and effective against the Ebola virus and that now we were going to use it in America as the only treatment for all hospitalized, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 infected people.  

And so I had never heard of Remdesivir, but I had selected the actual hyperlink on NIH.gov's website, the National Institutes of Health, and this is important for . . . you mentioned you have audiences all around the country--it really doesn't matter how big your audience is or how small it is or where it is.  It doesn't matter if there is only 1 person in that audience, they all have loved ones and family members--they all need to be warned of this same message, so I was going to take on and have been ever since, to take on any audience no matter how big their platform is to warn as many people as possible of the ill-advised protocols that were going to do more harm and cause more death than the SARS-CoV-2 infection by itself, and that still stands true a year and a half later.  

On the May 1st, 2020 memo, Fauci claimed that the Remdesivir, on the Ebola trial, proved it to be safe and effective against the Ebola virus, this drug called Remdesivir. So I clicked the link to read the study, which I've read studies for the last 20 years being in practice, only to find out that not only was the drug not found to be safe, it definitely was not found to be effective.  It was the least effective and had the highest death rate of the 4 experimental drugs that were in that trial.  

5:50  So halfway through this trial with the Ebola patients in Africa, the Safety Independent Board found that Remdesivir had a mortality rate of 53.1%.  In fact, it was the only drug that had a death rate of over half of everyone they gave it to.  So the drug was found to be so dangerous that the Independent Board in August 2019 pulled Remdesivir from the study and said "No other Africans could get this drug.  It wasn't safe or effective against the Ebola virus." It was only proven to be the most deadly.  Then I knew Antony Fauci was lying in his memo that he sent out to all hospitals that this was the only drug that you're going to use.  Don't use anything else, like Hydroxychloroquine in the memo.  He goes on to state in that memo that Hydroxychloroquine was proven in COVID-19 patients to cause heart attacks and deaths, so it's not approved for COVID-19.  And I just thought that was odd because Hydroxychloroquine has been approved for 70 years, safe and effective over the world, over-the-counter safe for most of the world.  So I knew something was wrong with that, but I didn't care about that as much as I wanted to know more about Remdesevir.  

7:00  So I learned very quickly in the New England Journal of Medicine from the Ebola virus trial that Anthony Fauci LIED.  Remdesivir was not safe and effective against the Ebola Virus, so then I wanted to know what else he was lying about, so I clicked the 2nd study that he was referencing and this was called a cohort study, totally funded and carried out by Gilead, which owns Remdesivir's patent.  And in March 2020, Gilead decided to treat 53 people from Japan, Canada, and America that were COVID-19 positive.  And they gave them the Remdesivir drug for 10 days.  And this is significant because the Ebola trial was published in December 2019.  Just 3 months later, in March 2020, Gilead is going to give Remdesivir to a new trial COVID group with 53 people.  In the Ebola trial, they gave Remdesivir for 28 days and the other drugs.  And at 28 days, Remdesivir was found to be the deadliest of the 4 experimental drugs.  So now 3 months after that Ebola trial is wrapped up and is finished, in March 2020, Gilead is like let's just give these COVID-19 patients, 53 of them, 10 days of Remdesivir, and see what happens.  And their actual conclusions were 23% of all 53 people they gave the drug to, Remdesivir for 10 days, 23% of them had acute kidney failure, liver failure, multiple organ failure, 8% had to be taken off the drug by Day 10 because they had such severe liver failure or kidney failure; they needed kidney transplants, they were doing to die.  That's 31% of everybody they put that drug on in that 53-person trial.  Now he lied about the efficacy of the Ebola trial.  Now I know this drug is super dangerous and causes acute kidney failure in 30% of everyone you give that drug to.  And then 2 months later, on May 1, 2020, Anthony Fauci is saying that this is the one proven drug, safe and effective for all Americans, and I knew he was lying, and I knew he was setting up a hospital protocol with a very dangerous drug, called Remdesivir, not proven safe or effective.  And that this one drug was going to be the cause of most deaths from supposedly COVID-19, that they would call COVID-19 deaths in hospitals, when in fact it was death by Remdesivir poisoning.  Remdesivir causes acute kidney failure in 30% of everybody you give it to within 5 days.  What happens then when you have someone on an IV bag, you continue to fill their body with water, their kidneys are diseased and shut down, they can't excrete water from the body in the form of urine.  So your bowels retain the water, then water goes and surrounds your heart, and then it floods into your lungs and you're drowning these people to death, and in every hospital in America, they're drowning your loved ones to death by shutting down their kidneys, flooding their lungs with water, and you're calling it Secondary COVID Pneumonia, and it is not.  And since May 2020, I've been telling every loved one of anyone in the hospital from here on out--you need to make sure the hospital does a sputum test to determine if it's really bacterial or viral pneumonia they're saying that your loved one has and if they're saying it's not hospital protocol, you know they're lying to you about the pneumonia.  That IS hospital protocol.  It's the only way you define if it's viral or bacterial pneumonia.  There's no other way: an X-Ray is not definitive for pneumonia.  But that's all they're doing, so they're getting away with lying to you, when in fact, they have pulmonary edema.  They flooded your loved one's lungs with water with a drug proven to shut down your kidneys.  

10:35  Just so you know, I have been in the media non-stop ever since. And I've been telling people to avoid hospitals at all costs.  Stay home. 

Let's use some common sense here.  How many people around the world, Sir, have been infected with COVID-19, and what is the death rate from that infection?   

I don't have the exact number.

ARDIS:  It's less than 1% of the entire world.  But the mortality rate, the death rate of Remdesivir in the Ebola trial when they gave that drug, 53% of all people died on that drug.  Why would you select a drug that had a higher mortality rate than the infection you decided to treat.  Let me tell you right now that Anthony Fauci in May 2020, asked our federal government to buy up all the reserves of Remdesivir from Gilead, and then asked our federal government not to share Remdesivir with another country until the end of 2020.  

Do you want to know why at the end of 2020 America had 550,000 dead Americans and no other country was even close to that death total?  Because we were the only country that had the majority of 95% of their COVID patients/victims they died in hospitals, in ICUs, and in those ICU's they were only treating them with Remdesivir.  No other country was doing.  They were poisoning all Americans with this drug, convincing all of Americans that it's a deadly COVID infection, and it never was.  It was a deadly poison drug in hospitals that they were using to kill you.  And then they needed that narrative that [COVID] was deadly because they needed to sell you on the coming vaccines as a savior.  And they needed the American population to buy into it.  At the end of 2020, we had 550,000 dead.  We only have 4.5% of the world's population.  95% of humans live outside the U.S.  But at the end of 2020, the entire world, 7 billion-plus people have had COVID-19 go in and out of them.  And American which has 4.5% of the world's population, had 25% of all dead COVID-19 people in the world.  How is that possible?  How did we have 25% of all COVID-19 deaths?  We only have 4% of the entire world's population.  I thought this thing was super deadly around the whole world.  The only thing that was different was that America was using Remdesivir to poison people in hospitals.  They never died from COVID-19.  They died from kidney failure, liver failure, secondary lung, pulmonary edema.  And when your lungs fill with water, they have to put you on a vent to force air into your lungs and they're just drowning your loved ones to death and that's what they've been doing.  13:27

Snake venom toxin in the spike protein? Nicotine blocks spike from lodging in nAChReceptors

It was from Dr. Bryan Ardis where I'd first learned about Remdesivir, about a hospital advocate, and about how the spike proteins behaved like parasites and that people should be on anti-parasitics.  So I've loved his research abilities, his activism, and his network of professionals like Thomas Renz, Leigh Dundas, and others.  I've relied on other doctors, too, but Ardis' tenacity is inspiring.     

There were four sections of this interview that I found compelling.  

12:00  mm   

14:55  January 21st of this year, just two months ago, the FDA decided to authorize Remdesivir as the only drug to be used on newborns [newborns with COVID?] in this country.  The screenshot at 15:14 of "FDA Approves Veklury [Remdesivir] for the Treatment of Non-Hospitalized Patients at High Risk for COVID-19 Disease Progression" comes directly from a press release found at Gilead's website.  "I can't even fathom the men or women in charge who would actually do that.  So now it's been moved out of hospitals into in and out-patient care for children as the only treatment for as young as newborns, seven-pounds heavy, through the 18-year pediatric age range.  It's the only authorized drug.  There is nothing else that they're allowing for COVID-19 treatment.  I find that incredibly evil.  

#coincidence https://t.co/BxOKFYABkF

— Jennifer Depew, RD (@deNutrients) April 13, 2022

Also, now they've canceled monoclonal antibody uses throughout the United States and all U.S. territories for COVID-19 early treatment, and they're moving Remdesivir to the fusion centers where they were using monoclonal antibodies as the only IV infusion drug allowed. At the 15:55 mark, the screenshot contains the Forbes headline, "U.S. Pauses Distribution of Monoclonal Antibody Treatments that Proved Ineffective Against Omicron," Zachary Snowdon Smith, December 23, 2021. I have been moved with one singular purpose since May of 2020 when I read Anthony Fauci's memo about Remdesivir, I felt this spark inside of me that I now had to go voice to the world a warning to try to protect as many as possible innocent lives from being killed.  

16:40  It all started with a text.  There's a medical doctor that I admire and love that has had since the beginning of COVID the ability to project information

29:10  People are buying snake venom and mixing it with the same preparation as what is listed on the fact sheet of Velkury.  His screenshot does not provide a source.  Okay, what's his point?  To take Cobra venom, or any other kind of venom, and inject it into horses to create monoclonal antibodies.  When you read the EUA for Remdesivir, it states from January 21, that every practitioner who administers this to a COVID patient pediatric or not, you have to evaluate for thrombin time.  

29:36.  If it increases the prothrombin time, it means it's taking your blood's ability to coagulate and making it longer.  So it thins your blood; you can't clot.  You will internally bleed to death.  With Remdesivir it is stated on the Emergency Use Authorization, that every patient has to have its Prothrombin Time before you give Remdesivir and during treatment.  Do you know what King Cobra venom does to the blood?  

It makes it so that it can't clot. 

It makes it so that it can't clot.  Do you know what the other emphasis is?  It's prothrombin time.  And if you look at the CDC and NIH's websites, it actually says it increases prothrombin time, which is exactly what King Cobra venom does to the human body.  And Remdesivir is a lyophilized peptide-protein from King Cobra venom.  The University of Arizona published last summer a paper when they actually evaluated the blood samples and tissues of people who died, hundreds of them, from two different hospitals after being treated for COVID which means they got what drug--Remdesivir.  When they evaluated their blood, the title of their published article is "Like Venom Coursing the Through the Body: Researchers Identify Mechanism Driving COVID-19 Mortality," Rosemary Brandt, College of Agriculture and Life Science, August 24, 2021.

32:55  And then they take you through all of the elevated enzymes from the blood samples of these people that are naturally found in rattlesnake venom and viper venom that are at levels they've never seen before.  Do you want to know how they got there?  5-10 days of Remdesivir.  They've known since 2005 that if you inject a mouse with Cobra venom, like they're doing with Remdesivir injecting it into your veins, . . . [citing this article, "Histopathological Alterations Induced by Naja naja Crude Venom on Renal, Pulmonary and Intestinal Tissues of Mice Model, Md. Abdulla Al Mamun, et al., 2015. Here are Histological Changes] it actually causes a cytokine storm in all of the animals.  I am convinced that COVID-19 is not a respiratory virus of any kind.  It is actually venom poisoning.  It is actually, I believed, synthesized peptides and proteins from venoms of snakes, and they're administering them and targeting them to certain people.  The amazing thing about these 19 toxins found in Cobra venom is they're specifically sequenced to target specific organs, like the pancreas in a diabetic, like the heart in a heart-diseased patient, like the liver in a Hepatitis patient.  

33:55  So if I die because I am . . .  And then use mRNA technology that they've been isolating from snake venom for years that they knew were unusually stable, more stable than any other mRNA they've isolated from natural organisms for decades.  In 2015, they took mRNA from Cobra venom, krait venom they wrapped the mRNA in nanoparticle hydrogel "Nanofibrous Snake Venom Hemostat," ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2015;1(12):1300-1305.  DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00356. Epub 2015 Oct 20.  And they made it even more stable.  Then they actually added dynabeads to those nanoparticles surrounding the mRNA of snake venom and it made it even more stable.  It made it last longer.  It made it to get inside your cells.  Dynabeads are magnetic metals nanoparticles.  

36:54  Cites Season 4, Episode 15 of The Blacklist, 2016, called "The Apothecary."  Peptides found in krait venom poisoned Raymond "Red" Reddington.  In the show, you learn that he was poisoned by drinking from his drink.  Then I realized something.  I realized how they've been spreading this.  Odd that the CDC's website has a wastewater page with COVID tracker.  

45:00   

49:00 

Well, you'd think that new information like what Dr. Ardis presents here with Peters would bring ah-ha moments, and it does for his audience.  It did for me.  I'd heard that the spike proteins contain a genetic sequence of snake poison.  What I thought was interesting was how specific Ardis was by pointing out the King Cobra and the Chinese   Oh, and by the way, I am all for men like Ardis, who is a chiropractor by trade, to insert his research findings onto other fields.  This is how insights come about.  Now it's up to the scientific community to verify or deny it.   

Look. It AIN'T F*KCING SNAKE VENOM FOLKS.

No need to keep sending me the video. I appreciate the enthusiasm and thought. I watched it.

However, IT MIMICS SNAKE VENOM.  https://t.co/5IoPpvZGIy pic.twitter.com/nt3FuaI81J

— Walter M Chesnut (@Parsifaler) April 12, 2022

One scientist I follow, Walter Chestnut, says that there is no snake venom per se, but rather the spike protein ACTS like snake venom.  Chestnut calls the protein an epitope, which are antigens that 

And by this, I mean it's common epitopes that mimic. Not literal snake venom. Absurd.

— Walter M Chesnut (@Parsifaler) April 12, 2022

Good to know that there are remedies to snake venom poisoning.

Cobra venom protein sequence in C19, possibly the med. that begins with R. Be ready when time comes. Beware the V. This Tweet needs no warning, it is a warning. pic.twitter.com/q5CbqzZxdz

— DCGreenZone1 (@DCGreenZone) April 12, 2022

It's important to take nicotine lozenges.  Why?  Because nicotine blocks the snake venom inside the spike protein and keeps it from lodging in nACH Receptors.

*switched to lozenges. The patch can cause skin irritation https://t.co/HDBsGNrFi2

— Jennifer Depew, RD (@deNutrients) April 12, 2022

Study shows remdesivir as primary COVID treatment is a total bust

Fauci perfect record intact.

"Routine use of remdesivir may be associated with increased use of hospital beds while not being associated with improvements in survival."https://t.co/WcPZ2RO6QV

— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) July 15, 2021

by Daniel Horowitz for The Blaze, reposted at the Ron Paul Institute

Sixteen months into this virus, our government has nothing to offer us in terms of treatment in the hospital but remdesivir at $3,100 a dose and zero treatment options at the critical early-stage, when serious complications can be pre-empted. Now, a new study from the University of Iowa shows what we knew all along – that remdesivir failed to reduce mortality one iota. Why are we to believe the same government entities about embracing the clot shots and shunning so many other cheaper and effective treatments after spending billions and losing countless lives on a failed drug?

After 62 studies, 32 of them randomized controlled trials, establishing ivermectin as an effective treatment and an even more effective preventative to keep people out of the hospital in the first place, our government refuses to endorse its use and Big Tech continues to censor it. They claim they need more studies. Yet not a single randomized controlled trial showed remdesivir to be effective before they dove in headfirst and the NIH made it the only approved antiviral treatment for COVID. Now, a University of Iowa study published in JAMA Network Open on Thursday has shown that remdesivir was a complete bust.

Among the 2,334 US veterans studied in 124 hospitals, a higher share of remdesivir patients (12.2 percent) who took part in the study died than patients in the control group (10.6 percent). Moreover, on average, remdesivir patients spent six days in the hospital, while control group patients spent only three.

Previously, last October, the World Health Organization found that use of remdesivir in 11,000 patients across 400 hospitals in the world failed to lower the mortality rate or truncate time of stay in the hospital.

Take a look at this chart of treatment protocols for COVID hospital patients from the NIH, and you will see that aside from remdesivir, the only other treatment they offer is dexamethasone as the corticosteroid of choice to treat inflammation.

Again, dexamethasone was approved after just one randomized controlled trial last year, when ivermectin had over two dozen. This new study from the University of Iowa seems to show that dexamethasone is also a bust because outcomes did not improve among those who received that steroid along with remdesivir, as opposed to the control group that did not. In other words, after 16 months of research by doctors on numerous helpful antiviral and anti-inflammatory drugs, as well as more effective corticosteroids, the government has ensured that we have not advanced one iota in treating this virus. This is truly criminal and probably the gravest scandal of COVID.

Contrast this to ivermectin, which is available for $25. A Cochrane-standard (the highest level review) meta-analysis of ivermectin against COVID-19 by Bryant-Lawrie, which has been published in the American Journal of Therapeutics, concluded that ivermectin reduced fatality in hospitalized patients by 62%. But more important is getting people to use this immediately in an outpatient setting and, for vulnerable people, even preventively. The study found that "ivermectin prophylaxis reduced covid-19 infection by an average 86%."

Fair use excerpt. Read the whole article here. 

DR. ARDIS: HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS WERE DYING FROM REMDESIVIR BUT HOSPITALS WERE TAGGING THE DEATHS AS COVID DEATHS TO SCARE U.S. POPULATION

Dr. Ardis is one of the American doctors

Bioweapon is designed to target heart and muscle tissue.  The only authorizied drug to 

19:54  The mRNA vaccines dramatically increase 1) heart inflammation leading to myocarditis, 2) increasing blood clot disorders, 3) increasing heart disease, 4) increasing strokes and other cardiovascular events immediately following the vaccines.  And they published the resulting damage to the heart after the Pfizer shot, we are observing as the American Heart Association, that they're seeing that these are long-lasting side effects and they're staying for at least two and a half months after the second shot.  So this is their warning.  So the spike proteins, just so you know, judge, jury . . . have been designed to target and stop hearts of people around the world.  Remdesivir is known to cause heart failure, kidney failure, liver failure, which causes death and increases death and likelihoods of mortality with the drug Remdesivir.  

20:47  "The vaccines are," published by the American Heart Association  "to directly cause heart attacks, strokes, and blood clots.  That's what it does.  The entire plandemic, the entire plandemic and the medical protocols and then restricting certain drugs like chloroquine that Anthony Fauci said was proven to be cardiotoxic, leading to death of COVID-19 patients in May of 2020, I just showed you The Cardiovascular Toxicology Journal says that Remdesivir is FAR MORE heart toxic than Chloroquine.  Yet two months later, the FDA ignores that.  The NIH ignores that.  Then in December they go ahead and publish their updates.  And the update is "Only Remdesivir is FDA approved."  Still.  There is an outright attempt to murder people and kill people, and they are going after the elderly first.  Now they're targeting the young, and I'm going to show you, and this is when I showed them, and this is when Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, and if you just watch his face, he couldn't believe it.  And I know the world needed to know it, so I needed to take the world's audience through this.  

21:50  With all the information I've given to you about Remdesivir and its toxic effects on the human body, the FDA in America on January 21, 2022, just three weeks ago, now has authorized, and I pulled up the document and I read the title, "The FDA Is Now Extending the Emergency Use Authorization" and they're saying that Remdesivir is the only authorized to treat all COVID-19 pediatric-age people.  And it says, right here in the title, "It starts with newborns 7 pounds heavy."  So any baby, 3.5 kilograms, and anyone older than that . . . .  I said, so now they're taking babies, who are born to women in hospitals, are taking them to the nursery and they tell you to PCR test them.  If it comes back positive, insert intravenously and pump that baby three days full of Remdesivir.  And then it says, in the actual EUA, there is no alternative approved treatment for pediatric patients except for Remdesivir.  And I said, "I have to make the world know what it says in here because it is only an emergency use authorization, not an approval by the FDA.  And it says that.  So I took them through, and your audience should know this too.  

  

SHARYL ATTKISSON: Whistleblower: Remdesivir linked to 601 military deaths

(READ) Whistleblower: Remdesivir linked to 601 military deaths https://t.co/Mm52ivcIVY

— Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋 (@SharylAttkisson) October 12, 2024

A military whistleblower has released documents, known as “The Remdesivir Papers,” revealing that 601 military service members died after being treated with the controversial antiviral drug Remdesivir for suspected COVID-19 cases. The documents claim the drug was administered months before it was approved by the FDA, with serious concerns about data manipulation and lack of informed consent in the trials.

The whistleblower, using the pseudonym Daniel LeMay, shared the documents with investigative journalist J.M. Phelps, exposing that many trial results were kept secret and highlighting remdesivir’s potential role in hundreds of untimely deaths. According to LeMay, the Department of Defense’s Joint Trauma System manipulated trial data to favor remdesivir, and participants were often not informed about the risks involved.

Advocacy groups and former victims of COVID-19 hospital protocols, including those involving  Remdesivir, have expressed outrage, calling for greater accountability. Gail Seiler, a survivor of remdesivir treatment, stated that the papers “only scratch the surface” of the harm caused by the drug in both military and civilian hospitals.

All of the information here needs to be made public, and the public officials, including Tony Fauci, need to be held to account for the criminal acts associated with the fraudulent trials of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine that were tainted in order to preclude their use, and making remdesivir the standard of care despite the obvious data showing that it kills people.“

Brian Hooker, Ph.D., Chief Scientific Officer, Children’s Health Defense.  

NURSE: 4 DOSES OF REMDESIVIR KILLED MY BEST FRIEND'S HUSBAND

Nurse sounds the alarm. pic.twitter.com/ao6J0fbPbP

— samuelbellows (@samuelbellows1) January 17, 2022

Hospitals give hospitalized COVID patients Remdesivir.  Why?  Because it's safe and effective?  No.  It's not safe at all.  It killed 53% of patients in an ebola trial.  People have better odds with Russian Roulette.  It's given to hospitalized COVID patients by order of the CDC.  Think of the CDC as bookies for the pharmaceutical industry.  FDA rubberstamps approval on Big Pharma products, who then need to get their product to market.  That's where the CDC comes in.  They cook deals with hospitals around the country so that hospitals are incentivized monetarily to force-feed patients Remdesivir.  Their pimps, uh, brokers cut deals with hospital consortiums across the United States.  To cast the patina of legitimacy on the process, the CDC may hand the payment process on Remdesivir over to Medicare and Medicaid.  Remdesivir kills your kidneys.  

If a loved one must go into the hospital, make sure you or someone in your family or your loved one ask what is in the IV drip.  

Even this article by NBC News cites the WHO's position on Remdesivir, saying that it has no effect on mortality, meaning if you're close to dying Remdesivir is not going to bring you back.  No kidding.  Not only will it not bring you back, it will push over the cliff of death BECAUSE IT KILLS YOUR KIDNEYS.  Be sure to listen to Bryan Ardis in the first post you find in the links above.  That article makes zero reference to the ebola trial where Remdesivir killed 53% of patients in the trial.   

"I did everything I could to protect her but I still couldn't protect her from these evil people that murdered her"

Here is the interview.

Hospitals were getting a $39,000 dollar kickback for putting patients on a ventilator, so when we said we didn't want her on a ventilator or her to be given Remdesivir, whatsoever, they immediately made a sign, DNR, Do Not Resuscitate.  So they knew that my mother was going to die, so for people complaining at home, you know, the arm-chair conspiracy theorists, they want people to die because this is the problem: they were not able to get Emergency Use Authorization on the vaccine if there is any sort of remedy for COVID0-19.  If there's any available remedy.  Now, you can technically call Ivermectin an available remedy.  Because of that, because Ivermectin actually works against COVID-19, it would have negated the vaccine, they denied people like my mother Ivermectin.  And then they use Remdesivir when they know from the studies that half the people die from the trials, they gave it to people like my mother behind our back, knowing they had the legal liability to give it to her whatever they wanted because that was the government protocol for COVID, so they murdered my mom right in front of my face slowly . . . .  

She died on October 21, 2021, thirteen days after his birthday.  Really sad.  I still have the last gifts my mother gave me--the notes and cards.  She was my biggest fan, watched all the stuff, and then 2 weeks later, she's dead.  Life is fragile.  I didn't expect to lose my mom.  She did everything.  She wore a mask.  She got vaccinated because she would have lost care from her doctor, she didn't even tell me about it, only told her sister.  She didn't even want me to know because I was so anti-vaxx.  So once again, they killed with the vaxx, they killed her with Remdesivir, they killed her with the protocols.    

My mom was in an accident when I was younger, and my mom was on disability, I took care of my mom, I took care of my mom.  I TOOK CARE of my mom, that's why I feel immense guilt.  I did everything I could to protect her but I still couldn't protect her from these evil people that murdered her.

How could you give her Remdesivir when we both told you not to give it to her?  Did they wait until she was asleep and then give it to her?  Did you figure out how they gave it to her without her consent?  I was very lucky to be in the room with her for 4 hours a day of visitation.  But, Dan, there are so many wires, so much stuff going in and out of there.  And because of intubation, they have what is called a C-Pap machine almost, it just blows in the air.  It was very uncomfortable.  One is Remdesivir, and one is steroids, I don't know.  It doesn't matter.  We told them no Remdesivir, no Remdesivir whatsoever.  My mom was fine.  The only reason she went to the hospital is that she was that she got it too fast, she hit her head and almost fainted.  She did not really even want to go to the hospital.  Long story, short, she called the hospital, and they told her that her breathing is fine.  And the second time, she got up so fast she hit her head and got nervous, thinking that she should go into the hospital because she'd never fainted like that before.  And the next thing you know, those first two days she and I were sitting there, having a conversation, drinking McDonald's milkshakes, and once they started administering Remdesivir, my mom's entire organs filled up with fluid and she died in my arms 5 days later.  

And when you asked to give her Ivermectin at Baylor University Hospital, 

They had 11 different cords going into my mother, they told you it wasn't part of the protocol because it wasn't part of the government, or what was their excuse?  They looked at me like I was a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist like I was They may as well have thought I was QAnon when I asked for that in that hospital. 

The worst of it all was when I was talking about Ivermectin, they had the police escort me out because those nurses were so nervous because those nurses said I was going to do something to them after my mom died.  I'm just saying that's how they treated me.  I would never hurt a nurse, but they were so nervous because they were treating me like absolute crap, like I was an anti-vaxxer, making me feel guilty while I was watching my mom die.  The last thing I'm going to say is nothing scares me, Dan.  When I go into a protest with Antifa, I could care less.  I watched my mom die.  I was so scared to go to that hospital every single day.  So nothing will ever be as bad as 

John Zingsheim survived a 10-month stay in the hospital after finally being treated with Ivermectin.  

The Story Of Ivermectin And COVID-19

NCBI explains that 

Ivermectin proved to be even more of a ‘Wonder drug’ in human health, improving the nutrition, general health and wellbeing of billions of people worldwide ever since it was first used to treat Onchocerciasis in humans in 1988.

The narrator explains that Ivermectin, discovered in the 1970s, treats river blindness caused by a parasitic worm and caused untold suffering and even death in Central and Southern America and much of Africa. 

Instead of Ivermectin, Fauci endorsed Remdesivir, which has a lousy effect on mortality.  In fact, in the study that initially began to examine mortality, Fauci switched the results or endpoint of the study from Remdesivir’s impact on mortality to Remdesivir’s impact on “time it takes to recover.”

So why would Dr. Fauci and NIH continue to endorse a drug that costs $3,100 per course of treatment [unlike Ivermectin, which is narrowly free] and that has shown to have no impact on mortality?  Who makes Remdesivir and how are they related to who gets to decide which drugs can be used to treat COVID-19? 

Remdesivir is made by Gilead Sciences, a pharmaceutical company located in Foster City, CA.  From 1997-2001, the chairman of Gilead was Donald Rumsfeld, one of the architects of the War in Iraq.  

When Ford lost the 1976 election, Rumsfeld returned to private business and financial life, and was named president and CEO of the pharmaceutical corporation G. D. Searle & Company. He was later named CEO of General Instrument from 1990 to 1993 and chairman of Gilead Sciences from 1997 to 2001.

During the same period, one of the board members of Gilead was George Schultz, a long-time Bush Family ally who was instrumental in convincing George W. Bush to run for the United States.  

In order to understand why the NIH treatment panel is so pro-Remdesivir, it’s essential to understand the financial ties between Gilead Sciences and members of that treatment panel.  Looking at the treatment panel’s financial disclosures, you will see that no fewer than 7 members disclosed financial support from Gilead Sciences.  Interestingly, the 3 co-chairs who select the other members of the panel, do not disclose support from Gilead.  However, two of the Chairs, Roy Gulick and Henry Masur, both receive financial support from Gilead.  Even more interestingly, the third co-chair, Clifford Lane was actually was one of the authors of the NIAID study on Remdesivir, but you won’t see his name in the list of the article’s authors.  You have to look at the financial disclosure form that accompanied that article.  

It’s also worth noting that 7 out of 12 of these co-authors on that study disclosed funding from Gilead Sciences.  The significance of this cannot be overstated.  Two of the three chairs of the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Panel, the people who put the panel together, received financial support from Gilead Sciences, while the other was intimately involved in the study that attempted to and failed to prove that Remdesivir was an effective treatment of COVID-19.  

Given these professional and financial ties, is there any way that we could reasonably expect them to impartially judge the best treatments for COVID-19?  Or choose panel members who advocate for repurposing cheap, off-patent drugs that would completely undercut the market for one of the main products of a company with which they enjoy close financial and professional ties? 

This seems like good news.

Curious what Ivermectin skeptics have to say about these results.

Thanks to Ryan Dawson.  https://t.co/QvGIEbwq1S

— Stephen W. Carson (@RadicalLib) September 5, 2021

Medicare Pays Doctors a 20% Bonus If They Give Hospitalized Patients Remdesivir

from Rumble. 

Ivermectin has been a human medicine for 34 years. 

It's been used to treat Yellow Fever, Dengue, Coronaviruses, and more.

The real Delta is the antibody-dependent Enhancement or the reactions to these vaccines, but they don't want people to say that.  

Fauci knew that Remdesivir was a killer.  It was tested for Ebola in Africa.  It led to death.  It shuts down the kidneys.  It floods the lungs with fluids. The patients, their advocates, as well as their loved ones are losing total control.  

Remdesivir kills the kidneys and a quarter of animals in trials.  It was such a deadly medicine in the Ebola trials.  They give it at the wrong time.  It may have efficacy in the first couple of days when the virus is replicating, but when people come to the hospital they're past the viral replication stage and you have to treat inflammation.  At that point, you should be focused on giving them anti-inflammatories.  Giving them Remdesivir actually gives them a higher chance of them going into organ failure.  Physicians aren't reading the data on Remdesivir and are still willy-nilly giving something that is highly, highly toxic is mindboggling to me from a medical point of view and a scientific point of view.  It doesn't make any sense whatsoever.  

Doctors do know.  There's a 20% bonus if a doctor sticks a needle in an arm and gives them Remdesivir.  Welcome to hospitalized care via CDC protocols.  It's in the Medicare documents.  Hmm.  This article corroborates almost verbatim Dr. Cole's point exactly. 

Hospitals will receive an additional payment when treatment includes Veklury (remdesivir) or COVID-19 convalescent plasma to treat patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Like a new technology add-on payment, the cost of the drug won’t be entirely folded into the MS-DRG.

The only hitch is hospitals must ensure they make a connection to the Medicare bonus for COVID-19 inpatients, said attorney Daniel Hettich, with King & Spalding in Washington, D.C. “You have to be eligible for the 20% add-on to get the new therapeutic add-on,” he said. “If you don’t have a positive test, you don’t qualify for the new treatment add-on payment.”

It's incredible.  Check out this documentary on Ivermectin to learn how Remdesivir was privileged over Ivermectin.  

These murder-for-money schemes are essentially bailouts for hospitals, who turn around and bribe their employees--nurses, aides, orderlies, etc.--with high-dollar salaries.  I know for a fact from one nurse recruiter that Massachusetts was paying over $7,000 clear per week in one city there.  

That same article also explains the coercive push behind the vaccines.  The government is paying the hospitals to give the vaccines for free. 

The interim final rule, which implements section 3713 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, also said Medicare, Medicare Advantage (MA) and commercial payers must offer FDA-approved vaccines free to patients. Medicare and MA will pay hospitals, physicians, pharmacists and others a fee for the administration of the vaccine and a fee for the vaccine itself. A provision in the Affordable Care Act that requires coverage of preventive care without cost sharing provided a “pathway” to sweep in private payers, said Valerie Rinkle, president of Valorize Consulting. CMS also revised the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model because of the public health emergency (PHE). 

These details of the CARES Act were lost on the American people who were dazzled by the incredulity of $1,400 government checks.  So while Americans were all so giddy about where they'd planned to spend their newly created dollars, big pharma was designing how to whip up a propaganda campaign to get more Americans filled with toxic spiked proteins.  Note the date when Trump signed the CARES Act and how it corresponded with the nationwide lockdown.  

On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed the bill into law. With most forecasters at the time predicting that the U.S. economy was either already in a recession or heading into one, policymakers crafted legislation that dedicated historic government funding to support large and small businesses, industries, individuals, families, gig workers, independent contractors, and hospitals. 

California's Stay-at-Home orders were announced on March 19, 2020.  Here's a timeline that, if for nothing else, helps keep track of the events that you've already come to forget.  This table also gives you the start and end dates of the lockdowns in different states and counties.   

Toward the end of the interview, Stew Peters kind of throws up his hands and asks, What do we do to get our medical freedom back?  "Where is the neutrality in medicine?"  Ha!!!  First, if he is asking how we force the hospitals to rewrite their ethics so that they serve the health of people in their care, ah, good luck with that.  Like any other business, hospitals work for a profit.  They have protocols, and those protocols are set by the CDC.  So already when you go into a hospital, you're walking into a dead zone that operated remotely.  The staff simply follows the protocols because if they didn't, or if they don't, they'd get fired.  So there's that tether.  Don't expect to have your health restored in a hospital.  A friend insists that America has the best emergency medicine.  I say prove it.  Compared to what? 

Dr. Cole says that monoclonal antibodies save lives.  

  

 

ZOWE SMITH: Patients on ventilators for over 30 days [hospitals got] over $1 million . . .

"In 11 years of medical coding I've never seen a case of pneumonia that ended up with massive organ failure, ventilator for 30 days, and death...it all happened around the COVID [testing/bonuses.]"

"Patients were on ventilators for over 30 days...[that's]...over $1 million..."… pic.twitter.com/M4n7vwT8Iq

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) September 15, 2024

 "In 11 years of medical coding I've never seen a case of pneumonia that ended up with massive organ failure, ventilator for 30 days, and death...it all happened around the COVID [testing/bonuses.]"

"Patients were on ventilators for over 30 days...[that's]...over $1 million..." Medical whistleblower, author, and former medical coder Zowe Smith (

@Zowe_TKMC

) describes for Weezy on the What is TRUTH? PODCAST (@WhatTruthPod) how hospital protocols changed once COVID testing and bonuses were implemented due to the CARES Act. (Which was signed into law by President Trump in March 2020.) "If you go through the CARES Act line by line, you're not gonna see something that says, 'If you put a patient on a ventilator, you get a 20 percent bonus.' However, if you understand the payment system of coding, it's there," Smith says. The whistleblower adds that patients who were put on a ventilator for 96+ hours were placed into the highest payment category. "If your DRG [diagnosis related group] was COVID and you're on a ventilator, you get a 20 percent bonus just for having COVID, and then you also get the bonus because you're bumped into the highest paying category for that diagnosis related group because of the ventilator use," Smith adds. Furthermore, the whistleblower notes that "there was [also a] bonus for [use of] Remdesivir." "They considered Remdesivir a new-tech drug and it was Gilead, Fauci, and the NIH that developed Remdesivir and decided we should be using it...So every single dose, every individual dose that they gave you of Remdesivir, gets them a 20 percent bonus. So that was hella money for them [the hospitals]." Indeed, Smith notes that these bonuses were the saving grace of hospitals who were in severe need of revenue, as the COVID "lockdowns" in 2020 starved them of patients. "Imagine being bankrupt and all of a sudden you see all these bonuses coming at you. If you're a hospital admin and you're responsible for the financial health of that hospital, and you see all these bonuses coming in, I bet you're gonna be telling your other buddies in admin to use those those protocols so you can get those bonuses so you can keep the doors open." Smith adds: "During the scamdemic, especially before the vaccine, I think they were practicing these hospital protocols that were killing people. Because before COVID, if you came in with pneumonia or cold or flu, you would you'd be home within 3 days probably. You almost never be put on a ventilator. We never treated it like that. There's never been I've never seen in 11 years of medical coding, I've never seen a case of pneumonia that ended up with massive organ failure, ventilator for 30 days. So something very, very different happened and it all happened around the COVID testing and the COVID bonuses." Partial transcription of clip: "Because patients were on ventilators for over 30 days, some of them. So that's an extremely long stay. That all I mean, that's very rare to have a stay like that, and they're almost all over a million dollars when you get to a stay that's that long. "And and when you couple that with. So, yeah, I believe it was up to 30,000 dollars in just bonuses, like, on top of their regular payment. Because what so this is kind what what people don't understand about the bonuses and and one of the things that I can't explain really well about bonuses is the ventilator bonus. So if you go through the CARES Act line by line, you're not gonna see something that says, if you put a patient on a ventilator, you get a 20 percent bonus. However, if you understand the payment system of coding, it's there. So, it for an inpatient, it goes to what's called IPPS, which is inpatient prospective payment system. It's a Medicare system. DRG means diagnosis related group. So what they do what Medicare's done is data mined all of these diseases. They've data mined all the treatments that it takes, and they've come up with, like, an average or a standard of care. And so they're like, a DRG for a heart attack, for example, they're gonna say these are the average day is x amount of days. "The average treatment is, you know, bypass CT scan, these certain labs, whatever, you know, kind of standard treatment it is, you know, whatever the drug standard treatment is. They know the average cost of all of that. And so they'll say, okay. This is the basic charge we're gonna pay you for that. So for an inpatient stay, they can't nickel and dime you for everything.

So you're not gonna see a charge for every single lab they do. You're not gonna see a charge for, you know, every single drug they give you or every band-aid they put on you like you will on an outpatient case because those are all individually charged if you're an outpatient.

When you're an inpatient, it's all, like, one bulk payment. So they've averaged out what all of this is, and they have a 3-tier payment system. "So for a heart attack, there will be, like, level 1, which is the lowest, level 2 where you get, like, a cc, which is called the comorbidity. You get more payment for that. And the third high or third one is the highest tier, and that's where you have the MCC or a major comorbidity, and that will get you the the highest payment that you can for that diagnosis. So ventilators are broken into the code itself, the procedure is broken into 3 different times. It's broken into less than 24 hours. That puts you in the lowest tier. Above 24 hours to 96 hours, that puts you in the middle tier for the CC. And then if you're over 96 hours on a ventilator, doesn't matter how many more days after that, there's one procedure code for over 96 hours.

"And, that will put you in the highest payment category. So they were getting 20 percent bonuses on top of their DRG. So if your DRG was COVID and you're on a ventilator, you get a 20 percent bonus just for having COVID, and then you also get the bonus because you're bumped into the highest paying category for that diagnosis related group because of the ventilator use.

And then there was the bonus for the Remdesivir. So there's something called new technology and when a new technology code comes out, it's a new procedure that we haven't done. Medicare hasn't data mined all this information. So it's considered high risk. So they're they usually pay a lot higher because this is kind of it's considered experimental until they have years and years of data saying what safety is. "So they considered Remdesivir a new tech drug and it was Gilead, Fauci, and the NIH that developed Remdesivir and decided we should be using it. What was Gilead that applied for the new tech bonus? So every single dose, every individual dose that they gave you of Remdesivir gets them a 20 percent bonus. So that was hella money for them. So imagine being bankrupt and all of a sudden you see all these bonuses coming at you. If you're hospital admin and you're responsible for the financial health of that hospital, and you see all these bonuses coming in, I bet you're gonna be telling your other buddies in admin to use those those protocols so you can get those bonuses so you can keep the doors open. "So...during the scamdemic, especially before the vaccine, I think they were practicing these hospital protocols that were killing people. Because before COVID, if you came in with pneumonia or cold or flu, you would you'd be home within 3 days probably. You almost never be put on a ventilator. We never treated it like that. There's never been I've never seen in 11 years of medical coding, I've never seen a case of pneumonia that ended up with massive organ failure, ventilator for 30 days. So something very, very different happened and it all happened around the COVID testing and the COVID bonuses."

Remdesivir increases the risk of death by 3%, the chances of renal failure by 20%, and costs $3,000/course. Ivermectin reduces the risk of death by 50% and costs the W.H.O. two cents

It should be clear by now that when you put your trust in doctors using hospital care, those doctors are not using their best tested, studied options or practice.  No.  Unfortunately, they're merely following the orders from on high, even from international bodies, far removed from local knowledge, local, standard, and tested care.  So when you think you are under the care of an expert, ah, your doctor is only an expert at following the orders of outside agencies.   

Remdesivir is bad. Fauci was so thrilled to push it. pic.twitter.com/8WWh7AKtpH

— Broken Truth 🐭 (@BrokenTruthTV) November 1, 2022

If you look at the 4 independent studies, including the large studies by the W.H.O. it shows the opposite effect.  Remdesivir increases the risk of death.  Let me say that again.  Remdesivir increase the risk of death by 3%.  It increases your chances of renal failure by 20%.  This is a toxic drug.  But just to make the situation even more preposterous, the federal government will give hospitals a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill if they prescribe Remdesivir to Medicare patients.  [Oh, so the federal government is trying to kill elderly patients.  Huh.]  The federal government is incentivizing hospitals to prescribe a medication which is toxic.  So it should be noted that Remdesivir costs about $3,000 a course.  Dr. Kory spoke about Ivermectin.  Ivermectin reduces the risk of death by about 50%.  It costs the W.H.O. $0.02.  Two cents.  So as regards Dexamethazone,  This is the wrong drug in the wrong dose for the wrong duration of time yet every clinician in this country will absurdly use this homeopathic dose of Dexamethazone.  Why?  Because the NIH tells them to do this.  So what the NIH and other agencies have ignored are multiple FDA-approved drugs.  These are FDA-approved drugs.  These are not experimental drugs, which are cost-effective, and safe, and have unequivocally, unequivocally been shown to reduce the death of patients in the ICU and in hospital . . . .