this will be shocking to people, President Truman vetoed [McCarran Internal Security Act of 1950]; he vetoed that law, yes, he did and yet a bipartisan Senate overrode that veto so that we could actually address the subversion that was already changing our system in this very dangerous fashion. --Diana West
the situation is so dire in terms of the belief systems animating these far left and Islamic candidates in terms of our system. They're not extreme in their own system. Go and be a Sharia candidate in the numerous countries of the Islamic world, right, that's fine. It's not weird or crazy or extreme out there. It is here. --Diana West
My hot take - the morning after - https://t.co/UV75QXzK3v
— @realDianaWest (@realDianaWest) November 6, 2026
4:15. It was a blue Massacre is what it was, and I know that there are many facets to what happened in the midterms because as we've mentioned before this was not the Democrat Party. It's not Democrats vs. Republicans, it's communism vs. Republicans. They are non JFK's party, these people. The dangerous thing, of course, in my opinion, is about allowing these Marxists in is that once they're in, they're going to find every way to stay in, whether it's cheat to see if she, they will do anything to stay in power and to have what happened last night is puzzling to me. So how do you see it, how do you break down what we saw last night?
5:02. Well, I think a good way to start is to get rid of the color blue for the Democrats and move it to red and green. It's a good idea but I have not done a tight tally on this, but Mike Waller from the Center for Security Policy has posted an interesting comment about this. He's saying that the red-green axis is becoming the majority coalition in Congress. Now what that means is that there is this very large Marxist factions and Muslim Brotherhood faction that are working together that are going to be the political engine of what we've been talking about for some years now with this red green axis which is essentially two sides of a totalitarian movement that is anti-constitutional and anti-American. Yeah, it's it's anti-American. This is where people become so befuddled and rightfully so or perplexed horrified all rightfully so because the question always becomes how can people want to overthrow our government and change her Constitution out of recognition and impose various totalitarian features of Marxism and Islam on us which is unconstitutional and the question is you know there have been the guardrails were pulled off of totalitarians entering into our system many many years ago and it goes back really I've been thinking about this more and more and it goes back to the days when Congress the Senate in particular bipartisan Senate and House looked at the subversion by communists of our government coming out of the World War II years and actually started doing something about it and one of the things they did was that they defined subversion in terms of the totalitarian system that wish to overthrow our country and they drew a big line against it and this was codified in a law called the McCarran Internal Security Act of 1950, which I will tell you, this will be shocking to people, President Truman vetoed it; he vetoed that law, yes, he did and yet a bipartisan Senate overrode that veto so that we could actually address the subversion that was already changing our system in this very dangerous fashion. And just to make a very long story short, this act, and acts like it, were systematically dismantled by the courts, by the Supreme Court and we were essentially left without the protection that such laws afforded us. You know, when our Founders were beginning their country, we didn't have things like communism and Islam as threats, but this totalitarian threat that's become so pernicious and forceful in the 20th century was addressed by law, but it was taken away from us. So, we're at this point now where we have subversives being elected, and that kind of language, I know some people will turn off to it, "subversive," what does that mean? It sounds crazy, red paranoia, this kind of thing. However, we could define it this way in terms of people who seek a totalitarian destruction of our constitutional republic.
8:44. It's a very simple concept and unfortunately, these are the people, the beliefs that seem to be dominant in this new Congress, in this new Senate that we will see seated come 2027. One thing I think will really shock people is to understand that senator Pat McCarron whose name is on that Internal Security Act 1950 was a Democrat. No, we had, this was a very bipartisan effort. We had Democrats and Republicans both Joseph McCarthy was a Republican Senator Pat McCarron was a Democrat; this was a bipartisan recognition of the dangers of totalitarianism which has been utterly neutered over the decades, over the generations and we don't even have a grasp on it at this point. So this was many, many other factors; this is where we are today. Unprotected. Lawless.
10:07. What were some of the responses, well, what was President Trump's response, what was, someone I'm not a fan of and I would never hope for, what was J. D. Vance's response and some of these so-called pundits out there?
10:33. It's a shock of course I was not shocked I I don't have high hopes I've seen many people saying how disappointed they were disappointed yes but not shocked I was expecting this I've been feeling the collapse really the kind of dissolution of our agenda are forward motion in many many ways we've watched the Trump agenda you know going forward from closing the border, pardoning J6 prisoners, going forward from those very clean successful acts we've watched a very frustrating two years where I feel Trump fell into trap after trap after trap purposefully set to distract from the agenda, taking him into the Alibaba taverns, Arabian Nights kind of weird rabbit hole of Qatar and Turkey and thinking he was going to solve the problems of the war in Gaza with the border nonsensical traps, and, yes, of course, he's responsible for etc., etc., etc. I agree, however, I do think that does not take away from the fact that I do believe these traps were set purposely to distract from the agenda, and unfortunately he fell into many of them. Then we also have the, I think, the biggest couple of, biggest culprits would be any other branches of government. We had a judiciary that has blocked him at every turn, trying to enforce the immigration long I guess actual murders, terrorists, killers, just the most egregious people, terrorists, of course, in the aftermath of October 7 attacks that seem to turn all the politics and all of the world into a new and perilous trap. And then, of course, we've seen the Senate, a special blame has to be placed on the side remember we had two houses of Congress for these past couple of years and the amount of harm that the GOP Senate did to the Trump agenda, to me, it's not to Donald Trump, it means to us, we elected him. This is an act of war against the people. That Senate under John Thune has been the single largest factor in the derailment of the Trump agenda as it's gone forward between courts and the Senate, get the save America Act to where voter ID and other protections of the vote by this time. We did not pass that. We did not get a single, President Trump did not get a single recess appointment he did not get any of his agenda items codified by this Senate, by John Thune from this very small state, and it's not just Thune, it's not really his personality, one person. All of the GOP Senators who did not do something about this. So there has been a sabotage of the American people over these two years that we see coming out in this absolutely catastrophic election. And I think catastrophic because it isn't really . . . , you know, I lived through I lived in Washington for many years. I watched these elections, midterms, the president losing power, going back to the other party, this and that some big wins, you know, over the years. You see these rocking back and forth of these matters. This is not normal. These people elected in this new class, you know, in the next class of Congress, they are coming from an extremism that is off the charts. The spectrum has to be extended to include these people coming from democratic socialists, coming from proponents of Islam, Sharia, Etc. The election to the Senate of el-Sayed is an absolute nadir, and I'm sure there will be more. Because this is someone who is so clearly identified with various arms fronts organizations personalities money funding all connected to the larger Muslim Brotherhood orbit of jihad. And yet even so, in a state like Michigan, which last time I looked still remain the majority of Americans. It is not an Arab colonized State at this point despite the large Muslim population and it's still very tiny by percentage points. However, it works whether there was fraud or not, it really doesn't matter. I mean it matters but not in the sense of the actual electoral outcome. I don't think there was fraud to an extent well we'll never know because we end up with this senate seat very important a senate seat in the hands of an outside and even there that cannot be turned back and then you have I mean the different delegations, New York, New Jersey. We had a New Jersey congressman who was I think you could call him a character witness for the blind sheiks in the World Trade Center bombing in 1993. He was a defense witness. Yeah more and it goes on you can start tearing these things out so when you're looking at this kind of an election it is electing enemies of this constitutional republic now hold seats in this constitutional republic so it's a very stark situation and then the question becomes will president Trump "work with Democrats"? I'm already hearing that noxious phrase. And I would just like to put it out there to people, the situation is so dire in terms of the belief systems animating these far left and Islamic candidates in terms of our system. They're not extreme in their own system. Go and be a Sharia candidate in the numerous countries of the Islamic world, right, that's fine. It's not weird or crazy or extreme out there. It is here.
