Detox, Lemon, Water, Salt,

SASHA LATYPOVA: [Professor Francis Boyle] was perfectly healthy prior and was teaching full time.

A retired pharma executive claims Professor Francis Boyle, who was set to testify in Dutch court against Bill Gates and Albert Bourla about COVID shots being bioweapons, may have been eliminated.

Boyle, a leading bioweapons expert, was found dead just three weeks after agreeing… pic.twitter.com/QhqAhsCher

— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) September 2, 2025

Now there was a 6th witness, Professor Francis Boyle, who is actually an expert on bioweapons, having drafted several bioweapons convention related laws in the US.  And 3 weeks after he agreed to testify on behalf of the plaintiffs that these products and the process was deployment of bioweapons, he suddenly died.  And we still don't know the cause of death.  And the only thing that we know is that he was perfectly healthy prior and was teaching full time.  He was in his mid-70s, and this was a shock to all of us.  This looks very suspicious to me.  I can't speculate on what happened, but I would really like to know the cause of death and we don't know that.  So that's where we are right now.  This is how serious it is.  These people stop at nothing.

KEVIN MCKERNAN: [Pfizer] knew this was going to happen, and they quickly went out and acquired cancer companies. They put $43 billion dollars into the acquisition of Seagen and they put $2.26 billion dollars to acquire Trillium Therapeutics

“This may be the largest carcinogenic hit ever, to the human population"

Wait till Trump finds out Pfizer did a "Bait and switch", injecting the World with "Process 2", containing SV40 sequences.

Pfizer obscured SV40 sequences from the FDA and then "they quickly went out and… pic.twitter.com/fPcESWUQGl

— Humanspective (@Humanspective) September 2, 2025

This is not conspiracy theory. This has been published in the BMJ by Retsef Levy, and they go through this process, one, where they ran these vaccines in trial and how they changed that when they decided to go and inject the rest of the world.  This is traditionally a mortal sin in vaccine manufacturing or in any sort of biological manufacturing.  The process is the product.  You change the process, you have to go through trials again, and the EMA even asked them to do that although they failed to.  They asked for another trial of 250 people once they changed the process, and that data was never delivered.  So this bait and switch is very important for you to understand why the trial data is of absolute zero consequence to what we're actually saying in the field. Those numbers are a caricature of what they're actually doing with these injections.  

They know something.  Pfizer very early on they had the data on this from the trial.  They knew this was going to happen and they quickly went out and acquired cancer companies. They put $43 billion dollars into the acquisition of Seagen and they put $2.26 billion dollars to acquire Trillium Therapeutics.  Trillium was focused on blood cancers that have a CD147 marker on them, okay?  That is one of the markers that is known to be involved in COVID, so they have a very interesting window on those malignancies and they're buying up the cancer companies that are probably going to play the biggest role in benefiting from the mess that they've created.  

1:33. So in summary, the Pfizer vaccines on the market are not the same formulation as what was tested in the clinical trials.  This is a big bait and switch and it's a fraud.  So you can't believe anything they're saying about the vaccine efficiency, which we have seen even those numbers decay over time.  This is probably why. They're not really what they trialed.  They gave you something different.  There is significant DNA contamination that's found, like 10 out of 11 studies have found this, and the ones that haven't found it have some financial conflicts.  So I think the consensus is out: 10 out of 10 of the real studies are finding this.  Several are through peer review, which have not been easy to get through peer review. The peer review journals do not like these papers.  They get beat around in peer review for months to years, but they're making their way out now. There is also significant DNA contamination now found in 5 peer reviewed studies that were not looking at this.  They were looking at people's blood and tissue and it was accidentally in there.  Other people had to go sleuth it out.  We've got cancer on the rise, and there are several papers that report cancer post- vaccination, like right at the site of injections you'll see neoplasms, all right?  So there's something going on here.  This can't be ignored, saying it's a coincidence anymore.  Now this is, these are liability free and they're often mandated, okay?  So this maybe the largest carcinogenic hit ever to the human population.  And we have these on childhood schedules.  We are giving these to pregnant women.  This has gone absolutely off the rails.  

DR. TOM COWAN: The Real Cause of Heart Attacks and Strokes

that's not the cause of heart attacks. . . . but eventually that became clear that it has to be something to do with the heart and the brain, not the blood vessels.  --Dr. Tom Cowan 

    Diabetics have more heart attacks but less plaque.

9:25.  The story was they walked up Mount Tamalpais or Mount Monadinock with their wife.  They felt a little funny, they had a little chest pain.  The wife said you have to go to the cardiologist.  They go to the cardiologist.  He does a test and he says "You are 94% blocked.  If you block anymore, you're going to have a heart attack."  And I thought to myself if all the blood to your heart goes through these three arteries and you're 94% blocked, that means you have 6% blood flow to your heart how did you walk up Mount Tam?  And you mean if you block from 6% to 4% or 3%, that's going to kill you?  6% is 0% effectively.  You don't have any blood flow to your heart, so it doesn't matter if you block any more because you're already at zero or close.  So that was weird.  

So then I did the thing which you would think all doctors would do, but as far as I know I'm the only one who has done it, which is I said, "Okay, there must be studies that look at people who die of heart attacks and they do an autopsy on them, and they see how many of them have a blockage in the blood vessel leading to the part of their heart that had the heart attack."  Right?  If somebody says your sink is leaking, you go to call a plumber.  He looks at the pipe leading to your sink, and says "Nope, it's not blocked.  It's good.  It's not the pipe."  What I found was that when they started this heart attack theory, called the thrombosis theory that the cardiologists didn't believe it.  They said, no, it's got nothing to do with the blockages.  There's a robust blood flow through secondary collateral vessels. It's got nothing to do with blockages.  So I looked, and it turns out that there were a bunch of studies from the 1940s and '50s, '60s looking at the percentage of people who died of a heart attack.  So these are the worst of the worst, right?  They had a heart attack and they died.  Not everybody dies.  The highest number I found was 78% and the lowest number was 18% had a blockage which means that somewhere between 22% and 82% had no blockage in the area of the blood vessel leading to the part of the heart that had the attack.  So why did they die, like what happened to them?  Now even if you have 78% that doesn't mean that was there before the heart attack because then I read a book called the edopathogenesis of coronary artery disease or coronary heart disease by a pathologist name Giorgio Baraldi.  You can look up the book, and he studied people who died of heart attacks for 40 years with autopsies.  And he said, " 41% of them have a blocked artery leading to the part of the heart that died, and of those 41%, half of the blockages clearly came after the heart attack not before."  In other words, there was damage to the heart, like a dam there's damage to the river and you get backflow and build up of the debris in the river coming into the dam.  So we're talking 18% of the people had any blockage before the heart attack of the people who died and had an autopsy.  So that made me, being the reasonable person that I maybe, say, "that's not the cause of heart attacks."  Now at the time I didn't know what it was which is fine you don't have to know what's true in order to know what's not true.  That is a fundamental principle of logic, rational thinking, and supposedly science, even though most doctors have never heard of it.  But you don't know if somebody says, "Oh, I had video at a 7-Eleven, somebody was shot and killed and it was a man between 18 and 60 wearing jeans.  So you're under arrest."  You say well I wasn't there I was in Singapore, not Boston, and I have proof and you prove that you weren't there, etc.  And the guy says, "Until you prove to me who killed, tell me who killed the guy, you're under arrest."  Like that's ridiculous, right? Nobody would say that.  All you have to prove is that you weren't there.  And so we've proven that that's not the cause of heart attacks.  Now again, I didn't know what was, but eventually that became clear that it has to be something to do with the heart and the brain, not the blood vessels.  So it turns out that what happens is there's an imbalance in the energy generation in the heart and the heart goes what's called glycolytic which means it builds up acid just like if your muscle exceeds it's capacity like your leg you build up lactic acid and you get a cramp.  Why doesn't your leg have an attack?  Because your leg stops, and you flush the lactic acid out and then you go on your way.  Same thing happens in your heart.  Your heart isn't efficiently burning fuel, and so it uses accessory pathways to ferment, which means lactic acid, which causes cramps which we call angina.  The difference with your heart and your brain compared to the spleen and your liver and your foot is your heart and the brain can't stop.  So they keep going.  They build up more acid that causes a breakdown of the tissue, which is what we call a heart attack, and then the debris builds up up river,  which is why you get plaque build up upstream.  And all of the changes you see with every heart attack is accompanied by a drop in the pH, acidity, and it's come because there's damage to the organ.  Now that can come from a lot of reasons: bad food, emotions, EMFs, heavy metals, stress, decreased parasympathetic tone.  And decreased small vessel blood flow, which was one of the [reasons] that diabetics get more heart attacks, but they don't get more plaque, which is an "anomaly," which means it doesn't make sense.  But it does make sense if you realize that all the blood flow or 90 something percent is small vessel blood flow, not large vessels.  Diabetics get small vessel disease, and so that's why they get heart attacks.  

17:37.  Plaque it turns out is an adaptive response as is everything in the body.  That's the magic of thinking differently.  So a blood vessel is a protein tube that has fluid in it that is water based that we call blood.  Now it turns out that every time there is a hydrophilic tube, like protein and water that there is an interface between them, which forms a protective gel.  You can prove that absolutely.  Like you put a beaker of water and you suspend a horizontal hydrophilic tube, and the water will start moving in the tube because there's a gel that's formed on the inside of the tube that is negatively charged, and that pushes the positive charge into the water.  They repel and start moving, and it all has to do with the formation of this gel layer inside the tube.  So that happens in your arteries.  

And that gel layer protects your arteries and your blood vessels.  Now the gel layer is increased with things like sun exposure and Earthing, connection to the earth, and when somebody puts their hands on you, or when you're sitting next to your dog, at least most dogs, or thinking good thoughts.  And if you put yourself phone next to the speaker the gel layer stops forming and the velocity of the blood stops moving.  Now the question I asked myself, "If you are a body and your smart and you have a person who hasn't projected their arteries with this gel, because they never move, they're never out the sun, they never connected to the earth, they have bad relationships, they eat bad food, and their dog died. 

So, the body patches the weak vessels with plaque.  That is a brilliant strategy, because then it won't burst. Now, the doctors come along and say, "We're going to scrape off the plaque."  [Tom laughs.]  It's like, "Oh, you have a cracked pipe," and so you put some cement on it, so it won't break.  Doctor says, "I know the problem with why you don't have good water flow. It's because the cement is restricting the flow, so we're going to get rid of the cement."  What happens next?  It bursts.  So that's what happens or could happen.  So the body doesn't want to, so it makes plaque.  Now that does have a problem.  Just like your pipe, you will get less blood flow through there.  But what are you going to do? The guy doesn't go out in the sun.  He doesn't eat good food.  He's got toxic relations.  You got no choice, so you do the next best thing you can, which is to make plaque.  

MILA JOY: D.O.G.E. has removed 11 MILLION scammers from the Social Security system so far.

And for two years all I heard when I brought up the potential to cut the spending was it’s not possible.

Here’s $250 billion a year

Or a quarter trillion here, a quarter trillion there and soon we’re talkin real money https://t.co/M8DYETilZD

— Tom Luongo (Head Sneetch) (@TFL1728) August 30, 2025