Tuesday, October 4, 2022

The problem with these claims in general and with this claim in particular is that he's lacking documentation, studies that prove his claims.  Without it, all he is doing is trading on his reputation.  And though he may in fact have an excellent reputation, when it comes to information about anything, it's fine to trust, but please, please verify the information.  Otherwise, you'll just end up as one of these social justice warriors who love to tag anyone they don't agree with or like with a horrible moniker, like "Nazi" or "fascist" or "racist."  I am sure I am missing a solid half dozen lefty tags.  So it would have been nice to have documents supporting his claim.  

And then his statement that the symptoms of graphene oxide are similar to COVID, well, that's not convincing,  You have a hundred other conditions whose symptoms match COVID, so that's not helpful.  Be specific with the symptoms of both COVID and graphene oxide.  And I am surprised that he failed to offer a single remedy that might even relieve the symptoms or the presence of graphene oxide in the tissue.  I have before.  Things like horseradish can dissolve the graphene oxide.  

Impressive Results with Serrapeptase

I've tried Serrapeptase and liked its effects.  It has the effect of clearing out energy, like the way you'd expect gingko biloba to work on your brain.  And though gingko biloba is a fantastic compound, I do content that serrapeptase make work even better albeit the two work on different mechanisms: biloba on vascular health and serrapeptase on protein build-up.  

So I went shopping recently on Amazon for a brand of Serrapeptase called Blockbuster All-Clear by Good Health Naturally.  It came recommended by DCGreenZone1.  The bacteria in this product lists 256,000,000 [million] CFUs or Controlled Forming Units.  Is that enough or too many?

When dealing with specific ailments, 15-45 billion CFUs is a good range.

A good range for a daily probiotic is between 5-10 billion CFUs.   



Serrapeptase® is offered in 250,000 units and uses patented delayed release capsule (DRcaps®) technology from Capsugel® to help ensure maximum absorption.

DESCRIPTION

Serrapeptase is a proteolytic (protein digesting) enzyme that has been used for over 30 years in the management of inflammatory disorders. Studies have shown that the serrapeptase enzyme can help to reduce inflammation, pain and can digest unhealthy tissue such as cysts, scar tissue, spurs and plaque. Our serrapeptase is high potency and comes in delayed release capsules to ensure maximum absorption in the intestines.

Potential health benefits of Serrapeptase:

  • Improved sinus and respiratory health: This enzyme helps to liquify mucous and clear it from the lungs and sinuses. It also helps to break down the biofilm (protective capsule) of bacteria, improving the immune systems ability to fight the infection. Serrapeptase has also been shown the reduce inflammation in the sinuses after surgery. 
  • Reduced joint pain and swelling: Serrapeptase can help to promote healthy joints as it aids in the breakdown of damaged and inflamed tissue. It may also help to reduce swelling in the joints and other parts of the body, and can help to alleviate pain. 
  • Improved arterial health and circulation: Serrapeptase could promote healthy circulation by helping to dissolve blood clots and plaque build-up in the arteries. This enzyme could promote good cardiovascular health. 
  • Reduced inflammation: This enzyme may help to break down histamine and bradykinin (inflammatory chemicals) to reduce systemic inflammation in the body. Serrapeptase has also been used for pain reduction, which could be related to its anti-inflammatory properties. 
  • Accelerated injury healing: Due to the ability of serrapeptase to help break down scar tissue, fight infections and reduce swelling, it could be used to help accelerate wound healing after injury. It could serve as a useful supplement post-surgery and could be beneficial after muscular or ligament injuries.

Britain's Vaccine Injured Get a Voice and a Charity


3:40-4:06, Georgia Segal.
"I remember getting out of the car and I burst into tears, and I said 'Please don't be alarmed at how I am walking.'  And it was then that I really realized, I think after the tremors on the Sunday that there was something seriously wrong.  And I'd been fine, like I'd been healthy, perfectly fine up until the point of me having my second vaccine.

5:47, Alex Mitchell.  

6:48, Charlotte Wright.  Widow of a British doctor who took the AstraZeneca vaccine.  Based on a balance of probability, the vaccine injured program in Britain awarded her $120,000.  Why does she think that this is enough to care for her family by herself?  What kind of a job does she have, or what other types of assistance is she getting?  

9:40  It's a scandal of such epic proportions, I think people don't know where to begin to begin with it.  It's frightening to even approach it."  --Dr. Clare Craig.

10:43, Caroline Pover.  Multiple symptoms after 1st AstraZeneca jab.  She runs a pickling business, writes books, and is a public speaker.  For 10 years, she supported a village in Japan, which was devastated by the tsunami, and to make her annual visit she took the jab.   5 months did hardly anything.  Exhausted constantly.  Head and eye pain was relentless.  Said she's only gotten 30% back of what she had before the vaccine.  

13:53, Dr. Aseem Malhotra.  Says that the spike protein is the mechanism of harm from the vaccine.  It gets distributed to every major organ system throughout the body, causing either a direct reaction through toxicity or an auto-immune reaction.  And that's the most likely explanation behind the mechanism of harm from the mRNA products.   

14:25  These "vaccines" were developed at warp speed, so much so that governments had to indemnify the drug companies against any future injury claims and invest billions up front.  They knew they were taking risks.

When vaccine safety and effectiveness showed up at 95%, relieved governments gave the green light.  Malhotra argues that the methodology for determining the product as "safe and effective" was flawed.  He says, "Relative risk reduction is a way of exaggerating the benefits of any intervention, clearly which would be in the interests of people trying to sell you something, which in this case is the pharmaceutical industry.  For example, if you had a 1,000 people in a trial that didn't have the vaccine versus a 1,000 that did, in the placebo group, in the dummy group, you may have 2 people dying and in the intervention group you may have just 1 person dying, and that's a reduction of 50%, 1 over 2, a 50% relative risk reduction.  But actually you've only saved 1 life out of a 1,000.  So the absolute risk reduction is only 1 in a 1,000.  It's a big difference.  The guidance has been for many years that we must always use absolute risk reduction in conversations with patients, not just relative risk reduction alone.  Otherwise, it's considered unethical.       

16:08  The accusation is that governments acted on Pfizer's relative risk figure of 95% efficacy when the absolute risk was a mere 0.84%.  In other words, you'd have to vaccinate 119 people to prevent just 1 from catching COVID.  

I would think that employees have plenty of data that allows them now to sue their employer for mandating the vaccine.    

U. OF MARYLAND described the use of a genetically modified live parasite as a vaccine as “a total game changer"

This story isn't going away.  Where are the authorities to prevent harm?  How does Bill Gates have carte blanche in in his ability to harm the land, the skies, and people's health?   

This is just incredible.  I hope the participants in the study made some decent money.  

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded a malaria vaccine trial study that used genetically modified (GM) mosquitoes to vaccinate humans.

team of researchers at the University of Washington conducted the study, which was published in the Science Translational Medicine journal.

The study involved 26 participants who received three to five “jabs” — or bites from a small box containing 200 GM mosquitoes — over a 30-day period.

Sanaria, a company funded in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), is closely connected to the research, and the researchers involved in the trial use a gene-editing technology heavily promoted by Bill Gates. 

What nefarious project ongoing somewhere in the world is Bill & Melinda Gates not involved with?  Like Fauci, the Gates monster can't hold to his word, or maybe he's truly living up  to his word when back in 2010 he called for "the decade of the vaccine."  He's applying more than a decade.  And each one of his vaccines are causing sterility in everyone who gets a jab.  

At present, only one malaria vaccine is in use. The RTS,S vaccine produced by GlaxoSmithKline was approved by the World Health Organization in October 2021, but reportedly has an efficacy rate of only 30-40%. 

That's cold comfort.  And my guess is that this GMO mosquito as syringe is not a new technology, that they've not only conducted trials, but they've also conducted clandestine field trials upon an unsuspecting people, like the folks in California and Florida.  

Why is it, too, that the outlet that these vaccine researchers go to is NPR?  I mean if you ask vaccine researcher how he feels about his vaccine research, aren't you kind of guaranteed to get the kind of answer you're looking for?  That's not exactly journalism.  That's stenography.

Dr. Kirsten Lyke, a vaccine researcher at the University of Maryland, described the use of a genetically modified live parasite as a vaccine as “a total game changer,” saying the team of researchers “went old school with this one.”

“All things old become new again,” Lyke told NPR.

Lyke, who was not involved in the GM mosquito malaria trial, led the Phase 1 trials for the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and also served as co-investigator for COVID-19 vaccine trials administered by Moderna and Novavax. 

Perhaps the real story are the conflicting statements.  At least in this article, that conflict is shown.  

In Brazil, the GM mosquitoes that were released were said to lack the ability to produce offspring — but were nevertheless found to have reproduced. 

This is what happens all the time.  These research companies or their vaccine manufacturer consortium or the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation will publish a press release about how wonderful the thing to disarm any criticism and critical thinking only to discover in follow-up that the experiment didn't go as wonderful as we thought.   Oh, what a surprise.  

Is this Gates paying lip service to consent?  

And even Gates, in his 2018 Foreign Affairs article, could not ignore the myriad of ethical controversies associated with CRISPR. 

The only reason the malevolent and sadistic eugenicist, Bill Gates, would ever grow excited about any new gene technology is if it renders the victims of this machinations totally and completely sterile with little evidence that that was the original intention. 

In a 2021 blog post addressing recent CRISPR-related developments, Gates said his “excitement about CRISPR has grown from super high to off the charts.”

Instead, he'll cite a bug or a rare mosquito that needs liquidating and use his GMO products to purportedly take out his designated and conjured enemy.  But he's really only interested in one thing: to depopulate the planet.  He is a eugenicist after all.  He wants to be like daddy.   Time to send the two of them back to Hell.  

ETERNALLY HOPEFUL: We survive the motions to dismiss & we will depose the Pfizer CEO, FDA, CBER, CDC, . . .