AUTHORITIES ARE UNABLE TO DISTINGUISH WHO DIED AS A RESULT OF [COVID-19] . . . OR OTHER SERIOUS DISEASES

In the commentary below, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee, discusses problems with the COVID-19 tests that are going on and the general panic surrounding the Coronavirus.  As of March 18, 2020, 1.2 million people have watched this presentation.

Thanks to Robert Wenzel and Karen DeCoster.  At TargetLiberty, Wenzel points out that 

that positive deceased patients have an average of over 80 years - 80.3 to be exact - and are essentially predominantly male (Women are just 25.8 percent).

And he noted:

The majority of the dead were carriers of chronic diseases.

At present, in fact, the authorities are unable to distinguish those who died as a result of the virus, from those who were mostly carriers of other serious diseases and who, therefore, would not have died from Covid-19," he said.

ISOLATING 70 YEAR OLDS IS FOR THEIR OWN GOOD, SAYS BRITISH HEALTH SECRETARY, MATT HANCOCK

Though I think that Jimmy Dore is terrific on exposing political hypocrisies, his explanation of how the Federal Reserve creates money seems confused.  Here he and his comedic staff cite MMT, Modern Monetary Theory as the process by which the Fed is creating money.  

Next, the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health, Anthony Fauci, sounds like a psychopath, someone who wants to use government fiat to halt human activity across a country 325 million in size.  He wants to mandate that everybody stay home.  First, if people are inside for hours and days they're not getting enough vitamin D that would protect them against viruses.  So off the bat, the head of the NIAI is offering extremely poor health advice, and Trump should fire him immediately.  Second, what right does the government have to tell property owners that they cannot operate their businesses, property that has previously been used in generating their livelihood?  Fauci is an absolute nut.  

Robert Wenzel reviews Fauci's comments on Meet the Press and other Sunday morning news programs.  

 Murray Rothbard regularly pointed out that wars enable governments to get more authoritarian.

He often quoted Randolph Bourne's observation that "war is the health of the state."

But don't think for a minute that bloody wars overseas are the only way states can grow rapidly. We are learning this first hand with the panic over COVID-19.

I have no doubt that this fear will result in legislation that puts more control in the hands of the state. Shady legislation is already starting to move.

Almost any kind of legislation can be passed in this atmosphere of panic.

And if there is one thing that is clear about Trump, it is that he is terrible at picking advisers. The White House is filled with neocon warmongers but his worst adviser may be the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health, Anthony Fauci.

Trump should have fired the bastard the day he took office. Instead, he has now made Fauci part of the coronavirus task force and praises Fauci publicly.

I can't think of anyone in the administration that is stoking more fear with the general public. Without any foundation, he has testified before congress that COVID-19 has a mortality rate of 10 times the flu. There is no factual basis for this, it is complete fearmongering. 

Fauci is, in effect, lying to Americans. 

He never ever puts things in perspective. He always heightens the panic. And he had plenty of opportunities this morning to do just that and he took full advantage. This morning he went on all the Sunday talk shows and cranked up the fear on each show.

He told "Face the Nation": 

      Right now, personally, myself, I wouldn’t go to a restaurant. 

Only to get more sadistic on CNN:

             For a while, life is not going to be the way it used to be in the United States. We have to just accept that if we want to do what’s best for the American public.

 And then on CNN pretty close to an outright lie, outside of some extreme outlier:

             There are going to be people who are young who are going to wind up getting seriously ill. 

Then more fearmongering on "Meet The Press":

             I think Americans should be prepared that they are going to have to hunker down significantly more than we as a country are doing.

I mean take a look at what this guy said, he pretty much said he would be in favor of a 14 day shut down of the entire country. The "Meet The Press" transcript:

Notice he didn't push back against the 14-day national shutdown, he went as far as he could in spewing panic that he thought he could get away with.

I really think he is mentally ill.

SurgeonGeneral Jerome Adams almost sounds rational compared to Fauci. At least he said at yesterday's press conference that "Almost all people will recover---98%--99%." 

Though there is plenty of evil in the U.S. government, it isn't the only cesspool for crime.  Take the United Kingdom, for example.  What they're proposing to do with older people, 70 years and older, is absolute criminal.  Isn't this kidnapping?  Russian Times in the UK writes, 

UK’s Health Secretary confirmed plans to isolate people aged over 70 for up to four months amid a coronavirus pandemic. The goal is to protect them, but critics say it may be a really bad idea. 

That wording is absolutely sinister, "We absolutely appreciate that it is a very big ask of the elderly and the vulnerable, and it's for their own self-protection," Hancock told Sky News' Sophy Ridge.  

Matt Hancock, Britain's Secretary of State for Health and Social Care

Oh, I see, it's for their own good.  Well, if it were for their own good, why would they need a government action plan to enforce something that is so good?  Lock Matt up.  Call this what it is: tyranny.  Even 80-year-old Brit, John Pilger is lukewarm in his reaction to the plan to pen British citizens under some kind of wartime measure.  Governments around the world are inventing the seriousness of COVID-19 to usher in new forms of murder.

The Johnson govt is to launch a "wartime" attack on Britain's elderly by forcing people over 70 into isolation for four months. A 2012 study showed isolation killed the elderly. Having destroyed state social care, extremist UK governments are now culling the expendable. Fascism.

— John Pilger (@johnpilger) March 15, 2020

Then Tom DiLorenzo writes in a post, titled "A National Emergency Declaration Is the Health of the State."

“It automatically sets in motion throughout society those irresistible forces for uniformity, for passionate cooperation with the Government in coercing into obedience the minority groups of individuals which lack the larger herd sense. The machinery of government sets and enforces the drastic penalties, the minorities are either intimidated into silence or brought slowly around by a subtle process of persuasion.”

“There is . . . in the feeling toward the State a large element of pure filial mysticism. This sense of insecurity, the desire for protection, sends one’s desire back to the father and mother, with whom is associated the earliest feeling of protection . . . .  [I]n Uncle Sam we have a symbol of protecting, kindly authority, and in the many Mother-posts of the Red Cross, we see how easily . . . the ruling organization is conceived in family terms.  [People become] obedient, respectful, trustful children again, full of that naïve faith in the all-wisdom and all-power of the adult who takes care of them, imposes his mild but necessary rule upon them and in whom they lose their responsibility and anxieties.  In this recrudescence of the child, there is great comfort.”

“On most people the strain of being an independent adult weights heavily.”  The State provides a way of eliminating “the psychic burden of adulthood.”

— Randolph Bourne, writing about the effects of the national emergency of war on the population in his famous 1918 essay, “War is the Health of the State.”

This is a must-read:  "COVID-19: Further Evidence That the Virus Originated in the U.S.," Larry Romanoff, March 14, 2020.  

TO ALL OF MY INTELLIGENT, "STAYIN' ALIVE" FRIENDS OF 60 & OLDER, KEEP YOUR HEALTH: TAKE 10,000 IU OF VITAMIN D/DAY

Kids, in school, say pretty mean things. Unholy schools create little monsters.  Viciousness is already prevalent.  The Coronavirus gives mean people license.  Robert Wenzel found one example of this: 

I have been informed by a relative who is a middle school teacher that students are now referring to coronavirus as the “boomer remover”

— B. W. Carlin (@BaileyCarlin) March 12, 2020

Then there was this. So it does look like us lived-long and lived-well folks need to be upping our vitamin D levels. 

Italian National Health Institute data from 12/3 show mortality among confirmed cases thus:

age 0-29: 0%
30-49: 0.1%
50-59: 0.6%
60-69: 2.7%
70-79: 9.6%
80-89: 16.6%
90+: 19%

88% of the deceased are age 70+.
Confirmed infections have a median age of 64 and are 60% male.

— Marcus Walker (@MMQWalker) March 13, 2020

But who's going to listen to this advice when they're not even sure of any benefits with vitamin D? But think about it. The folks who've gotten sick with the flu I mean Coronavirus have been folks on cruises 70-year-olds and folks in convalescent and nursing homes, octogenarians.  But how much vitamin D should one be taking?  Well, if the audience for this topic is mainly boomers, ages 60 to 75, more than likely your stomach acid production is down and you're not absorbing as many nutrients as you should or as you need.  Given this condition then, it makes sense to up the dose from what you might usually find inside a standard multivitamin formula.  Well, the best authorities to rely on with this subject would be Bill Sardi or John Cannell or Martie Whittikins.  Let me start with Sardi, who claims first that 600mgs. is too low.  And this is the recommended dose for healthy folks.  But what if you've got underlying conditions, like diabetes or obesity or chronic disease?  From the start of this article, Sardi focuses our attention on where Americans stand with regard to vitamin D consumption and supplementation. 

a revealing study showing diabetics, in particular, are at 4.5-times greater risk for an early death when their blood levels of vitamin D are low.  The risk of death from infectious disease also doubles for individuals who are deficient in vitamin D. 

Unfortunately, too many people take health and life for granted.  Fine.  I prefer survival.  So what amount does someone need to one, keep healthy, and two, survive?  

an estimated 42% of Americans are vitamin D deficient when defined as a blood concentration below 20 nanograms/milliliter/ 50 nanomoles/liter of blood.

A different analysis shows 9600 units of vitamin D from dietary supplements is needed to ensure 97.5% of the population achieves a blood level of 40 nanograms/100 nanomoles.  The answer? 

You need 10,000IU of vitamin D.  Sardi points out that 5,000 is insufficient.  

It takes about 5000 IU (international units) of oral vitamin D3 for most people to achieve a blood concentration of 50+ nanomoles or 20 nanograms. 

So 10,000IU should be your daily dose.  But what if you come down with a severe case of the flu, the cold, bronchitis, or, God forbid, the Coronavirus? Then you'll need to up your dose to 50,000IU for the length of the illness, maybe even a week following the resolution of your illness in case you have a residual and intractable symptom like a cough or phlegm build-up.  Then you can go back to maintenance levels of 10,000IU per day.

If you are above the 37th Parallel, you need to supplement with vitamin D.  Take 10,000IUs of vitamin D. 

Dr. John Cannell, according to Wikipedia, "hypothesized that Vitamin D deficiencies may predispose to influenza."  Hello. This is worth a few minutes of your time: 

Citing Dr. John Cannell's work, Martie Whittekin reminds us that 

For years, the nonprofit Vitamin D Council has monitored the science and informed us that higher blood levels of D (50--100nmol/L) were of benefit for immune function, muscles, heart function, lungs, brain, depression, breast cancer protection and so on.  

VIRUSES ARE LIKE LITTLE GREASE-NANOPARTICLES. SOAP DISSOLVES THE FAT MEMBRANE AND THE VIRUS FALLS APART OR BECOMES INACTIVE.

Here is an elegant explanation of why the simple but important task of washing your hands is effective in destroying germs, viruses, and bacteria. The pharmaceutical industry will claim that washing is not enough, that you will need some limousine prescription to fight that cold.  The following is a Twitter thread by Palli Thordarson, professor, School of Chemistry UNSW.  Bob Wenzel highlighted key points of the thread in [bold]:

1/25 Part 1 - Why does soap work so well on the SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus and indeed most viruses? Because it is a self-assembled nanoparticle in which the weakest link is the lipid (fatty) bilayer. A two-part thread about soap, viruses and supramolecular chemistry #COVID19

2/25 The soap dissolves the fat membrane and the virus falls apart like a house of cards and "dies", or rather, we should say it becomes inactive as viruses aren’t really alive. Viruses can be active outside the body for hours, even days.

3/25 Disinfectants or liquids, wipes, gels and creams containing alcohol (and soap) have similar effects but are not really quite as good as normal soap. Apart from the alcohol and soap, the “antibacterial agents” in these products don't affect the virus structure much at all.

4/25 Consequently, many antibacterial products are basically just an expensive version of soap in terms of how they act on viruses. Soap is the best but alcohol wipes are good when soap is not practical or handy (e.g. office receptions).

5/25 But why exactly is soap so good? To explain that, I will take you through a bit of a journey through supramolecular #chemistry, nanoscience, and virology. I try to explain this in generic terms as much as possible, which means leaving some specialist chemistry terms out.

6/25 I point out to that while I am expert in supramolecular chemistry and the assembly of nanoparticles, I am not a virologist. The image with the first tweet is from an excellent post here which is dense with good virology info:

7/25 I have always been fascinated by viruses as I see them as one of the most spectacular examples of how supramolecular chemistry and nanoscience can converge. Most viruses consist of three key building blocks: RNA, proteins, and lipids.

8/25 The RNA is the viral genetic material -it is very similar to DNA. The proteins have several roles including breaking into the target cell, assist with virus replication and basically to be a key building block (like a brick in a house) in the whole virus structure.

9/25 The lipids then form a coat around the virus, both for protection and to assist with its spread and cellular invasion. The RNA, proteins, and lipids self-assemble to form the virus. Critically, there are no strong “covalent” bonds holding these units together.

10/25 Instead the viral self-assembly is based on weak “non-covalent” interactions between the proteins, RNA, and lipids. Together these act together like a Velcro so it is very hard to break up the self-assembled viral particle. Still, we can do it (e.g. with soap!).

11/25 Most viruses, including the coronavirus, are between 50-200 nanometers – so they are truly nanoparticles. Nanoparticles have complex interactions with surfaces they are on. Same with viruses. Skin, steel, timber, fabric, paint, and porcelain are very different surfaces.

12/25 When a virus invades a cell, the RNA “hijacks” the cellular machinery like a computer virus (!) and forces the cell to start to makes a lot of fresh copies of its own RNA and the various proteins that make up the virus.

13/25 These new RNA and protein molecules, self-assemble with lipids (usually readily present in the cell) to form new copies of the virus. That is, the virus does not photocopy itself, it makes copies of the building blocks which then self-assemble into new viruses!

14/25 All those new viruses eventually overwhelm the cell and it dies/explodes releasing viruses which then go on to infect more cells. In the lungs, some of these viruses end up in the airways and the mucous membranes surrounding these.

15/25 When you cough, or especially when you sneeze, tiny droplets from the airways can fly up to 10 meters (30 ft)! The larger ones are thought to be main coronavirus carriers and they can go at least 2 m (7 ft). Thus – cover your coughs & sneezes people!

16/25 These tiny droplets end on surfaces and often dry out quickly. But the viruses are still active! What happens next is all about supramolecular chemistry and how self-assembled nanoparticles (like the viruses) interact with their environment!

17/25 Now it is time to introduce a powerful supramolecular chemistry concept that effectively says: similar molecules appear to interact more strongly with each other than dissimilar ones. Wood, fabric and not to mention skin interact fairly strongly with viruses.

18/25 Contrast this with steel, porcelain, and at least some plastics, e.g. Teflon. The surface structure also matters–the flatter the surface the less the virus will “stick” to the surface. Rougher surfaces can actually pull the virus apart.

19/25 So why are surfaces different? The virus is held together by a combination of hydrogen bonds (like those in water) and what we call hydrophilic or “fat-like” interactions. The surface of fibers or wood, for instance, can form a lot of hydrogen bonds with the virus.

20/25 In contrast steel, porcelain or Teflon do not form a lot of hydrogen bonds with the virus. So the virus is not strongly bound to these surfaces. The virus is quite stable on these surfaces whereas it doesn’t stay active for as long on say fabric or wood.

21/25 For how long does the virus stay active? It depends. The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is thought to stay active on favorable surfaces for hours, possibly a day. Moisture (“dissolves”), sunlight (UV light) and heat (molecular motions) all make the virus less stable.

22/25 The skin is an ideal surface for a virus! It is “organic” and the proteins and fatty acids in the dead cells on the surface interact with the virus through both hydrogen bonds and the “fat-like” hydrophilic interactions.

23/25 So when you touch, say, a steel surface with a virus particle on it, it will stick to your skin and hence get transferred onto your hands. But you are not (yet) infected. If you touch your face though, the virus can get transferred from your hands and on to your face.

24/25 And now the virus is dangerously close to the airways and the mucus type membranes in and around your mouth and eyes. So the virus can get in…and voila! You are infected (that is unless your immune system kills the virus).

25/25 If the virus is on your hands you can pass it on by shaking someone’s else hand. Kisses, well, that's pretty obvious…It comes without saying that if someone sneezes right in your face you are kind of stuffed. Part 2 about soap coming next (25 post limit reached)!

26/39 Part 2 about soap, supramolecular chemistry, and viruses. 

So how often do you touch your face? It turns out most people touch the face once every 2-5 minutes! Yeah, so you at high risk once the virus gets on your hands unless you can wash the active virus off.

27/39 So let’s try washing it off with plain water. It might just work. But water “only” competes with the strong “glue-like” interactions between the skin and virus via hydrogen bonds. The virus is quite sticky and may not budge. Water isn’t enough.

28/39 Soapy water is totally different.  Soap contains fat-like substances knowns as amphiphiles, some structurally very similar to the lipids in the virus membrane. The soap molecules “compete” with the lipids in the virus membrane. 

29/39 The soap molecules also compete with a lot of other non-covalent bonds that help the proteins, RNA and the lipids to stick together. The soap is effectively “dissolving” the glue that holds the virus together. Add to that all the water.

30/39 The soap also outcompetes the interactions between the virus and the skin surface. Soon the viruses get detached and fall apart like a house of cards due to the combined action of the soap and water. The virus is gone!

31/39 The skin is quite rough and wrinkly which is why you do need a fair amount of rubbing and soaking to ensure the soap reaches every crook and nanny on the skin surface that could be hiding active viruses.

32/39 Alcohol-based products, which pretty includes all “disinfectants” and “antibacterial” products contain a high-% alcohol solution, typically 60-80% ethanol, sometimes with a bit of isopropanol as well and then water + a bit of soap.

33/39 Ethanol and other alcohols do not only readily form hydrogen bonds with the virus material but as a solvent, are more lipophilic than water. Hence, alcohol does also dissolve the lipid membrane and disrupt other supramolecular interactions in the virus.

34/39 However, you need a fairly high concentration (maybe +60%) of the alcohol to get a rapid dissolution of the virus. Vodka or whiskey (usually 40% ethanol), will not dissolve the virus as quickly. Overall alcohol is not quite as good as soap at this task.

35/39 Nearly all antibacterial products contain alcohol and some soap and this does help killing viruses. But some also include “active” bacterial killing agents, like triclosan. Those, however, do basically nothing to the virus!

36/39 To sum up, viruses are almost like little grease-nanoparticles. They can stay active for many hours on surfaces and then get picked up by touch. They then get to our face and infect us because most of us touch the face quite frequently.

37/39 Water is not very effective alone in washing the virus off our hands. Alcohol-based products work better. But nothing beats soap – the virus detaches from the skin and falls apart very readily in soapy water.

38/39 Here you have it–supramolecular chemistry and nanoscience tell us not only a lot about how the virus self-assembled into a functional active menace but also how we can beat viruses with something as simple as soap.

39/39 Thank you for reading my first thread. Apologies for any mistakes in the above. I might have some virology details wrong here as I am not a virologist unlike @MackayIM who I am a big fan of! But I hope this inspires you not only to use soap but to read up on chemistry!

DAILY WALK CUTS RISK OF DEATH

STUDY: 30 Minute Daily Walk Dramatically Cuts Risk Of Death...https://t.co/MIx1N0mSb4

— NEWS MAKER (@NEWS_MAKER) March 8, 2020