Wednesday, May 1, 2024

[RG911Team] There [was] thousands of tons of 9/11 evidence that the US government didn’t even want their handpicked, cowardly “experts” to see

Posted by at No comments:

Is this a Klaus Schwab Top Ramen?

Posted by at No comments:

Are Christian conservatives about to figure out that the current Netanyahu-run government does not actually like them?

HR 6090 bill would officially define "Antisemitism" so the federal government can sue, prosecute, or sanction more people, businesses, and universities for supposed violations of civil rights law.  --Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk explains, 

In response to campus anti-Israel protests, the House is rushing to to vote on a new bill, HR 6090. This new bill would officially define "Antisemitism" so the federal government can sue, prosecute, or sanction more people, businesses, and universities for supposed violations of civil rights law. 
This bill would make it illegal to compare Israeli policies to Nazi policies. It would make it illegal to describe Israel as racist. It would make it illegal to accuse an American citizen of being more loyal to Israel than to the United States.

But I stand with @RepThomasMassie: This bill is an affront to the Constitution and must not pass.

Where do you think all of the anti-Christian hate in the U.S. and around the world comes from?  It's not the Muslim world.  Nor is it the Arab world.  

When I worked at UPS in the 1980s, I delivered to retail businesses on Wilshire between San Vicente and Fairfax.  In the afternoon on my route for pick-ups in the area, there were often bomb threats with a couple dozen employees standing on the sidewalk milling about.  This was not rare.  It seemed almost weekly to me that at one building or another just east of San Vicente a bomb threat had been declared as evidenced by the crowds on the sidewalk having recently emptied the building.  The Jewish Federation of Los Angeles was located on the north side of Wilshire, and I used to pick up from their office there.  It was on the 3rd, 4th or 6th floor.  Can't recall.  But their office had a woman stationed behind bulletproof glass.  I didn't tap on it to check; it could have been plexiglass for all I knew.  And the sight of it alarmed me to dangers that I certainly was not alert to.  But no bomb was ever detonated.  No one was ever harmed.  Traffic was inconvenienced.  Commerce came to a crawl for about 30 minutes before everybody was ordered to return to their offices.  In retrospect, was the bulletproof glass necessary?  I don't know.  I never heard of anyone going into their offices to shoot up the joint.  Were the bomb threats real?  Who knows?  The frequency of them seemed almost to send a message that the Jewish people were the persecuted tribe of Israel?  Maybe.  Maybe not.  Maybe it's just the reverse.  Maybe.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,

DR. ROBERT MALONE was busy in 2020 writing COVID guidebooks and faking science with famotidine for $21M for DARPA. The OTA contracts for COVID countermeasures were issued by the DOD for about $50B back then.

Here is the direct link to Sasha Latypova's open letter to Dr. Robert Malone.  It is so worth the read.

I never knew you were also an OTA expert! That’s good to know. It would have been even better to know this right around 2020 when you were busy writing COVID guidebooks and faking science with famotidine for $21M for DARPA. The OTA contracts for COVID countermeasures were issued by the DOD for about $50B back then. It would have been great to have you utter some mention of it on Joe Rogan’s or Dark Horse podcast or some other high-profile social media venue to mislead Americans who all thought they were getting safe regulated pharmaceutical products and not unregulated, dangerous, liability-free EUA military countermeasures. Why didn’t you say anything back then? Why didn’t you say anything in the January 16 Doc Malik interview to disprove what I said about the OTA/COVID contracts? What evidence of OTA expertise can you offer other than an angry assertion that you have it? Why did you wait to claim you have expertise in this topic until non-OTA-experts, 
Katherine Watt and I found and reviewed the relevant law and the contracts, and until Debbie Lerman, a journalist and not previously an OTA expert, figured out why and how HHS “partnered” with the DOD to circumvent their respective OTA restrictions? Turns out that was necessary to order a massive volume of “prototypes and demonstrations” (unregulated chemical poison) and pretend these were regulated medicines for military and civilians. Did you know this in 2020?

Here is the chart that shows that the DoD was in charge of Operation Warp Speed, or OWS.  At the right, it reads, "In charge: NSC, DOD, BARDA."


And here is a pic of General Gustave Perna, the Chief Operating Officer of OWS.  We may want to ask ourselves, how do we allow ourselves to be ruled by idiots?  



Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

CLEAN-CUT COMEY, WAR CRIMINAL? On the tortured that Comey approved: waterboarding, the kind that the Japanese used against U.S. soldiers in WWII, and detainees [could have their heads] thrown against a wall up to 30 times

Every branch of government will institute some new rule, new law, or new policy under falsely declared emergencies, in other words, hoaxes, and justify their fascistic actions under that emergency, whether it's COVID, whether America was attacked on 9/11 by outside or domestic forces, or with domestic complicity, whether it incited, declared, and an engaged in a war on terror, they will use emergency powers to seize more government and mass murder. For it needs a trauma to sell the "moral" justification for expansion This is not conjecture. This is not conspiracy. This is not hyperbole. Nor is it hypothetical. The pattern is clear. And if we survive their horrors and read the details of what they pulled to get that power, it only sickens us that they still are walking unshackled.

From James Bovard,

Former FBI chief James Comey compares his courage to Martin Luther - "Here I stand - I can do no other." But Comey saved the Bush-era torture regime & personally approved barbaric interrogation methods including waterboarding & wall slamming. He complains in his memoir that he "lost sleep" over Bush interrogation policies - but that wasn't an option for detainees, since Comey approved forcibly depriving them of sleep for 180 hours straight. https://mises.org/.../james-comey%E2%80%99s-forgotten...

Clean-cut Comey is a war criminal. 

“Here I stand, I can do no other,” James Comey told President George W. Bush in 2004 when Bush pressured Comey - who was then Deputy Attorney General - to approve an unlawful antiterrorist policy.  Comey, who was FBI chief from 2013 to 2017, was quoting a line reputedly uttered by Martin Luther in 1521 when he told Holy Roman Emperor Charles V that he would not recant his sweeping criticisms of the Catholic Church. Comey’s quotation of himself quoting the father of the Reformation is par for the self-reverence of his new memoir, A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies, and Leadership.

The apologies and praise for Comey come from the usual morally depraved stooges in the media.  This time, it's Chris Matthews,

MSNBC host Chris Matthews recently declared, “James Comey made his bones by standing up against torture. He was a made man before Trump came along.” Washington Post columnist Fareed Zakaria, in a column declaring that Americans should be “deeply grateful” to lawyers like Comey, declared, “The Bush administration wanted to claim that its ‘enhanced interrogation techniques’ were lawful. Comey believed they were not... So Comey pushed back as much as he could.”

Comey approved torture but fretted over their optics.

Martin Luther risked death to fight against what he considered the heresies of his time. Comey, a top Bush administration policymaker, found a safer way to oppose the worldwide secret U.S. torture regime widely considered a heresy against American values. Comey approved brutal practices and then wrote some memos and emails fretting about the optics. 

Even after the horrific images of Abu Ghraib were leaked, Comey failed to stop the torture.  Bovard explains that "Rather than ending the abuses, Comey repudiated the memo."  Right, right.  That's the problem--the leaked memo.  That's where the real terrorist threat exists, right, James, and not the murderous Bush policies that you approved and unleashed.

Comey became Deputy Attorney General in late 2003 and “had oversight of the legal justification used to authorize” key Bush programs in the war on terror. At that time, the Bush White House was pushing the Justice Department to again sign off on an array of extreme practices that had begun shortly after the 9/11 attacks. A 2002 Justice Department memo had leaked out that declared that the president was entitled to ignore federal law in approving extreme interrogation techniques. Photos had also leaked from Abu Ghraib prison showing the stacking of naked prisoners with bags over their heads, mock electrocution via a wire connected to a man’s penis, guard dogs on the verge of ripping into naked men, and grinning U.S. male and female soldiers celebrating the bloody degradation. A confidential CIA Inspector General report had just warned that post-9/11 CIA interrogation methods may violate the International Convention Against Torture.

Rather than ending the abuses, Comey repudiated the memo. Speaking to the media in a not-for-attribution session on June 22, 2004, Comey declared that the 2002 memo was “overbroad,” “abstract academic theory,” and “legally unnecessary.” Comey helped oversee crafting a new memo with different legal footing to justify the same interrogation methods.  

What depraved ghouls occupy the federal positions.  As to waterboarding which sought to break detainees with waterboarding, or near-drowning, Comey greenlighted that. 

Comey twice gave explicit approval for waterboarding, which sought to break detainees with near-drowning. This practice had been recognized as a war crime by the U.S. government since the Spanish-American War.

But Comey claims he was losing sleep over Bush's torture policies.  Maybe.  But it seems quite ironic that those same policies refused to allow prisoners to get any sleep at all, using torture to keep them awake for 180 hours straight.  Let's see, how many days is that?  7.5 days. 

Comey wrote in his memoir that he was losing sleep over concern about Bush administration torture policies.  But losing sleep was not an option for detainees because Comey approved sleep deprivation as an interrogation technique. Detainees could be forcibly kept awake for up to 180 hours until they confessed their sins. How did this work? At Abu Ghraib, the notorious Iraqi prison, one FBI agent reported seeing a detainee “handcuffed to a railing with a nylon sack on his head and a shower curtain draped around him, being slapped by a soldier to keep him awake.” 

But Comey had options.  If the optics for waterboarding were untenable, why he also had available to him wall slamming, where detainees were thrown up against a wall 30 times.  Was this before or after sleep deprivation?  But I think Americans were too busy watching 

Comey also approved “wall slamming" --which, as law professor David Cole wrote, meant that detainees could be thrown against a wall up to 30 times. Comey also signed off on the CIA using “interrogation” methods such as facial slaps, locking detainees in small boxes for 18 hours, and forced nudity. When the secret Comey memo approving those methods finally became public in 2009, many Americans were aghast - and relieved that the Obama administration had repudiated Bush policies. 

Yes, the Obama administration repudiated Bush policies, but he failed to prosecute anyone for the crimes listed in the report.  Same as it ever was . . . .

By the way, that "wall slamming" means slamming a detainee's head against a wall.  Nice.  Nice, nice.  A quick aside, David Cole writes that 

The memos’ matter-of-fact clinical descriptions belie the harsh tactics to which they gave a green light. They set the C.I.A. loose to slam suspects’ heads into walls up to 30 times in a row, to deprive suspects of sleep for more than a week straight, to confine them to small dark boxes for hours at a time, to slap them repeatedly in the face and abdomen, and to suffocate them with water to induce the perception that they are drowning. 

As to waterboarding, that's what the Japanese did to American soldiers during WWII,

The United States itself treated waterboarding as torture when the Japanese used it against our troops in World War II. Yet through pages and pages of dense legal reasoning, the Office of Legal Counsel lawyers somehow reach the conclusion that these tactics, even when employed in combination and over a 30-day period, are not torture, and not even cruel, inhuman, or degrading.

Ah, you've got to love official spin by the admin.  

Back to Comey. 

When it came to opposing torture, Comey’s version of “Here I Stand” had more loopholes than a reverse mortgage contract. Though Comey in 2005 approved each of 13 controversial extreme interrogation methods, he objected to combining multiple methods on one detainee. It was as if Martin Luther grudgingly approved of the Catholic Church selling indulgences to individually expunge sins for adultery, robbery, lying, and gluttony but vehemently objected if all the sins were expunged in one lump sum payment.

10 years later, a report is finally released.  Ah, a report!  That's excellent!  That means proof of the criminals including the chain of custody from who approved it, funded it, staffed it, and committed the heinous acts of torture, right?  Ah, not so fast there, Sparky.  Government actors have immunity in almost every government atrocity.  What's sickening, but not surprising, to learn is that "Psychologists aided the torture regime, offering hints on how to destroy the will and resistance of prisoners."  And the only CIA official to go to prison for the torture in Iraq at Abu Ghraib was the guy who outed the program, whistleblower John Kiriakou.

In 2014, the Senate Intelligence Committee finally released a massive report, Americans learned grisly details of the CIA torture regime that Comey helped legally sanctify - including death via hypothermia, rape-like rectal feeding of detainees, compelling detainees to stand long periods on broken legs, and dozens of cases of innocent people pointlessly brutalized. Psychologists aided the torture regime, offering hints on how to destroy the will and resistance of prisoners. The only CIA official to go to prison for the torture scandal was courageous whistleblower John Kiriakou.

Comey did nothing to prevent the torture.  He approved it.  

If Comey had resigned in 2004 or 2005 to protest the torture techniques he now claims to abhor, he would deserve some of the praise he is now receiving. Instead, he remained in the Bush administration but wrote an email summarizing his objections, declaring that “it was my job to protect the department and the A.G. [Attorney General] and that I could not agree to this because it was wrong." A 2009 New York Times analysis noted that Comey and two colleagues “have largely escaped criticism [for approving torture] because they raised questions about interrogation and the law.” In Washington, writing emails is “close enough for government work” to convey sainthood.

Was Comey fired?  Nope. 

Was Comey forced into early retirement?  Nope. 

Was Comey demoted?  Nope.

Did Comey suffer a loss in pay, fined, rendered unfit for office?  No.  No.  And no.  

Well, what happened to him?  What usually happens to government employees when the public finds out about their atrocities?  They get promoted.

When Comey finally exited the Justice Department in August 2005 to become a lavishly-paid senior vice president for Lockheed Martin, he proclaimed in a farewell speech that protecting the Justice Department’s “reservoir” of “trust and credibility” requires “vigilance” and “an unerring commitment to truth.” But Comey perpetuated policies that shattered the moral credibility of both the Justice Department and the U.S. government. Comey failed to heed another Martin Luther admonition: “You are not only responsible for what you say but also for what you do not say.”

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)