And then he wrote a letter. He sat down, and he wrote a letter, in which he said, to a colleague in Boston—he said, you know, “Puerto Rico is beautiful. The weather is incredible. I love the island. However, the problem is with the Puerto Ricans. They’re awful. They steal. They’re filthy. And the thing to do, really, is to totally exterminate the population.” And then he said, “And I’ve started that. I’ve killed eight of my patients, and I’ve sought to transplant cancer into 13 more. Hope you’re doing well in Boston. Yours sincerely,” and just signed off. We know that, because he then left the letter out. It was discovered. It was discovered by the Puerto Rican staff of the hospital where he was working. And it became a national scandal, understandably. Puerto Ricans had heard the scorn of mainlanders. They had heard talk of the problem of Puerto Rican overpopulation and how mainlanders disapproved of it. But here they saw what they interpreted to be the homicidal—racist, homicidal intent from a doctor who had actually killed eight people.

Cornelius Rhoads left. He just fled the island, hoping, presumably, that what happens in San Juan stays in San Juan. The government did an investigation. It uncovered another letter, which the governor deemed worse than the first. But the governor, who was appointed governor—he was a mainlander who had been appointed and not elected—suppressed that letter—we don’t have it, no researcher has ever seen it or found it—and concluded, after having suppressed evidence, that Cornelius Rhoads probably didn’t kill eight of his patients. He was probably just joking or something like that. And Cornelius Rhoads never faced a hearing.

Not only that, he didn’t even get fired. So he returned to New York. He continued his job. He was quickly—he quickly became the vice president of the New York Academy of Medicine. And then, during World War II, he became a colonel in the Army and became the chief medical officer in the Chemical Warfare Service. So, that’s not only a promotion. Just think about what that allows him to do, because the Chemical Warfare Service is preparing the United States to enter a gas war, if it comes to that. So, in order to do that, it tests out all kinds of poison gas, first on animals—goats are preferred—but ultimately on human subjects, on uniformed men, who are, without a lot of informed consent, either having mustard agents applied to their skin to see how their skin blisters, are put in gas chambers with gas masks to see how long they can stay in there—they’re locked in there until they falter—or, in a lot of cases, there’s an island that the United States uses off of Panama, San José Island. And men are put in the field, and they’re asked to sort of stage mock battles. But while they do that, they’re gassed from overhead. And then, you know, this is to see how they’re affected.

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: And interestingly, Professor Immerwahr, there were many Puerto Ricans who served in World War II who ended up stationed in Panama and being subjected to some of the mustard gas experiments that were conducted at that time. I know, because one of my uncles, who served in the 65th Infantry, was in Panama and was subjected to those experiments. So, the interesting thing, though, is that Cornelius Rhoads remained a major figure—didn’t he?—in the medical world, and way up into only recently. Only in recent years has there been an attempt to sort of revise or reform the image of him in the medical community.

DANIEL IMMERWAHR: That’s exactly right. So, after overseeing these medical experiments with gas, in which 60,000 uniformed men, a lot of them Puerto Rican, were subjected, without informed consent, to chemical weapons. And many of them suffered debilitating effects as a result of this—emphysema, eye damage, genital scarring, psychological damage. Some of these men were really harmed by this. Nevertheless, that also didn’t impede him. And, in fact, some of that work with chemical agents alerted him, as well as some other doctors, to the possibility that mustard agents could be used to treat cancer. Cornelius Rhoads took some of the surplus stock of U.S. chemical weapons after the war and became the first director of the Sloan Kettering Institute and then used his position to sort of launch the, you know, turn to chemotherapy and tried chemical after chemical after chemical out on fighting cancer.

The incredible thing is that, within the U.S. medical community, that’s what he was remembered for. He appeared on the cover of Time magazine. There was an award given by the American Association of Cancer Research after Cornelius Rhoads, and that award was given for more than 20 years, before a Puerto Rican cancer researcher pointed out to the AACR, “You know the guy, after whom this award is named, the hero, Cornelius Rhoads? You know what he did in Puerto Rico?” And it had been 23 years. The informational segregation had been so extraordinary that it had been 23 years before the mainland medical community realized that the guy that they had been enthusiastically celebrating had at least said in a letter that he had killed eight of his patients.

AMY GOODMAN: And the statue of Cornelius Rhoads at 103rd and 5th Avenue was removed.

CHASE HUGHES: Whatever gets rewarded gets repeated. Whatever gets ignored disappears. So people adopt. They simplify themselves. They exaggerate themselves. They flatten their entire personality into something that's sharable. So they become more extreme, more predictable, more performative.

You feel engaged, you feel aware, you feel more mature but nothing ever resolves because resolution ends the engagement cycle.  --Chase Hughes

   

We Are Livestock. It Was All a Lie.

Thank you to Mindy Esposito for bringing this to my attention.

00:07.  What people call reality it's all fake.  This is not a metaphor, this is reality being replaced layer by layer.  There are 6 layers, and you've only seen the first one.

Reality.  You used to be grounded in direct experience.  You lived through it.  But now, reality is mediated.  You don't experience events anymore.  You experience coverage, pre-framed interpretations of ideas, avatars, personality, costumes, personas, and masks.  

YOU'RE LIVING INSIDE OF A SYMBOLIC LAYER

A headline starts replacing understanding.  A brand replaces identity.  A political label replaces a human being.  You're not living inside of reality.  You're living inside of a symbolic layer.  If symbols become dominant, truth becomes optional because truth doesn't need to be accurate anymore.  It just needs to be repeatable, emotionally charged, recognizable, and socially enforced.  That is the simulation.  

1:40.  Brands figured this out first because we don't buy products we buy a story of ourselves.  So that's a word that you hear constantly,  "brand,"and it comes from the old Norse word "brandr," and it means to burn.  Specifically, it means to burn a permanent mark into livestock.  So ownership is obvious and sorting animals out is easy.  You are being branded by advertisers, political narratives.  The system knows what you're going to react to, what you're going to defend, what you're going to buy, and who you're going to hate.  So Layer #1 is mediated reality. 

LAYER #1: MEDIATED REALITY 

This is why the world feels off.  It feels theatrical, overacted, scripted, predictable, because it is.  Empires figured this out thousands of years ago.  If you control the symbols, you just need to control what people react to.  People have to adopt the symbols.  Now we are shaped by metrics and algorithms and visibility approval signals there's a very secret name for what all these things are, and they are called "conditioning signals."  Whatever gets rewarded gets repeated. Whatever gets ignored disappears.  So people adopt.  They simplify themselves.  They exaggerate themselves.  They flatten their entire personality into something that's sharable.  So they become more extreme, more predictable, more performative.  So people aren't asking, "Is this how I feel?"  They're asking, "How will this be perceived by other people?" And over time, something breaks.  Because when your external performance doesn't match your internal experience, there is one universal response: we feel hollow.  This is the death of authenticity.  Which brings us to Layer #2: Human Conditioning.  

LAYER #2: HUMAN CONDITIONING

Once this is in place training replaces learning and they do this through algorithm reinforcement, repeated narratives, emotional escalation, social punishment, visibility rewards.  Information has to change shape because information creates understanding.  So the system replaces information with content.  And this brings us to Layer 3: the collapse of information.

LAYER #3: COLLAPSE OF INFORMATION

4:27.  What's the difference between information and content?  Information answers questions.  Content stimulates responses.

4:38.  Most of what fills your feed is not meant to be important.  It is meant to occupy attention, trigger emotion, maintain your engagement, and prevent Silence from entering your life.  Because silence is worth thinking happens.  This is why everything feels urgent.  You feel engaged, you feel aware, you feel more mature but nothing ever resolves because resolution ends the engagement cycle.  It's designed to make you feel like you're participating in it. Which brings us to Layer #4: Fear and Identity Control.  

LAYER #4: FEAR & IDENTITY CONTROL  

Humans evolved to survive in small groups, where exclusion meant death.  That wiring has never changed.  Belonging used to come from family and tribe and shared work with other people, but now it comes from follower accounts and group identities in digital approval.  So conformity is enforced with social threat.  You're quietly warned and you're shown that not reacting might be suspicious.  Questioning the frame is dangerous so people react publicly.  Why?  Fear of ostracism.  The fear of being labeled, being seen as one of them. It's constant in the background of everything. And that is not accidental.  And obviously social media didn't invent fear, but it multiplied it by orders of magnitude.  And here's why. Fear scales engagement better than any other emotion.  It speeds reaction.  It reduces nuance.  It increases sharing, and it locks your memory in place. So the system learns, it tracks what spikes your heart rate, what makes you comment, and what makes you argue, what makes you pissed off, and it feeds you more of that s***.  Every post is a potential punishment that we're dealing with hate, panic, fear, and anger become advertising products.  The longer you stay emotionally activated, the more valuable you become in real dollars.  Fear has to be sustained.  

7:02.  A stable identity does something dangerous.  It resists manipulation but the system is very clever.  You're kept in a constant state of morally emergency every week There's a new crisis, a new outrage, some new villain that's prepackaged for you, a new law being passed, a new line that you're expected to know.  It creates what looks like clarity but it isn't.  Something detonates emotionally that is immediately buried by the next thing.  That's identity fragmentation.  When people don't have time to form their values slowly, they accept a prepackaged moral frame these are ready-made positions, approved language, approved emotions, approved enemies.  Morality stops being something that we develop and it becomes something that we display.  Signaling replaces moral reasoning.  Virtue becomes a lapel pin.  Ethics become performative.  Believe becomes a freaking costume.  And once morality is externalized like that, it's easy to control because it's a simulation.  It's fake.  It can be updated remotely.  You can see it in how fast people switch positions.  And it's not because they learned some new information.  It's just because the frame got changed.  And here's the most unsettling part, as if the other ones weren't.  People start to feel relief when morality is handed to them because it removes responsibility.  They don't have to think.  They just have to align, and alignment feels safe when fear is everywhere.  If identity and morality are programmable, division of human beings becomes super easy.  And that all comes down to one huge manipulation tool.  

This is Layer #5: Narrative Warfare.  

LAYER #5: NARRATIVE WARFARE  

So modern news is not here to report on reality it's designed to completely and totally construct narrative frames it decides who's a victim who's righteous and what questions are followed the facts are completely optional so here's the mechanism an event happens immediately the story arrives fully formed and you're told how to feel who to blame what it means and which side you're on and all this happens before you have time to think facts don't radicalize people narratives do because narratives come with Heroes and enemies and moral certainty and urgency in full-blown permission to hate people one detail gets Amplified another gets buried contacts gets removed until complexity completely disappears new ones is always a first casualty here because new ones slows reaction time and reaction is the product this is how deliberate demonization works you don't argue with the other side you just dehumanize them they're not human

PIERCE COUNTY SHERIFF KEITH SWANK: I don't recognize your Authority to impose these controls over me, and when you try to remove me from Office thousands of Pierce County residents will surround the County's City Building in downtown Tacoma and will not allow that to happen.

How civil wars begin https://t.co/cO4lq07J3L

— EM Burlingame - 蒲 奕 言 (@EMBurlingame) January 18, 2026

Manka Dhingra, U.S. Senator from Washington state could be out of her jurisdiction of Mumbai.  

Pierce County Sheriff Keith Swank is the be exemplary law officer.

Some of my colleagues naively believe that they can come here and reason with you.  They don't understand what's at stake here.  They don't understand you like I do.  You're going to pass this qualification bill for law enforcement but you won't hold yourselves accountable.  Therefore, I propose everyone who runs for an elected office go through a background check, a social media review, a polygraph, a psychological test, but Democrats you want to agree to that because you have convicted felons who are elected officials here.  I represent almost a million people, more than all of you combined here, many more people.  I was an elected Chief of Police.  Being Sheriff of Pierce County is much more than police work.  Citizens reach out to me all the time regarding overreach of the government by you.  Some say they finally have a voice because of me, and you want to silence it because I said transgender women are men.  I said the truth. You want to give unelected bureaucracy the ability to decertify me and remove me from elected office because you don't agree with my speech.  Just for the record, my deputies don't wear masks but once you pass this law that they can't, I will not only allow them but I will encourage them to do so just to see what you do.  I don't recognize your Authority to impose these controls over me, and when you try to remove me from Office thousands of Pierce County residents will surround the County's City Building in downtown Tacoma and will not allow that to happen.  I hope it doesn't come to that, but I and they are prepared.  Finally, anyone who votes for this will not have an audience with this Sheriff.

CHASE HUGHES: Shame today is institutionalized. It's a public weapon to use shame.

How we metaphorize maturity with ownership.  If someone makes fun of you online, like own it, or if you did something wrong and you get caught, like own up to it.  What's going on there?  

When it comes to owning things, you can own it with shame.  You can own it with fear.  You can own it with obligation.  You can own it with guilt.  Those are like the big four: shame, fear, obligation, guilt.  Or you can own it with just "it is what it is," and see yourself as a fact instead of all the other people.  Like those are layers of how we see people.  Can . . . am I able to see myself as a fact?  Like well that's just what happened.  It's just something that happened. I'll definitely work to make this better in the future.  I'm in charge of the future.  I'm not in charge of the past right now.  But once you get to that delusional self forgiving, you get into the mode of viewing life almost not in a bizarre way but like a video game, like, "Well that sucked.  Let's try to do better this next week or next month."  And if I treat it like it's a video game and still I'm good to people, I'm good natured, I have great intentions, I'm not hurting anybody, I'm not trying to hurt anybody, then I think we tend to enjoy our lives more.

More on shame.

The fastest way to read a human being, number one way, is to keep one question in your head.  It is "What does this person want me to feel about them and what do they want me to notice?" because everyone wears some kind of a mask.  The mask is made up of the things that this person built to conceal shame.  And shame today is institutionalized.  It's a public weapon to use shame.  So shame creates cognitive dissonance, which is a mental discomfort. Mental discomfort says, "I don't want to be this uncomfortable in front of people."  That creates a mask.  So we wear these personas in these masks to cover up something.

DOLORES CAHILL: Second highest crime [in England] below treason [is] called malfeasance. It's reserved for men and women that dress up as police and judges and coroners and members of parliament who . . . misrepresent the law by making one of your inalienable rights . . . a criminal offense

"The COVID-19 thing and the PCR testing and the masks were really a test to see how far have they have removed people from the knowledge of the law that they would actually accept that people would say you have to wear a mask or you can't travel for 5 miles."

Dolores Cahill, a… pic.twitter.com/FdzstVCFua

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) November 26, 2024

The COVID-19 thing and the PCR testing and the masks were really a test to see how far have they have removed people from the knowledge of the law that they would actually accept that people would say you have to wear a mask or you can't travel for 5 miles."

Dolores Cahill, a professor, immunologist, and inventor, describes for an audience at Sounds Beautiful Fest 2024 how the COVID-19 operation was, in part, a test to see how far the general population's knowledge of their rights as enshrined by natural law has been diminished. Cahill notes that any police officers, nurses, coroners, etc. who have violated people's rights as enshrined by natural law must now face jury trials; "precedence" examples are particularly important, Cahill notes, as that will deter bad actors in these key professions from committing malfeasance in the future. Partial transcription of clip below. "So what's happening is we have people dressed up as police, so they are paid to defend our right to life, our freedom of travel, our freedom of speech, privacy, and property. So what the system that's been around, you know, to try and push this legal system on is the COVID-19 thing and the PCR testing and the masks were really a test to see how far have they removed people from the knowledge of the law that they would actually accept that people would say you have to wear a mask or you can't travel for 5 miles. And then the strategy was, well, if 95% of the population do it willingly, that then they will just go and target the small number of people that,  you know, were standing up. And that's why we were organizing big rallies in the World Freedom Alliance and in England as all of you were so that if a million people turned up, that would make it more difficult. "But what people don't know is really don't, you know, don't appreciate is that the people who are paid as police constables in England are paid to defend our right to life, travel, speech, privacy, and property. But then there's actually a criminal offense in England today. It's the second highest crime below treason, and it's called malfeasance. And it's reserved for men and women that dress up as police and judges and coroners and members of parliament who actually misrepresent the law by making one of your inalienable rights, for example, a criminal offense, like 10 years in prison. "And then it may take us a number of years to hold them accountable, and the solution is this trial by jury system. But to set up a trial by jury system, you need tens of thousands of people. And that partly what I'm proposing and what a lot of us are proposing is that we run the knowledge of the trial by jury through local co op groups or PMA groups so that if we educate 10, 20 people, you can go back to your community groups and educate tens of thousands of people and then maybe volunteer for a lawful trial by jury, which will then hold a precedence case like a coroner or whatever accountable. Does that make sense? So that's so I think what has been going on and we, you know, don't need to go into it too much, but it's just that the the solution is really this accountability mechanism. "Now while solutions like growing food and detoxing are all very important and developing homeschools, This is kind of a fundamental thing that we don't want this to happen again. And all societies that have crumbled over millennia are that there was some kind of element of coercion through food supply or through slavery or tyranny so that they could enslave the majority of people and then strategically target the individuals standing up. So part of the solution for us is to work together and then put the spotlight back on them and we all then look strategically potentially between the 4 nations, for example, coroners or example, people paid as nurses or paid as police that would be precedence examples."

DEAR W.H.O.: What the heck are you doing? Why are you now recommending masks? Forever you have been not recommending masks for use in the general public because you've admitted there are dangers associated with that

They are doing it again Dennis! https://t.co/2MIhRuHrYz

— Dr. Janci (@JanciToxDoc) October 14, 2024

The masks collect and gather all kinds of pathogen-laden materials near your face eyes and nose and everything.  And then you touch the mask the mask and then you touch the rest of your body.  And so it was thought that there was danger associated with that concentration of pathogens.  And that's why the main World Health Organization did not recommend mask use in a general population is that potentially it was believed to be a dangerous thing making matters worse.  Evidence from 14 randomized control trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory confirmed influenza.  We similarly found limited evidence on the effectiveness of improved hygiene and environmental cleaning so here's the latest best study in a sense that uses only these very biased-free studies that says look, it doesn't matter if you sanitize surfaces, it doesn't matter if you're washing your hands and masks don't work that's what science tells us and there's good reason for that the reason is that we know and we have known for a decade now that the main transmission route of all o. these types of viral respiratory diseases is very fine aerosol particles that are supported as part of a fluid air.  With those kinds of particles, they're going to get through the sides of the mask.  Even the tiny wrinkles you have on your skin, there is no way you can prevent these aerosol particles from either entering or coming out.  So masks are not going to work under these circumstances but the top scientists have known as forever.  

ROMAN BYSTRIANYK: This tells us that other societal and personal health factors are the most important – not any microbe.

We are still stuck in the idea of the “out there” something (bacteria, virus, etc.) we encounter, and then we get sick and die. No other factors are really ever considered, and the solution has been to use vaccines, masks, isolation, etc., to protect us from this outside enemy.… pic.twitter.com/jzVCJu7TSn

— Roman Bystrianyk (@RBystrianyk) July 31, 2024

We are still stuck in the idea of the “out there” something (bacteria, virus, etc.) we encounter, and then we get sick and die. No other factors are really ever considered, and the solution has been to use vaccines, masks, isolation, etc., to protect us from this outside enemy. Yet, the data show a decline in deaths by nearly 100% with or without a vaccine for all infectious diseases from the mid-1800s to the mid-1900s. This tells us that other societal and personal health factors are the most important – not any microbe. We don’t need to be protected; we must work towards health – whole foods, clean drinks, exercise, sunshine, destressing, etc. It’s like we are stuck in Newtonian physics despite the discovery of Einstein’s relativity and quantum mechanics. Many doctors in the later 1800s and early 1900s understood this, but they were overrun by the PPP of medical men – Profits, Prestige, and Power. 

DR. HARVEY RISCH: [T]his military approach that had people in the military underneath the National Security Council, designed a response that all of our government agencies would carry out, they designed a response that would not follow public health principles

🔥"people in the mid and upper-middle levels of all these agencies...[were] brainwashed by upper-levels of our military establishment that are the professional brainwashers, because that's who the National Security Council pulled in to do the professional brainwashing..." (1/6)… pic.twitter.com/a6BlEZjpbE

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) May 6, 2024

People in the mid and upper-middle levels of all these agencies...[were] brainwashed by upper-levels of our military establishment that are the professional brainwashers, because that's who the National Security Council pulled in to do the professional brainwashing..." (1/6)

Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology at Yale Dr. Harvey Risch (

@DrHarveyRisch

) describes for Jason James (

@jasonjamesbnn

) how the "upper-levels of [the U.S.] military establishment" brainwashed the government, as well as the American people, into believing that things like lockdowns, masking, and the mRNA injections were necessary to defeat COVID. He highlights the fact that the National Security Council (NSC) took control of the "pandemic" response in the U.S. just seven days after it was declared a national emergency, and, echoing the work done by Sasha Latypova (

@sasha_latypova

) and Katherine Watt, says that the FDA's supposed approval of the COVID injections was pure "theater." "[W]hat happened...during the pandemic, is that...FDA, NIH, CDC, all of them, lost control of what would have been their scientific narratives. And they did that because...President Trump...handed [management of the 'pandemic'] off to the National Security Council, which militarized it, which made the pandemic no longer a pandemic, but a biowarfare attack," Risch tells James. The professor emeritus adds that the COVID injections are "not vaccines according to the government" and are, instead, "countermeasures, because it's a military approach that was adopted rather than a public health approach." "[T]his military approach that had people in the military underneath the National Security Council, designed a response that all of our government agencies would carry out, they designed a response that would not follow public health principles," Risch notes. Prior to the NSC's bizarre and harmful "pandemic" response plan, Risch says that prominent public health officials had said that "you don't lock down the population" and that "there's no point in closing airports [as] that won't do anything." He adds that public health officials also knew that "masks are essentially useless—for either protecting the wearer or for controlling source control, meaning keeping the wearer from spreading infection outside of the wearer." "[A]ll of this stuff was all laid out, and then the military turned it around and did the opposite of almost everything. And so, that colored our whole response," Risch says. Explaining further, the Yale professor says that "people in the mid and upper-middle levels of all these [U.S. government] agencies...[were] brainwashed by upper-levels of our military establishment that are the professional brainwashers, because that's who the National Security Council pulled in to do the professional brainwashing..." Risch goes on to say: "What happened is that, basically, your rank-and-file people in the mid and upper-middle levels of all these agencies, are relatively good people who believe in themselves, they believe in the science the way they see it; they believe that they think they are doing a good job, the best that they could under the circumstances, they think of themselves as wholesome, good-doing people. And they [didn't] realize that they [were being] brainwashed. That [they'd] been brainwashed by upper-levels of our military establishment that are the professional brainwashers, because that's who the National Security Council pulled in to do the professional brainwashing of all of our scientific, medical regulatory systems, as well as the general public. And we know how much brainwashing has gone on through the media and all that." "[T]his whole regime of mis-thinking, of propagandized fear and lack of recognition of what were the true issues going on, spread throughout the regulatory approval and scientific review institutions of our government," Risch adds. Touching on the topic of the COVID injections, Risch says that the FDA's VIRBAC (Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee) committee, "thought they were doing good by approving vaccines," but were, in fact, "essentially irrelevant." Risch adds that "It was just theater to legitimize that these vaccines weren't vaccines, they were countermeasures and were going to be used anyway come hell or high water, because that's what the military at the top, the National Security Council, had decided, in advance of this whole process unfolding." Indeed, Risch highlights the fact that the COVID injection rollout "was planned this way" and notes that "the military was involved in Event 201, the planning...sessions in September of 2019, and all the previous Event 201s..." that had taken place regularly in the years leading up to COVID. "Why was the military involved? Because they knew the likelihood of a bioweapons attack was grossly, much larger, much higher, than a spread from some animal reservoir into humans. So they were heavily involved in the planning for this and it shows how we carried out all of the pandemic management. Because it was obviously twisted and contorted to be a military response rather than a public health response.

HATECRAFT TO ACCOMPLISH THE POLITICS OF COMPLIANCE

Watch this phenomenal presentation by James Lindsey @ConceptualJames on the The politics of Compliance: The target is You!

Presented at ICS at CPAC pic.twitter.com/g5n1p2YFrO

— Edward Dowd (@DowdEdward) February 28, 2024

00:25. A quote from a lesser known dictator and that's Mao Zedong.  In 1957, he not so famously said, "Not to have correct political opinions is like not having a soul."  And I think that that is kind of a banner for the lives that we've been living for the last few years and that's very unfortunate but it's also very telling.  My talk is titled, "The Target Is You."  What I want to talk about is actually "The Politics of Compliance" is the name I've given this and it's actually derived from a strategy that Mao Zedong used, but to make the politics of compliance work the target is actually you.  And I don't just mean you with the wrong political opinions who don't have souls.  I mean everybody.  There are generally three categories of people when it comes to the politics of compliance: 1) there are the people who are complying; 2) there are the people who are refusing, and 3) there are the people who aren't sure.  And all three are targeted by the politics of compliance roughly the same way with the same Dynamic the goal is of course to get the compliant to feel better than everybody else but also frustrated with everybody else it is to convince those who are not sure to join the programming to begin to comply and it is to use the people who refuse to comply as the wedge around which the entire thing turns.  In fact, it's to dehumanize them and motivate the other two groups to try to destroy them.  So Mao Zedong simply took over China with a very small number of conceptual concepts that I'm lumping together in what I'm calling the politics of compliance.  He separated the population into two broad categories I just mentioned.  I just mentioned three, well he cut it into two.  It was an oversimplification, and those two categories are the people, and the enemies of the people.  Not to put too fine a point on it, that's what he called them: the people and the enemies of the people. And what he said is who are the people?  Well, he gives this kind of historical record in 1957 as to who counted as the people, and when.  And there's a consistent running theme through his 8 or 9 different examples of different historical periods of the Chinese story, whether it's the Japanese or the Sino-Japanese War, the second one, whether it's the period of building socialism after he took power in 1949, whether it's during his 1st, 2nd, or 3rd-Year Plan, and the examples all have the single theme of THE people are the people who agree with Mao, and THE ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE are the people who don't agree with Mao.  And it turns out to be really that simple the people at the period of building socialism are those who support the building of socialism and the enemies of the people are those who resist the building of socialism.  He says it explicitly that clearly.  

3:20. And this sets up a dynamic I think the best name for it is Hatecraft, and here is how it works.  The goal of this split is to say that there is a correct perspective on all things, a sacred science (see #5), as Robert [Jay] Lifton described it, and that's called The People's perspective, or at least it was in China.  We could call it whatever, "the critical race perspective on Race"; we could call it "the queer perspective on sexual politics"; we could all imagine a bunch of examples under COVID, "the public health perspective," I guess would be the right name for it.  I see Red Hats in the crowd, you're not allowed to have those.  That's the deplorable side of a different perspective.  But this is the general idea.  There are people who do the right thing.  There are people who do the wrong thing, and the goal is to bring people into the people's perspective, which is also called agreeing with the tyranny.  

4:10. And what you do in order to achieve this idea is that you separate the population into two broad categories, The People and The Enemies of the People.  And then you say,

What we want is unity.  We want Unity but there are certain elements in the population who are preventing us from unity and moving into the future that we can be having, and it's their fault.  The people want to move forward, and the enemy of the people is stopping them.  The people want to open their businesses and go back about their lives, but the people who won't wear masks or take a shot or socially distance or close down their lives or whatever else in the COVID department, are stopping them.  We want to open the country back up, but we can't because there are anti-vaxxers.  They are the problem.

That is hatecraft.

MUST-LISTEN: Audio: Hero Nurse Records Hospital Officials Violating Their Own Policy, The Nuremberg Code and The Law.

MUST-LISTEN.  Nurse Kim Carter recorded her termination meeting on November 2nd, 2023 with Select Medical Hospital in Cincinnati Ohio for mask refusal and enforcement.  

SUMMARY

Kim is not jabbed and knows the harms of the masks and the shots, regardless of the type of shot. She has warned her co-workers, including Dean Blevins (CEO), Lauren Alexander (Human Resources Director), and Jennifer Dreher (APRN, CNO.) well in advance. Kim also submitted her religious exemption to them with peer-reviewed, referenced, proof of harm. Her religious exemption was denied.

Kim was sent home on Monday, October 30th, 2023, and then returned to work on Thursday, November 2nd, 2023. This was the date of the meeting and the recording.

Kim learned of the recent FDA safety signal (regarding the taking of both the COVID shot and the Flu shot), which dropped on the 29th of October, then she warned them on the 30th, the next day. Kim has always warned her co-workers about the harm of masks and shots, and how informed consent is not being given to the patients or the employees.

As a House Shift Supervisor, she was told to enforce Select Medical’s reimplemented mask policy for those who have not taken a flu shot. Their policy is that if you take the flu shot, you don’t need to wear a mask. If you don’t take the flu shot, you have to wear a mask and force others to do so.

Kim refused, based on religious beliefs and medical facts.

They sent Kim home to silence her. Then, she went back on the 2nd of November and they used her religious beliefs about the mask to further silence her, then they terminated her on Friday, November 3rd of 2023.

In this meeting on November 2nd, 2023, Kim was in a room with Dean Blevins (the CEO), Lauren Alexander (Human Resources Director), and Jennifer Dreher, APRN, CNO (the lady on the phone in the recording).

Kim recorded this meeting.

Above is her recording.

Kim is a friend of mine, a mother, and a patriot of the highest order. She has witnessed atrocities at former hospitals where she’s worked and former nursing homes as well, specifically from 2020 up to the current day.

If you can assist Kim in her legal battle, with any legal referrals or legal advice, please reach out to me at:  americaneducationfm@protonmail.com.  

TRANSCRIPT

1:38. So we just wanted to follow up from our last conversation and make sure you're doing okay, and then kind of go from there.  [Insincere: trying to disarm his audience]

1:46. We wanted to touch base with you before you got here.  We left you a voicemail . . . [Getting to business; tries to establish authority in conversation]

1:50. Yeah, I don't know what happened with that [questioning & indicting his intentions]  

1:51. That's okay [Bevins trying to buy back some creds with her; he's failing and flailing]

1:59. How are you feeling.

2:00. I'm still very concerned and I don't know how to make that and I don't know how to make that concern go away because those are significant safety signals I don't know how I'm supposed to feel I feel the way that I feel.

2:18. So I guess from my standpoint my question to you is do you think that you're able to lead the floor as a house supervisor?  Like knowing what you know, knowing where our patients are at, knowing where our staff is at [with] enforcing the mask with the people that don't have the flu shot, do you feel that you're able to leave the floor?

2:45. That's what I've been doing I mean and I'm not going to enforce a mask when I don't know what their religious standpoint is or what their medical standpoint is that's none of my business that's a HIPAA thing.

2:58. But that's a job requirement as a leader.

3:00. You are too enforce the mask when you know that people don't have the vaccine.

3:06. But I don't know because it's medical information that I'm not privy to

3:12. We provide a list of the house supervisor . . . 

3:13. So you're violating people's Medical information

3:17. We don't know what they're

3:18. If you're giving me a list, you're providing me with your personal medical information.  You're violating HIPAA.

3:23. We're following our select policy

3:24. And your select policy is violating your own corporate policy I mean I don't know what you guys want me to do but you're asking me to break the law and I'm not okay with that.

3:35. I just told you what we want . . . 

3:35. So you're asking me to break the law

3:37. We're not breaking the law.

3:38. You are breaking the law . . .

3:39. We're following our policies from slot[?]

3:40. And HIPAA is very clear, and you're breaking HIPPA. 

3:48. No because every leader gets [a list of] who is vaccinated who isn't vaccinated every hospital.

3:50.  But that is not . . . that is their medical history.  Providing somebody with a medical procedure is medical history.

3:58. Kim, we're not going to continue to do this, like this is everywhere, every hospital, every leadership team you get how many people are vaccinated, what vaccination they have, what they're getting, and we have to enforce on the floor our policy.  Our policy is that you wear a mask if you do not have the flu vaccine.

4:16. Okay well I've already given you guys my religious beliefs and my religious exemption and that's where I stand.  I don't know what anybody else is medical status is.

4:26. I wasn't submitting that to you because I was looking for acceptance.  You, you have no right to accept or deny my religious beliefs. You have no right.

Bill Gates & Globalists Wanted to Vaccinate 7 Billion People Worldwide. If It Weren't for the Russians, They May Might Have Achieved Their Objective.

The globalists fully planned on holding all the cards and having full control over this system and the fact that the Russians played along and launched their vaccine first completely collapsed this agenda. 

Episode #349 - Tom Luongo & Alex Krainer https://t.co/pwk7Tf8ueI

— Shaun Newman Podcast (@SNewmanPodcast) December 1, 2022

Tom Luongo and Alex Krainer provide terrific insights on global players, their advantages, disadvantages, and how their respective histories play a role in how they're position themselves against their people and challengers, their competing strategies, etc.  

2:55  Alex says he doesn't know what going on with China--their lockdowns, zero COVID policies, quarantine camps, etc.--he says because he does know that the west is flush with disinformation and misinformation about China.  Says that a lot of the information is coming through the Epoch Times.  Journalists are quoting Epoch Times at face value.  Epoch times is controlled by Falun Gang, which is extremely anti-Chinese Communist Party, or CCP.  Says he can't trust them.  He's been trying to follow actual, genuine Chinese sources, and several westerners who live in China, and what I'm gathering from then is that things are not at all the way that things are being presented in the western media.  What's going on with the zero COVID policy, not sure, but the policy is stupid or it's about something else.  He was surprised to see Russia fall lockstep in line with the World Health Organization, and Bill Gates, and everybody, and take this COVID thing at face value, seriously--do the lockdowns, the masks, the vaccines, everything as the WHO dictated.  You already had the president of Belarus, Lukashenko, who said, "This is all bullshit.  We're not doing this."  At intelligence services, Russia and Belarus are quite tight.  So what was the Russian game?  It became clear the day they launched their Sputnik V vaccine, the first one to launch in the whole world.  The Russians were the first, and they made it immediately available to the whole world.  They gave other countries permission to produce it if 

5:55  The vaccines themselves are secondary.  More importantly, the vaccine was supposed to be the stepping stone toward the COVID passports, which were supposed to be universal.  Look at what Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates have said.  They fully planned on having monopolies on the vaccines.  So western pharmaceutical companies were going to have a monopoly, and they were going to vaccinate 7 billion people.  Remember Bill Gates saying, "Nothing is going to return to normal until 7 billion people get vaccinated."  That would have meant 7 billion vaccine certificates linked to Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, etc.  Once you have the vaccine certificates in place, there's a whole other administration and bureaucracy, IT administration of these rules.  Monopolies over the vaccines would also give them administration over the system.  

Now, if countries adopted Sputnik V, the Russian vaccine, that completely throws a spanner into the globalists' pandemic agenda because now they either have to include Russians in the administration of this system, or they have to give up control over the countries that opt for Sputnik V.  Now, you no longer have monopoly.  What the hell do you do now?  Had the Russians not played along and taken the whole thing seriously, . . . had they said, "No, no, no, we're not buying this.  This is a hoax," then their Sputnik V vaccine wouldn't have been credible.  "Wait, you have a vaccine, but you said the whole thing was a hoax?"  So the Russians had to play along, be part of the system in order to throw a spanner [British for wrench] into it, because it's not just whether you or I couldn't get onto a plane or go into a pub or into a theater, it's much bigger than that because that system you could use to destabilize governments, to trigger social uprisings, you could use it in all kinds of nefarious ways once you have power to control whether in some countries people may travel. people may leave their homes, people may go to work, children may go to school, and so forth.  The globalists fully planned on holding all the cards and having full control over this system and the fact that the Russians played along and launched their vaccine first completely collapsed this agenda.  That's how I work out the Russian agenda.  I don't know how to work out the Chinese agenda.  It's way out there.  

10:03  Krainer thinks that the zero COVID policy in China may be a ruse to shake out foreigners out of China.  This is such heavy-handed harassment that I know people who've said, like, "Okay, enough.  We're packing up.  We're leaving China.  We're not going to live here." It's not zero COVID, because zero COVID is an impossible objective.  

11:00  When Sputnik V was announced, Tom called it the biggest geopolitical tool.  

"Lockdown Moderate" and Parent Guru, Emily Oster, Calls for Americans to Forgive the CDC, the FDA, County Health Officers, Governors, Fauci, Birx, Collins, Gottlieb, Bourla, et al. Sorry, Sister. Never Forget. Never Forgive. Hold the Line.

NEW - The Atlantic publishes a call for amnesty rather than accountability for what has been done to people during the pandemic. pic.twitter.com/sK3TYOxPBC

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) October 31, 2022

Don't make me laugh.  The answer is NO.

The author's name is Professor Emily Oster, a woman who writes about pregnancy and parenthood.  And here she is to tell us to forgive what Fauci, Collins, Scarf-Lady Debra Birx, Scott Gottlieb, your local county health officer in tandem with your governor told us to isolate, to social distance, wear a panty on your face, prevent you from dining out, effectively locking up your elderly grandmother or parent in a convalescent home before killing them.  Yeah, right, Emily, oh, such a pretty Victorian name Emily.

Eugyppius calls her out: Professor Oster is a "lockdown moderate."  Oh, how compromising.  Problem is that she's compromising your health and the nation's economic health.  

I don’t know much about the American pandemic pundits, but I gather that Brown University economist and “parenting guru” Emily Oster is far from the worst of them. Her Twitter timeline suggests she spent the early months of the pandemic terrified about the virus until school closures took their toll on her kids, at which point she repositioned herself as a kind of lockdown moderate, opposing the worst of the hystericist excesses while validating their central premises whenever possible to save face with friends and colleagues.

My unpopular opinion of the day is that I think we may be reaching the limits of fear-based vaccine motivation. And there are downsides to continuing to sow fear among those who are already afraid.

What might work?

-Full FDA approval
-Employer mandates

— ProfEmilyOster (@ProfEmilyOster) July 14, 2021

Oh, I love this, Emily.  Why don't you retreat to your downtown townhome far away from the rest of civilized, real working people, huh? 

Emily Oster’s latest act of moderation is the suggestion that we forgive and forget all the disastrous policies inflicted on us by terrified wealthy urbanites, clueless technocrats and mad scientist vaccinators since 2020, because, hey, these were just honest mistakes, anybody could’ve messed up like that, it’s all good.

April 2020, with nothing else to do, my family took an enormous number of hikes. We all wore cloth masks that I had made myself. We had a family hand signal, which the person in the front would use if someone was approaching on the trail and we needed to put on our masks.  Once, when another child got too close to my then-4-year-old son on a bridge, he yelled at her “SOCIAL DISTANCING!”

These precautions were totally misguided. In April 2020, no one got the coronavirus from passing someone else hiking. Outdoor transmission was vanishingly rare. Our cloth masks made out of old bandanas wouldn’t have done anything, anyway. But the thing is: We didn’t know.

The thing is, Emily Oster, that we did know. We’ve studied respiratory virus transmission for years. All the virologists and epidemiologists who aren’t total morons knew your 2020 mask routine was crazy and they just didn’t care. They wanted you to do it anyway, because they thought that if they got you to act paranoid and antisocial enough, your insane behaviour might have some limited effect on case curves. Joke’s on you, and it’s sad you still haven’t realized.

In fact, instead of an amnesty, Emily.  I give you this: 

Never Forget.  Never Forgive.  Hold the Line.  

Letting them off the hook means to surrender to a horde of troglodytes.  Amnesty for lying Fauci?  This is worst than running press coverage for Fauci, Birx, Collins, who with his wife, pranced a televised version of Puff the Magic Dragon, the way that Che Guevara would televise public executions on TV for their families to witness the horror.  You have a poor grasp of history.  Maybe you spend too much time around babies.  Give that up occasionally to a babysitter once and a while.  Our family members have died and instead of demanding justice, or God forbid just a cessation of all the vaccine mandates, here you are telling us to forgive and forget.  What a POS.  You ignore the fact that people lost lives, we lost loved ones, brothers, sisters, cousins, parents, family, dear Emily, and your call for amnesty is the rudest insult.  

This video is in response to the @TheAtlantic article about “pandemic amnesty” and it’s a much watch. This man is so right on. pic.twitter.com/ZuuA9tIloD

— Just Mindy 🐊 (@just_mindy) October 31, 2022

Why not ask us to say to these monsters, "Ah, no big deal, no harm no foul" only to let another few years go by before they introduce something else and you're not going to be in any position to help yourself ore your family or friends.  Read this by eugyppius.  

And finally, check out this post with Professor Oster's tweets on lockdowns.  Lovely gal, isn't she?  

When it comes to those who forced lockdowns & drugs on unwilling people now seeking amnesty, an eternal principle stands out: #NeverForget #NeverForgive #HoldTheLine

— Robert Barnes (@barnes_law) October 31, 2022

Lockdown Proponent Calls for Amnesty – But Where’s the Apology? https://t.co/V7TLYfWy5a

— An Avenging Angel (@aveng_angel) November 14, 2022

IRISH HEALTH MINISTER, STEPHEN DONNELLY: "I mean there's oodles of data."

"Can you name a study?": Irish Health Minister Stephen Donnelly pressed on the effectiveness of face masks, as he floats the idea of reintroducing them this winter.  https://t.co/MWPibuFRaN pic.twitter.com/lfF3wr9RTm

— gript (@griptmedia) October 18, 2022

Well, I don't live in Ireland, but I do live in the U.S. where I've seen schoolyards of children wearing masks, not because of any condition they have or any condition they might threaten their classmates with, but because of remote, unaccountable, invisible authority: the county health officer.  

But I do love the language that these official tools give to reporters.  

You may mandate COVID masks this winter, but according to a major report by Ofsted in the UK earlier this year.  There's evidence that face masks could have stunted many children in social and language development.  So I'd like to ask with these known risks, what real-world evidence do you have that masks significantly reduce COVID-19 not based on models but actual real-world examples.   

00:25  So first of all, there is no expectation we will be moving to mask mandates.  Obviously, Ireland does what every other country will have contingency plans in place should there be a variants of concern that out competes Omicron that is a high ratio in terms of severe illness and that escapes the vaccines.  

My comments:  So this was something.  He's admitting that Ireland's response will be just like every other country's response.  Like China's?  Like Austria?  How about Australia?  There's no greater admission or concession that says we defer to a higher central authority than our own nation.  We defer to the International Communist WEF, Davos, and the EU.  These are our gods.  

00:45  The public health advice I have is unambiguous [meaning he'll change his advice next week] on the use of masks.  Masks are important.  We have public health advice in place right now.  They do work.  They do save lives.  And they have been an incredibly important part of our response to the . . . to the pandemic.

01:00  What real-world examples do you have of that other than just saying that they work? 

01:07  I mean there's oodles of data.  There's data all over the world.  There's no serious argument being had in terms of whether face masks . . . there's no serious argument being had in the medical community as to whether face masks are an important public health measure.  Are there trade-offs, are there trade-offs in children wearing masks?  Yes, there are, and those things are taken very seriously, and they are counted for in terms of public health advice.  But in terms of living through a pandemic, there is no serious debate as to whether face masks are an important public health measure . . . .

01:48  Could you name a real-world public health study that shows that . . . ? 

01:51  I will ask the Chief Medical Officer to send you any number of studies to that effect.  Yep, no problem at all.     

Hypercapnia, i.e., CO2 retention, caused by mask wearing reduces blood flow to the kidneys

Aside from being an instrument of torture, masks are terrible for your health.  Is that part of the torture?   

I always knew masking 😷 your face was not a good idea and here's why. https://t.co/jKm7q6WOme

— Michelle Odvody (@MichelleCalliha) October 4, 2022

Hypercapnia, or impaired kidney function.  Your kidneys are trying to decrease the level of acidity in your blood, so they're actually doing a lot to retain, basically to balance the Ph so it really puts a lit of stress on the kidneys to balance the Ph and the salt, and it reduces blood flow to the kidneys and in many cases can lead to chronic inflammation or nephritis.  No one is even talking about this.  Anyone measuring it in our kids?  No. I don't think so.  We have a sleep apnea model of hypercapnia that also causes a lack of oxygen and what they see in these people is altered postural stability, altered ability to sensor environment known as proprioception, altered gait and increased falls.  This is what it looks like when your brain is not getting enough oxygen.  This is not rocket science.  In the context of our children, their brains are still developing and yet we think it's okay to deprive them chronically of oxygen.  We have mitochondria that produce ou energy.  And there is biochemical evidence that masks are damaging our mitochondria because they're trying to work in an environment where it doesn't have what it needs.  Again, the body is out of homeostasis and it's put in a place where it's constantly trying to adjust but it can't adjust because you won't take the mask off.  

CDC DIRECTOR, DR. ROCHELLE WALENSKY: "We're all in this together," except when it comes to you getting hurt or dying, or losing abilities that allow you to work

You need a bullet to the forehead! pic.twitter.com/AzPGwAT7B6

— NiCoLeEliSei (@NiCoLeEliSei1) June 20, 2022

How does she get away with saying, "We have taken another important step together in our fight against COVID-19 by making safe and effective vaccines available for our little ones"?  I mean she's not "in this together" when people suffer vaccine injury and death.  "We have taken"?  Really, I don't remember agreeing to anything related to the masks except being forced to wear them while interacting with customers.  I never agreed to it.  I was forced to, threatened to wear them.  But my former employer didn't coerce me or other employees with vaccine mandates.  But the local stores did.  Oh, yeah, the stores posted signs that read, "If you are vaccinated, you're not required to wear a mask."  Mighty nice of them, except that I wasn't vaccinated and yet I still entered the store without a mask.  

I hope that everybody is realizing now, by now, that this whole pandemic was not about your safety nor was it about your health.  You do know this, correct?  Here is more conflicting testimony.  FDA official, Peter Marks, explains that the vaccine produces 5x more viral myocarditis than what would normally be occurring.  Really?  Do you mean to tell me that myocarditis was a thing in the past, that it was a thing prior to the COVID-19 vaccines?

FDA official Dr. Peter Marks says vaccinated kids have a 5 fold increase of myocarditis. Why on earth are they pushing the COVID vaccine on babies? We still don’t know the long-term safety profile of these vaccines. pic.twitter.com/Ya3jdR3zRl

— Senator Ron Johnson (@SenRonJohnson) June 16, 2022

Wouldn't you assume that the CDC Director knows the claims publicized by the FDA?  Or is it a case, like the FBI and the CIA, that they are competing agencies with each one fighting for a more supreme legitimacy?  Marks serves as the Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research within the Food and Drug Administration.  So to answer my question, maybe they don't communicate at all.  There would, in fact, be no need to.   

Though I think for some of the younger members of our society who have little experience and little knowledge of how our government, and government in general, is more often in service of murdering you.  Think about the wars, how they send young men off to die in a foreign land in which they have no real skin in the game or no epidermis in the competition.   How many Mengeles does the United States have exactly?  Wait, did I read that right?  Fun Fact: Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Chief Medical Advisor to the President (who is NOT Jewish) was awarded Tel Aviv University's Dan David Prize with $1 million, for "speaking truth to power" amid the COVID-19 pandemic."  What a pantload. 

Tal Zaks is Chief Medical Officer of Moderna.  Since 2021, he's been on the Board of Directors at TEVA Pharmaceuticals.

Billionaire, Leonard Schiefer, Founder [co-founded it in 1988] and CEO of Regeneron.  A few highlights of Schiefer's success: 

Leonard Schleifer cofounded drugmaker Regeneron in 1988 and remains CEO of the Tarrytown, New York company.

Schleifer took Regeneron public in 1991; he owns nearly 4% of the company's common stock.

Sales of Regeneron's blockbuster drug Eylea, a treatment for macular degeneration, reached $4.6 billion in the U.S. in 2019.

Regeneron has developed six FDA-approved medicines.

In June 2020, Regeneron began clinical trials of a new antibody medicine to prevent and treat people with Covid-19.

Rachel Levine, born Richard Levine in 1957, became a "woman" in 2011, Levine is an American pediatrician and a 4-Star Admiral in the United States Public Health Service Commissioned Corps.  He has been the United States Assistant Secretary for Health since March 26, 2021.  Appointed by Biden, of course, the WEF's man in the White House.  Regardless of where these folks got their medical or health degrees, be assured that they're top graduates from CLOWN COLLEGE.

Jeff Zients, Albert Bourla, Mikael Dolstein, Sherri Berger, Ann Schuchat, Dr. Rocelle P. Walensky, current Director of the CDC.  Regarding psychopath, Dr. Rochelle P. Walendsky, you really should give this a listen.  This one too.  She's had zero credibility, and yet here she is advocating that children under 5 get 3 vaccine doses, let me remind you, for a disease that DOES NOT EFFECT CHILDREN.