So on January 18 [2021], they detect an issue. They do nothing and they kill 60 people at least . . . . After that occurrence, everything else should be considered intentional.

Maria Zeee: BOMBSHELL Team Enigma Whistleblower! US DoD Plan to Exterminate Population – Sasha Latypova https://t.co/gBBVikaWji via @redvoicenews

— An Avenging Angel (@aveng_angel) November 6, 2022

Manufacturers have safety signals in place.  So the signals regarding the unsafe nature of the vaccines were ignored, consistently ignored . . . .  These safety systems exists.  The manufacturers have these systems themselves and they monitor them, and most of the time they detect safety problems themselves.  The vast majority of product recalled are volunteered by the manufacturer.  With automobiles, you get messages from the car deal informing you that this model has a defective part.  Same system exists for the pharmaceutical products.   

8:27  And these systems exist at the federal, state, and county level.  Health authorities monitor and or pull products when there's a problem.   I found one news report in Orange County, California, the Health authority accidentally did their job and on January 18, 2021, which was just two weeks after the rollout of these shots in the United States, they detected a problem with the lot of Moderna, and they said that there were too many "allergic reactions. . . ." And it was reported in numerous news outlets, including CNN, but nothing happened.  And that lot was allowed to continue to be distributed all over the United States, until the end of March, until it ran out, and I counted in the VAERS system over 3,000 adverse events and 60 deaths.  So on January 18, they detect an issue.  They do nothing and they kill 60 people at least, we know that VAERS is under reported.  After that occurrence, everything else should be considered intentional.  And by the way, throughout the world.  This product is distributed throughout the world.  And wherever it's sold in every country, this should be noted by the regulators and nobody did anything.   

10:18  How did this fraud come about with these regulators playing the role of the regulator but they're not actual regulators?  They know, and they're just part of the theater.  I got my information from Katherine Watt, a private citizen and a deep and experienced researcher in legal matters.  She writes at Substack.  It's called Bailiwick News.  She calls it American Domestic Bioterrorism, but it's actually American International Bioterrorism program because it includes many other countries where these products are being distributed. So she revealed this whole scheme, which is actually quite simple.  The United States government and the Department of Defense are running this program.  The U.S. gov't, over many years--this goes back a decade--put in place three key pieces where they removed the regulations that we just discussed.  They removed the manufacturing practices requirements and all the safety monitoring requirements for what they called "countermeasures."  They call these things "countermeasures."  BTW, these vaccines are classified as "Countermeasures."  [Okay, what does that mean?] Countermeasures is a euphemism for weapons.  So the Department of Defense has the right to order these countermeasures, meaning weapons, from private manufacturers, meaning Pfizer, Moderna, and a whole bunch of their suppliers, there's like hundreds of companies that make this.  So these are Emergency Use Authorized, EUA, so no regulations apply to them, and this happens under public health emergencies.  So three things: 1) you have DOD other transactional authority where they contracted bribed manufacturers 2) they make countermeasures, and 3) which are Emergency Use Authorized, and this happens under Public Health Emergencies.  So when those conditions are met, no regulations apply whatsoever.  The only standard for releasing them or deploying them is the United States Health and Human Services, USHHS, had Alex Azar under the Trump Administration, and now currently it's Xavier Becerra.  It's up to that person's sole discretion to deploy these weapons.  If they feel that they may be effective.  That's it.  There's no other standard that applies.   

13:20  Are we talking about Operation Warp Speed, for example? Yes.  OWS is a DOD operation, with the DOD in charge of the entire operation.  Layers of U.S. government that designs, develops, and manufactures these products.  And Pharma is just suppliers.  They execute only orders.  But everything is designed, developed, and manufactured by DOD.  But the legal structure is, once they make these things, the HHS Secretary, Alex Azar, if he decides they may be effective, they're released on the market.  Notice that this is done by the DOD with their suppliers and network and so forth.  DOD is not regulated by FDA.  It's not regulated by "good manufacturing practices" or good "distribution practices," does not have to run clinical trials.  [I don't see how fraud goes undetected.]  The FDA's own website states that 

Consumers expect that each batch of medicines they take will meet quality standards so that they will be safe and effective.

So they expect a certain quality.  But the quality regulators were let off the hook for the COVID vaccine.  Huh.  

Does not have to demonstrate safety and efficacy.  BTW, for these products, no clinical trials are needed because HHS Secretary declares them to be "effective."  They don't have to be safe.  The decision to release them in the market to the American people is left to the sole discretion of the HHS Secretary, in this instance, it was Alex Azar.  The FDA plays no role here.  What FDA has been doing is acting, and playing theater, pretending to be a regulator, so they're impersonating a regulator, and they have no role to regulate these products.  And that's the fraud that has been committed on all of us.  [Among others, I would add.]  We also have leaked emails we see that the FDA pressured the European medicine Agencies to approve these things on specific schedule, and they created this whole panic, by saying, "Oh, my God, if we don't approve by Christmas 2020, the world will come to an end."  So they pushed the European regulators who are also quite aware.  I don't think they're amateurs and they probably investigated the legal structure of this scheme.  And they probably did the same in Australia and everywhere else where they pushed this garbage.  After all the evidence of reproductive healt damage, heart attacks, myocarditis, and nerve destruction, we go to the regulators to have a discussion, showing them the data, but the regulators refuse to look at the data and refuse to acknowledge them.  They tell us to go away, that it's been determined to be safe and effective.  They're acting.  They're pretending.  They're stalling everyone.  We keep going there only to learn that we're barking up the wrong tree. 

19:00  The main perpetrator here is the DOD.  The contracts of the players show that this scheme was planned.  In the U.S. about 400 contracts . . . for everything, vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, masks, swabs, test kits, staffing, logistics, everything related.  

Five doctors are challenging a California law that threatens to punish them for deviating from the COVID-19 "scientific consensus."

Five doctors are challenging a California law that threatens to punish them for deviating from the COVID-19 "scientific consensus." https://t.co/7phFp0gZFP

— reason (@reason) November 3, 2022

This was a good point.  Yeah, given how the scientific consensus changes from day to day, week to week, month to month, how can the law rely on a standard? 

Leaving aside the practical challenge of defining the "scientific consensus" at any given time, that consensus is constantly evolving. The very nature of scientific inquiry means that today's majority view may ultimately be proven wrong. The history of the COVID-19 pandemic is littered with such examples. 

The scientific consensus on masking and vaccination has raised intense debate.  

The California Medical Association argued that A.B. 2098 was necessary because some physicians had been "calling into question public health efforts such as masking and vaccinations." Yet both of those subjects have generated vigorous, empirically informed debates among scientists. 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) initially dismissed the value of general masking, then embraced it as "the most important, powerful public health tool we have." More recently, it has conceded that commonly used cloth masks do little, if anything, to stop coronavirus transmission. That view had previously been deemed "misinformation" egregious enough to justify removing it from social media platforms.

"Lockdown Moderate" and Parent Guru, Emily Oster, Calls for Americans to Forgive the CDC, the FDA, County Health Officers, Governors, Fauci, Birx, Collins, Gottlieb, Bourla, et al. Sorry, Sister. Never Forget. Never Forgive. Hold the Line.

NEW - The Atlantic publishes a call for amnesty rather than accountability for what has been done to people during the pandemic. pic.twitter.com/sK3TYOxPBC

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) October 31, 2022

Don't make me laugh.  The answer is NO.

The author's name is Professor Emily Oster, a woman who writes about pregnancy and parenthood.  And here she is to tell us to forgive what Fauci, Collins, Scarf-Lady Debra Birx, Scott Gottlieb, your local county health officer in tandem with your governor told us to isolate, to social distance, wear a panty on your face, prevent you from dining out, effectively locking up your elderly grandmother or parent in a convalescent home before killing them.  Yeah, right, Emily, oh, such a pretty Victorian name Emily.

Eugyppius calls her out: Professor Oster is a "lockdown moderate."  Oh, how compromising.  Problem is that she's compromising your health and the nation's economic health.  

I don’t know much about the American pandemic pundits, but I gather that Brown University economist and “parenting guru” Emily Oster is far from the worst of them. Her Twitter timeline suggests she spent the early months of the pandemic terrified about the virus until school closures took their toll on her kids, at which point she repositioned herself as a kind of lockdown moderate, opposing the worst of the hystericist excesses while validating their central premises whenever possible to save face with friends and colleagues.

My unpopular opinion of the day is that I think we may be reaching the limits of fear-based vaccine motivation. And there are downsides to continuing to sow fear among those who are already afraid.

What might work?

-Full FDA approval
-Employer mandates

— ProfEmilyOster (@ProfEmilyOster) July 14, 2021

Oh, I love this, Emily.  Why don't you retreat to your downtown townhome far away from the rest of civilized, real working people, huh? 

Emily Oster’s latest act of moderation is the suggestion that we forgive and forget all the disastrous policies inflicted on us by terrified wealthy urbanites, clueless technocrats and mad scientist vaccinators since 2020, because, hey, these were just honest mistakes, anybody could’ve messed up like that, it’s all good.

April 2020, with nothing else to do, my family took an enormous number of hikes. We all wore cloth masks that I had made myself. We had a family hand signal, which the person in the front would use if someone was approaching on the trail and we needed to put on our masks.  Once, when another child got too close to my then-4-year-old son on a bridge, he yelled at her “SOCIAL DISTANCING!”

These precautions were totally misguided. In April 2020, no one got the coronavirus from passing someone else hiking. Outdoor transmission was vanishingly rare. Our cloth masks made out of old bandanas wouldn’t have done anything, anyway. But the thing is: We didn’t know.

The thing is, Emily Oster, that we did know. We’ve studied respiratory virus transmission for years. All the virologists and epidemiologists who aren’t total morons knew your 2020 mask routine was crazy and they just didn’t care. They wanted you to do it anyway, because they thought that if they got you to act paranoid and antisocial enough, your insane behaviour might have some limited effect on case curves. Joke’s on you, and it’s sad you still haven’t realized.

In fact, instead of an amnesty, Emily.  I give you this: 

Never Forget.  Never Forgive.  Hold the Line.  

Letting them off the hook means to surrender to a horde of troglodytes.  Amnesty for lying Fauci?  This is worst than running press coverage for Fauci, Birx, Collins, who with his wife, pranced a televised version of Puff the Magic Dragon, the way that Che Guevara would televise public executions on TV for their families to witness the horror.  You have a poor grasp of history.  Maybe you spend too much time around babies.  Give that up occasionally to a babysitter once and a while.  Our family members have died and instead of demanding justice, or God forbid just a cessation of all the vaccine mandates, here you are telling us to forgive and forget.  What a POS.  You ignore the fact that people lost lives, we lost loved ones, brothers, sisters, cousins, parents, family, dear Emily, and your call for amnesty is the rudest insult.  

This video is in response to the @TheAtlantic article about “pandemic amnesty” and it’s a much watch. This man is so right on. pic.twitter.com/ZuuA9tIloD

— Just Mindy 🐊 (@just_mindy) October 31, 2022

Why not ask us to say to these monsters, "Ah, no big deal, no harm no foul" only to let another few years go by before they introduce something else and you're not going to be in any position to help yourself ore your family or friends.  Read this by eugyppius.  

And finally, check out this post with Professor Oster's tweets on lockdowns.  Lovely gal, isn't she?  

When it comes to those who forced lockdowns & drugs on unwilling people now seeking amnesty, an eternal principle stands out: #NeverForget #NeverForgive #HoldTheLine

— Robert Barnes (@barnes_law) October 31, 2022

Lockdown Proponent Calls for Amnesty – But Where’s the Apology? https://t.co/V7TLYfWy5a

— An Avenging Angel (@aveng_angel) November 14, 2022

DR. ERIC BERG: “There is actually no real estrogen or progesterone in a birth control pill. What you do have is a synthetic version altered in a way to mimic estrogen and progesterone.”

Thank you to Mary Wicker from LifeSite News @ LewRockwell.com.

 

Dr. Eric Berg said the long-term effects of removing natural hormones from a woman’s body are quite dangerous, negatively affecting menopause, bone function, and even longevity.

(LifeSiteNews) – A popular dietary expert on YouTube released a new video that explains the dangers of artificial birth control and advocates instead for a natural form of family planning.

Dr. Eric Berg, a chiropractor and dietary expert with over 8 million subscribers on YouTube, posted a YouTube video with a discussion on the “dark side of the birth control pill” while exposing the negative effects the pill has on women and offering a natural alternative.

“There is actually no real estrogen or progesterone in a birth control pill,” Berg said. “What you do have is a synthetic version altered in a way to mimic estrogen and progesterone.”

Berg went on to say that what women do not realize is that replacing naturally produced estrogen and progesterone with an artificial version can lead to various complications.

Among numerous health risks, the birth control pill can “increase your risk of heart attacks, blood pressure, strokes, blood clots, breast cancer, dementia, depression, acne, mood swings, [and] it can even trigger auto-immune diseases.” He went on to describe how birth control also depletes women of many necessary minerals such as zinc, selenium, and magnesium, and vitamins such as B12.

“What a lot of women don’t realize is when you take this pill, you are shutting down the production of estrogen and progesterone,” he said.

Berg went on to explain that this is a dangerous thing to do because women, unlike men who produce testosterone every day, produce their necessary hormones in “two major spikes.” That is, instead of producing the necessary hormones daily, women produce the hormones at two points during their cycle, one where they see an increase in estrogen, and one where they see an increase in progesterone.

Berg says the long-term effects of removing natural hormones from a woman’s body are quite dangerous, negatively affecting menopause, bone function, and even longevity.

Widespread human misery from contraception-enabled promiscuity

Pro-life and pro-family activists have long warned of the dangers of artificial contraception – as has the Catholic Church, which is the only remaining religion to condemn contraception openly and completely. In addition to the many health dangers of the birth control pill, some of which were outlined by Berg, the broader culture of casual sex that contraception (including non-hormonal barrier methods), has enabled and encouraged has led to widespread misery from promiscuity, increased abortion rates (with abortion regarded as a back-up method of birth control), and skyrocketing rates of sexually transmitted diseases. It has also degraded male-female relationships by giving men access to easy sex with little to no commitment or consequences.

And although artificial birth control is frequently peddled to young women as a way to treat acne or menstrual or hormonal disorders, pro-life and pro-family advocates point out that this approach masks symptoms rather than addresses their underlying cause.

Birth control pills and IUDs can also cause very early abortions. If they fail to prevent fertilization – which is when a whole, distinct, living human being begins to exist – these methods of contraception typically weaken the lining of the uterus so that it is hostile to a newly created human, preventing implantation.

‘An offense against the law of God and of nature’

Even non-Catholic Christians largely opposed contraception until the Lambeth Conference of 1930 infamously approved it in some instances. In Casti Connubii, Pope Pius XII refuted the idea that contraception was ever acceptable, warning that those who “deliberately frustrate” the “natural power and purpose” of the marital act “sin against nature and commit a deed which is shameful and intrinsically vicious.”

READ: The Church’s total ban on contraception cannot be changed by Pope Francis or anyone else

“Any use whatsoever of matrimony exercised in such a way that the act is deliberately frustrated in its natural power to generate life is an offense against the law of God and of nature,” Pius XII wrote, “and those who indulge in such are branded with the guilt of a grave sin.”

Instead of artificial birth control, Berg recommended Natural Cycles, an app that allows women to track their cycles and accompanying symptoms in order to avoid or achieve pregnancy. Natural Cycles is “the first FDA cleared birth control app,” its website says, and it tells users trying to avoid pregnancy to use non-hormonal contraception (condoms) “or abstain from sex” on fertile days. (There are a number of methods of menstrual/hormonal cycle tracking that couples can use to achieve or avoid pregnancy without degrading the marital act; Pius XII outlined some of the legitimate reasons for intentionally abstaining from intercourse during the fertile window in his famous Address to Midwives on the Nature of Their Profession.)

READ: Bp. Strickland celebrates Church teaching on contraception amid rumors of papal review

Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas has previously reminded Catholics of their duty to respect the Church’s teachings on contraception. On July 26, the anniversary of the publication of Humanae Vitae, Strickland tweeted a reminder to all Catholics to heed the truth in regard to this issue.

“Humanae Vitae, issued in July 54 years ago, taught the Truth that contraception is immoral and does harm to marriage & the family,” he said. “We have lived for more than 1/2 a century with humanity rejecting this Truth & this has done great harm to the human family. Let us heed The Truth!”

Humane Vitae, issued in July 54 years ago, taught the Truth that contraception is immoral and does harm to marriage & the family. We have lived for more than 1/2 a century with humanity rejecting this Truth & this has done great harm to the human family. Let us heed The Truth!

— Bishop J. Strickland (@Bishopoftyler) July 26, 2022

IRISH HEALTH MINISTER, STEPHEN DONNELLY: "I mean there's oodles of data."

"Can you name a study?": Irish Health Minister Stephen Donnelly pressed on the effectiveness of face masks, as he floats the idea of reintroducing them this winter.  https://t.co/MWPibuFRaN pic.twitter.com/lfF3wr9RTm

— gript (@griptmedia) October 18, 2022

Well, I don't live in Ireland, but I do live in the U.S. where I've seen schoolyards of children wearing masks, not because of any condition they have or any condition they might threaten their classmates with, but because of remote, unaccountable, invisible authority: the county health officer.  

But I do love the language that these official tools give to reporters.  

You may mandate COVID masks this winter, but according to a major report by Ofsted in the UK earlier this year.  There's evidence that face masks could have stunted many children in social and language development.  So I'd like to ask with these known risks, what real-world evidence do you have that masks significantly reduce COVID-19 not based on models but actual real-world examples.   

00:25  So first of all, there is no expectation we will be moving to mask mandates.  Obviously, Ireland does what every other country will have contingency plans in place should there be a variants of concern that out competes Omicron that is a high ratio in terms of severe illness and that escapes the vaccines.  

My comments:  So this was something.  He's admitting that Ireland's response will be just like every other country's response.  Like China's?  Like Austria?  How about Australia?  There's no greater admission or concession that says we defer to a higher central authority than our own nation.  We defer to the International Communist WEF, Davos, and the EU.  These are our gods.  

00:45  The public health advice I have is unambiguous [meaning he'll change his advice next week] on the use of masks.  Masks are important.  We have public health advice in place right now.  They do work.  They do save lives.  And they have been an incredibly important part of our response to the . . . to the pandemic.

01:00  What real-world examples do you have of that other than just saying that they work? 

01:07  I mean there's oodles of data.  There's data all over the world.  There's no serious argument being had in terms of whether face masks . . . there's no serious argument being had in the medical community as to whether face masks are an important public health measure.  Are there trade-offs, are there trade-offs in children wearing masks?  Yes, there are, and those things are taken very seriously, and they are counted for in terms of public health advice.  But in terms of living through a pandemic, there is no serious debate as to whether face masks are an important public health measure . . . .

01:48  Could you name a real-world public health study that shows that . . . ? 

01:51  I will ask the Chief Medical Officer to send you any number of studies to that effect.  Yep, no problem at all.     

Putin was selected by Yeltsin BECAUSE he was not a Communist and was moderate. If Putin was a communist, Yeltsin and his family would have been in prison.

Thank you to Martin Armstrong @ Armstrong Economics.  

I feel sorry for you for those who believe the propaganda put out to justify a war that Putin is this madman. Be careful what you believe and wish for. You probably think the government really cares about you and your future. You probably still wear masks driving alone, or even when you sleep, and possibly a condom just in case for good measure.

There are those of us who have REAL contacts and who understand REAL geopolitics and the way governments create wars by filling the minds of their people that there are weapons of mass destruction. Now even a former MI6 agent has come out and said the same thing. You better be careful what you wish for. Putin was selected by Yeltsin BECAUSE he was not a Communist and was moderate. Yeltsin was under siege from the communists who did want to resurrect the USSR and the oligarchs who wanted to strip mine Russia for themselves. If Putin was a communist, Yeltsin and his family would have been in prison.

I have all the declassified documents from the Clinton Administration that CONFIRM that Putin was nothing that the propaganda is all about. He NEVER sought to resurrect the USSR. As far as the KGB, he was never high-ranking and quit in 1991 as soon as Russia fell. All of the comments put out there by John McCain were outright lies. I have the security briefing he read and said the opposite because he was a Neocon who just wanted endless wars.

So you can believe all the BS. They need you to do that to wage war and offer your life on their altar of political agendas. If you think you will be an armchair general and watch this war on CNN, sorry. It will come to a neighborhood near you. I just thank God I am not 18. The future these people want is total insanity. The Weimar Republic in Germany took place because it was a revolution against the imperial government that always waged war. We face the same fate when the people realize this has been a mountain of lies for a political agenda. When Zelensky came to power, he promised peace. He was then instructed by the West that was not acceptable. The West promoted the civil war in Ukraine.

It is the hardliners putting pressure on Putin because he has been “too soft” on Ukraine. Replace Putin and we will get World War III. Zelensky better pack his high-heels in an emergency exit bag. 

Germany to Burn Almost 800 Million Unused COVID Masks

Burn baby burn. Green and clean. 🤦‍♂️ https://t.co/2TSETzzLx8

— Lucio Saverio-Eastman 🌎 (@atonalmuse) October 15, 2022

$6 billion dollars in mask purchases?  I wished I could have gotten in on that action.  

Germany spent €6 billion ($5.9 billion) on face covers at the start of the pandemic, according to Spiegel. Former Health Minister Jens Spahn was criticized at the time for excessive procurement and for using personal connections to buy masks, steps he defended by citing major supply shortages and a desperation to obtain protective coverings swiftly. 

Where Were All the Fact-Checkers When . . .

Where were all the "fact checkers" when pharmaceutical CEOS, government leaders, public health bureaucrats, media pundits & celebrities were assuring the public that the shots were protective against transmission?

— lovereignssupreme (@lovereignssupr1) October 14, 2022

Ain't this the truth?  Where were the fact-checkers when the lockdowns were introduced?  

When the masks were introduced?  

When the PCR tests were introduced?  

The average dude and chick online were using social media to find answers, because they certainly weren't coming fast and furious from any public health agency.  To the contrary, those mfers lied to us then threatened us.  Threats that ultimately led people to get the jab.  

The government lied to us.  

Government-connected Bill Gates lied to us.  [No surprise there.]  

International agencies--the W.H.O., the CDC, the NIH, the U.N., the FDA all lied to us, to Americans, and to the entire world.  

The truth is that plenty of people fact-checked those claims but the rollout was in each case was too powerful, too orchestrated, too well-planned, and funded like you wouldn't believe.  

FACT-CHECKERS

Who lied to us and how did they lie to us?

Hey idiots, big pharma never claimed it’s vaccine worked like a vaccine so shut up. - AP fact checkers https://t.co/0jE5Puf8hC

— Salty Cracker (@SaltyCracker9) October 14, 2022

CENSORSHIP

Who lied to us?  

Bill Gates funded the censorship battle.  

Debra Birx.

Anthony Fauci

Francis Collins

Scott Gottlieb

The Director-General of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

LOCKDOWNS

Who fact-checked the lockdown?  A few people.  

The folks who signed the Great Barrington Declaration.  

Scott Atlas, White House Task Force advisor.  

from Tom Woods

Nobody fact-checked their claims.  Fact-checkers weren't a thing back then in 2020 during the BLM's and Antifa's Summer of Love.  Distracted and exhausted from the "mostly peaceful" violence across the country, people met the rollout of the vaccines with critical thinking having taken a hit.  2020 was one long year of cognitive dissonance.  It was like     

". . . masks are also illegal in some communities precisely because they present the citizens in a town with a threat of robbery. Bandits love masks."

The "protective" masks that everybody is wearing have been an unmitigated disaster from the outset.  First, they are menacing which only helped to emphasize a threat.  But in this case, the treats were now multiplied by the thousands of mask wearers.  When I first spotted more than a few people wearing masks, it alarmed me because it's like they got orders from some cult or underground army.  Truly.  Not only do we know that masks don't prevent transmission or protect from infection.  We know they're unhealthy.  Worse yet, they ruin a young child's sense of communication and their ability to read cues from adults.  It's hard not to continually condemn these because no one has been brought to account regarding the masks.  You still see people wearing them, and I am sure that as the late fall and winter months approach, more people will be wearing them.  But I said early on that the masks are also illegal in some communities precisely because they present the citizens in a town with a threat of robbery.  Bandits love masks.   

Normalizing masks was a huge fucking mistake. https://t.co/U2OcTNBiDL

— Eli Klein (@TheEliKlein) October 9, 2022

Hypercapnia, i.e., CO2 retention, caused by mask wearing reduces blood flow to the kidneys

Aside from being an instrument of torture, masks are terrible for your health.  Is that part of the torture?   

I always knew masking 😷 your face was not a good idea and here's why. https://t.co/jKm7q6WOme

— Michelle Odvody (@MichelleCalliha) October 4, 2022

Hypercapnia, or impaired kidney function.  Your kidneys are trying to decrease the level of acidity in your blood, so they're actually doing a lot to retain, basically to balance the Ph so it really puts a lit of stress on the kidneys to balance the Ph and the salt, and it reduces blood flow to the kidneys and in many cases can lead to chronic inflammation or nephritis.  No one is even talking about this.  Anyone measuring it in our kids?  No. I don't think so.  We have a sleep apnea model of hypercapnia that also causes a lack of oxygen and what they see in these people is altered postural stability, altered ability to sensor environment known as proprioception, altered gait and increased falls.  This is what it looks like when your brain is not getting enough oxygen.  This is not rocket science.  In the context of our children, their brains are still developing and yet we think it's okay to deprive them chronically of oxygen.  We have mitochondria that produce ou energy.  And there is biochemical evidence that masks are damaging our mitochondria because they're trying to work in an environment where it doesn't have what it needs.  Again, the body is out of homeostasis and it's put in a place where it's constantly trying to adjust but it can't adjust because you won't take the mask off.  

POLAND: A lawyer is asked to put on a mask and this happens

🇵🇱 Poland. A lawyer is asked to put on a mask and this happens🤣 pic.twitter.com/mAPqScjNAI

— .. (@Xx17965797N) September 21, 2022

The memes in this thread are pretty good.  I don't like wearing masks.  Too evocative of violence.  And if someone argues that masks are somehow beneficial for my health, they need to prove it incontrovertibly.  And because they can't, and because I don't like wearing them, I don't wear them.  If that causes some to be anxious, good.   

HARMFUL EFFECTS OF MASKS: Relatives of an inpatient who died directly as a result of miscommunication between two masked health professionals?

Dr Gary Sidley sets out the case for why facemasks against COVID-19 are ineffective and harmful and why mask mandates in healthcare settings must be dropped without delay. https://t.co/nF0azOesXh

— Toby Young (@toadmeister) September 16, 2022

In their campaign to drop the mask mandates across the British Isles, it was interesting to learn of pending lawsuits from families whose members died as a direct result of the interferences of masks--interferences in communication, and other disruptions.

At Smile Free, we routinely hear anecdotal reports of how (often vulnerable) people suffer as a direct consequence of the expectation to wear a mask in healthcare setting. What defence would NHS Scotland offer when faced with complaints – and threats of litigation – from:

1. The family of an elderly lady who died shortly after fracturing her femur in a fall after being pressured to wear a mask in a hospital outpatient department?
2. A hard-of-hearing man who accidentally overdosed on prescribed medication, a mask having rendered his doctor’s instructions inaudible?
3. Relatives of an inpatient who died directly as a result of miscommunication between two masked health professionals?
4. The father of a young woman, a victim of historical sexual and physical abuse, who was re-traumatised by the obligation to wear a mask for an outpatient appointment resulting in her subsequently taking her own life?
5. A long-standing patient with respiratory difficulties who contracts pneumonia as a consequence of repeated masking when attending for appointments?
6. A lady whose historical problem of recurrent panic attacks is re-activated by the somatic sensations of a mask over her mouth, leading to a prolonged admission to psychiatric hospital?
7. A coroner’s report of the death of a young child from a non-Covid illness after the parents were too scared to attend hospital (partly as a result of the fear perpetuation associated with widespread masking)?

" . . . create a new reality that somehow a shot is immunity"

COVID-19 always was influenza.  No it wasn't, Judy.  COVID-19 is the syndrome that develops from having SARS-CoV-2 virus.  

pic.twitter.com/B2K02Gxu7F

— Wejolyn 🇺🇸 (@Wejolyn) September 11, 2022

0:00.  So every year the flu shot and the Prevnar shot [a pneumococcal vaccine; we should know by now there are no benefits to any of these vaccines].  It used to be called PNI, pneumonia and influenza.  Now it's called PIC, pneumonia, influenza, and coronavirus.  And Tony Fauci just said last night, so now every year, every 6 months, you're going to get all 3 shots and it's going to be called a flu shot.  Well, if it's one shot, why are you putting it in each arm?  Because they've always done that and told you that's a flu shot.  So they've been lying to us for decades and killing the elderly, or the most susceptible.  The goal of COVID-19 was to kill everyone you injured, create a new reality that somehow a shot is immunity and that, as I've heard, all the masks ended influenza.  No it didn't.  COVID-19 always was influenza, January 2020: 4,000 deaths a week from influenza.  Never was COVID or SARS-CoV-2 or anything else.  And now that we started injecting the COVID . . .

1:13. Notice there isn't a single COVID vaccine that says on the bottle SARS-CoV-2.  That's because it's nit.  It's humanized SARS-CoV-2.  It's deadlier SARS-CoV-2.  It's more deadly SARS-CoV-2.  

1:30. So if those shots have done that much damage, Russian Roulette--you've got 5 bullets in the barrel, you know.  Are you going to spin that wheel?  Are you going to roll those dice?  Is it worth . . . we're playing Russian Roulette.  What are you really doing?  So I'm hoping, it's really my prayer that people wake up and see what's been done for a long time.  It's been a long time, and both you and I know the susceptible gave been injured, have been given afib, or atrial fibrillation in the elderly . . . the explosion to drive the use of Eliquis and other drugs that are bleeding people out and causing cancer that have never been tested.  Yeah, there's a lot of fear mongering going on . . . 

Randi Weingarten: Full of Hypocrisy, Full of Slogans

Randi Weingarten admits teachers are social justice warriors as she attacks Republicans https://t.co/zWsflTeeFE

— Daily Mail US (@DailyMail) September 3, 2022

I have been saying this for years.  It seems odd to see this admitted in print.  But the headline leaves out a starker truth: that teachers are not just social justice warriors, but that they are foot soldiers for the Democratic Party.  Even more brazen is the fact that the head of the main teachers' union in the United States is admitting this without any embarrassment or conscience.  What's worse is the fact that she is lying.  She's lying about the timing of this "social justice" warriorism trend.  Weingarten argues that teachers have become social justice warriors of late because Republicans have run campaigns across the country to ban "woke" books and issues.  She blames politicians for turning teachers into social justice warriors.  Maybe.  But the union itself is responsible for turning teachers into woke warriors.  You don't automatically respect someone solely because they belong to a group.  You don't respect teachers because they're a teacher.  Some are sadistic, many are bad teachers.  "Politicians have turned teachers into 'social justice warriors."  Hardly.  The unions turn teachers into warriors.  Deserving or not, they see how their largesse has improved because of education and because they're working with kids whom they place on a similar scale of impoverishment, they start seeing the kids as their equal.  Many teachers were groomed to be social justice warriors in college and the university.  To cite the banning of The Diary of Anne Frank without adequate reason is stunning, self-serving deceit.  

Apparently, in a hall meeting, Weingarten said that "People would want to be teachers if they knew they'd be respected."  She's got it completely backwards.  You don't tell people to respect something or someone before they've met them or before they've considered the topic.  That is so horse before the cart that I can't even begin to state it.  She is not qualified to be the speaker for anything educational if she gets that wrong.  Respect is earned.  If it's a general respect toward people, that's one thing.  If it's a general respect toward a class of people or toward representatives in an industry, like basketball players for their height or physical abilities, that's different.  And this is the kind of thing that inexperienced kids might do.  But to expect them to respect their teachers?  There's no real evidence that they can do that.  Teachers are about reinforcing control.  Teachers are about physical discipline.  True enough, kids can respect disciplined teachers, for sure, they can respect the authority, but that's it.  And respect for authority is mainly about respecting fear.  

She goes on, 

She also stated . . . that teachers are burnt out because they are required to be 'masks police' and regulate what they can teach. 

The teachers and their union were fully behind masking kids [and vaccinating teachers] and thoroughly supported the lockdowns.  It's a sloppy job at damage control.  Where does she get off playing the victims to circumstances that she created?  Yeah, that extra monitoring assignment can be bad.  Then don't implement it, Randi.   

She went on: 'That has been what has created some of the burnout. And that's not parents. That's politicians. Parents just want the best for their kids. And so do the teachers.' 

Saying "Parents want the best for their kids" is so vague that it's not even funny.  Like most politicians, Rand is full of slogans.  

 

All masks tested positive for Titanium Dioxide (TiO2), a group 2B carcinogenic

So, lots of people wore masks in 2020 and 2021 . . . .  Hmm.  I wonder how wearing them primed one's immune system to down regulate, meaning operate at a lower function for months under the radar.  And to think parents forced these on their children, and adults forced these on their students. 

SHOCKING: As we predicted… All masks tested positive for Titanium Dioxide (TiO2), a group 2B carcinogenic. The best (lowest contamination) has more than 5x the acceptable limit.

Ohh and by the way, you are forcing your kid to breathing through it.  https://t.co/vv1G5KY60W

— Dr. Gina - RAV (@RealAmVoice) (@RealDrGina) August 30, 2022

Hoisted by her own petard

Thank you to Robert Barnes and the Justice Centre.

Justice Centre BREAKING NEWS: https://t.co/5MWuS76eFa

— Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (@JCCFCanada) August 23, 2022

Dr. Hinshaw knowingly withheld evidence from the court regarding her knowledge of the dangers and harms of forced masking on children

CALGARY: The Justice Centre today announces a court application has been filed to compel Dr. Deena Hinshaw to re-attend court for further cross-examination in the constitutional challenge to her lockdown orders. The application alleges that Dr. Hinshaw knowingly withheld evidence from the court regarding her knowledge of the dangers and harms of forced masking on children. The Application is brought jointly by Leighton Grey, Q.C. – on behalf of the Justice Centre for Heights Baptist Church, Northside Baptist Church, Erin Blacklaws, and Tory Tanner – and Jeffrey Rath, counsel for Rebecca Ingram. A court hearing is scheduled for Friday, August 26, 2022, to reopen the case based on new evidence.

The application also requests that the Court require Dr. Hinshaw to produce all of her recommendations to the Kenney government related to her own Covid lockdown orders, as well as to require Dr. Hinshaw to answer all questions which were previously objected to by counsel for the government of Alberta on the basis of Cabinet Confidentiality.

According to the Application, the Alberta government-generated memo states that:

• There is insufficient direct evidence of the effectiveness of face masks in reducing transmission of Covid in educational settings;
• 
  
• That there are harmful effects of mask wearing on children; and

That masks can:

• Disrupt learning;
• Interfere with children’s social development;
• Interfere with children’s emotional development;
• Interfere with children’s speech development;
• Impair verbal and non-verbal communication;
• Impair emotional signalling; and
• Impair facial recognition.

During her cross-examination in April, Dr. Hinshaw was specifically asked whether she was aware of any evidence of harms to elementary school children from being compelled to wear masks. Dr. Hinshaw answered this question before the court in April in the negative. The Application contends Dr. Hinshaw’s answers to this line of questions were false, and that she failed to disclose her knowledge of the harms to children from forced masking.

The application asserts that it is clear that there were a significant number of studies in Dr. Hinshaw’s possession or control which in fact did show evidence of harm to children from forced masking. Dr. Hinshaw’s health orders required forced public masking, including masking of elementary-aged children in all schools.

Pinche COVID. Pinche IMF

Thank you to Good Citizen @ Lew Rockwell.

The tequila strikes hard and fast in the August heat after just an hour of perspiration from trampling the scorching Malecon. The humidity smothers each breath like those cheap Chinese disposable masks that deposit plastic particulates deep in your lungs.

Bar after bar, palapa roofs and ceiling fans, open to the great pacific ocean with its diving pelicans, but no relief from the summer of normal Mexican weather. The ceiling fans are too high to have any impact and definitely no air conditioning. “Definitely none,” the waiter confirms.

“Sorry amigo, but I have extra cold Pacifico to help with the heat.” The waiter wants me to stay. Maybe to move to a table after standing at the bar. “I bring a bucket with ice.”

Tired of walking and cruising pharmacies for the cheapest options of prescription drugs that can be snagged without a prescription I finally relent and park myself near a mahogany wood railing with the best view of the bay.

The United States is a failed state I keep telling myself on the flight south. A dozen calls to doctors and urgent care clinics for a simple refill of a medication prescribed in Poland, with a letter from a Polish doctor and not a single place in a large American city would oblige, even with travel insurance so they can overcharge the insurance company as many of those clinics do.

Continue reading . . .