If you’re smart enough to realize bug-eyed dwarf goblin Kash Patel is lying about Epstein’s “suicide,” wait until you find out he was on the National Security Council when it came up with the criminal COVID response.

(Yes, the NSC invented COVID policy, not rat-faced Fauci.) https://t.co/q95skz0Zwf

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) May 19, 2025

This is the REAL STORY of how COVID started in the U.S.—Don't let Deep State shills like Kash Patel gaslight you (1/17 - supporting evidence in thread)

"[COVID wasn't] a pandemic. It [was] a military attack. It [was] a deployment of chemical [and] maybe radiological weapons.

Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Mic Meow (@MicMeowed) how the COVID "pandemic" was actually pulled off in the U.S., highlighting the U.S. military's involvement in the release of a biological (and potentially radiological) weapon, the lack of evidence supporting the existence of a patient zero in the U.S. (or even China), and the rollout of "hospital murder protocols," which were used to generate the deaths needed to make it look like there was a "pandemic" occurring.

"The Department of Defense quickly took over the response to the supposed public health event [i.e., the COVID-19 'pandemic']," Latypova notes at the beginning of the clip, before delving into the timeline of events—which is strongly supported by the available evidence. "The [supposed SARS-CoV-2 'virus'] sequence was posted into GenBank on January 9th, 2020, ostensibly from a Chinese patient[, for whom there is no evidence supporting their existence]." (See tweet 5/17 for supporting evidence of Latypova's claim here.) "The [supposed SARS-CoV-2 'virus'] sequence was posted into GenBank on January 9th [2020]. On January 30th [2020], the CDC claimed that we have a first person in the United States, in Washington State, who was, again, infected with this virus. Again, [there was no] evidence of this person ever existing." (See tweet 4/17 for supporting evidence of this claim.)

(For reference, GenBank is a comprehensive public database that contains annotated collections of all publicly available nucleotide and DNA sequences.)

"On February 4th, there's a phone call—and this is...leaked audio from AstraZeneca executives. There was a phone call placed from the Department of Defense. I believe the person making the phone call was Colonel Matt Hepburn from DARPA," Latypova says. "And he called the consortium of pharmaceutical companies telling them to switch from previously funded pan-influenza ['vaccine'] models to COVID ['vaccine'] models because, and I'm quoting him, 'COVID was declared a national security threat.'" (See tweet 16/17 for supporting evidence.)

"So my question is," Latypova says, "[from] January 30th [2020] to February 4th [2020], we only have one ostensible patient having COVID. [But it's not] clear. Are they ill? Did they die? What happened?"

Latypova goes on to ask rhetorically:

"We have maybe 11 cases—PCR cases—of COVID in the United States [but] somehow, Colonel Matt Hepburn decides to...to say to the entire pharmaceutical consortium, which is over 300 companies, to start working on COVID products because it's a national security threat. Based on what? That's my question: How do you know that?"

Latypova goes on to note:

"What's more interesting...we have a whole series—hours—of Department of Defense press conferences at the Pentagon with media, over the 2020/2021 timeframe, when they were working on Operation Warp Speed. And so they would do these periodic press updates, and they're hilarious and very interesting....I don't recall the date exactly right now, but it was somewhere [in] February, early March, there [was] a press event where, there's Colonel Wendy Sammons-Jackson and a few others. So there's General [Michael J.] Talley, who leads the presentation from the DOD, and there are two or three [other] participants from Fort Detrick, the biolab and, the US Army infectious disease research. And they're all discussing this stuff. And so she [Sammons-Jackson] says specifically, 'Oh, we've received...the pathogen, meaning the COVID virus... and we [meaning the DOD] are growing the stocks of it." (See tweet 2/17 for supporting evidence.) "At that time...I remind you," Latypova adds, "we only had maybe one case; maybe 10 cases or 20 [PCR] cases of this, meaning there was no COVID virus in the US. Yet Colonel Wendy Sammons-Jackson is growing stocks of it. And guess what happens after she's growing stocks of it? We have an explosion of cases and illness in the United States. So how is this a pandemic when nothing happens before they announce it, after they announce it, and tell you we're growing stocks of it, we have a pandemic?"

Latypova concludes:

"So it's [COVID] not a pandemic. It's a military attack. It's a deployment of chemical, maybe radiological weapons. I don't know what they deployed, but they deployed something. There was some weird illness that was going around. [But] it's a deployment. And a majority of the deaths...were caused by, we know, hospital murder protocols—killing people in the hospitals with the protocol that I can walk you through because they tried it on my on my mother-in-law, unsuccessfully. We rescued her." (See tweets 9/17 and 10/17 for supporting evidence of the "hospital murder protocols.")

"And, so I can walk you through that protocol....[I've been] with people testifying [as to] how their loved ones were killed in the exact same manner...[with] remdesivir and with ventilators and, dehydration, starvation, cruelty...Isolation...So those are the deaths. That's how they caused the deaths. They simulated illness with something [else]—some chemical weapon or something. And, the main point of this was to deploy these biological weapons, which are the shots [the COVID injections]."

ZOWE SMITH: They modeled how many people they would have to scare in order to make it look like pandemic

The *most plausible explanation* for the COVID "pandemic" explained:

➡️Not a "virus" release; a deployment of a chemical weapon

➡️The *non-lethal* chem weapon was used to seed "sentinel cases" and stir fear

➡️"Worried well" convinced themselves they were sick

➡️Excess… pic.twitter.com/KcATbuG88V

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) March 15, 2025

The *most plausible explanation* for the COVID-19 "pandemic" explained: Not a "virus" release; a deployment of a chemical weapon The *non-lethal* chem weapon was used to seed "sentinel cases" and stir fear "Worried well" convinced themselves they were sick Excess deaths—prior to the release of the COVID bioweapon injections—were driven by hospital slaughter protocols (including ventilators, remdesivir, isolation, etc.) and, to a lesser extent, the shutdown of society This model, described here in part in a recent discussion between Zowe Smith (

@Zowe_TKMC

) and Sasha Latypova (

@sasha_latypova

), accounts for many disparate pieces of evidence, IMO. Yes, we've had frontline workers report people developing strange symptoms—e.g., "happy hypoxia"—so *something* novel was introduced. However, no "virus" was ever isolated, including for the CDC's own PCR "test." Whatever was released was not lethal (or, essentially, non-lethal), as we now know 90%+ of excess deaths were due to lethal hospital protocols (including remdesivir/ventilation/isolation/etc). I base the above 90% figure on the work John Beaudoin has done looking at death certificates; plus the fact that we have myriad medical whistleblowers who have stepped forward and said that it hasn't been "COVID" killing people, it has been **the COVID protocols themselves.** Furthermore, as Latypova notes elsewhere in this discussion, "lab leaks" happen all the time—if they could result in "pandemics," we'd be getting a lot more of them. In this clip, Smith also shows footage of Dr. James Giordano, PhD, a former US Naval officer and the Pellegrino Center Professor in the Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry at Georgetown University Medical Center, who was a member of the Neuroethics, Legal, and Social Issues Advisory Panel at DARPA. Giordano, who has become internet-famous (infamous?) for his talks on various brain-hacking and biotech devices, describes (in essence) a pandemic scare using the deployment of "high-morbidity neural microbiologic agents" or "neural bugs." (Note: "high-morbidity" not "high-mortality.") While Giordano explains using, in essence, a gain-of-function "bug" to produce "sentinel cases" for a pandemic scare, note that Latypova says that "most of the things he mention[s] [are] intoxication agents or chemicals." The pharma insider adds, "chemical attacks...are more reliable than biologics attacks...[and] all these [naturally occurring biological agents] no matter what you do with them in the labs...quickly denature outside; or even indoors, exposed to air, and normal circulation and so forth." Note that this is supported by the work of none other than Ralph Baric. Baric, for example, concluded in a now-infamous paper published in 2016, dubbed "SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence," that: "Focusing on the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-like viruses, the results indicate that the WIV1-coronavirus (CoV) cluster has the ability to directly infect and may undergo limited transmission in human populations. However, in vivo attenuation suggests additional adaptation is required for epidemic disease." In other words, Baric et al., tried to make a GOF virus, but it petered out too quickly to qualify for "epidemic disease" potential. Furthermore, note that Giordano doesn't describe a real "pandemic" or even epidemic—he only describes introducing "sentinel cases" at "key sites" (like Des Moines, Seattle, Houston, etc.) and then "[rippling] the sheets of the worried well" in order to "get every hypochondriac running to their physician." Also, perhaps the most salient point: If the intention behind the COVID scam was to maim/slaughter/sterilize humanity en masse (and of course it was), why rely on a worldwide "vaccination" campaign if massive damage was doable with a GOF "virus"?  

The injections are bioweapons. The GOF "virus" is the scary narrative (seeded with a chemical weapons release) that got people to line up and stick the poison needles in their arms. 

JOHN BEAUDOIN: 80% of COVID deaths were fraud

(2/5) Here's a thread describing how doctors and nurses are slaughtering Americans in the hospitals using the remdesivir+ventilator murder protocol.

Based on death certs, John Beaudoin estimates 500K+ Americans have been killed this way. https://t.co/wk0Yz7wQhb

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) December 20, 2024

REMDESIVIR—VENTILATORS —ISOLATION—AND THE 'HOSPITAL HOMICIDE' OF MORE THAN 500,000 AMERICANS SINCE 2020

Here's a reminder that hospitals have been turned into "killing fields" since the beginning of COVID, deploying deadly protocols that have murdered 500K+ Americans. 🧵 (1/16)… pic.twitter.com/k6Wjtc7ByV

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) June 8, 2024

But I can tell you there are really two, two general patterns that really need to be looked at whereas a whole group is looking at what they call a vaccine there is another group looking at hospital homicides and I have to tell you unfortunately that it's both, in fact, the hospital homicides might be greater the acute renal failure so the sudden kidney failure where you didn't have a problem before and all of a sudden you have a problem seems to be occurring mostly in the hospital and it's occurring to the tune of about 100% increase and not during the year of covid but rather the when covid I should say when the CMS.gov.  and NCTAP program kicked in that's on the web you can find it at CMS.gov and look for NCTAP 

ZOWE SMITH: COVID-19 pneumonia is almost identical to kidney damage caused by Remdesivir

It's very common for them to give you drugs that will shut down your kidneys while in the hospital.  These are some serious drugs that they give you while you're in there. --Zowe Smith

"Remdesivir [is] also known as 'Run Death is Near'...And this is one of the keys to how the pandemic was pulled off; how it was made to look like there was a deadly, contagious pandemic going on...[when] there was [actually] an epidemic of...doctors murdering people..."

Medical… pic.twitter.com/tlIWfANe4e

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) December 4, 2024

The speaker is Zowe Smith.  Her Twitter/X feed is here.

So Remdesivir was also known as "Run, death is near," and it earned that name for a very good reason.  And this was one of the keys to how the pandemic was pulled off, how it was made to look like there was a deadly, contagious pandemic going on.  I would say there was an epidemic of malpractice and doctors murdering people, and this is how they did it.

00:31.  So your doctor during the pandemic was told that COVID-19 causes pneumonia, run X-rays, and check for pneumonia.  

Your doctor was also told by the National Kidney Foundation, as you can see here, the official advice on COVID-19 is that it causes kidney failure.  So your doctor thinks that if you get COVID-19, you will develop pneumonia, and you will develop acute kidney injury, which is another way of saying kidney failure without the chronic portion.  So it's acute; it comes on in a short period of time.  That is what your doctor thought the disease process of COVID-19 was going to do without any sort of intervention.  in my hospital, the protocol miraculously had an informed consent part.  They had two consults . . . had to be done [by] a renal doctor and an internal medicine physician.  They had to see the patient they had to screen the patient for kidney conditions because they knew that Remdesivir could cause kidney damage.  They said damage, not failure in the documentation, but this is all in your medical record on the permission form saying they know that it can cause kidney damage.  And so they screened patients.  If patients had poor kidney function to begin with, they would be disqualified.  If they thought that the kidneys could withstand the drug, they told the patient, "We will monitor kidney function.  And if your kidney function drops while you're being infused with this drug, we will pull the drug and that will be that."  

02:07.  Well, as they gave Remdesivir and it caused acute kidney injury, the kidneys are responsible for maintaining fluid balance in the body, cleaning the blood, but also maintaining fluid balance.  So when your kidneys begin to fail and you can't urinate, the fluid backs up. It tends to back up in the abdomen first.  That's the first place doctors are going to look for that fluid.  It's called ascites generally.  And it can sometimes get up into the chest cavity.  It can go through the diaphragm and get into the chest cavity.  When that happens, you can see this chest X-ray on the right-hand side, which shows pulmonary edema.  This is a chest x-ray of someone who was diagnosed with pulmonary edema, which is liquid that has been pushed into the chest cavity area.  COVID-19 pneumonia is on the left-hand side and you can see it looks almost identical.  So this is how physicians thought that everything that they were doing was just trying to treat the disease process, which was COVID-19, which causes kidney failure and leads to pneumonia, and then they would put you on a ventilator when you developed pneumonia, and finish you off.  

03:18.  This is how your doctor thought that nothing they were doing was causing this this was just the disease process of COVID-19 however Remdesivir let itself into other organ failure and COVID-19 pneumonia which then qualified patients to be put on ventilators were then given a deadly concoction of more drugs which further shut down their system and it was a death sentence that very few people escaped from. 

03:48.  This is an infographic by one of the previous guests on this podcast, John Beaudoin, the author of The Real CDC.  This is the best infographic on how the hospital protocols actually worked out and the timing, which I find really interesting especially after we've gone over the timing of that bonus of the Remdesivir new tech thing that happened on August 1, 2020.  So I'd like to draw your attention to the timing of this you can see there's a big dark red line at the end of 2020 and that is when the line starts to go up of increased acute kidney injury excess deaths.  So another important piece of information a lot of people are not aware of, acute kidney injury happens in hospitals quite frequently.  That's why this is already not at zero and it didn't just go up in 2020. It's very common for them to give you drugs that will shut down your kidneys while in the hospital.  These are some serious drugs that they give you while you're in there.  But at the end of 2020, you can see that it began to slightly tick up and that coincided with the new tech bonus which was rolled out.  So I believe in 2020 at the very beginning when it was a ghost town and we didn't have that many cases, then we began to open up society and everyone's required to mask everywhere, which made them sicker.  That's about the time that the new tech bonus was rolled out.  That's about the time that acute kidney injury excess deaths began to go up.  And then in 2021, when the vaccine was rolled out you see that number just goes exponential, and it gets out of control.  And that coincided, you know, coincidence isn't causation here, but that coincided with the vaccine that came out in 2021.  And as the movie, Vaxxed 3: Authorized to Kill, points out, unvaccinated patients were being discriminated against and were being targeted for these protocols so I find that piece of information to be important to consider this information in the graph as well.  The COIVD Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, Zowe Smith, 2024.

The COVID Code: My Life in the Thrill KIll Medical Cult https://t.co/AUGgKujllQ via @amazon

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) December 5, 2024

JAY SCOTT TO RFK, JR.: Never would I have thought I’d see you supporting a lobbyist who supports the interests of big pharma (including Pfizer and the manufacturer of remdesivir), China, and an Israeli cyber weapons company

I mea it's not like Team Trump is executing 5th Generation warfare against the American people, nah! 

Not gonna lie, I’m starting to wonder where your head is at. Never would I have thought I’d see you supporting a lobbyist who supports the interests of big pharma (including Pfizer and the manufacturer of remdesivir), China, and an Israeli cyber weapons company that works with… https://t.co/ZN6EhBieTi

— Jay Scott (@JSAscension) November 8, 2024

Meet Trump’s new Chief of Staff Susie Wiles.

She’s an ex-PHARMA lobbyist: pic.twitter.com/mZQNjcwK1F

— Shannon Joy (@ShannonJoyRadio) November 8, 2024

HRVOJE MORIC: "The whole theory for "two weeks to flatten the curve" comes from eugenicists," whistleblower and former medical coder Zowe Smith explains

It's critical to acknowledge the COVID scam/crime against humanity has been a major *EUGENICS PROGRAM*.

"The whole theory for two weeks to flatten the curve comes from eugenicists," whistleblower and former medical coder Zowe Smith (@Zowe_TKMC) explains for Hrvoje Morić… pic.twitter.com/ZzmfYMuz3S

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) November 1, 2024

It's critical to acknowledge the COVID scam/crime against humanity has been a major *EUGENICS PROGRAM*. "The whole theory for two weeks to flatten the curve comes from eugenicists," whistleblower and former medical coder Zowe Smith (

@Zowe_TKMC

) explains for Hrvoje Morić (

@HrvojePM

) of Geopolitics and Empire (@Geopolitics_Emp). "The whole [ICD-10] code system comes out of a whole group of people that were in a club called the Eugenics Society, but they were also in a statistical society, and there was a revolving door between the two." (The ICD-10 code system is an international classification used for categorizing diagnoses, symptoms, and procedures in healthcare for statistical reporting, billing, and research.) "And the same families, the same names pop up from...the very beginning of the eugenics movement tied all the way back to sir Francis Galton, the guy who came up with it [eugenics], all the way to now," Smith says. "I was looking at it [COVID] through [how] the medical system is being exploited, and this genocide is being hidden through these [ICD-10] numbers. So why is it being hidden through these numbers? Come to find out, Bill Gates is a big player in this. He was a big player in IBM...[And] he's got some really nefarious ties with Planned Parenthood, his dad being in there, which goes straight back to eugenics. He's also tied in with Rockefeller." "I talk about how Rockefeller took over Western medicine in the book [The Covid Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult] and how he was involved in eugenics. Many people who have studied eugenics have realized that not only were a lot of people involved in it, and it was normal at one point, but these people had a revolving door between other organizations," the whistleblower adds. "It was almost a club where the same people show up doing the same things over time. And so...what happened during World War 2, the main conception is America came in and saved the day, and we stopped the holocaust of the Jews, and now it's bad to be racist, and eugenics is bad, and it's all over now. We stopped it. But that's not true. It went underground, and it came over to America. And the part that most people don't understand, it was funded by America to begin with." Smith notes, "It never stopped. It just morphed into something else, but it's still the same people. It's still Gates. It's still Rockefeller. It's still the Warburgs. It's still the Rothschilds. It's still those same families that are at the top of the WEF, the WHO, all of these regulatory agencies, all the governments that did this to us. So, yes, this is a democide." She adds, "The statistical coding system [the ICD-10 system] that they use to exploit this and enact COVID all across the world because the WHO, every member state has to use these codes. That's what they mandate. It's been their mission to make everybody comply to this generalization, standardization, centralization for the purposes of monitoring their eugenics programs." Partial transcription of clip: "Ultimately, I think COVID-1984 was a a multi-pronged attack. I don't think it was just the vaccines. I think that was a major linchpin in it obviously, but I don't think it was the only one. I think the PCR test was part of it. The lockdowns were part of it, and the psychological warfare was part of it. There's so many layers of it. "And once you understand a psychopath, you know they're not gonna use one thing. They're gonna use multiple things, and they could scare you about a lot of things. They might not do everything they're gonna say they're gonna do, but it's it doesn't mean that they have, you know, one thing and only one thing. And I think a lot of people who are trying to research this, you know, they find, oh, it's the PCR test. That was what did it. Or they find the Remdesivir and then, oh, that was what did it. Or they'll find the ventilator and say, that was it. But I think it was all of those things. And, ultimately, I think it was a eugenics project, and I did not expect to find that. When I decided they were using the codes to game the numbers. There's the COVID-19 code, which recategorized everything and incentivized everything, and I thought, okay. If this is a linchpin that they're using, the platform that they're using to exploit what's going on, there's a reason for that. The people who set this up did this intentionally. "So who did it and why? And the beginning of the ICD-10 code book, it has about, you know, I don't know how many, but a whole bunch of alphabet agencies, the WHO, the AMA, the CDC, all, you know, the alphabet agencies. Those are the ones that created the international code system. And it says these are the people responsible for the official coding guidelines, the rules for how to apply this statistical monitoring system. So I went all the way down to the bottom of the rabbit hole, and I found, wow. The whole theory for the "two weeks to flatten the curve" comes from eugenicists. The whole code system comes out of a whole group of people that were in a club called the Eugenics Society, but they were also in a statistical society, and there was a revolving door between the two. "And the same families, the same names pop up from then, which is the very beginning of the eugenics movement tied all the way back to sir Francis Galton, the guy who came up with it, all the way to now. And Etienne will tell you this too in his book Solving COVID because he found the same information from a different angle. I was looking at it through the medical system is being exploited, and this genocide is being hidden through these numbers. So why is it being hidden through these numbers? Come to find out, Bill Gates is a big player in this. He was a big player in IBM, at you know, going all the way back to World War 2. He's got some really nefarious ties with Planned Parenthood, his dad being in there, which goes straight back to eugenics. He's also tied in with Rockefeller. "I talk about how Rockefeller took over Western medicine in the book and how he was involved in eugenics. Many people who have studied eugenics have realized that, not only were a lot of people involved in it, and it was normal at one point, but these people had a revolving door between other organizations. And it was almost a club where the same people show up doing the same things over time. And so you're exactly right. What happened during World War 2, the main conception is America came in and saved the day, and we, you know, stopped the holocaust of the Jews, and now it's bad to be racist, and eugenics is bad, and it's all over now. We stopped it. But that's not true. It went underground, and it came over to America. And the part that most people don't understand, it was funded by America to begin with. "So it never stopped. It just morphed into something else, but it's still the same people. It's still Gates. It's still Rockefeller. It's still the Warburgs. It's still the Rothschilds. It's still those same families that are at the top of the WEF, the WHO, all of these regulatory agencies, all the governments that did this to us. So, yes, this is a democide. This is an intentional thing, and a lot of people will say, for various reasons, they write this down and they explain what they're gonna do to you. And when you look at some of the documents, there are programs, there are experiments, there are simulations that they've run. There are statements that put in writing, saying, basically, "We're trying to kill you." I mean, they don't put it in those words, but as you go through and you unpack each one and you read, you know, in between the lines, it's clear. "And then realizing, wow. Okay. So the statistical coding system that they use to exploit this and enact COVID all across the world because the WHO, every member state has to use these codes. That's what they mandate. It's been their mission to make everybody comply to this generalization, standardization, centralization for the purposes of monitoring their eugenics programs."

  ffggggg

SHARYL ATTKISSON: Whistleblower: Remdesivir linked to 601 military deaths

(READ) Whistleblower: Remdesivir linked to 601 military deaths https://t.co/Mm52ivcIVY

— Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋 (@SharylAttkisson) October 12, 2024

A military whistleblower has released documents, known as “The Remdesivir Papers,” revealing that 601 military service members died after being treated with the controversial antiviral drug Remdesivir for suspected COVID-19 cases. The documents claim the drug was administered months before it was approved by the FDA, with serious concerns about data manipulation and lack of informed consent in the trials.

The whistleblower, using the pseudonym Daniel LeMay, shared the documents with investigative journalist J.M. Phelps, exposing that many trial results were kept secret and highlighting remdesivir’s potential role in hundreds of untimely deaths. According to LeMay, the Department of Defense’s Joint Trauma System manipulated trial data to favor remdesivir, and participants were often not informed about the risks involved.

Advocacy groups and former victims of COVID-19 hospital protocols, including those involving  Remdesivir, have expressed outrage, calling for greater accountability. Gail Seiler, a survivor of remdesivir treatment, stated that the papers “only scratch the surface” of the harm caused by the drug in both military and civilian hospitals.

All of the information here needs to be made public, and the public officials, including Tony Fauci, need to be held to account for the criminal acts associated with the fraudulent trials of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine that were tainted in order to preclude their use, and making remdesivir the standard of care despite the obvious data showing that it kills people.“

Brian Hooker, Ph.D., Chief Scientific Officer, Children’s Health Defense.  

as one person told me, "My daughter was worth more dead than alive," and they took her.

This is called DEMOCIDE. It was ordered by The DOD. @sasha_latypova will explain to you that these were premeditated murders committed by The US Govn't under the Biden/Harris administration. They were the 2 serial killers who MANDATED the BIO-WEAPONS.  https://t.co/1jSvkXg7tb https://t.co/i8LF4cvWdF

— Faith Dyson (@FaithDyson16) September 24, 2024

These people were going into hospital [and] they had not taken the COVID-19 shot.  This is really important because every single person that sat on that bus or virtual story, I asked them the question, "First of all, did you take the COVID-19 shot?"  No, they did not.  And it was becoming increasingly clear that the "unvaccinated," as they're called, were being targeted and they were being killed.  And the people speaking to me used the word "murder."  It seems to me like you came into a hospital, and the first question they asked was, "Did you take the shot?"  And if they said yes, they did take a shot, they went and got different treatments.  The ones who did not take the shot, the "unvaccinated," went straight into [a protocol of] Remdesivir, ventilation, fentanyl, a cocktail of drugs, and killed on those ventilators over and over again.

00:47. Okay that's a very strong accusation but let me add to it.  I've interviewed other guests, lawyers, who have pointed out that the hospitals were financially incentivized to produce COVID-19-related deaths because some of them received, in California, as much as $500,000 per death if someone was diagnosed with coded beforehand.  Do you think that that kind of financial incentive played a role in this flow chart that you're describing right now?

01:15. 100%.  We have coded and whistleblowers, people working inside the hospital, telling us that they were just jabbing people for this COVID-19 test, and they would keep going over and over again till they got a positive.  And the minute they got a positive, tick that box.  That's some money.  On to the next thing, Remdesivir, big tick for that.  And they were showing us on the death medical records how much they were getting paid for every single drug and cocktail and equipment that was used on them.  And it was half a million dollars plus per person.  Big money.  And as one person told me, "My daughter was worth more dead than alive," and they took her.

ZOWE SMITH: Patients on ventilators for over 30 days [hospitals got] over $1 million . . .

"In 11 years of medical coding I've never seen a case of pneumonia that ended up with massive organ failure, ventilator for 30 days, and death...it all happened around the COVID [testing/bonuses.]"

"Patients were on ventilators for over 30 days...[that's]...over $1 million..."… pic.twitter.com/M4n7vwT8Iq

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) September 15, 2024

 "In 11 years of medical coding I've never seen a case of pneumonia that ended up with massive organ failure, ventilator for 30 days, and death...it all happened around the COVID [testing/bonuses.]"

"Patients were on ventilators for over 30 days...[that's]...over $1 million..." Medical whistleblower, author, and former medical coder Zowe Smith (

@Zowe_TKMC

) describes for Weezy on the What is TRUTH? PODCAST (@WhatTruthPod) how hospital protocols changed once COVID testing and bonuses were implemented due to the CARES Act. (Which was signed into law by President Trump in March 2020.) "If you go through the CARES Act line by line, you're not gonna see something that says, 'If you put a patient on a ventilator, you get a 20 percent bonus.' However, if you understand the payment system of coding, it's there," Smith says. The whistleblower adds that patients who were put on a ventilator for 96+ hours were placed into the highest payment category. "If your DRG [diagnosis related group] was COVID and you're on a ventilator, you get a 20 percent bonus just for having COVID, and then you also get the bonus because you're bumped into the highest paying category for that diagnosis related group because of the ventilator use," Smith adds. Furthermore, the whistleblower notes that "there was [also a] bonus for [use of] Remdesivir." "They considered Remdesivir a new-tech drug and it was Gilead, Fauci, and the NIH that developed Remdesivir and decided we should be using it...So every single dose, every individual dose that they gave you of Remdesivir, gets them a 20 percent bonus. So that was hella money for them [the hospitals]." Indeed, Smith notes that these bonuses were the saving grace of hospitals who were in severe need of revenue, as the COVID "lockdowns" in 2020 starved them of patients. "Imagine being bankrupt and all of a sudden you see all these bonuses coming at you. If you're a hospital admin and you're responsible for the financial health of that hospital, and you see all these bonuses coming in, I bet you're gonna be telling your other buddies in admin to use those those protocols so you can get those bonuses so you can keep the doors open." Smith adds: "During the scamdemic, especially before the vaccine, I think they were practicing these hospital protocols that were killing people. Because before COVID, if you came in with pneumonia or cold or flu, you would you'd be home within 3 days probably. You almost never be put on a ventilator. We never treated it like that. There's never been I've never seen in 11 years of medical coding, I've never seen a case of pneumonia that ended up with massive organ failure, ventilator for 30 days. So something very, very different happened and it all happened around the COVID testing and the COVID bonuses." Partial transcription of clip: "Because patients were on ventilators for over 30 days, some of them. So that's an extremely long stay. That all I mean, that's very rare to have a stay like that, and they're almost all over a million dollars when you get to a stay that's that long. "And and when you couple that with. So, yeah, I believe it was up to 30,000 dollars in just bonuses, like, on top of their regular payment. Because what so this is kind what what people don't understand about the bonuses and and one of the things that I can't explain really well about bonuses is the ventilator bonus. So if you go through the CARES Act line by line, you're not gonna see something that says, if you put a patient on a ventilator, you get a 20 percent bonus. However, if you understand the payment system of coding, it's there. So, it for an inpatient, it goes to what's called IPPS, which is inpatient prospective payment system. It's a Medicare system. DRG means diagnosis related group. So what they do what Medicare's done is data mined all of these diseases. They've data mined all the treatments that it takes, and they've come up with, like, an average or a standard of care. And so they're like, a DRG for a heart attack, for example, they're gonna say these are the average day is x amount of days. "The average treatment is, you know, bypass CT scan, these certain labs, whatever, you know, kind of standard treatment it is, you know, whatever the drug standard treatment is. They know the average cost of all of that. And so they'll say, okay. This is the basic charge we're gonna pay you for that. So for an inpatient stay, they can't nickel and dime you for everything.

So you're not gonna see a charge for every single lab they do. You're not gonna see a charge for, you know, every single drug they give you or every band-aid they put on you like you will on an outpatient case because those are all individually charged if you're an outpatient.

When you're an inpatient, it's all, like, one bulk payment. So they've averaged out what all of this is, and they have a 3-tier payment system. "So for a heart attack, there will be, like, level 1, which is the lowest, level 2 where you get, like, a cc, which is called the comorbidity. You get more payment for that. And the third high or third one is the highest tier, and that's where you have the MCC or a major comorbidity, and that will get you the the highest payment that you can for that diagnosis. So ventilators are broken into the code itself, the procedure is broken into 3 different times. It's broken into less than 24 hours. That puts you in the lowest tier. Above 24 hours to 96 hours, that puts you in the middle tier for the CC. And then if you're over 96 hours on a ventilator, doesn't matter how many more days after that, there's one procedure code for over 96 hours.

"And, that will put you in the highest payment category. So they were getting 20 percent bonuses on top of their DRG. So if your DRG was COVID and you're on a ventilator, you get a 20 percent bonus just for having COVID, and then you also get the bonus because you're bumped into the highest paying category for that diagnosis related group because of the ventilator use.

And then there was the bonus for the Remdesivir. So there's something called new technology and when a new technology code comes out, it's a new procedure that we haven't done. Medicare hasn't data mined all this information. So it's considered high risk. So they're they usually pay a lot higher because this is kind of it's considered experimental until they have years and years of data saying what safety is. "So they considered Remdesivir a new tech drug and it was Gilead, Fauci, and the NIH that developed Remdesivir and decided we should be using it. What was Gilead that applied for the new tech bonus? So every single dose, every individual dose that they gave you of Remdesivir gets them a 20 percent bonus. So that was hella money for them. So imagine being bankrupt and all of a sudden you see all these bonuses coming at you. If you're hospital admin and you're responsible for the financial health of that hospital, and you see all these bonuses coming in, I bet you're gonna be telling your other buddies in admin to use those those protocols so you can get those bonuses so you can keep the doors open. "So...during the scamdemic, especially before the vaccine, I think they were practicing these hospital protocols that were killing people. Because before COVID, if you came in with pneumonia or cold or flu, you would you'd be home within 3 days probably. You almost never be put on a ventilator. We never treated it like that. There's never been I've never seen in 11 years of medical coding, I've never seen a case of pneumonia that ended up with massive organ failure, ventilator for 30 days. So something very, very different happened and it all happened around the COVID testing and the COVID bonuses."

 

27:35. So you don't have freedom of speech unless you get standing in court to address the violation that I am committing against you.  So freedom of speech only exists and freedom of assembly only exists and freedom of religion only exists in that you have the right to go to the government and enforce orderly Society.  Without the right to redress the Grievances you don't have the other rights that's why it's so foundational in my opinion I haven't heard this anywhere this is my kind of on track This Is My Philosophy of Law that that is the most foundational right.

28:13  Civil society breaks down without the ability to address things in court. If you can't get Justice in the court, you get it in the streets.  That's where we are headed because the courts are so broken and they won't hear cases.  "The claim is not plausible on its face."  This phrase is used all the time all three of my cases are dismissed based on standing, based on.  Missouri and Texas against Pennsylvania got dismissed on standing using

28:55. I'm going to get into that now using my case and I'm going to go through the "Three Prongs of Lujan." BTW, this is a Substack it's my first circuit Court of Appeals opening brief I don't write like a lawyer you'll see some stuff that a lawyer would never write because they would probably lose their license they would definitely be hated aware of it yeah John's substack is called COQUIN DE CHEN, French for "naughty dog" or "bad dog."  Steve Kerr said I can't promote you if you're going to have that as your avatar. 

A couple of Latin phrases:

1)  "Lex injusta non est lex," an unjust law is no law at all.  We're looking at natural law here, and as Congress creates a law that is adverse to the Constitution then you have a right to break that law.

2)  "Malam consilium quod mutari non protest," bad is the plan that cannot change.  If you set out a plan, you're 10% into your plan, and you realize, "Oh boy, the outcome is going to be worse than where we were then at the beginning."  Well, what are you going to do?  You're going to change your plan.  Well, the problem is they created a plan in March 2020.  Oh, they're not changing.  The plan, oh, unfortunately, they're just incompetent.  It's like, no, the plan is going as they planned it to be always.  They're doing well according to their plan.  I say "Malam consilium quod mutari non protest," because the people out there should realize that wait a minute they recommended Remdesivir on April 21, 2020, and they're still recommending it now.  They talk about a study that occurred in March, April, and May 2020 and that's it and they never looked at it again.  

With those in mind let's make a change else being slave by tyrants enabled by cowards.

Okay here's my case against the governor, the public health commissioner, individual medical examiners, and the Chief Medical Examiner.  Okay here's the argument: Three Prongs of Lujan.  I said Injury In Fact.  The words that they use are generalized grievance.  My case is a "Generalized grievance."  I just read to you what Article III was.  It doesn't have anything in there about standing.  So what does Lujan say about it?  Lujan says it must be "Concrete and particularized."  Your complaint must be concrete and particularized well who decides that?  It's another subjective decision of the judge.. what you're going to see and I'll just tell you you're going to see all these terms that are legal terms that are used in every case and in the adjudication of every legal term it's subjective, subjective, subjective, and subjective.  So the first test of inquiry of Lujan is "Concrete and particularized," so I was very particular in my claimed injury.  Basically I got thrown out of Law School; not just that, I couldn't get into any other law school.  Why?  Because they enacted vaccine mandates.  Why did they enact vaccine mandates?  Because the state said that everybody was dying from COVID-19 and that the vaccine will save you from COVID-19 and that the vaccine is safe and effective.  All of those were lies, and I intend to prove that if I ever get heard in a substantive argument in a case.  I intend to prove that these people didn't die from COVID-19.  Most of them are lies.  I show in the evidence, in Exhibit F of my case: blunt force trauma to the head; blunt force trauma to the torso; fentanyl overdose, all called COVID-19.  I have vaccine deaths where people died within hours of the vaccine and they called them COVID-19 deaths.  This is the irrefutable proof that I have that you won't find in research papers that are bantered about and debated on every podcast.  I don't do research papers.  I give you hard facts that any jury, any judges, any layman can understand.  I just can't be heard because I was dismissed on standing.  So my injury being "concrete and particularized," that's to say that I did get thrown out of Law School.  I did lose the $28,000 I spent for the first year I did lose a year of my life studying law and I'll never be a lawyer, or get a law degree because I'm 60 now.  Should I go back?  I don't know, but yeah so there's definitely 

35:00. John, on that question yes you should I have a friend of mine whose grandfather after being a dentist until 87 years of age went back to law school at 87 and graduated at the age of 94 and practiced law 'til he died when he was 105 in Peru.  So there you go

I would agree with you otherwise, where otherwise means my dad and his dad didn't see 70.  So I don't have a lot of time.  Maybe I'll live to be a 100.  Chances are very low.  I won't get into medical stuff, but I hear you.  I might go back, Charles

JOHN BEAUDOIN: "The CARES Act, like I said, [was about] behavior modification. It was never intended to save anybody...In fact, the CARES Act was written in 2018...It was finalized in 2019."

"The CARES Act, like I said, [was about] behavior modification. It was never intended to save anybody...In fact, the CARES Act was written in 2018...It was finalized in 2019."

Electrical engineer and independent investigator John Beaudoin, Sr. (@JohnBeaudoinSr) describes for… pic.twitter.com/OJCoQM41j0

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) August 6, 2024

"The CARES Act, like I said, [was about] behavior modification. It was never intended to save anybody...In fact, the CARES Act was written in 2018...It was finalized in 2019." Electrical engineer and independent investigator John Beaudoin, Sr. (

@JohnBeaudoinSr

) describes for Debi Evans of UK Column (

@ukcolumn

) how the CARES Act— a $2.2 trillion economic stimulus bill passed by the 116th U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Donald Trump on March 27, 2020—was all about "behavior modification" and "never intended to save anybody." In fact, Beaudoin notes that the bill was written in 2018, and then finalized in 2019. Partial transcription of clip: "The CARES Act, like I said, is a behavior modification. It was never intended to save anybody. Nothing in there has anything to save anybody or to give money to the states so that the states could save anybody. Everything in there is a modification of behavior of hospital administrators to kill people for money, to use ventilators, to prescribe remdesivir, to make sure that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are not used.  

"So, yeah, the laws that [were] put in place were never intended to save anybody. In fact, the CARES Act was written in 2018. Twenty-eighteen. They changed a few variables. It was finalized in 2019. And when COVID hit, they changed a few variables in March of 2020. So the intent was never to save a lot of people." 

Full video: