DR. WILLIAM DAVIS: That's why children can get impaired immunity because they consume a lot of grains that they become zinc deficient; that impairs your immune response.

A really good little video here from Dr. William Davis, the author of wheat belly and super gut. Oats & Oatmeal- is it good for you? Here’s the low down. https://t.co/n826KydGuw

— Wejolyn 🇺🇸 (@Wejolyn) April 2, 2025

Oats are a rich source of beta-glucan, a source of soluble fiber.  It's this feature that allows them to be called "heart healthy." that upon consumption does indeed reduce "total" and LDL cholesterol.  

And while I poo-poo those kinds of crude measurements, that is true that they can be modestly beneficial.  

So what's the problem?  Oats like all other grains are seeds of grasses.  They're all seeds of grasses.  By definition, that's what grains are.  They all share a carbohydrate called Amylopectin A.  Amylopectin A is the super carbohydrate of grain.  I call it a super carbohydrate because the Amylopectin A of grains yields rise in blood sugar even worse than table sugar.  That's because we have an enzyme called amylase in our saliva and in our stomachs that's very efficient at ingesting amylopectin A, and that explains why, for instance, two slices of whole wheat bread raises blood sugar higher than 6 tsp of table sugar.  The same kind of phenomenon applies to oats because it's rich in Amylopectin A.  

There are other forms of Amylopectin. Beans, legumes, for instance, are rich in Amylopectin C, which is not efficiently digested.  It's inefficiently digested.  It does not raise blood sugar very much, unless you consume a lot.  But the Amylopectin A of grains, the seeds of grasses, is very efficiently digested and yields a sharp and substantial rise in blood sugar.  So if you ate oatmeal, let's say one cup of uncooked oatmeal or slow cooked or no added sugar, no sweeteners, no fruit nothing just plain oatmeal, a typical blood sugar response in a non-diabetic person would be a rise of blood pressure, say, from 90 or 100 to 150 to 180 mg per deciliter; in other words,very high.  

02:11.  What are the consequences of that?  Whenever blood sugar ranges that high, it does all sorts of things.  It provokes insulin resistance.  If it's repeated over time, it causes growth of visceral fat, that is tummy fat, and weight gain, and it induces something called glycation.  Glycation is irreversible glucose modification of proteins.  So if you glycate the proteins in the lenses of your eyes, you get cataracts over time.  If you glycate the cartilage cells and proteins in your knees and hips, you get brittle cartilage that leads to arthritis and bone-on-bone arthritis.  If you glycate LDL particles, you get heart disease.  If you glycate the skin, you get skin thinning, age spots, and accelerated skin aging.  So glycation is a very, very important process to know about.  

And how do you cause glycation and endogenous glycation? By having high glucose every time blood glucose ranges above 100 you glycate more and more and more so that blood sugar of 150 to 180 in a diabetic after consuming oatmeal is not a good idea.  If you have insulin resistance, pre-diabetes, diabetes, a typical blood sugar could be 200 to 350, sometimes higher, sky high blood sugars because of the Amylopectin A.  That one cup of uncooked oatmeal that you slow cooked yields about 46 grams net carbs which is an awful lot.  You know, my Wheat Belly and Undoctored Programs, we restrict ourselves to no more than 15 grams net carbs per meal because that's the level at which there's little to no rise in blood sugar, and we don't generate insulin resistance.  We have virtually no acceleration of glycation, but that one cup of oatmeal yields 46 grams net carbs.  Now people often add slices of bananas, right, berries, some sweeteners, milk, now you're talking about 65, 70, 80, 90 net carbs, and all those adverse effects are further amplified.  Oats have also been associated provocation of type 1 diabetes those data are observational, and thereby not real solid.  But there is better evidence to show us that the gliadin protein of wheat and Zein protein of corn are powerful provokers of the process that leads to type 1 diabetes in kids.  So even though the data are still limited with oats and observational, it's so consistent with what we know with related proteins, and by the way, those proteins are called Prolamin protein.  The avenin proteins of Oats the glaidin proteins of wheat sequin protein of rye Zein of corn these are all called prolamine proteins and they are called that because they're rich in the amino acid, Proline.  And amino acid sequences that include Proline are often not well digested by the enzymes we have in our digestive tracts.  That's part of the reason why we get autoimmune effects from consumption of the seeds of grasses.  Oats are rich in fungal mycotoxins this has been a perennial problem with oats that they seem to be a good place to grow fungi that's why mushroom Farmers often grow them in oats the oatmeal you buy the oats you buy are often contaminated by fungal mycotoxins at sometimes toxic levels and these are carcinogenic and other toxic properties so oats are source a common source of fungal mycotoxins.  The avenin protein of oats can mimic the gliadin protein of wheat and reigniting celiac disease this is similar in to the way that the Zein protein of corn can reignite celiac disease.  People with celiac disease are told to be gluten-free and to eat gluten-free foods.  One of the most common ingredients in gluten-free foods is cornstarch.  Now that's the starch of corn, not the protein, but the corn starch is often contaminated with the Zein proteins.  So all those products made with gluten-free ingredients, like cornstarch, can also reignite the celiac disease.  Likewise, the avenin protein of oats can reignite celiac disease in some people with celiac disease.  Oats also, like many other grains, or seeds of grasses, contain something called phytates.  And phytates are very good at binding positively charged minerals like iron, zinc, calcium, magnesium, copper, manganese, and when the phytates of grains, say from a bowl of oatmeal, or a sandwich made with two slices of whole wheat bread, the phytates bind those positively charged minerals, most of them, and you pass it out in the toilet.  That's why, for instance, there's lots and lots of iron deficiency anemia in people who consume a lot of grains.  That's why children can get impaired immunity because they consume a lot of grains that they become zinc deficient; that impairs your immune response.  That's why a lot of people get skin rashes from consuming grains because it binds all the zinc.  So multiple nutritional deficiencies developed from the consumption of Oats as they do with other grains.

07:15.  Lastly oats can be a common source of allergy the allergy can show up as asthma it can show up as gastrointestinal upset it can show up as skin rashes now skin rashes can occur from oral consumption or from topical application of of creams and other products that contain oats it's very common in children for instance so oats do have something good in them the better glucan soluble fiber unfortunately it comes with two much bad baggage, like the Amylopectin A that raises blood sugar and Insulin; the fungal mycotoxins; provocation of the celiac disease; phytates; and others.  This is very common.  There's no way to disable the adverse effects of seeds of grasses because seeds of grasses, if you ran into a field and you and your family were starving, and you ran into a field of grass, would you say "Hallelujah!  We eat well tonight!" Probably not because humans don't view grass as food.  It's testimony to the cleverness of man ancient humans who managed just 10,000 years ago to figure out a way to isolate the sea of each grass blade dry it pulverize it and grind it into a flower or use it to ferment things like beer and bread so this is a testimony to the cleverness of humans but it was a critical error to consume something that kept you alive another week 4 weeks or months but impaired long-term health and that's true for all Seas of grasses, including oats.

Treating Prostate Cancer into Extinction

First, I don't know how to cure cancer, prostate cancer or otherwise.  I'm not a doctor.  But over the years, I've read some things.  Like any battle, it requires multiple fronts of assault. 

Second, whatever treatment you do opt for make sure is does no harm, or if any, make sure it's minimal.  I am biased against chemotherapy.  I've known personally two young people with cancer who've died from taking chemo.  One, was a 20-year-old kid with testicular  cancer. How does a 20-year-old get testicular cancer?  Grandma cooking anything he wants?  Too many vaccines on the Childhood vaccine schedule?  

He had been overweight, but in the year prior to diagnosis he had developed a workout schedule and lost a lot of weight.  Family panicked, deferred to doctor, who recommended avant garde, Lance Armstrong treatment out at UCLA.  One year later, his skin turned yellow.  Chemo destroyed his immune system and infection took over.  6 months later, he was dead.  21 years old. 

The other person was a 45-year-old woman with Type II Diabetes who developed liver and colon cancer.  She'd already had one of her adrenal glands removed. Surgery may remove the cancerous tumor, but it doesn't remove the causes of the tumors or the cancer.  In fact, surgery can complicate, even exacerbate systems and cause a repopulation of tiny tumors which metastasizes.  Statistically, doing nothing gives you more life than many of the established treatment options.  She went on chemo.  It worked in the short term: it shrank tumors and eliminated some cancer cells until her body became resistant to the drug.  Her oncologist recommended that they try a new concoction of chemo.  But her body grew resistant to it.  Its effects made her weak, and she got nauseous regularly.  Like every chemo recipient, her cancer, too, became resistant to the drug.  Tumors stopped shrinking and tumor cells began to repopulate.  She was diagnosed with Stage IV liver cancer in December and died that following September.  

SUPPLEMENTS

Vitamin supplements are taken to support, enhance, or supplement your blood levels of different nutrients.  To get the stores of some vitamins into your blood, you need to take them for 2 to 3 weeks before they can register on a blood test.  Some supplements, depending on your condition, like a depleted condition of vitamins, can produce an immediate [1 to 3 to 7 days] reaction.  

VITAMIN D3/K2

Vitamin D3 (taken with K2 and magnesium) reduces colon cancer by at least 40%.  If you live above the 37th parallel, it's even more important that you supplement with D3 regularly.  

Your colon is not your prostate, but it is nearby.  Bill Sardi has a section on cancer.  In one article, he offers this regimen:

PROSTAGENIX

There is a prostate product, called Prostagenix, which has excellent ingredients, that was pitched by Larry King and Bill Sardi because of its Beta-Sitoserol, which apparently has more anti-inflammatory power than saw palmetto, the gold standard for a long time.  I've tried it and I like the results. It's designed to reduce inflammation, so that can't hurt, and improve the function of the prostate at the same time.  I definitely feel more energy.

IP6

The other product that I had phenomenal success with and continue to do so is IP6.  IP6, with its broad range of benefits, is made from rice bran.  It is probably the best over-the-counter anticancer compound on the market.  It is a mineral chelator.  It removes mostly the heavier minerals, like iron, calcium, and zinc, but it really removes all minerals.  Why do this?  Excess iron is implicated in cancer.  By the time we're 40s years old, iron begins to accumulate from the foods we've eaten by that time.  During our teens and 20s, we need to eat red meat and the iron in it to build muscle and bone.  Past our 20s, it begins to accumulate.  Once it accumulates and we have too much, our tissues can't absorb anymore and so the continued consumption of iron can float unbound in our blood.  In that unbound state, iron becomes an inflammatory protein that can cause all kinds of inflammatory, age-related conditions, like arthritis, gout, cancer, and others.  Some people take this periodically as a kind of maintenance of excess iron.  Iron is probably the only heavy mineral that is of concern, since other minerals, like magnesium, zinc, and copper are important for health maintenance.  Excess iron is cited as one reason why women tend to outlive men.  Women have a built-in mechanism to periodically shed iron.  Donating blood helps too.  But, IP6, at least from my experience, is fantastic.  In 2016, I was working a bulk route with FedEx.  But I'd been besieged by chronic injuries from sports and accidents.  I wrote Bill Sardi who recommended IP6.  Up to that point, I'd lumber out of bed, bracing myself against nearby furniture just to rise.  It wasn't pleasant.  I knew the benefits of chiropractic care; which allowed me to compete with and, on occasion, best the 20-year-olds on the court.  And no, they didn't just let me score!  LOL.  But I was in another territory or state at the time.  So I tried the IP6.  Took it at bedtime away from a meal, and when I woke up the following morning I literally sprung out of bed and felt like dancing.  At least those were my first thoughts.  An added benefit of IP6 is that it is a source of fiber.  And it helps with sleep.  Who'd a thunk it?  The wound-healing process can actually exacerbate an injury.  I played too many years of basketball and so was left with chronic knee and ankle pain and stiffness.  The way that the healing process can exacerbate an injury is that when blood flows to the injured site, it can deliver too much iron, and the iron will remain, leaving people with chronic injuries after the injury has healed.  What I noticed upon waking is that other, past and chronic injured areas felt lighter and more energetic.  I couldn't believe it.  And when I shared that with Sardi, that's when he explained that IP6 resolves a certain percentage of old injuries, because of the excess iron left over in those areas affected by an imperfect healing process.  So the metaphor that people can rust is more literal than we can imagine.  Phenomenal.  So I take IP6 regularly, more to manage the excess iron which is implicated in any cancer growth.  I'll be 66 in a few months, and I always have Harry Callahan reminding me that a man's got to know his limitations.  

This made an impression on me.  As did this from a gal with liver cancer.  

GLUTATHIONE

I like Glutathione over Beta-Glucans.  I've tried both.  For me and my biology, I get a nice effect with glutathione.  

GARLIC

I used to eat a whole garlic clove at night, and it would relax my muscles and stomach.  It has to be slightly crushed and then consumed.  But it has lots of anti-cancer and anti-microbial, even antiparasitic properties.  More evidence is emerging that cancer is the result of parasites.  Most think of cancer as something caused by viruses.  Viruses certainly can and do cause cancer.  

MELATONIN

I love melatonin.  Swanson's brand gives me really nice dreams, the kind where everything gets resolved without extended or intense conflict.  LOL.  One doctor, Dr. Houston, called it the best way to restore normal blood pressure.  And it certainly does that.  I used to wake at night with rising blood pressure.  I'd take melatonin and return to a wonderful sleep that kept me in a deep sleep until 6:30/7am.  It's also one of the BEST antioxidants for its broad range of areas in the body that respond to it. 

 

Bill Sardi writes, "Melatonin is the only agent that Dr. Houston has found to work to normalize blood pressure among patients whose blood pressure does not dip at night."  And if melatonin isn't the thing you like, Bill Sardi points out that zinc helps in this regard too. 

 

RESVERATROL

Resveratrol has powerful effects on cancer.  Resveratrol treats all 3 stages of cancer. Bill Sardi really was/is the Resveratrol guru. 

There are other approaches where you target the mitochondria of the cells.  One products that increases mitochondria strength and energy is PPQ.  I've tried it.  I like its effects.  

I am sure that there are other procedures.  One woman in California swears by ozone therapy.  

WHAT CAUSES CANCER?

Lots of things.  Stress is probably the most punishing because although you can endure physical stresses, there's always the psychological residue from that can inform decisions.  

It's been known that viruses can cause cancer. I learned this in 2017 from Bill Sardi.  

Parasites and fungus can also cause cancer.  And from what I understand, the older we get the more likely it is that parasites are the culprit.  But trying new medicine unknown by you or any of your acquaintances is fraught with fear and anxiety.  So even though we may not like our doctors, we tend to trust their expertise on drugs.  It makes sense.  To that end, learning that some antiparasitics act as some chemotherapies was interesting.

. . . the mechanism behind the anticancer action of Mebendazole, and found out that Mebendazole acts in a similar way as a group of chemotherapies such as Taxol. Yet, in contrast to chemotherapies, due to the way Mebendazole works, its toxicity is incomparably lower. Because of its good safety profile, the drug is an over the counter drug in most of the countries. 

I've not heard of Mebendezole but I have heard if Fenbendozale.  As a stand alone, it's not listed on Amazon but instead as Fenbendozale.  

I specifically like the anti-worms, anti-parasites, antibiotics, antiviral drugs, as a pattern start to emerge suggesting that the origin of cancer may be related to such a trigger (e.g. viruses, parasites, etc.) in much more cases than we currently are aware of. Multiple findings and observations, that I will discuss in a different post, indicate that such triggers may initiate cancer when they land in a “fertile ground”, represented by specific genetic weaknesses combined with a compromised immune system (due to e.g. stress, lifestyle, medication, etc.). This is why, I would seriously consider using anti-worms, anti-parasites, antibiotics, antiviral drugs as a part of more comprehensive treatment approaches that could also include conventional therapies. As long as the toxicity is low, it could make sense to cycle various drugs of this type.

Dr. Lee Merritt discusses the merits of parasitical cause for cancer.

SPIKE PROTEINS ARE INTRACELLULAR. ZINC GETS INTO THE CELL & STOPS PROTEIN REPLICATION

...that have excess iron and may carry zinc which then enters the iron rich cell and it stops protein replication in that cell. So helps cancer or some autoimmune conditions, inflammation, or various types of intracellular infections that antibodies don't do as much to fight.

— Jennifer Depew, RD (@deNutrients) January 8, 2022

Hide in the cells & make exosomes. Nasal rinses help keep it from getting farther into the body and into the intracellular stage.

More info in my document https://t.co/uPYqY3Zsg9

— Jennifer Depew, RD (@deNutrients) January 8, 2022

So could intracellular infection that spreads by direct cell to cell contact, or exosomes, instead of bursting cells open and releasing virus.

— Jennifer Depew, RD (@deNutrients) December 31, 2021

There Are Concerns that the Vaccines Can Cause Blindness. Take the necessary precaution with the right nutrients and supplements

BREAKING: COVID-19 Vaccine Can Cause Blindness

A group of scientists recently conducted a study that investigated a potential link between COVID-19 vaccines and a type of eye condition known as retinal vascular occlusion.

This condition occurs when blood vessels in the eye… pic.twitter.com/O1cWOMXrU6

— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) May 5, 2023

This is important to know with regard to the risks of blindness: 

The risk was found to be highest in the first few weeks after vaccination but could last for up to 12 weeks.

Furthermore, the incidence of retinal vascular occlusion was significantly higher in those who received the vaccine after 2 years, with an overall hazard ratio of 2.19. This means that vaccinated persons are 2 times more likely to be inflicted with blindness. 

Additionally, 12 weeks after being vaccinated, the potential for blindness was higher for all ages.

The research also revealed that individuals who had received the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines had a significantly increased risk of developing retinal vascular occlusion 2 years after vaccination.

It is important to note that the risk of blindness caused by the vaccine did not vary based on the brand or dose of the vaccine. This means that all COVID-19 vaccines were associated with this side effect.

Here is where it gets insane: 

Despite the risks, the paper still recommends people to be vaccinated, referencing the 14.4 million excess deaths prevented by the vaccine and "the lack of definite causation between retinal vascular occlusion and vaccinations." 

https://hbnshow.com/new-research-shows-a-way-to-preserve-your-precious-eyesight/

This caught my eye.  Looks like Longevinex halts macular degeneration 4 years in advance before it occurs. 

We also discussed zinc as prevention for the 3 major causes of death. Molecular Multi contains an excellent form of zinc in the effective dose not found in other multis. *The form of Vitamin B6 that he mentioned as being in his multi is Pyridoxal-5-Phoshate.

TOXINS IN WATER SUPPLIES ARE ASSESSED INDIVIDUALLY, NOT IN TOTAL AND NOT OVER A LIFETIME

A friend of mine loves to complain about how the free market allows bad players and profit-seeking outfits to do whatever they please with regard to their product or service and hide much of the truth about these through clever advertisement or outright omission.  This is a fact of life, and one reason why online journalists are a source of valuable facts and information.  I try.  But the free market also makes us smarter.  We learn pretty quick what is good, bad, and absolutely ugly.  And once we know, we can abstain from a product or a service or even a person.  This is the virtue of a free market--it makes consumers smarter.  

Take water, for example.  We drink bottled water to avoid excess copper or rust or chlorine.  Or so we think.  Until we learn that municipal water supplies in one city are bottled and shipped for sale in other cities without batting an eye at the contaminants in the water.  People learn.  We adjust.  Sometimes too late, after we get sick, not Montezuma's Revenge sick, but a low-grade health sick, like fatigue.  And only to find out later that some other chemical has found its nefarious way into our water supply.  Find ways of shortening that learning curve.  But we need water as toxic as it might be.  There are remedies, however, that I point to below, ones that comes from the premiere nutritional compound guy, Bill Sardi.  But first, this report by Matt Agorist from Natural Blaze.  

We've known about the deliberate and legal poisoning of the water supply by cities and counties with flouride, but radioactive isotopes?  That's new.  Government agencies cooking the books?  That's not new.  But it seems that all reports about heavy chemicals in the water are problematic since the reports tend to focus on a single chemical and fail to look at the accumulative effect from decades of a combination of metals.  However, this fact is not overlooked by Bill Sardi.

ACCUMULATED/COMBINED HAZARD OVER TIME  

However, one of the problems with assessment of toxins in drinking water supplies is that they are considered individually, not in total, and not over a lifetime.

Metallic mineral accumulation can produce adverse effects in biology.  For example, the accumulation of chromium VI in plants has been shown to inhibit the production of chlorophyll. [Chemosphere Oct 2000] 

The accumulated heavy metals burden (chromium, cadmium, lead and arsenic) in drinking water in Bangladesh exceeds safe limits. [Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management May 2016]  One study in Pakistan reveals chromium VI sample of 1.313 milligrams per liter of water but total of all minerals tested (cadmium, lead, nickel, zinc, iron, copper and chromium VI) amounted to 4.214 milligrams per liter. [Journal Pharmaceutical Sciences & Research 2015] 

Some heavy metals can be stored in organs like the liver and brain where they accumulate and wreak havoc later in life.  Chromium VI accumulates in all organs in laboratory mice. [Toxicological Profile for Chromium] 

The combined accumulation of heavy metals (antimony, arsenic, bismuth, cadmium, cerium, chromium, cobalt, copper, gallium, gold, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nickel, platinum, silver, tellurium, thallium, tin, uranium, vanadium, and zinc, 23 total) in the human body over time is a cause for concern.  [Interdisciplinary Toxicology June 2014; International Journal Physical Sciences 2007]

Fish consumption is the greatest contributor to total heavy metal accumulation in the human body.  [International Research Journal Public Environmental Health July 2014]

Most heavy metals accumulate in the liver, kidney and gills of fish where they can cause functional disturbances. [Soil & Water Pollution Monitoring 2006]  

In fact, the gradual lifetime accumulation of metallic minerals after full growth is achieved in males and with the cessation of menstruation in females is postulated the chief accelerator of aging itself. [Knowledge of Health; Longevinex.com; Resveratrol News]  

Bottom line, the potential health hazard posed by chromium VI in drinking water is overstated.  The total accumulated metallic mineral load over a lifetime needs to be considered in the maintenance of human health.  It is best for adults to include mineral controlling molecules in their diets and food supplements to slow or reverse aging.  Some food supplements provide an array of these metal chelators. [Longevinex]

It is funny how most of us believe that much of what we take to be the free market in groceries and food is literally killing us, and government is the faithful handmaiden in seeing this result brought to its fruition.  

By Matt Agorist from the Natural Blaze.  

h/t Lew Rockwell

Matt Agorist alerts us to a damning report that effects 170 million Americans.

A damning report from the Environmental Working Group has just revealed that drinking water for more than 170 million Americans in all 50 states contains radioactive elements that are shown to cause cancer. Not only does the report expose the deadly levels of radiation but it also shows that officials have been actively covering it up.

The investigations looked at tests from 22,000 utilities in all 50 states between 2010 to 2015.  He points out that only a small percentage of water supplies exceeded toxic levels, but that their standards or legal radiation limits are "more than 40 years old."  So, what, he's calling for government upgrades?  Good luck.  The tests, however, when measurd by the more stringent standards set in Caliornia back in 2006 that "nearly 100 percent of tested water supplies failed," making places like "Flint, Michigan look like child’s play."  

Omitting what the percentage is, Matt Agorist acknowledges that “Most radioactive elements in tap water come from natural sources, but that doesn’t take away the need to protect people through stronger standards and better water treatment,” said Olga Naidenko, Ph.D., EWG’s senior science advisor for children’s environmental health."  I am not saying that this is not serious, but maybe there are bigger fish to fry, particularly when I read in the very next paragraph that "The problem is only getting worse, too."  How can it get worse than radiation?  When it comes to political appointees, which regrettably is what his article to turns to.  Politics, which is so fashionable these days, effectively discredits his message.  

EWG reports, the government has long kown about this problem and has covered it up by fudging the numbers. Now, one of the people who admitted to fudging the numbers has just been nominated to head the White House Council on Environmental Quality, or CEQ. 

The nominee, Kathleen Hartnett White, admitted in a 2011 investigation by Houston’s KHOU-TV that if utility tests found radiation levels over the EPA limit, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality would subtract the test’s margin of error to make it appear the water met federal standards. In some cases, this meant that Texans whose tap water posed the extraordinarily elevated lifetime cancer risk of 1 in 400 were not informed of the danger.

So, what, Argonist's article is about government incompetence?  Okay, then what is the solution?  You got it: a different government appointment. 

AGORIST CHASES POLITICS; DROPS HEALTH CONCERNS              Matt Agorist's concern is less about radiation or water contaminants than it is about partisan appointees.  And that all we need to do is rely on a more effective federal government agent, and certainly not one who seems to have political connections, to fix the problem for us 170 million Americans.  But has government ever been a solution to any of our problems?  There was Erin Brokovich who found poisonous contaminants in Hinkley, California's water supply.  There is the ongoing, rarely-to-be-challenged fluoride medicated water in municipal supplies across the country.  There is an issue with lead, with Chromium VI, and others.  Perhaps if we were to grade government protection or monitoring of our water supply, it would earn an epic fail.  But which chemical is the most toxic and the one we should look to avoid against all others?  Chlorine, according to Bill Sardi.  

Is tap water safe to drink?  Well, yes, kinda.  Tap water has measured levels of arsenic, lead, mercury, nickel, other heavy metals, pharmaceutical drugs, and other industrial chemicals including perchlorate (rocket fuel). In fact, analysis of 59 small streams in the U.S. found the anti-diabetic drug metformin in almost all of them even though only trace amounts were found. [Daily Mail UK Oct 3, 2016]

One of the most toxic chemicals known, chlorine, is added to water to kill off pathogenic bacteria, fungi and amoeba.  Without chlorinated water, diseases like dysentery, cholera and typhoid ran rampant in populations.  Water chlorination is one of the great advances in public hygiene.  However, chlorinated water does increase the lifetime risk of developing bladder and rectal cancer, where it pools into greater concentrations. [Scientific American]

And there is this, "Long-term exposure to chlorinated drinking water (30-40 years) increases the risk of colon cancer."

Water is important, no doubt.  In fact, when it comes to colon cancer, water is decisive in fending off that disease.  

Drinking water reduces the risk of colon cancer in men. Men who consume the most water have a 92% lower risk of rectal cancer compared to men who drink less water.

Drink water, but avoid chlorine, long-term consumption of chlorine.  As to Chromium VI and chlorine, there are nutritional remedies--vitamin C, N-acetyl cysteine, reserveratrol, and garlic.  Include these in your diet.  

The major dietary antioxidant that counters chromium VI toxicity is vitamin C.  Vitamin C reduces 90% of the oxidative threat posed by chromium VI.  [Carcinogenesis 1992]  The published reports validating the effectiveness of vitamin C in reduction of abolishment of DNA damage caused by chromium VI is abundant. [Environmental Health PerspectivesSept 1994; Journal Applied Toxicology Nov 2005;Molecular Medicine Reports July 2013]

N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), available as a dietary supplement, is well established as an antidote to chromium VI poisoning. [Journal Pharmaceutical Biomedical Analysis Jan 2016; PLoS One Sept 2014; Free Radical Medicine Biology Dec 2013]

The red wine molecule resveratrol is also cited as a molecule that protects against chromium VI toxicity by activation of internal enzymatic antioxidants in the body (glutathione, catalase, superoxide dismutase). [Toxicology Applied Pharmacology 2016]

Garlic ingestion is an well-documented approach to negating the toxic effects of chromium VI. [Journal Basic Clinical Physiology & Pharmacology 2009; Journal Applied Toxicology Oct 2008]  The key molecule in garlic is allicin [International Journal Environmental Research Public Health Sept 2008], which is easily destroyed by stomach acid unless a garlic clove is crushed prior to ingestion allowing an enzyme (alliinase) to yield allicin, or by consumption of a unique alkalinized garlic pill that assuredly produces allicin. [Garlinex]

AUTOPSIES: VIRUSES ARE INTRACELLULAR. Zinc Ionosopheres [like Quercetin] Help Identify Cells with Present Pathogen

Related
intracellular pathogens tend to flare up, then go into remission, repeat.
Detox strategies are a need
& zinc ionophores help identify the cells with pathogen present.

Helps in autoimmune conditions likely due to unidentified intracellular inv.
https://t.co/Ob86GefHhz

— Jennifer Depew, RD (@deNutrients) December 25, 2021

Penis Injury from the Shot?

Penis Injury from the Shot: "It's Very Disturbing"

Potential Side Effects:

• Penile vein thrombosis (blood clot) - Mondor's disease

• Penile neoplasm (malignant lesion)

• Penile squamous cell carcinoma (cancer) - If it goes undetected, it can spread to the lymph system and… https://t.co/cYzS9NsS2w pic.twitter.com/yqLlDa79W7

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) March 1, 2023

She talks mainly of the penis but if the prostate is affected then Prostagenix could be beneficial.  Here is a review of Prostagenix.  Men need zinc, we need more zinc than women do.  So supplementation should be considered.

CORONAVIRUS VS SARS/MERS/EBOLA/SWINE FLU

Thanks to Robert Wenzel, who writes

The coronavirus, now known as COVID-19, originated in Wuhan, China, and has spread to at least 26 other countries.

Here is some sound background information on the virus from Syra Madad, the senior director of the NYC Health + Hospitals System-wide Special Pathogens Program, and Stephen Morse, a professor of epidemiology at Columbia University, debunked 13 of the most common myths about the coronavirus. 

I would want to know who is generating these myths?  Bat soup?  I mean this is the stuff of legends, of Vlad the Impaler.  Like most viruses, they are spread through human contact, which means that people have to touch another person and that contact usually involves some fluid, like saliva from someone sneezing or coughing.  And if you're of a certain age, I mean 35 and younger and in good physical health, odds are that that contact won't even make you sick.  But if you're older and susceptible to illness and have a lowered or compromised immunity, then, yes, you'd want to take precautions.  But a mask is not a great precaution as the two reviewed in the video.  And the Corona-virus does not have the deaths associated with it like SARS did or does.  In fact, if you're looking for deaths or body count as a marker for a serious condition, look no further than hospital beds where Sepsis is responsible for 50% of all hospitable deaths.  So unless you've got sepsis, odds are you're probably going to survive this purported pandemic as well.  Darn it.  Does that mean you have to go to work?  Does that mean that you have to continue making money, continue looking after and enduring family problems?  You bet it does.    

Compare the Corona Virus against other viruses: 

Coronavirus vs SARS/MERS/Ebola/Swine Flu 😬 pic.twitter.com/iRmeV0kWoI

— Dave Jones 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🏳️‍🌈 (@WelshGasDoc) February 25, 2020

Still freaked out?  Then take some daily vitamin C, vitamin D, and Zinc Citrate.  Bill Sardi points out how indispensable zinc is for healthy immunity.

"Along with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, Rodgers was treated for COVID-19 with monoclonal antibodies, zinc, and vitamins C and D."

Not completely sure how the marketing of Ivermectin works against the vaccine campaign, but clearly if Ivermectin's reputation survives as a cure for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and or COVID, wouldn't that throw into question the origin story of SARS-CoV-2 or COVID from being a virus that originated in some exotic wet market out of China to that of a parasitic worm contracted from some unclean source?  If Ivermectin is a horse dewormer or a dewormer of any kind and it works to cure COVID 100%, wouldn't that make the cause of COVID not a virus but a parasite?  When they claim dewormer, they're conceding that the cause of COVID is a parasitic worm. 

The tweet below comes from World Net Daily covering Aaron Rodgers's recent interview with Pat McAfee.  Author Art Moore explains that 

Along with Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, Rodgers was treated for COVID-19 with monoclonal antibodies, zinc, and vitamins C and D. The Packers star told McAfee the treatment was recommended by podcaster and friend Joe Rogan, who recovered quickly from his own bout with COVID-19.

"I'm not some uneducated person who's throwing stuff out there," Rodgers said. "If you want to rip on me because I took horse dewormer, and whatever else you want to talk about, that's fine. But I also got better in 48 hours. And I had symptoms." 

Back in October 2021, Dr. Judy Mikovits called the vaccines a synthetic virus. More recently, we've learned that it is a synthesis if virus and parasite.  What an awful combination.  

.My house's dewormer? Yep....that and Hydroxychloriquine (fish tank cleaner) But WAIT.....Who recommended people swallow flashlights & ingest bleach; THEN start a program and dubbed it "Operation Warp Speed"? Hint: NOT DR. FAUCI. pic.twitter.com/GmT13H6hym

— Doxiemama16 🇺🇸🇮🇹🇬🇧 🏴‍☠️ (@taraclocastro) December 6, 2021

BENEFITS OF BEETS

I enjoyed a fresh beet root today and boy could I feel the burning of detoxification.  I combined the beet with half a sliced Granny Smith apple and the taste and nutrient combination were fantastic.  This article from BodyMindDetox  corroborates the detoxifying benefits of my experience, except that it recommends adding a lot more healthy ingredients.  It recommends mixing "cucumber, celery, lemon, apple or ginger" to get added and necessary zinc:

Fresh Beetroot is a powerful food for cleansing and supporting liver function.  Try starting the day with at least 8 ounces of Beet juice mixed with cucumber, celery, lemon, apple or ginger for an extra helping of zinc.  

The liver's ability to function efficiently is crucial as it is accountable for filtering at least 3 pints of blood every minute of the day and is responsible for the largest percentage of detoxification, when the organ gets bogged down, sluggish or clogged the entire body becomes more contaminated and toxic.

Need more proof on the benefits of beets?  You shouldn't miss this.