LORI SIMPSON: I won't even allow them to put in an IV because that's how they gave him all of the drugs that he did not consent to

The woman's name is Lori Simpson.  Her husband's name is John. 

"John was told by the nurses to defecate in the bed...He was double restrained...they took away all his dignity..."

"I had $1.8 million paid to [the hospital]. I think because he didn't die, they were out of bonuses, and so that's why they eventually discharged him."

In this… pic.twitter.com/9I6POZhkoJ

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) June 2, 2024

I was training the 1980s when they're were standards John was told by the nurses to defecate in the bed.  I was just horrified.  He was double restrained.  He had chemical restraints and physical restraints, and I was certainly taught that that was illegal.  That's not something you can do.  They took away all his dignity.  They just destroyed him as a man.  I said to him if I ever need to go to the hospital for a trauma or whatever, that would be the only reason I would go,  these are the things I won't accept.  I won't even allow them to put in an IV because that's how they gave him all of the drugs that he did not consent to.  They would just come in and say hey this is for this or that and push it through the IV.  So we are very careful, and there is no way that we would go back if we could avoid it.

So what do you think about all of this what was going on because it's not just your husband.  Absolute countless people having the same story but hardly any making it back home and it's still going on today.

It is still going on.  For us, it was pure evil for pure profit.  We had really good insurance because it was my insurance through Healthcare and they probably . . . from what I can see so far I had $1.8 million paid to them for John, and I think because he didn't die they were out of bonuses and so that's why they eventually discharged him.  And when they discharged him, his CO2 was high.  He had pneumonia on discharge.  He was so weak he couldn't even pick up his foot if a sheet was on it, and certainly he couldn't walk.  He was fully dependent on discharge.

And he had to go back into the hospital you said so what we're not 

He did.  He was discharged with pneumonia, so his stats were very low and I had to call the ambulance again.  I thought I was having an equipment failure.  He was on trach collar oxygen and nasal cannula oxygen, and I thought the trach that the concentrator had broken.  But actually it was him, and he was diagnosed with a hospital actually Hospital acquired pneumonia.  He went to a different hospital.  But I had sent him to an urgent care near us, and they wouldn't come out and talk to me because they were reading the notes from the first hospital that was talking about how violent I was.  I was always respectful, didn't even talk to the nurses.  Never got calls from doctors unless they wanted to do something to him, and then it was always a threat: do this or make him a DNR, a Do Not Resuscitate.  He had multiple pneumo thoraxes.  We took him to the you the ER to put one chest tube in the middle of the night.  He had pneumonia 2 days later.  The ER is a very dirty place in a hospital.  It's not where you should do that type of procedure.

Make sure you have an advocate.  Make sure you have advanced directives.  Make sure everything is spelled out.  I think that John did not get Remdesivir only because we had everything in writing.  When I looked at his lab values and everything else they did to him to orchestrate to getting him on the vents, he shouldn't be here but he is.  

COLBERT: Did Ivermectin do anything [for your bottom line]? FAUCI: No.

DR. FAUCI: Ivermectin "does not help with COVID and it could be dangerous." pic.twitter.com/mYEkoesgdz

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) October 6, 2022

To say that Dr. Anthony Fauci is a liar falls flat because the extent of his lies, the millions of people he's responsible for murdering and maiming, is beyond the pale.  

Dr. Pierre Kory says that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine were the two saving agents early on that could have helped both the COVID sufferers and those suffering from the crippling side effects of the vaccines.  Yet, here he is saying that these two drugs don't work, and that the only drug that should be given is Remdesivir, a drug he conducted trials on and that killed 50% of its participants and for which he has a vested, meaning profitable, interest in.    

ATTY TOM RENZ: Dr Mercola just put out a paper where he discussed ventilators. That concept for ventilators came from China

#3 - “No one told the patients, hey, you’re going to be put on this vent. It’s probably going to kill you, but it may protect the healthcare workers,” testified attorney @RenzTom to the Pennsylvania State Senate earlier this year. “No one told the families that.” pic.twitter.com/Tk8t1f7iY1

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) November 1, 2023

And she has audio recordings of a conversation between her and a nurse I recently publicized.  The nurse is talking about how they're killing people in the hospital, how their floor was doing the things that no other floor would do because, well, no other floor wanted to carry out the murder essentially.  They knew what was happening in a lot of cases.  Dr. Mercola just put out a paper where he discussed ventilators.  Ventilators, that concept for ventilators came from China.  If you put a ventilator on someone's face, they can't cough on you, so we'll keep the healthcare worker safe, right?

Even though that we knew that 75% or so of the people in New York City put on ventilators were dying, we kept doing it to protect the healthcare workers.  That was the theory.  Now no one talked about that when the patients were going in there.  there.  No one told the patients, "Hey, you're being protected . . .  you're going to be put on this.  this.   It's probably going to kill you, but it may protect the healthcare workers.  No one told the families that.  And by the way, we actually had whistleblower testimony from a yet-to-be unmasked whistleblower, and probably won't be, who worked from CMS.  I've got data from CMS that showed in a number of Texas hospitals that as high as 90% of patients put on the vent died.  90%.  Now they wouldn't let you try Ivermectin but they were more than willing to put you on the vent where you had a 90% fatality rate you're telling me that they didn't notice the you're telling me that the doctors on those floors I mean listen you know I can't say all doctors are created equal McCullough is ahead above most.  But if you got through med school,  you could probably . . . I would think you would probably be smart enough to notice that when 9 out of 10 of your patients and when they're put on the vent die, at least maybe you should ask the question, Is there a better way?  Why not let someone try Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine if you have a 9 out of 10 chance of dying anyways?

The reason that that's dear to my heart is because the people called me and I fought with hospital after hospital after hospital to try and save their lives.  And as I testified last year here, we essentially legislated these deaths into being by incentivizing the use of Remdesivir in protocols incentivizing the use of ventilators, and incentivizing, again not people recovering from COVID but people dying from COVID.  You got a cash bonus when someone died from COVID.  So it was and incentive to kill people and it worked incredibly well.  I'm happy to revisit that but again my testimony from last year covered that.  

Babies born to vaccinated mothers were born with no ears at Clovis Community

They Killed My Best Friend https://t.co/K103SUf9UP

— Children’s Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) March 25, 2024

Clovis Community Hospital is located northeast of Fresno.  The nurse here explains how the hospital, by giving her friend Remdesivir instead of life-saving Ivermectin or Hydroxy-chloroquine, killed her friend, Lupe.  She also learned that babies being born to vaccinated mothers were being born with no ears.

HOW AND WHEN THE U.S. SURRENDERED SOVEREIGNTY

Bipartisan Presidential Executive Orders in 2003, 2005, and 2014 authorized the Secretary of Health and Human Services to detain Americans on suspicion of having colds and flus.

Third installment of the Callender Interview series.

Jan. 31, 2022 - Attorney Todd Callender explains the legal framework for suspension of human rights and civil liberties globally. Set in motion by the Bank of International Settlements in 1990, ratified by national governments in 2005, and implemented in 2020 with a “WHO-declared pandemic.”

Feb. 2, 2022 - January 19, 2017 Federal Register. US Health and Human Services final rulemaking, WHO International Health Regulations, and human liberty. 

OBSERVATION:

The governments of nation-states around the world can’t stop the mass murder and mass maiming of the world’s people through forced detentions (in homes, nursing homes, schools, hospitals, and quarantine facilities); forced masking and social distancing; forced withholding of preventative and early treatments for Covid-19; forced administration of ventilation, Remdesivir, midazolam and other lethal poisons; and forced administration of mRNA and DNA bioweapon injections, until those governments and their central banks (the Federal Reserve in the United States) are prepared to forego access to the international financial system controlled by the individuals who control the Bank for International Settlements.

One step would be the signing of a Presidential Executive Order revoking Executive Order 13295 of April 4, 2003; Executive Order 13375 of April 1, 2005, and Executive Order 13674 of July 31, 2014, and reinstating Executive Order 12452 of Dec. 22, 1983.

2005 - World Health Organization creates International Health Regulations, IHR

In 2005, through the World Health Organization, the individuals who control the Bank of International Settlements created the International Health Regulations (IHR).

The second edition of the IHR is described, by WHO, as follows: 

"In response to the exponential increase in international travel and trade and emergence and reemergence of international disease threats and other health risks, 196 countries across the globe have agreed to implement the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR). This binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007.”

The stated purpose and scope of the IHR are "to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade."

The IHR "are not limited to specific diseases, but are applicable to health risks, irrespective of their origin or source." 

The IHR further, "requires States to strengthen core surveillance and response capacities at the primary, intermediate and national level, as well as at designated international ports, airports and ground crossings. They further introduce a series of health documents, including ship sanitation certificates and an international certificate of vaccination or prophylaxis for travelers."

The 2005 International Health Regulations required each signatory nation to adopt implementing legislation, which the United States government did, through [among many other acts] revisions to 42 Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 70 and 71.

Those federal laws regulate interstate and foreign quarantine activities during "public health emergencies of international concern."

2017 - Major rulemaking by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

The most recent, major revisions of 42 CFR Parts 70 and 71 occurred through a "final rulemaking" by the Department of Health and Human Services, published in the Federal Register on Jan. 19, 2017, and effective Feb. 17, 2017. (See 6890 Federal Register. Vol. 82, No. 12)

The Federal Register entry reported that some commenters, during the public comment period, requested clarification concerning whether the World Health Organization’s (WHO) declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) could continue to serve as the basis for a ‘‘public health emergency’’ if the President or HHS Secretary disagreed with the declaration of a PHEIC on legal, epidemiologic, or policy grounds.

Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control respondents described such a scenario as “unlikely” and noted that “CDC remains a component of HHS, subject to the authority and supervision of the HHS Secretary and President of the United States.”

Another comment addressed the same concern from a slightly different perspective: the commenter “objected to referencing the WHO’s declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in the definition of ‘‘public health emergency’’ because this ostensibly relinquishes U.S. sovereignty.”

Again, HHS/CDC respondents said they “disagreed” with the characterization, stating that US government officials would "give consideration to the WHO’s declaration of a PHEIC" but would “continue to make its own independent decisions regarding when a quarantinable communicable disease may be likely to cause a public health emergency if transmitted to other individuals.”

A few paragraphs later, the HHS/CDC respondents again said that “it would be unlikely for the United States to formally object to the WHO’s declaration of a PHEIC, but that CDC remains a component of HHS, subject to the authority and supervision of the HHS Secretary and President of the United States.”

It’s very careful sophistry. HHS states that the US government is unlikely to even try to resist a WHO declaration, not addressing what would happen in the unlikely event of such an attempt. Presumably because it would be financially impossible for the US government to make the attempt because the Federal Reserve would immediately lose access to the Bank of International Settlements.

Other commenters expressed concern that "any disease considered to be a public health emergency may qualify it as quarantinable" and noted that some PHEICs ‘‘most certainly do not qualify as public health emergencies’’ under the proposed definition.

HHS/CDC respondents “clarified” that “only those communicable diseases listed by Executive Order of the President may qualify as quarantinable communicable diseases. For example, Zika virus infection, which although the current epidemic was declared a PHEIC by WHO, is not a quarantinable communicable disease.”

After dispatching with the comments, the HHS/CDC respondents concluded:  “The definition of Public health emergency is finalized as proposed.”

US Presidents’ Executive Orders since 1990

As it happens, there have been three Executive Orders issued by US Presidents related to the quarantine power of the Secretary of Health and Human Services laws since 1990.

They were promulgated under section 361(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264(b)), and they assigned the President's executive authority to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for implementation.

Executive Order 13295

On April 4, 2003, President George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13295, listing: 

“(a) Cholera; Diphtheria; infectious Tuberculosis; Plague; Smallpox; Yellow Fever; and Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (Lassa, Marburg, Ebola, Crimean-Congo, South American, and others not yet isolated or named) and

(b) Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), which is a disease associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, is transmitted from person to person predominantly by the aerosolized or droplet route, and, if spread in the population, would have severe public health consequences.” 

See Federal Register/Vol. 68, No. 68, p. 17255

The 2003 Executive Order revoked Executive Order 12452 of Dec. 22, 1983, which specified quarantinable diseases as including "Cholera or suspected Cholera, Diphtheria, infectious Tuberculosis, Plague, suspected Smallpox, Yellow Fever, and suspected Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (Lassa, Marburg, Ebola, Congo-Crimean, and others not yet isolated or named).”

In other words, in 2003, President Bush added the common cold to the list of communicable diseases empowering the executive branch, through the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to summarily detain American citizens and prevent them from traveling across state or federal borders.

Executive Order 13375 of April 1, 2005

On April 1, 2005, President Bush signed Executive Order 13375, extending the quarantine power of the Health and Human Services Secretary to include:

“(c) Influenza caused by novel or reemergent influenza viruses that are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic.’’ 

(See Federal Register, Vol. 70, No. 64, p. 17299)

In 2005, the executive branch of the federal government granted itself the power to detain American citizens for the flu.

Executive Order 13674 of July 31, 2014

On July 31, 2014, President Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13674, revising Section b of President Bush's 2003 order. The new text expanded on the definition of SARS [the common cold]:

“(b) Severe acute respiratory syndromes, which are diseases that are associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, are capable of being transmitted from person to person, and that either are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic, or, upon infection, are highly likely to cause mortality or serious morbidity if not properly controlled. This subsection does not apply to influenza.’’ 

See Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 151, p. 45671

Parsed, in 2014, the federal government expanded its power to detain American citizens for common colds, not only if the diseases are "transmitted" but if they are "capable of being transmitted . . . and are causing, or have the potential to cause a pandemic."

That's what made it legally possible for President Trump and President Biden, working through the Centers for Disease Control, to 

1.  place all Americans — including healthy Americans with no symptoms — under house/business/school arrest; 

2.  order that healthy Americans wear medical devices (cloth masks) without individual clinical diagnoses, without evidence of efficacy for infection control, and without a personal physician's prescription; and submit to forcible injection of mRNA and DNA toxins.

Combined effect of International Health Regulations and implementing national regulations and executive orders

Explaining the combined effect in the podcast interview, Attorney Todd Callender stated:

“It allows for, in every instance, a suspension of your human rights, your sovereign rights, your Constitutional rights, charter rights."

Iain Davis, author of Pseudopandemic: New Normal Technocracy, 2021, writing at The Disillusioned Blogger. 

LATYPOVA: . . . for practical purposes, homocide, as long as it's committed by the vaccine approved by CDC, is legal.

the laws have been amended and new ones have been introduced such that we have this now what she characterizes as the perfect legal cage in which nobody needs to be in on anything and no real corruption is really necessary.  --Sasha Latypova

Laws have been subverted, criminality has been legalised
Check out my latest podcast with @sasha_latypova pic.twitter.com/FB4EZ0d8Zy

— Dr Ahmad Malik (@DocAhmadMalik) March 20, 2024

So the laws have been amended and new ones have been introduced such that we have this now what she characterizes as the perfect legal cage in which nobody needs to be in on anything and no real corruption is really necessary.  Because for practical purposes, homocide, as long as it's committed by the vaccine approved by CDC, is legal.  That's the net effect of these laws.  So the combination of public health emergency declaration, and use of EUA countermeasures, which only exist under active public health emergency declaration, which is the PREP Act Declaration, issued by HHS Secretary.  So as long as they use those, they can kill and injure as many people as they want.  And they can never be prosecuted because they've been given almost blanket liability protection with this PREP Act with the exception of willful misconduct.  And the way that willful misconduct is defined in their legal opinion letters published on their website.  It says that as long as you follow our orders, it's not willful misconduct.  In fact, they are prosecuting people for not following HHS orders, for not using Remdesivir that shuts down kidneys and kills people, for not using ventilators, for not doing all those atrocities.  If they refuse, they get prosecuted.  But if they don't refuse it and follow the orders, it's not willful misconduct and you can't really prosecute . . . .

Dr. T is one of the so-called “disinformation dozen“ across US mainstream media and in every language as they targeted the 12 of us including Bobby Kennedy, Dr. Mercola, yours truly, because we reached more people than anyone with the Truth. pic.twitter.com/2yVzQ97Wbt

— Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News 🙌 (@unhealthytruth) June 20, 2023

And how is it killing the immune system this is really important the Pfizer shot because of the way they created it synthetically allows the messenger RNA to pass inside your cells and be replicated indefinitely by the ribosomes.  So you cannot get it out of your body.  So there's no detoxing from it.  Now can you detox your body and make yourself overall healthier? Yes. Are you going to eliminate the spike protein or the antibodies of the spike protein or the stupid monoclonal antibodies that they're advocating?  No.  Because you sensitize your dendritic cells and your B cells so spikes are going to be there probably forever the messenger RNA oblates, wipes out, destroys toll-like receptors 3, 7, and 8.  Toll-like receptors are like little radars that are constantly vigilantly looking around and getting rid of viruses and bacteria and things that don't belong there.  They are our innate God-given, what we're born with, immune system.  The messenger RNA shots destroy toll-like receptors 3, 7, and 8 which is our first line of primary defense, making us more susceptible to getting Covid.  And this is why all the people who get the shots suddenly are sick because they're more susceptible.  We know the mechanisms.  Doctors are illiterate and not reading it.  We know that people getting the shots are more likely to get sick and more likely to get hospitalized.  And if they're in the hospital and they get Remdesivir and they're put on a ventilator, that's a greater than 80% mortality rate.  We know the mechanism: the Spike protein enters the nucleus of our cells and binds to our DNA, so anybody who says it doesn't irreversibly bind to your DNA,  they're wrong.  They are not reading the scientific literature.  And when it binds to the DNA, it blocks the door and starts making it into an abnormal cell that if that cell replicates it'll turn into cancer.  And then it bars the door, it blocks the door, and doesn't allow our God-given immune system repair enzymes to come and repair the damage the spike protein has caused.  Hence, that allows cancer to form and . . . why we are seeing . . . and Dr. Ryan Cole has talked about this a lot . . . why are we seeing this explosion of cancers in people that get these shots.  People that have been in remission have been treated have been in remission and said they don't have cancer anymore suddenly they are exploding with endometrial cancer, all kinds of blood cancers, lymphatic cancers, breast cancer from the shots and we know the mechanism.  It's not a guess.  New data came out in the last two weeks that if a person is injected, they are 8.12 times more likely to be infected with Omicron. Again, suppression of your immune system, suppression of your white blood cells, oblation of your toll-like receptors the more shots you get the more you destroy your immune system in the faster that happens

Podcast Discussion with Bruce de Torres on TNT Radio, by @sasha_latypova https://t.co/2It7Joi3VN

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) November 30, 2023

The video includes a transcript. 

0:18

This is WorldStage, exposing the tyrannies and exploring our power with deep dives into history, current events, dangerous trends, and the nature of reality.

0:30

Before I introduce my guest, I want to talk for just a moment about

0:34

A post at conservativewoman.co.uk from November 15th titled Pilot warns of airline industry disaster due to COVID vaccines.

0:47

Captain Shane Murdoch says the air industry is quote poised on the precipice of disaster close quote.

0:55

A pilot for more than 40 years and a qualified air accident investigator

1:00

He has found official data that backs up his claim of impending global catastrophe.

1:04

He adds, quote, when correlated, the data indicate there is an enormous problem that is having and will have a significant impact on aviation safety worldwide.

1:16

There is enough evidence to be sending out red flags.

1:20

It's a great piece at conservativewoman.co.uk.

1:26

From November 15th, Pilot warns.

1:29

of Airline Industry Disaster Due to COVID Vaccines.

1:34

With me this hour is Sasha Latypova whose on her substack writes, I could not become a professional artist, so I became a pharma and medical device R&D executive.

1:50

Her substack is titled Due Diligence and Art, "Uncovering Fraud in Pharmaceutical R & D and Manufacturer."

2:00

And by popular demand, I will include my art pieces that have nothing to do with pharma.

2:05

SashaLatypova.substack.com.

2:43

The Big Plan and Intention from the Outset.

2:47

Is that a good summary?

2:50

Yes, correctly.  The problem is that, well, it was interesting that in your previous segment, Angelina Jolie was quoted using the word kill box because it is a military term, and my colleague Katherine Watt and I, in our investigation, called the system of law and regulations that was put in place before the so-called COVID pandemic a kill box, and it's a global kill box.

3:23

So it's the same concept of deploying the military onto the global population to cause harm, destruction, killing, maiming, and it's indiscriminate.

3:35

There is no racial preference here or any sort of preference.

3:38

It's basically designed to destroy the world as we know it, destroy our constitutional governance, and nation-states, reduce the economic prosperity of the people, kill as many people as possible, and enslave the rest.

3:59

And so we're living through this, through this scenario unfolding and the hot kinetic war and that that has been also raging in Ukraine and now in the Middle East.  That's also part of the same plan.

4:22

I've heard folks whom I respect for their research and analysis say that the Chinese created, I think particularly the Pfizer shot, maybe others, and they're not aware that there's the same injury and death in China.

4:41

Are you aware of any distinction that China's kind of been protected from the harm of these shots?

4:48

No, I personally do not believe that China created these vaccines and China created this virus.  And China is attacking us.  That's not true.  The US government created these shots.

5:02

And US government created whatever they sprayed around and deployed as an initial to generate initial symptoms of COVID, which wasn't dangerous.  It was just to scare people and to initiate this whole global panic.  But it's not a Chinese plan.  It's the US government's plan.

5:19

The US government is working for their paymasters, which are not American people.

5:24

And this is a kind of a global private mafia cartel.  But this is the US government, US military, DARPA, DITRA, and Fort Detrick.  the NIH, the CDC scientists, all of them, and obviously a lot of US dollars involved in the creation of both the chemicals that were used to generate initial COVID symptoms and then these lethal shots that are being deployed.

5:52

And China is a minor partner, they're an investor, co-investor or you know members of Communist Party leadership or co-investors in these vaccines.  And so they're financially benefiting from it.  They're not shielded, the Chinese population is not shielded from any of this kind of poisoning and dissemination.  They use their own poisons.  They do have a partnership with Moderna now to manufacture the same shots in China, the mRNA shots in China for the Chinese population.  So, you know, China is not shielded from it at all.  But they're a participant in it, not the leader.

6:30

Thank you.

6:34

Those folks, I'm going to strongly recommend that they look at your work very, very closely because they're smart and they're certain.

6:43

And it's a nuance, frankly, compared to the knife at our throat and what's happening.

6:51

And I'm really intrigued how you described

6:56

how the how something was given us maybe you said sprayed that's my experience my personal experience is I went out one night in late 2021

7:08

with a friend, we had a bite at an empty and small place.

7:12

I interacted with nobody.

7:14

I went to the restroom at the end of the meal.

7:17

I woke up the next morning sick as a dog.

7:19

And for the next 10 days, I got sicker, more achy, painy, more dizzy than anything at any time in my life.

7:29

And it took another 10 days to start to subside.

7:37

and I'm intrigued by, tell me what you can about how they gave a sickness before the vaccines, please.

7:47

Yeah.  Well, so, you know, I can't definitively determine what it is and it's long gone, right?  And also, it's not one thing.  They're likely using multiple modalities and vectors.  But what I can definitively tell you, it's not a virus and it's not a bioengineered virus.  And there's no ability to make living things in the labs, no matter what those fear-mongers tell you.  They don't have this ability.  They definitely don't have an ability to create something both highly deadly or toxic and spreadable at the same time.

8:23

So highly transmissible at the same time.

8:25

So you can do either one or the other.

8:27

You can create, and you can certainly create poisons.

8:30

That's, I mean, that's ancient art.

8:32

It goes back thousands of years.

8:34

So you can poison people.

8:35

You can poison individuals.

8:37

You can poison small groups of people in the same location.

8:41

And, you know, there are multiple vectors that can be used.

8:46

Water, food.

8:47

Today, we have certainly a lot of ability to create different chemicals, chemicals, toxic chemicals, also combinations of chemicals and biologics, such as, for example, DNA plasmids, which are starting point of all biologics manufacturing.

9:06

And so these kinds of things and also there's a long-standing

9:11

you know, experience and tradition, both in the Soviet Union and the in the United States, in the biological and chemical weapons development of aerosolization of things and also using subway systems as both test platforms and deployment platforms and also spraying stuff from the airplanes.

9:33

There were now, you know, infamous famous experiments that were conducted in San Francisco, for example, spraying

9:40

Due Diligence by Sasha Latypova

9:52

Um, so those methods exist.

9:55

Uh, they're now, they now have more capabilities to design both biological substances and chemical substances and deploy them in these ways.

10:03

And so you can, and so what you have described as your, your symptoms, those are symptoms of poisoning, you know, because poisoning as opposed to having, you know, a common cold is, uh, is basically very rapid onset.

10:17

extremely rapid onset.

10:18

And then you have this, this, you know, you're getting sicker and sicker and sicker.

10:22

And then it's just kind of washes out of your system over time.

10:25

And so you recover.

10:27

And that's what majority of people experienced, including me.

10:29

And in my case, the onset was hours, you know, so, and, and simultaneously me and my husband, that doesn't happen with common cold, you know, common cold takes time to, to, to develop those systems, symptoms.

10:44

But, you know, we went to a shop, we came out, two hours later, we have high fever, we're sick, and symptoms are neurological also, that very characteristic loss of taste and smell, very, very bizarre, it's not congestion, it's not common cold, it's a neurological poisoning, because we've inhaled something, you know, something that we were poisoned by aerosol.

11:07

So that's what I want people to notice in their environment.

11:13

Don't listen to what the TV tells you because they also simultaneously with these symptoms, they're blaring propaganda at you.

11:20

Oh, you know, people in China dropping on, you know, dead on bus stops.

11:24

And, you know, so everyone has this idea and they had this scary novel virus.

11:29

Well, they're spraying chemicals on you and creating the symptoms.

11:32

And then, but they were not lethal.

11:35

So you recovered, I recovered.

11:36

Yeah, it's, it's nasty, but it's not dangerous, really.

11:41

But it was designed to create panic to drive people into the hospitals where the kill box was deployed.

11:47

That's the first part of the kill box was to use panic fear PCR testing, which is which is false positive.

11:56

not diagnostic.

11:57

So they target people by PCR into the COVID ward and the COVID ward is operated by the federal government and by the military where they literally, you know, murder people by putting them on ventilators, sedating them, dehydrating them, removing food, not giving access to relatives, kidnapping them, and then giving them remdesivir, which shuts down kidneys.

12:22

and that creates, you know, fluid in lungs.

12:25

And then they're saying, oh, it's respiratory death.

12:28

And then they're calling it COVID and giving hospital bonuses, huge bonuses, 20% kick for using remdesivir.

12:36

And then giving bonuses to the coroner to lie on the death certificate that there was a COVID death, even if it was like a bullet to the head.

12:44

So that's how they created it, the COVID panic and pandemic.

12:51

And are you based in the United States?

12:53

Are you talking primarily about the United States?

12:56

Yes, I am.

12:58

I am a US citizen.

12:59

I live in Nevada.

13:00

And I am talking about the United States because that's majority of my research.

13:06

I did look into European situation as well.

13:10

This was

13:11

the same sort of COVID death protocol was practiced in the United Kingdom.

13:15

And I know this for sure.

13:17

In the United States, it is still practiced.

13:19

So as of late September, I have experienced this COVID death protocol with one of my relatives, we barely saved her from it.

13:27

And I, you know, I published on it, I went on media and interviewed in one of upstate New York hospitals, that protocol is still being practiced.

13:39

I believe on your sub stack, and I know other places as well, but on your sub stack, Sasha, you have presented more than enough evidence and documentation to convince a lay person and also professionals along these lines, right?

14:01

And that's the goal of what you're producing and publishing, right?

14:05

Yep, exactly.

14:06

I want the professionals to understand how exactly they were fooled because this whole setup was designed not to just fool general public who doesn't know any better.

14:16

It was designed to fool the professionals like myself who worked in pharmaceutical research and development for 25 years.

14:23

like doctors and nurses and, you know, so people of a professional class so that they close their eyes and fulfill the orders of CDC and don't ask any questions.

14:34

But, you know, I was out of the industry by the time this whole thing started and it really shocked me what they were pulling off and so I started looking into it myself and uncovering what really is going on.

14:48

And lest anyone think I'm saying

14:52

Read and Believe Just What Sasha Latypova Writes.

14:56

I know that Catherine Watt, Catherine with a K, at bailiwicknews.substack similarly has a body of evidence, facts, and figures that would have the same persuasion

15:11

And if you would agree with that, tell me.

15:13

And if there's a third, just for fun, before we go down other avenues, who besides you and Catherine would you refer people to so that they could get persuaded about the truth of the picture you've painted?

15:27

Yes, so I definitely recommend people to read Katherine's analysis because it helped me when I found her work over a year ago.

15:35

It helped me to finally understand what actually was going on.

15:39

So here's what else Sasha and here's what

15:43

We're going on right now, I'm reintroducing you, Sasha Latypova, and here is important information from TNT Radio.

15:53

You should hear what Ross Cameron is talking about.

15:55

I see there's a new trend taking place sweeping the internet of what they're calling sort of technology naked walks, where you go for a walk without your iPhone.

16:09

Due Diligence by Sasha Latypova

16:31

Ross Cameron on today's News Talk Radio, TNT.

16:32

I said, could she die?

16:33

And the doctor said she could.

16:35

It was so scary.

16:59

When I started clawing at my neck and trying to breathe and I thought, you know, what are we going to do if I die here?

17:11

How's everyone going to go on?

17:15

When someone's gravely sick or injured in the bush, they rely on the Royal Flying Doctor Service.

17:21

But now the Flying Doctor needs your help to fund vital medical equipment and supplies.

17:27

Please search Flying Doctor online to give a regular gift of just $10.

17:32

You can help equip the Flying Doctor's teams to respond to any emergency anywhere.

17:37

Search Flying Doctor online.

17:40

Become a part of the Royal Flying Doctor Service and help save lives in the bush.

17:48

The Net Zero Con will leave millions of citizens dependent on state handouts.

17:52

It isn't a theory.

17:54

It's an agenda.

17:55

There is no climate emergency.

17:57

On air 24-7.

17:59

This is today's news talk radio, TNT.

18:03

And I am Bruce Tataris.

18:04

This show is world staging with me is Sasha Latypova, intrepid researcher and publisher of the truths about COVID and the shots.

18:15

that the world needs to know so we can stop the noose from tightening even more around our necks.

18:23

Sasha, I had asked you about any other researcher or source for folks besides yourself and Catherine Watt, and you were in the middle of the point.

18:34

I got distracted.

18:35

What were you saying?

18:36

Did I interrupt you?

18:37

What would you tell me next?

18:39

Yeah, so definitely check out Catherine Watt's Bailiwick News sub stack, but also I want to point out other people that I personally respect very much and look at their work.

18:54

So Dr. Mike Eden is one of my friends now.

18:58

He's from United Kingdom and he used to be a

19:03

a very senior executive, executive vice president, I think at Pfizer, was running a respiratory therapeutic area research and development.

19:15

And he was very early on speaking against these COVID shots, the mRNA injections.

19:25

And

19:26

His predictions that he made in December 2020, he and his colleague Dr. Wuderk from Germany submitted a complaint, an urgent request to the European Medicines Agency to stop the approval of these injections.

19:41

they outlined all the risks and all the danger that they knew just by examining the design of the product.

19:49

So the product wasn't on the market.

19:51

They didn't have any access to the clinical trial data.

19:53

They were just external researchers looking at the design of the proposed product and outlining all the risks and danger that they were seeing.

20:03

And now, three years later, it's all true.

20:07

All of the things that they pointed out came to be true.

20:11

And so that's as accurate prediction as it gets and as accurate demonstration that this was purposefully designed to be dangerous.

20:21

There are other people that I highly respect, Norman Fenton, also from the United Kingdom.

20:26

He has very good statistics and analysis of excess deaths.

20:34

There are websites... Who was that second fellow, please?

20:38

Norman Fenton.

20:40

Thank you.

20:41

He also publishes on Substack with two other colleagues.

20:46

And another website is very interesting.

20:49

I early on collaborated with Craig Perry Cooper.

20:52

He's also a friend.

20:54

He set up a separate website where we were publishing information about adverse events and deaths recorded in VAERS system per manufacturing batch number.

21:05

And so that website is called How Bad is Your Batch?

21:10

howbad.info.

21:11

And it's very rich.

21:13

It's not very, you know, pretty.

21:14

It looks like Craigslist as far as the design.

21:17

But it's very, there's lots and lots of information and data from, again, from the very beginning of rollout of these injections.

21:26

And my work is there as well.

21:29

And we were the first ones who said, who pointed to the fact that the batches

21:34

had very different toxicity profiles, and which indicated again, at the minimum at the time, I saw that it was a breakdown of the manufacturing process and non compliance with good manufacturing practices.

21:46

And I was, you know, pointing this out and making presentations and speaking everywhere about it.

21:52

But now we know, we know definitively, this was also by design.

21:55

This was intentional and it was also confirmed by several colleagues, most recently from Denmark.

22:02

They actually even published a paper in Peer Review Journal confirming the same findings in Danish data from the government.

22:08

I just want to repeat those back if I could for people.

22:13

Michael Yeadon, Y-E-A-D-O-N, I believe, right?

22:17

Yes.

22:18

And does he have a substack?

22:20

He is on Telegram.

22:22

He doesn't publish on Stubstack, although he does comment on my publications.

22:29

But he has a Telegram channel with his colleague Robin Manotti.

22:34

And that one is very interesting.

22:36

They publish a lot of information about also geopolitics and climate hoax and all sorts of interesting issues.

22:43

Yep, anyone studying COVID knows Michael Yeadon and normanfenton.substack and howbadisyourbatch.com for folks to get informed, persuaded, and motivated to do something.

23:02

What are you

23:05

What are you focused on now in terms of continuing to study and bringing forth?

23:10

What's most urgent on your plate this week and next?

23:14

And, or what is the, if there is a single most effective tactic, strategy, or message you want to give to the world that could help us, what would you tell me?

23:33

Well, so the most important aspect right now is to help people recognize that the way the separation is run, especially in the United States, but also worldwide, is all of these crimes that they're committing,

23:52

And these are definitely crimes of murder, battery, psychological torture, theft.

24:02

All of these crimes are being committed legally.

24:07

So that's what people need to understand.

24:10

The most significant evidence of pre-planning and intent of this entire operation

24:16

is the fact that the laws in the US were put in place over decades preceding this to enable this operation to be conducted and everything that they are doing so far I haven't noticed

24:32

any significant violations of law that they've made, and this is by design.

24:37

They've developed these illegal laws, which Catherine Watt writes about, and when I found her publication, that kind of clicked in place for me, that starting from about 1980s, they have introduced this legal cage and the legal kill box,

24:56

and they build it step by step over decades.

25:00

It includes, first of all, it includes the idea of the public health emergency as a national emergency.

25:08

It didn't exist until the 80s.

25:09

It's not anticipated in our constitution.

25:12

It's not part of the constitution.

25:13

It's something the executive administrative state, deep state put in.

25:18

as the excuse to suspend the constitutional rule of law, which they have done effectively.

25:25

So that announcement of public health emergency based on no criteria whatsoever.

25:30

There's no hard data that needs to happen.

25:33

No demonstration of actual deaths or economic impact needs to exist for them to announce public health emergency as they did based on 40 cases in China and a few cruise ships.

25:45

Okay, so that that was their excuse to announce public health emergency, which suspends the, the, which actually consolidates all the power in the executive branch, and neuters legislative and judicial branch of the government.

25:59

And then from there, the public health emergency cannot stop until whoever announced it, which was HHS at this point, says so.

26:09

So we are still in a public health emergency based on HHS PrEP Act declarations, which people don't realize.

26:16

They think COVID is over, we don't have emergency anymore.

26:18

Not true.

26:19

It's been extended 11 times.

26:22

and it is now extended until December 31st, 2024.

26:25

So we're still in a public health emergency, except now they rewrote it to say, oh, COVID virus or any potential virus, any potential virus.

26:38

And that's why we have a public health emergency.

26:41

And then the second piece of this big legal kill box structure is the idea of these EUA countermeasures.

26:50

So what people think that being rolled out as vaccines and PCR tests and remdesivir and other therapeutics, they're not pharmaceutical or medical device products legally.

27:05

They do not have to comply with FDA regulations for, let's say, mislabeling, product adulteration, even putting poison into the product, known poison,

27:19

Even putting known transfectants into the product such as DNA plasmids which were found up to 30% contamination.

27:27

in Pfizer vials and Moderna vials.

27:30

All of that, and that all have been acknowledged by the regulators everywhere in here and in Europe and in Canada.

27:38

And regulators point blank telling us, yes, we know they're there, we're not removing the product.

27:43

You know why?

27:44

Because the EUA countermeasures under public health emergency do not have to comply with any law.

27:50

Sasha Latypova Podcast featuring Sasha Latypova Podcast featuring Sasha Latypova Podcast featuring Sasha Latypova Podcast featuring

28:08

and that doesn't have to comply with the IND or investigational research rules.

28:16

So all of that exists in the law.

28:18

So we have the laws that say that the government is allowed to do all of this and nobody can stop them.

28:26

So my point to the people today is somebody either a court or a legislative body needs to recognize

28:36

and take judicial notice of these laws and announce them wholesale illegal and dismantle them.

28:45

And that's the kind of the main focus of my work and Catherine's work right now.

28:49

And we're collaborating with several groups of legislators, legislators who have noticed and would like to do something about it.

28:59

And I think we need to have this momentum going and we need to have more legislators become aware more

29:06

courts become aware of this.

29:09

To make a court aware, somebody who is trying to sue Pfizer, for example, has to introduce this into their case, has to somehow build their case based on the idea that these laws are there.

29:23

Because what happens today, and I notice in majority of the cases who are trying to sue Pfizer, the plaintiffs go in and they say, oh, we were given experimental medicine and forced to take it and now we're injured.

29:35

Well, in U.S.

29:36

law, this is not an experimental medicine.

29:40

By law, it's not experimental.

29:41

It cannot be.

29:43

It's an emergency use countermeasure in the public health emergency.

29:46

And then the judges are throwing these cases out of court saying, no, it's not experimental.

29:51

You know what?

29:51

The judge is correct.

29:54

And then again, because the judges are following illegal laws and the cases are trying to

30:03

you know, sue Pfizer based on the wrong legal theory, what happens is, we're just solidifying injustice, we're just creating a whole bunch of case law that confirms that these illegal laws are actually valid.

30:19

So again, my point, somebody please notice these laws, these illegal laws, either in court or in legislators somewhere, and start dismantling them.

30:31

That is the rub, that is the bullseye, it sounds to me, that certainly every lawyer needs to be made aware of.

30:40

I would like to think that if every, maybe criminal lawyer, not every civil lawyer, but maybe every lawyer, if they comprehended what you just told me, and you're calling them illegal laws, are they illegal?

30:56

They're not, they're laws.

30:57

They're unconscionable.

31:00

They're unconscionable.

31:01

So the net effect of this construct is that we have mass murder.

31:11

Okay, so that makes them illegal laws.

31:14

and we can and I'm not a legal scholar so we can have a you know lots of debates around this but if some construct enables net result as as murder and and injury and harm yeah yeah yeah with knowledge of forethought should not exist to any sane person absolutely and I'd like to think more folks are saying than not if we could break the trance Americans are

31:41

Due Diligence

31:57

I have mercy for the folks who are hearing these kind of things for the first time.

32:04

I've been a reader of books all my life, so this hasn't surprised me when COVID emerged at this late stage in my life.

32:14

But for folks, I have a lot of mercy, but not enough to stop me from doing all I can to spread the word, because it couldn't be more urgent.

32:24

It couldn't be more diabolical.

32:28

It's intense, it's fantastic.

32:32

I remember years ago, brief little story, when I was researching things behind the scenes or how the world really works, you know, I was at a group of people and someone was giving a presentation on

32:49

how the Federal Reserve really serves private interests, it really does nothing for us, and that's putting it nicely.

32:55

And I asked a question to clarify, he said, yeah.

32:59

And I asked another one, he said, yeah, that's it, Bruce.

33:01

I said, you mean there's really a dragon to slay?

33:04

There's really a dragon to slay?

33:06

You know, we're in a really bad James Bond movie.

33:12

All of us, we really are.

33:14

We really, really are.

33:16

Yes, it is true.

33:19

The biggest challenge that we have today is compelling people to see the evil.

33:30

They don't want to.

33:31

They think that if they deny that it exists and they close their eyes,

33:35

and they pretend like, oh, everything's over and we just can go back to vacations and, you know, watching sports on TV.

33:44

That's, you know, I want to, you know, there's this urban legend, which nobody can verify anymore, of course.

33:54

The legend says that when Christopher Columbus arrived at the New World with his big ships and this amazing new technology,

34:02

the natives on the shore, most of them didn't see the ships, because in their frame of reference, nothing like this could exist.

34:10

They never had any anything in their life that would verify the existence of this.

34:15

And so they didn't, they literally didn't see them.

34:17

So there's this gigantic, you know, few ships landing, and they don't see them.

34:22

And, you know, and we know how things ended for them.

34:24

Right.

34:25

So that's my that's my message to everyone who is trying to hide their head in the sand.

34:32

Don't.

34:33

Because there's no way out of this by hiding, avoiding and pretending it doesn't exist.

34:38

You have to face it head on.

34:40

And then you have hope for overcoming it and slaying the dragon and surviving.

34:46

You remind me, like I've got a couple impulses in my head right now.

34:50

Wow, it's really hard if someone has a doctor in their family because they're going to believe the doctor in the family.

34:57

But I should rather think, let me talk to that doctor.

35:01

Well, let's get the eyeballs of more doctors on your sub stack and Catherine's and these other sources.

35:08

They have to be challenged.

35:11

Maybe more than most, I don't know.

35:14

Yes, exactly.

35:15

Because what this situation, what this crime is about, it's not about science.

35:20

Notice that all these debates about science that have been going on for three years.

35:24

And that's exactly what they want you to focus in this sort of debate that it's very hard to win.

35:31

and it's a distraction really.

35:34

What Catherine and I write about is not science, it's law and pharmaceutical regulations and how they're being completely subverted.

35:44

So doctors are not trained in law and they're not trained in pharmaceutical regulation either.

35:51

They only listen to pharmaceutical sales reps but they never look at actual, you know, how the regulation happens.

35:59

And we know, you and I know, that the journals have been co-opted.

36:03

The medical journals are co-opted to Brainwash, the tribes of doctors.

36:07

Sasha, let me reintroduce you.

36:09

Sasha Latypova, whose sub-stack is filled with the documentation of the things we've been discussing.

36:19

We shall return.

36:20

Here is important information from TNT Radio.

36:24

Give me a minute with TNT Radio's Steve Malzberg.

36:28

With Joe Biden behind in just about every presidential poll, the strategy of the left seems to be to go after Donald Trump even harder than they've been doing for the past eight years, if that's even possible.

36:38

And on the media side, Joe Scarborough, whose brother-in-law works in the Biden administration, seems to be leading the charge.

36:46

He Will Do, He Will Get Away With, He Will Imprison, He Will Execute whoever he's allowed to imprison, execute, drive from the country.

37:02

Just look at his past.

37:04

And as unhinged as that was, it's nothing compared to what New York Democrat Congressman Dan Golden said the other day.

37:11

It is just

37:12

a conversation for Due Diligence

37:27

Now after receiving some well-deserved criticism, Goldman apologized, said he didn't mean to use that word, eliminated, etc, etc.

37:34

This is all the left has left, so watch for more of the same.

37:40

Thanks for giving me a minute.

37:41

I'm Steve Allsberg.

37:42

Catch my show Monday to Friday, 9 p.m.

37:45

Eastern Time, right here on TNT Radio Vision.

37:49

My dad was a farmer.

37:52

The guy was bigger than life.

37:54

He wasn't someone that liked to show his emotion or like to show what he was struggling, but we all struggle.

38:01

I want to show emotion to my kids.

38:04

It's something that brings me so much joy, and I want them to see me working through things.

38:10

Allow your kids to know that it's okay to struggle, that even dad doesn't know the answer sometimes, but we're going to figure it out together.

38:18

Bruce DeTorres on today's News Talk, TNT Radio.

38:23

Sasha Latypova is educating me about her deep, incredible, horrifying, frightening, but important research into the legal kill box that has been erected over decades to facilitate the COVID agenda.

38:41

We were last talking, Sasha, about the importance of reaching out to doctors.

38:46

Did I interrupt a thought you were having about that?

38:50

Please tell me.

38:50

Yeah, I was just saying that, right, so the doctors are not trained in law and they don't understand pharmaceutical regulations either.

39:01

So this is the focus of my research and Catherine Watt's research is to uncover how the crime is being committed completely legally on paper,

39:12

and why it's been designed this way and why it's been designed to fool professionals such as doctors.

39:20

And would you, all right, so would you agree then, maybe you did, that if the top three or four types of Americans we could approach, who if they understood the truth, their influence would best leverage improvement?

39:38

Is it doctors?

39:39

And if so, who else?

39:41

Well, the doctors, yes.

39:45

You know, especially, you know, understanding how dangerous those COVID protocols and how they exactly designed to produce mass deaths and injuries, and how dangerous the shots are.

39:57

But I think people that we need to really reach are the parts of our legislative and judicial system that are still

40:09

left with people who still have conscience and people who still believe in the rule of law.

40:16

And I know I'm speaking about a small minority now, but I know they exist.

40:22

And so those are the people that we really do need to reach so that they can understand this and see the legal cage.

40:31

And once they see it, it's actually very easy to dismantle it.

40:36

You know, and there are so many times

40:39

In my years of muckraking, you know, corruption behind, you know, the military and the CIA and the assassinations and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

40:47

It gets mentioned.

40:49

There's only 435 members of Congress.

40:52

There's only a finite number in each of our state legislatures.

40:57

Instead of all the sports and other time-wasting things we do, if we had a lifelong habit of just a letter-writing campaign of harassment to these people, I say ejocularly, but I mean it, if more of us did even just that and then everything else, because what percentage of all the members of Congress

41:22

will

41:43

some that are intelligent and believing in higher principles and the rule of law.

41:50

What have been successful for me and my colleagues so far is actually going to local counties and for example in Idaho we have an amazing organizer

42:04

42:24

and same activity has gone on, I know, in parallel by different group of people, but we have been in touch in Florida and they also have been very successful in several counties and in the GOP, local county GOP group also signing on to these resolutions.

42:45

And while these resolutions are not lawmaking, it's just symbolic,

42:49

but they accumulate and then eventually that has to go into the state legislator.

42:56

And, you know, other legislators from other states are interested in also examining this, understanding, investigating.

43:05

We have been in touch with several.

43:07

There are several dialogues ongoing.

43:10

There is also effort to stop these injections, same injections being rolled out into animal vaccines, which is just horrific.

43:19

You know, they're now hastily trying to introduce mRNA shots.

43:24

for cattle, for example, which will basically do the same things that it's doing in people.

43:30

It will cause cancer, it will cause dysbiosis, it will destroy animals' microbiome.

43:37

I actually reviewed one of the vaccines that was approved by USDA.

43:41

It's manufactured by Merck and it's been approved for pigs.

43:44

And that vaccine actually kills about 30% of the herd within 21 days after vaccinations.

43:51

But USDA approved it.

43:56

Did they rescind it after those deaths?

43:59

Oh, no, no, no.

44:00

This is in the label.

44:01

It's part of the approval.

44:03

So the label on the USDA website on the last page has safety summary.

44:07

In the safety summary, we see that, you know, these piglets that were injected, 3% die right away.

44:14

And then another 27% have extremely severe adverse events.

44:19

They're inconsistent with life.

44:20

I'm pretty sure they got slaughtered after that.

44:23

They weren't sent to a piggy hospital.

44:25

So my question is, how is this approved on the label that this vaccine, you know, kills about 30% of your herd within 21 days?

44:37

And I'm sure on day 22, things didn't get much better.

44:40

It's just that the study was stopped.

44:43

So that's what we have to find.

44:48

And what might be known about the harm to people who eat such cattle or pork?

44:54

Exactly.

44:56

They can be harmed because these shots are just as contaminated with plasma DNA.

45:02

They're encapsulated lipid nanoparticle.

45:04

People are saying, oh, well, you know, it will disintegrate and be removed from cooking.

45:09

Not so much.

45:10

These are stable chemicals.

45:12

We don't know.

45:13

You need to do a study.

45:14

You can't just hand wave it away.

45:15

And yet that's what they're doing.

45:17

They're saying, oh, no, don't worry about it.

45:18

That's not going to happen.

45:20

And that's safety assessment.

45:23

You know?

45:25

Okay, while I recover from that, I'll just state a thought I pinned in my head.

45:32

Yeah, you described how so many representatives are groomed because they are corruptible, they'll go along with these heinous plans because

45:43

of their lust for money and power, which is why, obviously, I think we should write not just our personal representative in a district or anywhere, but all the representatives of our state and all the delegation from our state to try to find those who have a conscience and the ability to care and maybe do the right thing.

46:09

Not just our personal representatives, though, obviously them.

46:13

Sasha, talk to me if you can about the next thing that occurs to you or where you might steer me to.

46:25

Bruce, create your own effort in your county.

46:27

That's the answer to the question I was trying to develop, but are there resources or folks you would talk about or recommend along those lines for empowerment?

46:37

Right, so about the meetings with county officials, I actually also published on my sub stack the template letter and the actual letter that was signed by the Idaho counties.

46:49

Also the process step by step how to approach your county to set up a meeting like this, which Laura provided for me, which is very simple, but it's described and it has template language and the emails that you can send to them.

47:02

Due Diligence.

47:12

Yeah, so my colleagues and I, including Dr. Jensen Lindsay, Peter McCullough, Ryan Cole, who is from Idaho, and Kevin McKernan, and Renata Moon, she's a pediatrician.

47:28

So we, so Laura would organize a meeting with county, we show up on Zoom and do five minute testimony each.

47:35

And that was extremely effective.

47:37

So we can do that.

47:39

Zoom meetings.

47:39

Yeah.

47:40

Nowadays.

47:41

Yeah.

47:42

And drawing circles around that effort, it occurs to me to search, this is my homework to myself, to search for any and all legal or judicial or legislative watchdog groups in each of our own states and educate them, inform them, get them up to speed, get them on a Zoom, ask to meet them in their office, so that if they're in the business of trying to twist the arms of legislators, yeah, why not?

48:11

exactly exactly and now on zoom we can be very effective we can assemble a great group of experts both us and internationally and we can when we can do that yeah and walk them through a powerpoint and just you know give them something to think about and chew on and yes

48:35

How much time?

48:37

Well, I don't want to get personal.

48:38

I would, but you know, what of more driving substance about your effort and the information that's out there?

48:48

It's so easy to ask you, what's the most horrifying thing you've learned lately?

48:52

There, I said it.

48:55

Just fishing around for all I can get at you, Sasha, because you're a precious resource to me in this effort.

49:02

Well, I don't know about horrifying.

49:04

I mean, all of this was horrifying.

49:06

Yeah.

49:07

But the thing is, what people need to realize, the proper way to deal with any situation, no matter how difficult is to try to assess the reality as accurately as possible, as truthfully as possible.

49:26

And because if you're

49:29

mental model of what's going on is very close to objective reality, you're much more likely to develop a productive way forward, and also not get, you know, depressed and demoralized in the process.

49:45

And it kind of sounds counterproductive, because they say, what if my reality is super, super horrible, wouldn't that depress me?

49:54

No, but trust me, if you assess it accurately,

49:57

You are much more likely to look at it from a productive standpoint and come up with solutions, which will prevent you from being demoralized.

50:06

So that's my message to everyone.

50:09

No matter how horrifying what I'm saying, believe me, I am as horrified as you are.

50:14

It's just that I had more time to adjust to this and to figure out what I can do about it.

50:21

So, and I encourage everyone to try to learn as much as possible about the truth and try to figure out what you can do yourself or with friends to change the situation, to improve it, to get us closer to restoring our constitutional governance and the rule of law.

50:43

You answered a question I jotted on the break about strengthening people to look at the truth.

50:51

And you've equipped me and everybody with that encouragement.

50:59

I have a huge awareness of the challenge for too many Americans to have

51:13

dare I say, any self-confidence, any sense that they've got the power, the right and the authority to lead their lives, be the leader of their life, to affect things of importance.

51:32

We've been dumbed down for so many generations

51:37

you can anticipate, you know, the next half hour sermon I would give along those lines.

51:41

And with a heart filled with compassion, I'll add the suggestion to folks who might feel overwhelmed by these horrors, the importance of talking to yourself like a great mother and a great father.

52:00

And the model that works for me is a great mother

52:05

loves comforts soothes and restores and makes you feel safe there there everything's all right you're not alone i'll always be with you we'll get through this together

52:16

all that.

52:17

Okay, you know, calm down, Bruce.

52:21

And then a great father is the very, very encouraging, playful figure in my mental model.

52:28

Come on, we got a lot of work to do.

52:29

I don't know how to do it either.

52:31

We're going to make a big mess experimenting, figuring out how to build what we want or solve the problem we have.

52:36

And we're not going to finish it today.

52:38

And we'll go home and we'll tell stories all about it.

52:41

Due Diligence.

52:57

that's the crisis to me because there's just not enough I don't see enough humans with the ability to do that the folks who can do that work in corporations and work in the media and become doctors and lawyers and they're very very spry on air and things like this and they're very glib and they're very clever blah blah blah blah blah that's not enough we need all the folks who are suffering in despair who've never loved life enough to give a damn about it let alone do anything about it

53:24

to rally and it is with this love and compassion and encouragement I think.

53:30

Yeah, but that was also by design.

53:34

I mean, there are some really great authors on Substack, I was reading just this morning, describing also the history of mass demoralization, of removing the Christian principles from everywhere, from education, from day-to-day practice, even from the church.

53:58

uh for example and removing idea of adult agency that you can determine your own life that you can make this so now you know everything is about authority and and even I think even this whole campaign against bullying in schools is part of it

54:18

Well, you know, I'm not for bullying, but the whole idea that, you know, kids cannot resolve anything by themselves and always have to appeal to authority.

54:29

That's what it's being taught, right?

54:32

So you have to strike a balance between you don't want violence, you don't want

54:35

Due Diligence by Sasha Latypova Podcast featuring Sasha Latypova

54:54

Due Diligence

55:14

It's a full-spectrum effort, sashalatypova.substack.com.

55:19

Thank you so much, my friend, for coming back on such short notice.

55:23

I hope you had a great Thanksgiving.

55:25

I hope you have a great rest of your weekend.

55:28

And I hope we stay in touch.

55:29

And if I could ever help you with anything, ask me, let me know.

55:33

Sasha Latypova here on the awesome, incredible TNT Radio Vision.