Remdesivir increases the risk of kidney failure at least 20-fold based on the World Health Organization data

“Remdesivir (the only drug Fauci would approve) is a toxic drug…they tried it for Ebola…but actually had to abandon the study…because of the increase risk of death…” -Dr. Paul Marik pic.twitter.com/xr4zPoH9pC

— Liz Churchill ™ 🇨🇦 (@liz_churchill7) October 29, 2022

REMDESIVIR: SCIENTIFIC FRAUD. DEADLY FRAUD. FAUCI FRAUD

#Remdesivir is toxic. #FauciLied about the effectiveness by rigging the trial and presenting fraudulent trial results (before the trial was complete) while offering a 20% bonus on the entire bill for prescribing a failed, toxic and deadly drug. These people are war criminals. pic.twitter.com/UbhOEgHjOx

— To The Lifeboats (@ToTheLifeboats) February 6, 2022

"We knew we were going to kill people. That's premeditated murder. We knew we were going to do it, and we went along with it anyway"

'We Murdered People': Remdesivir – The Pseudomedicine Death Warrant for American Citizens

"It [Remdesivir] was so deadly that The WHO itself pulled the drug from consideration for Ebola treatments," denoted Dr. David Martin.

"We let that publication of information in 2018 fail… pic.twitter.com/yBoPi5zdbC

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) March 24, 2023

I don't have the language for your camera to describe what I think about those people

 

We're always up against the hospital lawyers who are basically paid by the hour. They are big law firms.  They have essentially an unlimited budget, and bot are they actively litigating against us to deprive people of medical freedom and medical autonomy even when they're dying and they want to take a shot at a drug that might help them.  And for which there is evidence thet are fighting like hell and I don't have the language for your camera to describe what I think about those people.  Even in Florida, we've litigated in Florida.  I've been involved in some of those cases in my brief time with the firm, and, the hospitals down there resist.  Now there's a "Right-to-try" Act in several of the states, but it's tough to meet the qualifications of the "Right-to-try" Act, so we're sort of relying on common law principles of medical autonomy, the patient's right to make choices within reasonable parameters where you have a doctor who's prescribed . . . it's like a prisoner's case because the person is in sort of a prison of the hospital.  They're in a ventilator.  They're sedated.  And they're restrained, so they don't have the two legs to go out in the market place and shop around for different types of treatment so that's when the judge has to step in and say "This person has the tight, or his representative has the right, to try this medication which could save his life.  And we've seen in our practice and we've seen it in our studies . . . it has saved many lives.  One of my legal briefs mentioned very early is, this is 2020, the research was already out there, that ventilators were counterproductive in many cases.  They might save your life one day, but the longer you're on it, they're really going to take your life away.  And the drug, the other problem we've noticed, is there's a drug called Remdesivir, which seems to have been used by many of the people who come to us and it's not working, it has side effects but they are apparently getting extra money to prescribe Remdesivir because it's approved by big pharma.  It's a patented drug.  

AVOID REMDESIVIR. TAKE NICOTINE LOZENGES

https://t.co/4YArprmTWn @Parsifaler it was snake venom they poisoned the world with it it’s in the water it’s exactly what RMDSVR is made of. YOU. WERE. RIGHT

— Maria Crisler (@crislerwyo) April 12, 2022

Plenty of studies showing that there are snake venom gene insertions in the vaccine, not just in the poisonous Remdesivir.  The great Jennifer Depew points out thar nicotine, yes, that ingredient in cigarettes, prevents this gene from sticking to cells.  Monoclonal antibodies are an anti-venom.  Makes sense now why monoclonal antibodies were being discredited because they didn't want to bring attention to tge fact that there is snake venom in the vaccines  Oh, great.  When does the . . . no, not when, but where does the demonic designs of these vaccines end?

The chimeric spike protein has bots of gene sequences from many pathogens, with the specific pathogenic toxin part. Lion teeth, eagle claws,
... paralyzing snake venom, why is that in a cold virus spike?
Unless it is to hurt people? https://t.co/cuCeh8fntC

— Jennifer Depew, RD (@deNutrients) September 14, 2021

Cause kidney damage is a good thing?

Cause kidney damage is a good thing? https://t.co/UdEKi4kTln

— Jennifer Depew, RD (@deNutrients) January 6, 2022

Remdesivir is toxic to the kidneys. That's been proven.  Fauci profits greatly from Remdesivir by having hospitals prescribe it. 

Remdesivir Murder Cases are now being accepted by Prosecutors

Remdesivir Murder Cases are now being accepted by Prosecutors. Take action now if you have a loved one who died…. @Charles04144986 https://t.co/2QYna0D8Fn

— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) June 28, 2022

ERIN MARIE OLSZEWSKI: Now I know that they were experimenting on patients without the patients' permission or the family's permission, and they were hanging Remdesivir even without our knowledge on these patients

"There were people that were coming in, dressed in all-black uniforms...and they were hanging remdesivir, even without our knowledge, on these patients."

Seemingly corroborating the stories of unidentified "death squads" that Deevoy says she's been made aware of thanks to… pic.twitter.com/R5MGXYfVJE

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) May 26, 2024

Undercover Epicenter Nurse: How Fraud, Negligence, and Greed Led to Unnecessary Deaths at Elmhurst Hospital https://t.co/dtFuKbS5TV via @amazon

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) May 26, 2024

Undercover Epicenter Nurse: How Fraud, Negligence, and Greed Led to Unnecessary Deaths at Elmhurst Hospital, Erin Marie Olszewski, 2020.

BREAKING REPORT: Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Against Several California Hospitals for Using Remdesivir Without Informed Consent as a COVID-19 Treatment

BREAKING REPORT: Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Against Several California Hospitals for Using Remdesivir Without Informed Consent as a COVID-19 Treatment...

— Chuck Callesto (@ChuckCallesto) September 12, 2022

Remdesivir Shuts Down Your Kidneys

In the mandated hospital protocols and the drug selected by Anthony Fauci to treat all Covid-19 Americans who were infected, I knew what I called then would be Anthony Fauci's genocide.  It was going to be how Anthony was going to kill hundreds of thousands if not millions of Americans treated in hospitals around the country and I have not gotten off of this ever since.  So the truth is in the memo that Anthony Foundry stated was that there was one drug and one drug only that was found to be effective in a viral trial against Ebola virus a year earlier and this experimental antiviral drug called remdesivir that at that time had never been FDA approved he said it was proven safe and effective against the Ebola virus but now we're going to use it in America as the only treatment of all hospitalized covid-19 SARS covid 2 virus infected people and so I had never heard of from Death severe so I selected the actual hyperlink on the nih.gov's website the National Institutes of Health

https://myfreedoctor.com/.  The best parts of this presentation come after the 18-minute mark.  

https://www.synergyhealthdpc.com/.  

Dose for adults with Covid-19 in hospitals.  0.2 to 0.6 milligrams for every 2.2 pounds of body weight for 5 days.  This is another Indian vendor.  

https://www.alldaychemist.com/. From that site, All Day Chemist, I received this reply to "Where are you located?" 

you can place order and within 30-40 days it would be delivered. We ship through postal service and your order can be tracked. Order will be shipped from India, Singapore.

B-Complex is vital to repair and rebuild the muscle tissue of the heart.

"You need to brush up on your policies so that you know how to handle a dead baby."

Michelle Gershman, RN in Fresno, CA👆 pic.twitter.com/Cr561hcju5

— “Sudden And Unexpected” (@toobaffled) November 26, 2022

Michelle Gershman RN explains how her hospital went from 1-2 stillbirths per month to 20 per month after the rollout.  The hospital told her how to deal with the increase in infant deaths per month by writing an email to her and the staff, 

You need to brush up on your policies so that you know how to handle a dead baby.

Michelle is a nurse in Fresno, CA, and she's been interviewed about her practice as well as what happened to her mom in the hospital following a diagnosis of COVID-19.  Apparently, her mom was given Remdesivir.  

Remdesivir, the protocol for hospitalized COVID care, is destroying kidneys

LORI SIMPSON: I won't even allow them to put in an IV because that's how they gave him all of the drugs that he did not consent to

The woman's name is Lori Simpson.  Her husband's name is John. 

"John was told by the nurses to defecate in the bed...He was double restrained...they took away all his dignity..."

"I had $1.8 million paid to [the hospital]. I think because he didn't die, they were out of bonuses, and so that's why they eventually discharged him."

In this… pic.twitter.com/9I6POZhkoJ

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) June 2, 2024

I was training the 1980s when they're were standards John was told by the nurses to defecate in the bed.  I was just horrified.  He was double restrained.  He had chemical restraints and physical restraints, and I was certainly taught that that was illegal.  That's not something you can do.  They took away all his dignity.  They just destroyed him as a man.  I said to him if I ever need to go to the hospital for a trauma or whatever, that would be the only reason I would go,  these are the things I won't accept.  I won't even allow them to put in an IV because that's how they gave him all of the drugs that he did not consent to.  They would just come in and say hey this is for this or that and push it through the IV.  So we are very careful, and there is no way that we would go back if we could avoid it.

So what do you think about all of this what was going on because it's not just your husband.  Absolute countless people having the same story but hardly any making it back home and it's still going on today.

It is still going on.  For us, it was pure evil for pure profit.  We had really good insurance because it was my insurance through Healthcare and they probably . . . from what I can see so far I had $1.8 million paid to them for John, and I think because he didn't die they were out of bonuses and so that's why they eventually discharged him.  And when they discharged him, his CO2 was high.  He had pneumonia on discharge.  He was so weak he couldn't even pick up his foot if a sheet was on it, and certainly he couldn't walk.  He was fully dependent on discharge.

And he had to go back into the hospital you said so what we're not 

He did.  He was discharged with pneumonia, so his stats were very low and I had to call the ambulance again.  I thought I was having an equipment failure.  He was on trach collar oxygen and nasal cannula oxygen, and I thought the trach that the concentrator had broken.  But actually it was him, and he was diagnosed with a hospital actually Hospital acquired pneumonia.  He went to a different hospital.  But I had sent him to an urgent care near us, and they wouldn't come out and talk to me because they were reading the notes from the first hospital that was talking about how violent I was.  I was always respectful, didn't even talk to the nurses.  Never got calls from doctors unless they wanted to do something to him, and then it was always a threat: do this or make him a DNR, a Do Not Resuscitate.  He had multiple pneumo thoraxes.  We took him to the you the ER to put one chest tube in the middle of the night.  He had pneumonia 2 days later.  The ER is a very dirty place in a hospital.  It's not where you should do that type of procedure.

Make sure you have an advocate.  Make sure you have advanced directives.  Make sure everything is spelled out.  I think that John did not get Remdesivir only because we had everything in writing.  When I looked at his lab values and everything else they did to him to orchestrate to getting him on the vents, he shouldn't be here but he is.  

COLBERT: Did Ivermectin do anything [for your bottom line]? FAUCI: No.

DR. FAUCI: Ivermectin "does not help with COVID and it could be dangerous." pic.twitter.com/mYEkoesgdz

— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) October 6, 2022

To say that Dr. Anthony Fauci is a liar falls flat because the extent of his lies, the millions of people he's responsible for murdering and maiming, is beyond the pale.  

Dr. Pierre Kory says that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine were the two saving agents early on that could have helped both the COVID sufferers and those suffering from the crippling side effects of the vaccines.  Yet, here he is saying that these two drugs don't work, and that the only drug that should be given is Remdesivir, a drug he conducted trials on and that killed 50% of its participants and for which he has a vested, meaning profitable, interest in.    

ATTY TOM RENZ: Dr Mercola just put out a paper where he discussed ventilators. That concept for ventilators came from China

#3 - “No one told the patients, hey, you’re going to be put on this vent. It’s probably going to kill you, but it may protect the healthcare workers,” testified attorney @RenzTom to the Pennsylvania State Senate earlier this year. “No one told the families that.” pic.twitter.com/Tk8t1f7iY1

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) November 1, 2023

And she has audio recordings of a conversation between her and a nurse I recently publicized.  The nurse is talking about how they're killing people in the hospital, how their floor was doing the things that no other floor would do because, well, no other floor wanted to carry out the murder essentially.  They knew what was happening in a lot of cases.  Dr. Mercola just put out a paper where he discussed ventilators.  Ventilators, that concept for ventilators came from China.  If you put a ventilator on someone's face, they can't cough on you, so we'll keep the healthcare worker safe, right?

Even though that we knew that 75% or so of the people in New York City put on ventilators were dying, we kept doing it to protect the healthcare workers.  That was the theory.  Now no one talked about that when the patients were going in there.  there.  No one told the patients, "Hey, you're being protected . . .  you're going to be put on this.  this.   It's probably going to kill you, but it may protect the healthcare workers.  No one told the families that.  And by the way, we actually had whistleblower testimony from a yet-to-be unmasked whistleblower, and probably won't be, who worked from CMS.  I've got data from CMS that showed in a number of Texas hospitals that as high as 90% of patients put on the vent died.  90%.  Now they wouldn't let you try Ivermectin but they were more than willing to put you on the vent where you had a 90% fatality rate you're telling me that they didn't notice the you're telling me that the doctors on those floors I mean listen you know I can't say all doctors are created equal McCullough is ahead above most.  But if you got through med school,  you could probably . . . I would think you would probably be smart enough to notice that when 9 out of 10 of your patients and when they're put on the vent die, at least maybe you should ask the question, Is there a better way?  Why not let someone try Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine if you have a 9 out of 10 chance of dying anyways?

The reason that that's dear to my heart is because the people called me and I fought with hospital after hospital after hospital to try and save their lives.  And as I testified last year here, we essentially legislated these deaths into being by incentivizing the use of Remdesivir in protocols incentivizing the use of ventilators, and incentivizing, again not people recovering from COVID but people dying from COVID.  You got a cash bonus when someone died from COVID.  So it was and incentive to kill people and it worked incredibly well.  I'm happy to revisit that but again my testimony from last year covered that.  

Babies born to vaccinated mothers were born with no ears at Clovis Community

They Killed My Best Friend https://t.co/K103SUf9UP

— Children’s Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) March 25, 2024

Clovis Community Hospital is located northeast of Fresno.  The nurse here explains how the hospital, by giving her friend Remdesivir instead of life-saving Ivermectin or Hydroxy-chloroquine, killed her friend, Lupe.  She also learned that babies being born to vaccinated mothers were being born with no ears.

HOW AND WHEN THE U.S. SURRENDERED SOVEREIGNTY

Bipartisan Presidential Executive Orders in 2003, 2005, and 2014 authorized the Secretary of Health and Human Services to detain Americans on suspicion of having colds and flus.

Third installment of the Callender Interview series.

Jan. 31, 2022 - Attorney Todd Callender explains the legal framework for suspension of human rights and civil liberties globally. Set in motion by the Bank of International Settlements in 1990, ratified by national governments in 2005, and implemented in 2020 with a “WHO-declared pandemic.”

Feb. 2, 2022 - January 19, 2017 Federal Register. US Health and Human Services final rulemaking, WHO International Health Regulations, and human liberty. 

OBSERVATION:

The governments of nation-states around the world can’t stop the mass murder and mass maiming of the world’s people through forced detentions (in homes, nursing homes, schools, hospitals, and quarantine facilities); forced masking and social distancing; forced withholding of preventative and early treatments for Covid-19; forced administration of ventilation, Remdesivir, midazolam and other lethal poisons; and forced administration of mRNA and DNA bioweapon injections, until those governments and their central banks (the Federal Reserve in the United States) are prepared to forego access to the international financial system controlled by the individuals who control the Bank for International Settlements.

One step would be the signing of a Presidential Executive Order revoking Executive Order 13295 of April 4, 2003; Executive Order 13375 of April 1, 2005, and Executive Order 13674 of July 31, 2014, and reinstating Executive Order 12452 of Dec. 22, 1983.

2005 - World Health Organization creates International Health Regulations, IHR

In 2005, through the World Health Organization, the individuals who control the Bank of International Settlements created the International Health Regulations (IHR).

The second edition of the IHR is described, by WHO, as follows: 

"In response to the exponential increase in international travel and trade and emergence and reemergence of international disease threats and other health risks, 196 countries across the globe have agreed to implement the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR). This binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007.”

The stated purpose and scope of the IHR are "to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade."

The IHR "are not limited to specific diseases, but are applicable to health risks, irrespective of their origin or source." 

The IHR further, "requires States to strengthen core surveillance and response capacities at the primary, intermediate and national level, as well as at designated international ports, airports and ground crossings. They further introduce a series of health documents, including ship sanitation certificates and an international certificate of vaccination or prophylaxis for travelers."

The 2005 International Health Regulations required each signatory nation to adopt implementing legislation, which the United States government did, through [among many other acts] revisions to 42 Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 70 and 71.

Those federal laws regulate interstate and foreign quarantine activities during "public health emergencies of international concern."

2017 - Major rulemaking by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

The most recent, major revisions of 42 CFR Parts 70 and 71 occurred through a "final rulemaking" by the Department of Health and Human Services, published in the Federal Register on Jan. 19, 2017, and effective Feb. 17, 2017. (See 6890 Federal Register. Vol. 82, No. 12)

The Federal Register entry reported that some commenters, during the public comment period, requested clarification concerning whether the World Health Organization’s (WHO) declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) could continue to serve as the basis for a ‘‘public health emergency’’ if the President or HHS Secretary disagreed with the declaration of a PHEIC on legal, epidemiologic, or policy grounds.

Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control respondents described such a scenario as “unlikely” and noted that “CDC remains a component of HHS, subject to the authority and supervision of the HHS Secretary and President of the United States.”

Another comment addressed the same concern from a slightly different perspective: the commenter “objected to referencing the WHO’s declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in the definition of ‘‘public health emergency’’ because this ostensibly relinquishes U.S. sovereignty.”

Again, HHS/CDC respondents said they “disagreed” with the characterization, stating that US government officials would "give consideration to the WHO’s declaration of a PHEIC" but would “continue to make its own independent decisions regarding when a quarantinable communicable disease may be likely to cause a public health emergency if transmitted to other individuals.”

A few paragraphs later, the HHS/CDC respondents again said that “it would be unlikely for the United States to formally object to the WHO’s declaration of a PHEIC, but that CDC remains a component of HHS, subject to the authority and supervision of the HHS Secretary and President of the United States.”

It’s very careful sophistry. HHS states that the US government is unlikely to even try to resist a WHO declaration, not addressing what would happen in the unlikely event of such an attempt. Presumably because it would be financially impossible for the US government to make the attempt because the Federal Reserve would immediately lose access to the Bank of International Settlements.

Other commenters expressed concern that "any disease considered to be a public health emergency may qualify it as quarantinable" and noted that some PHEICs ‘‘most certainly do not qualify as public health emergencies’’ under the proposed definition.

HHS/CDC respondents “clarified” that “only those communicable diseases listed by Executive Order of the President may qualify as quarantinable communicable diseases. For example, Zika virus infection, which although the current epidemic was declared a PHEIC by WHO, is not a quarantinable communicable disease.”

After dispatching with the comments, the HHS/CDC respondents concluded:  “The definition of Public health emergency is finalized as proposed.”

US Presidents’ Executive Orders since 1990

As it happens, there have been three Executive Orders issued by US Presidents related to the quarantine power of the Secretary of Health and Human Services laws since 1990.

They were promulgated under section 361(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264(b)), and they assigned the President's executive authority to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for implementation.

Executive Order 13295

On April 4, 2003, President George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13295, listing: 

“(a) Cholera; Diphtheria; infectious Tuberculosis; Plague; Smallpox; Yellow Fever; and Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (Lassa, Marburg, Ebola, Crimean-Congo, South American, and others not yet isolated or named) and

(b) Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), which is a disease associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, is transmitted from person to person predominantly by the aerosolized or droplet route, and, if spread in the population, would have severe public health consequences.” 

See Federal Register/Vol. 68, No. 68, p. 17255

The 2003 Executive Order revoked Executive Order 12452 of Dec. 22, 1983, which specified quarantinable diseases as including "Cholera or suspected Cholera, Diphtheria, infectious Tuberculosis, Plague, suspected Smallpox, Yellow Fever, and suspected Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (Lassa, Marburg, Ebola, Congo-Crimean, and others not yet isolated or named).”

In other words, in 2003, President Bush added the common cold to the list of communicable diseases empowering the executive branch, through the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to summarily detain American citizens and prevent them from traveling across state or federal borders.

Executive Order 13375 of April 1, 2005

On April 1, 2005, President Bush signed Executive Order 13375, extending the quarantine power of the Health and Human Services Secretary to include:

“(c) Influenza caused by novel or reemergent influenza viruses that are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic.’’ 

(See Federal Register, Vol. 70, No. 64, p. 17299)

In 2005, the executive branch of the federal government granted itself the power to detain American citizens for the flu.

Executive Order 13674 of July 31, 2014

On July 31, 2014, President Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13674, revising Section b of President Bush's 2003 order. The new text expanded on the definition of SARS [the common cold]:

“(b) Severe acute respiratory syndromes, which are diseases that are associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, are capable of being transmitted from person to person, and that either are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic, or, upon infection, are highly likely to cause mortality or serious morbidity if not properly controlled. This subsection does not apply to influenza.’’ 

See Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 151, p. 45671

Parsed, in 2014, the federal government expanded its power to detain American citizens for common colds, not only if the diseases are "transmitted" but if they are "capable of being transmitted . . . and are causing, or have the potential to cause a pandemic."

That's what made it legally possible for President Trump and President Biden, working through the Centers for Disease Control, to 

1.  place all Americans — including healthy Americans with no symptoms — under house/business/school arrest; 

2.  order that healthy Americans wear medical devices (cloth masks) without individual clinical diagnoses, without evidence of efficacy for infection control, and without a personal physician's prescription; and submit to forcible injection of mRNA and DNA toxins.

Combined effect of International Health Regulations and implementing national regulations and executive orders

Explaining the combined effect in the podcast interview, Attorney Todd Callender stated:

“It allows for, in every instance, a suspension of your human rights, your sovereign rights, your Constitutional rights, charter rights."

Iain Davis, author of Pseudopandemic: New Normal Technocracy, 2021, writing at The Disillusioned Blogger. 

LATYPOVA: . . . for practical purposes, homocide, as long as it's committed by the vaccine approved by CDC, is legal.

the laws have been amended and new ones have been introduced such that we have this now what she characterizes as the perfect legal cage in which nobody needs to be in on anything and no real corruption is really necessary.  --Sasha Latypova

Laws have been subverted, criminality has been legalised
Check out my latest podcast with @sasha_latypova pic.twitter.com/FB4EZ0d8Zy

— Dr Ahmad Malik (@DocAhmadMalik) March 20, 2024

So the laws have been amended and new ones have been introduced such that we have this now what she characterizes as the perfect legal cage in which nobody needs to be in on anything and no real corruption is really necessary.  Because for practical purposes, homocide, as long as it's committed by the vaccine approved by CDC, is legal.  That's the net effect of these laws.  So the combination of public health emergency declaration, and use of EUA countermeasures, which only exist under active public health emergency declaration, which is the PREP Act Declaration, issued by HHS Secretary.  So as long as they use those, they can kill and injure as many people as they want.  And they can never be prosecuted because they've been given almost blanket liability protection with this PREP Act with the exception of willful misconduct.  And the way that willful misconduct is defined in their legal opinion letters published on their website.  It says that as long as you follow our orders, it's not willful misconduct.  In fact, they are prosecuting people for not following HHS orders, for not using Remdesivir that shuts down kidneys and kills people, for not using ventilators, for not doing all those atrocities.  If they refuse, they get prosecuted.  But if they don't refuse it and follow the orders, it's not willful misconduct and you can't really prosecute . . . .

Dr. T is one of the so-called “disinformation dozen“ across US mainstream media and in every language as they targeted the 12 of us including Bobby Kennedy, Dr. Mercola, yours truly, because we reached more people than anyone with the Truth. pic.twitter.com/2yVzQ97Wbt

— Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News 🙌 (@unhealthytruth) June 20, 2023

And how is it killing the immune system this is really important the Pfizer shot because of the way they created it synthetically allows the messenger RNA to pass inside your cells and be replicated indefinitely by the ribosomes.  So you cannot get it out of your body.  So there's no detoxing from it.  Now can you detox your body and make yourself overall healthier? Yes. Are you going to eliminate the spike protein or the antibodies of the spike protein or the stupid monoclonal antibodies that they're advocating?  No.  Because you sensitize your dendritic cells and your B cells so spikes are going to be there probably forever the messenger RNA oblates, wipes out, destroys toll-like receptors 3, 7, and 8.  Toll-like receptors are like little radars that are constantly vigilantly looking around and getting rid of viruses and bacteria and things that don't belong there.  They are our innate God-given, what we're born with, immune system.  The messenger RNA shots destroy toll-like receptors 3, 7, and 8 which is our first line of primary defense, making us more susceptible to getting Covid.  And this is why all the people who get the shots suddenly are sick because they're more susceptible.  We know the mechanisms.  Doctors are illiterate and not reading it.  We know that people getting the shots are more likely to get sick and more likely to get hospitalized.  And if they're in the hospital and they get Remdesivir and they're put on a ventilator, that's a greater than 80% mortality rate.  We know the mechanism: the Spike protein enters the nucleus of our cells and binds to our DNA, so anybody who says it doesn't irreversibly bind to your DNA,  they're wrong.  They are not reading the scientific literature.  And when it binds to the DNA, it blocks the door and starts making it into an abnormal cell that if that cell replicates it'll turn into cancer.  And then it bars the door, it blocks the door, and doesn't allow our God-given immune system repair enzymes to come and repair the damage the spike protein has caused.  Hence, that allows cancer to form and . . . why we are seeing . . . and Dr. Ryan Cole has talked about this a lot . . . why are we seeing this explosion of cancers in people that get these shots.  People that have been in remission have been treated have been in remission and said they don't have cancer anymore suddenly they are exploding with endometrial cancer, all kinds of blood cancers, lymphatic cancers, breast cancer from the shots and we know the mechanism.  It's not a guess.  New data came out in the last two weeks that if a person is injected, they are 8.12 times more likely to be infected with Omicron. Again, suppression of your immune system, suppression of your white blood cells, oblation of your toll-like receptors the more shots you get the more you destroy your immune system in the faster that happens