One guy [Steve Kirsch] is a big tech One ID surveillance helpful inventor who came up the ranks with DARPA as a kid and went on to become a quarter billionaire in Democratic party Mega donor.
When COVID "emerged," he was involved with a Rockefeller philanthropy-administered fund that studied Remdesivir.
He is concerned about overpopulation.
_____________________________
The other guy [Dr. Robert Malone] is a lifetime biowarfare Industries medical countermeasures scientist. When COVID hit, he was involved with a defense threat reduction agency project that was designed to identify medical countermeasures for a novel entity, say a novel coronavirus. Well, that project came up with Remdesivir.
He is also concerned with overpopulation.
______________________________
These two guys found themselves on a podcast about "How to save the world" from the coronavirus pandemic with another guy [Bret Weinstein] whose brother [Eric Weinstein] was a consigliere for another billionaire. That other billionaire runs a CIA data mining site.
Ladies and Gentlemen, the Vaccine Freedom Movement!!! --Sage Hana
I recently did a survey on "overnight autism" cases and found that 33% happened 1 day after a vax shot and 50% happened within the first 3 days after a vax shot. That's causality!
Finally, one of the most damaging pieces of evidence comes from James Lyons-Weiler who got a call from one of the top autism experts in the world (whose name I know but will not reveal to protect him). He told James that “We all know vaccines cause autism. We just aren’t allowed to talk about it.” He was referring to his fellow autism experts.
If they admitted this, they would lose their funding, their job, their license to practice medicine, their hospital privileges, their board certifications, etc.
That’s why I can’t get a debate and when I try to reach out to these experts they ghost me.
And that’s why there are never the before:after studies and why all there are so many studies are designed to not find a signal.
ARE VACCINES SAFE?
None are tested against a placebo. Gardasil had a very small saline placebo arm, but for all the critical measures (Tables 5 and later), they either lumped in the placebo with the adjuvant control or they omitted the control group entirely in the table. See this tweet which got over 200K views
Wow. This is VERY DAMAGING evidence showing the drug companies deliberately obfuscate the safety data.
Vinay Prasad @vPrasadMDMPH recently pointed out Gardasil had a small saline placebo arm. True.
But for everything other than injection site reactions, they either COMBINED… pic.twitter.com/Ca1cyHFy3Z
— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) May 7, 2023
Peter Baldrige, former Assistant General Counsel of the Calif Dept of Public Health notified the agency they were violating the law by not investigating COVID vaccine injuries and deaths. They ignored him. So I will be filing a writ of mandamus which is a court order to force them to do their job. If the writ is granted by the court, it’s very likely that we will get to have input on how they do it. That will be a nice change, won’t it?
Who wants to see the data?
As Ryan Cole is fond of saying, “You will never find what you don’t look for.”
Let’s be clear. California is not looking into any injuries or deaths caused by the vaccines. They are looking out for the interests of the drug companies, not your health. They don’t care how many people in California have been injured or died. Your injuries and deaths are immaterial. They don’t care. They don’t even want to look.
The medical community in California is not better. They don’t want an investigation either. Have you heard of a single doctor, Dean of Medicine, or medical association in California calling for an investigation? Of course not!
Does Governor Newsom want an investigation? No way. Newsom himself is vaccine injured so he knows the vaccines cause harm. That’s why he dropped out of sight for weeks after his booster shot. A proper investigation would show that the vaccines killed people which means that Newsom instituted policies that likely lead to the untimely demise of tens of thousands of innocent residents of California and the injury of many times that number.
The only person who called for an investigation, as required by law, is the former Assistant Chief Counsel of the California Department of Public Health. He worked there for 27 years and is appalled by what is happening there now. They can’t take away his medical license because he’s not a doctor. They could try to take away his license to practice law, but he’s retired. This is a problem for them. They ran into someone they couldn’t intimidate.
'It's Time to Start Questioning Everything,' Including the Childhood Vaccinations @stkirsch: "[I asked Andrew Wakefield], 'Do the unvaccinated kids do 10% better, 20% better in terms of the health outcomes and so forth?' And he said, 'Oh, no! Not even close. It's like 10x.'… https://t.co/LzKAXvwhy8pic.twitter.com/3XKZguK7ZQ
Who is Andrew Wakefield? A doctor with integrity. Remember those? Check out some interviews. Though his Twitter page seems inactive, you can still find decent resources from previous years there.
And you know what, the average hospital bill is about $400,000 to $500,000 per COVID patient. Hospitals get 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill.
5:30 If you don't go along with their protocol, you'll be terminated, and they'll find anyway to terminate you. And we should know, that there are probably financially incentives. If you're diagnosed with COVID, you get a bonus. If you're intubated, you get a bonus. If you prescribe this ridiculous drug, Remdesivir, which increases your risk of death, you get a 20% bonus. So there are enormous financial incentives for them
. . . just for prescribing a drug?
5:55 Yes, for prescribing Remdesivir, you get a 20% bonus on the entire hospital bill.
Who's paying that, the U.S. government? Yes, so these are Medicare patients. If you're a Medicare patient, you get a 20% bonus . . .
On the entire bill?
On the entire hospital bill . . . . And you know what, the average hospital bill is about $400,000 to $500,000 per COVID patient.
6:27 Wow, so we're talking a significant incentive for the hospital to say "follow the protocols."
6:35 Yes, there's a lot of small chain involved. And that's why they don't like troublemakers who are going to interfere with their bottom line. I mean the patient outcome, whether the patient lives or dies, is completely irrelevant. It's all about the bottom line and profiteering and making money.
7:02 So, a lot of people think that we should be incentivizing hospitals to save lives and that hospitals should get $100,000 if they saved a COVID life. If someone checked in and is suffering respiratory distress, and the hospital is able to save that patient, they should get like a $30,000 bonus. They should incentivize the outcomes that you want, right?
Boy, is that a telling remark!
7:26 Yes, so it's upside down. You actually get incentivized if patients die, which is completely opposite of the traditional Chinese Medicine. In fact, if patients did badly, these practitioners weren't paid. They weren't incentivized if they patient did badly. We actually have a system where the hospital actually profits when a patients gets intubated, going on a ventilator, and dying.
7:52 So, what woke you up, what made you realize that the vaccine that you were asked to take and that you willingly took, what caused you to shift from being a believer in the safety of the vaccine, of the COVID vaccine, to now speaking out against the COVID vaccine? What was the moment that did that, or did that happen over time?
8:14 Yeah, so when the vaccines came out, I was vaccinated in December 2020. Firstly, I had no option, because I would have been terminated. Secondly, at that time, I believed the narrative. What can I say? I am like most doctors who've been brainwashed and indoctrinated, so I did believe the narrative. And then with time, it took time, Pierre figured this out much quicker than me. I was still a little bit on the fence, but with time it became clear. First, we had no idea what's in these vials. We have no idea what's happening. They were inadequately tested and they lied to us, and it became clearer with time that this was one big massive lie, that they were neither safe, nor effective. And as more and more data came out, and we saw from the VAERS data and multiple databases that they had lied to us and then it became clear.
9:20 So was it the accumulation of data that you were observing and instead of just reading the conclusions of the paper, you were looking at the underlying data. And were you seeing that first
14:05. Like, can you practice medicine today? Did they take away your licenses, or what did they take away from you?
14:10. Yes, so you know, this all happened independently, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Brian Tyson, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Urso, it's not like we conspired together. We just independently came to the same conclusion. If you look at the data, there's no other conclusion to see. My end result was basically the hospital [Sentara Norfolk General Hospital in Norfolk, Virginia] terminated my career for good.
14:40. You can't go to any other hospital because you're essentially blacklisted at this hospital which means you can't get into any other hospital?
14:47. Yeah, so they reported me to the National Practitioner Data Bank, and once you get into the data bank as a devious, deviant, bad-actor doctor, it's almost impossible to get out of it. Also, they reported me to the Board, and then the Board of Medicine came up with their own concocted charges against me. So, this is the problem if you try to speak out, try and speak the truth. The Board of Medicine accused me of prescribing Ivermectin to a bunch of patients who were injured. The truth of it is I've actually been able to prescribe Ivermectin. Ever. And the patients they claimed I treated are non-existent patients, so that tells you how far the virginia Board of Medicine will go to accuse me of prescribing Ivermectin to non-existent patients. I mean I never wrote a scripp for anyone.
15:50. So how did those non-existent patients actually do? Did they show you the medical records of those patients?
15:58. No, no what they do is the same thing as sham peer review. They accuse you of a crime but they don't give you the evidence. So in my sham peer review they accused me of 7 outrageous charges but they were unable to provide any evidence, any evidence actually to support the charges that they made. One of the charges was that I forced a nurse to give a patient a medication to which the patient was allergic. Now, I mean can you imagine something that outrageous? They were unable to provide any evidence that I'd actually done such a thing but I was assumed guilty as charged and I had no legal representation, and based on these bogus charges they withdrew my hospital privileges.
16:48. Is there a public record of this so that the public can get this record and look at the name of the patient . . . and maybe it's redacted. Is there a way that this can be verified independently by a 3rd party or is it all done behind closed doors?
17:07. So, if it's done behind closed doors, i was never given the name of the patient. So believe it or not, I was accused of this crime but the name of the patient was never disclosed to me, nor was I given any information regarding the patient. And it's meant to be privileged and confidential but obviously I am not going to hide it because it's an outrage, it's immoral, it's evil. So, no, I have written a little story about this because it's an outrage. I have shared this story with a number of representatives in the Virginia Legislature who know about this. And Robert Malone knows about it too. He's actually . . . he's doing a book and in his book he's going to cover this whole nasty episode. But this thing, it's not unknown. I was ignorant and never knew about it, but if you actually look unto it there's this thing called sham peer review, it's well-known. And it's what hospitals do to get rid of doctors they consider to be troublemakers.
18:17. So there's no public record, no record at all of who your charges, who your patients were supposedly? And why did they not reveal to you the name of the patient who you prescribed the ivermectin to because that's your patient. There's no confidentiality there, so why would they not want to reveal that name to you?
A data leak suggests the real reason health officials don’t want individual vaccine vials examined by independent scientists is that the vials are all different — and the mRNA in the shots is not intact. https://t.co/Ev6DyTekhh
While YouTube says that asserting vaccines are ineffective or have negative efficacy, oh, come on, let's not mince words, they don't work and they harm people, the latest coming out is showing how the novel mRNA inside the vaccine has been unstable and leaky. By that I mean that the mRNA inside the lipid nanoparticles have leaked because the vaccines have not been kept at a prescribed temperatures inside the vials. Dr. Mercola points out that
The reason, it turns out, is because the vials are all different — and the mRNA in the shots “is not intact.” Both of these pose potentially serious problems. In an August 31, 2022, Substack article, Steve Kirsch explains:
“Even if you are getting 100% intact mRNA which would be really rare, you’re still not getting anything that resembles the virus. So the efficacy as far as PROTECTING you will be next to nothing.
However, what it will do very effectively, if you got reasonably intact mRNA, is to cause you significant harm. You are playing a game of chance with your immune system and what is in the bottle.”
So, as YouTube tells you that contradicting any statement about the vaccines will be met with a strike against your YouTube channel. YouTube loves censorship. It may be the best thing they do. YouTube WON'T READ THIS, so there's little risk of them comparing their own statements with these facts.
The finding that the mRNA in the shots was of questionable quality was revealed in a BMJ feature investigation article2 published in March 2021. As explained by the author, journalist Serena Tinari, cyber attackers retrieved more than 40 megabytes of Pfizer COVID jab data from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in December 2020.
The hacked data was subsequently sent to journalists and academics worldwide. It was also published on the dark web. Some of the documents show European regulators had significant concerns over the lack of intact mRNA in the commercial batches sampled.
Compared to the clinical batches, i.e., the shots used in the clinical trial, 55% to 78% of the commercial shots had “a significant difference in % RNA integrity/truncated species.”
In one email, dated November 23, 2020, a high-ranking EMA official noted that the commercial batches failed to meet expected specifications, and that the implications of this RNA integrity loss were unclear. In response to the findings, the EMA sent a list of questions and concerns to Pfizer.
While we do not know if and how the EMA’s concerns were actually addressed and corrected, the EMA authorized Pfizer’s COVID jab December 21, 2020. According to its public assessment report, “the quality of this medicinal product, submitted in the emergency context of the current (COVID-19) pandemic, is considered to be sufficiently consistent and acceptable.”
Similarly, Health Canada told The BMJ that “changes were made in their processes to ensure that the integrity was improved and brought in line with what was seen for clinical trial batches.” The EMA further tried to deflect concern by claiming some of the leaked documents had been doctored. As reported by The BMJ:3
Vaccine injury cover-up is in the
interest of all affected parties (except the flying public), so don’t expect a
solution anytime soon. Flying will be Russian roulette for a while.
For passenger safety, every cockpit
should have at least one unvaccinated pilot. When the truth gets out, expect a
huge pilot shortage, and lots of class actions by pilots that lose their
license to fly.
The same vaccine injuries are
happening to our military. Did you notice that they never explained the cause
of the crash of the Navy F-35 fighter jet? They know
that if they can keep it out of the news, the problem just “goes away” (along
with a $100M plane).
If you took
the vaccine, you ought to get this D-Dimer test to learn if you've got
developing clotting going on. Dr. Ryan Cole describes it as "instant
clumping," following the vaccine, So now we know. Your blood clumps,
which means the clotting process begins immediately. To confirm this in
your own body, the only test to confirm recent clotting is a D-Dimer
test. Don't let your doctor deny you this.
Start at the
12-minute mark.
At the 16:30 mark, Dr. Ryan
Cole holds up a vile that contains a 12-inch long fibrin clot, adding that this
was pulled from a large vein Imagine what is happening in smaller
veins." So fatigue, pain, tingling, cramping, all could be the sign
that different organs in your body are producing these fibrin clots. You
need to get rid of them by surgery if necessary. Prior to that, get started on
the enzyme, Nattokinase, to dissolve these clots.
Start today. Please. I beg.
And, of course, if you've
taken a shot, you've still got a chance to redeem that decision by getting the
D-Dimer test and regardless of the result start on a daily regimen of
Nattokinase today.
Life Extension is having their annual lab test sale. 25% any of their lab tests. Self order, self pay.
I was coerced into shot a month ago as i have kids and been at my job for 20yrs. I asked for D-dimmer test & came out okay. I recommend everyone get one if you had to take 💉. pic.twitter.com/7LJo6bjEox
So far, the CDC has not determined
that any death was directly caused by the COVID shot, but that doesn’t mean the
injections haven’t killed anyone. Calculations using VAERS data suggest the
COVID shots have resulted in 212,000 excess deaths in the U.S.
An estimated 300,000 Americans suffered
permanent disability from the COVID shots, and anywhere from 2 million to 5
million may have suffered adverse reactions
If you’re under the age of 50, your
risk of dying from the vaccine is greater than your chance of dying from
COVID-19
Dr. Peter Schirmacher, chief
pathologist at the University of Heidelberg, who is recognized as one of the
top 100 pathologists in the world, autopsied 40 patients who died within two
weeks of their COVID jab, and found 30% to 40% of the deaths were conclusively
due to the shot
One top neurologist claims to have
2,000 reportable vaccine injuries in 2021, compared to zero in the last 11
years. In all, 5% of her existing patients now have suspected vaccine injuries,
but she has only filed two VAERS reports due to the complexity of the filing
Yesterday, October 8, 2021, I published
a Highwire exclusive interview with Deborah Conrad, a physician’s assistant who
is blowing the whistle on COVID jab injuries, and the fact that these injuries
are rarely reported because of a faulty VAERS database design.
Today you’re in for yet another
bombshell video: “Vaccine Secrets: COVID Crisis.” It’s the first episode of
“The False Narrative Takedown Series,” produced by Steve Kirsch, executive
director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund.
“Vaccine Secrets” complements and
supports everything Conrad shared in her interview, so I highly recommend
saving these files on your computer and watching both of them. Both are
available on Bitchute.
HOW MANY HAVE DIED FROM THE COVID JABS?
According to Kirsch, the COVID shots
have already killed an estimated 200,000 Americans, a far higher number than
the 15,386 deaths reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
(VAERS) as of September 17, 2021.1 You can find all the
research for Episode 1 of the “False Narrative Takedown” series on SKirsch.io/vaccine-resources.2
As noted by Kirsch, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky claims no causative link
has been found for any of these deaths. She’s not lying, per se. But she’s also
not telling the whole truth.
So far, the CDC has not determined that
any death was directly caused by the COVID shot, but that doesn’t mean the
injections haven’t killed anyone. In this episode, Kirsch sets out to determine
whether evidence of causality exists, and if so, what the actual death toll is
likely to be.
CAN VAERS DATA DEMONSTRATE CAUSALITY?
The big disconnect, Kirsch points out,
is that the CDC insists that VAERS, as an early warning system, cannot prove
(or disprove) causality. Kirsch argues that this is false. The idea that VAERS
cannot show causality is part of how and why the CDC can claim none of the
deaths is attributable to the COVID shot.
To prove his point, Kirsch gives the
following analogy: Suppose you give a two-dose vaccine. After the first dose,
nothing happens, but after the second dose, people die within 24 hours of a
deep vein thrombosis (DVT). When you look at the VAERS data, what you would
find is no reports associated with the first dose, and a rash of deaths after
the second dose, and all within the same timeframe and with the same cause of
death.
According to the CDC, you cannot
ascribe any causality at all from that. To them, it’s just random chance that
everyone died after the second dose, and from the same condition, and not the
first dose or from another condition.
Kirsch argues that causality CAN be
identified from this kind of data. It’s very difficult to come up with another
explanation for why people die exactly 24 hours after their second dose.
For example, is it reasonable to assume
that people with, say, undiagnosed heart conditions would die exactly 24 hours
after getting a second dose of vaccine? Or that people with undiagnosed
diabetes would die exactly 24 hours after their second dose?
Why not after the first dose, or two
months after the second dose, or any other random number of hours or days, or
for other random cause of death? Why would people randomly die of the same
condition at the exact same time, over and over again?
VACCINE PROGRAM NEEDS TO BE HALTED IMMEDIATELY
According to Kirsch, the vaccination
program should be immediately halted, as the VAERS data suggest more than
200,000 Americans have already died, and more than 2 million have been
seriously injured by the vaccines. Interestingly enough, Kirsch and his entire
family took the COVID shot early on, so he’s not coming from an “anti-vax”
position.
Ending the vaccinations would not spell
disaster in terms of allowing COVID-19 to run rampant, as we now know there are
safe and effective early treatment protocols that everyone can use, both at
home and in the hospital. These treatments also work for all variants.
According to Kirsch, the CDC, the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health are all
“spreading misinformation about the vaccine versus early treatment.” In a
nutshell, these agencies are saying the complete opposite of what is true —
classic Orwellian doublespeak.
They claim the COVID shots are safe and
effective, when the data show they’re neither, and they say there is no safe
and effective early treatment, which is clearly false. At the same time, our
medical freedoms are being stripped away under the guise of public health — all
while an immense death toll is allowed to take place right before our eyes.
Kirsch is so confident in his analyses,
he’s offered a $1 million academic grant to anyone who can show his analysis is
flawed by a factor of four or more. So far, no one has stepped up to claim the
prize. He’s even offered $1 million to any official willing to simply have a
public debate with him about the data, and none has accepted the challenge.
As noted by Kirsch, “we’ve replaced
debates as a way to settle scientific disagreements … with government-driven
censorship and intimidation.” Medical recommendations are now also driven by
the White House rather than medical experts and doctors themselves.
FALSE NARRATIVES OVERVIEW
In this episode, Kirsch goes through
five false narratives about COVID jab safety, namely that:
1.The shots are safe and effective
2.No one has died from the COVID shot
3.You cannot use VAERS to determine
causality
4.The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is
harmless
5.Only a few adverse events are
associated with the shots and they’re all “mild”
He also reviews the five false
narratives about what the solutions are:
1.Vaccines are the only way to end the
pandemic
2.Vaccine mandates are therefore needed
3.Masks work
4.Early treatments do not work
5.Ivermectin is dangerous
COVID SHOT KILLS 5 TIMES MORE PEOPLE THAN IT SAVES
Kirsch cites information from Dr. PeterSchirmacher, chief pathologist at the University of Heidelberg, who is
recognized as one of the top 100 pathologists in the world.
Schirmacher did autopsies on 40
patients who died within two weeks of their COVID jab, and found 30% to 40% of
them were conclusively due to the shot, as there was no other underlying
pathology that could have caused the deaths. Now, he did not rule out that 100%
of the deaths could have been caused by the shots. He just could not
conclusively prove it.
There’s also Pfizer’s six-month study, which
included 44,000 people. During the blinded period of the study, the deaths were
just about even — 15 deaths in the vaccine group and 14 in the control group.
So, one life was saved by the shot.
But then, after the study was unblinded
and controls were offered the vaccine, another three in the original vaccine
group died along with two original placebo recipients who opted to get the
shot. None of these deaths was considered related to the Pfizer “vaccine,” yet
no one knows what they actually died from.
So, the final tally ended up being 20
deaths in the vaccine group and 14 deaths in the control group. What this tells
us is the Pfizer shot offers no all-cause mortality benefit. The shot saved one
life, and killed six, which gives us a net-negative mortality rate. The reality
is that five times more people are killed by the shot than are saved by it.
HOW TO CALCULATE EXCESS MORTALITY
In the video, Kirsch explains how
anyone can calculate the number of COVID shot deaths using VAERS data. What
we’re looking at here is excess deaths, not background deaths of people who
were going to die from a natural cause, such as old age, anyway. In summary,
this is done by:
1.Determining the propensity to report
2.Determining the number of domestic
deaths in the VAERS database
3.Determining the underreporting factor
for serious events
4.Determining the background death rate,
i.e., all deaths reported to VAERS by year
5.Calculating the number of excess deaths
Lastly, you would validate your
findings using independent methods or comparing it to what others have found.
Step-by-step instructions and calculations can be found in the document called
“Estimating the Number of Vaccine
Deaths in America.”3
MORE THAN 200,000 HAVE LIKELY BEEN KILLED BY THE JABS
Between the documentation on his
website and the video, you get a detailed in-depth understanding of how to do
this and how Kirsch came to the conclusions made. Here, I will simply provide a
summary rundown of Kirsch calculations and conclusions:
1.Propensity to report = same as in
previous years
2.Number of domestic deaths in the VAERS
database = 6,167 as of August 27, 2021
3.Under-reporting factor for serious
events = 41 (i.e., for every 41 events, only one is reported)
4.Background VAERS death rate = 500 per
year (this background death number will be subtracted twice, as most COVID jab
recipients are receiving two doses. This gives us a very conservative estimate)
5.Excess deaths calculation = (6,167 – 2
x 500) x 41 = 212,000 excess deaths
Using the same calculation methods,
Kirsch conservatively estimates more than 300,000 Americans have also been
permanently disabled by the COVID shots. These estimates have been validated by
four teams of researchers using other methods. (None of them used VAERS data.)
If you’re under the age of 50, your
risk of dying from the vaccine is greater than your chance of dying from
COVID-19.
Kirsch also demonstrates another
calculation to show the COVID shots kill more people than the actual COVID-19
infection does. That calculation also shows that if you’re under the age of 50,
your risk of dying from the vaccine is greater than your chance of dying from
COVID-19, so it makes no sense from a risk-benefit perspective to get the jab
if you’re younger than 50.
What’s more, since your risk of natural
infection exponentially decreases over time (as natural herd immunity grows,
your chance of infection approximately halves each year), the risks of the
COVID shot rapidly outgrow any potential benefit with each passing year.
EXAMPLES OF ADVERSE EVENTS
Kirsch has also analyzed adverse events
by symptom, calculating the rate at which they occur after the COVID shots
compared to the average rate seen for all other vaccines combined from 2015- to
2019 for ages 20 to 60. Here’s a sampling:4
Pulmonary embolism occurs at a rate
473 times higher than the normal incidence rate (i.e., if there was one
pulmonary embolism event reported in VAERS on average for all vaccines, there
were 473 events following a COVID injection)
Stroke, 326 times higher
Deep vein thrombosis 264.3 times
higher
Appendicitis 145.5 times higher
Parkinson's disease is 55 times higher
Blindness 29.1 times higher
Deafness 44.7 times higher
Death 58.1 times higher
Interestingly, the most common cause of
death in children aged 12 to 17 who got the COVID shot was pulmonary embolism.
This was determined by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
(ACIP) after analyzing the deaths of 14 children. Coincidence? Or evidence of
causality?
ANECDOTES AND OTHER DATA CONSISTENT WITH HIGH DEATH RATE
Kirsch also cites anecdotal data that
can clue us in to what’s happening. One top neurologist claims to have 2,000
reportable vaccine injuries in 2021, compared to zero in the last 11 years.
In all, 5% of her existing patients now
have suspected vaccine injuries. Yet this neurologist has only reported two of
them because she got so frustrated with the VAERS system. So, in this
instance, the under-reporting rate is not 41, but 1,000. And she’s not alone.
This is another classic real-world illustration of what the PA Deborah Conrad
shared in yesterday’s article.
Canadian physician Dr. Charles Hoffe
has also reported that 60% of his COVID jabbed patients have elevated D-dimer
levels, which is indicative of blood clotting, and levels in many cases
remained elevated for up to three months.
This too is evidence of causation,
because your D-dimer level is a marker for blood clotting. Even if you don’t
have obvious symptoms of clotting, it can indicate the presence of micro clots.
Hoffe discusses this in the video below.
Dr. Peter McCullough has also reported
that troponin levels are elevated in many vaccinated patients. Troponin is a marker
for heart damage, such as when you’re having a heart attack or myocarditis
(heart inflammation). A level between 1 and 4 is indicative of an acute or
recent heart attack. In case of a serious heart attack, troponin can remain
elevated for five days.
In many patients who have received the
COVID jab, the troponin level is between 35 and 50(!) and remains at that level
for up to two months, which suggests massive damage is occurring to the heart.
Yet this is what they’re routinely labeling as “mild” myocarditis. There’s
absolutely nothing mild about this level of heart damage.
NO RATE OF INJURY OR DEATH IS TOO GREAT
Unbelievably, there seems to be no
ceiling above which the death and disability toll is deemed too great. Why
aren’t the FDA and CDC concerned about safety when more than half a million
side effect reports have been filed? How come nearly 15,000 reported deaths5 haven’t
set off emergency alarms and in-depth investigations? Historically, 50 deaths
have been the cutoff point at which a vaccine is pulled.
Considering the unprecedented risks of
these shots, I urge you to review as much data as you can before you jump on
the booster bandwagon. Based on everything I’ve seen, I believe the risk of
side effects is likely going to exponentially increase with each dose.
