If they admitted [that vaccines cause autism] they would lose their funding, their job, their license to practice medicine, their hospital privileges, their board certifications, etc

I recently did a survey on "overnight autism" cases and found that 33% happened 1 day after a vax shot and 50% happened within the first 3 days after a vax shot. That's causality!

For info on the mechanisms, see: https://t.co/EZH4ZdQyKR

— Steve Kirsch (@stkirsch) July 22, 2023

THE ADMISSION OF A TOP AUTISM EXPERT

Finally, one of the most damaging pieces of evidence comes from James Lyons-Weiler who got a call from one of the top autism experts in the world (whose name I know but will not reveal to protect him). He told James that “We all know vaccines cause autism. We just aren’t allowed to talk about it.” He was referring to his fellow autism experts.

If they admitted this, they would lose their funding, their job, their license to practice medicine, their hospital privileges, their board certifications, etc.

That’s why I can’t get a debate and when I try to reach out to these experts they ghost me.

And that’s why there are never the before:after studies and why all there are so many studies are designed to not find a signal.

ARE VACCINES SAFE?

None are tested against a placebo.  Gardasil had a very small saline placebo arm, but for all the critical measures (Tables 5 and later), they either lumped in the placebo with the adjuvant control or they omitted the control group entirely in the table. See this tweet which got over 200K views

Wow. This is VERY DAMAGING evidence showing the drug companies deliberately obfuscate the safety data.

Vinay Prasad @vPrasadMDMPH recently pointed out Gardasil had a small saline placebo arm. True.

But for everything other than injection site reactions, they either COMBINED… pic.twitter.com/Ca1cyHFy3Z

— Steve Kirsch (@stkirsch) June 30, 2023

PAPER: "Statistical and Numerical Errors Made by the US CDC During the COVID-19 Pandemic."

By Tom Woods 

I keep talking about historians of the future -- if we have any honest ones, our "public health" institutions are not going to come out looking too good.

A new paper has just been released that I thought you might want to know about. It's called: "Statistical and Numerical Errors Made by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention During the COVID-19 Pandemic."

The paper has four authors, three of whom are academics at the University of California, San Francisco, and one of whom (Kelley Krohnert) is an independent scholar.

Kelley, I am happy to point out, was a guest on the Tom Woods Show after she, an independent analyst affiliated with no university or institution, demolished the CDC's scaremongering claims about the threat of Covid to children, claims that were obviously intended to encourage panicked parents to give their children the shots.

Eighty percent of the errors the four authors examine in this paper involve -- what a surprise -- exaggerating Covid risks.

As one of the authors, Vinay Prasad, put it:

These errors are going to be hard to dispute. They are factually wrong . . . . 

The CDC uses statistics that consistently inflate deaths among children, while it recommended many restrictions on this age group.

These are not errors of interpretation or preference but demonstrably false numbers. Horrific that the CDC has made these errors and in some cases still [has] not issued a correction, and even repeated the errors . . . .

We need more papers like this!  

Almost there . . .