Showing posts with label 2025. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2025. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 22, 2025

JOHN CULLEN: In 2019, we imported something like 15 million dozen eggs from China

The cage-free eggs, you know, the commercial eggs, we imported, at least in 2019, we imported 15 million dozen eggs from China into our country.  We imported 15 million dozen eggs from China in 2019.  I don't have the number for 2020 because supposedly they didn't keep track, so . . .  --Nicolette

Monday, April 21, 2025

PYREX vs. pyrex: What Is the Difference? Buy PYREX, not pyrex

Corelle owns pyrex, and Corning owns PYREX.  PYREX glassware was made with borosilicate that allowed for fluctuations in temperatures without cracking.  Good to know.  Lower case pyrex is not.  

MATT ROESKE: The term "medications" is preferred over "drugs" in healthcare settings to emphasize the substances are being used for therapeutic purposes and to avoid negative connotations associated with the word "drugs"

I don't like the fact that he makes claims without the actual physical evidence. What I mean by that is thought is in the realm of light. Things that you can see and touch and have a physical component in life are made of carbon. Let's see the carbon version of his evidence.

In just a few months, over 3000 babies were born with microcephaly.  Without any scientific evidence, the government assumed the disease was caused by the Zika virus.  However, Australian researchers have now revealed that the true cause of the disease was the toxicity of the mandatory DTPa vaccine given to pregnant women the year before.  The vaccines were funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Note how they're still trying to hide the fact that this condition was caused by the toxic vaccine.  This is Page 1 of a DuckDuckGo search for "Australian researchers and Brazilian microencephalia."

Deconstructing Zika: The Pandemic That Never Was, Dr. Randall Bock, (Portuguese Edition) Paperback – July 25, 2022.

Sunday, April 20, 2025

SASHA LATYPOVA: And [the U.S. Army] have been using it, obviously, for 60 years. They've evaded all kinds of... legal recourse. They've evaded it.

The US Army and the CDC working in concert against the American people?  Say it isn't so.

WOW! Are flu "pandemics" caused by the Army spraying chemical agents from airplanes? "[The 1957] Asian flu pandemic was announced...after this ['large area coverage'] spraying [by the U.S. Army]...CDC came in and said, 'There's a new virus.' ... Does this sound familiar?" Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Dr. Jane Ruby (@RealDrJaneRuby) during a recently posted interview on The Dr. Jane Ruby Show how the spraying of chemical agents from U.S. Army airplanes has been associated with respiratory illnesses. Latypova highlights one instance from the late 1950s when the CDC declared an ostensible outbreak of so-called "Asian flu pandemic" in the U.S. closely following a cross-country spraying campaign conducted by the Army. "Does this sound familiar?" Latypova asks rhetorically. The pharma insider also ties her research into chemtrail samples collected by Ruby, which were subsequently analyzed by Mike Adams (). Latypova notes that Adams found zinc cadmium sulfide (ZnCdS)—a compound formed by a mixture of zinc sulfide (ZnS) and cadmium sulfide (CdS)— in Ruby's sample and that this exact compound was sprayed by the Army in the '50s and '60s. "Interestingly," Latypova says, "the Army used these fluorescent particles as a test of dispersals in numerous tests over the years. One of the largest ones they did was called 'large area coverage operation' or 'Operation LAC.' And in this operation they flew thousands of flights that crisscrossed the entire United States. This was to disperse these particles all over the United States in 1957. They started, interestingly, on December 2nd, 1957, went through the winter season of '57 to '58, flew all over U.S. [and] dispersed the particles. And, interestingly, in that season, we had [a] so-called 'Asian flu pandemic.'" PARTIAL TRANSCRIPTION OF CLIP "I was trying to see what the Army was using as different agents for biological and chemical warfare. And what I found kinda corresponds to what Mike Adams and you found in the samples that you were sampling. There were many more materials found, but some of the materials that, I believe, you guys found are those that the Army was using in their official bioweapons development projects and field tests, back in the '50s and '60s. "So, yeah, that's why it's important because that history teaches us that, you know, this has been going on for a long time. And also that history can show what legal loopholes and what procedures they were using to avoid any liability [or] accountability... So what methods and what levers are they using. And they have been using it, obviously, for 60 years. They've evaded all kinds of... legal recourse. They've evaded it. "And so this is important to understand how they were doing it. So what I found, in the '50s and the '60s, there were numerous operations. So the official bioweapons development programs always dealt with bacterial agents. So, in fact, originally, they were, this program was called bacteriological weapons, not bioweapons. So none of it ever had to do with viruses. It was always bacteria and chemical agents. "And one of the chemical agents that was used by the Army, ostensibly to study airflow over the United States and to study the dispersal patterns of any aerosolized material were these so-called fluorescent particles or zinc cadmium sulfide. And both zinc and cadmium were found in large quantities by Mike in the samples that you provided. "So I think one of the agents that are being sprayed is these fluorescent particles because they've always done it. And these particles are easy to track because they fluoresce. But they contain zinc and cadmium, and the Army claimed always that they are benign. But if you look at the CDC's technical sheets, they [say] it's dangerous. It can cause illness, and it can bioaccumulate. So enough of it distributes on the ground, in the soil, and in the plants and animals, and ultimately gets into humans. But also if humans inhale them, they cause, guess what? Respiratory illness—flu-like illness. And they also can cause kidney damage, depending maybe [on] if you digest it. So, they can cause kidney damage and bone musculoskeletal issues, but, interestingly, they do cause respiratory flu-like infections. "So, interestingly...the Army used these fluorescent particles as a test of dispersals in numerous tests over the years. One of the largest ones they did was called 'large area coverage operation' or 'operation LAC.' And in this operation they flew thousands of flights that crisscrossed the entire United States. This was to disperse these particles all over the United States in 1957. They started, interestingly, on December 2nd, 1957, went through the winter season of '57 to '58. Flew all over U.S., dispersed the particles, [and,] due to air currents. some of it went over Canada. And, interestingly, in that season, we had [a] so-called Asian flu pandemic.

"So [an] Asian flu pandemic was announced after this spraying [of] the U.S. population and Canadian population...[and then the] CDC [came in and said] there was a new virus in China, and it spread all over the world, and we have an Asian flu pandemic now. Does this sound familiar?" 

Here is the complete interview.

Friday, April 18, 2025

AESTHETICPRIMAL: pig lard on the scalp outperformed Minoxidil and managed to completely regrow hair over the span of 8 months.


 

DEBBIE LERMAN: That's what a lockdown until . . . and it's not lockdown until vaccine; it's lockdown until countermeasures.

So the civilian framework of Public Health disappeared.  It just got swallowed up by the biodefense framework, and now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world, which is utterly and completely counter to medicine and science in public health.  --Debbie Lerman

The biodefense global public partnership includes all of the public health agencies and stuff on a national level, but they're not the ones who are in charge.  So they're the ones who are just enacting the policy, and that's where everybody has to be really, really clear.  Fauci was not in charge.  Please get that out of your mind.  Yes, we can prosecute him.  Yes, we can blame him for a lot of things.  He didn't make the policy.  He didn't come up with the policy, and he didn't enforce the policy.  He was the public relations face of the policy.  Sure, he's a terrible person.  I would be happy if he were on trial, but I don't think that's where we should be focusing all of our attention.

00:45.  And that's why they brought in Birx.

00:48.  Yes, so Debra Birx is representative of the National Security State.  So what happens . . . so that's why I'm saying, so the second tier is the public health agencies, but what I discovered through my research is that the government entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council.  The National Security Council now again I have to emphasize that before COVID, I didn't want to know this.  I didn't ever want to know about National Security, FBI, CIA, . . . yeah, it's not my thing and so I just went where my research took me and unfortunately that's where it took me, and so I had to go there.  And so the National Security Council is defined as "the leaders of the military and intelligence arms of government that are advising the president on National Security."  That's the definition.  Now, that was the definition before COVID.  They changed it.  So you have to look up the Way Back Machine to find that definition.  Now the way they define it is, yes, it's the intelligence and military, but, of course, it's also pandemics, disasters, anything that requires national coordination now is going to be coordinated through the National Security Council.  That's scary because they have expanded the definition of what the National Security Council is supposed to do and in doing that they've incorporated Public Health into what they call Biosecurity, a biosecurity framework.  A biosecurity framework, the one that they came up with, is based on a biodefense response to outbreaks, which is lockdown until vaccine.  And what that was supposed to be for, it was supposed to be for when there was an Anthrax attack let's say on a subway system in a big city, you could lockdown that city, make sure that it didn't get, it didn't spread further getting brush treatment to the people in the affected area.  It would be a very limited geographic and temporal event.  That's what a lockdown until . . . and it's not lockdown until vaccine; it's lockdown until countermeasures.  So they would rush the counter measures.  They had EUA, which is Emergency Use Authorization, which in that situation was important because you rush the treatment to the people in that area even if you don't know that it's definitely going to to be effective; it's such a big emergency biowarfare, bio terrorism, you got to rush it to the people.  There might be some collateral damage.  We're in a military situation here, right, so in a military situation collateral damage is a whole different consideration than in a civilian framework of Public Health.  So the civilian framework of Public Health disappeared.  It just got swallowed up by the biodefense framework, and now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world, which is utterly and completely counter to medicine and science in public health

PAUL SALADINO, MD: How much protein should you eat per day? 1 gram of protein per pound of body weight

Thursday, April 17, 2025

KEVIN MCKERNAN: It’s amazing what a little liability can do to hold companies accountable

DR. WILLIAM DAVIS: SMALL LDL PARTICLES, THE REAL CAUSE OF HEART DISEASE

So when you put a piece of bread, bagel, or pancake in your mouth the enzymes in your saliva the amylase in your saliva begins to digest it immediately and that's why you get tooth decay from eating seeds and grains because the Amylopectin A is converted to sugars immediately upon putting it in your mouth . . .  --Dr. William Davis


TRUTH IN HEALTH

I will often hear this comment, "I can eat bread, sandwiches, bagels, donuts, whatever, made of wheat, because I don't have a gluten allergy or sensitivity."

Let's think about that for a moment.  So gluten is indeed a problem for many people, of course, for people with celiac disease, and perhaps gluten sensitivity is largely due to the gliadin protein, which makes up 70% of gluten.  And so gluten has two kinds of protein.  It's gluten that confers its stretchability, makes it a dough to make pizza crust and other things like that, but it's also the gliadin in protein.  That's the source of most of the problems.  It's the gliadin protein, for instance, that is partially degraded because we don't have the enzymes to fully breakdown the gliadin protein sequences, the amino acid sequences, so it forms gliadin derived opioid peptides, and I mean that literally, opioid peptides, because they cross into the brain and they stimulate appetite.  Put aside gluten sensitivity, gliadin is an important and very potent appetite stimulant.  We also know with good evidence that the gliadin protein is also the initiating factor in numerous, if not most, autoimmune diseases, like rheumatoid arthritis and type 1 diabetes.  Gliadin is also a source of inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract.  So just that alone, you think would be enough to turn people off to wheat, that is, the initiation of auto- immune diseases, gliadin derived opioid peptide appetite stimulants and gastrointestinal inflammation but there are other factors in wheat that's what if you say I'm not sensitive to gluten well you really are even though you don't perceive it that way but there are other problems in wheat and related grains I say related grains because grasses that's what we in grains are they are seeds of grasses and humans are just not equipped to digest the components of grasses humans are species homo sapiens we don't have the digestive equipment to break down components of grasses especially the seeds of grasses whether it's wheat or barley or rye or oats or triticale or millet, we don't have, we simply can't digest components of seeds of grasses.

2:30.  What is there besides gluten?  There is also amylopectin A.  Amylopectin A is a carbohydrate unique to wheat and grains.  It's different than other amylopectins, like the Amylopectin C, for instance, of legumes.  Amylopectin A has a structure that makes it uniquely susceptible to digestion by the ubiquitous enzyme amylase in your saliva and in your stomach.  While many components of wheat and grains are indigestible or only partially digestible, amylopectin A is the exception.  It is highly digestible.  So when you put a piece of bread, bagel, or pancake in your mouth the enzymes in your saliva the amylase in your saliva begins to digest it immediately and that's why you get tooth decay from eating seeds and grains because the Amylopectin A is converted to sugars immediately upon putting it in your mouth, and then, of course, even further when you digest it and swallow it and it goes to your stomach.  That's why wheat raises blood glucose blood sugar higher than nearly all other Foods very few foods raise blood glucose higher than wheat wheat raises blood sugar higher than honey or table sugar or candy because that amylopectin a is uniquely susceptible people ignore that fact all you need to do to prove this is look at any table of glycemic indexes in any Dietary Reference and you'll see that among the highest of all glycemic indexes how high blood glucose is after you consume wheat but the highest is whole wheat, even higher, by the way, than white flour oddly.  So amylopectin a raises blood glucose extravagantly is it any wonder that in a world where we are told to cut your saturated fat total fat and eat more healthy whole grains and everything in moderation that we have a world of obesity and type 2 diabetes no wonder we were told by dietary guidelines, dietitians, doctors to eat this food that raises blood glucose sky high repeatedly.  

SMALL LDL PARTICLES, THE REAL CAUSE OF HEART DISEASE

4:40.  Now that same phenomenon of consuming Amylopectin A from wheat and grains also triggers the formation of small LDL particles.  That's the real cause of heart disease.  There are many causes of heart disease but one of the main driving causes is small LDL particles, not this indirect crude surrogate LDL cholesterol.  It's really small LDL particles.  Where do small LDL particles come from?  Well, it's easy the science is quite well sorted out; it's been sorted out for over 40 years.  But this advice does not make money for the pharmaceutical or the healthcare industry so no one bothers to tell you this even though the science is more than ample to tell you that wheat grains and sugars are the only things that cause the formation of small LDL particles and lead to heart disease, not saturated fat, not bacon, not pork fat, not olive oil, none of those things.  Only wheat, grains, and sugars, and that's because of the Amylopectin A unique to grains as well as sugars, like sucrose.  How does that happen?  Well, the liver, your liver is very good at converting sugars, like Amylopectin A, to triglycerides.  So a carbohydrate to a fat.  Triglycerides are fats. And that's called hepatic or liver de novo lipogenesis.  All that means is liver is making new fats.  That's all it means.  So your liver is very good, very efficient at converting sugars and carbohydrates to triglycerides, fats, and hepatic de novo epigenesis.  While the liver releases those triglycerides into the bloodstream, but triglycerides can't float freely in the bloodstream because if they did, they would coalesce and they would infarct or block arteries in your body, and you would die.  Like salad dressing, the oil and vinegar separate, right, the oil separates from the vinegar, from the aqueous solution.  Same thing happens in the bloodstream; you can't have fats floating freely or else they will coalesce, like your salad dressing.  So the liver packages those triglycerides into an aqueous soluble particle, called very low-density lipoproteins, called VLDL.  It's low density because it's full of triglycerides.  So in that salad dressing, what floats on top, the fats, the oils do, right, because they're lower in density.  The aqueous solution with water and vinegar is at the bottom, the high density. So the liver packages those fats, triglycerides, into VLDL particles, low-density particles that then enter the bloodstream.  Now, VLDL particles are themselves a direct cause for coronary disease and atherosclerosis that is adds to atherosclerotic plaque in your coronary arteries, heart attack, sudden cardiac death, all of that stuff.  But VLDL particles also interact with LDL particles, and when they encounter an LDL particle, they transfer some of those triglycerides to the LDL particle, and there is a series of enzymatic, so-called "remodeling reactions" that create the small LDL particle.  And LDL particles are unusually able to enter the walls of arteries, simulate inflammation, they are more prone to oxidation and glycation, which makes them much more harmful.  They also persist in the bloodstream for 5 to 7 days, as compared to the 24 hours, one day, of large LDL particles provoked by fat consumption.  So small LDL particles

Wednesday, April 16, 2025

IVERMECTIN FROM INDIA

DR. SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: Dr. Paul Offit claims that an infant can tolerate up to 10,000 or 100,000 vaccines all at once

Who is Dr. Paul Offit

Offit is a member of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee; a board member of Every Child By Two; a founding board member of the Autism Science Foundation (ASF);  and a former member of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

Tuesday, April 15, 2025

KEVIN KILEY: Out of 7,000 homes damaged in the fires, LA has issued exactly 4 permits to rebuild. The victims are being punished all over again for the city and state's catastrophic incompetence

WAY TOO KIND, DAVE

Monday, April 14, 2025

The origin of vitamins and how they are made

DR. SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: Measles has been used for years in fighting cancer?

Here is the article, "Measles Virus as an Oncolytic Immunotherapy," Christine E. Engeland and Guy Ungerechts, Cancers (Basel), February 1, 2021

Incredible.  

Measles virus is currently under investigation as an innovative cancer treatment. The virus selectively replicates in and kills cancer cells. Furthermore, it can be genetically engineered to increase tumor specificity and therapeutic efficacy. Importantly, treatment with measles virus activates antitumor immune responses. A number of clinical trials using measles virus for cancer treatment have been completed or are ongoing. Future studies will further harness the possibilities of virus engineering and potential of combination immunotherapies to improve clinical outcome.

CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS: If you want to do a land grab, having a recession lowers your prices

ROD D. MARTIN: President Trump just militarized the “Roosevelt Reservation” along the US border in CA, AZ, and NM

Hard to know what this means, but any institution can repurpose any event, any installation, any monument. 

BRETT PIKE: The [1934 American Historical Association] report was used to pivot away from prioritizing traditional American values be taught in school. Instead, promoting collectivism over individualism, and globalism over nationalism.

American Historical Association, 1934.  

How long has the American education system been dumbing us down? Well in 1934 the American Historical Association released a report funded by the Carnegie Corporation.… The report was used to pivot away from prioritizing traditional American values be taught in school. Instead, promoting collectivism over individualism, and globalism over nationalism. There is a reason 3.7 million people are homeschooling.