— J Michael Waller (@JMichaelWaller) December 25, 2025
Showing posts with label 2025. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2025. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 24, 2025
US beef production is as elite as it gets. It produces 18% of the world’s beef with only 6% of the world’s cattle.
— Cary Kelly (@CaryKelly11) December 24, 2025
It also has the lowest emissions per pound of beef produced!
American ranchers are a national treasure. pic.twitter.com/rf4iJ7fgM0
Do you know that the US is the world's leader in beef production efficiency? It produces 18% of the world's beef with only 6% of the world's cattle. In fact, compared to other countries, it takes them 2 and a half or more beef cattle to produce the same amount of beef as one US beef animal. And the US produces over $27 billion pounds of beef a year and has the lowest emission intensity per pound of beef produced. There's your AG fact for the day.
ERIC DAUGHERTY: 🚨 HOLY CRAP! New reports allege up to $76.5 BILLION OR MORE in fraudulent spending in California
🚨 HOLY CRAP! New reports allege up to $76.5 BILLION OR MORE in fraudulent spending in California
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) December 24, 2025
This makes Minnesota look like CHILD'S PLAY...and more is going to come out
Rep. Kiley is confirming Slithering Gavin Newsom's California is the "fraud capital of America"
"This… pic.twitter.com/7TjxGmSzRg
— Val (@ValZimmer2) : John Enders talks about his viral isolation experiment and control studies. Breakdown of the cell produces cellular debris. The different cellular debris produces different symptoms
— Val (@ValZimmer2) December 24, 2025
Okay, so diseases are not a function of viruses or bacteria, but a function of the breakdown of a cell. Breakdown of a cell can be seen to be similar or identical in terms of symptoms, like Measles symptoms, for example. So what cells break down under measles? Or what cells break down under scarlet fever to produce those symptoms which are different from chicken pox, different from Gonorrhea, and so forth?
In our award-winning* series "Back to BS", we trace the roots of today's pseudoscience called virology all the way back to its source: John F Enders.
— EXiT the Germ Theory Prison #novirus (@ExitEUbefree) November 17, 2021
Fun fact: he was the only one in Enders-style virology who conducted a control experiment.
He was quite open about the deceit: pic.twitter.com/Swiq77h6MX
SIGHTBRINGER: For 40 years, the Fed’s real power has not been rates. It has been legitimacy. Trump is tearing that membrane.
This is Trump rejecting the idea that unelected institutions should be allowed to suppress national growth to preserve theoretical stability. He is choosing volatility over stagnation. Momentum over control. Power over process. That path creates booms.It also creates fractures. --SIGHTBRINGER
Translation: Screw London and the whole central bank model.
— Tom Luongo (Head Sneetch) (@TFL1728) December 24, 2025
Libertarians should rejoice but they are too stupid to actually read anyone else's book but their own. https://t.co/ikOVQ3qnQv
What you are seeing is a direct assault on the post-Volcker monetary regime.
And it is intentional.
This is a signal.
Here is the structure underneath it.
1. Trump is openly breaking the Fed’s myth of neutrality
For forty years, the Fed’s real power has not been rates.
It has been legitimacy.
The belief that:
• monetary policy is technocratic
• markets are managed by experts
• politics stops at the Fed door
Trump is tearing that membrane.
By saying “anyone who disagrees with me will never be Fed Chair,” he is doing something far more disruptive than threatening independence.
He is declaring that the Fed is already political.
He is just willing to say it out loud.
Once that happens, the spell is broken.
2. He is reframing markets as a political instrument, not a natural force
Trump’s core claim is simple.
Markets are behaviorally managed systems.
They respond to incentives.
They respond to fear.
They respond to rate expectations.
When good economic data causes markets to sell off, it reveals something rotten in the system.
That rot is rate repression logic:
• growth triggers tightening
• success gets punished
• expansion is capped preemptively
Trump is rejecting that logic entirely.
He wants markets rewarded for strength.
He wants inflation managed after growth, not before it.
He wants risk-taking restored as a national objective.
This is a return to explicit growth primacy.
3. This is a regime shift toward fiscal dominance, openly stated
The old model was:
• Fed first
• Treasury adapts
• markets price policy restraint
The new model Trump is pushing is:
• growth first
• markets absorb volatility
• Fed follows the political mandate
That is fiscal dominance without euphemism.
Rates become a tool.
Markets become a scoreboard.
GDP becomes the legitimacy engine.
This is how emerging powers behave.
Trump is attempting it inside a reserve currency system.
That is explosive.
4. The real target is time, not inflation
Trump is obsessed with one thing he never names directly.
Time.
High rates stretch time.
They delay investment.
They freeze projects.
They slow capital velocity.
Trump wants to compress time.
He wants projects funded now.
Markets moving now.
GDP compounding now.
This aligns perfectly with the broader acceleration era:
• AI compresses development cycles
• capital rotates faster
• political patience collapses
• long-term credibility matters less than short-term momentum
In that world, a central bank designed for slow decades becomes a liability.
5. This increases tail risk across every asset class
If Trump succeeds, here is what follows:
• higher inflation tolerance
• higher equity volatility
• steeper yield curves
• weaker long-end bond credibility
• stronger real assets
• capital flight into things the Fed cannot print
Gold.
Bitcoin.
Equities with pricing power.
Anything tied to growth velocity.
The Fed becomes reactive.
Markets become political.
Risk becomes explicit.
No more adult supervision theater.
The real truth:
This is Trump rejecting the idea that unelected institutions should be allowed to suppress national growth to preserve theoretical stability.
He is choosing volatility over stagnation.
Momentum over control.
Power over process.
That path creates booms.
It also creates fractures.
But once a country decides that growth is a political mandate rather than a monetary byproduct, there is no going back.
The system changes character.
And everyone holding “safe” assets needs to understand what that actually means now.
Tuesday, December 23, 2025
SCOTT ADAMS: Newsom’s task force wants to redistribute farms from white owners to non-white farmers. How much do you think the efficiency of the farms is going to decrease if you take the experienced farmers and block…
🚨South Africa-style land grabs are coming to California. Newsom’s task force wants to redistribute farms from white owners to non-white farmers @ScottAdamsSays "How much do you think the efficiency of the farms is going to decrease if you take the experienced farmers and block… pic.twitter.com/XjS88eF6DL
— jay plemons (@jayplemons) December 23, 2025
South Africa-style land grabs are coming to California. Newsom’s task force wants to redistribute farms from white owners to non-white farmers
"How much do you think the efficiency of the farms is going to decrease if you take the experienced farmers and block them from owning farms or decrease their impact on the farms... and move the farms to people who didn’t have as much experience.What is going to happen to the price of food? It only goes one way. Nobody doubts how that’s going to turn out."
DAVID SANTA CARLA: The elderly are showing signs of black fatigue.
The elderly are showing signs of Black Fatigue. pic.twitter.com/TfyLYpt7Qa
— David Santa Carla 🦇 (@TheOnlyDSC) December 23, 2025
DESMOND SHUM: METHODOLOGY [of influence]: GENTLENESS AS A WEAPON
Preferred targets sit in the middle—large enough to matter, small enough to stay below the radar. The Party does not want heroes. It wants conduits.Sociology Over Ideology
This is not a political influencer program. It is a social penetration strategy, distributing influence quietly through everyday trust networks. --Desmond Shum
Inside the Machine: A Rare Recording Reveals How the CCP Recruits Influencers youtu.be/rV7JFmz6Ca0?si A Chinese YouTuber with roughly 350,000 subscribers in the military-affairs space recently released a recording of a conversation with a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) recruiter. The audio offers a rare, unfiltered look into how China’s overseas influence campaigns actually operate. This is not the old model of “external propaganda”—no slogans, no red banners, no embassy tweets. What emerges instead is a market-driven influence operation built on a simple premise: credibility is scarce, and the Party is willing to pay for it. 1. WHO THE CCP RECRUITS AND WHY The recruiter describes a system that resembles risk-managed talent acquisition more than political vetting. The goal is influence that is useful, controllable, and durable. The Goldilocks Rule: Influence Without Exposure The CCP’s first rule is blunt: avoid obvious targets. High-profile dissident influencers—such as Wang Zhian (YouTube), Li Laoshi “Not Your Teacher” (X), Wen Zhao (YouTube), and Toronto Fanglian (YouTube)—are ruled out. Not because they criticize the CCP, but because they are already “tagged”: •too visible •too aggressively critical •too politically exposed •too difficult to manage Preferred targets sit in the middle—large enough to matter, small enough to stay below the radar. The Party does not want heroes. It wants conduits. Sociology Over Ideology The talent pool described is sociological rather than political: •Italy-based music influencers •Japan-based food YouTubers •Philadelphia-based blue-collar and car-mechanic creators This is not a political influencer program. It is a social penetration strategy, distributing influence quietly through everyday trust networks. The Party does not need admiration. It seeks to gently steer opinion. 2. METHODOLOGY: GENTLENESS AS A WEAPON Invisible, Long-Term Discipline The guiding principle is low-visibility persistence—“æ¶¦ç‰©ç»†æ— å£°” gentle rain moist everything, not sudden impact: •no abrupt tonal shifts •no one-off campaigns •no visible coordination The objective is endurance. Limited Criticism, Strategic Assistance •minor criticism of the Party is allowed •policy complaints are acceptable •one red line is absolute: no direct attacks on Xi Jinping Controlled dissent builds credibility. Excess dissent disqualifies. In the platform era, influence must be indistinguishable from independent commentary. 3. MONEY—AND THE UNSPOKEN INCENTIVE The financial structure is explicit: €40,000 per month, with a 30 percent cut for the recruiter. Money is only half the leverage. The recruiter also hints at reduced harassment of family members inside China—being “on the list rather than outside it.” He insists this is not a threat. It simply describes the environment. In such a system, cooperation functions like an insurance premium—paid quietly. 4. THE MODERN CCP INFLUENCE MODEL One line captures the logic: “The Party-state looks at the numbers.” Not belief. Not loyalty. Metrics. Views. Reach. Narratives that travel without fingerprints. Traditional propaganda is abandoned because it is too obvious. The modern preference is for ambiguity, credible messengers, cultural entry points, and erosion rather than persuasion. The goal is not conversion. It is drift. CONCLUSIONCCP social media strategy abroad: sociology without ideology, gentleness is a weapon, and more. Plus money. https://t.co/jtNlRU2rEE
— J Michael Waller (@JMichaelWaller) December 22, 2025
What makes this transcript unsettling is not its brazenness, but its restraint. The CCP is not trying to win arguments outright. It is content to let doubt accumulate and confidence erode, allowing “neutrality” to do the work slogans once failed to accomplish. Influence here is not about persuasion—it is about drift. And drift, over time, is far harder to see, let alone stop.
VIKTOR ORBAN: We have to trust that the people will enforce peace from the bottom up. This is the only thing we can trust.
It's nothing new. @ArmstrongEcon and I have been saying this for years. Good for @PM_ViktorOrban to finally say it out loud as he pulls Hungary and the rest of Eastern Europe away from the brink. https://t.co/QEqT5Rg0FQ
— Tom Luongo (Head Sneetch) (@TFL1728) December 23, 2025
00:00. Who has wanted war so far? Some European politicians have wanted war, thinking that a country with nuclear weapons can be defeated through a conventional war. Good luck with that. Also, those who manufacture weapons always want war or some kind of armed conflict. These are the arms manufacturers. And now a 3rd group has appeared: Now the bankers also want you to continue, because, otherwise, how will they get their money back? They can only recover their money if Russia is defeated militarily. That is how it all comes together. So I want to tell everyone not to trust that European politicians are sensible enough not to drag us into a war. They are not sensible enough for that. The only ones you can trust are the European people. You can trust the people in Szeged, in Hungary, in Slovakia, in Croatia, in Italy. We have to trust the people who will hold similar gatherings. Let's not be mistaken: so far, this is only happening in Hungary. In 6 months, there will also be large anti-war gatherings in Germany and in France. We have to trust that the people will enforce peace from the bottom up. This is the only thing we can trust.
STEVE GRUBER: Chuck Schumer, the author of this bill that made what we're doing with Venezuela drug boats fully legal. We don't need permission from the rest of the world. Chuck Schumer gave us that in 1986.
Remember when…. https://t.co/7XXGvS3zmY
— John Guandolo (@JGuandolo54271) December 23, 2025
from Steve Gruber,
1:17. The Democrats are on the wrong side. There's John Fetterman, the only honest Democrat. I can't believe we're sitting here having that conversation. John Fetterman, the guy who . . . look, I was not a fan. I thought he was compromised. He had the stroke. He couldn't speak right. He turns out to be the one guy you can count on from the Democrats to at least be honest. Now, he's a Democrat but he'll tell you the truth. He went into that classified intelligence briefing and came out, unlike other Democrats, and told the truth about what he had seen, why is legal . . . Oh, and by the way, right here, this in front of me, this is the Maritime Drug Laws Enforcement Act of 1986, authored by a member of Congress in 1986 from the state of New York. His name: Chuck Schumer. He wrote the law that passed almost unanimously that makes it legal to blow drug boats out of the water. It happened in the 80s a lot, 90s a lot. Go ahead, look it up, folks, Chuck Schumer, the author of this bill that made what we're doing with Venezuela drug boats fully legal. We don't need permission from the rest of the world. Chuck Schumer gave us that in 1986.
Obliterate Islam https://t.co/oVSWGPIGou
— John Guandolo (@JGuandolo54271) December 23, 2025
from Bill Warner @ Political Islam.
00:00. Whenever you're dealing with an apologist for Islam or even a Muslim, when you bring up Jihad, almost immediately they kick back to you,
Well, what about those terrible Crusades? Why they're the moral justification for Jihad. I mean we're just as bad as they are, so let's not talk about Jihad, okay? Let's talk about the Crusades.
Well, what we'd like to talk about here are facts and it turns out I sat down and put together some work and I created a database of some 548 battles that Islam fought Jihad, battles against classical civilization. This isn't even all the battles Africa civilization of Rome and Greece
Monday, December 22, 2025
WALL STREET APES: How hard could ICE be cracking down in California if one single Walmart has 10 tents for illegal vendors right in the open….. It’s worse than Mexico.
This is so crazy
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) December 23, 2025
American in California drives by a Walmart
I counted, there are 10 tents set up for illegal food vendors
How hard could ICE be cracking down in California if one single Walmart has 10 tents for illegal vendors right in the open….. It’s worse than Mexico pic.twitter.com/WcwWRhA9KI
ASHLEY RINDSBERG: also true with Al Jazeera, which is a Qatari-controlled outlet considered to be generally reliable. That gives it a higher ranking in the reliability rating than many American conservative news outlets which have proper editorial structure and accountability.
Coordinated groups now edit Wikipedia to spread propaganda.
— John Stossel (@JohnStossel) December 21, 2025
For example, 40 Pro-Hamas editors: “Made 1 million edits to 10,000 articles,” says @NPOVmedia‘s @ashleyrindsberg. “They’re removing mentions of terror attacks." pic.twitter.com/g1d0FarGfS
3:29. Wikipedia has definitely been taken over by woke activists.
Why would they lean left?
Academic by Nature when you take something academic minded, and Wikipedia editors are very academic minded, they're naturally going to draw from that pool of academia, which is left-leaning.
3:45. People on the right are more likely to earn their living building things, or farming, fishing, serving in police and military organizations. People on the left are more likely to be academics, reporters, lawyers, people who write for a living. That gives them an advantage competing on Wikipedia.
4:05. The real barrier is to understand all the parliamentarian maneuvering, all the rules, lawyering, all this kind of stuff that really takes years to understand it, to win a single debate about a single sentence.
4:20. In addition, Wikipedia has simply declared most conservative media generally unreliable. That means editor should not cite Fox News, The Federalist, The Daily Wire, the New York Post. By contrast, Wikipedia not only calls CNN reliable, it deems MSNBC, Vox, Slate, The Nation, and Mother Jones, reliable. If you're a leftist that's what you think.
4:47. They consider FOX in their bones to be unreliable, never to be used on a variety of important topics.
4:54. And FOX is unreliable sometimes, but so is MSNBC and CNN.
5:00. And the New York Times, and any other rated reliable website or news outlet that it's listed.
5:06. However, . . .
MSNBC, The Nation, or Mother Jones, however far left you go, it's still going to be considered generally reliable. This is also true with Al Jazeera, which is a Qatari-controlled outlet considered to be generally reliable. That gives it a higher ranking in the reliability rating than many American conservative news outlets which have proper editorial structure and accountability.
5:32. Wikipedia's bias is also revealed in their choice of subjects. After the murder of this Ukrainian refugee.
A grizzly stabbing in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Wikipedia editors wanted this article about her deleted.
An editor has nominated this article for deletion. . . . arguing that the topic, may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline.
5:51. Erase this story, because this story was a story about race, about who gets to be acknowledged as a victim. This was a white woman killed, murdered by a black man, and Wikipedia very quickly tried to delete that article saying it wasn't notable.
6:06. This is just one murder.
6:08. But when you look at other instances of single crimes or crimes that end up in the news cycle, they do stay on Wikipedia and there's not an effort to delete them.
6:18. Also although the killer had been arrested 14 times.
6:22. Wikipedia wouldn't allow him to be named on the website. They said we have to protect his identity, because he's a suspect. He's not been convicted. Fair enough. The problem is when you look at another case on the right,
A 17-year-old from a neighboring state is now under arrest tonight accused of firing on demonstrators.
Kyle Rittenhouse who was a minor. They named him dozens of times.
6:45. And Rittenhouse has never been convicted.
6:48. But Wikipedia had no problem putting his name out there for the world.
6:51. And people point out the unfairness and inconsistency but nothing changes.
6:56. There is a point where public pressure and the culture actually does sway Wikipedia. Iryna Zarutska is a good example because there was an outcry about this and eventually Wikipedia did allow that article to stay, but on a whole, you're absolutely right. Nothing changes.
7:13. Another example of Wikipedia bias from the Israel-Palestine conflict. You say pro-Hamas editors push propaganda.
7:22. 40 or so editors who I call the "Gang of 40," they've made 1 million edits to 10,000 articles. [Ashley Rindsberg, Chief Investigative Officer, Neutral pov.com.] They're removing mentions of terror attacks by Hezbollah and Hamas. This is a systematic coordinated effort.
7:36. Right before the presidential election, Wikipedia created a page called "Donald Trump and fascism."
7:42. It's not if that is not an election interference, I'm not sure what is.
7:46. The Guardian, the left-wing newspaper, in the same day published the same thing, "Is Donald Trump a fascist?" September 21, 2024.
7:50. And they cited heavily a Harvard scholar who has ties to an Obama appointee but you as a user of Wikipedia will never see all this chain of sourcing. You just see the final product. They called him first a fascist,
Trump and his allies . . . have been compared to previous fascist leaders . . .
and then they sort of evolved the messaging to call him an authoritarian.
8:17. But isn't that fair?
8:19. The problem is that on Wikipedia you only get one side of it the worldview presented doesn't allow for other perspectives to be included and what you're reading about some of the most important topics of today.
8:29. If you look up Fidel Castro's successor, who repressed Cuba for years, you don't get authoritarian.
8:35. Not one mention of the term authoritarian on Raul Castro there's not one mention of the word authoritarian on the entry for Ayatollah Khomeini. At least on the leader of China's page Wikipedia some foreign diplomats consider him to be an authoritative
J. MICHAEL WALLER: The founder of the Pentagon's Muslim chaplain program was Abdurahman Alamoudi, later convicted as a terrorism financier. Alamoudi also founded the American Muslim Armed Forces & Veterans Affairs Council (AMAFVAC) to endorse Islamic chaplains for the US military & Dept of Veterans Affairs.
Great to see @SecWar starting to fix the military chaplains.
— J Michael Waller (@JMichaelWaller) December 22, 2025
Now, the Pentagon must de-recognize Muslim Brotherhood fronts and affiliates like Islamic Society of North America & AMAFVAC that screen and approve Muslim chaplains, and boot the chaplains they endorsed. https://t.co/bYzdPd7DnB
UNSPEAKABLE
This keeps happening to innocent people https://t.co/jeuBtqwSBV
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 22, 2025
So Fale Vaigalepa Pea, 42, is not crazy. He was simply measuring risk. "I'll take my chances in jail"?
His weapon.
Jeanette Marken, 75, was on her way to pick up a food order. The police knew of Fale Vaigalepa Pea; in fact, they were cavalier about his record, "Oh, yeah, we know him." 
The people funding fake “criminal justice reforms” that result in severe harm or death of innocent people need to be held accountable!
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 23, 2025
Name them and shame them. https://t.co/zL3wlLkR1J
BILL FEDERER: And people forget, Egypt was completely Christian for six centuries. It's not anymore. All of North Africa was completely Christian for six centuries. It's not anymore.
Listen to Historian Bill Federer
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) December 22, 2025
“They say that by 2030, there will be a majority Muslim population in Europe, and they'll just flat out vote in Sharia law. It won't just be no go zones where they take over entire neighborhoods in Paris or around Belgium and London. No, they'll… pic.twitter.com/69ERynhdmn
Listen to Historian Bill Federer “They say that by 2030, there will be a majority Muslim population in Europe, and they'll just flat out vote in Sharia law. It won't just be no go zones where they take over entire neighborhoods in Paris or around Belgium and London. No, they'll take over entire cities. And people forget, Egypt was completely Christian for six centuries. It's not anymore. All of North Africa was completely Christian for six centuries. It's not anymore. All of Turkey, all seven churches as mentioned in the book of Revelation, were all in Turkey. And they were all taken over by the Muslim Turks. Constantinople was the largest Christian city in the world, and the largest Christian church in the world for hundreds of years was the Hagia Sophia. And it got turned into a mosque. And so they want to do the same thing with the Vatican. And recently they allowed Muslim prayers in the Vatican. So we see that it's headed in that direction.“
Sunday, December 21, 2025
ABMC: In accordance with his wishes, four-star Gen. George S. Patton Jr. was buried with his men at Luxembourg American Cemetery. His grave site is carefully maintained by ABMC staff who carries the same maintenance routine every Friday morning.
In accordance with his wishes, four-star Gen. George S. Patton Jr. was buried with his men at Luxembourg American Cemetery.
— ABMC (@usabmc) December 20, 2025
His grave site is carefully maintained by ABMC staff who carries the same maintenance routine every Friday morning.
They pay attention to details and… pic.twitter.com/mUOouYMG1g
ABMC, American Battle Monuments Commission.
1938 film of a German Christmas
Happy Christmas to you all
— PhilosophiCat (@Philosophi_Cat) December 21, 2025
This little 1938 film of a German Christmas is one that I found very moving. Christmas was simple, but beautiful and rich with meaning. In each scene, you see the traditions that bind generations together and make time feel qualified. It makes modern… pic.twitter.com/dinknPA2A2
SASHA LATYPOVA: short video summary of my written expert testimony submitted to the Dutch court in the case against perpetrators of Project COVID and the Great Reset agenda
This is the short video summary of my written expert testimony submitted the Dutch court in the case against the perpetrators of Project Covid and the Great Reset agenda: https://t.co/sCv5obCVlS
— sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" (@sasha_latypova) December 21, 2025
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)