Showing posts with label 2025. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2025. Show all posts

Friday, November 28, 2025

HUH. I ALWAYS THOUGHT THESE GUYS WERE UNTOUCHABLES

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

SECRETARY OF WAR, PETE SEGHETH THANKS, HONORS, & SERVES SOLDIERS ON THE USS GERALD R. FORD

Definitely an anti-Obama moment. 

Words from our first Commander-in-Chief, our first president, first in war, first in peace, first in the mind and heart of all countrymen, of course George Washington.  And he was the first to proclaim Thanksgiving, and he put out a Thanksgiving Proclamation.  And in that Proclamation, he wrote this in 1789,

Whereas it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the Providence of almighty God, to obey his will, to be grateful for his benefits and humbly to implore his protection and favor.  

So to almighty God, we pray today this Thanksgiving, implore your protection and favor upon this crew, upon this ship, upon this battle group, and all men and women deployed around our hemisphere and the world, Godspeed.  God bless.  You are in our prayers and we are grateful.

Sec. War.  Out 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump FULLY NULLIFIES ALL AUTOPEN documents "signed" by Joe Biden - 92% of them.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

TED KENNEDY, 1965: Contrary to the charges in some quarters, the Bill will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area or the most populated and economically deprived nations.

America living under the ghost of Ted Kennedy. 

So in 1965, they passed an Act that switched America's immigration from majority European to majority Hispanic from Mexico.  Within just 50 years, America went from around 90% white of European descent to 60%.  And even if we stop immigration completely, right now, by 2045, European Americans will still become the absolute minority in America.  The Left realized that foreign-born Hispanics vote around 80% for the Left.  So they started a campaign to call the immigration policy we had pre-1965 "racist" and "discriminatory."  

There was a feeling in Congress that that same notion of ending discrimination should also be applied to US immigration policy up until 1965 US immigration policy was heavily biased in favor of Europeans.

Senator Ted Kennedy who played a major role in helping pass the 1965 Immigration Act promised in a speech that, "the passing of this bill won't change America or cause Americans to lose their jobs."  

He said in the Floor speech, 1965,

Out of deference to the critics, I want to comment on what the bill will not do. First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually.  Under the proposed Bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same.  Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset.  Contrary to the charges in some quarters, the Bill will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area or the most populated and economically deprived nations.  In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as some critics seem to think.  Thirdly, the bill will not permit the entry of subversive persons, criminals, illiterates, or those with contagious disease or serious mental illness.  As I noted moments ago, no immigrant visa will be issued to a person who is likely to become a public charge.  

Every single thing that Ted Kennedy promised would not happen in the passage of the 1965 Hart-Celler Act did, in fact, happen.  We were, in fact, flooded with a million immigrants annually. The ethnic mix of this country was upset.  America is, in fact, being inundated with immigrants every single year from one particular country, mostly that being Mexico.  And we are, in fact, accepting immigrants from economically deprived nations, such as Africa, Asia, Mexico, El Salvador, Haiti. And when he promised along with others that the Bill would not permit the entry of subversive persons, criminals, illiterates, or those with contagious diseases, obviously, that was a lie as well . . . especially the subversive persons.

By the way, Ted Kennedy also had Reagan's back in 1986, 

1986: “This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this.” 

1963 is beginning to make a little more sense.  

________________________________________________

Rush Limbaugh presents Ben Johnson's critique on "The 1965 Immigration Act: Anatomy of a Disaster," Ben Johnson, 2002. 

America's current mass immigration mess is the result of a change in the laws in 1965. Prior to 1965, despite some changes in the 50's, America was a low-immigration country basically living under immigration laws written in 1924. Thanks to low immigration, the swamp of cheap labor was largely drained during this period, America became a fundamentally middle-class society, and our many European ethnic groups were brought together into a common national culture. In some ways, this achievement was so complete that we started to take for granted what we had achieved and forgot why it happened. So in a spasm of sentimentality on the Right and lies on the Left, we opened the borders.

Born of liberal ideology, the 1965 bill abolished the national origins quota system that had regulated the ethnic composition of immigration in fair proportion to each group's existing presence in the population. In a misguided application spirit of the civil rights era, the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations saw these ethnic quotas as an archaic form of chauvinism. Moreover, as Cold Warriors facing charges of "racism" and "imperialism," they found the system rhetorically embarrassing. The record of debate over this seismic change in immigration policy reveals that left-wingers, in their visceral flight to attack "discrimination," did not reveal the consequences of their convictions. Instead, their spokesmen set out to assuage concerned traditionalists with a litany of lies and wishful thinking. 

Chief among national concerns was total numeric immigration. Senate floor manager and Camelot knight-errant Ted Kennedy, D-Massachusetts, assured jittery senators that “our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually.” Senator Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, further calmed that august body, insisting “the total number of potential immigrants would not be changed very much.” Time has proven otherwise. Average immigration levels before the 1965 amendments took effect hovered around 300,000 per annum. Yet 1,045,000 legal immigrants flooded our cities in 1996 alone.


Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Thursday, November 27, 2025

The Largest Economies in the World from 1700 to 2025

Thank you to J. Michael Waller for this terrific interactive chart. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

SAMA HOOLE: We're 10,000 years in and still living with the consequences [of Agriculture]. Your crowded teeth: Agricultural nutrition deficiency. Your chronic disease: Agricultural diet mismatch. Your 40-hour work week: Agricultural labor inheritance

Here's why agriculture was a disastrous trade deal for humanity: What we gained: - Population can grow 10x - Food supply more predictable (when crops don't fail) - Ability to support specialists (potters, weavers, priests, soldiers) - Foundation for "civilisation" What we lost: - 6 inches of height - Robust bone density - Perfect teeth - Freedom from chronic disease - Freedom from epidemic disease - 20+ hours per week of leisure time - Political freedom and autonomy - Nutritional quality - Social equality The trade: Support more people by making each person worse off. This only makes sense if you value population growth over individual wellbeing. And we didn't consciously choose it. We stumbled into it by eliminating megafauna, then couldn't reverse it because population had grown beyond hunting capacity.


We're 10,000 years in and still living with the consequences: - Your crowded teeth: Agricultural nutrition deficiency - Your chronic disease: Agricultural diet mismatch - Your 40-hour work week: Agricultural labor inheritance - Your social hierarchy: Agricultural inequality structure - Your government: Agricultural coercion system Every problem of modern civilisation traces back to this: We're agriculturalists trying to thrive on a system our bodies aren't designed for. We haven't evolved to digest grains well in 10,000 years. We won't evolve to do so in the next 10,000 either. The devil's bargain was made by our ancestors. We're still paying the price. And wondering why we're so sick.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,
You've heard the testimony by Mayorkas.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

SAMA HOOLE: [Dr. Jan Kwasniewski, Polish physician]'s protocol was simple: "Eat fat. Lots of it. Minimal protein. No carbs." He recommended foods by fat content. Pork fat was ideal. Lean meat was inadequate.

Dr. Jan Kwasniewski, Polish physician, developed his "Optimal Diet" in the 1970s. Extreme by any standard: 3:1 fat to protein ratio. Almost zero carbs. He called it "Optimal" because he'd tested it on thousands of patients. Results: - Obesity reversed - Type 2 diabetes resolved - Digestive diseases improved - Autoimmune conditions reduced - Energy dramatically increased His protocol was simple: "Eat fat. Lots of it. Minimal protein. No carbs." He recommended foods by fat content. Pork fat was ideal. Lean meat was inadequate. The Polish medical establishment called him dangerous. Heretical. "You can't tell people to eat mostly fat! They'll die!" Except his patients didn't die. They got healthier. He practiced for 40 years. Published books (in Polish, rarely translated). Treated over 50,000 patients. Documented their outcomes meticulously. Outside Poland, nobody knew about him until the 2000s when his work was translated. By then, low-fat had been the standard for 30 years. His extreme high-fat approach was considered pseudoscience. He died in 2004. His clinical success dismissed as "not evidence-based." 50,000 successfully treated patients apparently didn't count as evidence. He was right. We just weren't ready to hear it.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

SAMA HOOLE: Amundsen ate like people who'd lived in extreme cold for millennia. Prioritised fat. Survived. Scott ate like the Royal Navy recommended. Proper balanced nutrition. Died.

1911: Norwegian explorer Roald Amundsen prepares to race to the South Pole. His strategy: Study the Inuit. Copy everything they do. Diet: Seal blubber, fatty meat, fish. Feed lean cuts to the dogs. Prioritise fat. British explorer Robert Scott prepares simultaneously. His strategy: British naval traditions. Science. Civilisation. Diet: Proper naval rations. Lean meat, biscuits, tea. Feed fatty meat to dogs because fat is inferior. December 1911: Amundsen reaches South Pole first. Plants Norwegian flag. Returns safely. All men survive. Dogs survive. Everyone in good health. January 1912: Scott reaches pole one month later. Finds Norwegian flag. Begins return journey. March 1912: Scott and all men found dead. Frozen 11 miles from supply depot. Dogs dead. Evidence of severe malnutrition, scurvy, starvation. The difference wasn't courage. Both teams were brave. The difference wasn't equipment. Both had quality gear. The difference wasn't determination. Both were committed. The difference was diet. Amundsen ate like people who'd lived in extreme cold for millennia. Prioritised fat. Survived. Scott ate like the Royal Navy recommended. Proper balanced nutrition. Died. The Antarctic doesn't care about your credentials. It doesn't negotiate with institutional authority. It just kills you if you ignore what works.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, November 26, 2025

🇨🇦The Liberal government has just introduced Bill C-206 for a Universal Basic Income (UBI) in Canada.

Socialist Canada is no good to anyone.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

SAMA HOOLE: 1845 Franklin Expedition: 129 men. Provisions: Canned lean meats, hardtack, minimal fat. Result: All dead within 3 years. Scurvy. Starvation. Despite adequate calories.

Arctic expeditions had to choose provisions carefully. Wrong choice = death. 1845 Franklin Expedition: 129 men. Provisions: Canned lean meats, hardtack, minimal fat. Result: All dead within 3 years. Scurvy. Starvation. Despite adequate calories. 1903-1906 Roald Amundsen: Learned from Inuit. Provisions: Pemmican (50% fat), seal blubber, fatty meat. Result: All survived. Good health. Success. The difference: Fat content. Franklin's men had calories. They didn't have fat. They died.

Amundsen's men had fat. They thrived. Ernest Shackleton, Antarctic: Relied on seal and penguin (both high-fat).

Survived 2 years stranded. Zero scurvy despite no vegetables. Pattern is consistent: Expeditions that prioritised fat: Survived Expeditions that didn't: Dead Animal fat kept explorers alive in the harshest environments on Earth. But you're told to avoid it in your climate-controlled flat because it might raise your cholesterol. The explorers would think you're insane.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

DR. LAWRENCE SELLIN: A Pro-CCP humiliation operation targeting the U.S. military. Together with Pro-CCP community leaders, dozens of Chinese dressed in quasi-CCP police uniforms appear to falsely wear U.S. military medals. Yet, New York police officials and politicians ignore it and give them awards.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

SAMA HOOLE: Human dietary history: Inuit--Seal, whale, caribou. Three foods. Zero deficiencies. Maasai--Blood, milk, meat. Three foods. Perfect health. Mongols--Mutton, fermented dairy. Two foods. Conquered half the world.

Nutritional adequacy comes from eating the right foods, not the most foods. --Sama Hoole
"You need a balanced diet with lots of variety!"
Human dietary history: Inuit: Seal, whale, caribou. Three foods. Zero deficiencies. Maasai: Blood, milk, meat. Three foods. Perfect health. Mongols: Mutton, fermented dairy. Two foods. Conquered half the world. Modern human: 35 different foods per week including quinoa, chia seeds, açaí berries, and spirulina. Deficient in everything. Needs supplements. Variety is how food companies sell you more products. Nutritional adequacy comes from eating the right foods, not the most foods. Your ancestors didn't have "variety." They had nutrient density. One of these approaches worked.
Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

SAMA HOOLE: Mackarness argued: "The fattening substance is carbohydrate. Animal fat doesn't make you fat."

No sugar, no carbs, just meat, butter, and cream.  --Dr. Richard Mackarness

1958: British doctor Richard Mackarness publishes "Eat Fat and Grow Slim." The title alone was heretical. Everyone "knew" fat made you fat. Mackarness argued: "The fattening substance is carbohydrate. Animal fat doesn't make you fat." He cited thousands of his own patients who lost weight eating high-fat, low-carb diets. The book sold over a million copies. People tried it. It worked. For about 5 years, Mackarness was vindicated. His approach was mainstream in Britain. Then the American dietary guidelines came. The Seven Countries Study. The fat hypothesis. By the 1970s, "Eat Fat and Grow Slim" was considered dangerous pseudoscience. Mackarness was called a quack. His clinical results dismissed as anecdotal. He'd successfully treated thousands of obese patients. Documented their weight loss. Published the outcomes.

None of it mattered. The narrative had shifted. Fat was now the enemy. Carbs were fine. Mackarness spent the rest of his career fighting the new orthodoxy. Lost that fight. He died in 1996. His book is out of print. His work forgotten. He was right in 1958. We're still pretending he wasn't.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Tuesday, November 25, 2025

SAMA HOOLE: Every ancestor in your line dreamed of your Tuesday.

Think about how many of your ancestors barely survived long enough to reproduce. Famine. Disease. War. Poverty. Hardship. They survived on whatever food they could get. Often inadequate. Often just grains and root vegetables because that's all there was. They didn't thrive on it. They survived despite it. Each generation barely making it. Malnourished. Struggling. But they survived. They reproduced. They passed on the genes. So you could exist. And now you exist. In abundance. With access to optimal nutrition. You're the first generation in your bloodline with unlimited access to red meat. And you're voluntarily choosing the famine food they were forced to eat. Every ancestor in your line dreamed of your Tuesday.

Honor their sacrifice. Don't squander it. Eat the meat. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,

— C3 (@C_3C_3): 11 [states that] offer free healthcare to illegals and DO NOT require Voter ID . . .

Free healthcare to illegals.  Say that a few times . . . .

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

🚨#BREAKING: U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy is issuing a nationwide call for Americans to stop boarding planes dressed in pajamas and slippers.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

🚨 BREAKING: Bombshell Senate report exposes that the Biden administration forced at least 11 airports to HOUSE illegal aliens and migrants - despite warnings it might place American travelers at risk

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , ,

SAMA HOOLE: 1800s European settlers averaged 5'5" to 5'6". The "savages" were towering over the "civilised" men by 3-4 inches. What were the Plains Indians eating? Bison. Almost exclusively. Fatty meat, organ meats, bone marrow, pemmican (dried meat mixed with rendered fat).

When European settlers first encountered Plains Indians in the 1800s, they were stunned. The Lakota, Cheyenne, and other Plains tribes averaged 5'8" to 5'10". European settlers averaged 5'5" to 5'6". The "savages" were towering over the "civilised" men by 3-4 inches. What were the Plains Indians eating? Bison. Almost exclusively. Fatty meat, organ meats, bone marrow, pemmican (dried meat mixed with rendered fat). Zero agriculture. Zero grains. Zero vegetables for most of the year. Pure animal products. What were the Europeans eating? Bread. Porridge. Potatoes. Minimal meat (expensive). The diet recommended by every nutritional authority. The civilisation built on agriculture produced shorter, weaker men than the "primitive" buffalo hunters. The settlers noted this in their journals. Constantly. They were intimidated by the physical presence of Plains Indians. Taller. Stronger. Better teeth. Better bone structure. More muscular. One group ate meat. One group ate grains.  

The results were literally measurable in inches. 

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: , , , ,

SAMA HOOLE: The skeletons don't lie. The transition from hunting to farming was a health disaster.

10,000 BC: Humans hunt megafauna. Average height: 5'9". Bone density: exceptional. Teeth: perfect. Brain: 1,400cc. Chronic disease: zero. Diet: 60-80% calories from animal fat. 9,000 BC: Agricultural revolution begins. First farmers start eating grains instead of hunting. 8,000 BC: Skeletal analysis shows what happened next:

Height drops 6 inches within generations. Bone density decreases dramatically. Dental cavities appear for first time in human fossil record. --Sama Hoole

10,000 BC: Humans hunt megafauna. Average height: 5'9". Bone density: exceptional. Teeth: perfect. Brain: 1,400cc. Chronic disease: zero. Diet: 60-80% calories from animal fat. 9,000 BC: Agricultural revolution begins. First farmers start eating grains instead of hunting. 8,000 BC: Skeletal analysis shows what happened next: Height drops 6 inches within generations. Bone density decreases dramatically. Dental cavities appear for first time in human fossil record. Nutritional deficiencies visible in bones. Skeletal deformities from malnutrition. Lifespan actually decreases despite "settled civilisation." Archaeological term for this: "Agricultural decline" or "Neolithic decline." We traded individual health for population growth. Quality for quantity. Agriculture wasn't progress. It was adaptation to scarcity after we hunted fat-rich megafauna to extinction. We were so good at hunting that we eliminated our primary food source and needed a backup plan. The backup plan kept us alive. But we got shorter, weaker, sicker. The skeletons don't lie. The transition from hunting to farming was a health disaster. But it allowed population explosion, so civilisation formed anyway. We've been paying for it ever since.

Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)