He was a comic the same time I was in LA for years and years. I don’t hate the guy or anything he’s just wildly over rated at insulting people. He appears to be good at maintaining a show and a Culture tho. Obviously he’s good at something. He took open mic bringer shows and… https://t.co/Csjtu95TGa
He was a comic at the same time I was in LA for years and years. I don’t hate the guy or anything he’s just wildly overrated at insulting people. He appears to be good at maintaining a show and a culture, tho. Obviously, he’s good at something.
He took open mic bringer shows and committed so hard for so long and made so many connections that he now does an open mic with crazy people that suck in Madison Square Garden. Obviously, that’s very impressive. But he’s not actually funny. And that’s a fact. It’s an objective fact. He gets points for being “against pc culture,” so people want to laugh but if you listen it’s actually not funny. Look at Harland Williams when he did "Kill Tony." Harland isn’t known as a quick insult comic and he’s way way way way better than anyone else on the stage. Not even close. He made David Lucas cry like a deflating burnt diabetic marshmallow.
Most comics are way funnier than Tony Hinchcliff. You’ll see.
2. No Ukraine in NATO.
3. Mandatory demilitarization and de-nazification of Ukraine.
4. All the goals of the SVO [Special Military Operations] will be achieved.
-Permanent Representative of Russia to the United Nations, Vasily Nebenzya
In other words, this war will end when military objectives have been achieved. There is basically no room for negotiations with this position
All reporting comes down to unearthing facts. Facts don't speak for themselves. They can't. Information is neutral until it gets put into the hands of others where it then takes on a life of its own. This information here is stunning. And it confirms a friend's complaint, who says, "The government is either trying to put you in jail, castrate you, or kill you." I would add that they're also trying to bankrupt you, all in no particular order.
Forced sterilization is still legal in the U.S.
Earlier this year, a DHS OIG report found that ICE’s Health Service Corps (IHSC) failed to follow proper approval processes for major surgeries on detainees.
Forced sterilization is still legal in the U.S.
Earlier this year, a DHS OIG [Office of Inspector General] report found that ICE’s Health Service Corps (IHSC) failed to follow proper approval processes for major surgeries on detainees.
About 32% of sampled surgeries were not approved by qualified officials, leading to concerns over medical necessity documentation.
Notably, two of six hysterectomies reviewed lacked adequate medical justification.
The fix—IHSC updated its policies to ensure the Regional or Clinical Directors approve all major surgeries going forward.
Judge Joe Brown just dropped a major revelation—George Soros is a big investor in Kamala Harris. It’s definitely a popcorn moment, folks! Grab your snacks and get ready for the drama. 🍿 pic.twitter.com/F4GG071yTw
WHY would Putin ever agree to any agreement with Ukraine when they NEVER comply with what they agree to.
Another stipulation is that Ukraine may never join NATO. Russia has repeatedly stated that it is not battling Ukraine but the NATO alliance that has them cornered. NATO has become the aggressor in this conflict that has grown to such proportions that admitting Ukraine would instantly lead to World War III under Article V that demands all NATO members attack in unison.
Donald Trump has long stated that he would end the war in Ukraine if elected president. Confident in his ability to do so, the former president has stated he could end the conflict in 24 hours and has guaranteed to do so before he actually enters the White House. He finally revealed how he intends to accomplish such a feat.
It begins by revisiting the failed Minsk Agreement – the entire premise of the current war. François Hollande and Angela Merkel representing France and Germany at the time brokered the agreement between Russia and Ukraine. The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) monitored negotiations and both sides agreed to an immediate ceasefire. Russia withdrew troops from Ukraine for one primary reason — the Donetsk and Luhansk regions were to be occupied territories that would have the autonomy to vote in their own elections.
These regions were never Ukrainian territory. It was occupied by Russians for centuries. The people there had a right to their own lives. The Ukrainians demanded they no longer speak Russian and they sought to deny them even their own religion and they were to report to Kyiv instead of Moscow. This was like Mexico reclaiming Texas and demanding English was to be outlawed only Spanish was to be spoken and all religions were to be outlawed except allegiance to the Archbishop of Mexico.
The ethnic Russians in the Donbas did not want to submit to a central government from Kyiv itself. The Obama Administration really opposed this sort of settlement on the grounds of old-world empire theory predicated on the territorial integrity of Ukraine. Such policies have led to the death of hundreds of millions of people over the centuries.
Europe brokered the Minsk Agreement as a ploy to buy time. Angela Merkel admitted a few years ago that they negotiated in bad faith with Putin simply to allow Ukraine time to fortify itself, thereby buying time to build its army. She also said that at the time, NATO was weak and could not provide support to Kyiv to the extent they do currently. The Minsk Agreements were signed to pretend to resolve the Donbas conflict.
WHY would Putin ever agree to any agreement with Ukraine when they NEVER comply with what they agree to. It is now abundantly clear that the Minsk agreements were NEVER intended to be carried out by the current Kyiv government. They were simply used to buy time to build up their forces for war against Russia.
Another stipulation is that Ukraine may never join NATO. Russia has repeatedly stated that it is not battling Ukraine but the NATO alliance that has them cornered. NATO has become the aggressor in this conflict that has grown to such proportions that admitting Ukraine would instantly lead to World War III under Article V that demands all NATO members attack in unison.
Trump’s former advisors have stated that America would have no role in enforcing any peace treaty agreements. This is not our war. “There are two things America will insist on. We will not have any men or women in the enforcement mechanism. We’re not paying for it. Europe is paying for it,” his former advisor added.
A strong leader like Donald Trump who does not align himself with the neocons could possibly persuade Putin, but who will persuade Zelensky? Zelensky’s Victory Plan includes the annihilation of Russia which is precisely what the neocons have been after. Who will convince the allies who have provided trillions in funding to Ukraine? Let’s also remember that the neocons are on both sides of the political spectrum and Trump would have trouble convincing his fellow Republicans to walk away from this war.
I’ve said it numerous times, but one of the most impressive traits Trump displayed to me was empathy. When I went to visit Mar-a-Lago in 2020, Trump said he was tired of calling mothers to tell them that their sons died fighting in the Middle East. It was the first time I heard a politician actually discuss the citizens on the battlefield who are sent off to die in these neocon war games. Trump said that there had been war in the Middle East for most of known modern history and America simply had no place there. Likewise, America has no place in Russia or Ukraine.
Socrates states that Trump could slow down the war cycle, but he cannot prevent the inevitable. It is true that Donald Trump could delay the onsetof the growing global conflict BUT he cannot alter the cycle. Our computer shows that war could break out by 2027, and the financial implications will be fully felt by 2028.
I was vaguely familiar with the Asch Experiment, how one participant's knowledge, opinion, or understanding of shared reality can be manipulated by the group. When I worked in a large school district, I saw his all the time. To shore up consensus on some new program, or new trend, the district would stack a conference or a training program with personnel loyal to the district heads and program lieutenants. To outsiders, this sounds like a conspiracy theory. But one brave teacher raised his hand in a conference of about 40 "teachers" and asked bluntly, "How many of you in this room are district plants?" And either stupidly or naively, a dozen hands went up.
Solomon Asch's famous experiment, showing that people bow to majority pressure, denying their own perceptions, successfully replicates in foreign country. And everybody is a conformist. https://t.co/wrAyiXoRs3pic.twitter.com/IfjKo67dCY
I just had no idea that the Asch Experiment could corral 60% of an audience. This means, contrary to the video above, that you don't need a majority of the audience to be privy to or participants in the experiment. It's that powerful. The cognitive dissonance of your own judgment is enough to change our minds. And that change doesn't even have to be done with convictions, simply by peer pressure to conform. I had no idea how powerful that was. Well, I kind of did. Look at any organization. If a rumor is begun about you, and those spreading the rumor placed within it the instruction to commit violence, then that conformity contains a whole new level of concern.
And people wonder how the Covid hysteria happened with the liberals going out of control. pic.twitter.com/TCObDXi12W
Fascinating. This experiment shows how our reality can be shaped by others. This is why 99% of people wear masks, give vaccines to their babies, get the yearly flu shot, etc. Notice how people say, "I got MY flu shot." It's why people post images of themselves with a bandaid on… pic.twitter.com/S3KUwQGXNC
— Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪 (@catsscareme2021) July 20, 2024
This explains why critical thinking skills are essential for survival. Too many of us take our life, our health, our wealth, and our survival for granted.
If you consume what you produce, it's not counted in the total GDP of the economy...
Meaning if you're growing your own fruits and veggies, eating your own chickens and milking your own cows, you count as ZERO for the economy and thus don't help increase government tax revenue,… pic.twitter.com/W8srqWlQDw
Not a fan of either in this conversation but the analyzer points out some valuable insights to help you deal with anyone trying to assert their dominance with you or bully you in conversation.
The other person twists your words and tries to make you look dumb so you'll learn how to defend yourself in any argument.
SPOT WHEN THEY ENTER FIGHT MODE
First step to defend yourself against a conversational bully is to identify when the conversation goes into fight mode. Like if they're shouting or cutting you off. But there's a subtler tell as well, like when Pierce is there to argue with Tate and not to understand him. Two tells here: if someone labels you or an idea you stand by as an issue or problematic that's a good indicator that they've switched into fight mode or if they want to argue with you before asking you to explain your point of view. If that happens, you should start being wary of conversational traps.
MISQUOTING
One of the most common traps is misquoting you. Misquoting you makes it easier for the other person to feel like they're dominating you because they're attacking a straw man instead of your actual views. Sounds like it would be easy to catch but sometimes it only takes a small tweak to your words to have a big impact on their meaning. If you weren't paying attention, you may not notice the small tweak. For example, listen to Andrew respond when Piers asks him what his opinion of Alex Jones is after meeting him.
He was professional and courteous to me when. I meet somebody and they show me respect, I show them back respect. That's what I do as I did with you.
PIERS: You respect him?
If somebody shows me respect, I show them respect back.
PIERS: So if Adolf Hitler . . . if Adolf Hitler showed you respect, you would respect him back?
That's a huge difference between showing someone respect by being polite versus having respect for them and their ideas. Andrew even catches this at first, but Piers is persistent in establishing that straw man.
PIERS: Well I'm not. I'm taking your position that if somebody shows you respect, you respect them. I'm saying there are lots of people in the world I do not respect. If Vladimir Putin showed me respect, I would not respect him.
That's your opinion. But you . . .
I know it's my view. What's your view? Your view is you would.
You can see Piers trying to force a view upon Andrew that he doesn't actually believe. So you have to be careful not to let someone misquote you or you may find yourself defending a belief that upon reflection you don't even have. Luckily there is a simple solution for this. If you're aware of it, re-establish your own point of view before you defend it.
You say that people don't want to see men dressed up like transgender people.
That's not exactly what I said.
What did you say?
I said the reason I am so popular and I'm so famous is that there is a large contingent of men who don't want to wear makeup, who still want to make money, go to the gym, be strong, drive a fast car, be traditionally masculine, and don't want to be shamed for that. They don't want to be called toxic for that.
Now if you do start to make good points in an argument you'll have to watch out for this next trick.
DERAILING INTERRUPTIONS
This is when someone tries to interrupt you before you can establish your strongest point you're taking the sentences and your weaponizing them against me I'm not weaponizing anything.
You can see in that clip that the interruptions are starting to bother Andrew. Luckily there are three ways you can handle being interrupted.
TRICK #1
First trick is to pause, acknowledge the person then return to the point that you were making.
PIERS: All I've done is literally read out all the things we identified from all the research that I thought were blatantly misogynist and give you the chance to respond. The only time I've interrupted you is when you've tried to answer a completely different question.
TATE: Understood Pierce.
You can even see a little smile in Piers' eyes after. That's because most people in an argument crave to feel heard and understood.
TRICK #2
Here's another example. You can steal this line word for word if you want to acknowledge someone without agreeing with them. This time, Piers even makes a little positive noise after Andrew acknowledges him.
TATE: I don't think so.
PIERS: And I think your view of that is . . . that view is dangerous.
TATE: I respect that you think my view is dangerous, and I respect you have the right to view that.
That line is a nice way to remain connected with someone without giving ground you don't agree with. It makes the other person feel heard and that disarms their need to attack. Now, once someone has established a pattern of interrupting you, the next thing you can do is preempt their interruption. Here's an example.
And this is actually what is interesting. And please don't interrupt me on this point. Social media has changed in modern times.
4:20. You can even see Pierce's body language change as he disengages to respect Andrew's request.
TRICK #3: ONE-FINGER STOP GESTURE
If the person continues to interrupt you you can call it out with a one-finger stopped gesture.
PIERS: No, no, let's stop for a second.
TATE: Please don't interrupt me. Here's why I know, why your job first you interrupt people a lot, which is a good skill. I believe in marriage more than anybody, in fact, I believe in marriage. No, please, I believe in marriage in the traditional sense.
DON'T STEAMROLL CONCESSIONS
Now on the flip side, you also want to avoid the trap of being the interrupter, especially if someone is responding to a point you've made. Don't steamroll concessions. There were a few times there when Piers actually made a good point but he interrupts so much that Andrew can't even agree with him.
PIERS: Well, you did say at the start of this little exchange, you said, "Well, I wouldn't maybe say things the same way now that I did before I was famous," and yet, actually, you've doubled down and said exactly the same thing.
On certain points . . .
So that is what you believe. That's my point, yes, I'm trying to work out . . . . Look, I don't know you. We just met, right? Steamrolling concession prevents you from reaching common ground with the person you're talking to. If there's anyone else listening, it also makes it harder for them to register that you've made a good point. There's one more example so you can see what not to do.
Well I think my sister is my, her husband's property.
Yes, so fundamentally I don't believe a man owns a woman. You do.
In 2016 the American College of Pediatricians made a public statement expressing concern that the amount of Polysorbate 80 in Gardasil HPV vaccines was linked to the development of premature menopause in young women.
As a side note, Polysorbate 80 is also often used to induce INFERTILITY in lab rats.
Now … guess what contains 200x the amount of Polysorbate 80 as Gardasil?
Vitamin K shots.
It's just shocking to me because the amount of Polysorbate 80 that is in the Gardasil vaccines is 50 micrograms [that's mcgs] per injection.
So if you, if it's a three-shot series, that's 150 micrograms total.
If it's a two-shot series, that's a 100 micrograms total. And they were concerned enough about it to issue this position statement.
Yet the vitamin K shot that we are giving universally to almost every hospital-born baby in United States has 10 mg of Polysorbate 80.
That's 200 times the amount of polysorbate 80 that's in a Gardasil vaccine.
People used to ask me, you know, "Is this a depopulation agenda?" and as a scientist, for me, I just couldn't go there. You know, I'm like I'm trying to be objective here. I am looking at the data, but when I saw that it was like, you know, I can't really say that it's not, and it's, it's pretty, pretty . . . pretty damning, I think.
Long-term wearing of masks is not benign. They work at making us sick by inhaling our exhaled waste. By hypoxia lack of oxygen to the brain especially dangerous for children. Masks are tools of subservience, disease & control. Only slaves mask their face & their voice. Resist.
I mean what level of degradation have you been trained to tolerate?
Would you still eat farm-raised salmon again?
BREAKING: The USDA is now licensing DNA vaccines in our food! @catsscareme2021 is correct they are vaccinating salmon but what you may not know is that the deadly mRNA poison vaccines weren’t enough for the Biden Harris administration. They and their big pharma partners are now… https://t.co/xF252nZPD5pic.twitter.com/uvndKC9nBw
Our neighbors cow unvaxxed only grass fed who lived an awesome life outside in paradise with butter we made from our cows with seasoning from our greenhouse in a cast iron skillet. This is what the country is all about. There’s no restaurant in the world that can replicate this. pic.twitter.com/9Ap0mEreGb
"This is what I read years and years and years ago, that people will have a digital ID...doctors...won't be required, and the same with the teachers...[there will be an] AI system...They're geared up merely for taking organs the way [hospitals in the U.K. are] ran."
FIRST: There is no such thing as vaccine induced herd immunity. That’s a lie created by the vax industry.
In lesson 3 I have an interview with Dr. Wakefield about this very topic - and how vaccines destroy natural immunity.
SECOND: EVERY vax vs unvax study shows that the unvaccinated are radically more healthy than the vaccinated, and this is exactly why the CDC will never do such a study: parents would immediately stop vaccinating if they knew the truth.
THIRD: vaccines never saved us. For example, death from measles dropped 99.96% prior to the vaccine. Measles is easily treatable with vitamins A, C and D. And homeopathy. I discuss this in lessons 1 and 2.
FOURTH: Even in 100% vaccinated populations (supposed herd immunity) there have been outbreaks. This is because creating antibodies from aggressively overstimulating the TH2 immune response (while ignoring the very important TH1 immune response) by injecting highly toxic adjuvants into helpless infants does NOT create immunity - it creates antibodies; which are really just an allergic response.
FIFTH: When a vaccinated person winds up with the disease they were vaccinated against, the unvaccinated are blamed for that infection, rather than a FAULTY PROCESS. This gives rise as justification for vaccine mandates.
There’s more. A lot more. But hopefully she’ll review the course, watch the Documentaries and read the book by Moskowitz.
The greatest medical discovery or biggest con job of all time?
“…since blood-poisoning of our children was enforced by Act of Parliament, small-pox has increased both in extent and frequency. Now vaccination by calf-pox, cow-pox, or humanised pox, whatever may be the… pic.twitter.com/dpDKw6y91T
If you are a parent, find this group on Facebook and join. Great place to ask questions or give advice about vaccines and raising a vaccine free child. pic.twitter.com/8jjGsPofLK
A recent study showed that cashiers have high levels of these endocrine disrupting compounds in their bodies (PMID: 26309242) pic.twitter.com/YoMSc1tnHx
These are endocrine-disruptive chemicals that can actually be absorbed through your skin. So just touching one at a grocery store every once in a while isn't the end of the world, but I would like to avoid as many endocrine disruptors in my life, thank you, as I can. So, I either don't get the receipt, or I'm just going to use my handy-dandy wool shirt here to put the receipt in the trash and not touch it. So if you are touching a lot of receipts in your daily life, don't touch the thermal paper receipts, and you will decrease your exposure to BPA and BPS and endocrine-disrupting chemicals that can be messing up your hormones.
What sets Brianne Dressen apart from nearly every other COVID-19 jab-injured person out there?
She has a signed contract with AstraZeneca saying that they would pay for any harm their product caused her during the COVID-19 clinical trial she signed up for.
Brianne says she suffered a disastrous injury from the trial shot and was never properly compensated.
So for this reason, she and her lawyers — including attorney Michael Connett of the recent federal fluoride win — believe that her case may have what it takes to go all the way.
The following video is brought to you by Covington.
3:40BRIX is usually used for measuring sugar content or salinity and other suspended solids, and basically with plants as you increase the plant's health it will have more suspended sugars, solids, micronutrients, salts, all those kinds of things in the plant sap. So as you improve the health of the plant, that plant will have higher concentrations, so your BRIX value will go up. So that's the basic principle.
Darla Smith describes having hospital staff call the cops on her when she tried to give her husband ivermectin *after obtaining a court order to give it*.
Later, the hospital goons killed her husband with a ventilator and a bevy of drugs and called it a COVID death. (Surely they collected their CARES Act bounty—my assumption.)
This clip is taken from an interview Smith did with Children's Health Defense (@ChildrensHD). Her husband was killed in a University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in November 2021.
Partial transcription of clip:
Polly Tommey: "Do you believe that the hospital killed your husband?"
Darla Smith: "A hundred percent. Yeah. Because I tried to get ivermectin for him. I took them to the court
the week after he had been intubated for about a week.
We got a court date. Five days later, the judge issued
the court order saying that he wouldn't make UPMC [University of Pittsburgh Medical Center] give Keith the ivermectin, but that I had the right to have a
a board certified PA or certified RN come in and deliver it, and then they fought me on it.
"I had a court order, the 12-hour standoff there in the ICU. They called the cops on me. It was crazy. I was like, 'I don't understand why you're blocking this drug' ... oh, I signed a waiver saying that they would have zero responsibility legally if the ivermectin caused an issue. And they called the cops on me.
"None of it made any sense. I still can't figure out why they so actively blocked a drug like that that could have potentially helped him if we had gotten it into him earlier. So, yeah, I wanna know how much money did they get after he died because it had a COVID-19 cause of death on the death certificate. So how much money did you get, whether it was CARES Act funds or whatever type of funds are out there? No one seems to know, but I guarantee they had to have had some type of financial incentive for their rigidity and their lack of treatment."
Trump promoted national ID on Rogan - the next step to a total control grid. Along with vaccines, this is what the central bankers want and need to get complete control. Looks like the establishment factions have agreed that Trump is their man to lead patriots and conservatives… https://t.co/gIYqyCa2sl
Boom! Ozone strikes again. Excellent - I’ve been using it for 20 years- there’s great articles on clearing spike proteins using 03 (oxygen + ozone) https://t.co/W61qzsFgov
When antioxidants can donate electrons back to oxidized biomolecules (reduction), the normal function of these biomolecules is restored (Levy, 2019). This is the reason why sufficient antioxidant therapy, such as can be achieved by highly-dosed intravenous vitamin C, has proven to be so profoundly effective in blocking and even reversing the negative clinical impact of any toxin or poison. There exists no toxin against which vitamin C has been tested that has not been effectively neutralized (Levy, 2002). There is no better way to save a patient clinically poisoned by any agent than by immediately administering a sizeable intravenous infusion of sodium ascorbate. The addition of magnesium chloride to the infusion is also important to protect against sudden life-threatening arrhythmias that can occur before a sufficient number of the newly-oxidized biomolecules can be reduced and any remaining toxin is neutralized and excreted.
Rouleaux Formation Post-COVID Vaccination
The dark field blood examinations seen below come from a 62-year-old female who had received the COVID vaccination roughly 60 days earlier. The first picture reveals mild rouleaux formation of the blood. After a sequence of six autohemotherapy ozone passes, the second picture shows a completely normal appearance of the RBCs.
A second patient, a young adult male who received his vaccination 15 days earlier without any side effects noted and feeling completely well at the time, had the dark field examination of his blood performed. This first examination seen below revealed severe rouleaux formations of the RBCs with extensive branching, appearing to literally involve all of the RBCs visualized in an extensive review of multiple different microscopic fields. He then received one 400 ml ozonated saline infusion followed by a 15,000 mg infusion of vitamin C. The second picture reveals a complete and immediate resolution of the rouleaux formation seen on the first examination. Furthermore, the normal appearance of the RBCs was still seen 15 days later, giving some reassurance that the therapeutic infusions had some durability, and possibly permanency, in their positive impact.
Suggested Protocol (to be coordinated with the guidance of your chosen health care provider):
For individuals who are post-vaccination or symptomatic with chronic COVID, vitamin C should be optimally dosed, and it should be kept at a high but lesser dose daily indefinitely.
Ideally, an initial intravenous administration of 25 to 75 grams of vitamin C should be given depending on body size. Although one infusion would likely resolve the symptoms and abnormal blood examination, several more infusions can be given if feasible over the next few days.
An option that would likely prove to be sufficient and would be much more readily available to larger numbers of patients would be one or more rounds of vitamin C given as a 7.5 gram IV push over roughly 10 minutes, avoiding the need for a complete intravenous infusion setup, a prolonged time in a clinic, and substantially greater expense (Riordan-Clinic-IVC-Push-Protocol, 10.16.14.pdf).
Additionally, or alternatively if IV is not available, 5 grams of liposome-encapsulated vitamin C (LivOn Labs) can be given daily for at least a week.
When none of the above three options are readily available, a comparable positive clinical impact will be seen with the proper supplementation of regular forms of oral vitamin C as sodium ascorbate or ascorbic acid. Either of these can be taken daily in three divided doses approaching bowel tolerance after the individual determines their own unique needs (additional information, see Levy, vitamin C Guide in References; Cathcart, 1981).
An excellent way to support any or all of the above measures for improving vitamin C levels in the body is now available and very beneficial clinically. A supplemental polyphenol that appears to help many to overcome the epigenetic defect preventing the internal synthesis of vitamin C in the liver can be taken once daily. This supplement also appears to provide the individual with the ability to produce and release even greater amounts of vitamin C directly into the blood in the face of infection and other sources of oxidative stress (www.formula216.com).
Hydrogen peroxide (HP) nebulization (Levy, 2021, free eBook) is an antiviral and synergistic partner with vitamin C, and it is especially important in dealing with acute or chronic COVID, or with post-COVID vaccination issues. As noted above, the COVID virus can persist in the stool. In such cases, a chronic pathogen colonization (CPC) of COVID in the throat continually supplying virus that is swallowed into the gut is likely present as well, even when the patient seems to be clinically normal. This will commonly be the case when specific viral eradication measures were not taken during the clinical course of the COVID infection. HP nebulization will clear out this CPC, which will stop the continued seeding of the COVID virus in the gut and stool as well. Different nebulization approaches are discussed in the eBook.
When available, ozonated saline and/or ozone autohemotherapy infusions are excellent. Conceivably, this approach alone might suffice to knock out the spike protein presence, but the vitamin C and HP nebulization approaches will also improve and maintain health in general. Ultraviolet blood irradiation and hyperbaric oxygen therapy will likely achieve the same therapeutic effect if available.
Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and chloroquine are especially important in preventing new binding of the spike protein to the ACE2 receptors that need to be bound in order for either the spike protein alone or for the entire virus to gain entry into the target cells (Lehrer and Rheinstein, 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Eweas et al., 2021). These agents also appear to have the ability to directly bind up any circulating spike protein before it binds any ACE2 receptors (Fantini et al., 2020; Sehailia and Chemat, 2020; Saha and Raihan, 2021). When the ACE2 receptors are already bound, the COVID virus cannot enter the cell (Pillay, 2020). These three agents also serve as ionophores that promote intracellular accumulation of zinc that is needed to kill/inactivate any intact virus particles that might still be present.
Many other positive nutrients, vitamins, and minerals are supportive of defeating the spike protein, but they should not be used to the exclusion of the above, especially the combination of highly-dosed vitamin C and HP nebulization.
Toby, Fauci was not in charge of the covid policy. He is a spokesperson, nothing else. This is a stupid charade, our government is laughing at us. The people who came up with the lockdown until vax policy are National Security Council - all DOD and spooks!… pic.twitter.com/lhixtT75Eo
— sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" (@sasha_latypova) June 4, 2024
So, will RFK Jr hold Colonel Mat Hepburn of DARPA accountable for his Pandemic Preparedness Racket scam? Anyone at DARPA, BARDA, DOD? Why did Mat Hepburn direct the entire pharma consortium to switch to making COVID vaccines on Feb 4, 2020, a full month before "pandemic" was announced? Who gave him authority to declare a national security threat when there never was one?
So, will RFK Jr hold Colonel Mat Hepburn of DARPA accountable for his Pandemic Preparedness Racket scam? Anyone at DARPA, BARDA, DOD? Why did Mat Hepburn direct the entire pharma consortium to switch to making covid vaccines on Feb 4, 2020, a full month before "pandemic" was… pic.twitter.com/L2ijuptQ25
— sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" (@sasha_latypova) July 11, 2024
And let's not forget that most evil, corrupt heartless and bloodthirsty circuit of judges -- the DC circuit, of which James Boasberg is chief. He is also, fun fact, a member of Yale's Skull & Bones (appointed by another S&B, George W Bush) so we are looking at the agenda of a… https://t.co/ciKEDFNdA0
Biden/Harris DOJ is the most evil, corrupt, heartless, and bloodthirsty agency to ever represent the good people of the United States.
Sandra Weyer, 61, was convicted at a bench trial (Obama appointee and chief judge James Boasberg) of 1512 felony and 4 misdemeanors. He sentenced her to 14 months in prison. She was sent to federal prison in Philadelphia where real criminals are behind bars and she was tormented with rotten food, rodents, and freezing temperatures.
Boasberg released her after more than 3 months in prison pending her appeal of 1512c2--which was overturned by SCOTUS on June 28--and for serving the "average" amount of time for a misdemeanor offense.
DOJ moved to resentence her on the remaining 4 misdemeanors. Weyer's attorney Nick Smith emailed the DOJ prosecutor to ask if DOJ would seek more jail time, notifying [them that] DOJ Weyer's HUSBAND JUST DIED.
