Therry, the guy who got the original Pfizer documents released under court order, he filed another lawsuit on behalf of Del Bigtree and the V-Safe database got released the last and it's big, big news. This is Rochelle Walensky's database, this is what she's criminally liable for. So this is absolutely shocking and it confirms again independently what Ed Dowd and his datasets have been showing you, which is disabilities and injuries of Americans at an industrial scale that you cannot even imagine, and I can't stress enough, Steve, this is the government database of what happens when you get injected with these vaccines. This is Rochelle Walensky's custody database. It shows 700,000+ doctor's visits. 6.4 million health impact. Over 2 million serious adverse events, serious side effects. And this is adverse events like I can't work, I can't engage in my normal activities, I'm disabled. So these are injuries of Americans at a massive scale. And remember, this is what Ed Dowd showed you when he said that there's a huge jump in the rate of disability claims per his datasets, which were insurance industry datasets. And the people who are being harmed are working age Americans. So this independent V-Safe dataset confirms that in absolutely horrific detail severely injured to the point of not being able to work, having to see their doctors, going to the Emergency Room, subsequent to the injections. This is not random. This is what happened after you got vaccinated. And Rochelle Walensky didn't just know, she was in charge of it and she kept . . . this is why I say it was mass murder on a massive scale. She knew and she kept saying "safe and effective." She knew and she kept saying "No serious side effects. Maybe you'll feel tired. Maybe you'll get a headache." She knew that millions of Americans were going to the Emergency Rooms, seeing their doctors, too disabled to work. You know, hundreds of thousands having serious adverse events. She knew it . . .
"WHAT WE'VE COME TO FIND IS THAT THIS [MISSING OATHS OF OFFICE ISSUE] IS RAMPANT [AND] THAT IT PROBABLY GOES BACK TO 1964."
When Adams inquires about Trump's cabinet, Callender says that "What we've come to find is that this [missing oaths of office issue] is rampant" and that… pic.twitter.com/ylrfNTzxkP
Skousen, who worked for the FBI, a Christian, and was a member of the John Birch Society, published the book, The Naked Communist, in 1958. In it, he outlined 45 goals of the communist party they would use to take control of the United States government. Man Today, we have 3 prominent federal government employees whose oath of office is questionable at best.
Llyod Austin's Oath of Office? Not properly notarized OR sworn in.
US Attorney General, Merrick Garland's Oath of Office? No specific date of appointment, not properly notarized.
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky's Oath of Office? Failed to specify WHICH POSITION, not properly notarized, not sworn in. Huh.
Attached here are several excerpts from the Petition for Writ of Quo Warranto* submitted to the U.S. Attorney by McGee (with Todd Callender and Kenneth W. Ferguson as her attorneys) following the receipt of the defective or missing oaths of office that she received in response to her FOIA requests.
The Writ says that Lloyd Austin's Oath of Office was produced, but "is not properly notarized or sworn."
Likewise, (supposed) U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland's oath "fails to specify the date when he was appointed"and"is not properly notarized or sworn."
Also, note that former (supposed) CDC Director Rochelle Walensky's oath "fails to specify which position she was appointed [to]" and "is not properly notarized or sworn."
Interestingly, McGee filed her Writ for Quo Warranto on April 12, 2023,**. Walensky, who's listed as a "senior advisor" on her oath, resigned from her position unceremoniously on May 5, 2023, ***.
Does President Donald Trump's Make America Great Again an attempt to purge the communists from within the United States government? Is this what he's fighting?
See for yourself. Here is the 1958 list of communist goalsfrom Skousen's book. You tell me if communists have taken over the United States government.
13. Do away with loyalty oaths. [Note: It is entirely proper and appropriate for our government to expect employees, paid by the American taxpayer, to take an oath of loyalty.]
Jan. 10, 1963, Congressman Albert S. Herlong Jr. of Florida read a list of 45 Communist goals into the Congressional Record. The list was derived from researcher, and former FBI Agent, Cleon Skousen’s book “The Naked Communist.” These principles are well worth revisiting today in order to gain insights into the thinking and strategies of much of our so-called liberal elite:
Socialism is seen as the bridge between Capitalism and Communism. The major difference between Socialism and Communism is in the method of takeover. Socialism (and Progressivism) believes that it can centralize all control of the individual, land and industry by peaceful, but gradual, legislation; whereas Communism seeks a violent and final confrontation to eliminate all dissension to achieve its Utopian goal of a Stateless and Classless society.
How does she get away with saying, "We have taken another important step together in our fight against COVID-19 by making safe and effective vaccines available for our little ones"? I mean she's not "in this together" when people suffer vaccine injury and death. "We have taken"? Really, I don't remember agreeing to anything related to the masks except being forced to wear them while interacting with customers. I never agreed to it. I was forced to, threatened to wear them. But my former employer didn't coerce me or other employees with vaccine mandates. But the local stores did. Oh, yeah, the stores posted signs that read, "If you are vaccinated, you're not required to wear a mask." Mighty nice of them, except that I wasn't vaccinated and yet I still entered the store without a mask.
I hope that everybody is realizing now, by now, that this whole pandemic was not about your safety nor was it about your health. You do know this, correct? Here is more conflicting testimony. FDA official, Peter Marks, explains that the vaccine produces 5x more viral myocarditis than what would normally be occurring. Really? Do you mean to tell me that myocarditis was a thing in the past, that it was a thing prior to the COVID-19 vaccines?
FDA official Dr. Peter Marks says vaccinated kids have a 5 fold increase of myocarditis. Why on earth are they pushing the COVID vaccine on babies? We still don’t know the long-term safety profile of these vaccines. pic.twitter.com/Ya3jdR3zRl
— Senator Ron Johnson (@SenRonJohnson) June 16, 2022
Wouldn't you assume that the CDC Director knows the claims publicized by the FDA? Or is it a case, like the FBI and the CIA, that they are competing agencies with each one fighting for a more supreme legitimacy? Marks serves as the Director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research within the Food and Drug Administration. So to answer my question, maybe they don't communicate at all. There would, in fact, be no need to.
Though I think for some of the younger members of our society who have little experience and little knowledge of how our government, and government in general, is more often in service of murdering you. Think about the wars, how they send young men off to die in a foreign land in which they have no real skin in the game or no epidermis in the competition. How many Mengeles does the United States have exactly? Wait, did I read that right? Fun Fact: Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Chief Medical Advisor to the President (who is NOT Jewish) was awarded Tel Aviv University's Dan David Prize with $1 million, for "speaking truth to power" amid the COVID-19 pandemic." What a pantload.
Tal Zaks is Chief Medical Officer of Moderna. Since 2021, he's been on the Board of Directors at TEVA Pharmaceuticals.
Leonard Schleifer cofounded
drugmaker Regeneron in 1988 and remains CEO of the Tarrytown, New York
company.
Schleifer took Regeneron public in
1991; he owns nearly 4% of the company's common stock.
Sales of Regeneron's blockbuster
drug Eylea, a treatment for macular degeneration, reached $4.6 billion in the
U.S. in 2019.
Regeneron has developed six
FDA-approved medicines.
In June 2020, Regeneron began
clinical trials of a new antibody medicine to prevent and treat people with
Covid-19.
Rachel Levine, born Richard Levine in 1957, became a "woman" in 2011, Levine is an American pediatrician and a 4-Star Admiral in the United States Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. He has been the United States Assistant Secretary for Health since March 26, 2021. Appointed by Biden, of course, the WEF's man in the White House. Regardless of where these folks got their medical or health degrees, be assured that they're top graduates from CLOWN COLLEGE.
Jeff Zients, Albert Bourla, Mikael Dolstein, Sherri Berger, Ann Schuchat, Dr. Rocelle P. Walensky, current Director of the CDC. Regarding psychopath, Dr. Rochelle P. Walendsky, you really should give this a listen. This one too. She's had zero credibility, and yet here she is advocating that children under 5 get 3 vaccine doses, let me remind you, for a disease that DOES NOT EFFECT CHILDREN.
"anyone
who experiences adverse events or dies, and anyone who is diagnosed with
COVID-19 before 2 weeks have passed after their second dose are not counted as
deaths in the "fully vaccinated". That means that a person who is
vaccinating might not be considered “Fully Vaccinated” until five weeks after
their first dose."
Further on,
Close
inspection of Moderna’s data made public ahead of the FDA’s Vaccines and
Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBAC) meeting that was
scheduled for Dec. 17, 2020, however, reveals that among the vaccinated, an
additional 81 participants and 118 among the placebo participants developed a
COVID-19 diagnosis between the first and second shots. These participants were
determined to be ineligible for the second dose and removed from the study.
More damning.
CDC’s Director, Rochelle Walensky, said
yesterday that CDC’s definition of “fully vaccinated” might need to be updated
due to boosters. This semantic gameplay would back the population into mandated
boosters if the OSHA rule through. Remember that it was Walensky who overruled
the FDA’s decision to not recommend boosters for all. So now, we are facing the
confusing situation in which people w/vaccine cards are no longer “fully
vaccinated”. As we have seen, the efficacy of the current vaccines against extinct
variants might be reasonably high (whatever it is), but the efficacy against
extant variants seems to be in question. So, with eternal boosters, perhaps no
one will ever be considered “Fully Vaccinated” in the US under CDC’s
ever-changing definition.
Semantic sleight of hand:
We
know that people who have had two doses are not considered “Fully Vaccinated”
until day 14 after their second dose. So, when new cases occur in the partially
vaccinated, they do not count toward cases in the vaccinated. There is
significant evidence that COVID-19 vaccination may impair the immune system for
a short period of time following administration; in particular, the likelihood
of a SARS-CoV-2 infection, or infection by any other respiratory virus or
bacterium may be more likely following vaccination. In animal trials on
SARS and MERS viruses, close relatives of SARS-CoV-2, and in studies in humans
of the RSV virus, this phenomenon was called “disease enhancement”. If disease
enhancement is occurring after the first dose, or within two weeks following
receipt of the second dose, the CDC’s semantics will bias the case count data
and make it appear as if those exposed to vaccines have a lower risk of
COVID-19 infection than those who are unvaccinated.
No data. No show. Unvaccinated. Where is the mandate for the CDC then? From a public policy agency that oversees the health of 365 million Americans.
Over 75% of CDC workers are unvaccinated and know better
than to put this poison in their bodies. Also, over 50% of CDC workers are working remotely, many of whom are lab technicians not even showing up to work in the lab. Shouldn't this be a clear example that the CDC is not interested in anyone's health but their own, so you should be too? Ignore CDC mandates. Ignore their advice. And in general, ignore advice that turns out to be "do as I say, not as I do" and the policy of "for thee, but not for me." Thank you, Senator Bill Cassidy, from Louisiana for embarrassing Doctor Rochelle Walensky, Director at the American CDC.
Perhaps joining the board at Pfizer? Who knows? But don't expect the lies to come to a halt. Hardly.
.@CDCDirector will quit next month. Never forget the moment she detonated the credibility of Biden's Covid mandates & other policies https://t.co/jMJQym6SSu
"It won't get reimbursed, so it gets labeled as anxiety."
"Factitious disorder"? In other words, she was making it up.
"I was muffled. I was told I was wrong. I was told to go home. And I was told not to talk." Why ask him not to talk if he's wrong?
"FEMA had offered me money if I changed my son's death certificate from enlarged heart to COVID."
The FDA wanted 75 years to release this data. Yeah, the FDA and the federal government is still your friend? Act accordingly.
"What the FDA did to me was contact Pfizer and get me fired," Brook Jackson.
"The patent for the Moderna vaccine is owned by the Department of Health and Human Services," Tom Renz.
"We don't have any secrets here," Peter Marks, FDA
"This is not about freedom or personal choice," President of the United States, Joe Biden.
Probably kind of important to remember the list of cowards who lied to help increase the number of Americans vaccinated.
Klaus Schwab
Bill Gates
Jacinda Ardern
Justin Trudeau
Joe Biden
Ashish Jha (C19 Coordinator)
Tony Fauci
Robert Califf (Head of FDA)
Peter Marks (FDA) who is on record at the 2:53 mark in the above trailer as saying, "For these mRNA vaccines, there is incredible BS out there about thousands of people dying out there, that just ain't true."
At the World Vaccine Congress, FDA's Peter Marks supported Gregory Poland’s position that the vaccine-hesitant are irrational, “It’s crazy that they don’t get how great vaccines are,” he said. “I am past trying to argue with people who think that vaccines are not safe.”… pic.twitter.com/xXXFMMRjhk
So far, the CDC has not determined
that any death was directly caused by the COVID shot, but that doesn’t mean the
injections haven’t killed anyone. Calculations using VAERS data suggest the
COVID shots have resulted in 212,000 excess deaths in the U.S.
An estimated 300,000 Americans suffered
permanent disability from the COVID shots, and anywhere from 2 million to 5
million may have suffered adverse reactions
If you’re under the age of 50, your
risk of dying from the vaccine is greater than your chance of dying from
COVID-19
Dr. Peter Schirmacher, chief
pathologist at the University of Heidelberg, who is recognized as one of the
top 100 pathologists in the world, autopsied 40 patients who died within two
weeks of their COVID jab, and found 30% to 40% of the deaths were conclusively
due to the shot
One top neurologist claims to have
2,000 reportable vaccine injuries in 2021, compared to zero in the last 11
years. In all, 5% of her existing patients now have suspected vaccine injuries,
but she has only filed two VAERS reports due to the complexity of the filing
Yesterday, October 8, 2021, I published
a Highwire exclusive interview with Deborah Conrad, a physician’s assistant who
is blowing the whistle on COVID jab injuries, and the fact that these injuries
are rarely reported because of a faulty VAERS database design.
Today you’re in for yet another
bombshell video: “Vaccine Secrets: COVID Crisis.” It’s the first episode of
“The False Narrative Takedown Series,” produced by Steve Kirsch, executive
director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund.
“Vaccine Secrets” complements and
supports everything Conrad shared in her interview, so I highly recommend
saving these files on your computer and watching both of them. Both are
available on Bitchute.
HOW MANY HAVE DIED FROM THE COVID JABS?
According to Kirsch, the COVID shots
have already killed an estimated 200,000 Americans, a far higher number than
the 15,386 deaths reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
(VAERS) as of September 17, 2021.1 You can find all the
research for Episode 1 of the “False Narrative Takedown” series on SKirsch.io/vaccine-resources.2
As noted by Kirsch, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky claims no causative link
has been found for any of these deaths. She’s not lying, per se. But she’s also
not telling the whole truth.
So far, the CDC has not determined that
any death was directly caused by the COVID shot, but that doesn’t mean the
injections haven’t killed anyone. In this episode, Kirsch sets out to determine
whether evidence of causality exists, and if so, what the actual death toll is
likely to be.
CAN VAERS DATA DEMONSTRATE CAUSALITY?
The big disconnect, Kirsch points out,
is that the CDC insists that VAERS, as an early warning system, cannot prove
(or disprove) causality. Kirsch argues that this is false. The idea that VAERS
cannot show causality is part of how and why the CDC can claim none of the
deaths is attributable to the COVID shot.
To prove his point, Kirsch gives the
following analogy: Suppose you give a two-dose vaccine. After the first dose,
nothing happens, but after the second dose, people die within 24 hours of a
deep vein thrombosis (DVT). When you look at the VAERS data, what you would
find is no reports associated with the first dose, and a rash of deaths after
the second dose, and all within the same timeframe and with the same cause of
death.
According to the CDC, you cannot
ascribe any causality at all from that. To them, it’s just random chance that
everyone died after the second dose, and from the same condition, and not the
first dose or from another condition.
Kirsch argues that causality CAN be
identified from this kind of data. It’s very difficult to come up with another
explanation for why people die exactly 24 hours after their second dose.
For example, is it reasonable to assume
that people with, say, undiagnosed heart conditions would die exactly 24 hours
after getting a second dose of vaccine? Or that people with undiagnosed
diabetes would die exactly 24 hours after their second dose?
Why not after the first dose, or two
months after the second dose, or any other random number of hours or days, or
for other random cause of death? Why would people randomly die of the same
condition at the exact same time, over and over again?
VACCINE PROGRAM NEEDS TO BE HALTED IMMEDIATELY
According to Kirsch, the vaccination
program should be immediately halted, as the VAERS data suggest more than
200,000 Americans have already died, and more than 2 million have been
seriously injured by the vaccines. Interestingly enough, Kirsch and his entire
family took the COVID shot early on, so he’s not coming from an “anti-vax”
position.
Ending the vaccinations would not spell
disaster in terms of allowing COVID-19 to run rampant, as we now know there are
safe and effective early treatment protocols that everyone can use, both at
home and in the hospital. These treatments also work for all variants.
According to Kirsch, the CDC, the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health are all
“spreading misinformation about the vaccine versus early treatment.” In a
nutshell, these agencies are saying the complete opposite of what is true —
classic Orwellian doublespeak.
They claim the COVID shots are safe and
effective, when the data show they’re neither, and they say there is no safe
and effective early treatment, which is clearly false. At the same time, our
medical freedoms are being stripped away under the guise of public health — all
while an immense death toll is allowed to take place right before our eyes.
Kirsch is so confident in his analyses,
he’s offered a $1 million academic grant to anyone who can show his analysis is
flawed by a factor of four or more. So far, no one has stepped up to claim the
prize. He’s even offered $1 million to any official willing to simply have a
public debate with him about the data, and none has accepted the challenge.
As noted by Kirsch, “we’ve replaced
debates as a way to settle scientific disagreements … with government-driven
censorship and intimidation.” Medical recommendations are now also driven by
the White House rather than medical experts and doctors themselves.
FALSE NARRATIVES OVERVIEW
In this episode, Kirsch goes through
five false narratives about COVID jab safety, namely that:
1.The shots are safe and effective
2.No one has died from the COVID shot
3.You cannot use VAERS to determine
causality
4.The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is
harmless
5.Only a few adverse events are
associated with the shots and they’re all “mild”
He also reviews the five false
narratives about what the solutions are:
1.Vaccines are the only way to end the
pandemic
2.Vaccine mandates are therefore needed
3.Masks work
4.Early treatments do not work
5.Ivermectin is dangerous
COVID SHOT KILLS 5 TIMES MORE PEOPLE THAN IT SAVES
Kirsch cites information from Dr. PeterSchirmacher, chief pathologist at the University of Heidelberg, who is
recognized as one of the top 100 pathologists in the world.
Schirmacher did autopsies on 40
patients who died within two weeks of their COVID jab, and found 30% to 40% of
them were conclusively due to the shot, as there was no other underlying
pathology that could have caused the deaths. Now, he did not rule out that 100%
of the deaths could have been caused by the shots. He just could not
conclusively prove it.
There’s also Pfizer’s six-month study, which
included 44,000 people. During the blinded period of the study, the deaths were
just about even — 15 deaths in the vaccine group and 14 in the control group.
So, one life was saved by the shot.
But then, after the study was unblinded
and controls were offered the vaccine, another three in the original vaccine
group died along with two original placebo recipients who opted to get the
shot. None of these deaths was considered related to the Pfizer “vaccine,” yet
no one knows what they actually died from.
So, the final tally ended up being 20
deaths in the vaccine group and 14 deaths in the control group. What this tells
us is the Pfizer shot offers no all-cause mortality benefit. The shot saved one
life, and killed six, which gives us a net-negative mortality rate. The reality
is that five times more people are killed by the shot than are saved by it.
HOW TO CALCULATE EXCESS MORTALITY
In the video, Kirsch explains how
anyone can calculate the number of COVID shot deaths using VAERS data. What
we’re looking at here is excess deaths, not background deaths of people who
were going to die from a natural cause, such as old age, anyway. In summary,
this is done by:
1.Determining the propensity to report
2.Determining the number of domestic
deaths in the VAERS database
3.Determining the underreporting factor
for serious events
4.Determining the background death rate,
i.e., all deaths reported to VAERS by year
5.Calculating the number of excess deaths
Lastly, you would validate your
findings using independent methods or comparing it to what others have found.
Step-by-step instructions and calculations can be found in the document called
“Estimating the Number of Vaccine
Deaths in America.”3
MORE THAN 200,000 HAVE LIKELY BEEN KILLED BY THE JABS
Between the documentation on his
website and the video, you get a detailed in-depth understanding of how to do
this and how Kirsch came to the conclusions made. Here, I will simply provide a
summary rundown of Kirsch calculations and conclusions:
1.Propensity to report = same as in
previous years
2.Number of domestic deaths in the VAERS
database = 6,167 as of August 27, 2021
3.Under-reporting factor for serious
events = 41 (i.e., for every 41 events, only one is reported)
4.Background VAERS death rate = 500 per
year (this background death number will be subtracted twice, as most COVID jab
recipients are receiving two doses. This gives us a very conservative estimate)
5.Excess deaths calculation = (6,167 – 2
x 500) x 41 = 212,000 excess deaths
Using the same calculation methods,
Kirsch conservatively estimates more than 300,000 Americans have also been
permanently disabled by the COVID shots. These estimates have been validated by
four teams of researchers using other methods. (None of them used VAERS data.)
If you’re under the age of 50, your
risk of dying from the vaccine is greater than your chance of dying from
COVID-19.
Kirsch also demonstrates another
calculation to show the COVID shots kill more people than the actual COVID-19
infection does. That calculation also shows that if you’re under the age of 50,
your risk of dying from the vaccine is greater than your chance of dying from
COVID-19, so it makes no sense from a risk-benefit perspective to get the jab
if you’re younger than 50.
What’s more, since your risk of natural
infection exponentially decreases over time (as natural herd immunity grows,
your chance of infection approximately halves each year), the risks of the
COVID shot rapidly outgrow any potential benefit with each passing year.
EXAMPLES OF ADVERSE EVENTS
Kirsch has also analyzed adverse events
by symptom, calculating the rate at which they occur after the COVID shots
compared to the average rate seen for all other vaccines combined from 2015- to
2019 for ages 20 to 60. Here’s a sampling:4
Pulmonary embolism occurs at a rate
473 times higher than the normal incidence rate (i.e., if there was one
pulmonary embolism event reported in VAERS on average for all vaccines, there
were 473 events following a COVID injection)
Stroke, 326 times higher
Deep vein thrombosis 264.3 times
higher
Appendicitis 145.5 times higher
Parkinson's disease is 55 times higher
Blindness 29.1 times higher
Deafness 44.7 times higher
Death 58.1 times higher
Interestingly, the most common cause of
death in children aged 12 to 17 who got the COVID shot was pulmonary embolism.
This was determined by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices
(ACIP) after analyzing the deaths of 14 children. Coincidence? Or evidence of
causality?
ANECDOTES AND OTHER DATA CONSISTENT WITH HIGH DEATH RATE
Kirsch also cites anecdotal data that
can clue us in to what’s happening. One top neurologist claims to have 2,000
reportable vaccine injuries in 2021, compared to zero in the last 11 years.
In all, 5% of her existing patients now
have suspected vaccine injuries. Yet this neurologist has only reported two of
them because she got so frustrated with the VAERS system. So, in this
instance, the under-reporting rate is not 41, but 1,000. And she’s not alone.
This is another classic real-world illustration of what the PA Deborah Conrad
shared in yesterday’s article.
Canadian physician Dr. Charles Hoffe
has also reported that 60% of his COVID jabbed patients have elevated D-dimer
levels, which is indicative of blood clotting, and levels in many cases
remained elevated for up to three months.
This too is evidence of causation,
because your D-dimer level is a marker for blood clotting. Even if you don’t
have obvious symptoms of clotting, it can indicate the presence of micro clots.
Hoffe discusses this in the video below.
Dr. Peter McCullough has also reported
that troponin levels are elevated in many vaccinated patients. Troponin is a marker
for heart damage, such as when you’re having a heart attack or myocarditis
(heart inflammation). A level between 1 and 4 is indicative of an acute or
recent heart attack. In case of a serious heart attack, troponin can remain
elevated for five days.
In many patients who have received the
COVID jab, the troponin level is between 35 and 50(!) and remains at that level
for up to two months, which suggests massive damage is occurring to the heart.
Yet this is what they’re routinely labeling as “mild” myocarditis. There’s
absolutely nothing mild about this level of heart damage.
NO RATE OF INJURY OR DEATH IS TOO GREAT
Unbelievably, there seems to be no
ceiling above which the death and disability toll is deemed too great. Why
aren’t the FDA and CDC concerned about safety when more than half a million
side effect reports have been filed? How come nearly 15,000 reported deaths5 haven’t
set off emergency alarms and in-depth investigations? Historically, 50 deaths
have been the cutoff point at which a vaccine is pulled.
Considering the unprecedented risks of
these shots, I urge you to review as much data as you can before you jump on
the booster bandwagon. Based on everything I’ve seen, I believe the risk of
side effects is likely going to exponentially increase with each dose.
The CDC does not have the authority to 'give people a break' or not give people a break. We are a free people who can plainly see the harms of permitting an insular bureaucracy to dictate so many aspects of our lives these past two years. No one elected the @CDCDirector. https://t.co/JTbDrBH6wd
Marjorie Taylor Greene (@RepMTG) Calls Out Big Pharma & CDC Director For LYING About COVID-19 Vaccines To Get Billions From American Taxpayers.
“The government paid Pfizer & Moderna in 2020, 2021, and 2022
- Pfizer received $15.27 billion
- Moderna received $9.99 billion
Pfizer amazingly in 2022 got a 23% increase. But in 2021 they doubled their income. Doubled their income at a 95% increase in revenue. That's absolutely impressive thanks to the American people
But it was Moderna's whose numbers were astounding. Moderna increased their revenue.
- In 2020, had a 1,238% increase in revenue
- In 2021, they got a 2,200% increase in revenue
It's quite impressive though that Pfizer worldwide, worldwide went from at $190 billion right there towards the beginning of 2021 and skyrocketed at the end of 2021 to $330 billion worldwide
That's quite impressive. Thanks to the American taxpayer and thanks to the CDC Director, Doctor Rochelle Walensky who said that vaccines were safe and effective.”
