Monday, September 1, 2025

DR. TOM COWAN: The Real Cause of Heart Attacks and Strokes

that's not the cause of heart attacks. . . . but eventually that became clear that it has to be something to do with the heart and the brain, not the blood vessels.  --Dr. Tom Cowan 
    Diabetics have more heart attacks but less plaque.

9:25.  The story was they walked up Mount Tamalpais or Mount Monadinock with their wife.  They felt a little funny, they had a little chest pain.  The wife said you have to go to the cardiologist.  They go to the cardiologist.  He does a test and he says "You are 94% blocked.  If you block anymore, you're going to have a heart attack."  And I thought to myself if all the blood to your heart goes through these three arteries and you're 94% blocked, that means you have 6% blood flow to your heart how did you walk up Mount Tam?  And you mean if you block from 6% to 4% or 3%, that's going to kill you?  6% is 0% effectively.  You don't have any blood flow to your heart, so it doesn't matter if you block any more because you're already at zero or close.  So that was weird.  

So then I did the thing which you would think all doctors would do, but as far as I know I'm the only one who has done it, which is I said, "Okay, there must be studies that look at people who die of heart attacks and they do an autopsy on them, and they see how many of them have a blockage in the blood vessel leading to the part of their heart that had the heart attack."  Right?  If somebody says your sink is leaking, you go to call a plumber.  He looks at the pipe leading to your sink, and says "Nope, it's not blocked.  It's good.  It's not the pipe."  What I found was that when they started this heart attack theory, called the thrombosis theory that the cardiologists didn't believe it.  They said, no, it's got nothing to do with the blockages.  There's a robust blood flow through secondary collateral vessels. It's got nothing to do with blockages.  So I looked, and it turns out that there were a bunch of studies from the 1940s and '50s, '60s looking at the percentage of people who died of a heart attack.  So these are the worst of the worst, right?  They had a heart attack and they died.  Not everybody dies.  The highest number I found was 78% and the lowest number was 18% had a blockage which means that somewhere between 22% and 82% had no blockage in the area of the blood vessel leading to the part of the heart that had the attack.  So why did they die, like what happened to them?  Now even if you have 78% that doesn't mean that was there before the heart attack because then I read a book called the edopathogenesis of coronary artery disease or coronary heart disease by a pathologist name Giorgio Baraldi.  You can look up the book, and he studied people who died of heart attacks for 40 years with autopsies.  And he said, " 41% of them have a blocked artery leading to the part of the heart that died, and of those 41%, half of the blockages clearly came after the heart attack not before."  In other words, there was damage to the heart, like a dam there's damage to the river and you get backflow and build up of the debris in the river coming into the dam.  So we're talking 18% of the people had any blockage before the heart attack of the people who died and had an autopsy.  So that made me, being the reasonable person that I maybe, say, "that's not the cause of heart attacks."  Now at the time I didn't know what it was which is fine you don't have to know what's true in order to know what's not true.  That is a fundamental principle of logic, rational thinking, and supposedly science, even though most doctors have never heard of it.  But you don't know if somebody says, "Oh, I had video at a 7-Eleven, somebody was shot and killed and it was a man between 18 and 60 wearing jeans.  So you're under arrest."  You say well I wasn't there I was in Singapore, not Boston, and I have proof and you prove that you weren't there, etc.  And the guy says, "Until you prove to me who killed, tell me who killed the guy, you're under arrest."  Like that's ridiculous, right? Nobody would say that.  All you have to prove is that you weren't there.  And so we've proven that that's not the cause of heart attacks.  Now again, I didn't know what was, but eventually that became clear that it has to be something to do with the heart and the brain, not the blood vessels.  So it turns out that what happens is there's an imbalance in the energy generation in the heart and the heart goes what's called glycolytic which means it builds up acid just like if your muscle exceeds it's capacity like your leg you build up lactic acid and you get a cramp.  Why doesn't your leg have an attack?  Because your leg stops, and you flush the lactic acid out and then you go on your way.  Same thing happens in your heart.  Your heart isn't efficiently burning fuel, and so it uses accessory pathways to ferment, which means lactic acid, which causes cramps which we call angina.  The difference with your heart and your brain compared to the spleen and your liver and your foot is your heart and the brain can't stop.  So they keep going.  They build up more acid that causes a breakdown of the tissue, which is what we call a heart attack, and then the debris builds up up river,  which is why you get plaque build up upstream.  And all of the changes you see with every heart attack is accompanied by a drop in the pH, acidity, and it's come because there's damage to the organ.  Now that can come from a lot of reasons: bad food, emotions, EMFs, heavy metals, stress, decreased parasympathetic tone.  And decreased small vessel blood flow, which was one of the [reasons] that diabetics get more heart attacks, but they don't get more plaque, which is an "anomaly," which means it doesn't make sense.  But it does make sense if you realize that all the blood flow or 90 something percent is small vessel blood flow, not large vessels.  Diabetics get small vessel disease, and so that's why they get heart attacks.  

17:37.  Plaque it turns out is an adaptive response as is everything in the body.  That's the magic of thinking differently.  So a blood vessel is a protein tube that has fluid in it that is water based that we call blood.  Now it turns out that every time there is a hydrophilic tube, like protein and water that there is an interface between them, which forms a protective gel.  You can prove that absolutely.  Like you put a beaker of water and you suspend a horizontal hydrophilic tube, and the water will start moving in the tube because there's a gel that's formed on the inside of the tube that is negatively charged, and that pushes the positive charge into the water.  They repel and start moving, and it all has to do with the formation of this gel layer inside the tube.  So that happens in your arteries.  
And that gel layer protects your arteries and your blood vessels.  Now the gel layer is increased with things like sun exposure and Earthing, connection to the earth, and when somebody puts their hands on you, or when you're sitting next to your dog, at least most dogs, or thinking good thoughts.  And if you put yourself phone next to the speaker the gel layer stops forming and the velocity of the blood stops moving.  Now the question I asked myself, "If you are a body and your smart and you have a person who hasn't projected their arteries with this gel, because they never move, they're never out the sun, they never connected to the earth, they have bad relationships, they eat bad food, and their dog died. 

So, the body patches the weak vessels with plaque.  That is a brilliant strategy, because then it won't burst. Now, the doctors come along and say, "We're going to scrape off the plaque."  [Tom laughs.]  It's like, "Oh, you have a cracked pipe," and so you put some cement on it, so it won't break.  Doctor says, "I know the problem with why you don't have good water flow. It's because the cement is restricting the flow, so we're going to get rid of the cement."  What happens next?  It bursts.  So that's what happens or could happen.  So the body doesn't want to, so it makes plaque.  Now that does have a problem.  Just like your pipe, you will get less blood flow through there.  But what are you going to do? The guy doesn't go out in the sun.  He doesn't eat good food.  He's got toxic relations.  You got no choice, so you do the next best thing you can, which is to make plaque.  

MILA JOY: D.O.G.E. has removed 11 MILLION scammers from the Social Security system so far.

TOM LUONGO: this time you're going to work for the United States that's not interested in being the global hegemon because that's a British game. That's a Dutch game. That's a Belgian/Luxembourg game.

9:06  All corners were seeing it from the Usual Suspects over at Davos, and the City of London, who are screaming bloody murder that Trump is fixing all of these open wounds and Gordian Knots geopolitically they have around the world. He is rebalancing trade.  He's defending the United States, and they're all like, "You can't do! That that's unfair!  You're the big bully!" and then, you know, like, "Yeah, and . . . ?  That's nice." Like, I'm just channeling Donald Trump at this point, "Yeah, and . . . ?  F*** you.  You stole from us you literally stole elections bought or used our tax money to buy our politicians to prosecute your monetary policy and your fiscal policy and your foreign policy to prop up your failing anti-democratic systems over in Europe, your Colonial adventurism that you are continuing to do France in Sahel region of Africa, Britain in the Middle East, or this one or that one, and on top of everything else, you were you f****** children."  And you were running drugs and you were invading and you were paying people to invade our border to come in and use quislings that you had hired in our government to then pay for these people to the tunes of billions of dollars a year, more than what we were paying the people who built this country, who are currently on Social Security like that it was going on. That's over.  None of this globalist nonsense: IMF is not taking over the global monetary system; the SDR is not coming; the BRICS are never going to issue their own freaking currency.  None of that is coming.  What's coming is the tokenization of assets backed by local treasuries treasury stable coins of some form or another either the United States is going to have their own, or Russia is going to have theirs, China is going to have theirs. Everybody is going to have theirs, and most of the trade is going to be denominated, the receipts are all going to be paid in dollars and we're going to wrap treasuries in Stablecoins and we're going to transmit all that along public blockchains and the central banks are all going to be destroyed, or they're going to have to get with the program, and that includes our Federal Reserve.  So that's what's happening.  Like all of that old shit is so 2015, and it is still out there in the zeitgeist muddying up the conversation space.  And worse than that, it's actually wrong for the United States to defend itself after having been hollowed out for the last 80 years of everybody literally pulling a piece off the corpse.  Like we're not dead.  You just thought we were dead because we were playing dead.  I don't know because you are anesthetized us?  Do I have to extend the metaphor?  Then I got news for you, then our livers kicked in and the anesthesia wore off and we're like, "What the f*** did this . . . how the fuck did this happen? Yeah, no."  How about no.  We are not going to war with Russia, we're not doing this.  We're not going to war for Israel in Iran.  We're not doing any of this stuff, and you all work for us again.  But this time you're going to work for the United States that's not interested in being the global hegemon because that's a British game.  That's a Dutch game.  That's a Belgian/Luxembourg game.  

The above is an excerpt of this interview.

STEPHANIE SENEFF: This is the first time I've seen somebody else besides me say that glyphosate may be a causal factor in the increase in forest fires we've been witnessing in the past decade. Glyphosate is a desiccant.

Thank you to Wejolyn

SAMA HOOLE: Why Beef Destroys Chicken Nutritionally Speaking