“According to researchers, over a third of all cellular magnesium is found in mitochondria, and various cellular processes rely on this mineral to function. When magnesium mitochondrial homeostasis is disrupted, ATP (adenosine triphosphate) production becomes compromised and…
— Wejolyn 🇺🇸 (@Wejolyn) September 18, 2024
GET NUTRITION FROM FARM-DIRECT, CHEMICAL-FREE, UNPROCESSED ANIMAL PROTEIN. SUPPLEMENT WITH VITAMINS. TAKE EXTRA WHEN NECESSARY
Thursday, September 19, 2024
DR. MERCOLA: According to researchers, over a third of all cellular magnesium is found in mitochondria, and various cellular processes rely on this mineral to function.
PETER ST ONGE: Many more suits are coming, perhaps tens of thousands given there are roughly half a million federal regulations almost none of which were actually authorized by Congress.
The administrative state is unraveling as hundreds of unconstitutional rules are being challenged after the Loper Bright decision.
— Peter St Onge, Ph.D. (@profstonge) September 19, 2024
Rules range from SEC mandates and anti-farming rules to transgender mandates and citizenship for migrants.
The left, gloriously, is panicking. pic.twitter.com/4GFbFWyUTh
Some rare good news as left-wing mouthpiece, Politico, worries a recent Supreme Court decision will be "abused" to erase the "legacy of the Biden Harris nightmare." The decision in question of course is June's Loper v. Bright case that gutted Chevron Deference, as it said that major regulations actually have to be passed by Congress, not by unelected Deep State bureaucrats. This is because the Constitution very clearly states that Congress, who works for the people in theory, is supposed to make laws, not random bureaucrats who indisputably work for themselves.
Source: Article I, Section I of the U.S. Constitution.
Loper Bright gutted a "cornerstone of progressive policymaking their ability to sneak laws in through the administrative state and running voters," which, fun fact, converts democracy into tyranny. So what's upsetting Politico is that if Congress is supposed to make the rules, it turns out the vast majority of rules in existence at the moment were not made by Congress. They just sort of spawned from the moist bowels of the deep state. Politico is upset that "small government conservatives are suing to eliminate these apparently unconstitutional mandates." Worse for them, in a separate Supreme Court case Corner Post said that "there is no statute of limitations to challenging unconstitutional regulations," meaning they're all at risk even the old ones. So which moist spawnings in particular are at risk? Well, we're only two and a half months into Loper Bright and such things do move slowly, but we've already seen a Mississippi judge void transgender mandates; a Texas judge block an unconstitutional non-compete ban; and an Ohio appeals court block a rule regulating internet companies. Another Texas judge struck down so-called "parole in place" that puts illegals on a path to citizenship. They struck it down specifically because the rule "illegally bypassed Congress." Others involve former mandates, small business mandates, manufacturing, abortion benefits, price controls, and, of course, the Biden-Harris student loan bailouts that would make blue collars pay for other people's gender degrees. None of these were actually voted by Congress, meaning they are all gloriously unconstitutional. In theory, Congress could turn around and actually pass the rules, replacing bureaucratic diktat with clean law. In reality, almost no federal rules are actually popular; that's why Congress passes the buck in the first place. So in all likelihood, the vast majority of mandates that are struck down will stay down. Democrats know this and being the party of the administrative state they realize that even if cackles gets the White House they are losing the game. The activist industrial complex is being dethroned. Some major suits have already been filed, one to dismantle a massive market surveillance system run by the SEC. Other challenges a raft of "conservation measures on small farms that would drive them out of business." Many more suits are coming, perhaps tens of thousands given there are roughly half a million federal regulations almost none of which were actually authorized by Congress. As each mandate melts away, the economy gets stronger and the space for Liberty expands how you run your farm, how you run your business, earn a living, and how you educate your children. It may not feel like it, but we are winning. Thanks to the Constitution, things will get worse before they get better but we're turning the corner thanks to some very brave men 200 years ago and the greatest constitution in history that they left us.
Wednesday, September 18, 2024
SOLZHENITSYN: Should one point out that from ancient times declining courage has been considered the beginning of the end?
Owen Benjamin on societal collapse echoes Solzhenitsyn on the destruction of communism.
Thread by @JeremyTate41 on Solzhenitsyn https://t.co/plfhYW5fbU
— Tom Luongo (Head Sneetch) (@TFL1728) September 18, 2024
Excellent interview of Graeme MacQueen by James Corbett covering Graeme’s book on the October 2001 anthrax attacks
Here’s a good interview of Graeme MacQueen by James Corbett covering Graeme’s book on the October 2001 anthrax attacks. https://t.co/4LG0hjNlP5 pic.twitter.com/IJmf74DnE1
— Kevin Ryan (@KevinRyan911) September 18, 2024
Wow. Ryan provides Graeme MacQueen's book, The 2001 Anthrax Deception: The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy, here at The International Center for 9/11 Justice.
23:00. We often think of September 2001 as a crucial time. I t was. That's when the 9/11 attacks happened. But October 2001 in a way is just as important. That's when the bombing in Afghanistan begins. That's when very overt preparation begins for attacking Iraq. That's when the PATRIOT Act is passed. That's when the NSA as we know now begins mass spying on US citizens. That's when the anthrax attacks happen. So as you said earlier, it's not just a matter of September, these events were drawn out over the fall. That's the leading hypothesis up until the PATRIOT Act that was signed into law on the 26th of October. And George Bush when he gives his little speech justifying the PATRIOT Act on that day, he refers to 9/11 and he refers to the anthrax attack and his speech assumes that they were done by the same group or at least related group with extremists. But rapidly after the Patriot Act is passed the narrative begins to crumble and one of the reasons it begins to crumble is because of hard science on those who look at the spores it seems clear that some of the people who examined the anthrax spores had not been fully brought into this fraud. They're saying, you know, I'm sorry but this looks like an American product. This looks like it comes from our own domestic programs, not just American but from US military and intelligence, and that really quite rapidly becomes accepted for very specific reasons. By the end of the year, by the end of December 2001, all the frauds meant to frame Al-Qaeda and Iraq have crumbled. There is a group that continues to kind of revive those theories from time to time over the next year but the main consensus, and that includes the FBI, it includes Homeland Security, it includes the White House, is that somehow this has come from within our own biological weapons program, and at that point the FBI goes into damage control mode and tries to create these narratives of a lone nut somehow and eccentric, dangerous, possibly mentally unbalanced individual in our system had done these attacks. And if that's true, of course, it tells us really nothing.
27:35 Apparently there was a 2005 civil case filed by the family of Robert Stevens, 62, died on October 5, 2001, the first victim of the anthrax attacks, and that case actually provoked the Department of Justice to issue a summary for a motion of judgment, wanting to dismiss the case.
[A summary judgment is when a civil court rules in favor of one party over the other without a full trial. When a party files for a summary judgment, they are then referred to as the "Moving Party." Two requirements: first, the parties to the lawsuit have to agree to the material facts, the facts that are important to the legal decision. Second, the law must say these undisputed facts entitle the "Moving Party" to a judgment. The evidence must be admissible. The judge can only look at what is allowed by the evidence code. Your testimony and that of a key witness are down on paper. The witness has to sign the evidence on paper in front of a notary, called an affidavit. Both you and your opponent can bring affidavits. Written arguments are called Memorandum.]
Tuesday, September 17, 2024
ABBY JOHNSON: wasn't prepared for what happened with her at-home abortion by pill
I WANT MY BABY BACK
— David Knight Show LIVE 9am EST, M-F (@libertytarian) September 17, 2024
…she wasn't prepared for what happened with the at-home, abortion by pill. pic.twitter.com/VkFnASLdxW
I talked yesterday about the Emergency Room visits and how they had four cohorts of people in this study, and when they looked at serious Emergency Room visits and how they had increased over 11 years. Serious Emergency visits increased for everybody. Unfortunately, that's a tale about what is happening to us as a society with our food and drugs; that's really coming from the FDA, that's a war against our health. But Emergency Room visits went up. It went up like 20% for women who had babies. For women who were not even pregnant, it went up 100%.
And it went up 400% + for women who had surgical abortions, four times as much.
And then it went up over 4,000% for women who had abortions with a pill. It's a very dangerous thing. They're now allowing women to take this abortion pill without seeing a physician. And the other side of this is that when the women have abortions, they see the baby that comes out, and that was the experience of this woman. She went to social media, she showed two photos of her 10-week-old deceased baby. 20 minutes ago she said,
I had a medical abortion at home by the pill, and it was the most painful thing that I have ever gone through.
You know, Abby Johnson, who was head of the Planned Parenthood murder joint in Houston, Texas, she had, she's now a big opponent of it, but she had when she was still working there, she had . . . they casually gave her an abortion pill and she took it. Took it with her and went home with it. She said she thought she was going to die. There was nobody there to help her. She'd not been warned about how bad it was but she talked at length about that. But she said,
the most painful thing that she's ever gone through, and I'm so sorry "Little Bean," she called the baby "Bean." "Bean" was moving its legs and heart, and his heart was still beating when he came out in one push.
She said,
first, my water broke, then another push later, the baby came out quite quickly along with big clots. I immediately felt relief so I grabbed a glove and finished in the toilet, and the baby was in there. As soon as I pulled the baby out, the legs were moving and I could feel the heartbeat in my hand. The heartbeat slowly faded and stopped moving.
She watched the baby die in her hand.
So she said,
the most traumatic thing I've ever experienced. I feel like I wasn't given all the information I needed going into it. I was told it would feel like a period, but my experience was much worse. Definitely the most pain I've ever felt in my whole life, and I wished that I'd had been prepared for it.
See, they lie to women, and they don't even do an exam to tell them if the baby is too big, if it's going to cause complications, or whatever.
She also said,
I literally gave birth and nobody told me that it would be like that. The contractions were so intense it was unbearable. About 15 minutes before it was out, I started telling my partner to call someone because I couldn't handle it anymore.
Abby Johnson was by herself. People she worked with, Planned Parenthood, "Ah, no big deal. Here, take a pill."
I was not informed that the fetus would be whole, so I was quite shocked when it came out. I don't think I was prepared well enough for the entire experience. I feel like they sugar-coated all of it to make it seem easy, but it was one of the hardest things I'd ever been through.
The common man. They created Common Core to dumb down our children. They created a common pass to track and control us. Their Commons Project to make sure that commoners own nothing in a communist future. They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, and ordinary, but each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God. That is what we have in common. That is what they want to take away. Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, and intimidation. They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us. It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.