Saturday, May 6, 2023

George Soros was a shareholder of FOX News

How come the United Kingdom is left out of every story geopolitically?  Somehow, they're like the hidden hand that nobody ever talks about anymore.

First, we know what just happened with Tucker at Fox, and there's a slight parallel in history that might give us some insight.

POE, 00:53: Well, back in 2013, Glenn Beck did a 3-part series called The Puppet Master, exposing George Soros, and shortly after he was kicked off Fox News.  Dan Bongino's show closed, and shortly after Tucker Carlson's, and both of them had been going after George Soros quite a bit.  

Dan Bognino's content manager is Matt Palumbo, author of The Man Behind the Curtain: Inside the Secret Network of George Soros, February 2022.  He's been pushing that book quite a lot, he's been going on shows, and his boss Bongino has been very supportive.  This begs the question, is the shutting down of Beck, Carlson, and Bongino the result of the hidden hand of Soros in conjunction with the hidden hand of the UK?  Are they one in the same?

Settlement for the Dominion lawsuit.  

Dominion is in cahoots with Smartmatic in this whole election thing.  Smartmatic, originally a Venezuelan company, was bought up by a British consortium whose CEO was Mark Molloch-Brown, a long-time friend and collaborator of George Soros who now is president of Soros' Open Society Foundations.  So it's a tight little world, and in this tight little world we have a lot of nefarious UK-connected figures.  

MEL, 4:20 Rupert Murdoch is vehemently opposed to ever seeing Trump back in office.  Staple Street owns Dominion now.  The guys who started Staple Street are Carlyle Group guys, which connects back to Bush, Cheney, and once again it's the small neocon intel group who have collaborated in some way.  Money changed hands.  It looks like a merger of the one-party rule crowd, billionaire elite class capture of America.  

5:40, POE, Soros was a shareholder of Fox News.  He certainly was when the Glenn Beck show was on at Fox.  That affected me directly because the Puppet Masters series that Glenn Beck did was based on my book, The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and 60s Radicals Sieized Control of the Democratic Party, 2010, which I co-wrote with David Horowitz.  Even after the Puppet Master, Glenn continued having me on his show repeatedly, talking about Soros and all kinds of related subjects.  So it was definitely a big blow to me when Glenn got kicked off, and anyone else who wants to know the truth about these subjects.  I do remember that that was one of the issues that Soros bought into Fox News, so I haven't followed that.  I don't know if he's still a shareholder.  The thing about Soros, from all my research which goes back to the early 90s, everything that I have learned about him continues to support my contention that he is a British asset, certainly an agent of influence for the British Foreign Office.  Whether he is formerly an asset for other British agencies or institutions, I can't say or I can't prove, but it is very clear that he is an instrument of British Foreign Policy, consciously and formerly so, due to his . . . well, the British Foreign Office has a formal program; it's public, it's not a secret.  But they take UK alumni, such as Soros, who've graduated from UK universities, reach out to them, monitor them, maintain communication with them, and basically try to get them to network with other UK alumni for the rest of their lives.  And those who become prominent, like Mr. Soros, are recruited to help advance British foreign policy agendas.  Again this is not some secret.  I read this in a white paper from the British Foreign Office in 2015.  It describes this program in great detail and very proudly announces in their humble opinion that the UK is the world's greatest "soft power" as they put it, directly because of this program of recruiting foreign students to study in the UK, as young George Soros did, and then following them throughout their lives.  


Novak Djokovic reflects on the trauma of NATO bombing his childhood home in 1999

From 2008 to 2014, 14,000 Russians in the Donbass have been killed

Russia launched an operation it felt it had to secure its country.  We had been working tirelessly for at least the last 20 years to undermine and weaken Russia in whatever way possible.  We decided that we didn't care very much for Mr. Putin and his success at retrieving Russia from the ash heap of history.  And then the Russians made it very clear that they would not accept NATO on its borders.  Effectively, they'd done that with Latvia and Estonia, but they made it very clear that Ukraine, which is roughly the size of Texas in the United States, could never be a member of NATO.  That it presented too much of a danger.  They made that clear in 2008 in Budapest.

Once the Russians invaded Ukraine, they made the mistake that they expected someone would negotiate with them.  They went in with a really small force, no more than 90,000 on the ground, and they discovered after 2 or 3 months, 4 months, even though they were not taking heavy casualties, they discovered that they weren't going to get a negotiated settlement.  Finally, the [Russian] generals met with Putin last summer and said that this is a war.  This is not what we bargained for, we miscalculated, the underlying assumptions were wrong, there is no one to talk to.  They realized they had to get ready for a real war, which meant mobilizing reserves, expanding the size of the army, training everybody up, and re-equipping people because the equipment they used initially was almost all obsolescent.  So that was completed by Christmas.  Then there was pressure to launch an offensive, but the weather didn't cooperate, so the decision was made, since we don't have firm ground, and you'll recall that in that part of the world we have this thing called Rasputitsa, which is effectively a sea of mud that makes it virtually impassable for armored fighting vehicles or wheeled vehicles.  If you leave the hard-surfaced road, you're in big trouble.  If you go back to WWII, you'll find that the major offensives were either launched in the dead of winter when the ground was frozen or they were launched in June, July, August, or September.  So the Russians then said, fine, we'll build an impregnable defense, hold what we got, and invite the Ukrainians to attack us.  And in the meantime, Ukrainians have taken terrible, terrible losses.  These losses have never been truthfully reported in the Western media because Washington was very concerned that if it became clear that Ukrainians were dying in great numbers, their forces almost being destroyed faster than they could be fielded, the support for this insane notion for waging a proxy war on the backs of Ukrainian people against Russia would no longer be supported in NATO.  So the easy solution was lie.  And then you have a compliant media which is ideologically aligned with the globalist neocon governments, especially in Washington and London, then it becomes very easy to tailor the message to somehow or another to sustain support.  And remember, Russia still has the legacy of the Cold War behind it, and what that means is that it's easy to convince people that Russians are bad, Russians are evil.  After all, wasn't the Soviet Union bad or evil?  Of course, this is not the Soviet Union.  This country today is radically different.  If anything, it is extremely religious, culturally conservative, and I think the Russian military, contrary to what's being reported in the Western media, has behaved extraordinarily well, is not guilty of 90% of the war crimes of which it's being accused.  On the other hand, the Ukrainian military has behaved atrociously

11 million + Ukrainians have left the country, and they have no intention of going back to Ukraine.  Haven't begun to traffick children and women.  The squandering of cash that ends up in places like Cyprus, belonging to people like Zelensky and key people in his operation, including generals in the Ukranian Army even down to the battalion level.   This is a disaster and we should put a stop to it right away and try to rescue as much of Ukraine as we can.  

Thanks to Alex Krainer.

Friday, May 5, 2023

The decline of San Francisco is alarming

There Are Concerns that the Vaccines Can Cause Blindness. Take the necessary precaution with the right nutrients and supplements

This is important to know with regard to the risks of blindness: 

The risk was found to be highest in the first few weeks after vaccination but could last for up to 12 weeks.

Furthermore, the incidence of retinal vascular occlusion was significantly higher in those who received the vaccine after 2 years, with an overall hazard ratio of 2.19. This means that vaccinated persons are 2 times more likely to be inflicted with blindness. 

Additionally, 12 weeks after being vaccinated, the potential for blindness was higher for all ages.

The research also revealed that individuals who had received the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines had a significantly increased risk of developing retinal vascular occlusion 2 years after vaccination.

It is important to note that the risk of blindness caused by the vaccine did not vary based on the brand or dose of the vaccine. This means that all COVID-19 vaccines were associated with this side effect.

Here is where it gets insane: 

Despite the risks, the paper still recommends people to be vaccinated, referencing the 14.4 million excess deaths prevented by the vaccine and "the lack of definite causation between retinal vascular occlusion and vaccinations." 

https://hbnshow.com/new-research-shows-a-way-to-preserve-your-precious-eyesight/


This caught my eyeLooks like Longevinex halts macular degeneration 4 years in advance before it occurs. 

We also discussed zinc as prevention for the 3 major causes of death. Molecular Multi contains an excellent form of zinc in the effective dose not found in other multis. *The form of Vitamin B6 that he mentioned as being in his multi is Pyridoxal-5-Phoshate.