Prosecutors asked a judge to incarcerate a woman nearly beaten to death by DC metro police on January 6.
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) February 11, 2023
Her crime? Meeting with GOP lawmakers to discuss her case and deaths of 4 Trump supporters that day.
Judge Bates didn’t jail her but gave warning… https://t.co/vwxA6He5sy
GET NUTRITION FROM FARM-DIRECT, CHEMICAL-FREE, UNPROCESSED ANIMAL PROTEIN. SUPPLEMENT WITH VITAMINS. TAKE EXTRA WHEN NECESSARY
Saturday, February 11, 2023
Prosecutors asked a judge to incarcerate a woman nearly beaten to death by DC metro police on January 6. Her crime? Meeting with GOP lawmakers to discuss her case and deaths of 4 Trump supporters that day.
MISS THIS AT YOUR PERIL. "Public health has been militarized, and the military has been turned into a public health front or a Potemkin Village such that they are using public health language and public health laws to actually carry out a military campaign."
Their weapons are 1) informational, that's the propaganda piece and the censorship piece, 2) psychological, that's the fear and terrorism piece, telling people they need to be afraid all the time and need to listen to the government, and 3) the third piece is the chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons which are called in their campaign pharmaceuticals, vaccines but are actually toxins and pathogens.
World Health Organization, W.H.O., which is not a health organization, it's a military organization. It's sort of the military arm of the One World Government that they're trying to set up.
Be sure to listen and read/see the 8:47 mark.
Listen Carefully.
— Champagne Joshi (@JoshWalkos) February 11, 2023
Visit Katherine’s Substack for details. https://t.co/BVUMcNZ1CJ
Credit: A Warrior Calls on Rumble pic.twitter.com/ArgPp2aY3Y
On January 24, 2023, a press conference took place to discuss the ongoing military deployment of bioweapons. One of the attendees was Katherine Watt, a Pennsylvania paralegal and law researcher. Here are her findings in her own words.
Public health has been militarized, and the military has been turned into a public health front or a Potemkin Village such that they are using public health language and public health laws to actually carry out a military campaign. And I would not call them DoD vaccines; I would call them DoD weapons. They call it a Kill Box because the first lead that I had was Todd Callender's January 30, 2022 interview with Tuscon, Arizona doctor, Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet. FYI, a kill box is a weaponry term that refers to "a three-dimensional target area, defined to facilitate the integration of coordinated joint weapons fire." A military term for defining geographical space, or three-dimensional area, for a military attack by air and by surface to kill people who are in it, and to dismantle the framework and move onto the next campaign.
She's referring to this interview here:
Pfizer stated prototypes are not required to go through safety and efficacy testing or clinical trials or FDA authorization.
October 4, 2022, the U.S. government filed a statement of interest in support of Pfizer's motion to dismiss the claim that they were acting outside standard regulatory practices when it comes to vaccine distribution.
Basically saying that clinical trials were never material or necessary for DOD to pay the contractors for producing or distributing the bioweapons known as COVID-19 vaccines. And so all of this became visible from 2020 to the present when the W.H.O. President, Secretary General issued the Public Health Emergency of International Concern at the end of January 2020 and the HHS Secretary immediately triggered the domestic framework through the determination that a public health emergency exists, followed by PREP Act declarations for medical countermeasures, which are the weapons [the vaccines].
Health & Human Services Violates existing U.S. Law by stating that a public health emergency exists.
And then Congress and presidents, Trump and Biden, pass several additional Congressional acts and funding, reinforcing the structure of the kill box.
Trump and Biden passed declarations, acts, and legislation and opened up a funding stream reinforcing and incentivizing the kill box.
And issued more executive orders under the Defense Production Act, the Stafford Act, and the National Emergencies Act to sort of build out the program. Basically what it built was a huge private/public funding stream for military bioweapons research and use. It eliminated informed consent by reclassifying people who could be potentially carrying disease as presumptive national security threats so that you can do anything you want to them because you're on a war footing.
private/public funding stream for military-led experiments on humans.
Who knew? We are under martial law.
eliminated informed consent by reclassifying healthy humans as biohazards or threats to national security.
But how is national security even a thing anymore if the W.H.O., an international entity is enforcing these measures? Because the sovereign countries adopt these measures per the W.H.O.
State of Emergency is considered a war footing.
By whom?
Under current "legal" framework supported by continuation of emergency declarations all liability for private interests and government harms is shielded from investigation or prosecution.
Gee, how do Rand Paul and Thomas Renz, and Dr. Richard Fleming get around this one?
And to shield products and weapons from product liability, to shield all the people involved from criminal liability and from civil liability, and to shield the government funders, developers, and regulators from criminal prosecution under the other . . . that are in place, that are superseded by this framework for use of bioweapons, for use of chemical weapons, terrorism, things like that.
I see this as a joint project between the U.S. Department of Defense, the coordinating committee of the Central Banks, W.H.O., and BIS. And the U.N., but the World Health Organization is like a subsidiary of the UN.
And, there are things that globalists do not like. They don't like constitutions, the charters. They don't like the conflicting statutory frameworks around war crimes, bioterrorism, torture, . . . They don't like any of that stuff. They don't like when states or provinces, counties or towns pass their own laws protecting informed consent, protecting people for their continued safety. They actually put out a report in October 2022: state laws limiting public health protections hazardous for our health. And there's a whole bunch of things that states have started doing that globalists do not like, so doing more of those things, bringing more control back to the states, using more of Article 10 of the Constitution to reclaim state authority . . . those are all extremely useful. I do think it's going to break. I do think there's going to be a tipping point and the criminal prosecutions are going to start. And we have all the evidence, and every time they try to answer what we're talking about by saying "national security," they reinforce this is the right way to go. This is what they're doing: they're committing war crimes.
DR. BRYAN ARDIS ON REMDESIVIR: "That's because the virus wasn't doing it."
In May 2020 Dr Fauci lied about the 2019 Remdesivir Ebola trial in Africa and he lied about
— RefugeOfSinners (ROS) (@RefugeOfSinner5) February 11, 2023
the 3 month Remdesivir Covid trial March 2020.
It was approved.
Then Drs in New York said,
"We have never seen this amount of acute kidney failure when we treat a respiratory virus"
Hmmm pic.twitter.com/uqIAPoIEbj
Friday, February 10, 2023
Does the State Department fund Coronavirus research in China? The answer's yes, you do, and it's been going on for more than a decade.
Gain of function research is a death cult, full stop. The US state department and the NIH are funding it, period. Any questions? https://t.co/9Bd2VulCf8
— Aaron Kheriaty, MD (@akheriaty) February 10, 2023
Ms. Sherman, it's estimated that between five and eighteen million people died from COVID-19 worldwide. To a significant number of scientists, the evidence suggests that this originated from a lab leak in Wuhan. Does the State Department fund Coronavirus research in China?
Do we fund coronavirus? I don't believe so, but I don't know. I'll double-check and we'll get back to you on that senator.
The answer's yes, you do, and it's been going on for more than a decade. It's done through a program called PREDICT, and then the Global Virom Project. And why this is important is that we've had 1 million Americans dying of this, and we've had no discussion of this. No hearings, nothing. People are unaware that they're even funding the research. We found out recently through the House Unclassified Report, that money is going from the NIH to American Universities to the Academy of Military Medical Sciences Research in China. We are subcontracting money and sending it over, but millions of it is coming from the State Department. So the idea is this: we'll identify all the viruses in the world, and we'll be safer because we've identified them. But here's the question, are we safer to have some guy or some woman crawling down a cave, 10 hours away from bat guano, coming up with viruses, and bringing it to a city of 15 million, like Wuhan. This is what's been going on for a decade. It's a set-up for an accident, it's a set-up for a mistake. And nobody's doing anything about it. We continue to fund it. The main group that's been getting this money is EcoHealth Alliance, over $100 million dollars, a lot of it through the State Department. They continue to get money. They don't file their reports on time. They didn't stop their experiments, and yet we reward them with more money. 15 million people died and we haven't done a thing about it. Nobody seems to care. We're not even sure we fund it. The State Department is a big funder of this project. It's a multi-decades-long project, but there are scientists as we speak from Standford, from MIT, from prestigious universities around the country. These are not partisans. Most of these are not Republicans, who stand up and say, "Oh, my God, what are we doing, bringing these viruses from remote bat caves to major metropolitan areas with no controls over this. So we've been asking for information from the State Department
The FBI paid Twitter over $3.4 million of taxpayer dollars to censor stories –
The FBI paid Twitter over $3.4 million of taxpayer dollars to censor stories – including the Hunter Biden laptop story.
— Rep. Elise Stefanik (@RepStefanik) February 9, 2023
53% of Americans made aware of the Hunter Biden laptop story would have changed their vote in 2020.
This is unconstitutional election meddling. pic.twitter.com/9Z26pM22Kf