"It didn't work. I hated it!"

'It didn't work, I hated it!' Jamie Lee Curtis, 62, details plastic surgery regrets https://t.co/jAAWC0634q

— Daily Mail Online (@MailOnline) October 12, 2021

Israel has volunteered its citizens to be a part of an ongoing experiment without any informed consent.

Here are the show notes.  

Israelis are not easily able to learn about the side effects of the COVID vaccines, because the government is making it very difficult to share stories. https://t.co/UjfQcS5i0U

— Stephanie Seneff (@stephanieseneff) October 12, 2021

"Concerns about the safety and efficacy of [Moderna's] products . . . evaporated in the wave of panic surrounding COVID-19 . . ."

A fascinating and disturbing article about Moderna and its shady past.  https://t.co/IEFH8imun3

— Stephanie Seneff (@stephanieseneff) October 9, 2021

A few highlights from the damning article on Moderna. 

As STAT noted in 2016, the people who were tasked with making “the science work” were those who most frequently resigned, which led to Moderna losing two heads of chemistry within a single year, followed shortly by losing its chief scientific officer and its head of manufacturing. Many top executives, including the heads of its cancer research and rare disease research branches, ended up lasting fewer than eighteen months in their respective positions. The abrupt resignations weren’t exclusive to Moderna’s science-focused executive positions either, as the chief information officer and top financial executive roles were also affected. Bancel ultimately sought advice from the human resources departments of Facebook, Google, and Netflix on employee retention. 

It looks like all of these biotech companies are overvalued, and so find some way to connect themselves with military intelligence for a Hail Mary rescue.  And clearly, the last thing on the minds of these corporate assholes is the well-being of those receiving their toxic products.  

Arguably, the most critical difference between Moderna and Theranos is that Moderna, whose numerous issues and challenges only came to light after the collapse of Theranos had begun, has never faced the same degree of scrutiny from the US government or mainstream investigative journalists. There are many possible reasons for this, including Moderna’s close relationship with the US Department of Defense through the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), or concern that its exposure post-Theranos would bring scrutiny to any company existing at the intersection of Silicon Valley and the health-care industry. However, such a reckoning would likely have been inevitable for Moderna had it not been for the COVID-19 crisis, which could not have come at a more convenient time for the company.  

Anytime you see a company joining forces with the military, think of democide.  Given how Americans are in love with their military and fawn over the image of one of their soldiers, dead or alive, it's hard for Americans to perceive contradictions, a conflict of interest, or something more sinister.  It's apple pie, hotdogs, and Chevrolet.   

MODERNA'S "SOFTWARE" ENCOUNTERS BUGS

Many of the problems with Moderna that Garde identified in 2016 continued to plague the company right up until the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis. Chief among these was Moderna’s struggle to prove that its technology worked and that it was safe. Concerns about the safety and efficacy of the company’s products, which were publicly reported beginning in 2017, evaporated in the wave of panic surrounding COVID-19 and the simultaneous “Warp Speed” race for a vaccine that would “end the pandemic.” Yet, there is little, if any, evidence that these once-well-recognized concerns were addressed prior to the US government’s emergency use authorization of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine and its now widespread use in many countries around the world. To the contrary, there is evidence that these concerns were covered up both prior to and during the development of its vaccine. 

I just don't see how this can be good for the American consumer. 

A few weeks later, Moderna’s Bancel  attended the World Economic Forum’s 2019 annual meeting alongside Johnson & Johnson executive Paul Stoffels and other pharmaceutical and biotech leaders in order to “rub elbows with world leaders and one-percenters—and talk about the future of healthcare.” Other healthcare figures in attendance included the head of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, and “global health philanthropist” Bill Gates, whose foundation entered into “a global health project framework” with Moderna in 2016 to “advance mRNA-based development projects for various infectious diseases.” The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the only foundation listed as a “strategic collaborator” on the Moderna website. Other “strategic collaborators” include the US government’s Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), the US military’s DARPA, and pharmaceutical giants AstraZeneca and Merck.

It should be noted that John Hopkins University is integrally involved in the great vaccine rollout, running cover for and with DARPA.  Unlimited Hangout explains it thus:

The simulation was a collaborative effort led by the John Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies (part of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security) in collaboration with the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the Analytic Services (ANSER) Institute for Homeland Security and the Oklahoma National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism. The concept, design and script of the simulation were created by Tara O’Toole and Thomas Inglesby of the Johns Hopkins Center along with Randy Larsen and Mark DeMier of ANSER. The full script of the exercise can be read here. 

What this tells me is that John Hopkins has been involved in military biowarfare since at least 9/11.  The planes crashing into the Twin Towers is the least of our worries, if you have all these american institutions coordinating an effort to poison millions of Americans.  And to what end?  Some have argued that just as the Nazis backpacked through Europe stealing the wealth of its citizens there, that the military intelligence assets are trying to steal the assets of Americans.  

 

 

Fake Facebook Whistleblower, Frances Haugen, Accuses Facebook for Betraying Democracy While Calling for More Censorship of Conservative Views

Facebook is very much part of the system, or establishment if you prefer.  Facebook was born of the CIA's program, LifeLog.  Talk about your total surveillance software that people rush to daily.  Brother, and I am not referring to Big Brother with that exclamation.  Wikipedia explains, 

LifeLog aimed to compile a massive electronic database of every activity and relationship a person engages in. This was to include credit card purchases, websites visited, the content of telephone calls and e-mails sent and received, scans of faxes and postal mail sent and received, instant messages sent and received, books and magazines read, television and radio selections, physical location recorded via wearable GPS sensors, biomedical data captured through wearable sensors. The high-level goal of this data logging was to identify "preferences, plans, goals, and other markers of intentionality".[2] 

One can't help but notice that the concept for Facebook developed shortly after 9/11 [09/11/2001] and the PATRIOT Act that allowed for unwarranted surveillance of Americans.  It is the brainchild of DARPA, like all things connected to the internet.  UnlimitedHangout's article, whose title "DARPA's Data Mining for 'National Security' and to 'Humanize AI," reminds us how the intelligence community tries to humanize their surveillance of us:

In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, DARPA, in close collaboration with the US intelligence community (specifically the CIA), began developing a “precrime” approach to combatting terrorism known as Total Information Awareness or TIA. The purpose of TIA was to develop an “all-seeing” military-surveillance apparatus. The official logic behind TIA was that invasive surveillance of the entire US population was necessary to prevent terrorist attacks, bioterrorism events, and even naturally occurring disease outbreaks. 

There was actually an office established in 2002, less than a year after 9/11, that oversaw an invasive national surveillance program called, "Total Information Awareness."  The office overseeing that program was called Information Awareness Office.  Its name sounded too sweeping to critics, so the office changed the program's name from "Total" to "Terrorism Information Awareness" to make the American public think it exclusively targeted terrorists.  Ha!  It's still about total surveillance.

Well, 2002, you say,' was such a long time ago.  I say define "a long time ago."  This program is still around, and, in fact, changes its purpose and name like any intelligence community chameleon: 

The TIA projects were not actually closed down, however, with most moved to the classified portfolios of the Pentagon and US intelligence community. Some became intelligence funded and guided private-sector endeavors, such as Peter Thiel’s Palantir, while others resurfaced years later under the guise of combatting the COVID-19 crisis. 

Surveillance is ongoing.  Facebook is a tracking system. 

Facebook is a sweeping surveillance system tool, its Wikipedia page claims that it is a cute and innocuous "student directory featuring photos and basic information."  Hardly.  The opening buzz surrounding Facebook was the quality of one's photo or self-portrait, better known playfully as a selfie as a way to humanize or disarm the true nature of intelligence community programs: government surveillance.  Americans love to indict the Soviet Union's surveillance as an appalling assault on its citizens.  But put a cutesie face on a program, called it Facebook or WeChat or Smiley Face, and you've got millions of Americans signing up and paying for every surveillance tool in the government's toolbox.  

And like too many origin stories, Facebook's origin starts with a goofy, pasty-looking college kid who spent too much time in his dorm.  "Zuckerberg told the Crimson that . . . ," "Zuckerberg intended to create a website that . . . ," "Upon finishing the site, Zuckerberg told a couple of friends that . . . ," always involving some miraculous achievement, "Within twenty-four hours, we had somewhere between 1,215 registrants . . . ," and "By December 2005, Facebook had 6 million users . . . ."  I did not know that Peter Thiel was Facebook's first Angel Investor.

In the summer of 2004, venture capitalist Peter Thiel made a $500,001 angel investment in the social network Facebook for 10.2% of the company and joined Facebook's board. This was the first outside investment in Facebook. 

But it's hard to even trust these stories about any of these high-profile techie founders since the entire industry is one big CIA, NSA, etc. network.  And with the site originally created as a network for Harvard students, called Harvard Connections.com, what average-intelligence American could resist being part of a Harvard network for free?

Facebook serves this national security surveillance purpose happily, where people post what they've recently eaten for breakfast, new romances, the latest divorces, where they just returned to, and destinations for which they're making plans. 

Thank you to Greg Reese @ The Reese Report.

Books from James Bamford, whom the New Yorker called "The NSA's Chief Chronicler."

Vaccine exemptions, at least in the United States, are being recognized and affirmed on appeal.

1/ NAZI stolen art, the King of Spain & SCOTUS.
2/ Can a biotech company own your DNA without your consent? The Lacks case.
3/ Trump demands reinstatement of his social media accounts.
4/ Boston bans Christian flags?
LIVE at 7 pm EST w/ @thevivafrei   https://t.co/Kb5za61HY3

— Robert Barnes (@barnes_law) October 10, 2021

38:00  Not a surprise that it is George W. Bush's judges issuing these rulings.  It's clear they're not going to respect natural immunity at this point with any consistency.  Now just because these two cases lost out of the gate doesn't mean anything long-term.  The California professor is going to fight it all the way through; I am sure the same is true in Michigan.  This is just so they don't get emergency injunctive relief.  The rest of the fights are just beginning.  

Having natural immunity compounded with taking a vaccine, I wonder at what point is more not necessarily better?  And at what point ought people have the right to make their own decisions?  

A bunch more suits.  First-responders continue to file suits all across the country.  Employees continue to file suits all across the country.  And I filed suit this week against Tyson Foods for its discrimination against people who asserted religious objections and its discrimination against people who have medical objections in Dire County, Tennessee, and I filed it on behalf of all Tyson employees who could be impacted by it.  We'll be seeking injunctive relief this week.  I detailed the whole suit in a video because the suit has a lot of medical information in it that YouTube doesn't like discussed, you can get the whole details of that suit.  And I'll be posting the suit by tomorrow, as soon as Locals gets their pdf aspect up, I'll be up and going.  The New York Times just three days ago praised Tyson Foods vaccine mandates saying that they haven't faced any lawsuits over it.  And that was a little premature for the New York Times.  Maybe if they followed this channel, they wouldn't have got that wrong like they got some other COVID things wrong this week.  

Vaccine exemptions, at least in the United States, are being recognized and affirmed on appeal. 

Natural immunity not so much.  

How could the New York Times get their facts so monumentally wrong?  Does it not go through an editor, a fact-checker . . . .  She was a prize-winning journalist?  Question about the merit that she won.  She overstated the number of child hospitalization by the small amount of 800,000.  And not like a typo.  Not like it was . . . .  Even the revised number of 63,000 child hospitalization might not be entirely accurate because the number doesn't reflect the hospitalization from COVID nor does it specify if hospitalization was the result of something else.  Sloppy reporting nonetheless.