1/ NAZI stolen art, the King of Spain & SCOTUS.
— Robert Barnes (@barnes_law) October 10, 2021
2/ Can a biotech company own your DNA without your consent? The Lacks case.
3/ Trump demands reinstatement of his social media accounts.
4/ Boston bans Christian flags?
LIVE at 7 pm EST w/ @thevivafrei https://t.co/Kb5za61HY3
38:00 Not a surprise that it is George W. Bush's judges issuing these rulings. It's clear they're not going to respect natural immunity at this point with any consistency. Now just because these two cases lost out of the gate doesn't mean anything long-term. The California professor is going to fight it all the way through; I am sure the same is true in Michigan. This is just so they don't get emergency injunctive relief. The rest of the fights are just beginning.
Having natural immunity compounded with taking a vaccine, I wonder at what point is more not necessarily better? And at what point ought people have the right to make their own decisions?
A bunch more suits. First-responders continue to file suits all across the country. Employees continue to file suits all across the country. And I filed suit this week against Tyson Foods for its discrimination against people who asserted religious objections and its discrimination against people who have medical objections in Dire County, Tennessee, and I filed it on behalf of all Tyson employees who could be impacted by it. We'll be seeking injunctive relief this week. I detailed the whole suit in a video because the suit has a lot of medical information in it that YouTube doesn't like discussed, you can get the whole details of that suit. And I'll be posting the suit by tomorrow, as soon as Locals gets their pdf aspect up, I'll be up and going. The New York Times just three days ago praised Tyson Foods vaccine mandates saying that they haven't faced any lawsuits over it. And that was a little premature for the New York Times. Maybe if they followed this channel, they wouldn't have got that wrong like they got some other COVID things wrong this week.
Vaccine exemptions, at least in the United States, are being recognized and affirmed on appeal.
Natural immunity not so much.
How could the New York Times get their facts so monumentally wrong? Does it not go through an editor, a fact-checker . . . . She was a prize-winning journalist? Question about the merit that she won. She overstated the number of child hospitalization by the small amount of 800,000. And not like a typo. Not like it was . . . . Even the revised number of 63,000 child hospitalization might not be entirely accurate because the number doesn't reflect the hospitalization from COVID nor does it specify if hospitalization was the result of something else. Sloppy reporting nonetheless.
