this will be shocking to people, President Truman vetoed [McCarran Internal Security Act of 1950]; he vetoed that law, yes, he did and yet a bipartisan Senate overrode that veto so that we could actually address the subversion that was already changing our system in this very dangerous fashion. --Diana West
the situation is so dire in terms of the belief systems animating these far left and Islamic candidates in terms of our system. They're not extreme in their own system. Go and be a Sharia candidate in the numerous countries of the Islamic world, right, that's fine. It's not weird or crazy or extreme out there. It is here. --Diana West
4:15. It was a blue Massacre is what it was, and I know that there are many facets to what happened in the midterms because as we've mentioned before this was not the Democrat Party. It's not Democrats vs. Republicans, it's communism vs. Republicans. They are non JFK's party, these people. The dangerous thing, of course, in my opinion, is about allowing these Marxists in is that once they're in, they're going to find every way to stay in, whether it's cheat to see if she, they will do anything to stay in power and to have what happened last night is puzzling to me. So how do you see it, how do you break down what we saw last night?
5:02. Well, I think a good way to start is to get rid of the color blue for the Democrats and move it to red and green. It's a good idea but I have not done a tight tally on this, but Mike Waller from the Center for Security Policy has posted an interesting comment about this. He's saying that the red-green axis is becoming the majority coalition in Congress. Now what that means is that there is this very large Marxist factions and Muslim Brotherhood faction that are working together that are going to be the political engine of what we've been talking about for some years now with this red green axis which is essentially two sides of a totalitarian movement that is anti-constitutional and anti-American. Yeah, it's it's anti-American. This is where people become so befuddled and rightfully so or perplexed horrified all rightfully so because the question always becomes how can people want to overthrow our government and change her Constitution out of recognition and impose various totalitarian features of Marxism and Islam on us which is unconstitutional and the question is you know there have been the guardrails were pulled off of totalitarians entering into our system many many years ago and it goes back really I've been thinking about this more and more and it goes back to the days when Congress the Senate in particular bipartisan Senate and House looked at the subversion by communists of our government coming out of the World War II years and actually started doing something about it and one of the things they did was that they defined subversion in terms of the totalitarian system that wish to overthrow our country and they drew a big line against it and this was codified in a law called the McCarran Internal Security Act of 1950, which I will tell you, this will be shocking to people, President Truman vetoed it; he vetoed that law, yes, he did and yet a bipartisan Senate overrode that veto so that we could actually address the subversion that was already changing our system in this very dangerous fashion. And just to make a very long story short, this act, and acts like it, were systematically dismantled by the courts, by the Supreme Court and we were essentially left without the protection that such laws afforded us. You know, when our Founders were beginning their country, we didn't have things like communism and Islam as threats, but this totalitarian threat that's become so pernicious and forceful in the 20th century was addressed by law, but it was taken away from us. So, we're at this point now where we have subversives being elected, and that kind of language, I know some people will turn off to it, "subversive," what does that mean? It sounds crazy, red paranoia, this kind of thing. However, we could define it this way in terms of people who seek a totalitarian destruction of our constitutional republic.
8:44. It's a very simple concept and unfortunately, these are the people, the beliefs that seem to be dominant in this new Congress, in this new Senate that we will see seated come 2027. One thing I think will really shock people is to understand that senator Pat McCarron whose name is on that Internal Security Act 1950 was a Democrat. No, we had, this was a very bipartisan effort. We had Democrats and Republicans both Joseph McCarthy was a Republican Senator Pat McCarron was a Democrat; this was a bipartisan recognition of the dangers of totalitarianism which has been utterly neutered over the decades, over the generations and we don't even have a grasp on it at this point. So this was many, many other factors; this is where we are today. Unprotected. Lawless.
10:07. What were some of the responses, well, what was President Trump's response, what was, someone I'm not a fan of and I would never hope for, what was J. D. Vance's response and some of these so-called pundits out there?
10:33. It's a shock of course I was not shocked I I don't have high hopes I've seen many people saying how disappointed they were disappointed yes but not shocked I was expecting this I've been feeling the collapse really the kind of dissolution of our agenda are forward motion in many many ways we've watched the Trump agenda you know going forward from closing the border, pardoning J6 prisoners, going forward from those very clean successful acts we've watched a very frustrating two years where I feel Trump fell into trap after trap after trap purposefully set to distract from the agenda, taking him into the Alibaba taverns, Arabian Nights kind of weird rabbit hole of Qatar and Turkey and thinking he was going to solve the problems of the war in Gaza with the border nonsensical traps, and, yes, of course, he's responsible for etc., etc., etc. I agree, however, I do think that does not take away from the fact that I do believe these traps were set purposely to distract from the agenda, and unfortunately he fell into many of them. Then we also have the, I think, the biggest couple of, biggest culprits would be any other branches of government. We had a judiciary that has blocked him at every turn, trying to enforce the immigration long I guess actual murders, terrorists, killers, just the most egregious people, terrorists, of course, in the aftermath of October 7 attacks that seem to turn all the politics and all of the world into a new and perilous trap. And then, of course, we've seen the Senate, a special blame has to be placed on the side remember we had two houses of Congress for these past couple of years and the amount of harm that the GOP Senate did to the Trump agenda, to me, it's not to Donald Trump, it means to us, we elected him. This is an act of war against the people. That Senate under John Thune has been the single largest factor in the derailment of the Trump agenda as it's gone forward between courts and the Senate, get the save America Act to where voter ID and other protections of the vote by this time. We did not pass that. We did not get a single, President Trump did not get a single recess appointment he did not get any of his agenda items codified by this Senate, by John Thune from this very small state, and it's not just Thune, it's not really his personality, one person. All of the GOP Senators who did not do something about this. So there has been a sabotage of the American people over these two years that we see coming out in this absolutely catastrophic election.
14:00. And I think catastrophic because it isn't really . . . , you know, I lived through I lived in Washington for many many years. I watched these elections, midterms, the president losing power, going back to the other party, this and that some big wins, you know, over the years. You see these rocking back and forth of these matters. This is not normal. These people elected in this new class, you know, in the next class of Congress, they are coming from an extremism that is off the charts. The spectrum has to be extended to include these people coming from democratic socialists, coming from proponents of Islam, Sharia, Etc. The election to the Senate of el-Sayed is an absolute nadir, well, I'm sure there will be more. Because this is someone who is so clearly identified with various arms, fronts, organizations, personalities, money funding, all connected to the larger Muslim Brotherhood orbit of jihad. And yet, even so, in a state like Michigan, which last time I looked still remains a majority of Americans. It is not an Arab colonized State at this point despite the large Muslim population and it's still very tiny by percentage points. However it worked, whether there was fraud or not, it really doesn't matter. I mean it matters but not in the sense of the actual electoral outcome. I don't think there was fraud to an extent well we'll never know because . . . we don't have a save America Act . . . we end up with this Senate seat, very important, a senate seat in the hands of an el-Sayed, and even there that cannot be turned back and then you have people, I mean the different delegations, New York, New Jersey, we have a New Jersey congressman who was, I think, you could call him a character witness for the blind sheiks in the World Trade Center bombing of 1993. He was a defense witness. Yeah, so, and more, and it goes on, you can start tearing these things out so when you're looking at this kind of an election it is electing enemies of this constitutional republic now hold seats in this constitutional republic. So, it's a very stark situation you find yourself in and then the question becomes "Will President Trump "work with Democrats"? I'm already hearing that noxious phrase. And I would just like to put it out there to people, the situation is so dire in terms of the belief systems animating these far left and Islamic candidates in terms of our system. They're not extreme in their own system. Go and be a Sharia candidate in the numerous countries in the Islamic world, right, that's fine. It's not weird or crazy or extreme out there. It is here. This is a very different system. Same with the Marxists. But when you talk about working with this kind of extremism that is actually trying to overthrow you it reminds me very much of policies that the United States forced on anti-communist governments during World War II in the aftermath during the Cold War and so on where are the Nationalist candidate or leader like a Chiang Kai-shek in China I'm thinking of would be forced into a coalition government which is communist so to illustrate that Chiang Kai-shek was being pushed by the United States to work with Mao. There are numerous situations like this in various countries over the years.
18:00. This is actually a very common dynamic. But I think for purposes of illustration that one really shows how stark it is. You are being asked to work with Mao, and I think in terms of the extremism that is not an exaggeration in terms of the goals and the agenda and the disaster working with someone trying to destroy your system actually promises. This is kind of where we are and as far as the blame game, you asked, the blame game is very interesting watching it evolve. I've seen Israel blamed. Our relationship with Israel blamed, which sounds absolutely mad except when you realize that what we really should start calling Jew hatred . . . the former ambassador of the United States to Israel, William Friedman, made a very stark comment today. He said "Jew hatred has become a political movement in the United States of America," which sounds shocking but it's a true thing. I would say the president Trump and not only in fighting the Islamic agenda these first two years has also failed to call out the anti-semitism on the right and this has been allowed to grow. And this comes through the Tucker Carlson wing, but it also seems to come from his own Vice President, JD Vance, who enumerated a series of reasons that the election was lost in his view, which even included, besides our relation ship with Israel, also included the war with Iran, which is quite, quite a mouthful given Vance's disastrous involvement in terms of these negotiations that he had to lead. It was absolutely terrible. Remember, "We love Pakistan!" He said as he went into a negotiation that was destined to fail and frankly I don't really feel that people are running around worried about the war with Iran I think that this was a failure on the part of people with children and grandchildren to take the responsibility to ensure that their children and grandchildren would be alive and flourishing for another generation. It's that dire. This was a simple, simple kind of election. I feel like we had our fingernails in the sand and trying to stay and not be dragged by the current away from existence. It's basically a lever. It was a red lever, a Republican lever to push regardless because of this existential threat. The man who closed the Border needs a supportive party. He needs at least to be guaranteed that he will not be impeached or at least not be convicted. We do not have that. The man who closed the Border does not have that support from his own party and for me . . .
20:46. What a betrayal.
20:47. What a tract to vote on!
20:49. No that is not a rant that's the truth exactly look at what he was doing for all Americans they've been talking about the ones they've been pursuing there are child rapists child murderers they are rapists they are murderers. It just goes on and on and what disturbs me the most the ignorance of you know because they use euphemisms like well you know DSA when it's really communist Eisenhower had signed communist Control Act of 1954 which for the listeners Outlaw the Communist Party in the USA and criminalized membership in or support for it based on the belief that Communists aimed to overthrow the US government American institutions from organizations that sought to undermine democracy through violent means what happened to that because this is what we're seeing right now.
22:08. Right, of course, well, it's been a very long, a very long march through these institutions, a very long War, a very long propaganda War. The leaders I was alluding to in the Senate and the house it's very difficult to fight because these people these communists and Soviet agents, and fellow Travelers. They were literally under the discipline of Moscow when this all began in terms of this public reckoning on this. At least we have this window of time where it's being taken very seriously. It was a dirty slog, hard fight, and essentially we lost. Essentially the anti-communist Lost this part of the war and the tragedy is is that that history and those Heroes were essentially lost to us their errors and this is something that I've been writing about recently I haven't published it yet but this break with our anti-communist pass was part of this under money because essentially we ended up with a conservative Viewpoint a conservative movement that words always a little fuzzy but you know this notion of Republicans conservatives Patriots that had no connection to their anti-communist roots and that is why that you and I are are sitting there saying gee the president said this and made this clear then in the Senate did this then and it's new to most people and this is part of the vector of attack this is not just happenstance this kind of an ideological war because communism is an ideological war as is Islam this kind of War is is hot on all fronts and particularly I would say the most important front is the psychological you know the concept of brainwashing which actually was a word that was coined not for a comic book or anything like that it was coined by a man named Edward Hunter coined the term brainwashing he been a reporter and he was a national security expert and he was in China under Mao reporting and so on, and he actually, and it was a translation of a Chinese phrase "washing of the brain" that was going on through repetition, through what we know as "struggle sessions," basically the equivalent in our time would be watching a continuous loop of Fox News and CNN. You get this constant feed the message of the day, that and no more. I blame Fox News more than I blame CNN people should stop watching Fox News it is not telling you the truth they are controlling the narrative in the same way that CNN is known to control the narrative among conservatives and it obliterates your thinking mechanisms. And this is all part of the same dummy dumbing down I guess we could call it of the American electorate and then you know we see things like Ilhan Omar or Mayor Mamdani of New York City. Both of them could be deported. Both of them have broken immigration law to a point where they should have been deported and yet there is a paralysis, a paralysis that Trump could not could not break.
25:44. And I think that is you know partly because of I'm sure there are people who could have been more effective but on the other hand I think it also speaks to the extent to which we were gone as a functioning country. If you get to a point where are you in this paralysis, you know, like I've always thought that Hillary Clinton become president in 2016 as was planned. I think a lot of these changes may have gone down without most people even noticing. I think that Trump was the interrupter. He has interrupted the plan going back 10 years and created, because he interrupted it and stopped a lot of these things in their tracks, including Hillary Clinton, it created all new kinds of chaos around this potential reversal of our demise. That's still how I look at it. And this is why it has been such a cataclysmic decade since he was the one guy, one man who actually had that charisma and those ideas. That's all we had left was Donald Trump circa 2015 to actually try to restore a nation. And what has gone on all these years, all my own quarrels with him, not literally quarrels with him but my own disappointments and frustrations have been considerable, constant. I still go back to the fact that he was one guy, and the idea of blaming him for this loss, it is every voter's responsibility; this was our failure at least those of us who didn't come out and vote correctly but this is not something to blame on I don't think on some policy of his this was something a lack of recognition a lack of attachment to country, to the Constitution to the lack of understanding what was at risk and maybe that was his fault for not explaining it, not deploying people to make his case more effectively, okay, but, you know what, if you're voting you're an adult, and you should figure it out.
28:00. Yeah, and do your homework. You tell your kids to do it but you won't do it yourself. You don't know what communism is. And very simply, these people they'll say "Oh no, I don't want to destroy the Constitution," but everything they say is to destroy the Constitution which enshrines our individual rights, which are not given to us by man but by God. That's what they loathe. They want them given to us by them so they can take them away right. They give to whom they want and they take away . . . . As you were saying, there was a woman in Georgia where she said that "anybody that voted for Trump we should find out who they are and they should have their internet privileges censored, so they can't say anything for 4 years." You see this is communism. You see we're going to give privileges to whom we desire because the rule originates in us. The Constitution says it does not, and this is what they hate most about that document. They did not give us our freedoms. They want to destroy it so then they can say we give you freedom or we don't give you freedom. And if we can get this through to Americans' minds because they apparently but intentionally did not learn this in school because who heard about communism in school unless . . . ?
29:27. You did not. No you did not. You did not hear about it, and that's by design; that's not happenstance either. So we've been gradually, we've been made very ignorant in our own systems and that is a hard thing to think your way through. But I mean you even got senator when we started talking about that anecdote that you were talking about Senator Slotkin, Michigan who has also discussed in the run-up to election day, punishing people who voted, who work for Donald Trump. It is quite dire in the sense that this is the mentality that we have even in our bad education we will recognize from totalitarian systems that put political dissenters into gulags or death camps and this is something we always thought was far away. But the mentality is here and it was rewarded, has been rewarded by many, many voting in our elections. We're voting this in or at least we're cheating this in is this coming in however you regard our election system at this point I guess ever since the Advent of computers and not paper ballots we are allowing this to come in at least with the perception of legality and it is one of the most excruciating revolutions to watch, a slow motion, a slow motion Revolution, a slow motion death spiral, whatever your dire image of the day is. It is real the more they have critical mass, the more that it becomes real in a very personal, dangerous, active sense. They have a lot of power. These are becoming I haven't seen the latest votes myself but these are becoming close to your veto-proof. I don't know if they're actually at that point but these are becoming huge majorities, but again as Mike Waller pointed out that we are looking at this large coalition of a red green Marxist Islamic coalition and they will vote together. This will be a real block and to think of that coming in through an election and not an invasion, at least a classic invasion is a shocking thing and I think all of our dead ancestors going back, however many generations, would be more shocked than they would be appalled. No one could believe that we have let this go to this point or that it had been taken from us. I think it would just be absolutely mind blowing from anybody from any previous generation.
32:15. With all the many distractions which you don't have to be distracted we have the greatest access information than anytime in history and yet we're dumber than a rock and we have handed this over they do not understand what they've done if the voters did not come out because I'm not sure I agree with some of the posters that the New York Post said that oh no there was a good turnout it's just that they voted for the other side no I'm sorry I'm not buying that I'm really not I'm saying they didn't show up because they were angry and what's really shocking to me is that it wasn't just that they'd said something about that I have to agree with her about this because some were complaining of course about the prices of everything the price of gas and Etc and she had a basically she said if you were looking angry because voting because you're angry or I didn't get my or my gas prices are too high I can't buy what I want not looking at how long it takes to bring something back when it's been destroyed and then you believe the lies and the Communists are saying sure no problem will give you this will give you that and they're lying to you and it's the best way to get you right into communism because they figure they're going to give it to you because even though they don't have their own stash that's our money.
34:00. Right yes it's a very corrupting process a lot of it again gets enforced and forced by the constant drum beat of the slogans people might remember under Mao's China that before technology and Communications became technological you know you'd see literal slogans painted on signs and banners were similar. We're bludgeoned with the same kinds of things oh gas prices are high yes of course they are but gas prices are high get mad at Trump don't vote for Trump's party." It's childish
