REMDESIVIR FOR THE KILL. AGAIN. DOCTOR GAVE IT EVEN AFTER THE MOM SAID TO TAKE HIM OFF IT. DEATH BY HOSPITAL PROTOCOL STRIKES AGAIN! This time it's a healthy 39-year-old man

If you don't want to be fooled . . . fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me . . . if you don't want to be fooled, then STAY.  OUT.  OF.  THE.  HOSPITAL. 

Pretty sure her 39-year-old son wasn't suffering from a Remdesivir deficiency.  

Beware, folks, it looks like that regardless of your diagnosis hospitals will give you Remdesivir, the Gilead/Fauci drug that destroys your kidneys before it kills you.  And this is hospital protocol.  So, please, don't fall under the spell of the Indian, Pakistani, Filipino, Ghanian, or Brooklyn Nazi man or woman in the white coat.  Simply up your Vitamin D3, magnesium, and vitamins C, B, and E content.  More importantly, eat a giant steak and eggs, cooked in butter or lard.  Diet has a far more profound effect on your health than the highest grade vitamin manufacturer that you can find.

My Son Was Killed By Hospital Covid Protocol #FL https://t.co/MImnWPOm5H

— Children’s Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) November 18, 2023

ATTY TOM RENZ: Dr Mercola just put out a paper where he discussed ventilators. That concept for ventilators came from China

#3 - “No one told the patients, hey, you’re going to be put on this vent. It’s probably going to kill you, but it may protect the healthcare workers,” testified attorney @RenzTom to the Pennsylvania State Senate earlier this year. “No one told the families that.” pic.twitter.com/Tk8t1f7iY1

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) November 1, 2023

And she has audio recordings of a conversation between her and a nurse I recently publicized.  The nurse is talking about how they're killing people in the hospital, how their floor was doing the things that no other floor would do because, well, no other floor wanted to carry out the murder essentially.  They knew what was happening in a lot of cases.  Dr. Mercola just put out a paper where he discussed ventilators.  Ventilators, that concept for ventilators came from China.  If you put a ventilator on someone's face, they can't cough on you, so we'll keep the healthcare worker safe, right?

Even though that we knew that 75% or so of the people in New York City put on ventilators were dying, we kept doing it to protect the healthcare workers.  That was the theory.  Now no one talked about that when the patients were going in there.  there.  No one told the patients, "Hey, you're being protected . . .  you're going to be put on this.  this.   It's probably going to kill you, but it may protect the healthcare workers.  No one told the families that.  And by the way, we actually had whistleblower testimony from a yet-to-be unmasked whistleblower, and probably won't be, who worked from CMS.  I've got data from CMS that showed in a number of Texas hospitals that as high as 90% of patients put on the vent died.  90%.  Now they wouldn't let you try Ivermectin but they were more than willing to put you on the vent where you had a 90% fatality rate you're telling me that they didn't notice the you're telling me that the doctors on those floors I mean listen you know I can't say all doctors are created equal McCullough is ahead above most.  But if you got through med school,  you could probably . . . I would think you would probably be smart enough to notice that when 9 out of 10 of your patients and when they're put on the vent die, at least maybe you should ask the question, Is there a better way?  Why not let someone try Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine if you have a 9 out of 10 chance of dying anyways?

The reason that that's dear to my heart is because the people called me and I fought with hospital after hospital after hospital to try and save their lives.  And as I testified last year here, we essentially legislated these deaths into being by incentivizing the use of Remdesivir in protocols incentivizing the use of ventilators, and incentivizing, again not people recovering from COVID but people dying from COVID.  You got a cash bonus when someone died from COVID.  So it was and incentive to kill people and it worked incredibly well.  I'm happy to revisit that but again my testimony from last year covered that.  

NY Cuomo public hospitals starved COVID ventilated patients

@StellaPaulNY describes how the NY Cuomo public hospitals starved COVID ventilated patients, etc. There must be criminal prosecutions. I’m in court now to get answers. @TheChiefNerd @EpochTimes @TuckerCarlson @NMalliotakis @RepBradWenstrup https://t.co/XKBq3yjzpD pic.twitter.com/B3rgZfkWYC

— The Healthcare Channel (@THEHCC) October 23, 2023

The commonality is that they isolate you from your family, they give you Remdesivir, and they use the shutdown of your kidneys that that causes and the retention of fluids to say "You can't handle food and water now," and they starve and dehydrate these people.  These people are starving. 

You're sick with COVID.  They're not treating the COVID.  You're getting nothing for COVID.  You're being poisoned with Remdesivir and you have no nutrition in you.  Then very commonly they'll call in a psychiatrist to say that you're agitated, and they start filling you with sedatives that also shut down . . . like a fentanyl and morphine and that also shuts down your body's ability to to respond to and fend off the Remdesivir.

Now comes the next step.  Very common.  You mentioned ventilation.  There's a step to get you ventilated.  Because in your medical records they have to show the justification.  And the ventilation was a big ticket item in terms of the financial incentives.  They wanted to move you along there, and giving you oxygen was a pathway step.  And they put a bypath machine on, an oxygen machine, that involves putting a mask on your face and they crank it up to maximum pressure.  And I want to say, whether you need the oxygen or not . . . we have testimony from the mother of Daniel Alvarez, a 28-year-old special needs young lady, who had perfect oxygen.  She was given this treatment, ventilated, and she didn't make it . . . and so this is a horrible feeling to have because they crank it up and it's maximum pressure.  You feel like you can't breathe, and so some patients try to take the mask off their face.  And I mentioned the 25 commonalities . . . 

HOW AND WHEN THE U.S. SURRENDERED SOVEREIGNTY

Bipartisan Presidential Executive Orders in 2003, 2005, and 2014 authorized the Secretary of Health and Human Services to detain Americans on suspicion of having colds and flus.

Third installment of the Callender Interview series.

Jan. 31, 2022 - Attorney Todd Callender explains the legal framework for suspension of human rights and civil liberties globally. Set in motion by the Bank of International Settlements in 1990, ratified by national governments in 2005, and implemented in 2020 with a “WHO-declared pandemic.”

Feb. 2, 2022 - January 19, 2017 Federal Register. US Health and Human Services final rulemaking, WHO International Health Regulations, and human liberty. 

OBSERVATION:

The governments of nation-states around the world can’t stop the mass murder and mass maiming of the world’s people through forced detentions (in homes, nursing homes, schools, hospitals, and quarantine facilities); forced masking and social distancing; forced withholding of preventative and early treatments for Covid-19; forced administration of ventilation, Remdesivir, midazolam and other lethal poisons; and forced administration of mRNA and DNA bioweapon injections, until those governments and their central banks (the Federal Reserve in the United States) are prepared to forego access to the international financial system controlled by the individuals who control the Bank for International Settlements.

One step would be the signing of a Presidential Executive Order revoking Executive Order 13295 of April 4, 2003; Executive Order 13375 of April 1, 2005, and Executive Order 13674 of July 31, 2014, and reinstating Executive Order 12452 of Dec. 22, 1983.

2005 - World Health Organization creates International Health Regulations, IHR

In 2005, through the World Health Organization, the individuals who control the Bank of International Settlements created the International Health Regulations (IHR).

The second edition of the IHR is described, by WHO, as follows: 

"In response to the exponential increase in international travel and trade and emergence and reemergence of international disease threats and other health risks, 196 countries across the globe have agreed to implement the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR). This binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007.”

The stated purpose and scope of the IHR are "to prevent, protect against, control and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease in ways that are commensurate with and restricted to public health risks, and which avoid unnecessary interference with international traffic and trade."

The IHR "are not limited to specific diseases, but are applicable to health risks, irrespective of their origin or source." 

The IHR further, "requires States to strengthen core surveillance and response capacities at the primary, intermediate and national level, as well as at designated international ports, airports and ground crossings. They further introduce a series of health documents, including ship sanitation certificates and an international certificate of vaccination or prophylaxis for travelers."

The 2005 International Health Regulations required each signatory nation to adopt implementing legislation, which the United States government did, through [among many other acts] revisions to 42 Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 70 and 71.

Those federal laws regulate interstate and foreign quarantine activities during "public health emergencies of international concern."

2017 - Major rulemaking by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

The most recent, major revisions of 42 CFR Parts 70 and 71 occurred through a "final rulemaking" by the Department of Health and Human Services, published in the Federal Register on Jan. 19, 2017, and effective Feb. 17, 2017. (See 6890 Federal Register. Vol. 82, No. 12)

The Federal Register entry reported that some commenters, during the public comment period, requested clarification concerning whether the World Health Organization’s (WHO) declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) could continue to serve as the basis for a ‘‘public health emergency’’ if the President or HHS Secretary disagreed with the declaration of a PHEIC on legal, epidemiologic, or policy grounds.

Health and Human Services/Centers for Disease Control respondents described such a scenario as “unlikely” and noted that “CDC remains a component of HHS, subject to the authority and supervision of the HHS Secretary and President of the United States.”

Another comment addressed the same concern from a slightly different perspective: the commenter “objected to referencing the WHO’s declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) in the definition of ‘‘public health emergency’’ because this ostensibly relinquishes U.S. sovereignty.”

Again, HHS/CDC respondents said they “disagreed” with the characterization, stating that US government officials would "give consideration to the WHO’s declaration of a PHEIC" but would “continue to make its own independent decisions regarding when a quarantinable communicable disease may be likely to cause a public health emergency if transmitted to other individuals.”

A few paragraphs later, the HHS/CDC respondents again said that “it would be unlikely for the United States to formally object to the WHO’s declaration of a PHEIC, but that CDC remains a component of HHS, subject to the authority and supervision of the HHS Secretary and President of the United States.”

It’s very careful sophistry. HHS states that the US government is unlikely to even try to resist a WHO declaration, not addressing what would happen in the unlikely event of such an attempt. Presumably because it would be financially impossible for the US government to make the attempt because the Federal Reserve would immediately lose access to the Bank of International Settlements.

Other commenters expressed concern that "any disease considered to be a public health emergency may qualify it as quarantinable" and noted that some PHEICs ‘‘most certainly do not qualify as public health emergencies’’ under the proposed definition.

HHS/CDC respondents “clarified” that “only those communicable diseases listed by Executive Order of the President may qualify as quarantinable communicable diseases. For example, Zika virus infection, which although the current epidemic was declared a PHEIC by WHO, is not a quarantinable communicable disease.”

After dispatching with the comments, the HHS/CDC respondents concluded:  “The definition of Public health emergency is finalized as proposed.”

US Presidents’ Executive Orders since 1990

As it happens, there have been three Executive Orders issued by US Presidents related to the quarantine power of the Secretary of Health and Human Services laws since 1990.

They were promulgated under section 361(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264(b)), and they assigned the President's executive authority to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for implementation.

Executive Order 13295

On April 4, 2003, President George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13295, listing: 

“(a) Cholera; Diphtheria; infectious Tuberculosis; Plague; Smallpox; Yellow Fever; and Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (Lassa, Marburg, Ebola, Crimean-Congo, South American, and others not yet isolated or named) and

(b) Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), which is a disease associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, is transmitted from person to person predominantly by the aerosolized or droplet route, and, if spread in the population, would have severe public health consequences.” 

See Federal Register/Vol. 68, No. 68, p. 17255

The 2003 Executive Order revoked Executive Order 12452 of Dec. 22, 1983, which specified quarantinable diseases as including "Cholera or suspected Cholera, Diphtheria, infectious Tuberculosis, Plague, suspected Smallpox, Yellow Fever, and suspected Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers (Lassa, Marburg, Ebola, Congo-Crimean, and others not yet isolated or named).”

In other words, in 2003, President Bush added the common cold to the list of communicable diseases empowering the executive branch, through the Secretary of Health and Human Services, to summarily detain American citizens and prevent them from traveling across state or federal borders.

Executive Order 13375 of April 1, 2005

On April 1, 2005, President Bush signed Executive Order 13375, extending the quarantine power of the Health and Human Services Secretary to include:

“(c) Influenza caused by novel or reemergent influenza viruses that are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic.’’ 

(See Federal Register, Vol. 70, No. 64, p. 17299)

In 2005, the executive branch of the federal government granted itself the power to detain American citizens for the flu.

Executive Order 13674 of July 31, 2014

On July 31, 2014, President Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13674, revising Section b of President Bush's 2003 order. The new text expanded on the definition of SARS [the common cold]:

“(b) Severe acute respiratory syndromes, which are diseases that are associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, are capable of being transmitted from person to person, and that either are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic, or, upon infection, are highly likely to cause mortality or serious morbidity if not properly controlled. This subsection does not apply to influenza.’’ 

See Federal Register Vol. 79, No. 151, p. 45671

Parsed, in 2014, the federal government expanded its power to detain American citizens for common colds, not only if the diseases are "transmitted" but if they are "capable of being transmitted . . . and are causing, or have the potential to cause a pandemic."

That's what made it legally possible for President Trump and President Biden, working through the Centers for Disease Control, to 

1.  place all Americans — including healthy Americans with no symptoms — under house/business/school arrest; 

2.  order that healthy Americans wear medical devices (cloth masks) without individual clinical diagnoses, without evidence of efficacy for infection control, and without a personal physician's prescription; and submit to forcible injection of mRNA and DNA toxins.

Combined effect of International Health Regulations and implementing national regulations and executive orders

Explaining the combined effect in the podcast interview, Attorney Todd Callender stated:

“It allows for, in every instance, a suspension of your human rights, your sovereign rights, your Constitutional rights, charter rights."

Iain Davis, author of Pseudopandemic: New Normal Technocracy, 2021, writing at The Disillusioned Blogger. 

In March of 2020, Birx and Dr. Anthony Fauci were grinning like Cheshire Cats with Duper's Delight as they laid out an unprecedented lockdown strategy which Birx later admitted they pulled out of their asses.

Given how health officials [I would never call them experts, nor would I call a doctor expert; no, I would call them order followers, like good little Nazis.  Seriously] had said one thing, and then changed their statements weeks or months later, then claiming that they didn't have all the science, while claiming in the other breath that we've got the science when they want you to follow them verbatim, I wouldn't trust anything that they say even if what they say lines up with your values or convictions.  What's the phrase, "Opt out"?  Do that.  But it is fun and interesting to see the crooks dance around on hot coals.  

The trial balloons were clearly shot down out of the sky with .22s #DoNotComply #ZeroFscksGiven  https://t.co/3mRI2gWCrN

— Tom Luongo (Head Sneetch) (@TFL1728) September 4, 2023

Here's the link to the ZeroHedge article.

In March of 2020, Birx and Dr. Anthony Fauci were grinning like Cheshire Cats with Duper's Delight as they laid out an unprecedented lockdown strategy which Birx later admitted they pulled out of their asses. 

By the way, if you're not familiar with the term Duper's Delight, here's a definition, 

Duping delight is a micro-expression that betrays a person's enjoyment of controlling and deceiving another person. It is a form of body language reserved for pathological character types such as psychopaths. Psychopaths are obsessed with control and power over others, and they often display duping delight when lying to others.0 Duping delight can manifest through subtle facial expressions, body language, or vocal cues.1 It is hard to contain duping delight, and those who feel it want to share their accomplishments with others, seeking admiration for their exploits. 

More from ZeroHedge,

Now that we're revisiting mask mandates over the latest Covid-19 surge, Birx and Fauci are seemingly on different sides of the debate.

"We don't need to mandate," Birx told Newsmax on Saturday, in response to reports that an increasing number of hospitals and businesses are now requiring masks again.

"We need to actually empower people with the information that they need for themselves and their families because every family is different," she continued. "And by the way, outside is safe, and playgrounds are safe."  How is it that each and everyone of the health officials look so ugly.  

Paul Mango looks like Lon Chaney who played the phantom in the 1925 version of The Phantom of the Opera.

And Mango simply parrots what Birx said about information, but it's precisely the information that has formed the raging propaganda campaign in the war on the American people.  Again, how can anyone start to think that the information they the gov't officials have and WANT TO SHARE is of any value.  They pimped the promises of Remdesivir and others as they buried and demonized the true remedy of Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, and zinc.  Yet information is still buried.  We're still being lied to.  

In the mandated hospital protocols and the drug selected by Anthony Fauci to treat all Covid-19 Americans who were infected, I knew what I called then would be Anthony Fauci's genocide.  It was going to be how Anthony was going to kill hundreds of thousands if not millions of Americans treated in hospitals around the country and I have not gotten off of this ever since.  So the truth is in the memo that Anthony Foundry stated was that there was one drug and one drug only that was found to be effective in a viral trial against Ebola virus a year earlier and this experimental antiviral drug called remdesivir that at that time had never been FDA approved he said it was proven safe and effective against the Ebola virus but now we're going to use it in America as the only treatment of all hospitalized covid-19 SARS covid 2 virus infected people and so I had never heard of from Death severe so I selected the actual hyperlink on the nih.gov's website the National Institutes of Health

https://myfreedoctor.com/.  The best parts of this presentation come after the 18-minute mark.  

https://www.synergyhealthdpc.com/.  

Dose for adults with Covid-19 in hospitals.  0.2 to 0.6 milligrams for every 2.2 pounds of body weight for 5 days.  This is another Indian vendor.  

https://www.alldaychemist.com/. From that site, All Day Chemist, I received this reply to "Where are you located?" 

you can place order and within 30-40 days it would be delivered. We ship through postal service and your order can be tracked. Order will be shipped from India, Singapore.

B-Complex is vital to repair and rebuild the muscle tissue of the heart.

Trump Owned by Big Pharma, Meaning FDA AND Gilead AND Others

The ‘very, very bad look' of remdesivir, the first FDA-approved COVID-19 drug | Science | AAAS https://t.co/iPMvUPThNa

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) July 25, 2023

I really don't like this photo of Trump being squeezed on the left and right side of his desk.  He looks trapped or captured.  

The caption reads President Donald Trump and Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Stephen Hahn (right) met with Daniel O'Day (left) CEO of Gilead Sciences when Rendezvous received an emergency use authorization in May.  

Well, isn't this something?  When everybody was screaming "Early treatment, early treatment," it turns out that Gilead was the approved early treatment sanctioned by the FDA for use against the coronavirus.  In fact, it was the first drug to receive that status.  Two weeks after already sealing a deal worth $1 billion, Gilead, the owners of Remdesivir, got approval against COVID.

Two weeks later, on 22 October, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved remdesivir for use against the pandemic coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 in the United States—the first drug to receive that status. The EU and U.S. decisions pave the way for Gilead's drug into two major markets, both with soaring COVID-19 cases. 

How in the world could the FDA approve Remdesivir after the failed trials?  Dr. Bryan Ardis says that Remdesivir was a bust.  It increases death by 3%, and increases renal failure by 20%.  

Dr. T is one of the so-called “disinformation dozen“ across US mainstream media and in every language as they targeted the 12 of us including Bobby Kennedy, Dr. Mercola, yours truly, because we reached more people than anyone with the Truth. pic.twitter.com/2yVzQ97Wbt

— Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News 🙌 (@unhealthytruth) June 20, 2023

And how is it killing the immune system this is really important the Pfizer shot because of the way they created it synthetically allows the messenger RNA to pass inside your cells and be replicated indefinitely by the ribosomes.  So you cannot get it out of your body.  So there's no detoxing from it.  Now can you detox your body and make yourself overall healthier? Yes. Are you going to eliminate the spike protein or the antibodies of the spike protein or the stupid monoclonal antibodies that they're advocating?  No.  Because you sensitize your dendritic cells and your B cells so spikes are going to be there probably forever the messenger RNA oblates, wipes out, destroys toll-like receptors 3, 7, and 8.  Toll-like receptors are like little radars that are constantly vigilantly looking around and getting rid of viruses and bacteria and things that don't belong there.  They are our innate God-given, what we're born with, immune system.  The messenger RNA shots destroy toll-like receptors 3, 7, and 8 which is our first line of primary defense, making us more susceptible to getting Covid.  And this is why all the people who get the shots suddenly are sick because they're more susceptible.  We know the mechanisms.  Doctors are illiterate and not reading it.  We know that people getting the shots are more likely to get sick and more likely to get hospitalized.  And if they're in the hospital and they get Remdesivir and they're put on a ventilator, that's a greater than 80% mortality rate.  We know the mechanism: the Spike protein enters the nucleus of our cells and binds to our DNA, so anybody who says it doesn't irreversibly bind to your DNA,  they're wrong.  They are not reading the scientific literature.  And when it binds to the DNA, it blocks the door and starts making it into an abnormal cell that if that cell replicates it'll turn into cancer.  And then it bars the door, it blocks the door, and doesn't allow our God-given immune system repair enzymes to come and repair the damage the spike protein has caused.  Hence, that allows cancer to form and . . . why we are seeing . . . and Dr. Ryan Cole has talked about this a lot . . . why are we seeing this explosion of cancers in people that get these shots.  People that have been in remission have been treated have been in remission and said they don't have cancer anymore suddenly they are exploding with endometrial cancer, all kinds of blood cancers, lymphatic cancers, breast cancer from the shots and we know the mechanism.  It's not a guess.  New data came out in the last two weeks that if a person is injected, they are 8.12 times more likely to be infected with Omicron. Again, suppression of your immune system, suppression of your white blood cells, oblation of your toll-like receptors the more shots you get the more you destroy your immune system in the faster that happens

REMDESIVIR: "Run Death Is Near”

14 California Families Sue 3 Hospitals for Deadly Remdesivir Protocol

Remdesivir is so lethal it got nicknamed “Run Death Is Near” after killing thousands of C19 patients.

“Expect other lawsuits to follow because the Remdesivir carnage was nationwide.”  https://t.co/n8trcXhbeW

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) May 30, 2023

"He threw a phony, contrived, absolutely fraudulent study that he manipulated and orchestrated to make that drug 'standard of care.' It is homicide"

.@RobertKennedyJr: "Tony Fauci Knew That Remdesivir Would Kill You"

"How does it kill you?" he asked. "Kidney failure, heart failure, and all-organ collapse."

"All the doctors said. You heard it again and again. 'We've never seen a virus that attacks the kidneys.' Because it… pic.twitter.com/jqcN1cHY3k

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) April 23, 2023

JAMES OSTROWSKI SHOWS YOU HOW TO FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST OFFICIALS WHO ENFORCED MANDATES

Thank you to Dr. Naomi Wolf at Daily Clout.  

Identify the perpetrators.  Identify the crimes, their crimes, not just so that they can be punished but

Criminal law is one of the areas where citizens can actually get involved in the investigative process and have a little more control over finding out what happened and what to do about it  

advantages of using criminal law versus civil law

How to file a request to investigate.  

The potential risks of filing a request to investigate, are because there are some risks and downsides and we've worked those into our forms to minimize that risk, and we'll get into that very quickly.   

An overview of some of the main criminal statutes.  And an overview of potential remedies in international law.  and then finally a proposal for how citizens can take charge of the whole process in investigating these crimes.  

TABLE OF CRIMES

1.   Threatening of medical personnel and doctors.

2.  Threatening medical professionals with disciplinary action for making reasonable treatment decisions.  That may be coercion under state law.  

3.  Many doctors were threatened for just speaking out, which could be a violation of their 1st Amendment rights.  That's actually a crime. 

4.  The stay-at-home orders and the lockdowns that caused enormous suffering around the planet may be a crime under international law and U.S. federal law.

5.  Applying treatments that are likely to cause death or serious injuries, such as Remdesivir, over-use of ventilators, and vaccines themselves, could be, if the facts showed it, a criminally negligent homicide.  Deliberately withholding treatments may also be a criminally negligent homicide.

6.  Mask mandates--endangering the welfare of children.

7.  Vaccine mandates, again, with respect to children

Did Malone and Callahan’s “Famotadine” study at Columbia stack up 236 dead bodies at hospitals in Brooklyn between February 25th and April 13th, 2020? Does Famotidine really mean Remdesivir?

glad to see you back after your long hiatus! Wondering if you’ve seen this yet, thinking you’re the best at breaking this down https://t.co/11SnbdmGF2

— Kim Jones (@KimJone04052805) April 6, 2023

Malone worked for a company called Aeras and for Dynport or DynCorp.  

Definitely a bizarre and interesting connection with Steven Hatfill.  

Dr. Meryl Nass has this to say about Hatfill,

Now it turns out that Bruce was one of several scientists the justice department turned its spotlight on, after Hatfill succeeded in not only getting them to leave him alone, but also pay him for destroying his (admittedly tawdry) reputation. Bruce was a gentle guy, the opposite of Hatfill. While Hatfill stirred up a cauldron of controversy, held press conferences and initiated many legal efforts (I was subpoenaed as a witness for his case against the New York Times), Bruce got depressed. Then killed himself, apparently.

Wikipedia gives a little background on Hatfill:

In 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, Hatfill was interviewed on several right-wing media outlets including Stephen Bannon’s War Room: Pandemic,^[69] The Epoch Times, and Sinclair Broadcast Group’s Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson.^[70] He opposed the U.S. response to the pandemic, particularly the exclusion of hydroxychloroquine for early treatment of COVID-19, making unproven claims that the low fatality rate experienced by some nations is the result of their early use of the drug.^[71]

In February 2020 Hatfill became an unpaid "volunteer" advisor to White House trade director Peter Navarro on the subject of the coronavirus pandemic. He interacted directly with senior officials at the Department of Health and Human Services, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the White House, and he represented the administration in dealings with health care companies. Early in the pandemic he urged Navarro to quickly acquire tests and supplies, although he said such supplies should come only from U.S. sources. In an email to White House chief of staff Mark Meadows he said the president was being "grossly misadvised" by the White House Coronavirus Task Force, and recommended that the virus should be fought by widespread proactive administration of hydroxychloroquine, a malaria drug which the FDA had declared ineffective and potentially harmful to use for coronavirus.^[11][72] He repeatedly attacked Anthony Fauci and FDA commissioner Steven Hahn, at one point telling Fauci that he was "full of crap". Although the two were not removed from the task force as he urged, they were increasingly sidelined by Donald Trump.^[11]

"We knew we were going to kill people. That's premeditated murder. We knew we were going to do it, and we went along with it anyway"

'We Murdered People': Remdesivir – The Pseudomedicine Death Warrant for American Citizens

"It [Remdesivir] was so deadly that The WHO itself pulled the drug from consideration for Ebola treatments," denoted Dr. David Martin.

"We let that publication of information in 2018 fail… pic.twitter.com/yBoPi5zdbC

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) March 24, 2023

Reveals a 2019 NIH study on Remdesivir WAS STOPPED because ‘53-86% of the patients died’..

If you want to improve care at your local hospitals, attend the hospital board meetings and put in for certain therapies.  If not, then either take what they give you or stay home and do self-care.   

JUST IN: Ann Vandersteel slams Sarasota memorial hospital board — DEMANDS protocols be changed on Remdesivir immediately..

Reveals a 2019 NIH study on Remdesivir WAS STOPPED because ‘53-86% of the patients died’..

Read that twice..

-Chuck Callesto pic.twitter.com/0es9QghYzL

— Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News 🙌 (@unhealthytruth) March 22, 2023

Her name is Ann Vandersteel, and you may be familiar with many of her Rumble interviews with key voices that have HELPED people understand COVID, vaccines, politics, and money behind these mandated measures.

DR. BRYAN ARDIS ON REMDESIVIR: "That's because the virus wasn't doing it."

In May 2020 Dr Fauci lied about the 2019 Remdesivir Ebola trial in Africa and he lied about
the 3 month Remdesivir Covid trial March 2020.
It was approved.
Then Drs in New York said,
"We have never seen this amount of acute kidney failure when we treat a respiratory virus"
Hmmm pic.twitter.com/uqIAPoIEbj

— RefugeOfSinners (ROS) (@RefugeOfSinner5) February 11, 2023

American Healthcare: Like a Good Neighbor . . .

I'm sure this has never happened to anybody you know.  Maybe one way to fix this is to begin having family dinners.  And talk. Maybe more important, to listen.

The doctors, in this case, gave her father Remdesivir.  And then the staff blamed her for her father's death because was not vaccinated.

A friend's mom died in the hospital from Remdesivir.  

Also, the great street theater comedian, Alex Stein, specifically told his mom's doctors not to give her Remdesivir. What did her doctors do?  They gave her  Remdesivir against his, and hers, specific orders.  I'll let you guess the outcome.

Share this and make your own video. IT'S TIME.   https://t.co/dQrOLkacpf

— Jessica Rose (@JesslovesMJK) February 8, 2023

"I did everything I could to protect her but I still couldn't protect her from these evil people that murdered her"

Here is the interview.

Hospitals were getting a $39,000 dollar kickback for putting patients on a ventilator, so when we said we didn't want her on a ventilator or her to be given Remdesivir, whatsoever, they immediately made a sign, DNR, Do Not Resuscitate.  So they knew that my mother was going to die, so for people complaining at home, you know, the arm-chair conspiracy theorists, they want people to die because this is the problem: they were not able to get Emergency Use Authorization on the vaccine if there is any sort of remedy for COVID0-19.  If there's any available remedy.  Now, you can technically call Ivermectin an available remedy.  Because of that, because Ivermectin actually works against COVID-19, it would have negated the vaccine, they denied people like my mother Ivermectin.  And then they use Remdesivir when they know from the studies that half the people die from the trials, they gave it to people like my mother behind our back, knowing they had the legal liability to give it to her whatever they wanted because that was the government protocol for COVID, so they murdered my mom right in front of my face slowly . . . .  

She died on October 21, 2021, thirteen days after his birthday.  Really sad.  I still have the last gifts my mother gave me--the notes and cards.  She was my biggest fan, watched all the stuff, and then 2 weeks later, she's dead.  Life is fragile.  I didn't expect to lose my mom.  She did everything.  She wore a mask.  She got vaccinated because she would have lost care from her doctor, she didn't even tell me about it, only told her sister.  She didn't even want me to know because I was so anti-vaxx.  So once again, they killed with the vaxx, they killed her with Remdesivir, they killed her with the protocols.    

My mom was in an accident when I was younger, and my mom was on disability, I took care of my mom, I took care of my mom.  I TOOK CARE of my mom, that's why I feel immense guilt.  I did everything I could to protect her but I still couldn't protect her from these evil people that murdered her.

How could you give her Remdesivir when we both told you not to give it to her?  Did they wait until she was asleep and then give it to her?  Did you figure out how they gave it to her without her consent?  I was very lucky to be in the room with her for 4 hours a day of visitation.  But, Dan, there are so many wires, so much stuff going in and out of there.  And because of intubation, they have what is called a C-Pap machine almost, it just blows in the air.  It was very uncomfortable.  One is Remdesivir, and one is steroids, I don't know.  It doesn't matter.  We told them no Remdesivir, no Remdesivir whatsoever.  My mom was fine.  The only reason she went to the hospital is that she was that she got it too fast, she hit her head and almost fainted.  She did not really even want to go to the hospital.  Long story, short, she called the hospital, and they told her that her breathing is fine.  And the second time, she got up so fast she hit her head and got nervous, thinking that she should go into the hospital because she'd never fainted like that before.  And the next thing you know, those first two days she and I were sitting there, having a conversation, drinking McDonald's milkshakes, and once they started administering Remdesivir, my mom's entire organs filled up with fluid and she died in my arms 5 days later.  

And when you asked to give her Ivermectin at Baylor University Hospital, 

They had 11 different cords going into my mother, they told you it wasn't part of the protocol because it wasn't part of the government, or what was their excuse?  They looked at me like I was a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist like I was They may as well have thought I was QAnon when I asked for that in that hospital. 

The worst of it all was when I was talking about Ivermectin, they had the police escort me out because those nurses were so nervous because those nurses said I was going to do something to them after my mom died.  I'm just saying that's how they treated me.  I would never hurt a nurse, but they were so nervous because they were treating me like absolute crap, like I was an anti-vaxxer, making me feel guilty while I was watching my mom die.  The last thing I'm going to say is nothing scares me, Dan.  When I go into a protest with Antifa, I could care less.  I watched my mom die.  I was so scared to go to that hospital every single day.  So nothing will ever be as bad as 

John Zingsheim survived a 10-month stay in the hospital after finally being treated with Ivermectin.