"Against our wishes . . ."

Hep B Vaccine at birth Utterly Destroyed Our Twin Boys https://t.co/ew2tB674yo

— Children’s Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) December 7, 2023

00:40. I took the flu shot when I was pregnant with the twins.  Thankfully, that was the only one.  Took the TDAP and the flu shot with my first son, but was told because I'd had it I didn't need it again.  So the flu shot was the only one, so thankful that I didn't get the COVID shot because I was pregnant when they just were rolling out, and because they're twins we had to see a fraternal medical specialist and he tried to push the COVID vaccine on me and I declined and I'm not sure that they would be here today had I would have gotten that.

1:21. So how are they born, did you have a normal birth?

Yeah.  I had a repeat C-section they were scheduled they induce me at 37 weeks probably would have kept on cooking if it hadn't interrupted them but because they were Mono-Di twins, meaning that they had one placenta but two sacks, it's considered high risk, so I was monitored very closely but the pregnancy was perfect.  

They set you down the first appointment that you have like the fetal medicine specialist and they tell you everything that could go wrong and nothing went wrong.  They were born 06 pounds at 37 weeks, latched right away, I breastfed, and . . . 

2:10. Healthy?  Declared healthy? 

2:11. Healthy . . . yeah.. Healthy.  Declared healthy.  Perfect Apgar Scores.  Nothing was the matter.

2:15. Two beautiful healthy boys at birth, both latching.  It's really important because we don't have very long before they get the Hep B, correct?

2:24. Right.  They got their first dose at 4pm against our wishes.  When medical issues started arising we did start pulling their medical records.  At the time of birth, we signed a form to decline the Hepatitis B shot.  Somebody once told me that being born was traumatic enough, so why put them through shots?  I wasn't against it at the time, but that stuck with me . . . we thought we were protecting them . . . it turns out they gave them a shot against her wishes.  Not only did they give them a shot, they gave them the adolescent dose.  At 4 p.m. the day that they were born, per our medical records, they were given the shot even though it clearly says  "parents declined" in our records.  It was ordered in the pharmacy, and, of course, we didn't know.  We didn't know they had been given the Hepatitis B vaccine.  So we left the hospital thinking they had not been vaccinated.  We were going to get their first set of vaccines at their first "Well Baby" visit, which they did.  They got their first set of vaccines at their first Well-Baby visit, but, ironically, the day that they went in for their first Well-Baby visit, their body temperature was so dangerously low, probably from their first shot [Hep B vaccine] that we had no idea that they got and they were reacting.  They gave them the shot that day, and again we had no idea that they did it.  When we took them to the pediatrician's office, what three days after they were born, it was 96 hours later, they were struggling to maintain their body temperature.  So the pediatrician just kind of brushed it off . . . it's probably because the building is cold, or we didn't have them dressed right.  So we couldn't leave the pediatrician's office until we raised their body temperature.  So just through bundling them up, we raised it and then we vaccinated them and we went home and a couple of days later they just started getting really constipated [Interesting that the first sign the mom notes that they're ill is their bowel movements, which Ivermectin resolves.]. And we have two older kids so it's not like we don't know what kids are like we knew something wasn't right.  So, back and forth with the pediatrician, saying something is going on, we don't know what it is, they're constipated, they're having issues with their bowel, weird stuff was coming out; sending her pictures, she just kept brushing it off.  So, then we went and they got vaccinated again with the Hepatitis B again by this point it was their fourth we didn't know 

5:39. Please tell me how you got to that state, why did they get vaccinated again?  

5:42. Because we didn't know yet, we hadn't woken up.

Is it normal to have that many Hepatitis Bs?

5:50. No.  You get the one at birth, and then you get the 2-month shot.  They gave the one at the hospital on accident [the one against their wishes].  Yeah, we didn't know it until "the one at birth" was given at the pediatrician's office, and then they were given their 2-month.  So they got their second dose, and 22 days later, Ralph started having seizures.

Ivermectin, the drug once labeled “horse de-wormer,” is now showing 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action.

Fenbendazole is emerging as a “miracle drug” for cancer, and it’s Big Pharma’s worst nightmare.   https://t.co/jY5P1AQa23

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) November 7, 2023

ATTY TOM RENZ: Dr Mercola just put out a paper where he discussed ventilators. That concept for ventilators came from China

#3 - “No one told the patients, hey, you’re going to be put on this vent. It’s probably going to kill you, but it may protect the healthcare workers,” testified attorney @RenzTom to the Pennsylvania State Senate earlier this year. “No one told the families that.” pic.twitter.com/Tk8t1f7iY1

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) November 1, 2023

And she has audio recordings of a conversation between her and a nurse I recently publicized.  The nurse is talking about how they're killing people in the hospital, how their floor was doing the things that no other floor would do because, well, no other floor wanted to carry out the murder essentially.  They knew what was happening in a lot of cases.  Dr. Mercola just put out a paper where he discussed ventilators.  Ventilators, that concept for ventilators came from China.  If you put a ventilator on someone's face, they can't cough on you, so we'll keep the healthcare worker safe, right?

Even though that we knew that 75% or so of the people in New York City put on ventilators were dying, we kept doing it to protect the healthcare workers.  That was the theory.  Now no one talked about that when the patients were going in there.  there.  No one told the patients, "Hey, you're being protected . . .  you're going to be put on this.  this.   It's probably going to kill you, but it may protect the healthcare workers.  No one told the families that.  And by the way, we actually had whistleblower testimony from a yet-to-be unmasked whistleblower, and probably won't be, who worked from CMS.  I've got data from CMS that showed in a number of Texas hospitals that as high as 90% of patients put on the vent died.  90%.  Now they wouldn't let you try Ivermectin but they were more than willing to put you on the vent where you had a 90% fatality rate you're telling me that they didn't notice the you're telling me that the doctors on those floors I mean listen you know I can't say all doctors are created equal McCullough is ahead above most.  But if you got through med school,  you could probably . . . I would think you would probably be smart enough to notice that when 9 out of 10 of your patients and when they're put on the vent die, at least maybe you should ask the question, Is there a better way?  Why not let someone try Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine if you have a 9 out of 10 chance of dying anyways?

The reason that that's dear to my heart is because the people called me and I fought with hospital after hospital after hospital to try and save their lives.  And as I testified last year here, we essentially legislated these deaths into being by incentivizing the use of Remdesivir in protocols incentivizing the use of ventilators, and incentivizing, again not people recovering from COVID but people dying from COVID.  You got a cash bonus when someone died from COVID.  So it was and incentive to kill people and it worked incredibly well.  I'm happy to revisit that but again my testimony from last year covered that.  

SV-40 did not cause cancer in its natural host, an Asian monkey. But what it would do in another primate that had never been exposed to it, one whose immune system had not been sensitized to SV-40?

Anybody citing the polio virus as a standard of medicine or a standard of medical success ought to be outright laughed out of the room.  It was a disaster, whose consequences have been censored.  Unless you read about it in Edward T. Haslam's Dr. Mary's Monkey, 2007.

For the rest of the story please see: pic.twitter.com/XZHgpuWUCY

— Dr. Janci (@JanciToxDoc) October 25, 2023

Page 206:

Before long yells laboratory discovered that the polyoma virus that had produced the cancer in Stewart's mice and hamsters turned out to act like Simeon virus number 40, SV-40, a monkey virus that causes cancer.

Page 207:

In June 1959, Bernice Eddy who was still officially assigned to the flu vaccine project, began thinking about the polio vaccine again.  This time she was worried about something much deeper than polio.  The vaccine manufacturers had grown their polioviruses on the kidneys of monkeys.  And when they removed the polio virus from the monkey's kidneys, they also removed an unknown number of other monkey viruses.  The more they looked, the more they found.  The medical science of the day knew little about the behavior or consequences of these monkey viruses.  But times were changing.  Confronted with mounting evidence that some monkey viruses caused cancer, Eddy grew suspicious of the polio vaccine and asked an excruciating question: have they inoculated an entire generation of Americans with cancer-causing monkey viruses?  She conducted her research quietly, without alerting her NIH supervisors.

In October 1960, one month before the Kennedy/Nixon Presidential debate, Eddy gave a talk to the New York Cancer Society and, without warning NIH in advance, announced that she had examined monkey kidney cells in which the polio virus was grown and had found they were infected with cancer-causing viruses parent location was clear there were cancer-causing monkey viruses in the polio vaccine.  This was tantamount to forecasting an epidemic of cancer in America.  When the word got back to her NIH bosses, they exploded.  No suggestion of cancer-causing monkey viruses in the polio vaccine was welcomed at NIH.  When the cussing stopped, they crushed Bernice Edd professionally.

Page 208: 

They took her took away her lab, destroyed her animals, put her under a gag order, and prevented her from attending professional meetings, and delayed publication of her scientific papers.  In the words of Edward Shorter, author of The Health Century, 1987, "Her treatment became a scandal within the scientific community."  Later it became the subject of a Congressional inquiry.  In the words of Dr. Lawrence Killham, a fellow NIH researcher who wrote a letter of protest to the U.S. Surgeon General's office, "The presence of a cancer virus in the polio vaccine is the matter demanding full investigation." And further: "Dr. Eddy's case, to many of us, represents a somewhat Prussian-like attempt to hinder an outstanding scientist."

Eddy, however, was not the only one who investigated the issue.  A viral specialist named Lorella McClellan, working for vaccine developer Maurice Hilleman in Philadelphia, found similar problems in the polio vaccine.  vaccine.  The essence of the problem was the SV-40 did not cause cancer in its natural host, an Asian monkey.  But what it would do in another primate that had never been exposed to it, one whose immune system had not been sensitized to SV-40?

FYI, the ticket for treating cancer really is Ivermectin.

Dr. Mary's Monkey: How the Unsolved Murder of a Doctor, a Secret Laboratory in New Orleans and Cancer-Causing Monkey Viruses Are Linked to Lee Harvey ... Assassination and Emerging Global Epidemics, Edward T. Haslam, 2007.

Ivermectin testimonials

My sweet heart has gotten flu twice in the last two years. Both times took IVM as her temp hit about 103. About 6 hrs later she was 100%. It's crazy how it stops flu. Took my son a couple days to shut down covid when he got it. But still pretty quick.

— Shrodingersdog🐭 (@gmcgary) October 21, 2023

Gulags are here, as pro Trump meme maker is sentenced to 7 months in federal prison for a joke

Gulags are here, as pro Trump meme maker is sentenced to 7 months in federal prison for a joke. Rule is law is on the way out. Within 5-10 years, we won’t have a legal system. Stalin is smiling down on his demon “judges.” https://t.co/e7fQeDaEaI

— Cernovich (@Cernovich) October 18, 2023

Can't talk about early treatments for COVID-19.

Can't talk about health benefits or anticancer benefits of Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, or Fenbendozale. 

Can't talk about vaccine ingredients.

Can't talk about vaccine injuries.

Can't talk about U.S. and NATO's role in starting the war in Ukraine.

Can't talk about the millions of migrants crossing into the U.S. illegally or under the guise of a refugee.

Can't talk about the erosion of privacy.

Can't talk about the U.S. government acting like a banana republic, persecuting and prosecuting political opponents or about $33 trillion dollars of debt or how hundreds of billions of dollars in spending bills are buried in annual omnibus bills.

Can't talk about poisonous genetic material and DNA plasmids in Pfizer vaccines.

Can't talk about the differences between men and women. 

Can't talk about the economic and cultural degradation of American society.

Can't tell jokes.

Everything, everything has become a 1st Amendment issue.

Here's the story.  

They buried a life-saving drug so that they, meaning the FDA, could on behalf of vaccine makers, get an EUA on the vaccines all the while cheap and effective Ivermectin was pushed off the radar

Pharma needs expensive products to sell to as many people as possible and will bury anything that competes with it.

This excellent short film shows how Ivermectin a miracle drug that saved lives was buried by everyone because it threatened the COVID industry (and the vaccines). pic.twitter.com/j3gr1LWJbL

— Pierre Kory, MD MPA (@PierreKory) October 17, 2023

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? - 9 Papers Reviewed

Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? - 9 Papers Reviewed https://t.co/mPWUUbWVtv

— Kelly DNP🩺 Functional/Integrative Med (@kacdnp91) October 17, 2023

Papers reviewed:

• 2023 Sep.23 - Man-Yuan Li et al - Ivermectin induces nonprotective autophagy by downregulating PAK1 and apoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma cells
• 2023 May - Samy et al - Eprinomectin: a derivative of ivermectin suppresses growth and metastatic phenotypes of prostate  cancer cells by targeting the β-catenin signaling pathway
• 2022 Nov - Lotfalizadeh et al - The Anticancer potential of Ivermectin: Mechanisms of action and therapeutic implications
• 2022 Oct - Jian Liu et al - Progress in Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Antitumour Effects of Ivermectin
• 2022 Jun - Daeun Lee et al - Ivermectin suppresses pancreatic cancer via mitochondria dysfunction
• 2021 Aug - Shican Zhou et al - Ivermectin has New Application in Inhibiting Colorectal Cancer Cell Growth
• 2021 Jan - Mingyang Tang et al - Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug
• 2019 Sep Intuyod et al - Anti-parasitic Drug Ivermectin Exhibits Potent Anticancer Activity Against Gemcitabine-resistant Cholangiocarcinoma In Vitro
• 2018 Feb - Juarez et al - The multitargeted drug ivermectin: from an antiparasitic agent to a repositioned cancer drug

44 drugs CONTRAINDICATED with Paxlovid . . . including statins. ZERO drugs contradicted with Ivermectin

44 drugs CONTRAINDICATED with Paxlovid… including statins. 0 drugs contradicted with Ivermectin. pic.twitter.com/ShJuIBLxAc

— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) October 9, 2023

Ivermectin weakens the blood brain barrier?

nicotinic acid activates the gpr109a receptor and repletes nad+. The side effects of ivermectin are always glossed over. It weakens the blood brain barrier. The increased permeability is not something you want. NA makes those with a lot of inflammation turn slightly red.

— Knut Hamsun (@Broken8iron) October 6, 2023

Caught on Tape: CVS Pharmacist in Midlothian TX Blocks Ivermectin Prescription

More and more recordings of pharmacists refusing to fill prescriptions are coming out. How much damage did the FDA’s ridiculous “Horse” tweet do?

Many pharmacists have chosen to follow the crowd rather than do their own research. How many patients have died as a result?   https://t.co/1KJaDJ5A2X

— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) September 27, 2023

CVS pharmacist in Midlothian, Texas refuses to fulfill an order for prescribed Ivermectin, which is safer than Tylenol.  

Direct Primary Care and Direct Specialty Care: Transparent and affordable concierge care

If we let the FDA’s social media campaign against Ivermectin slide, it merely emboldens them, allowing them to have a tighter grip on the doctor-patient relationship going forward. Full interview in comments. pic.twitter.com/np5uFGtEdT

— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) September 24, 2023

It's called the Pay-4-Performance Program.  Catchy title, eh?  And doctors are financially ding'd if they don't follow the checklist.  And I'll bet that you chose your doctor because you thought you were getting Harvard-grade medical education, didn't you? Physicians who take Medicare are actually required to participate in the program.  Wow, thank you, LBJ.

The Physician P4P program offers performance-based incentives to qualified high-volume physicians and higher-volume Community Clinics that provide high-quality preventive and chronic care to L.A. Care members. 

Dr. Mary Talley Bowden explains that she's opted out of Medicare.  She calls herself Third-Party Free, where she does not take any Medicare patients.  She exAthains that she doesn't take any orders from the government.  Doesn't take any orders from insurance companies or any orders from hospitals.  Wow.  The only people I work for are my patients.  There's a great movement happening, called Direct Primary Care and Direct Specialty Care, which goes along with these premises.  It's cash only but it's transparent and affordable concierge care.  So you can have insurance, but save your insurance for catastrophic care . . . , but for your everyday needs, paying cash and seeing doctors NOT TIED TO THE SYSTEM is a much better way to go.  

You don't have an employee dealing with insurance companies.  You get to spend more time with your patients, so I spend 45 minutes with each patient who comes in new.  Patient satisfaction is so much higher.

Is it more economical to go to cash-only doctors?

One good example is patients who need ear tubes, ear tubes for a chronic ear infection. If you see need and the total price includes anesthesia, surgery center, and surgeon, it's $3,000. If you go to Texas Children and ask them for a cash price, $10,000.

Another example is in the clinic as an ENT we look at people's noses and sinuses with an  endoscope.  Under the insurance model, patients would oftentimes get a bill for $400 for that endoscopic examination.  For $300, the patient can see me as a new patient, a follow-up patient is less expensive than a new patient, but the endoscopic exam is included. So there's no surprise billing, and they can also shop around. The problem is no one knows . . . the doctors that take insurance, they don't display their cash prices, so . . . and I see a lot of patients that have very high deductibles, so they are functionally uninsured; they are basically paying cash unless they have catastrophic care.  And so there's a need for more transparency with outpatient care so the patient can shop around.  there's a need for more transparency so the patients can shop around.

Ginny Head adds, 

We CANNOT forget Fauci pulled this same crap in the 1980s with doxycycline in the treatment of polycystic pneumonia in AIDS patients! He said it was not researched, just as he did with Ivermectin. He had to get his AZT instead just like the COVID-19 vaccines!

TOXICOLOGIST, JANCI LINDSAY: We never needed these vaccines. We had treatments that worked: Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. I can tell you as a toxicologist, they are not toxic.

Dr. Janci Lindsay testifies before the South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee on DHEC, on September 15, 2023.. 

Why was SV40, a cancer causing sequence, put in the Covid Vaccine?

Because Cancer is the Medical Industrial Complex’s #1 money maker.

Now, 20 year olds are getting turbo cancer, and those who were once in remission have had their cancer come back 10x worse.

It was all… pic.twitter.com/DyxTzOTKMo

— DiedSuddenly (@DiedSuddenly_) September 20, 2023

Get Ivermectin.   The full 18-minute presentation is excellent.  Dr. Phillip Buckhaults presented first.  He really defends the vaccine.  Kind of shocking.  So now, as of Wednesday, March 13, 2024, that video of Buckhaults is removed.  

SABOTAGE

Listen all y'all > https://t.co/zNvRUaAKJ8

— Janiesaysyay (@janiesaysyay) March 13, 2024

A TALE OF TWO DRUGS: How the U.S. government demonized Ivermectin after India, in only six weeks, reduced Covid 19 cases by 97% in Uttar Pradesh.

A tale of two drugs, how the government demonized Ivermectin after India, in only six weeks, reduced Covid 19 cases by 97% in Uttar Pradesh. pic.twitter.com/BSXCUygaTg

— Green Eggs-n-Sam (@HamEggsnSam) September 16, 2023

Dr. Eads explains that the combination of Ivermectin, Fenbendozale, and B-17 works to kill several common cancers.  Give it a quick read or listen. 

Important facts on Ivermectin. 

Where to source it from?  From India or Tennessee.  This Indian company promises it within 7 days, which kind of answers a lot of people's complaints about ordering from India.  I have not used that particular Indian vendor, but I have used ReliableRx, and I have not had any problems with them.  

DR. CALLS PHARMACY ON IVERMECTIN: Ignorant pharmacists hang up on us. Don’t know @US_FDA rules. Don’t know medicine. Don't know laws. Don’t know drug interactions. Sell Paxlovid.

This is what doctors get when we call the pharmacies.

Ignorant pharmacists hang up on us,
Don’t know @US_FDA rules
Don’t know medicine, dont know laws. don’t know drug interactions, sell Paxlovid.

While we listen to vaccine ads for EUA shots on their hold music.

It’s… https://t.co/rPe1IRl9HJ

— Dr Mollie James (@molsjames) September 16, 2023

Ibuprofen is more dangerous than ivermectin

Ibuprofen is more dangerous than ivermectin.  https://t.co/0fUJh9mQVH

— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) September 6, 2023

In March of 2020, Birx and Dr. Anthony Fauci were grinning like Cheshire Cats with Duper's Delight as they laid out an unprecedented lockdown strategy which Birx later admitted they pulled out of their asses.

Given how health officials [I would never call them experts, nor would I call a doctor expert; no, I would call them order followers, like good little Nazis.  Seriously] had said one thing, and then changed their statements weeks or months later, then claiming that they didn't have all the science, while claiming in the other breath that we've got the science when they want you to follow them verbatim, I wouldn't trust anything that they say even if what they say lines up with your values or convictions.  What's the phrase, "Opt out"?  Do that.  But it is fun and interesting to see the crooks dance around on hot coals.  

The trial balloons were clearly shot down out of the sky with .22s #DoNotComply #ZeroFscksGiven  https://t.co/3mRI2gWCrN

— Tom Luongo (Head Sneetch) (@TFL1728) September 4, 2023

Here's the link to the ZeroHedge article.

In March of 2020, Birx and Dr. Anthony Fauci were grinning like Cheshire Cats with Duper's Delight as they laid out an unprecedented lockdown strategy which Birx later admitted they pulled out of their asses. 

By the way, if you're not familiar with the term Duper's Delight, here's a definition, 

Duping delight is a micro-expression that betrays a person's enjoyment of controlling and deceiving another person. It is a form of body language reserved for pathological character types such as psychopaths. Psychopaths are obsessed with control and power over others, and they often display duping delight when lying to others.0 Duping delight can manifest through subtle facial expressions, body language, or vocal cues.1 It is hard to contain duping delight, and those who feel it want to share their accomplishments with others, seeking admiration for their exploits. 

More from ZeroHedge,

Now that we're revisiting mask mandates over the latest Covid-19 surge, Birx and Fauci are seemingly on different sides of the debate.

"We don't need to mandate," Birx told Newsmax on Saturday, in response to reports that an increasing number of hospitals and businesses are now requiring masks again.

"We need to actually empower people with the information that they need for themselves and their families because every family is different," she continued. "And by the way, outside is safe, and playgrounds are safe."  How is it that each and everyone of the health officials look so ugly.  

Paul Mango looks like Lon Chaney who played the phantom in the 1925 version of The Phantom of the Opera.

And Mango simply parrots what Birx said about information, but it's precisely the information that has formed the raging propaganda campaign in the war on the American people.  Again, how can anyone start to think that the information they the gov't officials have and WANT TO SHARE is of any value.  They pimped the promises of Remdesivir and others as they buried and demonized the true remedy of Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, and zinc.  Yet information is still buried.  We're still being lied to.  

MUST-LISTEN. DR. NASS ON W.H.O. TREATY & BIOWEAPONS

Del was amazing! The WHO Treaty draft wants every country to do surveillance for potential pandemic pathogens, perform genomic sequencing, do GOF research--then share what they discover! This is Insanity, maybe worse than WW3. https://t.co/yTcQ9wKmTI

— MERYL NASS, MD (@NassMeryl) September 2, 2023

Somebody above the level of our government is giving the orders.

The W.H.O. has become a trap to entrap the nations such that they lose sovereignty over health.

We are undergoing a soft coup.

And the idea is to create a whole new set of laws and ignore the existing human rights laws. 

Dr. Meryl Nass's license is currently suspended in the state of Maine.  "Maine doctor's license suspended over Covid-19 claims." The original reason was for spreading misinformation also for prescribing Ivermectin in hydroxychloroquine she took an oath to care for her patience and I guess they expect her to break that oath.  

Spreading misinformation?  Misinformation is not a crime. Misinformation is mistaken things, and I was actually telling the truth, so it wasn't any misinformation.  The federal government and the states are trying to make everybody think that misinformation is a crime, and you should be reporting doctors and professionals who are spreading this information. So strangers reported her to the board.  Oh she was spreading this information on the internet we have something called the First Amendment Free Speech as well as freedom of religion and the press and assembly and it's against the law for governments to suppress your free speech and the Board of Medicine is a state government agency so they were actually breaking the law and now we are suing them for a malicious prosecution which they used their role you know under cover of law "Doc Suspended for COVID Misinfo Sues, Cites Freedom of Speech," Michael DePeau-Wilson, Enterprise & Investigative Writer MedPage August 21, 2023.   You're actually suing the medical board and am I wrong, are you also suing every individual on the board . . . every individual in their personal capacity

In the FDA claimed when they were under oath that they never stopped anybody from using Ivermectin.  They said that you can use it whenever you want.  How is it a medical board is even allowed to say that it is misinformation and taking someone's license without scientific studies, peer-reviewed, double-blind, randomized controlled trials that I reckon was dangerous which would be difficult to do since Millions of people take it every year for lupus.

So it isn't illegal.  it's perfectly legal to prescribe those drugs, and the Board should have known that.  They had 3 lawyers on the board and a doctor on staff, and then they have about 8 doctors on the members.  So they all knew that they were writing off-label medicine.  A lot of doctors don't really understand the legal underpinnings of medicine.  By the time it came to a hearing, they dropped all of those charges.  They did not want to litigate against the First Amendment.  They did not want to litigate against off-label prescribing.  They said "We don't want to talk about the vaccine either.  Take the vaccine out of this case."  But they knew what the law was so they were heavying me, and I was supposed to roll over and give them a win that they could put in the national news, which my case went into the national news.  And I think they were shocked that I actually fought back.  That wasn't part of their equation.  I was 70 years old.  Clearly it was going to cost me more money than I would be able to make over the rest of my  career to compensate.  And Children's Health Defense said they would fund my defense.  That was what allowed me to do this. 

IVERMECTIN

I did write to BuyIvermectinForSale.us on January 7, 2024, about the different uses between Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, and I received this reply, 

Because Ivermectin is the best option for COVID-19 treatment, and Hydroxychloroquine is a prescription drug used to treat many autoimmune disorders. It was first used to treat malaria.

So that might help.   

Running low on your medication? Order a refill online and have it delivered to your home. #USA #UK #goodmoring #SaturdayVibes #SaturdayMorning

Site - https://t.co/qMfgpbOQra pic.twitter.com/fKE5WwzygE

— ivermectin-suppliers (@jams_caro) August 19, 2023

Get your Ivermectin from one of these Tennessee pharmacies. 

Not sure if this is kept up to date, but this is a good list to start your hunt for OTC IVM in TN 🧡 https://t.co/EuYb8T2SuL

— HarrietteTheSpy (@TheSpyHarriette) August 31, 2023

Buy Ivermectin, Ziverdo kit, and HCQS online

Another Ivermectin site from India. 

Another Indian supplier.  This place promises a 7-day shipment to the U.S.  Hard to know.  

INDIAN

GoodRx sells Ivermectin.

AMERICAN

Tennessee: The Phoenix Pharmacy, Knoxville, TN.  865-692-1603.  This place ships ONLY IN TENNESSEE and they only sell 3mg for $5/tablet.  That will get expensive.

Brand Name:

3mg: $5

6mg:

12mg:

Village Pharmacy OTC version requires a doctor assigned to that pharmacy with a collaborative agreement.  They do not ship out of state.  865-579-4547.  

Rocky Hill Pharmacy.  865-337-5887.  Have not called this pharmacy, because the gal at the Village Pharmacy suggested that I phone the pharmacies on the border, like Chattanooga and Nashville.  That page has no pharmacies listed in Chattanooga; a few in Nashville.  

Joshua Brown Pharmacy.   

FountainRx in Nashville.

Health & Wellness Compounding Pharmacy.  

Smokey Mountain Pharmacy.

In Chattanooga: 

Medicine Counter Pharmacy.  9-7; 10-2.  423-680-7373.  

Do you sell Ivermective w/o a prescription?  Yes, up until September 30, 2023.

Do you ship out of state?  Yes.

Brand name?  No brand name.  They compound it, meaning that they make it in-house. 

Dosage that you sell?  By weight.  Check their website.  gomedicinecounter.com  Click on the link below the Ivermectin capsule image.

Their website provides a dosage table by weight.  

Hamilton Discount Pharmacy.  9-7; 10-2.  423-892-5955.  

Stop-n-Go Discount Pharmacy. 8-8; 10-6.  423-468-7161.  

"The FDA is not your doctor. Their job is to approve drugs to the market and that's it. They should not be prohibiting drugs. They shouldn't be endorsing drugs. That's not their role, and that's the point of our lawsuit"

purpose of our lawsuit, to remind everybody that the FDA is not your doctor.  Their job is to approve drugs to the market and that's it.  They should be neutral.  They should not be prohibiting drugs.  They shouldn't be endorsing drugs. That's not their role, and that's the point of our lawsuit.  --Dr. Mary Talley Bowden.

“Overwhelming and irreversible damage.” We can’t fix the past but are hoping to prevent this from happening in the future. Thank you @EmeraldRobinson for having us on to talk about our lawsuit against the @US_FDA. @drpaulmarik1 https://t.co/Ga4lOo8nZY

— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) August 14, 2023

Three doctors who were fired for prescribing or promoting the cheap therapeutic drug, Ivermectin, for the treatment of Covid-19, asked the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals to revive a case that a federal judge dismissed back in December 2022.  

[The judge in this case is The Honorable Priscilla Richmond she's the chief judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.  The date of the hearing was August 8th 2023.]

During the hearing, a justice department attorney named Ashley Cheung Honold tried to defend the FDA's strong campaign against Ivermectin including this tweet where they tell people to just stop it to suggest that the only form of ivermectin comes as horse paste listen

They did not purport to require anyone to do anything or to prohibit anyone from doing what about when it said no stop it why isn't that a command that seems to me that if you were in an English class they would say that is a command stop it that is different than we are providing helpful information.

Your honor, the language that was used in these tweets were merely quips, and I don't think these quips change the substance of the FDA's statement as plaintiffs concede.

Is that a command, "Stop it"?

The tweets about the horse Ivermectin were intended to advise consumers that they should not use Ivermectin intended for animals and that this could be unsafe.

Here is the manipulative ad in question.

You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it. https://t.co/TWb75xYEY4

— U.S. FDA (@US_FDA) August 21, 2021

I'm sorry, can you answer the question, please?  Is that a command, "Stop it"?

Senator Ron Johnson took to Twitter about the about-face of the federal government when confronted with the actual law.  Senator Johnson pointed out that the government admitted in court that the doctors indeed have the authority to prescribe Ivermectin off-label.

Here the FDA was not regulating the off-label use of drugs.  These statements are not regulations.  They have no legal consequences.  They don't prohibit doctors from prescribing Ivermectin to treat Covid or for any other purpose.  Quite to the contrary, there are three incidences that I'd like to point the court to in the record that show that FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe Ivermectin to treat covid.

So then why are your patients still facing backlashes like this at the drug counter?  "Hi.  I had the same prescription filled at the other store."

Joining us now to discuss these huge developments in the case are two of the plaintiffs Dr. Paul Merrick and Dr. Mary Bowden.  Welcome to you both.  It's good to see you.  This was really big . . . the line of questioning and the struggle to answer from the government lawyer was just amazing.  I'll start with you, Dr. Bowden.  The main argument here is that the FDA admitted to regulating big Pharma.  It doesn't have the authority, though, right, to tell doctors what they can and cannot do, which they acknowledge in court, but if you talk to a doctor, which I did, some of them pretend as if their hands are tied, that they couldn't prescribe Ivermectin.

4:15. There's a misconception that the FDA has more power than they do I think.  The Judge pointed that out quite nicely.  She said, you know, "People believe that the FDA has this power, this right," and that's sort of the purpose of our lawsuit, to remind everybody that the FDA is not your doctor.  Their job is to approve drugs to the market and that's it.  They should be neutral.  They should not be prohibiting drugs.  They shouldn't be endorsing drugs. That's not their role, and that's the point of our lawsuit.

I was quite struck and I played this for my audience on Friday about the argument of sovereign immunity Dr. Merrick.  Essentially the FDA says that we can put out information that's not exactly correct, or that could even harm American citizens and that they have sovereign immunity.  How did you feel about that statement do you believe that's true?

5:19. Yeah, clearly that's absurd.  It means that they are allowed to do anything illegal under the pretense of sovereign immunity.  So let's be clear that the FDA has been on a campaign, a vigorous campaign to deface and dehumanize the use of Ivermectin, which is a safe effective medication, and as a result of this, as you saw in that clip, patients are being denied access to Ivermectin.  Physicians are losing their licenses because they prescribed Ivermectin.  So the misinformation that is being perpetuated by the FDA continues, and as Mary said that is beyond their jurisdiction.  They should not be interfering with the patient-physician relationship.  Their role is to approve drugs they are not in the business of practicing medicine and from the clips that you saw it seems that they're doing a rapid 360 about turns because clearly they made a mistake.

6:30. Yeah, clearly and it seemed like based on what I heard from the hearing, Dr. Bowden, that the judges will likely rule in your favor.  Where do you see this going?  Is the case going to be reinstated?

6:45. Well, unfortunately, the purpose of the lawsuit is basically to have them take down their tweets and take down the misinformation that they put on their website.  Our attorneys don't anticipate that we will get any sort of retraction, although I feel like that is warranted.  We are not seeking damages. Where this goes from here is at the appeal was over sovereign immunity so what may go back to the district court where then we have to prove standing so it's a little up in the air.

7:20. But the damage is already done.  Look if the information is out there. I tried to get Ivermectin for a different purpose than it's used for off-label and the doctor who was willing to prescribe it told me, "Look, don't take this to a local pharmacy.  You got to tell me what pharmacy you're going to take it to because I don't want to hurt my relationship with a pharmacy that I prescribe other medicines, you know, to my local patients."  And that's just absurd.  The damage is done.  If they don't issue a retraction or put out a statement, do you see this war on Ivermectin, Dr. Marick, ever ending, especially as we're we are being warned this other wave of Covid coming? 

8:00. So to speak, the horses are out of the barn already.  They have caused enormous damage.  As Mary said, the purpose of our suit is to prevent them from doing this going forward.  We can't have the FDA interfering with the practice of medicine and that's really the basis of our suit.  But you are correct: the damage that's been done is overwhelming and irreversible.  As you say there is this profound misconception that Ivermectin is horse paste, that it's made for horses, and that it's an unsafe medication.  And those two premises are completely false.  It is one of the safest medications on this planet.  And over 3 billion doses have been given to humans safely, so this is a highly effective medication.  It's exceedingly safe and the notion that it's a toxic horse dewormer is really complete Lee false and misinformation and so the FDA themselves are perpetuating false information and they're interfering with the patient physician relationship.

9:10. Dr Bowden before we end what can people do to help you all fight? 

9:15. Well we're in an information War so keeping the dialogue alive continuing to talk about it continuing to put the heat on the FDA to correct this continue to put the heat on our legislators.  If we lose this case it really emboldens the FDA so it's important and we need to keep talking about it.