TENNESSEE: Lettuce and Tomatoes Are Pharmaceuticals Now

"Republican Suggests Vaccines May Be Getting Injected into Lettuce," Nick Mordowanec, Newsweek, Friday, February 23, 2024.

WOW 🚨 A Lettuce Vaccine Bill Being Introduced

Health Committee, Tennessee Rep Scott Cepicky “University of California Riverside has already perfected the ability to put human vaccines into our lettuce right now. Also tomatoes has the ability to do that also for UC Berkeley. —… pic.twitter.com/RvXpq6Ae4N

— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) February 25, 2024

Rep. Scott Cepicky is introducing a bill, HB1894, to require labeling on produce with vaccines so that they know what's in the food.

Can you give me an example of a food that's a vaccine?

CEPICKY, 00:06.  University of California, Riverside has already perfected the ability to put human vaccines into our lettuce right now.  Tomatoes, it can do that also.  For UC Berkeley, Big Tobacco, RJ Reynolds, and stuff have perfected the ability to put a vaccine in tobacco products.  

CHAIRMAN JOHN RAY CLEMMONS, 00:26 Is that even legal to do in the state of Tennessee to sell those with a vaccine in them?

00:35. I'm not arguing that point what I'm saying is there is no law deeming that when you go into a grocery store you should know it's a consumer that this had a lettuce is a head of lettuce and the head of lettuce right next to it could contain a vaccine in it all we're saying is that if it does have a vaccine in it make sure it's listed as a pharmaceutical so people can get the proper dose.

CLEMMONS, 00:56. My question is right now can you walk into a grocery store and there be a head of lettuce for sale that has a vaccine in it.  I don't think it's allowed under state law presently, and if it is and you had to list it as a pharmaceutical, are we going to then have Walgreens' pharmacies with a refrigerated section?  I mean how is this going to play out?  

01:27. This is more of a consumer protection bill right here to make sure that when you go in to buy tomatoes and there's a polio vaccine in there that you are aware of what you're buying as a polio vaccine. The problem you have is if it's not treated as a pharmaceutical, being the size and difference between you and me, how many tomatoes do I have to eat to get the proper dosage versus how many tomatoes do you have to eat; and if you eat too many, do you get an overdose; if you eat too few like we had in the cattle industry with aureomycin, we weren't dosing our cattle properly and the horn flies were developing immunity to it if you don't have the proper dosage of a vaccine it could lead to the efficacy of that drug not work anymore.

CEPICKY, 02:08.  Talk to me about the lettuce bill for a second it came from a constituent who moved from California who is tied to UC Berkeley out there . . . "University of California Riverside has already perfected the ability to put human vaccines into our lettuce right now."  He brought this to my attention, and at first, it sounded absolutely incredible right, but then he produced all the documentation.  

Were [Paramilitary] Men In Black involved in 9/11?

[RG911Team] Were Men In Black involved in 9/11?

In our upcoming documentary series, 9/11 whistleblowers spill the beans on some very suspicious people that showed up at WTC Building 7 before it came down on 9/11. Who were they, and why were they there? pic.twitter.com/MOyzEHCOEl

— Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) February 25, 2024

Who is Patrick Dillon? 

"Anybody preventing access to the Fire Department in the event of a fire, that's a criminal act.  The Chief and I were not in a position to argue the point given the inequality in weaponry present." Richart Patterson, FDNY Fire Captain (Ret.)  

If you've got the stamina, you can listen/watch the full, 3-hour interview here.

Captain Patterson FDNY Spills the Beans on 9/11 [Full Video Available Now!] via Rokfin https://t.co/FfSxc0ZyQX #Rokfin

— St. Michael, the Archangel (@aveng_angel) February 25, 2024

"Jennifer Dailey-Provost [Utah-D] went so far as to assert that we couldn’t be “experts" on the subject because we were not from Utah???"

The bill isn't asking for any special privilege, not asking ranchers to modify anything whatsoever.  No, just asking the state of Utah to mandate labeling so that the consumer can make the choice himself if he's okay with CRISPR genes or not.  It's simple: it's a consent issue.   

Presented a bill with others yesterday @PierreKory @sasha_latypova @KSChevrier sponsored by Utah Senator Trevor Lee to the Utah legislature HB0549 that would require labeling of meat that had received genetic vaccines, so the people of Utah could choose while the risks of…

— Dr. Janci (@JanciToxDoc) February 24, 2024

sponsored by Utah Senator, Trevor Lee, to the Utah legislature HB0549 that would require labeling of meat that had received genetic vaccines, so the people of Utah [can] choose [if they want to take on] the risks of inadvertent secondary transfection using this technology to consumers, meat handlers and the environment are still being investigated.

Paid pharma shills for big AG came out in force and blatantly lied or asserted safety with no proof of such, in defense of not requiring labels. Jennifer Dailey-Provost [Rep.-D] went so far as to assert that we couldn’t be “experts" on the subject because we were not from Utah??? while deferring to FDA experts amongst other idiocy that had no basis in science! I hear she is a physician. It was an embarrassing show of paid influence with not one “against” referring to human health risk or risk to the environment, but only the money it would cost and ‘meat hesitancy’— if you can believe it and the hurdles this would require.

This bill was about requiring LABELS!!! People have the right to know whether they are working with or ingesting secondarily genetic vaccines which may still have transfection potential—-i.e., may cause the consumer to produce the antigen like spike protein or other viral or bacterial foreign antigen, or are at risk for DNA integration from the agent. The risks range from oncogenic [cancer-causing] risk from insertional mutagenesis to the uncontrolled production of antigens and “off target” proteins from using modMRNA and plasmids and autoimmune effects to neurological consequences and cardiac harm to passing these on to offspring with unknown consequence!

Meat handlers could be exposed to untold amounts of transfective agents and proteins which could pose a health risk.

Bacteria in the soil and animals up the food chain are exposed from fecal material and urine and farm waste.

Farm handlers are exposed through shedding of the gene therapies and direct contact with large amounts of the transfective agents directly.

There are hundreds of these gene therapies that have now been approved for use in the animals we ingest.

This must be investigated!!!

from Frontiers . . . 

CA voters approved & funded measures for new reservoirs in 2014. None have been built. We’ve had two very wet winters in a row.

CA voters approved & funded measures for new reservoirs in 2014.

None have been built. We’ve had two very wet winters in a row.

I don’t expect much of government, but this falls short https://t.co/FHo4WSswEB

— KC-10 Driver ✈️ 👨‍✈️ B-737 Wrangler (@MCCCANM) February 23, 2024

"[T]he processes [for making the mRNA jabs] were not characterized...there was no evidence that they were making that spike protein that they claim they were making, ever. And they have never demonstrated they can make it, actually..."

Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova… pic.twitter.com/ugpVGJhSQm

— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) February 24, 2024

But that's actually number one that the FDA, and every other regulator, has to approve is the manufacturing package.  It's called chemistry manufacturing control.  First, that has to be done.  After that, you can talk about safety and efficacy.  Because if you can't manufacture what you're saying your manufacturing, who cares about safety and efficacy?  We don't know what we're testing.  Yet all the big scientists all the big doctors all they talk about all day is safety and efficacy but nobody looks at the manufacturing.

Not just that you can make what you said you would make but that you can make it consistently when you go and swallow a Panadol what you call over there Tylenol you expect that pen at all to be the same product you swallowed the last time you're not expecting variability of that Panadol or else you wouldn't take it.  You're expecting a drug manufacturer to make the same product the same tablet, right?

Same vial same everything in my newt precise quantities in billions of doses so it needs to be extremely precise extremely consistent well characterized I was giving people the analogy and imagine if you go to the bar and get a beer and then next week you go to the same Pub and it's a thousand percent different beer either you know twice the alcohol or no alcohol or some other compound and flavor.  Well you might be dead of alcohol poisoning or maybe it was just water.

Yeah so it wouldn't be right so manufacturing is the big deal so you could see in that document that the EMA regulators