Stephen Coughlin @ Unrestrained Analytics.
2:25. Once they've eaten the fruit they're not in play. Arguably the main point of penetration for Marxist activities May well be in religious organizations it's in hollowing them out have the inability to fall back on over time.
The people who run Marxism would rather be rulers in hell than subject in heaven that is so important to take in they would rather be in command of a s*** Heap that they own then have the most elegant life not being in charge of it.
3:16. What did Mark say in 1837 I wish to avenge myself against the one who rules above. Thus Heaven I have forfeited I Know It full well. My soul once true to God has chosen for hell this point is like being a self-confessed Satanist Satanism is itself operates on a dialectical formula it's the same formula that Marxism operates on and it's the same formula other things operate on like angles metaphysical worldview.
If someone says that they're a witch you just treat them like the Witch and then you start attaching them thing to them things that which is due and you incorporate it that's your analysis because failing to do so maybe to miss things that come in through that. Once you start incorporating this very close long-term association threat analysis we're not going to incorporate crap. We're going to get into it because the people who are operating against us are informed by it. And if we understand how that might influence it if you're doing real threat analysis, you have to account for it. And that's as far as we will go.
4:41. Critical theory is a Neo Marxist principle that envisions the total dissolution of the existing order through a series of escalating dialectical negations over time. On the street side, it's cancel culture. Critical theory is Marxism. It's not a version of Marxism. It's not a form of Marxism. Intersectionality isn't something Marxism participates in. That's a very platonic statement. It is Marxism.
Intersectionality is a Marxist term that covers for the dialectical attack process. It is a popular branding that provides an academic veneer, allows it to pass itself off as a science and supports pseudo science narratives that conceal hostile intent through the systematic negation of targeted cultural, religious and personal values along critical theory lines of attack. Intersectionality is a mechanism of intentional cultural genocide. With a America as a repressive intolerant regime wherever there is an "other" with a competing value, a negative value, that value will be scored as holding a liberating tolerance that will then be pitted against an American value in a dialectical process of negation. The dialectical process was use "the other" to generate as many liberating values as there are American values to be negated. To identify as an American, racism will negate that. Love America, xenophobia will negate that. Secure the Border, the right to the migrant will negate this. Believe the Constitution as the supreme law of the land fascism will negate this if American institutions of Higher Learning were built by immigrants of European stock White Privilege will negate this. If you are biologically male and call yourself a man genderism will negate that. So you're saying that this is how it works what we are talking about is a liquification of reality every one of these intersectional attacks is an attack on your identity so those things that are under direct attack so that you are not allowed to identify yourself it is a total attack on identity and in theory once every one of these is taken out you are whatever we say you are including if we have to make you say you are that yourself. You have a canceled culture. These are attacks on identity that cause you not to lose your way, but to erase it from your own knowledge. Us drifting is a deliberate attack. Nobody forgot anything. This stuff has been removed from your vocabulary. Now there's another aspect to the opposite. It's just made up. It's just made up. So if they lose, all they lose is a made-up narrative. But every time you lose, you lose something so if they have to make up 50 different things to attack a trait, but they lose 10% each time, they know that they have 10 different intersectional attacks on one target ultimately it'll be a trend down. What they are trying to do right now is replay the Weimar Republic when they thought they were going to take control in Germany and what you see them doing on a slow roll is actually try to make sure of the stakes of the Weimar Republic aren't repeated and using Nazis to kind of bootstraps themselves up by calling them the bad guys the Nazis got the upper hand on them.
I can't tell you how much time we lost going to Capitol Hill saying if we could just get this member of congressman to understand us, we could change. And almost invariably, a couple of years later, they knew what we were saying and they were batting for the other team. You can't go to the second cause if the first cause can explain it. Why did they do that? Well, because they did it. If we could just explain it when they do this, bad things happen, they'll stop. But you haven't exhausted the fact that the reason they did it is because bad things happen. You just can't accept the fact that the person you elected to stop it is okay with that.
The difficult thing we have is that everything is so obscured it's so difficult to figure out the actual cause was and then we get wrapped up in why did they do that? Well, you know, the simple answer is they want to negate everything.
9:08. It's just semantic Marxism. If you control the language, you control the conversation, you'll control the outcome.
Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad, Stephen Coughlin, 2015.
