Showing posts with label Muslim Brotherhood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Muslim Brotherhood. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 9, 2025

J. MICHAEL WALLER: Muslim Brotherhood or Hamas they can't fight their wars back home because they're hopelessly outnumbered, so they have to fight them here because the United States exercises so much strength and power abroad so they can subvert the United States from within on a short-term political basis

Host is Lee Smith.

3:30.  Why is the Muslim Brotherhood a threat to American National Security? 

3:36.  It's a profound threat to our national security not so much because it has elements of terrorist networks within it and it supports terrorism.  But an even deeper threat is it's colonizing us.  It's waging a civilizational jihad against us to build population centers, to silence critics, to make themselves indispensable parts of political coalition and to take political power.  So they're looking at playing a very long game in our country, and it's not to come here to become Americans and to assimilate.  It's to impose what they feel like they're morally bound to do, and that is to impose Islamic law over the US Constitution.

4:22.  I knew that a lot of this was happening in Europe.  I mean we see the effects of it throughout the streets of London, Paris, certainly Brussels, but I didn't know it had gotten that bad already in the United States.

4:35.  It's getting there. Europe is already 20 years ahead of us, a generation or two ahead of us.  And it has been going on really since the early mass movements, like the Communist movements, the, you know, the anarchist movements.  They sort of spawn in Europe and then they come over here.  But they're very well embedded in many communities where you can see in places like Minneapolis, or now you've seen in the election of this Mayor [Mamdani] of New York.  They have colonies down in Texas, really in pockets all around the country, large and small, and they're in some of the . . . most of the immigrants are harmless, but if they go to a mosque, that's a Muslim Brotherhood mosque. They're going to get gradually radicalized very softly, almost imperceptibly, not to come out and endorse terrorism or push people out into the streets to support Hamas which some of them do.  But the really long-term civilizational Jihad mosques, run by the Muslim Brotherhood, will just sort of gradually assimilate people, raise their children this way by going to their religious schools, and create a civilization within a civilization that will never assimilate with us.

5:54.  Why do they care about us?  I mean one of the great Muslim Brotherhood ideologues and this was the organization that was founded in Egypt but the Egyptian ideologue site could tub famously came to the United States I can remember.  It was the 40s or the 1950s but he was grossed out just looking at a community church dance and these were you know we're very modest people in a modest dance but he took it as a sign of corruption and rot and lust and all these different things. So why wouldn't they just avoid America why did they feel that it's their need now to take over America?

6:32.  Well, that's the place for everybody to come.  If America is the real threat whether it's American culture, as Sayyid Qutb said, or whether it's American support for Israel or American support for other countries that are Muslim majority countries they're just not Muslim Brotherhood countries. We're the greatest power to support everything they hate.  So they have to colonize us.  

6:59.  So the purpose is really to get here and to undermine us and to I mean how do you they expect a transform the entire country or do they expect a transform the country?  Or do they just want to take pieces of the political pie to be able to shape our politics or do they really expect that there are going to be women walking through the streets of American cities wearing hijabs wearing the head covering because Muslim Brotherhood imams demand it?

7:24.  Well it's all of these things and it's many reasons also so you have you have Muslim Brotherhood people like they're fighting their wars back home like the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood or Hamas they can't fight their wars back home because they're hopelessly outnumbered, so they have to fight them here because the United States exercises so much strength and power abroad so they can subvert the United States from within on a short-term political basis to affect the outcomes of wars or the changing of Borders or the migrations of population they'll do it here to pressure presidents to pressure judges to pressure lawmakers to pressure journalists and then to raise new generations of Americans and other foreigners to see the world through their eyes so that's one great important reason for them for they're fighting their Wars back home but they're also fighting as a sort of in a missionary like way to convert people to Islam under Muslim Brotherhood guidelines because they view it as a supernatural mission.  

8:35.  You mean that this is what the religion demands that they go out and convert that they prosthletize and convert and make the world safer for Islam?  

What you were talking about before that they fight us because they're outnumbered and outgunned at home this was kind of Osama bin Laden's Theory right fighting the far enemy because the near enemy for instance Egypt or Saudi Arabia was too difficult and of course Al Qaeda comes out of Muslim Brotherhood ideology doesn't it as this larger thing we know is political Islam was Bin Laden shaped by the Muslim Brotherhood?

9:21.  Yes he was shaped by their theoretical teachings in addition to Saudi wahhabism which is not Muslim Brotherhood but they all have the same end state and this is what matters.  Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood and Isis and the Shiites and Iran all have the same end state which is to make all the world ruled under Islam all of humanity and to kill all the enemies that they can't control, to kill or enslave the enemies that they can't convert so it's a question of how do they get to that point that's where the difference is.

9:58.  What are the different I mean you know you're talking about Europe I mean one of the fascinating things about I think even London and Paris are different right because I think they had different concepts Concepts about how to deal with political Islam my understanding is that the Brits pretty much let it happen they let all and all these fanatical Imams and the idea was well as long as you don't put Terror attacks against us it's okay and I think the French at first were sort of like that and then the French said well wait now they are starting to plot attacks against us we have to round them up and be pretty tough what's the American idea about Muslim Brotherhood influence on our Shores or do we have a coherent plan right now to confront this not only to confront it but hopefully to defeat it and to end it once and for all?

10:45.  We don't have a plan we've been faced with before since 9/11 with this threat with this problem that people didn't want to talk about because they were afraid of being called racist or bigots or whatever other labels were being thrown at them even after 9/11 when we needed the American Muslim Community to help us fight Al Qaeda the Muslim Brotherhood came in not to to be a difficult challenge to us but to "help our authorities."  So they came in by offering translation services by offering their expertise and how to advise the FBI and the CIA the military on how to think about Islam how to understand the communities that either the bureau here at home or the CIA in the military abroad were going to operate in. And you can think, "Well that's all really well and that's really helpful," but really they were teaching our military security and intelligence people how to think about Islam through the Muslim Brotherhood's view of the world.  

11:51.  Yeah it's pretty amazing I mean you see the different the different ways the brother hood is described fighting for social justice is primarily started as an aid organization when nothing of the sort.  I mean it started in Egypt in 1928 and the whole purpose was to be fighting the British occupiers at the time.  And they started turning and fighting the Jews in Israel look, is the 

12:19.  and that's a key right there, Lee.  They were fighting the British first.  They didn't . . . Muslim Brotherhood didn't care about the Jews they cared about secular Muslims.  They cared about different non-Arab Muslims getting . . . pushing them out.  And they cared about the British occupier, so the Israel and the Jews didn't come until later.  This is a big misconception now that somehow if we didn't support Israel we wouldn't have a Muslim Brotherhood problem.

12:45.  Yeah that's a very interesting point because that's how people sort of rationalize Hamas as well they say oh it's about the occupation Israel doing this and doing that.  But if you go back through the history of their Brotherhood you find well I mean how would you I mean certainly we call it an extremist organization but it's also exclusivist if not eliminationist, right anyone who doesn't follow who doesn't follow this are their enemies I want to ask something about the talking about what happened after 9/11.  There's a lot of people I think are still in some shock about the recent election to the mayor of New York Zora Mamdani and a lot of people are saying well the guy is not really in islamist as it turns out he's a crazy socialist like a lot of kids you see in school but then we understand that he's been this is not the case right his parents got money from the Qataris which is kind of home base, Global home base for the Brotherhood and then of course the different organizations he was a a member of like students for justice in Palestine and the whole chant of globalizing the Intifada.  So should people be worried about Mamdani as a Muslim Brotherhood activist, as the Mayor of New York?

14:02.  Sure.  That's why he was deployed he had a whole image making campaign and champions throughout New York and really throughout the country and the world to promote him not because he was such a great capable Visionary guy but because he represented a much larger movement so when he was elected you had both the Muslim Brotherhood celebrating his election but you also have the Democratic socialists of America celebrating his election saying that this is the greatest single revolutionary victory in a century that's their shorthand for the greatest victory since the Bolshevik Revolution they see now one of America's greatest cities under control of the red-green axis.

14:49.  What does this tell us about our ability to our own resistance our own antibodies against this because you know again you're talking about 9/11 and I was visiting New York recently my hometown and I was reminded not only of the First World Trade Center bombing in 1993 but also 1994 there was a crazed islamist a guy from Lebanon got up on the FDR Drive or actually on the access point of the Brooklyn Bridge and he shot at a bus full of Chabad kids and one of them was killed and that driveway is named after him so this has been going on even before 9/11 so again what does it tell us about Americans ability to not only understand what's happening but to fight it? 

15:37.   We willfully don't understand as a country.  We like to think the best of people.  There's a tendency for many Americans to feel guilty, you know, about being an Anglo-Saxon; you know, having Anglo-Saxon roots in our country somehow that's wrong, somehow it's oppressive, and somehow we have to compensate.  And one of the ways of compensation is to accept as many people from around the world as possible and then not demanding they assimilate, and, in fact, accommodating all of their demands.  And then you have others who simply want to be left alone, or they even want to speak out but they're so harassed when they speak out that they just shut up, and . . . that's probably a majority of the country.  They know something is wrong but . . . they can't say anything, and then you have others who find themselves their lives professionally ruined.  You saw this after 9/11 when the Bush Administration took rapid action to go after it Al Qaeda and reached out to the American Muslim Community.  But what?  There is no community in America Islam.  There weren't many Shiite Muslims here and those who were here were refugees from the Ayatollahs for the most part. The Sunni Islam isn't a vertically structured entity. So it does not have a "community," because it's all horizontal.  It's all, it's more like more Grassroots ish not top down but what is top down claiming to represent everybody the Muslim Brotherhood

Tuesday, November 18, 2025

J. MICHAEL WALLER: Huge development: The Muslim Brotherhood and @CAIRNational are now officially designated terrorist and criminal organizations in the state of Texas.

CAIRNational.  

Monday, October 20, 2025

Germany Cancels Christmas--Safety Costs too High for Comfort

The vast majority of Christmas markets are going to be canceled in Germany due to "security costs that are too high".

The police and authorities are incapable of preventing terrorist attacks. They are "overwhelmed." --Wall Street Mav

"People of the book" is an Islamic term Muslims use to refer to Jews, Christians and Sabians, and is sometimes applied to members of other religions such as Zoroastrians.  "People of the Book" refers to a term in Islam that designates Jews and Christians, as they are believed to have received divine revelations through holy scriptures. It highlights the shared religious heritage and values among these Abrahamic faiths.

"dhimmi populations"?

from Watchers.ie,

Germany Cancels Christmas — Safety Costs Too High for Comfort Once upon a time, Germany’s Christmas markets were the heart of the season — mulled wine, roasted almonds, laughter, and a sense of peace. Now, they’re becoming a luxury item in the age of “diversity.” According to officials, the reason isn’t lack of interest or bad weather — it’s security costs. Yes, you read that right. The country that once built cathedrals and Christmas traditions for the world now can’t afford to protect its own markets from the “new realities” of modern Europe. After the terror attacks in Berlin and Magdeburg, regulations tightened. Concrete barriers, surveillance systems, and private security have driven expenses into the millions. For many organizers — especially private ones — the burden is simply too high. Some are shutting down altogether. So, here we are: centuries-old traditions — gone, or behind metal fences — while the same political class that created this mess lectures the public on “tolerance.” The Christmas market, once a symbol of community and joy, has become a crime scene waiting to happen — not because Germans changed, but because their leaders did. Germany isn’t losing Christmas because of inflation. It’s losing it because of cowardice — and because defending your own culture has somehow become controversial.

"From Gluhwein and Gingerbread to Barricades and Budget Woes--How Terror Fears Are Dimming [and dhimmi] the Magic of Weihnachtsmarkte," Blanca Firenze, J & M Duna Press, October 14, 2025.


Tuesday, October 24, 2023

in 2006, [Israel] did something even more unbelievable: they helped turn Hamas into a political movement, not just a terrorist movement but to mainstream them, to legitimize them, to make them a movement capable of governing Gaza.

Thank you to Mike Rivero @ What Really Happened.  

We are responsible for Hamas.  Yes, it's something that sprung up from the tragedy of the Palestinian people. When I was in the Negev at the kibbutz, we were talking about how this happened.  In 1946, there were only 500 Jews in the Negev Desert, 500.  In October of 1946, They carried out what was called the 11 Points Operation, where teams of Israeli soldiers would seize a hilltop, take control of it, then bring in pre-fabricated buildings to create this kibbutz and they'd be right next to these Arab villages.  In many of these places, overnight an Israeli settlement shows up and they'd bring in people and they're just quadrupling, tripling the Jewish population in the negative, but they were next to these Arab villages.  These Arab villages on this one hillside, the Israelis that took it over didn't have any water.  So they are there on top of the hill, they got no water, the Arabs brought water to them, and said, "Here.  Here's water. Welcome, our neighbors."  Some of them weren't happy about this, but we recognized the inevitability of this.  We welcome you.  And then as 1946 turned into 1948, it became inevitable that Israel was going to take the negative.  And so these Arabs all went to their Israeli Neighbors and said, "Hey, we're living in peace, so when this happens, please, let us stay here in our homes."  And the Israelis are all like, "Yeah, yeah yeah." Then, boom! And they wiped them all out, wiped them all out.  They went into the villages of the villagers who gave them water and they killed the men.  They drove the men into a ravine and shot them.  They went house by house by house shooting the men in there.  If this sounds a lot like what happened on Saturday, it is exactly what happened on Saturday.  But this time, it's Israelis kicking down the door, shooting the men, evicting hundreds of thousands of these people in what they call the nakba, "the catastrophe."  They put the women and children and the surviving men on trucks and shipped them to Gaza.  And then around Gaza, they built a series of kibbutzes to hold them in, to keep them prisoner there. So they created this open air concentration camp.  And the kibbutzes are there to keep the Arabs in.  That's it.  That's what happened. 

Now they had a problem here. . . .  If you study Israeli history, and I have, like I said I lived there, I worked with them, and my host was historically minded.  There's a speech.  In America, we have "The Gettysburg Address," Abraham Lincoln's great address given in Gettysburg after the battle and signing one of the great statements of who we are as a people.  The Israelis have a similar speech, but it's a eulogy read by Moshi Dayan in 1956 for a guy named Roy Rutenberg. Roy Rutenberg was a soldier of the kibbutz.  He was in one of the kibbutzes that's now at the frontline of where some horrible things happened on Saturday and Sunday.  But he was ambushed by Arabs from Gaza and killed, and there was a lot of anger, and so Moshi Dayan came and gave a speech.  And in the speech he says, "Don't blame the Gazans because we live here on the land that we stole from their families.  We live on this land, and they stare at us with eyes of hatred, and we ignore them and we pretend they don't exist, we treat them as animals so don't blame them for coming at us because this is what we did."  And then he goes on to say, ". . . but what we did, we had to do, we had to do, and we must keep the sword in our hand to keep these people away.  That's the reality.  Israel created the problem of Gaza, created the problem of the Palestinian of the West Bank.  Then what happens in the 1980s, when Yasser Arafat's Fatah movement, PLO, become very powerful and influential, the Israelis say, "How do we break them up within Gaza?" because it's very close to Egypt.  And Egypt had a movement called the Muslim Brotherhood, a very radical, violence oriented group.  And the Egyptians suppressed them, killed a lot of guys, arrested a lot of guys.  The #2 man, al-Zawahiri and Al Qaeda was a Muslim Brotherhood dude from Egypt.  But many of the Muslim Brotherhood gravitated to Gaza where they were hiding out from the Egyptians.  What the Israelis did is said, "hey why don't we empower the Muslim Brotherhood."  Why don't we help turn them into a movement that can offset Yasser Arafat's PLO?  So in the 1980s, Israel made Hamas.  Israel made Hamas. Now you already have the elements there but Israel breathed life into them.  Israel created Hamas.  In 2006, Israel helped Hamas move from being a terrorist organization that was blowing up buses when I was in Israel.  Israel made the organization that blew up a restaurant that I used to eat at when I was in Israel.  Israel made this organization and now they're at war with this organization.  And then in 2006, they did something even more unbelievable: they helped turn Hamas into a political movement, not just a terrorist movement but to mainstream them, to legitimize them, to make them a movement capable of governing Gaza.  Because the purpose was to strip Gaza away from the West Bank, from Fatah, from the PLO and they succeeded.  And now we ask what happened in this most recent go-round.  Israel has been struggling to deal with Hamas ever since.  And the current feeling is that they have succeeded in creating the conditions where Hamas will stop being a terrorist organization, whose charter by the way used to read "the destruction of Israel was their mission."  They've modified it with words that some people say, "Oh see, they're not calling for the destruction of Israel."  They really are.  They just changed the words.  That happened in 2006.  So the settlements could be withdrawn in 2005 to become a purely Palestinian land, but it's a concentration camp run by the Israelis, everything is run by the Israelis.  But they make Hamas>  Now what they said this time around was we, . . . because everybody's calling this an intelligence failure.  This is the biggest intelligence failure ever; well, it is but it's also a byproduct of something that's been biting the Israelis in the butt for decades, called the "Conception