First question, if the vaccines are safe and effective for
children, why do the vaccine manufacturers come begging to the government for
liability protection? I mean if they're safe and effective . . . ?
Thank you, Ronald Reagan?
H.R.5546 - National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. Sweet sounding
title for an Act of Congress. It almost sounds like the government has
come to the aid and rescue of injuries to children and parents, but you'd be
wrong, dead wrong. So wrong, in fact, that you'd fail to grasp the
criminal monopoly that Reagan handed over to the drug cartel operating openly
with complete immunity inside the United States. Hell, inside the hallowed
halls of medical centers or complexes named after catholic saints or Christian
denominations. Talk about putting the stamp of approval on medical
atrocities . . . .
The summary of the act doesn't read like it's protecting anyone
except for the vaccine manufacturers. In Article I, you read no reference
to vaccine injury at all. Instead, it reads like a government mandate
with directorial commands like "direct,"
"ensure," and "coordinate." This is a mandate, not
protection.
(Measure
passed House, amended) National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986
- Title I: Vaccines - Subtitle 1: National Vaccine Program -
Amends the Public Health Service Act to establish in the Department of Health
and Human Services a National Vaccine Program to: (1) direct vaccine research
and development within the Federal Government; (2) ensure the production and
procurement of safe and effective vaccines; (3) direct the distribution and use
of vaccines; and (4) coordinate governmental and nongovernmental activities.
Requires the Director of the Program to report to specified congressional
committees.
Establishes
the National Vaccine Advisory Committee to recommend: (1) ways to encourage the
availability of an adequate supply of vaccines; and (2) research
priorities.
So that we're clear, this law protects vaccine manufacturers of
childhood vaccines, not adult vaccines. Vax manufacturers of adult
vaccines can be sued. But why would the government, to whim we pay taxes,
sign a law into effect and provide funding for it on our dime that protects
manufacturers from liability?
Jon Rappoport explains that
The
original 1986 law removed all liability from vaccine makers BECAUSE THERE WAS A
PROBLEM, AND THAT PROBLEM WAS VACCINE SAFETY.
How did the American people ever come to think of the federal
government protecting the American people from criminal gangs operating freely
and openly in the U.S.
So, did Congress recognize there was a serious vaccine safety
problem? You bet your life they did, and to make it seem they cared, they
charged HHS with doing something about it, and reporting to them (Congress)
every two years.
WHICH NEVER HAPPENED
And thanks to the efforts of Kennedy and Bigtree,
all this is now exposed.
You can read the court judgment and relevant
press release in this pdf document, here.
Again…
In 1986, vaccine makers went to the federal
government and said they were going to get out of the vaccine business, because
juries were awarding too much money in court, to parents of vaccine-injured
children. The feds basically said, “We’ll ram through a law eliminating those
lawsuits,” and they did. EVERYBODY AND HIS BROTHER KNEW VACCINE SAFETY WAS A
MAJOR PROBLEM…
It's one thing for the government to shield
selected manufacturers from legal and monetary damages. That's bad
enough. But equally galling is the fact that doctors, those folks who
recommend or dissuade vaccines as therapy to their patients, are also exempt
from prosecutions. Which means they can be loosey goosey with medical
advice because there us no price to pay for being wrong.
