Showing posts with label 2024. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2024. Show all posts

Thursday, June 27, 2024

ALEX CLARK: Whole Foods and Sprouts are upcharging customers under the impression they’re getting grassfed organic chicken and beef and selling meat from Tyson and Cargill, not to mention still serving a seed oil-infested hot bar.

What’s the solution? Know your local regenerative and organic farmers. Ask them hard questions. Build a relationship. Collapse Big Food. --Alex Clark
Whole Foods and Sprouts are upcharging customers under the impression they’re getting grassfed organic chicken and beef. The curtain has been pulled back and they’re selling meat from Tyson and Cargill, not to mention still serving a seed oil-infested hot bar. Food & Wine (2017): According to a Bloomberg report, a growing percentage of Whole Foods' poultry and beef is now sourced from mega-sized producers, including Perdue and Tyson-owned brands. One way this occurs is that after the products are delivered to Whole Foods for final processing, the company packages the chicken under the 365 Everyday Value label and sells it in its stores, despite being available for a lower cost at other supermarkets. Additionally, while Whole Foods only sells meat that is certified as Step 1 or higher by the Global Animal Partnership (GAP), the company sources some of its beef from Meyer Natural Angus, which processes its meat in a Cargill facility in Colorado that also processes GAP-uncertified cattle simultaneously, albeit separately. Pictured today: screenshots between Jamieanneaesthetics and Sprouts, with them admitting their chicken is just Tyson. What’s the solution? Know your local regenerative and organic farmers. Ask them hard questions. Build a relationship. Collapse Big Food.

Why should a health conscious customer base continue shopping with these companies if they’re just becoming expensive Walmart? 

AARON SIRI: [Peter Marks] sat, as I would expect, as a partner with Pfizer, defending them from their misconduct. He should have been outraged. He should have said, "Why didn't you report this?" irrespective of why you thought this was related. You had an obligation to tell us of all injuries"

Though Dr. Peter Marks concedes that the COVID-19 vaccine causes a 5-fold increase of myocarditis in children, he still pushes the vaccines.

PETER ST ONGE: [2nd mortgages] effectively turns a house into a credit card; in fact, one that is government-subsidized by Freddie Mac

New home sales are tumbling yet home prices just hit a fresh all-time record, pretty much on brand for this miracle economy of ours where nothing is selling but it's all really expensive.  The numbers come from the National Association of Realtors who report that the median existing home price in May was a record $419,000, up nearly 6% from last year.  Meanwhile, sales of existing homes plunged to just 4.1 million; that's down 6% on the quarter and down 40% since Joe Biden took office.  What's crashing the number of sales, of course, is interest rates, which at 7.5% are putting houses out of reach you need to make six figures to qualify for a starter home and your mortgage will be half your income.  What makes this interesting is that crashing sales were supposed to bring prices back to earth after the pandemic bubble.  They have not for the simple reason that rates went up so fast that it's locked people in.  They can't afford a replacement house; after all, maybe your condo went up 40%, but that starter house also went up 40%.  So even with the gains you cannot afford to upgrade at 7.5% mortgage unless you are retiring and moving to Costa Rica.  So I mentioned recent videos, this is all done a number on the young and working class.  It means pretty much the only buyers are people who need to: they got a job at a new city, or maybe they lost their job and are moving down to renting.  For everybody else, young families, empty nesters, they are locked in. 

1:33. Meanwhile, of course, inflation keeps marching up driving up house prices.  It's a roughly centuries-long trend that houses move up almost in lockstep with inflation.  That means for all those people waiting for the pandemic housing bubble to burst, it may never burst.  Inflation will just push the prices up to meet it.  In fact, house prices could take another jump, because ZeroHedge reports that government-owned mortgage bundler Freddie Mac, which already owes roughly three trillion dollars worth of mortgages, just applied to deal in second mortgages.  Now, a second mortgage is when you take a fresh loan out to take money out of your house.  The problem is that this effectively turns a house into a credit card; in fact, one that is government-subsidized by Freddie Mac.  That does two things: that drives house prices even higher because a credit card is worth more than frozen equity; worse, it encourages people to drain every last dime out of their house.  That leaves them right on the edge of default when a recession or just a layoff does hit them.  We saw that in 2008 when millions of owners bailed on their houses because they owed more than it was worth.  With subsidized second mortgages, if you are smart you should owe more than your house is worth; it's a cheap loan.  

2:47. For 50 years, Washington has done everything possible to pump up house prices as a kind of upper-middle-class welfare scheme that buys votes, pays the affluent, but fleeces the have-nots.  Now we've got a world of rich boomers stepping over the young, who are not only giving up on starting a family, they're losing faith in the entire system, doom spending their way to oblivion.  In terms of what is next, if you own a house here comes another jackpot; if not, it is time to start driving for Uber.  

Read the whole article with charts and all the gory details at profstonge.com

Wednesday, June 26, 2024

πŸš¨πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί U.S. bombs killing civilians on a beach in Sevastopol, Russia

Jesse Gelsinger Case, 1999 

17-year-old Jesse Gelsinger suffered from the genetic metabolic disease called orinthe transcarbamylase OTC deficiency this prevents the body from breaking down ammonia a metabolic waste product unless a person's diet is immediately adjusted and monitored throughout their life they will die soon after birth.

Although gel singer had controlled his OTC well he volunteered for a genetic therapy experiment in hopes of helping infants with a more severe form of the metabolic disorder he had a negative reaction to the treatment caused by severe immune response to the virus Vector used to deliver the corrective gene and died.

Three ethical issues with regard to gene therapy emerge from the Gelsinger case one should a relatively healthy adult volunteer with OTC have been used as a volunteer rather than newborns that were very sick too Gelsinger was told that the treatment was relatively safe however it emerged that past research subjects and experimental animals had become sick from the treatment was there adequate informed consent with regard to the risks three the lead doctor and institution had financial interest in the development of the treatment that was used if it had been successful they would have been well positioned to make a lot of money should researchers and research Institutes have a stake in clinical trials?

Wikipedia provides context on Jesse Gelsinger, 

Jesse Gelsinger (June 18, 1981 – September 17, 1999) was the first person publicly identified as having died in a clinical trial for gene therapy. Gelsinger suffered from ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency, an X-linked genetic disease of the liver, the symptoms of which include an inability to metabolize ammonia – a byproduct of protein breakdown. The disease is usually fatal at birth, but Gelsinger had a milder form of the disease, in which the ornithine transcarbamylase gene is mutated in only part of the patient's cells, a condition known as somatic mosaicism. As his deficiency was partial, Gelsinger managed to survive on a restricted diet and special medications.

AARON SIRI: "Everybody here is saying they're safe...Then there should be no reason to continue giving those companies the immunity to liability for injuries if they are safe, as has been advocated . . ."

Tuesday, June 25, 2024

REPORT: Julian Assange spent $500k for his flight out of the UK to avoid landing on the American homeland after he was released from prison.

REPORT: Julian Assange spent $500k for his flight out of the UK to avoid landing on the American homeland after he was released from prison. Assange will instead be landing on a remote U.S. island where he will plead guilty to the charges. The island is the U.S. territory of Saipan in the Northern Mariana Islands, about 1,800 miles from Australia. “He has to front up to charges that have been brought under U.S. law," said a professor at the University of Sydney's law school. Assange will have the U.S. federal court hearing on Wednesday morning on the remote island. His wife suggested the $500k flight was paid for in debt so they will likely launch a fundraising campaign to pay it off.  

Assange is headed for Australia where he will reunite with his family. 

PETER ST ONGE: one study by Cambridge University found that regulations have added between $6,000 and $7,000 to the cost of a car and have wiped out cheaper models altogether.

A speeding freight train of regulations is coming that will gut small businesses while climate mandates make pretty much everything that plugs in suck.  A new study by the Job Creators Network estimates that 1.2 trillion dollars in new regulations are about to hit Americans courtesy of Joe Biden; that would be on top of the estimated 1.9 trillion dollars we already lose to regulations.  Per household, that comes to $10,000 in new regulations on top of the $15,000 in regulations we already pay every year.  Put differently, 20 cents on the dollar you earn got snagged by regulatory costs; you never saw it.  Taxes are on top of that.  The new rules run the gamut from emissions to staffing and diversity to reporting requirements for global warming.  There are manufacturing restrictions on pretty much everything in your house.  So dishwashers, water heaters, ceiling fans, light bulbs, gas stoves, washing machines, and, of course, air conditioners.  One study by the Alliance for Consumers estimates the new rules will increase the cost of a washing machine by $200, a furnace by $500, and the cost of refilling your air conditioner by over $1,000; they could push some products, like gas stoves, out of existence altogether.  Now all of that is on top of existing regulations that already pushed all these things up by thousands.  For example, one study by Cambridge University found that regulations have added between $6,000 and $7,000 to the cost of a car and have wiped out cheaper models altogether.  Of course, none of that is a problem for the 1%.  They will still drive Bentleys and crank the heat up in winter, and it's a positive bonanza for the huge companies whose donations bought all of those lovely regulations.  As for the rest of us, wear another sweater and take the bus.  Beyond the crap products, this flood of regulations is driving tens of thousands of factories and businesses overseas.  To illustrate, the National Association of Manufacturers estimates that it currently costs $30,000 in Regulatory Compliance alone for every manufacturing worker.  For small manufacturers, the mom-and-pop, that actually comes to $50,000 in regulatory costs.  They can't spread it out over as many workers, so that is literally more than the salary and that goes to Regulatory Compliance alone.  Upcoming rules are targeting precisely these small businesses, most notoriously on climate disclosure, climate change procurement, basically locking small companies out of selling to the federal government, and a  "transparency rule on climate that would hit 11 million small firms with nearly 100 billion dollars in fresh costs."  Many of course will just give up and close shop.  The rules are part of 5,300 rules imposed since Obama.  Trump had briefly reversed the tide.  Remember he took out two regulations for every new one but Joe Biden's handlers have doubled down even out doing the famously destructive Obama in terms of job-crushing regulations that make everything you buy suck.  There is a rate of hope in an upcoming Supreme Court decision, called Loper V Raimondo, brought by a fishing boat that was forced to pay $700 a day for regulator ride-alongs.  If the decision comes in favor of the Fishers, it could dramatically rein in the federal rule Leviathan, obliging major rules to actually go through Congress instead of auto-spawning in the Deep State.  If not, the regulatory strangle will continue trillion by trillion until your jobs in China you furnished are just for show and you need a mortgage to buy a car made of tin cans.

TEXAS: Thanks to the retail pharmacy lobby, Texas is one of 5 states that doesn’t allow MDs to dispense medications.

Talk about your lone star.  

I could not imagine practicing medicine in 2024.

"You're getting very loud with me, and you're a professional just like I am."  Who is loud?  A bit presumptuous, eh, lady?  Bowden was recommending some workarounds, and the pharmacist gets offended, loud, and defensive?  She relies on the mutual standing of professionalism like it's the perfect excuse to not solve the problem.  Does "professionalism" really mean "representin'"?  O, Incompetence! 

DR. JANE RUBY: The same satanic scumbags that want to ensure full-term abortions are also trying to get 4 shots called vaccines into fetus prior to birth!

Just out of principle, everyone should absolutely reject any opinion, any procedure, any diagnosis from anyone working inside the medical complex.   It used to be that pediatricians would recommend Hepatitis B shots for kids on their 2nd day of life.  Now, they're recommending vaccines for pregnant mothers, so that the kids are injected with poisons before they're even born.  Dear God.

MR. AMERICA FIRST, DONALD TRUMP: I think you should get automatically as part of your diploma, a green card to be able to stay in this country

Iceland has a Venezuelan migrant problem.  How did the Venezuelan migrants get across the ocean?  Well, of course, the Soros organizations will bring people across the oceans, no problem at all.  They've had an explosion of Venezuelans in Iceland, and they thought this is just wonderful, we're going to have diversity and all the rest of the stuff and then they see what is happening with all these young males that are being brought in.  What's the point?  What exactly is the point of bringing all these young Latin males from one culture and transplanting them into another, completely different Nordic culture?  What's the point of it?

Well, Iceland officials are pulling back their former support.  They say they've deported 180 migrants who had only recently arrived in Iceland.  The deportation bill was wildly popular even among the left Green Party, even the Greens were for this.  Among its internal Provisions they allowed Iceland to ignore the UN and its open border-styled immigration policy demands the legislation reportedly sets stricter conditions for residency, for family migration, and for other measures.  With the mood shifting against Venezuelans they've deported 180 recent Venezuelan migrants all at once.  No Iceland is very small compared to the United States in 2018 they had 14 Venezuelan immigrants within 4 years that had exploded to 1200 about 100 times it exploded and that was all coming from the UN.

Now they are in direct contradiction to a couple of UN Conventions that they had signed up for.  They had signed up for the UN Convention for Human Rights that doesn't allow them to deport anybody.  And the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.  That is the instrument to destroy parental rights, UN Convention in the Rights if the Child, every country has signed into that except the United States.  In the United States, it is not being done through treaty, it is being done through our courts, who have been destroying parental rights.  The good news is if there is a will to do something about it just like they're saying Iceland they realize what a problem this is.  They're saying, well I don't care if we're signed on to the UN Convention of Human Rights.  I don't care that we're signed on to the UN Convention of the Rights of the Child, and they just threw it out.  The only party that supports keeping the Venezuelans there, the only one, the Green Party, all the lefties except for the Pirate Party, and they opposed the bill.  But the other major Icelandic parties, including the Independence Party, the Progressive Party, the Left Greens, they all voted in favor of tightening the country's immigration policies, and they voted to kick them out.  

Now, contrast that with Donald Trump, for example. Donald Trump was going to stop immigration.  He was going to build a border.  He did none of that.  As a matter of fact, we got caravans as soon as they realized that Donald Trump was all talk and no action.  He didn't deport anybody he allowed Obama's executive order saying they were going to defer action, saying that we were going to defer action of the law and . . . .  Here's an executive order saying that my department of justice is not going to enforce the law.  How does that pass muster with the courts?  How does that pass muster with anybody?  Instead, Trump pretended that he couldn't create an executive order that countermanded Obama's executive order.  "Well, I really would like to do what I promised but I have to ask the courts for permission," and so he did it in this long drawn-out thing.  And the courts said, "No, you can't overturn Obama's executive order."  That can't possibly be true, and we all know that.  But as Trump was talking to CEOs he made an amazing revelation that came out over the weekend.  The CEO appeals,

We need to recruit the best and brightest of the world every time we get somebody super intelligent from India or Europe any country, and three of the four here are immigrants, into our country the ones without the toys and we can get these great people into our country and that's a loss for our adversaries and our competitors and it's a gain for us.  But I've never heard you talk about this. Can you please promise us you will give us more ability to import the best and brightest around the world to America? 

Trump answers,

I do promise, but I happen to agree, that's why I promise; otherwise, I wouldn't promise.  Let me just tell you that it's so sad that we lose people from Harvard, MIT, from the greatest schools, and the lesser schools that are phenomenal school also.  And what I wanted to do and I would have done this, but we had to solve the COVID problem because that dominated for a little while as you perhaps know.  But what I want to do and what I will do is if/when you graduate from a college, I think you should, I think you should get automatically as part of your diploma, a green card to be able to stay in this country.  If you graduate or get a doctorate degree from college you should be able to stay in this country.  And you know more stories than I do, but I know stories where people graduated from a top college or from a college and they desperately wanted to stay here, they had a plan for a company, a concept, and they can't.  They go back to India, go back to China.  They become multi-millionaires and employ thousands and thousands of people, and it could have been done here.  And a bigger example is you need a pool of people to work for your company.  You have great companies, and they have to be smart people.  Not everybody can be less than smart; you need brilliant people. 

6:32. All these people who have immigrated here, like Elon Musk and Vivek "the snake" Wami Swami, yeah, we don't want Americans here.  We want to be able to bring in other people in cuz Americans are crap, right?  I don't know how we ever got a country like this.  What happened?  How did it get here? You know, Americans can't do anything; we need foreigners to come in and fix everything.  You understand, don't you, that Trump was lying to you the whole time?  You understand that he never had any intention of doing anything about open immigration, and he doesn't either.  The idea from him that people are coming here and they're getting scholarships getting free rides . . . .

Monday, June 24, 2024

DR. PAUL MARIK: Only “about 5% of all cancers that are actually curable with chemotherapy.”

Dr. Paul Marik Exposes the Truth About Cancer Only “about 5% of all cancers that are actually curable with chemotherapy.” For the remaining 95%, “Chemotherapy is palliative at best” and comes with several nasty side effects: • Nausea and vomiting • Hair loss • Anemia • Infections • Bruising and bleeding • Skin and nail changes • Cognitive changes • Sexual and reproductive issues • Peripheral neuropathy • Edema • “Knocks out the bone marrow” • Et cetera So, are conventional cancer treatments working? Despite advancements in chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgical treatments over the past 30 years, the overall life expectancy of a cancer patient has been extended by a measly 3.9 months.

As such, Dr. Marik advised cancer patients to ask this question: “Is this [chemotherapy] going to cure my cancer, or is it just going to palliate and extend my life a month or two with terrible side effects?” 

MAKING SENSE OF THE WAR ON TERROR: Christopher Bollyn's longest and most detailed presentation on who perpetrated 9/11 & the subsequent 'War on Terror'

When you consider the events of last Sunday, October 1, 2017, the Las Vegas mass shooting at the , you'll see that we are fully immersed in a historical period of gross deception and evil terrorism.  The shooting in Las Vegas was the second worst of all of these mass shootings, the first worst in the United States; the only one that was worse was the one in Norway, where Andres Brevic supposedly killed 69 people.  /but of these mass shootings, 4 of the 5 worst mass shootings have occurred in the last 10 years.  And I think all of them except for the 1966 University of Texas Tower Shooting have occurred since 9/11.  So this is all part of this artificial reality that we're living in.  So the reason I call it "Solving 9/11 Ends the War" is because the solution to the War on Terror is 9/11 Truth.  When you understand the truth about 9/11, you'll understand the fraudulence of the War on Terror because they are two sides of the same coin, a counterfeit coin, a fraudulent coin.

2:39  See Bollyn's credentials/resume.  Solving 9/11: The Deception that Changed the World, 2012, set of books.  I saw 9/11 as a crime, as a crime that needs to be solved, investigated it, looked at the people involved in the crime, and why it was done.  Solving 9/11: The Original Articles, 2012.  The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East, 2017.  The real strategy behind the War on Terror, a war of conquest and aggression in the Middle East being waged under the pretext of fighting terrorism.  Fighting terrorism is just a pretext.  For example, we're fighting ISIS today and we're also fighting in Niger in central Africa.  Behind the War on Terror is a strategic plan to redraw the map of the Middle East.  Clue #1: it's not an American plan.  There's a common origin behind the War on Terror and the 9/11 plots . . . is that they were conceived by Israeli military intelligence in the 1970s under the leadership of Menachem Begin, who was the notorious terrorist leader of the Irgun in Palestine and Israel in the 1940s.

5:12  So 9/11 was a false flag terror atrocity designed to create fear and rage to get U.S. public opinion to support the War on Terror, a pre-planned Zionist war agenda to be waged under the pretext of fighting terrorism.  Starting the War on Terror was the primary reason for the false flag terror attack on 9/11.  It was a construct and the final piece was 9/11, like a keystone they dropped in place that held up the whole structure.  9/11 was a policy coup that brought us the War on Terror and a series of costly wars, like the one in Iraq.  

6:01  Wesley Clark, 4-star General, U.S., Army, the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe during the Balkans, the War in Yugoslavia.  And he said in San Francisco in 2007, he said, 

whether you're a Democrat or a Republican, if you're an American you ought to be concerned about the strategy of the United States in this region, the Middle East.  What is our aim?  What is our purpose?  Why are we there?  Why are Americans dying in this region?  That is the issue. 

So why did 3 Americans die in Niger the other day?  Most Americans didn't even know that we were in Niger.  He went on to say that,

What happened on 9/11 is that we didn't have a strategy, we didn't have bipartisan agreement, we didn't have American understanding of it, and we had instead a policy coup in this country--a coup--a policy coup.  
Some hard-nosed people took over the direction of American policy, and they never bothered to inform the rest of us.  October 3, 2007 

This coup that he's talking about is really like a policy hijacking. Our nation's military policy in the Middle East was hijacked.  This guy's a high level guy at the Pentagon, the Supreme Allied Commander of Europe in the 1990s, and for him it just dropped out of the blue.  He didn't know where this came from.  But he says about 9/11, he said something very interesting, he says, "we didn't have a an American understanding of it.". The military understanding that we had of 9/11 was not American.  What was it?  It was foreign, obviously, he means it was from France or Germany or England?  No, it was from Israel.

7:35. Our understanding of 9/11 came to us the interpretation of the 9/11 attacks came to us from Israel here's a photograph from the Pentagon the men that are talking at this table comprise the defense policy board and you have Paul Wolfowitz there on the Deputy Secretary of Defense, the Comptroller of the Pentagon, sitting across there in the way with his glasses smiling, and sitting next to the Israeli Chief of Staff you have Douglas Fife, whose father was in the Irgun.  So these three men, these three men at the Pentagon, they were the Defense Policy Board, the three leading members.  The Defense Policy Board is the group, the people, the Zionist NeoCons who made the policy the United States put in to effect in the Middle East after 9/11.  Defense Policy Board.. it's not that Donald Rumsfeld decides what to do.  He was a Secretary of Defense.  This Defense Policy Board does that.  Here they are, as I said, meeting with the highest level Israeli military commander, the Chief of Staff January 18, 2002.  What was the policy that was being put into effect?  Again as Wesley Clark said in March of 2007, he said, 

About 10 days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. 
One of the generals called me in.  He said, "We made the decision: we're going to war with Iraq." 

We are going to war with Iraq?  I said, Why? 

"I don't know," he said. 
I came back a few weeks later, and by this time we were bombing Afghanistan.  I said are we still going to war with Iraq?  
He said, "Sir, it's worse than that. We are going to take out 7 countries in 5 years, starting with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off with Iran." 

As you can see from that shopping list, that agenda, 5 of those countries have been done since 9/11.  Lebanon has always been in a mess, and Iran is the only country that we haven't done yet.  So the policy that he heard about, this memo that he heard about, seems to be a pretty close prognosis to what we're doing today.  

9:44.  So where did this policy come from?  Whose agenda is this?  If it's not an American agenda, who's agenda is it?  Well, it's an Israeli agenda.  It's known as the Yinon Plan

10:03.  Because it was written by a man by the name of Oded Yinon and published in 1982, "Israel's Master Plan to Dominate the Middle East" in an Israeli magazine is Zionist magazine called kibunin.  And thanks to an Israeli scholar named Israel shahak it was translated into English and published in Boston in the United States in 1982 which is how we know what this plan says.  And what it calls for is basically the balkanization of the Arab states, which means destroying the military in each Arab State one by one, and breaking up those states into ethnic state-lets which is exactly what's being done to Iraq.  See Iraq there just last week, Monday, there was an election in this referendum in the northern part of Iraq by Erbil, and the Kurdish population there voted to be independent

MAKING SENSE OF THE WAR ON TERROR | Christopher Bollyn Presentation (Ballard Library, Seattle | 2017-10-05) Christopher Bollyn's longest and most detailed presentation on who perpetrated 9/11 & the subsequent 'War on Terror' See also: ISRAEL DID 9/11 | Dr. Alan Sabrosky πŸ₯¨ (Press TV | 2011): x.com/simkrimms/stat [REDACTED]* DID 9/11: twitter.com/simkrimms/stat 9/11 AND ISRAEL’S GREAT GAME (Laurent Guyenot | 2022): twitter.com/simkrimms/stat THE ZIONIST PROJECT (Part 2) | ISRAEL 9/11: All Of The Pieces (2016): twitter.com/simkrimms/stat 9/11 MISSING LINKS (Mike Delaney | 2008): twitter.com/simkrimms/stat 9/11: BY WAY OF DECEPTION THOU SHALT MAKE WAR: twitter.com/simkrimms/stat TRICKED INTO WAR | 9/11 And The War On Terror (Christopher Bollyn Presentation | 2018): twitter.com/simkrimms/stat  

SOLVING 9-11: THE DECEPTION THAT CHANGED THE WORLD (Christopher Bollyn | 2012) | AUDIOBOOK Read By Christopher Bollyn: twitter.com/simkrimms/stat 

CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS: We Don’t Have a Financial Problem, We Have a Governance Problem

GHOULISH: “In the report of the Local Government Board of London, Eng., for 1906, it is admitted that the virus [for smallpox vaccinations] then used was obtained from the deadhouses on the . . ."

One of the bizarre places where vaccine seed virus used for vaccinations was obtained from.
In the report of the Local Government Board of London, Eng., for 1906, it is admitted that the virus [for smallpox vaccinations] then used was obtained from the deadhouses on the smallpox hospital ships, because they found it most effective. This vaccine was called corpse virus, and it cannot be denied that it carried with it the frightful danger of inoculation with cadaveric poison, one of the most deadly toxins known to science. [Audubon Republican, February 28, 1918.]

DR. JANCI LINDSAY: [T]hey knew, early on in 2021, that these went to the testes and these went to the ovaries. And not one academic lab, not one professor, not one scientific researcher—and I have begged them personally—has stood up. That's how unethical they are.

🚨"[W]e knew 30 years ago that there was a risk for [gene therapies] to be integrated into sperm, integrated into ova, and passed onto offspring. In fact, we sterilized people before giving them gene therapies..." 🚨"You are being lied to on a massive scale." In this clip from a video posted by Mic Meow (), taken from a Halt Hospital Homicide rally, toxicologist and molecular biologist Janci Lindsay () describes how the COVID-19 injections are gene therapies, and how gene therapies have been known—for 30 years—to not only potentially integrate into sperm and ova, but also cause cancers. "[W]e all knew this 30 years ago. The reason why gene therapies were never, ever brought to the forefront is because we knew 30 years ago that there was a risk for them to be integrated into sperm, integrated into ova, and passed onto offspring," Lindsay says. "In fact, we sterilized people before giving them gene therapies so that they would not corrupt the gene pool." Lindsay adds, "We knew that they caused leukemias and lymphomas because they caused leukemias and lymphomas when people were given gene therapy, and that's why they were not mass released." The toxicologist notes, "This was not something that we pulled out of a hat. This is in the scientific literature. These have always been known to be gene therapies. When you deliver a nucleoside to a cell with a sequence and you cause that cell to produce a protein it would otherwise not produce, guess what . . . that's gene therapy, and it always has been." "You are being lied to on a massive scale," the toxicologist says. "We thought that if we just talk to the CDC, if we just talk to the FDA and show them how mistaken they are . . . they are in on this . . . they are corrupt as hell. And they are killing your children. They are actively killing your children." Lindsay goes on to say that she's "trying to do some experiments in sperm and getting the official permission to do so, so that we can look and see if there's, in fact, genetic integration. Because there are over 1,000 reproductive biology labs in the U.S. and not one of them, not one, has looked to see if this has integrated in our gametes." The toxicologist adds:
"[T]hey knew, early on in 2021, that these went to the testes and these went to the ovaries. And not one academic lab, not one professor, not one scientific researcher—and I have begged them personally—has stood up. That's how unethical they are. That's how much they have love for money instead of love for truth and love for life. They are betraying humanity on a massive scale and we have to stop them."

9/11: Press for Truth

Luz Cannon writes,

Loose Change came out in 2005. That was pretty thoughtful.  Also, a Canadian film, The Great Deception, 2004, with Barrie Zwicker was excellent, and I'm pretty sure it well preceded Press for Truth, 2006.

Towers of Deception: The Media Cover-Up of 9/11, Barrie Zwicker, 2006.