And Seeley, in particular, pointed to the growing empires of Russia and the United States, which then were land empires, they were growing by expanding their territory organically from the center and moving out into contiguous lands, and getting bigger and bigger, but with their lands, all connected together. And Seeley pointed out that empires of this sort were innately easier and less expensive to defend than the British Empire, that ultimately Britain was going to have to face Russia and the US as enemies, and that England would lose this battle, precisely because of its, the vulnerability, the way that its colonies were spread out around the world. [25:07]
Here is a transcript of the interview.
When did globalism start, and who started it?
Globalism, the idea of establishing a world government that rules the entire planet, was put into form by the British, first emerged in Victorian England and it quickly was adopted by the Fabian socialists and these groups.
How the British Invented George Soros, Color Revolutions and Communism: Noor Bin Ladin Interviews Richard Poe.
W. T. Stead, a journalist who put forward the main plan for British globalism. The Americanization of the world argued that for it to continue with its great power place in the world it would have to merge with the United States. A superstate under British control. This ensured that the British could control the super state. NATO, Five Eyes Intelligence Treaties, most people know that the US and Great Britain are locked together in institutional frameworks to the point that they're not independent countries. Size does not mean dominance. India, Brazil, and Russia are all big countries. Bigness does not equal power in the world. It never did. Britain is small. Small production base. Brits learned to be powerful as a small country. The lessons they learned amidst larger countries, the Brits know these lessons, put them into practice, and know how to make them work. British are managing the US as they've managed the whole rest of the world for centuries. They've merged exactly the way that Stead suggested they merge. Our interests are locked together. Britain can control the US by . . .
England is often described as the obedient lapdog. It's the other way around W. T. Stead planned to merge with the US. Brits planned it. They implemented it, they had the jump on us, and had the initiative along their lines that serves them. US polices the world, relieving that burden by England. 1882, a book by Sealy, argues British Empire was unsustainable at that time, far-flung, colonies on many different continents, etc. spread out empire, ocean goign empires, made it vulnerable to attack. Sealy pointed to the empires of US and Russia, land empires, growing their territories from the center contiguously. Sealy said empires of this sort were easier and less expensive. England would face these enemies and lose. Solidified by groups, Roundtable, Fabians, etc. From a British standpoint, self-interest, they were logical and solid. To join forces with the US, arrange transnational institutions that would give England power over the think tanks, and policies. Chatham House in London, and Council on Foreign Relations, two sister organizations, formed in 1919. by 1921, they were 2 organizations but with the same purpose. Back channel for coordinating foreign policy to set up British dominance over the whole set up. Continues to function today and is the basis for UK/US relations but also for the entire world. W. T. Stead's vision is the world that has come to pass. Orwell's 1984 is dominated by Oceania, a country formed by the combination of the British Empire with the United States. Orwell's vision of the future was similar of British statesmen like W. T. Stead and Rhodes. We see this a lot in British statecraft. H. G. Wells and Orwell, write novels and write documents for intelligence. It's a marvel of organization. Why are the British, a small country, able to dominate us, a large country. Because their banking, education, and media systems are coordinated tightly. Very focused system. British intelligence in his opinion is the best in the world. most powerful, most ruthless agencies in the world. No other competitor. Who is the superpower, hyperpower, or hegemony? It's not the ballistic missiles or aircraft carriers. The most effective is a ruthless intelligence service. Any form of coercion and blackmail. Other intelligence services may hesitate to go that far. Brits conceal their power by portraying their own intelligence services as being incompetent. Playing possum.
No comments:
Post a Comment