WOW! Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson reveals Senator Ron Johnson knew about the Covid-jab DNA contamination but instructed frontline figures not to say anything because "we can't just go out there & tell the American people there's a possibility they're going to get cancer."… pic.twitter.com/zNQtcjtD3M
— Sense Receptor (@SenseReceptor) October 7, 2025
Tuesday, October 7, 2025
TOM LUONGO: [Ultimate goal of Trump's enemies] ultimate goal . . . turn Trump into King George and refuse to accept his leadership anymore, leaving Red America crippled.
I've been telling you for months now that Trump's enemies have been pursuing a Civil War Strategy. They have placed traitors as Democratic Governors like Heiferson Davis in important trade states like Illinois for a reason, to resist root and branch anything Trump does.
— Tom Luongo (Head Sneetch) (@TFL1728) October 7, 2025
Earlier…
I've been telling you for months now that Trump's enemies have been pursuing a Civil War Strategy. They have placed traitors as Democratic Governors like "Heiferson Davis," aka, Pritzker, in important trade states like Illinois for a reason, to resist root and branch anything Trump does.
Earlier this year, they started the messaging with "No Kings." Rolled out to set the table that Trump is beginning to act like the Tyrant we fought the Revolution against, King George III. It's a slick bit of rebranding seeing as this whole strategy circles right back to King Charles III himself and his global network of Organized Crime, including the Mexican cartels, Chinese Triads in Hongcouver, the Russian mafia hanging out in EU countries, etc. Now, you are seeing the opposition to ICE raids in very specific places -- Chicago, Portland, previously LA -- but not other places where Law Enforcement (LE) still functions. The goal isn't an armed insurrection that can easily be put down by both the citizens themselves with the help of the Nat. Guard and the Dept. of War. This is why they are pursuing the Schumer Shutdown (among other things), activating their Blackshirts, and setting up false flag operations over Ukraine. This is why Mark Carney was installed in Ottawa. The goal is laid out here in this article, written by an American, for the fucking Guardian. This is their ultimate goal . . . turn Trump into King George and refuse to accept his leadership anymore, leaving Red America crippled. https://theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/oct/05/blue-states-democrats-trump…Monday, October 6, 2025
If Oregon wishes autonomy, it can do without federal funding. https://t.co/qISP8SpE5y
— J Michael Waller (@JMichaelWaller) October 6, 2025
C3(@C_3C_3): Top 10 most dangerous US cities based off violent crime rates and Mayor’s party.
The last Republican mayor of Chicago was William "Big Bill" Thompson in 1931.
94 years of Democrat rule.
But yes, the crime in Chicago is Trump’s and MAGA’s fault.
Everything the Democrats touch… pic.twitter.com/iQC5XQ2AH4
The same year that Al Capone's criminal empire ended when he was convicted of tax evasion in 1931 and sentenced to 11 years in prison.
— C3 (@C_3C_3) October 6, 2025
Top 10 most dangerous US cities based off violent crime rates and Mayor’s party.
— C3 (@C_3C_3) October 6, 2025
1. St. Louis: Dem
2. Memphis: Dem
3. Baltimore: Dem
4. Detroit: Dem
5. Cleveland: Dem
6. Bessemer: Dem
7. New Orleans: Dem
8. Chicago: Dem
9. Philadelphia: Dem
10. Jacksonville: Dem
See a trend?
DR. RICARDO DUCHESNE: If American Whites don't regain this capacity for pride, loyalty, and honor about their ancestors -- they are doomed to disappear.
If American Whites don't regain this capacity for pride, loyalty, and honor about their ancestors -- they are doomed to disappear.
— Dr. Ricardo Duchesne (@dr_duchesne) October 6, 2025
Listen to Carl Schmitt, for Christ sakes!
"If a people no longer possesses the energy or the will to maintain itself in the sphere of politics,… pic.twitter.com/EZepROnVht
DuckDuckGo's Search Assistant states that,
Carl Schmitt wrote several influential books on political theory, legal theory, and political theology, including "Political Theology" and "The Concept of the Political." His works are known for their critical examination of liberal democracy and their controversial ties to Nazism.
Carl Schmitt, and his books.
What makes something political for Carl Schmidt the answer is Stark and unsettling. The political arises when human groups distinguish between friends and enemies and enemies this is not about personal hostility or mere disagreement it is about the existential possibility of conflict the kind that divides entire communities and may ultimately demand the willingness to kill or die. Schmidt argues that politics is not defined by debates over policy values or resource distribution instead it is constituted by a fundamental division those who belong to us and those who oppose a threat the friend enemy distinction is not a metaphor it's a real decisive separation that gives politics it's Unique intensity crucially Schmidt views this distinction is existential it determines the survival of a group's way of life. To identify an enemy is to declare that some other Collective threatens your identity your values or your continued existence the political then is the realm where this possibility of violent conflict is always present even if not always realized this is what sets Schmidt apart while liberal thinkers focus on consensus rights and deliberation he insists that the essence of politics lies in its intensity, in the ever present potential for US versus Them divisions that could erupt into war civil unrest or revolution whether we like it or not Schmidt claims all politics is ultimately grounded in this basic confrontation.
CRITIQUE OF LIBERALISM AND NEUTRALIZATION
Carl Schmidt believed that liberalism misunderstands the nature of politics and in doing so leaves societies dangerously unprepared for real conflict at the heart of his critique is the idea of neutralization the liberal attempt to tame politics by reducing it to procedures or economic exchanges liberalism Schmidt argues treats politics As a matter of rational compromise. It assumes that disagreements can be settled through discussion voting or legal adjudication in this view politics becomes administrative about regulation and governance not existential struggle but for sure vision is an illusion
The liberal attempt to reduce politics