DR. JUDY WOOD: Why wouldn't A&E for 9/11 Truth have put thermite in [their Request for Correction] or molten metal, the two hallmark things that they talk about? 2) they know it's a crime to defraud the government

@BirkMountainman the explaining was done.

A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented.

The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping… pic.twitter.com/kZdshZSUKq

— 9/11 Revisited (@911Revisionist) July 16, 2025

@BirkMountainman

the explaining was done. A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented. The only two brave souls that tried to take on the US Government in 2007, that the 9/11 "truth" movement is keeping hidden. Have a listen and read their court filings. Dr Morgan Reynolds: No More Games.

Dr. Judy Wood: https://drjudywood.com/wp/court-case-qui-tam/.   

Morgan Reynolds, Texas A&M Professor Emeritus of Economics, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor for President George W. Bush and former director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis.

Dr. Judy Wood the formerly a professor of Mechanical Engineering Clemson University, specialist in Material Science and Interferometry filed a case in 2007.

A nearly complete set of briefs and affidavits have been filed and U.S. District Court Southern District of New York, by the attorney for Dr. Judy Wood in the case and entitled Dr. Judy Wood ex rel USA vs. Applied Research Associates, Inc. et al.  1:07cv3314 (Hon. George B. Daniels, Judge).

In Wood v. ARA, evidence confirming that the annihilation and pulverization in approximately 10 seconds of each of the Twin Towers could not possibly have been caused by supposed jetliner impacts and kerosene (jet fuel is kerosene) is put forth in detail by Dr. Judy Wood, plaintiff-relator.

Reynolds v. SAIC (1:07cv4612) relies on evidence at 767 wide-body jet liners could not have done what video images depict such as attain the velocity of 540 mph at 1,000 ft or less above sea level or penetrate solid structural steel from nose to tail wing-tip to wing-tip without exploding without slowing, without degrading crumbling or losing a single part.

TRANSCRIPT

And being that there was an ongoing court case, I couldn't advertise, I couldn't talk about it.  Yeah, the Court of Appeals said, "Yeah, the law applies to this case, but we are ignoring the law in order to dismiss the case. We went to the Supreme Court so that we can say we did it all.  The Supreme Court doesn't have to hear the case, only if they feel like it.  I first submitted the request for correction.  That qualified me to file the Qui Tam case and then I was able to file the Qui Tam case. Okay, while that was cooking I started on the book.

00:32.  NIST, like most governmental agencies, relies upon contractors to do certain of its work.  Who should be a prime contractor for doing an investigation of the destruction of a building? Well, that's an easy well that's an easy answer.  You go to the companies that specialize in psyops and in the development of directed energy weapons because that is who they use.

1:06.  I have an important question to ask you.  Is there a reason why AE 911 truth or the 911 Scholars and all these other Grand Pooba organizations, is there a reason why they haven't filed in the court system anything about nanothermite?

1:20.  Well it comes down to the several things. Remember, I said that I filed a request for correction to NIST and became a whistleblower in doing that because I submitted my evidence to a government agency and right after that, about three and a half weeks after that, that's when AE 911 Truth website first one up, after I submitted that request for corrections to NIST and then they submitted theirs. But theirs didn't have anything about nanothermite in it.  This is submission to government agency, and at the time they were whining that I was up and so forth. The evidence shows the reverse because if you, it's a felony to defraud the government, but you wonder, okay, what are all the reasons you can think of why they wouldn't have anything about thermite in their request for correction to NIST?  

Why wouldn't they mention thermite or molten metal in their RFC?

They were basically saying you've got great data, you just need a little bit more of it.  It was pretty benign.  It was just a bunch of mumbo jumbo.  So why wouldn't they have put thermite in there or molten metal, the two hallmark things that they talk about?  I can only think of three reasons: 1) they really don't think it's important; 2) they know it's a crime to defraud the government; and 3) they know it's treason if done so by someone who works for another government agency because that's doing psyops on a government agency, that's attacking the government.  Can you think of another reason?

3:10.  As Dr. Judy Woods' research was being carried out, and quietly and carefully posted, various groups were forming online.  One of those groups was Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, headed by an architect known as Richard Gage.

Suspiciously, rather than promote data such as a seismic traces or the energy effects, his group (as well as others, have attempted to steer people away from what happened and instead promoted the theory that thermite was used on the towers, a theory which the seismic data alone rules out from being possible.

Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez was a medical student when he joined this group in the United States after learning more about 9/11.

In the following interview, he describes his experience with them and exposes how keen they are in reality to marginalize evidence, which points to them being controlled opposition.  

How is it that you came to begin questioning the 9/11 events?

The first real incident that I remember that led me to question 9/11 was becoming very concerned with the wars and repeatedly hearing on television that the wars were happening because of 9/11 and this was around 2008 when I was getting towards the end of studying biology at the University of Iowa in undergraduate college.  Our country was on this trajectory to cause all this harm and to drop all these bombs when there are so many people here at home that need our help and so many things can be improved.  So it's really just my concern for peace, and wanting to promote peace and become very concerned, and that's what led me to actually unfortunately I'm much wiser now thankfully, but unfortunately at the time that led me to become a supporter of Barack Obama unfortunately back in 2008.  I didn't think that all the things that he was saying we're going to turn out to be lies and false promises but at least at the time they sounded very good.  They sounded like someone who wanted to promote peace, wanted to end these wars, wanted to close Guantanamo Bay.  One of my wiser friends called me out at the time and said, "You know, he's a liar.  He's not going to change anything.  You need to look deeper into these topics, and one of the topics he mentioned was actually 9/11 and she referred me to some websites that helped me to be exposed to some information that made me feel very confident in my understanding that we had been lied to, that the 9/11 official story, known as the 9/11 Commission Report, was filled with lies.  I mean the accuracy, the omitted testimonies, and I became very concerned that we had been lied to and that we were going to war with these countries based on lies, and that was very unsettling for me.  So I naturally started searching more of the truth within 9E11, starting with organizations like Alex Jones and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and that felt like to be the right solution for me was to support those organizations that appeared to be doing something about it.  And one of the places I shared it with, I encountered this other PhD Professor, a really smart person, who was concerned and was listening to what I had to say and then she went further and shared some information with me and said, "You know what, I'm going to explain what happened.  They don't even come close to explaining what happened, and so you should check out all these other set of facts that you have not seen before." And she referred me to Dr. Judy Wood's website, a PhD professor and engineer, a very well qualified individual.  What I found at her website just blew me away.  There is this collection of facts that were so well documented so well referenced and almost all of the sources provided things that just could not be ignored could not be dismissed that showed conclusively that bombs do not explain what happened in fact the only thing that really explains what happened is the fact that those buildings were turned to fine dust in mid-air and the only thing that really can do that, that is consistent with the evidence is a general type of weapon known as a directed energy weapon and it sounds very difficult to swallow when you hear that being said without first seeing the facts to see if perhaps any of this information was on their website and it was not.  None of these very important facts were on the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth site or on Alex Jones's website.  . . . As to why these people who claim to be searching for the truth why they were not sharing all of these truthful factual very important pieces of evidence and it just didn't seem right to me so I ended up messaging Richard Gage in an email asking him if he knew about these facts on Dr. Judy Wood's website and if he did know about them why they're not on his website rather than getting a reply back from him actually I got banned from his website

ERIC WEINSTEIN, WEF, & WORLD BANK: Native workers will not support programs which lower their total incomes. Yet, migration can be counted upon to produce a reliable net benefit in host countries only if it is allowed to decrease wages.

Eric Weinstein has succeeded in making Americans poor and poorer. 

Weinstein was aware of the damage which economic migration was to do to the native populations in places such as the United States and the United Kingdom. In one part of the document he produced for this nefarious United Nations agenda entitled, “Preference for migrants, undercutting of natives” 

Eric R. Weinstein’s “Great Replacement” by @JohnnyVedmore

At the turn of the millennium, the United Nations was busily trying to encourage economic migration to the Western world. However, encouraging unfettered economic migration as we are experiencing today is highly…

— Johnny Vedmore (@JohnnyVedmore) September 25, 2024

Eric R. Weinstein’s “Great Replacement” by @JohnnyVedmore.  

Full article from Johnny Vedmore here.

At the turn of the millennium, the United Nations was busily trying to encourage economic migration to the Western world. However, encouraging unfettered economic migration as we are experiencing today is highly unpopular with native workers of the target countries. The United Nations International Labor Organization in Geneva set up "the MIGRANT Division" to analyze and find solutions to these issues. To lead the unit, the UN appointed Manolo Abella to be Chief of MIGRANT, who is now linked with the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, the University of Oxford, and others. Their stated challenge was to: “Find a free market solution to let employers reap the productivity benefit from decreasing their costs while boosting the income of native workers to the point where their interests become aligned with their employers.” To achieve this goal they decided on a solution. They wrote: “Native workers will not support programs which lower their total incomes. Yet, migration can be counted upon to produce a reliable net benefit in host countries only if it is allowed to decrease wages. Thus the solution is to realize that total income must rise while wage income is allowed to fall. This suggests that any natural free market solution must involve a natural income stream to host country workers which has previously been obscured or hidden. We then discover that if the (highly valuable) right of host country citizens to block access to labor markets is properly converted into a salable right, workers are made better off (since a salable right is always more financially valuable than a non-salable one). We thus convert the rights to preferential labor market access into rights of workers to license migrant work permits to employers. We find that with a little bit of care the market will now return an efficient solution with all parties being made better off.” Essentially the UN decided that the democratic voters of a nation-state would oppose unfettered economic migration, as we are experiencing today, and the folks at this globalist entity believed they knew better. To achieve their goals, the United Nations needed to subversively introduce this agenda in an undemocratic manner without gaining the consent of the native citizens of the democracies that they were to target. The man they chose to analyse and map out this scheme, which many refer to now as “The Great Replacement” was Eric R. Weinstein, who has since become a central figure in the “Intellectual Dark Web” whose members include Ben Shapiro, David Rubin, Jordan B. Peterson, Sam Harris, Douglas Murray, Joe Rogan, and Eric’s brother Bret Weinstein.

@EricRWeinstein

was employed by the UN to produce a document entitled, "Migration for the Benefit of All: Towards a New Paradigm of Economic Immigration." Weinstein was aware of the damage which economic migration was to do to the native populations in places such as the United States and the United Kingdom. In one part of the document he produced for this nefarious United Nations agenda entitled, “Preference for migrants, undercutting of natives”, Weinstein wrote: “When migrant and native workers of comparable value to an employer are asked to compete, it is to be expected that the employer will take the applicant who costs him/her less. If, however, the respective terms of employment of the native and the migrant workers differ considerably, the employer may develop a preference between otherwise equal candidates. If migrant workers are not permitted to seek alternative work in the host country, then their “company loyalty” is reduced to a matter of law and regulation. In such circumstances, employers know that they will not have to earn migrant worker loyalty with the expenditure of resources that would be needed in the case of native workers. Thus it is to be expected that in systems tethering migrant workers to their employer-sponsors, some migrants will out-compete natives of comparable or greater value simply by virtue of the terms of employment set by the MWP. Since this is precipitated by a rational market response on the part of native employers, this consequence must be seen as a natural, if unfortunate, by-product of direct migrant sponsorship.” The Weinstein plan was always going to cost the government money, as we see unfolding today. A meticulous and proactive plan would have to be enacted by the nation-state in question to deal with the impact of large-scale migration and the author makes this clear in the document, with Eric R. Weinstein stating: “In effect, the government would assume all the administrative and transport costs for a group of migrants, as well as calculating the additional external impacts of hosting them. To indicate these costs, the government would calculate the expected migrant impact cost as a function of the number of migrants. Such a function would be expected not only to grow as the number of migrants increased, but also to do so in accelerating fashion, because of concern for the environment, monitoring costs, societal stress, and security risks.” The plan which was set out by Eric Weinstein predisposes the necessity of what he describes as “a much larger redistribution of native income”. The influx of migrants will always take wealth and opportunities away from the native population and this has a knock-on effect on how the “self-interested electorate” of the nation-state involved will vote. “In the first instance, the tethering of migrants to employer-sponsors creates a non-market system with a host of inefficiencies, as well as the potential for human rights violations. Second, naively opening markets to migrants from lower-income countries can act as a kind of “tax”, redistributing native income away from workers and towards employers. Of course, it can be argued that any proposed redistribution is intrinsically neither good nor bad, yet such transfers can make it nearly impossible to reach broad consensus on many important migration issues within the host country electorate: rationality indicates that proposals which threaten to harm the majority of individuals are unlikely to be approved by a self-interested electorate.” While comparing and analysing different methods of controlling the influx of migrants, Weinstein also studies the “Borjas Model” of economic migration and the predictable effect of its implementation on native workers, stating: “Native workers in the sector concerned may experience none of the economic benefits of the migration program. In fact, in the absence of any compensation measures, they may experience a substantial loss of income, as the benefit to the host society stems from the ability to lower wages while simultaneously increasing the number of workers employed.”

The problems of “ghettoization” and issues relating to “long-term native shortages” are brought up by Weinstein as known consequences of the redistribution of income away from native populations, but at no point are these problems expressed as reasons not to force economic migration upon target populations. In this United Nations document, Eric Weinstein specifically pushes Marxist ideology concerning the redistribution of income and wealth which benefits economic migrants at the expense of the native populations. Eric Weinstein proudly advertised his work for the United Nations on his website at the time, as well as posing himself as an expert on the subject. Under the title of “International Migration”, Weinstein even had a special email address for issues concerning migration where it was written: “If you are interested in the creation of efficient markets for facilitating increased international labor migration, please contact me at migration@eric-weinstein.net regarding the article 'Migration for the Benefit of All' to appear in 2002 in the International Labor Review. It is a pleasure to thank the MIGRANT division of the United Nations ILO in Geneva for sponsoring this work.” Whether you like him or not, Eric Weinstein has not been honest about his part in designing the failed Globalist system of economic migration which many people today refer to as the “Great Replacement”. He also hasn’t advertised his previous involvement with the United Nations, and his connection to Edge while it was fully funded by Jeffrey Epstein. During this time, Weinstein was also producing models for JP Morgan, one of Epstein’s keenest employers. Find this article with source material at https://newspaste.com/2024/09/25/eric-r-weinsteins-great-replacement/… I have also linked the original UN sponsored document produced by Eric Weinstein, entitled: "Migration for the Benefit of All: Towards a New Paradigm of Economic Immigration." in PDF format.

Finish reading.

OWEN BENJAMIN: A lot of people want to feel poor, they want to feel broken, they want an excuse so they can indulge themselves

Step by step on how to get 100 tomato’s from a seed. I know it’s a wild claim but here’s my secret. pic.twitter.com/9Ub91dm06Q

— Owen Benjamin 🐻 (@OwenBenjamin) July 19, 2025

If you want to quickly jump to say, "Oh, it must be nice with all your money," 

A lot of people want to feel poor, they want to feel broken, they want an excuse so they can indulge themselves.  They want to act like the world's going to end when they die.  They want to act like everything is getting worse and worse.  So in order to live in that fantasy world, you have to reject that there's a way out.

"Lab leak" is linguistic surrender—it lets the bioterrorists hide behind the mask of incompetence.

Mouse King, meet the Nutcracker! 🤣🤣🤣 Hide your tiny nuts... https://t.co/TSZqgsPOM1

— sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art" (@sasha_latypova) July 19, 2025

Thank you very much. Here it is (I'll have to watch it once or twice myself to catch back up!) https://t.co/pJR8DlZcIJ https://t.co/M0D4xXC2ki

— @realDianaWest (@realDianaWest) July 19, 2025

The truth about Robert Mueller?  Well, what did we miss?  A whole lot it turns out.