Wednesday, July 9, 2025

PETER MCLOUGHLIN: Saint Thomas Aquinas would have predicted that importing Muslims into England would lead to English girls being raped by Muslims.

Saint Thomas Aquinas, in 1259, about Mohammed and Islam: "Mohammed seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh urges us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected; he was obeyed by carnal men. As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest wisdom. Indeed, the truths that he taught he mingled with many fables and with doctrines of the greatest falsity. "He did not bring forth any signs produced in a supernatural way, which alone fittingly gives witness to divine inspiration; for a visible action that can be only divine reveals an invisibly inspired teacher of truth. On the contrary, Mohammed said that he was sent in the power of his arms – which are signs not lacking even to robbers and tyrants. What is more, no wise men, men trained in things divine and human, believed in him from the beginning. Those who believed in him were brutal men and desert wanderers, utterly ignorant of all divine teaching, through whose numbers Mohammed forced others to become his followers by the violence of his arms. Nor do divine pronouncements on the part of preceding prophets offer him any witness. On the contrary, he perverts almost all the testimony of the Old and the New Testaments by making them into a fabrication of his own, as can be seen by anyone who examines his law. It was, therefore, a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity. It is thus clear that those who place faith in his words believe foolishly." Summa Contra Gentiles, Book 1, Chapter 16, Art. 4, Footnote 1

DIANA WEST: family courts [in England] to be determined by Sharia, which have all kinds of inequality for women, you know, women need for, well, this would be a criminal case, but under the Sharia, women need 4 witnesses to a rape to bring charges

What you're looking at is the confluence, the sort of affinity of totalitarianism, and what I mean by that is despotism, or we call it in a 20th century, totalitarianism, and Islam have great commonality: the control factor.  --Diana West
from Michael Farris @ "Coffee and a Mike" Show.  

4:05.  I had kind of a baptism by fire if you will in an education on Islam because at the time of 9/11 very few people knew anything about it and as I was struggling to learn I was immediately coming up against obstacles and censorship and ostracism you name it and I was very conscious of what language could be used, what the freight would bear in the public square because I was writing newspaper columns I was writing editorials at the Washington Times and also going out over the wire so I was acutely aware of what could be said, what should be said, what wasn't being said, along about a few months into all of this terrible frenzy that happened at that time after the destruction of the twin towers and the Pentagon and the plane over Pennsylvania.

7:40  The silence on Islam protects Islam.

18:14. You know they are not a fan of their government they are from there there's a reason why they left there. Some of them are Muslims, some of them are not anymore.  They are Americanized now but they're good people, right? And I'm not saying you're saying that but in just in terms of . . . 

18:38.  I was just going to say the anecdotal and the personal is not how we do statecraft however I think the wise answer to that is from a writer and ex-Muslim, named Ibn Warraq, whose book I very . . . I mean it was very happenstance.  On 9/11 or I guess it was probably 9/11 or 9/12, I went to my local bookstore.  We still had bookstores all the way back then.  This was Borders Books in Westchester County, New York that's where I lived at the time which is about an hour outside of New York City and so the Islam shelf had been pretty much cleared out when I wanted to go buy a Quran and I wanted to start getting some books cuz I was going to start writing and thinking and all of that. One of the books I came to was a book by Ibn Warraq who was an ex-Muslim, and he wrote a book called, Why I am not a Muslim, 1995, and it's very fascinating overview of all of these issues.  He loves his family.  He has family members who don't even know he left Islam and he writes under a pseudonym and he says that it's not that there is no such thing as a moderate Muslim, however, and there is no moderate Islam and so there is wiggle room for anybody inside any sort of system but the system itself is what we would call extreme it's not exceptional it is sanctioned by the Quran mainstream writings, the Quran itself, the Hadith, the Surah, all of these Macy's for the religion sanctioned these things and so whether somebody is falling away or leaves it and you have to keep that secret because apostasy is a capital crime in Islam.  You know, it is literally a death penalty offense to leave Islam.  But if you are, you know, finding a new way on your own, that's a separate issue.  But in terms of the Sharia, which we see Sharia courts I think they first started coming into England probably about 10 no over a dozen years ago, family courts to be determined by Sharia, which have all kinds of inequality for women, you know, women need for, well, this would be a criminal case, but under the Sharia, women need 4 witnesses to a rape to bring charges.  You know the inheritance laws, etc., very anti-woman.  So these kinds of things start seeping into society regardless of a moderation of an individual.  So that is kind of where I'm coming from.  It's very important to keep the tenants and the mainstream classical sources of this in mind.

22:13.  Do you feel that in all your research because I like I look at this and I think especially, let's talk about Europe for a second because to me it's the European governments these countries that allowed all this.  I mean I know Belgium is way out of hand England France Ireland my friend Matt Bracken was just over Ireland Germany, . . . 

. . . .Denmark, Norway, . . . 

. . . Spain and Italy part of this too?

22:42.  all of them, all of them to varying degrees.  You're right you're absolutely right this had to be enabled and this is where I get to the next big thought I wanted to throw around which has to do with what is sometimes referred to as the red green axis.  So red being communism green being Islam why would the two work together we were looking at the influence of these governments these are not native Islamic governments.  These are European for the most part.  I mean England has very much changed to a lot of Islamic British people who now run cities, but they are Islamic, you know, the mayors, and so on, and so many of that.  But I'm not talking about that.  I'm talking about the native born, the indigenous peoples of Europe enabled this, or their governments certainly.  What you're looking at is the confluence, the sort of affinity of totalitarianism, and what I mean by that is despotism, or we call it in a 20th century, totalitarianism, and Islam have great commonality: the control factor.

23:57.  The control of Islam is not just control controlling the politics of the world; there is the law, and there is a law that comes down to your most personal behavior, literally, including how you wash yourself and things like that, and which hand goes first in various extremely private acts. These are all written out in terms of law.  So it is a what there's been numerous historians pretty much between the middle of the 19th century and the middle of the 20th century, who made these observations about how before we come to the word totalitarian, but how despotic Islam is, the control system, law, religion, you know, culture, everything under control and written out.  And then when you marry that to the strain of Marxism that became Bolshevism first after the Russian Revolution and so on, there is a tremendous synergy between them as control systems.  And so you see numerous thinkers, experts in Sharia law, experts in communism, coming to this very interesting conclusion that I think does explain why you see this red green axis.  Look at the latest anti-Trump, anti Netanyahu protest that's been called in Washington DC outside the White House.  If you look at the sponsors

EVA VLAARDINGERBROEK: Imagine this in an Asian or an African country imagine their leaders rejoicing in the fact that their people will soon no longer be the majority in their own country.

Amsterdam currently consists of 56% migrants. The Hague, 58% migrants. Rotterdam almost 60% migrants.  And of course most of these immigrants come from non-Christian non-western African and Middle Eastern countries. Conclusion the Dutch population is already outnumbered in the majority of our cities.  

London, 54% migrants.  Conclusion: native population outnumbered. Brussels, color me shocked, 70% migrants.  Conclusion: native population majorly outnumbered.  

And other Europeans will, of course, follow suit soon if they haven't already.  So I'm going to draw the forbidden conclusion here.  The great replacement theory is no longer a theory.  It's reality. And what's interesting about replacement is that the establishment will either deny its existence or when they admit to it, they say it's a good thing that the native European population is soon no longer a majority on its own continent.  

Dutch national disgrace and dubbed climate Pope, Frans Timmermans, already stated in 2015 that "diversity is humanity's destiny, and that Europe will be diverse."  And, of course, by now I think we all know what they mean with the word diversity.  It means [fewer] white, people less of you.  Imagine this in an Asian or an African country imagine their leaders rejoicing in the fact that their people will soon no longer be the majority in their own country.  Absolutely Unthinkable.  Unimaginable. So what in the world is wrong with our leaders?  

Tuesday, July 8, 2025

CHASE HUGHES: I'm going to change my environment very regularly so my brain doesn't go into "I'm familiar with this" mode.

Reticular Activating System, RAS.  Whatever you want to change in your life, anything you want to change in your life, jam it down into that part of the brain.  And the way to jam it down into that part of the brain is ask "How can I communicate to this to a dog?"

It requires imagery, emotions, smell, and then repetition.  Just training a dog.

There's a formula that I use to teach for actual brainwashing and it works the same to brainwash ourselves out of a behavior or into a new behavior.  That's Focus, Emotion, Agitation, and Repetition: F.E.A.R.  So agitation meaning I'm going to change my environment very regularly so my brain doesn't go into "I'm familiar with this" mode.  So it's like, "Wow, these walls are different color in my office.  My couch in my living room is in a different place."  I'm going to continuously move around to force my lower brain to say, "Things are new. You need to pay attention."

DR. KEN BERRY: Kidney stones, 80% of the time, 85% of the time, they are calcium oxalate stones. Where do you get oxalates from? Plants.

Kidney stones, 80% of the time, 85% of the time, they are calcium oxalate stones.  Where do you get oxalates from?  Plants.  You can actually look up on the internet "give me a list of high oxalate foods," and it'll give me the top 20.  They're all plants.  So many people when they have a kidney stone, their doctor tells them, "Oh, you got to quit eating meat.  Don't drink milk.  You got to eat a plant-based diet."  That's literally the worst advice on planet Earth.  If you've had a kidney stone in the past, a plant-based diet is the last thing you want to be eating because that's going to increase the odds that you'll have another kidney stone because most kidney stones by far and away are oxalate stones.  Oxalates come from plants.  --Dr. Ken Berry