JOHN BEAUDOIN: The agenda smacks of an agent meaning to preemptively manipulate the viewer into a predisposition of Kruse is a bully and Means is a victim to feel sorry for and support.

The interview was weird because Means did not react as any normal person would. He acted as someone trained in conflict facade creation. There is nothing genuine about his carefully chosen responses. He is not a natural person. Because he is playing a roll. He is in character. --John Beaudoin.

As I read the prose below, I sense a woman who is trying to make the reader believe she’s offended by Kruse’s aggressive nature and prefers the wimpy narrow shouldered pseudo man who remains calm like a guy in divorce court trying to not have an outburst else lose custody of his… https://t.co/Amg2QOU4xo

— John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, The Real CdC (@JohnBeaudoinSr) May 9, 2025

BEN MARBLE, MD: Stop killing us. Stop the shots.

"It's your patriotic duty to be as healthy as you can."
That attitude - when held by the people in charge of government departments - can be used to justify the most heinous and invasive intrusions into your life.
Honestly - horrors beyond imagining. https://t.co/945kXZa85a

— Polly St George aka Amazing Polly (@FringeViews) May 9, 2025

MRNA=BIOWEAPON @realDonaldTrump stop killing us stop the shots. https://t.co/fMo4BzMkP3

— Dr. Joseph Sansone (@PhdSansone) May 9, 2025

DR. SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: The medical literature says that it's not a good idea to lower fevers in people with infections

🔥Dr. Suzanne Humphries GOES OFF on fever reducers like Tylenol

“The medical literature says that it's not a good idea to lower fevers in people with infections … We need to stop it.”@DrSuzanneH7 pic.twitter.com/CXvWobz6N8

— Children’s Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) April 16, 2025

Instead of giving fever reducers which basically smack down the life force that is trying to destroy the microbe, invaders, and everything that I talked about before.  The medical literature says that it's not a good idea to lower fevers in people with infections, okay?  So we need to stop it.  These orders on the charts that are automatic for fever reducers, Acetaminophen, ibuprofen Toradol, steroids, all that, I think that should be a pharmacy-only prescription that has to be approved by a pharmacist that's been educated.

The complete interview.

Watch Dr. Humprhies’ whole interview on CHDTV 👇https://t.co/RjnBAYu6MT

— Children’s Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) April 16, 2025

JENNIFER DEPEW, RD: Citrus peel and pomegranate are still natural antidotes to the bioweapon

Citrus peel and pomegranate are still natural antidotes to the bioweapon https://t.co/cf2QkpSJXw pic.twitter.com/Uh8zsBu0XE

— Jennifer Depew, RD (@deNutrients) May 9, 2025

DR. PAUL MARIK: "One of the most effective treatments to knock out the stem cell is the famous horse deworming medicine," says Dr. Paul Marik. Yes, Ivermectin.

These are generally slow-growing, but they're distinct in that they have the ability to divide indefinitely and grow indefinitely, and can change their characteristics. Basically, if you get rid of the fast-dividing cells, which is the cancer, you're left with the stem cells, which then become the roots, which grow back to form the tumor" sometimes years later. Conventional chemotherapy gets rid of the fast-dividing regular cancer cells but *NOT* the stem cells. So the key question is: how do you get rid of the stem cells? “There are a number of repurposed drugs that do it, and this has been well-established in scientific medical literature. One of the most effective treatments to knock out the stem cell is the famous horse deworming medicine," says

@drpaulmarik1

.

Yes, ivermectin.

🚨Here's what a lot of people misunderstand about cancer treatment, says @drpaulmarik1:

"Cancer is not homogeneous. The somatic mutation theory—which is the current theory in which treatment is based—posits that you have a mutation in a single cell, and that gives rise to a… pic.twitter.com/N0HhPE6fU0

— Jan Jekielek (@JanJekielek) May 8, 2025

Here's what a lot of people misunderstand about cancer treatment, says

@drpaulmarik1

: "Cancer is not homogeneous. The somatic mutation theory—which is the current theory in which treatment is based—posits that you have a mutation in a single cell, and that gives rise to a whole population of cells that look the same and have the same mutation. But the Cancer Genome Atlas has shown that that theory is completely wrong. The cancer cells are very heterogeneous, so they're made up of very different populations of cells with different mutations, and one of the populations is the cancer stem cell. It's a sub-population of the cancer. These are generally slow-growing, but they're distinct in that they have the ability to divide indefinitely and grow indefinitely, and can change their characteristics. Basically, if you get rid of the fast-dividing cells, which is the cancer, you're left with the stem cells, which then become the roots, which grow back to form the tumor" sometimes years later. Conventional chemotherapy gets rid of the fast-dividing regular cancer cells but *NOT* the stem cells. So the key question is: how do you get rid of the stem cells? “There are a number of repurposed drugs that do it, and this has been well-established in scientific medical literature. One of the most effective treatments to knock out the stem cell is the famous horse deworming medicine," says

@drpaulmarik1

. Yes, ivermectin.

@Honest_Medicine